Help talk:Citation Style 1/Archive 48

1202:

unnecessary, do not benefit the reader, and add to the clutter that is the reference section. For ephemeral sources (web pages, on-line news articles, etc), an access date is important because it allows the reader to hunt down an archived copy of the page as it was on the access date. If it is necessary to determine when you added a cs1|2 template to an article, there is a tool to help you. At the top of every article's history page is a link Revision history search. For example: say that you want to know when you added the Ferri's Clinical Advisor 2013 template. Copy the title (best from the wiki source because the template or browser may have modified the what you see), go to the history page and click the history search link and paste the title into the 'Search for' box. Click the 'Start' button and get the result.

4907:

saying that IE should be used. But a diligent editor is supposed to look at this, just as they are supposed to look at a book's or journal's front and back matter for edition/copyright info, etc. etc. A citation with "Archived copy" as title should not be "fixed" to conform with cs1 presentation. It should be flagged so that editors are alerted that something is amiss. Because I think that an automated routine to fix this is more likely to mess things up. Another option is to substitute the (visible) top heading for the webpage's title, even if this is technically incorrect. Although this may not be the way pages are indexed (and therefore retrieved) by software looking for the webpage's metadata, it would be sufficient for humans looking for the page's data.

4884:. There was a title bot (forget name) that did this and left an inline comment the title was created by bot, and more often than not those titles need manual cleanup. For some reason the bot owner is no longer operating it. Point is, title bots are not trivial and require a fair amount of effort to watch over. It's beyond the scope of other bots and tools to individually create their own title bot routines, not even considering the network I/O overhead of polling each link when they might not otherwise need to. If you want to help by creating a title bot that would be awesome but not if it's pasting in title data blindly, it should be looking for edge cases and building up a system to detect and fix repeatable problems. -- 663:. This is a massive hassle to track down, and is made much easier with an access date: you simply go directly to that date in the page history; on a busy page this can save a tremendous amount of time digging around trying to figure out when a cite was first added. This verifiability boosting effect has nothing to do with URLs. It's weird to me that people aware that the parameter can serve one function seem blind to the fact that it can serve another which is also important. Seems a bit like denying that italic markup can be used for anything but titles of works and "therefore" that its use for genus and species should be banned. Heh. 4071:, is it necessary to re-link the publication in subsequent references from the same work? I've personally avoided this as I find it to be obtrusive when looking at the reference section as a whole (far too many Wiki links to the same publication), but this could be a biased perspective given that I am a frequent editor—it may prove useful for casual readers to have immediate linked access to the publication when hovering over individual footnotes as they read. I am unsure about how to handle this. Thank you. -- 4423:. First choice would be to restructure the citation scheme so a work only appears once in the reference list. But if that seems too complex to the editors who maintain the article, the second choice would be to link it every time, because when the reader arrives at the reference list, the reader is only focused on the source that supports the claim of interest; the reader probably isn't going to read the entire reference list and so will not be aware the publisher is linked somewhere else. 1330:. This is a massive hassle to track down, and is made much easier with an access date: you simply go directly to that date in the page history; on a busy page this can save a tremendous amount of time digging around trying to figure out when a cite was first added. This verifiability boosting effect has nothing to do with URLs. It's weird to me that people aware that the parameter can serve one function seem blind to the fact that it can serve another which is also important. 31: 3759:. With the deprecation now implemented, the error shows up in prior issues of "Recent research" where it is triggered. I can probably clean that up without much trouble, since I am the only one who added them as far as I am aware. I am posting here, however, because I noticed something that might be relevant and worthwhile to consider. Your input is appreciated.Specifically, I often come across arXiv citations being formatted using 4362:

among the parts of the community participating in those discussions is mainly in favour of linking. There will be disagreements on details, certainly, and local consensus still decides for any given article; but I think the general guidance now is to link all the most important parameters (title, author, publisher, publication) that have Knowledge articles, and to not redlink any of them unless the target is clearly notable. --

4261:", "same work" implies a single source, and "subsequent references" thus suggests repetition of a single full citation. Which, as I explained at the outset, is wrong. Okay, so what you really meant (I gather) is wikilinking of data, such as the name of a publication, name of the publisher, place of publisher or publication, name of a work ("Encyclopedia Brittanica"), author's name, etc., that shows up more than once in a 4512:

is located in Mill Valley, California. Using these techniques for brevity can reduce the number of wikilinks, but not always reduce them to one wikilink per Knowledge article. I personally do not routinely link publishers or publisher locations, but I might if the Knowledge article adds information about a publisher or place that isn't common knowledge. (For example, from its name, many readers might not guess that

1042:

says that this is the 'About Us' page at example.com, and I found that it was indeed the 'About Us' page for that website" (which is what that date means) and "I went to this page, and not only is this the URL to the 'About Us' page still working, I scrolled through the whole 'About Us' page just to make sure that it still says that Alice Expert is their Chief Expertise Officer". As for why that's relevant,

4600:"Archived copy" is standard wording used by multiple tools/bots in the same situation of not being able to determine the title, so it's easy to track with a search. If users will tackle it manually or with AWB by all means create a tracking category. Ideally it would be done by a specialized title bot since there are likely endless edge cases to deal with when extracting title data. -- 1085:

a citation and say that they checked to make sure that the source truly supported the content; have you? However, I have seen editors check that a link is working/leads to the expected source more than a few times. Probably sometimes it's both (e.g., when the title of an article is sufficient to verify the content), but I've never seen someone mention doing both.

571:

reference, how will looking at this date help them? Are you expecting people who add an updated claim from the same reference, in a way that looks like it could be hijacking but isn't, to understand your cryptic countermeasure and update the access-date in order to reassure you that they're on the up-and-up? Why do you think they will know or care to do that? —

1225:. It's not 'verify date', it is 'access date' -- we should not have called it 'access date', if we wanted, 'verify date'. As a matter of practice, it is almost certain that when editors read the source again, they do not update the access date, so it is not last verification, it is about when the web-address was 'accessed' (and that is all it is). -- 5482:. One of the things that I have thought to do is to tweak the language parameter code so that it first tests the language value against the local language list. If that fails ('French' not found in the ru.wiki language list), try again with the English language list. If you go ahead with this project, it will be a useful test-bed for this idea. 1243:

Hypothetically I could imagine a room at a special library or government office where the public can go and look something up with terminals that are not connected to the Internet, or some sort of mobile phone app that lets you look stuff up but there is no URL. So can anyone give a real life scenario where something like that could happen?

4865:). The fact that the encapsulating archive page has its own (html) title is irrelevant. The underlying archive is what is cited. The technical detail that this is an archived copy is handled elsewhere in the citation. The citation in question is not edited correctly, and "Archived copy" should not be used when the title is available. 263:. Keep in mind also that what is available at Google Books or some other site might change at any time; just because a snippet view with the content needed was visible on 29 March 2007 doesn't mean it is now. If someone goes to verify the claim and can't find it in the online material, they're apt to delete the claim or put 878:—continue to treat the access date as an error for offline sources. Access dates in citations exist to give a known date for a source published without an explicit date, or to confirm a date when a source of an ephemeral nature was accessed. Fixed sources, like printed materials, do not need such a thing. 6550:

It seems like the course of action followed was to make a change that identified an issue in MediaWiki, then leave the broken code in place, blaming MediaWiki. That leaves the site broken. Do I have it right? If no, what am I missing? If so, how is that really what's best for the site and its users?

535:

with a claim there's a "general consensus" against the idea. I don't believe this is true at all. I've been involved in most of the previous discussion of this and it's the same handful of bot-oriented people who oppose the idea, and who never respond substantively to the content-editorial concerns.

5495:

because too many date parameters are too many date parameters; because Lua is much more capable than parser functions and wikitext; because we had no need for such data granularity (and if we develop such a need, the component parts of a date can easily be extracted from a whole date). Editors here

4511:

I wasn't quite sure what the OP was referring to. The various methods of completely combining citations, or using a mixture of short and full citations, can reduce, but not eliminate, the repetition of certain facts, such as Oxford University Press being a publisher, or that University Science Books

3872:

No. The cs1|2 templates are confusing; there are lots of them and there are even more parameters. The use of error messaging is one way to educate those who use these templates (because you know, even when it's good, no one reads the documentation – except perhaps you – and the cs1|2 documentation

3788:

is just the catch-all template one uses for scientific articles. I know the differences, but that is because I regularly cite in CS1, have spent many hours reading the documentation, and have experimented with the templates enough to understand them better than the documentation sometimes documents.

2348:

to be presented is when you cite the preprint as a preprint, since it gives you an idea of the moderation involved with it (general physics is the unfiltered shove-all repertoire where crank/junk ends up, although not all general physics is crank/junk). Once it's been reviewed, the version of record

2070:

I have a reference whose correct publication date (according to JSTOR, changed only by conversion from hyphens to en-dashes) is "Fall–Winter 1988–1989". This results in a "Check date values" error message. How to format this date so that it is both accurate and non-complaining? (Noting in particular

1084:

The idea that it represents an editor (i.e., any editor after the person originally adding it) carefully determining that "the source actually verifies X" rather than "the source is present at this URL" appears to be wishful thinking. I don't think that I have ever seen anyone update these dates in

1046:

is a problem with sources that aren't web-only and endlessly mutable (such as 'About Us' pages). It's also a problem with URIs to pages whose content will reliably be preserved somewhere, such as newspaper articles and government records. (Remember all the problems we had with editors adding links

1041:

No, it doesn't indicate the date that the source was "last checked". It indicates "a day" (perhaps only rarely "the last day", since these dates are not usually updated) when the source was "accessed" and determined to be present at that URL. There is a significant difference between "The citation

181:

pointed out that a no-URL access date "shows a diligent reader where to look at archive.org to check a source that may have changed since the access-date." However, an online search is an online search and the date when a web source was last accessed, even if the date accepted is correct (i.e. not a

5244:

is used mainly in translated articles. Its current ruwiki version is a slightly edited many-years-old version of the enwiki template. I was going to replace it with the current enwiki version based on the CS1 family of modules, but it turned out that along with many improvements it would cause some

1416:

today, if someone finds a free link to the book in 2 years, and puts that up, then you'll have a wrong access-date suddenly display. There is zero benefit to anyone to know that Bob read a book on a specific date, it's the same book today as it was then. Access-dates only make sense you have url to

1351:

There is a tool that allows one to find when a bit of wikicode was added so there is no loss. And can you depend on the access-date being what you expect because users may put when they accessed the book (2 years ago), not the date they added the citation which is what you're after and conceptually

1114:

change the dates by default), but these editors have normally stopped when it was pointed out to them how citations work. Now, in light of the quotation from the template documentation above (sorry for not coming up with this earlier), it seems that your view is at odds with the way these templates

993:

If a real date is present, I think that the access-date generally does not need to display. I don't care what date you looked up something on Google Books; I care when the book was published. However, it's possible that the ideal varies by source type: display for cite web and cite news, but not

724:

He is referring to the phenomenon where some editor adds new claims in front of an existing footnote so that it looks like the new claim is sourced when it isn't. He wants to abuse access-date to somehow detect this problem. I think this is a mistaken attempt at a solution (because it only works if

175:

but those are irrelevant: Citation highjacking can be amended easily and quickly by re-adding extant, live references, while the value of information in an article should be weighed on its own, i.e. the Knowledge user searching for information is not interested in the good faith, assumed or not, of

4302:

Thanks--this was what I felt made most sense. It seems my question was misunderstood by several other commenters here. I've been on Knowledge for years and know how to use citation templates, name them in the reference brackets, etc. My question had to do with wikilinking publications in citations

500:

can stay; not all maintenance categories are about errors and indicate a backlog; many of them (e.g. all our redirect classification categories) are useful for other things. This one in particular could be used for periodically re-checking for online versions of things to provide URLs, and can be

6193:

For more context, some outside style manuals call for the volume number of a journal to bolded. Volume numbers usually start at 1 the year the journal is founded, and go up by 1 each year. If the volume parameter is short, it's assumed to follow this convention, and gets bolded. If it's long, the

6103:

Nearly all uses of the template seem to ignore this. The result is a host of Volume descriptors, that are nothing but bold printed numbers. This could lead to misunderstandings and confusion among users trying to find the cited journal article. For an impression of the extent of the mistaken use,

4361:

linked unless the relevant datum is fairly clearly notable; and so forth. I've been practicing that for a long time but with the expectation that someone would eventually jump down my throat for it; but the discussion linked above, and a previous discussion here, suggests that the rough consensus

1180:

If a cite book template contains a URL I absolutely include an accessdate too. The cite book template example above provided by a Diff 'does' include a URL so for sure I would include an accessdate too. I used to include accessdates for all book cites but I have backed down. For one thing, if you

6607:

You can use the word blame if you'd like. I prefer to think that we diagnosed a problem and notified the cognizant people who have done whatever it is that they do to confirm the diagnosis and create a remedy. Yes this problem manifests itself in a way that causes grief for certain templates.

5542:

because cs1|2 produces COinS metadata; because too many author parameters are too many author parameters; editors here ignored the plural / singular distinction. COinS does not have support for multiple names in a single key/value pair – COinS expects the name of one author for each instance of

4906:

element. Internet Explorer (the browser I am using right now) has a "Page" dropdown menu in the Command toolbar, that includes a "Properties" option. When you click this, the title of this page as I edit it ("Editing Help talk:Citation Style 1 (section) - Knowledge") is right at the top. I'm not

1109:

text was found at the URL, not the date when that URL had any text whatsoever. As for the situations where editors update the access date, these are really rare: typically during large rewriting of articles (and hence when the sources have been consulted). Yes, I've seen editors fiddle with the

589:

exists to show when a web page was verified as supporting a specific claim. Since web pages can change, the access-date shows a diligent reader where to look at archive.org to check a source that may have changed since the access-date. Books, journal articles, and other sources that exist in a

1949:

Yeah, I saw that the class was being used slightly differently than I had interpreted it, just before you left a message. I created a new .cs1-maint to take the color and the display declaration and style. That should probably be refactored to use /Configuration since it is more like the error

1079:

A date-of-last-working-URL isn't entirely useless, as it gives editors a chance to figure out which dates to focus on, if they're trying to find an archived copy of the link. It's probably also useful to the occasional reader. I expect people to be less surprised if a URL marked "Retrieved 1

1065:

that were the way this parameter is most commonly used on wikipedia, then it would be either misleading or at best entirely useless, and should be deprecated altogether. But that's not how editors normally use it and it's not how it is supposed to be used, see for example how documention of

570:

Can you explain how having an access-date but no URL for a book source is in any way useful? What information is it supposed to convey to other editors (since it will be invisible to readers)? How is this in any way an anti-hijacking measure? If editors are checking whether a diff hijacked a

4404:

The consensus I'm seeing in these discussions is that the references are not article prose and thus the usual concerns for OVERLINK do not apply. And I agree with that: "sea of blue" doesn't really matter in the references because it's a list of metadata, not prose that needs to be readable

4064:

Hello all, this is something I've wondered for awhile and have not been able to find a consensus/answers to, but I was curious as to whether or not a publication should be recurrently linked within the reference section of an article. In other words, for example, if ref. 1 of an article is

1201:

The pupose of an access date is to identify the date on which an ephemeral source was consulted. For those sources that have nil chance of changing from one day to the next (books; encyclopedia; journal, newspaper, magazine articles; any on-line something with a doi, etc.) access dates are

1242:

If someone can explain a plausible scenario where someone would use a changable computer source as a citable reliable source in Knowledge, but that source is not accessible through a URL, then I will support having an access date with no URL, and rendering this access date in the article.

6491:

No. MediaWiki was flawed before the 29 September 2018 module update but no one knew it. The module update revealed the flaw. I am saying that the proper solution is to fix MediaWiki, which apparently has been done and is just waiting for review and implementation; see §Hacking around

1304:

The words in books don't change, but the text in our articles (supposedly supported by the book/website) does. SMcC is approaching this from the text side ... not the source side. He isn't really talking about the date that the source was added to the citation ... but the date that the

3829:

conflict with the whole purpose of using the parameter?Lastly, I apologize for having not brought this up earlier. As I said above, I only recently discovered this occurred due to the deprecation error message and I do not usually check this page (but probably should do so more often).

903:

I am sure that there are electronic resources that you cannot provide a direct URL to the resource (or enough of one to meet WP:V) which do get updated over time, so the access date is important for those resources. There's likely only a handful of such cases, but they still exist.

1009:

You should especially not treat access-date as meaning verified-on-date when the URL leads to identifier records such as worldcat.org or paywalled sources (e.g., most scientific journal articles). Those URLs rarely verify the content directly, even though they are valuable links.

4904:

I think you misunderstood the point I was making. The cited citation is malformed. This has nothing to do with bots. Editors should be given the correct guidance: when the title of a webpage is not obvious, they should look at the source, and specifically search for the <title:

968:

after any citation that contains an access date (because that allegedly means that some actually already did verify every single one of those citations with access-dates, right? Well, I'd say no, myself, but I'd also change the help docs to be clearer that it doesn't mean that).

6111:

On IRC, Huon proposed to change the code so that a regular error message is produced instead of just bolding the too short entry. This would prevent future mistaken use. If considered important enough, perhaps the existing countless issues of mistaken use should also be fixed.

4354:

and then modify that with common sense: publication location should normally not be linked by the same rationale that place names should generally not be linked in prose; dates and years should not be linked as with in prose; author names, publishers, and works should not be

5583:) required several AWB scripts (to find and fix the low-hanging fruit) and a lot of manual fixes. This is the most difficult of the tasks ahead of you because human names are endlessly variable as are the ways that editors choose to represent those names in cs1|2 templates. 5266:

The last point is particularly painful because the main problem with the current ruwiki version of this template is that it ignores parameters like first1, last1, etc. So we end up with not showing author lists when using either of the two versions (but in different cases).

957:

and may want to comment on whether this idea seemed descriptive of actual practice, or if it might have been a bit of hopeful thinking. I don't think that I've ever seen anyone treat this date as meaning that the source had been checked; if so, then we should never put

5460:

I guess that step one is for the ru.wiki community to decide that they want to upgrade to the cs1|2 module suite and that they want to do it for all of the cs1|2 templates. Seems silly to me to retain the old old old wikitext versions of some templates but use new for

398:

problem, since it remains in the wikisource, but I've seen well-meaning but boneheaded gnomes remove it as "inapplicable" and it's tiresome to have to revert them again and again. Maybe the doc should be updated to say to leave the "silent parameter" there as an anti

6573:. Between then and the 29 September update we modified the cs1|2 modules and styles.css to move inline style from the modules into styles.css (where it belongs). More than two months after TemplateStyles was enabled, we implemented it. On that day you noticed that 2001:

You are write that presentation for maintenance messages should be in /Configuration so I have done that. The space that you were seeing was a simple hack so that multiple maintenance messages were properly separated when rendered. That is now fixed in the sandbox:

6095:

I encountered a very far-spread problem with the use of the "volume" parameter of this template. According to the docs, the parameter expects an entry like "Volume four", "Vol. 4", "Band VII", etc. If anything shorter than 4 characters is entered, this is printed in

4313:

in each citation, or only the one that first appears?). Linking the publication in every single citation overwhelms the reference section in my opinion and results in excessive links, but as I said, I am not sure there has been a consensus on this among editors.

1448:- While such a parameter seems irrelevant for paper sources as the physical copy which is seen doesn't change - could this be relevant for ebooks and the like, as these might be subject to some sort of updates/changes after they have been initially downloaded? 1501:. Access dates should not be added to books; what date an editor read a book is irrelevant. Regarding other citation templates used for online sources, we need a URL for an access date to make sense. An access date is the date on which the URL was accessed. 725:

everyone who adds new claims also knows to adjust the access-dates, and if the people who want to insert claims without taking the effort to source them don't also learn to adjust the access-dates to make their changes stick). But it's not a non-problem. —

5289:

None of your primary issues are 'regressions', as in, unintended changes. All of them were deliberate. (I see some other deltas, such as quotation marks, that look like they are because you have not set up your configuration/styles modules all the way.)

2786:

These are the supported identifiers broken up into groups as I understand them. Of the identifiers that are not version-of-record there is a group that is preprints, reviews, self-published sources, etc, and another group that is mostly catalog-like

2143:

Or provide the actual date of publication. Or use another parameter. Or put that information outside of the template explicitly. Or put it in a comment in the date field. Lots of ways to work around it. This particular scenario has showed up before.

4153:

In the rest of world there are many ways of citing a source more than once. The most common way is to use the last name of the author (or authors) and year of publication, to link to the full citation. The easiest way to do this on WP is with the

949:– it represents the last recorded date at which the URL was known to be working (i.e., both not a dead link and also still leading to the cited source). There is no point in recording a "URL still working as of" date when there is no URL. Also, 4633:{{cite web/new |url=http://www.numa.net/expeditions/u-21_1.html |title=Archived copy |access-date=2 November 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081227004917/http://www.numa.net/expeditions/u-21_1.html |archive-date=27 December 2008}} 1986:

There also seems to be a really minor bug here where a space at the end gets injected into the maintenance span. We probably didn't know it was there because of Tidy; Remex doesn't strip internal space from HTML, which is why it is showing up..

750:. I don't know anything about a bot and certainly would not argue that a bot shouldn't be fixed, were that the objection. :) I am just asserting "'accessdate requires URL' because the accessdate is for the URL" has been the use of the parameter 626:

outlines why in details, but it largerly mirrors Jonesey/Izno/David Eppstein's points from above. Books are fixed resources, accessdates are completely pointless for them when there is no url (and even with them they are pretty near pointless).

2184:

So the consensus is: the template is incapable of formatting the date correctly? That's...helpful to know, I suppose. Is there a good reason why we don't have a workaround for "I know this really is a valid date even though it doesn't parse"?

1325:

Ignoring the fact that this rationale has been refuted doesn't magically make it unrefuted. Repeat: The obvious problem with this analysis is that it's our own content that is more likely to change than any URL, very frequently resulting in

1516:

have any estimate about how often a digital-only book might get updated/changed? The access date for a paper source (whether books or other media) is irrelevant, but I wonder whether some ebooks should be treated the same as a website.

941:. The RFC question asserts that this date represents "the last date at which the source was checked as verifying the claims". However, I don't think that is entirely true. It seems to me that – in actual practice, and not withstanding 1743:

I'm not sure we need to duplicate the CSS for the q and cite elements locally, since I don't expect those declarations to be removed from Common.css. Either way, I think this is some CSS that we can add later if we ever remove it from

5101:

or equivalent syntax though. I omitted to mention earlier that in greek (el), perhaps in other languages too, comma is not placed before "and", not only in pairs but also in longer lists. Therefore, the correct output in greek would

1260:- Having a parameter that tells us when someone last checked to see whether a citation actually supports the content is useful... but that is not the purpose of the “access date” parameter. The solution is to create a new parameter. 6526:

Aye, sometimes phabricator is just like that black hole at the back of the laundry where single socks go; I have one there from June 2016. But so what? That doesn't change the fact that the correct place to fix this problem is at

1411:

and above, since this is now a formal RFC. To recap, books and other offline resources are unchanging, it does not matter when you read the book, the words printed in it are no different in 2008 than in 2018. But also if you put a

997:

Nobody should treat access-date as meaning that the cited source and the current wikitext claim were checked for being the related. The meaning of access-date is that you could access the cited source at that time. It is not a

924:– the access date relates to the material located at the URL, and is inappropriate for sources with no URL – it's not to verify when the editor checked, but to indicate which version of a possibly changing web page was accessed. 6509:

I have a bug fix request in Phabricator that is over six months old now. Changes to MediaWiki code are potentially highly disruptive. We should neither expect nor rely on MediaWiki changes, especially if we can handle it here.

5596:

category because all of those sub-categories are intimately tied to the cs1|2 templates and to Help:CS1 errors. Import rather than copy because there are a lot of category pages so if it can be done all in one go, do that. In

5361:

Thanks. I didn't mean to criticize; I didn't mean that these changes were regressions when they were introduced here; I meant that they would become regressions in ruwiki if we just replace the old version with the new one.

6224:

to (1) call "Template:Philippine census reference/strip" to strip the templatestyles from the citation template output, and (2) add the templatestyles back outside of the reference tag. this is a total hack workaround for

4197:

is the name of the magazine/website being cited in footnote 1 and then cited in footnotes 3, 9 and 12, then I'd personally only wikilink to the article on the magazine in the first note and leave it unlinked in the others.

2460:{{cite arxiv |mode=cs2 |vauthors=Abdurakhmanov UU, etal |title=Observation of Gaussian pseudorapidity distributions for produced particles in proton-nucleus collisions at Tevatron energies |arxiv=1807.01234 |class=nucl-ex}} 3779:

is a far more obscure template among the CS1 templates and because it is far more restricted in its parameters. Many editors may also not understand why it matters to use the correct citation template, or otherwise think

2668:

templates. Checking for journal/chapter would also likely be very efficient, so that could be certainly be a simpler alternative. I'd put this in a (hidden) maintenance category, rather than an (visible) error category.

5270:

Of course, it is the responsibility of the ruwiki community to deal with this issue. All I wanted to ask is an advice about the best way to deal with these regressions. Some bot run? Some config edits? Something else?

1855:

Yes, that's true. However, that still introduces duplication with Common.css--readers at other wikis will now need to know to style their q and cite elements in both places otherwise they risk having disparate styles.

1380:

when there's not URL, so it doesn't do anything confusing. Its presence in the wikicode, however, preserves the last verification date with is only something a editor doing WP:V checking is going to care about or see.

1110:

access dates without bothering to check if the text there is actually the same text as the one used for the article, but that has been in the context of careless use of tools (like reFill, which very suggestively does

2409:{{citation |vauthors=Abdurakhmanov UU, etal |title=Observation of Gaussian pseudorapidity distributions for produced particles in proton-nucleus collisions at Tevatron energies |arxiv=1807.01234 |class=nucl-ex}} 6460:, a discussion to which you both have contributed. This is not the place to fix a problem in the MediaWiki code. Reverting the last module suite update will not repair the underlying problem, only mask it. — 5717:

Anyone know? May I add it? I would not have even known it was an option except saw the icon used and was digging around in the code. Are there other parameters that are excluded? Reason for those? Thanks,

6340:

looks like the patch has been merged, so I have removed the hack from the ca. 9 templates that were using it. it could be useful to keep the hack module around in case, or we could probably just delete it.

4465:(names of publications, etc.) that is used multiple times. I don't believe there is any "citation scheme" where one could (for instance) "reference" (cite?) the New York Times only once. But check out 4383:

I was wondering about consensus on it as well; my only hang-up is that it leaves the reference section full of multiple wikilinks to the same page, which is not acceptable in the body of the article. --

6585:. Also that day and on 1 October, developers at MediaWiki confirmed the problem. One of them created a fix that was uploaded for review on 14 October which some here believe will deployed 18 October. 4222:

Well, I read the question slightly differently, there being some ambiguity in the meaning of "works/publications". Yet another example of why I am often askng for more precision in what people mean. ♦

2199:

Elsewhere you rose in opposition when I suggested a form of markup that would instruct the module to accept this-input-as-written. So, no there is no such 'workaround'. You might write that date as

1032:

the date when the resource at that URL was consulted for the article. Otherwise, what's the point of a parameter that says a given URL was live when the content at that URL isn't relevant anymore? –

2630:

to cite an arxiv paper?" The only one I can think of would be for CS2 style (although here the title would be italicized, rather than quoted, and that's I believe wrong). I usually convert those to

590:

revision-controlled world (e.g. edition or version numbers are almost always explicitly changed when the document is changed) do not need an access-date, because they (presumably) do not change. –

3877:

is not to support improper use of the cs1|2 templates but rather, to lend credence to cited preprints using the only template that we have for that purpose. For a long time I have believed that

5424:

You might be able to look through the history of this talk page and the history of edits to the module pages in order to pick out an intermediate version of the template that is more forgiving.

3988:{{cite paper|url=https://fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/R44137.pdf|title=Naval Station Guantanamo Bay: History and Legal Issues Regarding Its Lease Agreements|date=November 17, 2016|work=]|publisher=]}} 793:

Since you retroactively turned our conversation into an RfC (not generally a good idea), I've retroactively edited my comment to add a boldfaced word at the start that makes clear my position. —

275:'s URL. If the access-date is also from 2007 or so, this is an indicator that we may need to check the print source. If the access-date is yesterday, then it's probably sourcing falsification. 212:

in citations (indicating the last date at which the source was checked as verifying the claims for which it was cited) be treated as an error and removed from citations that do not have a URL?

259:

tells us something important: The date at which someone verified that the source cited is a source for the claim appearing in front of that citation. This is one of the ways we can detect

4921:

It's true that "Archived copy" doesn't flag or notify users to fix the missing title. Would you suggest a different wording, or red warning message, or populate a tracking category? --

4144:– typically containing a full citation – is made to appear in more than one place. This implies having each full citation in its own note, and is what leads to those irksome strings of 4086:

Standard (i.e., not just Knowledge) citation practice is that every source used ("cited", "referenced", etc.; the terminology here is quite confused) in an article should have exactly

544:. It's been tiresome for a long time. "The bot won't handle it the way want yet" is a reason to upgrade the bot. The tech tail does not wag the editorial, content verification dog. 5432:

went through the same transition, but it's been a while. You'll have to look back in the edit history, where changes to the module pages and sandbox pages are listed in comments. –

255:. This is a terrible idea. At this point, probably the outright majority of book citations (or at least new ones being added) are via Google Books or otherwise have a URL. The 2758:

AFAICT, arxiv/biorxiv/citeseerx/ssrn are not versions of records. The others are either exclusively (ISBN) or dominantly (DOI) versions of records, or just irrelevant (ISSN).

4879:"All one has to do.." makes the assumption title data is clean, accurate and ready to be cut and pasted into a Knowledge citation. There are all sorts of crazy things in the 1168:

is not required for links to copies of published research papers accessed via DOI or a published book, but should be used for links to news articles on commercial websites'.

2646:

should be, but only when the citation can be determined to be the version of record. IMO the best way to do that is to check for any other version-of-record identifiers in

6614:

and to a handful of other templates. Still, the cs1|2 modules are used on about 3.8 million pages. For the vast majority of those pages, this problem is not a problem.

3550:

There is, I think a better way than the special exception code that I wrote for this (and special exception code is generally bad and should be avoided when possible).

4469:, where the articles from several newspapers are listed under the newspaper, and the name of the paper can be wikilinked independently of any of the included citations. 4544: 1466:

wouldn't help since it's still unknown what revision number is being referred to. In those cases, where revision matters, one should signify the ebook revision number.

3083: 2866: 5249:

is a random sample of cite_journal transclusions in ruwiki; left — current ruwiki version, right — current enwiki version. As can be seen, there are 4 main issues:

4140:" question is commonly seen in the form of "how to 're-use' citations". There are two ways to do this. Most commonly seen at WP is the use of "named-refs", where a 1172:

like various other editors, I use accessdates for book sources...just like I add URLs or quotes for book sources; it's my style, and I do not intend on changing it.

394:. This is still arguably undesirable, because the date info tells us when someone looked at this data and confirmed it as sourcing the claim. I guess it's not a 167:

The objections against the current practice are indisputably well meaning. Supporters of retaining the Access Date in the absence of a URL invoke policies such as

3091: 2874: 1611: 6297: 1080:

January 2006" (NB: not "Checked" or "Verified" or anything like that – just "Retrieved") doesn't work, compared to a URL marked "Retrieved <yesterday: -->

6127:

I think that you are mistaken. The bolding that you describe is not to be understood as an indication of error; it is simply the style that is applied to

3141:

a published version (ISSN, MR, JFM, ZBL), some are VOR/preprints hosted on a specific server (OSTI, HDL), and some are links to specific catalogues (OCLC).

2465:

Abdurakhmanov UU, et al., "Observation of Gaussian pseudorapidity distributions for produced particles in proton-nucleus collisions at Tevatron energies",

4243:

I meant just that, as publisher/work are different fields in citation templates. The repeated wiki-linking of these was mainly what I was referring to. --

6581:

produced duplicate reference definition errors. I learned of the problem on 30 September and on that day diagnosed the problem which caused you to open

4817: 4664: 5320:), having been accessed on that date, which is not the purpose of that parameter. Those cases can be botted. The others should be case-by-case cleaning. 3889:. That, to me just seems like a no-brainer. I did not get any traction with that idea when I last raised it. Imposing that requirement might address 2638:

when I can, so bots interact with them better. Also keep in mind that conference proceedings/book chapters can have arxiv links too, not only journals.

839:'s mis-clarification in edit history), and it too narrowly focusses on your Google Books use case to the detriment of issues such as that brought up by 1105:

Well, if editors need a chance to figure out which dates to focus on when recovering a dead link, then what they actually need it is the date when the

5141: 5031: 4626: 5609:

When you 'flip-the-switch', regardless of how much advance warning you have given, there will be angry editors. There is no getting away from that.

4333: 1115:

are meant to work. If you would like to change the way they're supposed to work, you might want to make a an independent proposal to that effect. –

5408:

Category: CS1 maint: Unrecognized language. It is caused by samples No. 4, 18, 70, where the name of the language is given instead of its code. --

2571:

There is one other conditional that I can think of because the final published article may have been included in a book or conference proceeding:

2246:

This is an arxiv-specific parameter, which is only useful when citing the preprints version. The only template that should support/display it is

5614:

If you need help with technical issues or you see places where the cs1|2 internationalization support can be improved, give a shout. Good luck.

6456:

was not broken by the 29 September update to the cs1|2 module suite. Rather, the problem lies with the MediaWiki software. I said as much at

1408: 623: 497: 449: 1181:

include an accessdate and the cite does not already include a URL, then there will be a big red error code in the references section stating '

427:. This is a good compromise. Don't actually need the a-dates to be rendered in absence of a URL, but people shouldn't be nuking them either. 6050: 4038: 3055: 2887: 659:

The obvious problem with this analysis is that it's our own content that is more likely to change than any URL, very frequently resulting in

94: 86: 81: 69: 64: 59: 5135:

or equivalent message would allow greater flexibility to satisfy both cases, with or without comma before "and", by modifing it accordingly.

6221: 4866: 3071: 3063: 2899: 2895: 3717:

I just recently noticed this change due to the deprecation error note showing up while editing the upcoming "Recent research" feature for

5529:

supported the text our article. Identifier sources, doi, pmc, etc are 'permanent' so will not be changing unlike many web-based sources.

6149: 6113: 3936: 3839: 3009: 2831: 1152: 5428:, for example, was deprecated but still supported for a while, and then after a long while, support was removed entirely. I think that 4257:

The term "references" is best avoided as having too many possible meanings, which are rarely (ever?) specified. E.g., where you said "

3789:

That is likely not the case for some editors, especially those with only a basic grasp on MediaWiki markup.It is my understanding that

478:

If I am not mistaken it was removed because the archive bot doesn't work for them and gives us dead links if there is an access date.--

6319: 5733:

Probably because I / we suck at documentation. Any help that can be had making the cs1|2 documentation better is gratefully accepted.

4908: 3017: 3005: 2903: 2827: 2071:

that "Fall 1988 – Winter 1989" would mean something different or at the least much more ambiguous, so is not sufficiently accurate.) —

990:

is empty, as the relevant "URL" might be one of the identifiers. I don't really care whether bots or AWB scripts keep or remove them.

5972: 5588:

If after reading all of that you still wish to proceed, I would strongly recommend that you do a careful and complete translation of

1143:: I'm not sure about using accessdates for sources without a URL, although I have done it and don't see it as problematic. But, like 847:(which is a wide issue worth debating properly), but you've phrased it as a question about a simple technical issue. The issue isn't 6238: 5010: 4011: 2708:

to cite an arXiv preprint makes any sense. I don't think it does because the rendering is incorrect as is the template's metadata:

2034: 1592: 1392: 1341: 818: 783: 674: 555: 520: 438: 414: 352: 286: 224: 5253:

error regarding unrecognized language and tracking categories for sources in particular languages with mixed English-Russian names;

1638: 772:

Opening this as an RfC since I'm being revert warred on dispute tags trying to draw additional eyes and minds to the discussion.

5662:, a template that has not been edited for almost a year. Should this be fixed in the template or in the CS1 modules? Thanks. – 3050: 2878: 1686: 2089:

indicates the template does not support season ranges. So live with the false error message, or don't use citation templates.

1070:: defines access-date: "Full date when the content pointed to by url was last verified to support the text in the article". – 6566: 5937: 5881: 5829: 5604:

value so that general editors in the ru.wiki community who don't have English can understand what all of that red text means.

4744: 4564: 4006: 3199: 2768: 2679: 2416:

Observation of Gaussian pseudorapidity distributions for produced particles in proton-nucleus collisions at Tevatron energies

2359: 2276: 2223: 1835: 1559: 1427: 1284: 706: 637: 323: 127: 5598: 1651: 1538:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

6162:

It is the convention that cs1|2 has used for journal cites for a very long time, in fact, the bolding was present in the

4791: 4638: 2385:

to cite an arxiv paper? Because arxiv papers have not been published, there is no 'journal' or other periodical to tell

1204:" Since then, I have employed Trappist the monk's style of no accessdate for book sources (using the vauthors template). 6261: 3719: 2663: 266: 260: 3927:. It's entirely reasonable and I think justifies the deprecation; this change does not seem as such a loss to me now. — 1901:

is undefined so that editors may show or hide cs1|2 error messages using their own personal css (vaguely documented at

6622: 6535: 6500: 6465: 6184: 6139: 6061: 5858: 5741: 5622: 5208: 5158: 5085: 4831: 4711: 4622: 4049: 3912: 3707: 3696: 3675: 3243: 3225: 2963: 2731: 2613: 2335: 2211: 2132: 2049: 1940: 1846: 1728: 147: 5871:

Well, this should be deployed now, not in weeks. Thousands if not hundreds of thousands of citations are now borked.

5975:

has been empty for some time (and spurred by a comment Ttm made when he added support for enumerated interviewers).

5758:{{cite journal |last=Smith |first=J. |year=1948–1950 |title=Foobar |journal=Whatever |pages=1654–1055}}</pre: --> 6570: 6457: 6148:

Ok, my mistake then. Are you sure that this is according to an existing convention that most users can understand?

5848: 5190: 4683:{{cite web/new |url=http://www.numa.net/expeditions/u-21_1.html |title=Archived copy |access-date=2 November 2008}} 1717: 1679: 1669: 1644: 1632: 1579: 1569: 1563: 47: 38: 17: 6241:) and the fact that the templatestyles is at the end. so, please let me know if you have a better solution or if 3956: 3001: 2819: 1701: 1230: 807:

I did as well. And RfC stuff happens this way all the time. No one cares, as long as the question is clear. :-)

103: 5796: 5681:

is the problem in each of these. I would guess these are also causing lint errors on their respective pages. --

4846:??? This is a web page citation. The particular web page has a title, all one has to do is look at the source: 4536: 3753: 2190: 2076: 1585: 1209: 798: 730: 576: 541: 184:

Objections regarding technical difficulties, such as the adjustment of bot functions, can be discounted since

163:

full date when the content pointed to by URL was last verified to support the text in the article; requires URL

4870: 1024:

Well, the access-date parameter indicates the date that the source was last checked, so in a way it gives you

986:

If a URL is not present, the access-date should not display. It should not necessarily display an error when

6597: 6153: 6117: 6043: 5246: 6618: 6531: 6496: 6461: 6180: 6135: 6057: 6013: 5986: 5854: 5814: 5737: 5638: 5618: 5413: 5367: 5279: 5204: 5154: 5081: 4827: 4761: 4722: 4707: 4582: 4045: 3932: 3924: 3908: 3835: 3724: 3703: 3671: 3658: 3221: 3184: 3153: 2959: 2943: 2727: 2609: 2331: 2207: 2128: 2045: 1936: 1842: 1724: 1222: 1196: 929: 6194:

template assumes the convention is something the template doesn't understand, and the value is not bolded.

4912: 1711: 1522: 1192: 1090: 1052: 1015: 974: 962: 4547:). This should be tracked and worked on, to replace with the real webpage title, manually or with a bot. 6593: 6576: 6565:

MediaWiki enabled TemplateStyles at en.wiki 19 July 2018. On that same day I created what would become

6475:

You're saying that there was a change to the MediaWiki software on that date which should be reverted?

6451: 6407: 6171: 6088: 5776: 5634: 5409: 5363: 5275: 5238: 5186: 3895: 3884: 3853: 3812: 3783: 3763: 3743: 3650: 2302: 2086: 1389: 1338: 815: 780: 671: 552: 517: 435: 411: 349: 283: 221: 6359:

the one who made significant contributions, you can submit it for author-only CSD. I'd support that. --

5316:

Many times this is due to a non-web resource, or a web-resource with a permanent ID of some sort (e.g.

4090:"full citation", with all of the bibilogrpahic details as my be useful in finding and identifying the 341:

I must be losing my mind. I just had it fail for me within the hour. Will see if I can replicate it.

5723: 4495: 4388: 4319: 4270: 4248: 4227: 4206: 4169: 4076: 4067: 4022: 3087: 3033: 2870: 2843: 1226: 886: 6414: 6296:

excellent, once that is merged, I will orphan the module and have it deleted. until that happens,

6230: 5906: 5700: 5667: 5437: 5137: 5027: 4590: 3861: 3820: 3796: 3773: 3527: 3263: 2633: 2250: 2186: 2171: 2072: 1551: 1453: 1205: 836: 794: 726: 595: 572: 537: 197: 5466:

The unrecognized language issue occurs because at ru.wiki, the code expects the value assigned to

1274:

There is zero need for such a parameter. The words in books don't change when you put them away.

1164:

states that this parameter is 'Not required for linked documents that do not change. For example,

6556: 6516: 6481: 6439: 6423: 6346: 6330: 6305: 6279: 6269: 6250: 5933: 5877: 5825: 5448: 5218: 4730: 4550: 4309: 3513: 3459: 3414: 3368: 3322: 3276: 3195: 3137:

Some are vendor-specific (ASIN), some are often but not always VoRs (BIBCODE), some are material

2764: 2675: 2466: 2419: 2355: 2272: 2014: 1969: 1950:

messages which are already captured there. That's a bit above my skill level though right now. --

1917: 1423: 1314: 1280: 1265: 1199:, who deals with a lot reference cleanup, is against accessdates for books. He stated, in part, " 1186: 1161: 1043: 925: 702: 633: 373: 319: 271:

on it, when it may in fact really be in that book, just not visible right now at that particular

250: 4453:

Jc3s5h: it appears you are under the same misunderstanding I was. He wasn't asking about repeat

3928: 3831: 2377:

With the restrictions that you suggest, is there any real reason to support the notion of using

6626: 6560: 6539: 6521: 6504: 6486: 6469: 6443: 6428: 6368: 6350: 6334: 6309: 6291: 6273: 6254: 6203: 6188: 6157: 6143: 6121: 6079: 6065: 5950: 5910: 5894: 5862: 5842: 5745: 5727: 5704: 5690: 5671: 5642: 5626: 5441: 5417: 5403: 5385: 5371: 5356: 5283: 5221: 5212: 5194: 5162: 5145: 5089: 5035: 4936: 4916: 4899: 4874: 4835: 4781: 4751: 4715: 4615: 4594: 4571: 4499: 4432: 4414: 4392: 4371: 4345: 4323: 4274: 4252: 4231: 4215: 4173: 4080: 4053: 4032: 3940: 3916: 3843: 3711: 3679: 3229: 3212: 2967: 2781: 2735: 2692: 2617: 2372: 2339: 2289: 2235: 2215: 2194: 2175: 2153: 2136: 2098: 2080: 2053: 1996: 1959: 1944: 1865: 1850: 1829: 1732: 1526: 1507: 1493: 1478:

for immutable sources, or sources that change according to revision ID (see comment above). --

1457: 1440: 1397: 1367: 1346: 1318: 1297: 1269: 1252: 1234: 1213: 1119: 1094: 1074: 1056: 1036: 1019: 978: 933: 916: 895: 864: 823: 802: 788: 767: 734: 719: 679: 650: 613: 599: 580: 560: 525: 487: 465: 443: 419: 357: 336: 291: 229: 201: 5659: 5652: 4862: 4855: 4811: 4658: 4466: 4112: 4102: 3473: 3427: 3381: 3335: 3289: 3255: 3217:

Restored my original table as a point of comparison for when I can return to this topic later.

3095: 3025: 2915: 2882: 2703: 2650: 2625: 2432: 2380: 2260: 1518: 1116: 1086: 1071: 1067: 1048: 1033: 1011: 970: 504: 158: 3695:

as a parameter accepted by all cs1|2 templates is deprecated. The special exception code in

6199: 5945: 5889: 5837: 4929: 4892: 4774: 4608: 4428: 4350:

The rough consensus I'm seeing out of these discussions is actually (surprisingly to me) to

3207: 2776: 2687: 2367: 2284: 2094: 1834:

That code is there for all of the other wikis that use the cs1|2 modules (as the comment in

1486: 1435: 1384: 1360: 1333: 1327: 1292: 1248: 1175: 1156: 1144: 830: 810: 775: 714: 666: 660: 645: 547: 512: 430: 406: 400: 344: 331: 278: 216: 172: 105: 3246:

so that it emits an error message for the last three of the conditions I identified above:

6026: 5999: 5789: 5719: 5589: 4851:. Conveniently, this is also the cited web page's rendered heading. The documentation for 4506: 4491: 4490:

I generally agree with Xover, except that I am usually too lazy to wikilink everything. ♦

4410: 4399: 4384: 4367: 4315: 4297: 4266: 4244: 4238: 4223: 4201: 4188: 4180: 4165: 4072: 4019: 3539: 3486: 3440: 3394: 3348: 3302: 2445: 2027: 1978: 1926: 1902: 1513: 1502: 912: 881: 860: 493: 461: 456:

should be deleted as being of no use and/or contradictory to the change you've just made.

453: 389: 6395: 6242: 6226: 6233:. clearly this is a fragile hack fix since it relies on the format and position of the 3358:{{citation/new |arxiv=1705.01263 |class=hep-ph |title=Title |encyclopedia=Encyclopedia}} 2723:

Do we have a list of cs1|2 supported identifiers that are version-of-record identifiers?

108: 6364: 6287: 6075: 6039: 5941: 5902: 5885: 5833: 5696: 5686: 5663: 5496:

wrote AWB scripts that trolled through one or more of the error categories and rewrote

5433: 5399: 5381: 5352: 4586: 4341: 3999:"Naval Station Guantanamo Bay: History and Legal Issues Regarding Its Lease Agreements" 3203: 3021: 2839: 2772: 2683: 2363: 2280: 2231: 2167: 2149: 1992: 1955: 1861: 1825: 1449: 1431: 1288: 763: 710: 641: 609: 591: 483: 327: 193: 178: 5555:

was included in the metadata. For this same reason, the value assigned to the plural

3801:

CS1 templates because the purpose of that parameter is to provide some indication of "

6552: 6511: 6476: 6435: 6418: 6356: 6342: 6326: 6301: 6265: 6246: 5929: 5873: 5821: 5713:

Url-access parameter for Cite encyclopedia – Reason missing from full parameter list?

5021:

which would be useful in this case. Is it possible to enable these local messages in

4736: 4556: 4303:

more than one time (i.e. suppose an article references three different articles from

4158: 3728: 3191: 3067: 2823: 2760: 2671: 2351: 2268: 1419: 1310: 1276: 1261: 698: 629: 315: 185: 168: 3619:

While not discussed, and presumably not contemplated, there is a similar issue with

6592:

The broken code is not in TemplateStyles and is not in cs1|2 but is in MediaWiki's

5593: 4513: 3116: 3079: 2911: 6582: 4265:

of full citations to different sources. Well, that is good question; see below. ♦

4041:

removed parentheses from the publisher rendering. I've tweaked the documentation.

107: 6195: 4922: 4885: 4767: 4601: 4424: 3450:{{cite web/new |arxiv=1705.01263 |class=hep-ph |title=Title |url=//example.com}} 3150:

USENETID included here for completeness though it is only properly supported by

2940:

USENETID included here for completeness though it is only properly supported by

2090: 1623: 1479: 1353: 1244: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

4795: 4688: 4642: 4420: 4406: 4378: 4363: 4127:

tags in the text. But you may note that many articles will collect all these

3588:

alias (both indicative of publication), I believe that there is no reason for

3496:{{cite arxiv/new |author=Author |arxiv=1705.01263 |class=hep-ph |title=Title}} 3404:{{citation/new |arxiv=1705.01263 |class=hep-ph |title=Title |chapter=Chapter}} 3312:{{citation/new |arxiv=1705.01263 |class=hep-ph |title=Title |journal=Journal}} 905: 856: 840: 457: 4543:"? Since no webpage is named this, but we still have over 100,000 such hits ( 1547:

I intend to update the live modules over the weekend of 29–30 September 2018

6360: 6283: 6071: 6035: 5682: 5395: 5394:

I don't see an error regarding languages. Do you have an example of that? --

5377: 5348: 5338:. If that's a pain point (say your coauthors are separated inconsistently), 4337: 3998: 3046: 2862: 2227: 2145: 1988: 1951: 1882: 1857: 1821: 759: 605: 479: 6390: 2349:

takes precedence over the arxiv version, so that information is pointless.

5376:

No worries--it was clear from context you didn't meant to criticize :). --

3983:

edit, I observed that this does not seem to be the case. My citation was:

6260:

Update, since this is a broader problem, I have implemented something in

3128:

Usually, e.g. CiteSeerX is sometimes updated to host a published version.

2456:

Of course, editors will make up something though the better solution is:

1047:

to news.yahoo.com links, all of which expired after a couple of weeks?)

950: 4581:(a sample size of one), it looks like you might want to file a bug with 1762:/* Reset italic styling set by user agent (only for cs1|2 templates; the 6278:

So a patch was uploaded but not merged which I expect will come on the

6105: 4987:

When it contains three or more values the final two are separated with

3112: 3059: 3042: 2891: 2858: 1221:

Under Verfiability policy, verifiability is not the same as access per

5470:

to be Russian orthography or ISO 639-1 code (Latn script); instead of

5927:

That's articles. Multiple citations per articles increase the count.

5525:

as a date that the citing editor confirmed that the source linked by

5178: 3029: 2848: 2113:{{cite journal |title=Title |journal=Journal |date=Fall–Winter 1988}} 1189:, but URLs to books are, and so books with URLs need accessdates too. 3558:

whitelist which makes it available to all cs1|2 templates. Because

1584:

fix false-positive suggestion for limited parameter list templates;

5041:

Thanks for pointing out that omission. Fixed in the sandbox using

3518: 3464: 3419: 3373: 3327: 3281: 2471: 2424: 2162:

parameter to give the "cover" issue date description above and use

5592:. I don't know if it is possible but if it is, import the entire 5098:

Thank you for your fast response, I would like to insist in using

4185:

your comments don't answer the OP's question as I read it at all.

3038: 3013: 2854: 2835: 2106: 6034:

The category can be deleted when the sandbox is next deployed. --

1376:

There's no need for a new parameter when this one works fine. It

758:

during conversion to Lua (and categorization somewhere later). --

5182: 5009:

There is not an option to modify or translate the separators in

4118:

template. The most common practice on WP is to drop them into a

3809:". Given that preprints are frequently cited as preprints using 3633:

will not correctly render preprints with these identifiers when

3075: 2907: 6300:

is becoming more useful (down from over 5K entries yesterday).

6264:, which appears to work as well, but seems to be less fragile. 1543:

update to the live cS1|2 module weekend of 29–30 September 2018

6108:, for example. Or really any article citing lots of journals. 182:

mistake), is not a significant factor in online-source search.

109: 25: 4675:'Archived copy' is not recognized as an 'invalid' title when 3850:

Given that preprints are frequently cited as preprints using

3250:{{citation/new |arxiv=1705.01263 |class=hep-ph |title=Title}} 1838:

points out); en.wiki's common.css is not shared by all wikis.

4164:

family of templates. And that is all I have time for now. ♦

509:

without the required URL parameter, and so forth and so on.

5347:

You ECd with me so my bullets refer only to the later 3. --

4965:

contains two values, in the output they are separated with

6458:

Template_talk:Inflation/fn#duplicate_reference_definitions

5849:

Help talk:Citation Style 1#ndash entity in pages parameter

4193:

if multiple citations all come from the same publication,

6325:

has resolved itself, so the patch may already be live. --

4621:

I have added case-insensitive detection of this title to

2622:"is there any real reason to support the notion of using 2311:? Isn't what you really want a restriction that rejects 498:

Category:Pages using citations with accessdate and no URL

450:

Category:Pages using citations with accessdate and no URL

6417:

on 29 September. Can we revert it until we have a fix?

5217:

The complaint was about the documentation (now fixed).

4336:

at a venue marginally more appropriate than this one. --

6164: 5899: 4578: 3980: 3870:

conflict with the whole purpose of using the parameter?

1893: 1887: 954: 946: 942: 755: 751: 533: 425: 6434:

At least a few other templates were affected, too. --

6229:

which was triggered when templatestyles were added to

2955:

Is this a correct categorization of these identifiers?

1183:

reference error: accessdate= requires url= (see: help)

843:. What you're really asking about is the semantics of 622:

Accessdates without URL should absolutely be removed.

5808:

Smith, J. (1948–1950). "Foobar". Whatever: 1654–1055.

298: 1309:

of our article was last checked against the source.

448:

if this change is agreed then the tracking category

126:

The following discussion is an archived record of a

5967:I have removed support from the sandbox module for 5601:at a minimum, translate the error messages and the 4880: 4847: 4766:- it appears "Archive copy" is also being used. -- 3873:is only just marginally adequate). The purpose of 3848:This, I think is the only question that you asked: 3647:should not be used as a pseudo-cs2 versions of the 1631:not supported with oldest arxiv identifier format; 136:

No further edits should be made to this discussion.

5559:is also not included in the metadata. Converting 3612:error without the need for special exception code. 1905:; and certainly not to turn error messages green. 1409:User talk:CitationCleanerBot/Archive 1#Accessdates 624:User_talk:CitationCleanerBot/Archive_1#Accessdates 5064:{{cite book/new |title=Title |language=fr,de,it}} 5025:? I regularly update CS1 modules in el.wikipedia. 1903:Help:CS1_errors#Controlling_error_message_display 1696:not supported with oldest arxiv identifier format 5973:Category:CS1 maint: Uses interviewers parameter‎ 5313:). Others should probably be case-by-case fixes. 5259:"access-date" requires "url" and emits an error; 3562:applies only to preprint sources, and only when 3455: 2698:title would be italicized, rather than quoted... 1149:I do prefer to use accessdates for book sources. 4728: 4548: 3995: 3985: 3961: 983:A slightly more specific response than yes/no: 5512:. Were it me, I would do the same at ru.wiki. 5049:{{cite book/new |title=Title |language=fr,de}} 4545:Special:Search/insource:/title\=Archived copy/ 4539:for when the title of a citation template is " 3866:CS1 template, does the current deprecation of 3825:CS1 template, does the current deprecation of 492:So, fix the bot. Agreed that the material at 6608:Editor Frietjes has applied a clever hack to 6298:Category:Pages with duplicate reference_names 6131:values that are shorter than five characters. 5517:Our documentation here has always associated 5200:Can you show a live example of what you mean? 4461:, but duplicate wikilinking (to articles) of 3967:changes the formatting of other parameters: 3951:Work parameter and format of other parameters 2166:to specify when it was actually published. – 1568:detect and categorize 'Archive copy' titles; 692:You cannot hijack a non-websource, so again, 139:A summary of the conclusions reached follows. 8: 5114:{{cite book|title=Title |language=fr,de,it}} 4996:{{cite book|title=Title |language=fr,de,it}} 3580:in the correct format without it also has a 2242:Remove |class= from non-cite arxiv templates 2224:here and a discussion linked therein as well 1462:Ebooks can have revision numbers. However a 501:sifted through for, e.g., erroneous uses of 5547:so none of the authors listed in either of 4727:Looks good! Anyway to implement this live? 1619:detect and categorize 'Archive copy' titles 5262:"coauthors" is ignored and emits an error. 5013:. However, it contains two local messages 2482:I think that the problem then reduces to: 1616:implemented Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css 6216:Hacking around templatestyles and T205803 4974:{{cite book|title=Title |language=fr,de}} 4627:Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration/sandbox 3691:there having been no further discussion, 3517: 3463: 3418: 3372: 3326: 3280: 2470: 2423: 1240:Conditional treat lack of URL as correct. 1223:Knowledge:Verifiability#Access to sources 1159:(then known as Coconutporkpie) told me, " 4625:and added a new maintenance category to 4259:subsequent references from the same work 2983: 2801: 2395:. Without a periodical type parameter, 754:in Citation/core. The warning was added 3104: 1643:last 3 hidden error messages unhidden; 362:Ah, it's failing when there is no URL: 161:are quite clear: "Access date" is the 6128: 6100:in the citation, to mark the mistake. 6022: 6011: 5995: 5984: 5968: 5785: 5774: 5678: 5580: 5568: 5564: 5560: 5556: 5552: 5548: 5539: 5535: 5526: 5522: 5518: 5509: 5505: 5501: 5497: 5492: 5488: 5479: 5475: 5471: 5467: 5429: 5425: 5339: 5327: 5323: 5317: 5310: 5306: 5302: 5298: 5294: 5256:"month" is ignored and emits an error; 4816:: CS1 maint: archived copy as title ( 4809: 4676: 4663:: CS1 maint: archived copy as title ( 4656: 4258: 4137: 3891:arXiv citations being formatted using 3890: 3878: 3874: 3867: 3849: 3826: 3806: 3802: 3790: 3736: 3732: 3692: 3664: 3638: 3634: 3624: 3620: 3601: 3585: 3581: 3577: 3567: 3563: 3559: 3551: 3535: 3525: 3505: 3482: 3471: 3436: 3425: 3390: 3379: 3344: 3333: 3298: 3287: 2697: 2657: 2643: 2639: 2589: 2585: 2581: 2552: 2528: 2524: 2520: 2496: 2492: 2441: 2430: 2402: 2392: 2345: 2324: 2320: 2316: 2312: 2308: 2296: 2266:if no other identifiers are declared. 2200: 2163: 2159: 2023: 2012: 1983:. <- fixed, and the example above. 1967: 1915: 1789:/* Straight quote marks for <q: --> 1765:reason for the .citation qualifier) */ 1693: 1675: 1665: 1659: 1628: 1604: 1600: 1475: 1463: 1413: 987: 848: 844: 693: 586: 385: 381: 371: 272: 256: 244: 209: 189: 162: 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 6413:was apparently broken by a change to 2656:(so not CiteSeerX or SSRN), and kill 2222:On an aside, this has been discussed 1028:the date that the URL was last live, 604:I agree broadly with these points. -- 159:instructions about citing web sources 7: 6222:Template:Philippine census reference 6091:- Mistaken use of attribute "Volume" 5658:There is a new stripmarker error in 5599:ru:Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration 4060:Repeat linking of works/publications 696:makes no sense when there's no URL. 532:Alright, so Izno's reverted me here 6245:is fixed so I can undo my changes. 5534:We elected to deprecate and remove 5487:We elected to deprecate and remove 4123: 3881:should be a required parameter for 6262:Module:Citation/CS1/templatestyles 5963:Removed support for 'interviewers' 4332:There was some discussion of this 3594:to act as a pseudo-cs2 version of 2700:Yeah, that's why I asked if using 835:But the question isn't clear (see 190:assist human editors in their work 24: 6239:Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration 5767:Smith, J. (1948–1950). "Foobar". 5695:That fix works for me. Thanks. – 5173:"Dashes in the ISBN are optional" 5072:(in French, German, and Italian). 5011:Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration 5004:(in French, German, and Italian). 4849:Story of the U-21 </title: --> 4012:Federation of American Scientists 1593:Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration 165:. Emphasis on the last sentence. 5121:(in French, German and Italian). 3260:used as a pseudo-cs2 version of 1534:The discussion above is closed. 1352:not the same as access-date. -- 29: 4098:are most often created using a 1687:Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers 994:for cite book and cite journal. 6567:Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css 4836:12:46, 23 September 2018 (UTC) 4782:12:31, 23 September 2018 (UTC) 4372:07:38, 30 September 2018 (UTC) 4346:06:34, 30 September 2018 (UTC) 4324:01:40, 30 September 2018 (UTC) 4216:01:14, 30 September 2018 (UTC) 4174:00:23, 30 September 2018 (UTC) 4081:20:29, 29 September 2018 (UTC) 4007:Congressional Research Service 3917:22:04, 30 September 2018 (UTC) 3844:20:11, 30 September 2018 (UTC) 3735:parameter whenever also using 3712:10:45, 15 September 2018 (UTC) 2344:Basically the only reason for 2236:21:39, 30 September 2018 (UTC) 2216:11:55, 30 September 2018 (UTC) 2195:19:35, 29 September 2018 (UTC) 2176:16:10, 29 September 2018 (UTC) 2154:15:28, 29 September 2018 (UTC) 2137:11:55, 30 September 2018 (UTC) 2099:14:42, 29 September 2018 (UTC) 2081:21:13, 28 September 2018 (UTC) 2054:16:28, 29 September 2018 (UTC) 1997:16:01, 29 September 2018 (UTC) 1960:15:45, 29 September 2018 (UTC) 1945:15:36, 29 September 2018 (UTC) 1866:15:49, 29 September 2018 (UTC) 1851:16:51, 23 September 2018 (UTC) 1836:Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css 1830:15:53, 23 September 2018 (UTC) 1733:11:50, 23 September 2018 (UTC) 1560:Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css 202:08:00, 29 September 2018 (UTC) 155:Yes, keep the current practice 1: 4537:CS1 maintenance error message 4535:Can somebody please create a 3641:aliases are not set. Again, 1652:Module:Citation/CS1/Whitelist 1382: 1331: 1195:2017 discussion, we see that 808: 773: 664: 545: 510: 428: 404: 342: 276: 214: 6627:11:26, 15 October 2018 (UTC) 6561:09:51, 15 October 2018 (UTC) 6540:22:56, 14 October 2018 (UTC) 6522:20:36, 14 October 2018 (UTC) 6505:20:06, 14 October 2018 (UTC) 6487:19:44, 14 October 2018 (UTC) 6470:10:39, 14 October 2018 (UTC) 6444:01:55, 14 October 2018 (UTC) 6429:22:54, 13 October 2018 (UTC) 6369:00:50, 19 October 2018 (UTC) 6351:23:46, 18 October 2018 (UTC) 6335:15:24, 17 October 2018 (UTC) 6310:17:34, 14 October 2018 (UTC) 6292:16:47, 14 October 2018 (UTC) 6274:14:15, 14 October 2018 (UTC) 6255:16:18, 13 October 2018 (UTC) 6204:16:44, 17 October 2018 (UTC) 6189:16:30, 17 October 2018 (UTC) 6158:16:26, 17 October 2018 (UTC) 6144:16:24, 17 October 2018 (UTC) 6122:16:17, 17 October 2018 (UTC) 6080:12:54, 15 October 2018 (UTC) 6066:12:07, 15 October 2018 (UTC) 6044:04:54, 15 October 2018 (UTC) 5951:23:03, 13 October 2018 (UTC) 5911:07:33, 12 October 2018 (UTC) 5895:21:48, 11 October 2018 (UTC) 5863:21:38, 11 October 2018 (UTC) 5843:21:24, 11 October 2018 (UTC) 5746:22:15, 10 October 2018 (UTC) 5728:21:33, 10 October 2018 (UTC) 5705:08:18, 10 October 2018 (UTC) 5691:05:15, 10 October 2018 (UTC) 5672:04:41, 10 October 2018 (UTC) 4467:2014_Oso_mudslide#References 3975:are enclosed in parentheses. 3805:" the preprint when citing " 3803:the moderation involved with 1185:'. Books are not subject to 192:and not to shape the work. 6492:templatestyles and T205803. 5962: 5643:14:43, 9 October 2018 (UTC) 5627:14:24, 9 October 2018 (UTC) 5442:14:23, 9 October 2018 (UTC) 5418:14:20, 9 October 2018 (UTC) 5404:14:10, 9 October 2018 (UTC) 5386:14:46, 9 October 2018 (UTC) 5372:14:20, 9 October 2018 (UTC) 5357:14:05, 9 October 2018 (UTC) 5284:12:30, 9 October 2018 (UTC) 5230:Regressions: advice request 5222:11:07, 9 October 2018 (UTC) 5213:10:03, 9 October 2018 (UTC) 5195:09:41, 9 October 2018 (UTC) 5163:22:29, 7 October 2018 (UTC) 5146:21:28, 7 October 2018 (UTC) 5090:19:38, 7 October 2018 (UTC) 5036:19:06, 7 October 2018 (UTC) 4937:15:13, 6 October 2018 (UTC) 4917:14:57, 6 October 2018 (UTC) 4900:14:36, 5 October 2018 (UTC) 4875:14:07, 5 October 2018 (UTC) 4752:18:10, 20 August 2018 (UTC) 4623:Module:Citation/CS1/sandbox 4500:21:59, 2 October 2018 (UTC) 4433:14:08, 2 October 2018 (UTC) 4415:08:17, 2 October 2018 (UTC) 4393:04:28, 2 October 2018 (UTC) 4275:21:49, 2 October 2018 (UTC) 4253:04:28, 2 October 2018 (UTC) 4232:00:10, 2 October 2018 (UTC) 4054:09:46, 1 October 2018 (UTC) 4033:08:57, 1 October 2018 (UTC) 3941:05:46, 1 October 2018 (UTC) 3793:has been deprecated in non- 3697:Module:Citation/CS1/sandbox 3680:14:52, 24 August 2018 (UTC) 3498:– no error message because 3244:Module:Citation/CS1/sandbox 3230:14:30, 22 August 2018 (UTC) 3213:13:55, 22 August 2018 (UTC) 2968:13:21, 22 August 2018 (UTC) 2319:is not present? But isn't 1170:" I told Sangdeboeuf that " 568:Yes, keep current behavior. 153:The result is by consensus 6645: 6594:mw:Extension:Cite/Cite.php 6388: 3923:Thank you for your input, 3807:the preprint as a preprint 2782:15:12, 1 August 2018 (UTC) 2736:14:16, 1 August 2018 (UTC) 2414:Abdurakhmanov UU, et al., 2066:How do I format this date? 2033:CS1 maint: date and year ( 1738:Cite and q element styling 1527:06:46, 4 August 2018 (UTC) 1472:Yes, keep current behavior 1219:Yes, keep present behavior 1178:agreed with me, stating, " 1120:09:21, 5 August 2018 (UTC) 1095:06:43, 4 August 2018 (UTC) 1075:12:40, 2 August 2018 (UTC) 1057:05:30, 1 August 2018 (UTC) 939:Yes, keep present behavior 18:Help talk:Citation Style 1 6320:Certification Table Entry 5651:New stripmarker error in 4716:12:17, 30 July 2018 (UTC) 4616:02:02, 24 July 2018 (UTC) 4595:00:22, 24 July 2018 (UTC) 4572:21:44, 23 July 2018 (UTC) 4122:(footnote) created using 3101: 2693:19:54, 24 July 2018 (UTC) 2642:should never be ignored. 2618:15:30, 24 July 2018 (UTC) 2493:|journal=<not set: --> 2373:14:09, 24 July 2018 (UTC) 2340:13:51, 24 July 2018 (UTC) 2295:Are you sure? Shouldn't 2290:13:15, 24 July 2018 (UTC) 1909:{{cite book/new |title=}} 1702:Module:Citation/CS1/COinS 1508:15:37, 28 July 2018 (UTC) 1499:Yes, treat it as an error 1494:14:49, 28 July 2018 (UTC) 1458:14:08, 28 July 2018 (UTC) 1441:12:41, 28 July 2018 (UTC) 1414:|access-date=28 July 2018 1398:14:29, 28 July 2018 (UTC) 1368:14:56, 28 July 2018 (UTC) 1347:14:29, 28 July 2018 (UTC) 1319:22:11, 28 July 2018 (UTC) 1298:12:43, 28 July 2018 (UTC) 1270:12:31, 28 July 2018 (UTC) 1253:11:13, 28 July 2018 (UTC) 1235:09:42, 28 July 2018 (UTC) 1214:08:46, 28 July 2018 (UTC) 1037:16:17, 28 July 2018 (UTC) 1020:16:06, 28 July 2018 (UTC) 979:06:49, 28 July 2018 (UTC) 934:06:34, 28 July 2018 (UTC) 917:05:42, 28 July 2018 (UTC) 896:05:35, 28 July 2018 (UTC) 865:06:17, 28 July 2018 (UTC) 824:05:21, 28 July 2018 (UTC) 803:04:49, 28 July 2018 (UTC) 789:04:36, 28 July 2018 (UTC) 768:00:43, 28 July 2018 (UTC) 735:01:43, 30 July 2018 (UTC) 720:00:31, 30 July 2018 (UTC) 680:05:26, 28 July 2018 (UTC) 651:01:29, 28 July 2018 (UTC) 614:00:55, 28 July 2018 (UTC) 600:00:35, 28 July 2018 (UTC) 585:My understanding is that 581:00:27, 28 July 2018 (UTC) 561:00:05, 28 July 2018 (UTC) 526:23:10, 27 July 2018 (UTC) 488:20:20, 27 July 2018 (UTC) 466:20:25, 27 July 2018 (UTC) 444:20:12, 27 July 2018 (UTC) 420:20:06, 27 July 2018 (UTC) 358:19:58, 27 July 2018 (UTC) 337:19:22, 27 July 2018 (UTC) 292:19:20, 27 July 2018 (UTC) 243:. Somehow we've lost the 230:04:36, 28 July 2018 (UTC) 3731:. I usually include the 3608:whitelist will give the 3111:Usually, e.g. there are 1747: 1536:Please do not modify it. 133:Please do not modify it. 6282:software deployment. -- 5633:Thank you very much! -- 5326:is preferably split to 5057:(in French and German). 4982:(in French and German). 4863:Template:Cite Web#Title 4419:I generally agree with 4352:link everything, always 4131:into their own section. 2714:&rft.genre=preprint 1897:, are you sure? Class 1155:brief 2016 discussion, 6089:Template: Cite journal 5784:Check date values in: 5311:|date=(day) month year 5234:In Russian Knowledge, 4017: 3991: 3977: 3268:(has malformed title) 2201:|date=Fall–Winter 1988 1474:It's confusing to use 1405:Keep current behaviour 1258:Create a new parameter 1068:Template:Cite_ web#URL 922:Keep present behaviour 6315:A similar issue with 5476:|language=французский 4094:. On Knowledge these 3610:Unknown parameter ... 2811:not version-of-record 2582:|chapter=<set: --> 2521:|journal=<set: --> 2323:already ignored when 2158:You can also use the 2087:Help:Citation Style 1 1716:to journal metadata; 1678:(uppercase version); 1658:withdraw support for 1599:withdraw support for 943:the OP's past efforts 748:Keep current behavior 261:WP:Citation hijacking 42:of past discussions. 6008:"Title" (Interview). 5981:"Title" (Interview). 4195:Entertainment Weekly 4068:Entertainment Weekly 4014:. November 17, 2016. 3663:templates. We have 3570:is set, and because 3252:– no error message; 3189:Updated the table. 1668:as basic parameter; 955:originated this idea 6415:Module:Citation/CS1 6231:Module:Citation/CS1 5752:Urgent: Dash errors 5455:Yikes! that is old. 5305:) can be botted to 5185:. Pleas correct. — 4798:on 27 December 2008 4645:on 27 December 2008 3554:is a member of the 2986: 2804: 2710:&rft.genre=book 2590:|class=<set: --> 2586:|arxiv=<set: --> 2553:|class=<set: --> 2529:|class=<set: --> 2525:|arxiv=<set: --> 2497:|arxiv=<set: --> 2121:. Fall–Winter 1988. 1552:Module:Citation/CS1 452:and the section at 364:John Smith (2003). 297:John Smith (2003). 267:failed verification 171:and essays such as 128:request for comment 119:in absence of a URL 6165:very first version 6021:Unknown parameter 5994:Unknown parameter 5342:is also available. 4861:is clear on this ( 4583:InternetArchiveBot 4310:The New York Times 4305:The New York Times 3858:or some other non- 3817:or some other non- 3538:has generic name ( 3481:Unknown parameter 3435:Unknown parameter 3389:Unknown parameter 3343:Unknown parameter 3297:Unknown parameter 2990:Version of Record 2985:cs1|2 identifiers 2984: 2803:cs1|2 identifiers 2802: 2440:Unknown parameter 2022:Unknown parameter 1162:Template:Cite book 6619:Trappist the monk 6532:Trappist the monk 6497:Trappist the monk 6462:Trappist the monk 6181:Trappist the monk 6136:Trappist the monk 6058:Trappist the monk 5855:Trappist the monk 5815:Trappist the monk 5795:CS1 maint: year ( 5738:Trappist the monk 5660:Template:Ford1922 5653:Template:Ford1922 5619:Trappist the monk 5452: 5205:Trappist the monk 5155:Trappist the monk 5082:Trappist the monk 4828:Trappist the monk 4762:Trappist the monk 4723:Trappist the monk 4708:Trappist the monk 4334:earlier this year 4046:Trappist the monk 4031: 3979:Recently, making 3925:Trappist the monk 3909:Trappist the monk 3769:, likely because 3725:Trappist the monk 3704:Trappist the monk 3672:Trappist the monk 3512:Author. "Title". 3222:Trappist the monk 3185:Trappist the monk 3166: 3165: 2960:Trappist the monk 2921: 2920: 2808:version-of-record 2728:Trappist the monk 2610:Trappist the monk 2332:Trappist the monk 2208:Trappist the monk 2129:Trappist the monk 2046:Trappist the monk 1937:Trappist the monk 1843:Trappist the monk 1725:Trappist the monk 1637:update OSTI URL; 1506: 1197:Trappist the monk 998:verified-on-date. 855:source or not. -- 542:WP:FALSECONSENSUS 176:previous editors. 152: 151: 148:non-admin closure 100: 99: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 6636: 6613: 6612: 6611:{{Inflation/fn}} 6580: 6519: 6514: 6484: 6479: 6455: 6426: 6421: 6412: 6406: 6400: 6398: 6385:Broken templates 6324: 6318: 6236: 6175: 6167: 6130: 6030: 6024: 6019: 6017: 6009: 6003: 5997: 5992: 5990: 5982: 5970: 5949: 5893: 5841: 5818: 5800: 5793: 5787: 5782: 5780: 5772: 5680: 5603: 5582: 5574: 5566: 5562: 5558: 5554: 5550: 5546: 5541: 5537: 5528: 5524: 5520: 5511: 5507: 5503: 5499: 5494: 5490: 5481: 5477: 5473: 5472:|language=French 5469: 5446: 5431: 5427: 5341: 5333: 5325: 5319: 5312: 5308: 5304: 5300: 5296: 5243: 5237: 5187:Mikhail Ryazanov 5134: 5115: 5100: 5073: 5065: 5058: 5050: 5044: 5024: 5020: 5016: 5005: 4997: 4990: 4983: 4975: 4968: 4964: 4956: 4934: 4927: 4897: 4890: 4883: 4860: 4854: 4850: 4821: 4815: 4807: 4805: 4803: 4794:. Archived from 4779: 4772: 4765: 4750: 4741: 4726: 4699: 4697: 4695: 4684: 4678: 4668: 4662: 4654: 4652: 4650: 4641:. Archived from 4634: 4613: 4606: 4570: 4561: 4542: 4510: 4403: 4382: 4359: 4301: 4242: 4214: 4211: 4204: 4192: 4184: 4163: 4157: 4126: 4125:...</ref: --> 4117: 4111: 4107: 4101: 4025: 4015: 4003: 3989: 3900: 3894: 3888: 3880: 3876: 3869: 3865: 3857: 3828: 3824: 3816: 3800: 3792: 3787: 3778: 3772: 3768: 3762: 3758: 3752: 3748: 3742: 3738: 3734: 3694: 3666: 3662: 3654: 3646: 3645: 3640: 3636: 3632: 3631: 3626: 3622: 3611: 3607: 3603: 3599: 3598: 3593: 3592: 3587: 3583: 3579: 3576:does not render 3575: 3574: 3569: 3565: 3561: 3557: 3553: 3543: 3537: 3533: 3531: 3523: 3521: 3507: 3503: 3502: 3497: 3490: 3484: 3479: 3477: 3469: 3467: 3451: 3444: 3438: 3433: 3431: 3423: 3422: 3405: 3398: 3392: 3387: 3385: 3377: 3376: 3359: 3352: 3346: 3341: 3339: 3331: 3330: 3313: 3306: 3300: 3295: 3293: 3285: 3284: 3267: 3259: 3251: 3211: 3188: 3158: 3157: 3148: 3142: 3135: 3129: 3126: 3120: 3109: 2987: 2948: 2947: 2805: 2780: 2715: 2711: 2707: 2691: 2667: 2659: 2655: 2649: 2645: 2641: 2637: 2629: 2601: 2599: 2591: 2587: 2583: 2579: 2578: 2564: 2562: 2554: 2550: 2549: 2540: 2538: 2530: 2526: 2522: 2518: 2517: 2508: 2506: 2498: 2494: 2490: 2489: 2475: 2474: 2461: 2449: 2443: 2438: 2436: 2428: 2427: 2410: 2405:in italic font: 2404: 2400: 2399: 2394: 2390: 2389: 2384: 2371: 2347: 2326: 2322: 2318: 2314: 2310: 2306: 2299:be supported in 2298: 2288: 2265: 2259: 2255: 2249: 2202: 2165: 2161: 2122: 2114: 2038: 2031: 2025: 2020: 2018: 2010: 1982: 1977:Empty citation ( 1975: 1973: 1965: 1930: 1925:Empty citation ( 1923: 1921: 1913: 1910: 1900: 1899:citation-comment 1896: 1890: 1876:Citation-comment 1815: 1812: 1809: 1806: 1803: 1800: 1797: 1794: 1791: 1787: 1784: 1781: 1778: 1775: 1772: 1769: 1766: 1763: 1760: 1757: 1754: 1751: 1715: 1695: 1677: 1667: 1661: 1630: 1622:remove hack for 1606: 1602: 1577: 1576:hyphen_to_dash() 1505: 1491: 1484: 1477: 1465: 1439: 1415: 1396: 1365: 1358: 1345: 1296: 1184: 989: 967: 961: 909: 894: 891: 884: 851:or no URL, it's 850: 846: 834: 822: 787: 718: 695: 678: 649: 588: 559: 524: 508: 496:should change. 442: 418: 393: 387: 383: 379: 377: 369: 356: 335: 312: 310: 308: 290: 274: 270: 258: 254: 246: 228: 211: 145: 144: 135: 118: 110: 78: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 6644: 6643: 6639: 6638: 6637: 6635: 6634: 6633: 6610: 6609: 6598:prospective fix 6574: 6571:this discussion 6517: 6512: 6482: 6477: 6449: 6424: 6419: 6410: 6404: 6402: 6396: 6394: 6387: 6322: 6316: 6234: 6220:FYI, I changed 6218: 6169: 6163: 6106:Candide#Sources 6093: 6020: 6010: 6007: 5993: 5983: 5980: 5965: 5928: 5872: 5820: 5812: 5794: 5783: 5773: 5766: 5754: 5715: 5656: 5602: 5590:Help:CS1 errors 5544: 5337: 5331: 5293:Templates with 5241: 5235: 5232: 5175: 5133: 5113: 5099: 5068: 5063: 5053: 5048: 5042: 5022: 5018: 5014: 5000: 4995: 4988: 4978: 4973: 4966: 4962: 4959: 4954: 4930: 4923: 4893: 4886: 4882:</title: --> 4858: 4852: 4808: 4801: 4799: 4790: 4775: 4768: 4759: 4737: 4720: 4693: 4691: 4689:"Archived copy" 4687: 4682: 4655: 4648: 4646: 4639:"Archived copy" 4637: 4632: 4609: 4602: 4557: 4540: 4533: 4504: 4492:J. Johnson (JJ) 4397: 4376: 4357: 4307:—do I wikilink 4295: 4267:J. Johnson (JJ) 4236: 4224:J. Johnson (JJ) 4210: 4207: 4202: 4199: 4186: 4178: 4166:J. Johnson (JJ) 4161: 4155: 4115: 4109: 4105: 4099: 4062: 4001: 3997: 3987: 3953: 3898: 3892: 3882: 3859: 3851: 3818: 3810: 3794: 3781: 3776: 3770: 3766: 3760: 3756: 3754:cite conference 3750: 3746: 3740: 3656: 3648: 3643: 3642: 3629: 3628: 3609: 3606:basic_arguments 3605: 3596: 3595: 3590: 3589: 3572: 3571: 3556:basic_arguments 3555: 3534: 3524: 3511: 3500: 3499: 3495: 3480: 3470: 3454: 3449: 3434: 3424: 3408: 3403: 3388: 3378: 3362: 3357: 3342: 3332: 3316: 3311: 3296: 3286: 3271: 3261: 3253: 3249: 3190: 3182: 3167: 3162: 3161: 3151: 3149: 3145: 3136: 3132: 3127: 3123: 3110: 3106: 2941: 2939: 2922: 2759: 2713: 2709: 2701: 2670: 2661: 2653: 2647: 2631: 2623: 2597: 2595: 2576: 2575: 2560: 2558: 2547: 2546: 2536: 2534: 2515: 2514: 2504: 2502: 2487: 2486: 2464: 2459: 2439: 2429: 2413: 2408: 2397: 2396: 2387: 2386: 2378: 2350: 2327:is not present? 2300: 2267: 2263: 2257: 2253: 2247: 2244: 2116: 2112: 2068: 2032: 2021: 2011: 2005: 1976: 1966: 1964: 1924: 1914: 1912: 1908: 1898: 1892: 1886: 1878: 1817: 1816: 1813: 1810: 1807: 1804: 1801: 1798: 1795: 1792: 1788: 1785: 1782: 1779: 1776: 1773: 1770: 1767: 1764: 1761: 1758: 1755: 1752: 1749: 1740: 1709: 1610:updated locks; 1575: 1545: 1540: 1539: 1487: 1480: 1418: 1378:does not render 1361: 1354: 1275: 1227:Alanscottwalker 1182: 965: 959: 907: 890: 887: 882: 879: 828: 697: 628: 502: 494:Help:CS1 errors 454:Help:CS1_errors 380: 370: 363: 314: 306: 304: 296: 264: 248: 237: 204: 131: 121: 116: 112: 111: 106: 74: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 6642: 6640: 6632: 6631: 6630: 6629: 6615: 6603: 6602: 6601: 6588: 6587: 6586: 6548: 6547: 6546: 6545: 6544: 6543: 6542: 6528: 6493: 6447: 6446: 6401: 6393: 6386: 6383: 6382: 6381: 6380: 6379: 6378: 6377: 6376: 6375: 6374: 6373: 6372: 6371: 6237:(specified in 6217: 6214: 6213: 6212: 6211: 6210: 6209: 6208: 6207: 6206: 6177: 6132: 6092: 6086: 6085: 6084: 6083: 6082: 6054: 6049:That would be 6032: 6031: 6023:|interviewers= 6014:cite interview 6004: 5996:|interviewers= 5987:cite interview 5969:|interviewers= 5964: 5961: 5960: 5959: 5958: 5957: 5956: 5955: 5954: 5953: 5918: 5917: 5916: 5915: 5914: 5913: 5866: 5865: 5851: 5810: 5809: 5802: 5801: 5760: 5759: 5753: 5750: 5749: 5748: 5734: 5714: 5711: 5710: 5709: 5708: 5707: 5655: 5649: 5648: 5647: 5646: 5645: 5631: 5615: 5612: 5610: 5607: 5605: 5586: 5584: 5578: 5532: 5530: 5515: 5513: 5485: 5483: 5464: 5462: 5458: 5456: 5453: 5444: 5422: 5421: 5420: 5392: 5391: 5390: 5389: 5388: 5345: 5344: 5343: 5335: 5329: 5321: 5314: 5264: 5263: 5260: 5257: 5254: 5231: 5228: 5227: 5226: 5225: 5224: 5201: 5174: 5171: 5170: 5169: 5168: 5167: 5166: 5165: 5151: 5136: 5127: 5126: 5125: 5124: 5123: 5122: 5116: 5106: 5105: 5104: 5103: 5093: 5092: 5078: 5077: 5076: 5075: 5074: 5061: 5060: 5059: 5026: 5007: 5006: 4998: 4985: 4984: 4976: 4958: 4953:Separators in 4951: 4950: 4949: 4948: 4947: 4946: 4945: 4944: 4943: 4942: 4941: 4940: 4939: 4881:<title: --> 4867:108.182.15.109 4848:<title: --> 4839: 4838: 4824: 4823: 4822: 4792:"Archive copy" 4757: 4756: 4755: 4754: 4704: 4703: 4702: 4701: 4700: 4673: 4672: 4671: 4670: 4669: 4598: 4597: 4532: 4531:Archived title 4529: 4528: 4527: 4526: 4525: 4524: 4523: 4522: 4521: 4520: 4519: 4518: 4517: 4516:is a college.) 4479: 4478: 4477: 4476: 4475: 4474: 4473: 4472: 4471: 4470: 4442: 4441: 4440: 4439: 4438: 4437: 4436: 4435: 4348: 4330: 4329: 4328: 4327: 4326: 4288: 4287: 4286: 4285: 4284: 4283: 4282: 4281: 4280: 4279: 4278: 4277: 4208: 4150: 4149: 4138:repeat linking 4133: 4132: 4129:full citations 4096:full citations 4061: 4058: 4057: 4056: 4042: 3952: 3949: 3948: 3947: 3946: 3945: 3944: 3943: 3905: 3904: 3903: 3689: 3688: 3687: 3686: 3685: 3684: 3683: 3682: 3668: 3659:cite citeseerx 3615: 3614: 3613: 3597:{{cite arxiv}} 3548: 3547: 3546: 3545: 3544: 3508:used properly 3501:{{cite arxiv}} 3493: 3492: 3491: 3447: 3446: 3445: 3401: 3400: 3399: 3355: 3354: 3353: 3309: 3308: 3307: 3242:I have hacked 3240: 3239: 3238: 3237: 3236: 3235: 3234: 3233: 3232: 3218: 3164: 3163: 3160: 3159: 3154:cite newsgroup 3143: 3130: 3121: 3103: 3102: 3099: 3098: 3053: 3036: 2998: 2997: 2994: 2991: 2982: 2981: 2980: 2979: 2978: 2977: 2976: 2975: 2974: 2973: 2972: 2971: 2970: 2956: 2953: 2952: 2951: 2950: 2949: 2944:cite newsgroup 2919: 2918: 2885: 2852: 2816: 2815: 2812: 2809: 2800: 2799: 2798: 2797: 2796: 2795: 2794: 2793: 2792: 2791: 2790: 2789: 2788: 2747: 2746: 2745: 2744: 2743: 2742: 2741: 2740: 2739: 2738: 2724: 2719: 2718: 2717: 2606: 2605: 2604: 2603: 2602: 2569: 2568: 2567: 2566: 2565: 2548:{{cite arxiv}} 2543: 2542: 2541: 2511: 2510: 2509: 2480: 2479: 2478: 2477: 2476: 2454: 2453: 2452: 2451: 2450: 2391:how to render 2328: 2243: 2240: 2239: 2238: 2220: 2219: 2218: 2204: 2187:David Eppstein 2182: 2181: 2180: 2179: 2178: 2141: 2140: 2139: 2125: 2124: 2123: 2073:David Eppstein 2067: 2064: 2063: 2062: 2061: 2060: 2059: 2058: 2057: 2056: 2042: 2041: 2040: 1962: 1933: 1932: 1931: 1877: 1874: 1873: 1872: 1871: 1870: 1869: 1868: 1839: 1818: 1748: 1745: 1739: 1736: 1721: 1720: 1698: 1697: 1683: 1682: 1672: 1662: 1648: 1647: 1641: 1635: 1626: 1620: 1617: 1614: 1608: 1589: 1588: 1582: 1572: 1566: 1544: 1541: 1533: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1529: 1496: 1469: 1468: 1467: 1443: 1417:go with them. 1402: 1401: 1400: 1379: 1374: 1373: 1372: 1371: 1370: 1323: 1322: 1321: 1255: 1237: 1216: 1206:Flyer22 Reborn 1137: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1117:Uanfala (talk) 1098: 1097: 1082: 1072:Uanfala (talk) 1034:Uanfala (talk) 1004: 1003: 1002: 1001: 1000: 999: 995: 991: 953:seems to have 936: 919: 898: 888: 873: 872: 871: 870: 869: 868: 867: 837:David Eppstein 795:David Eppstein 770: 744: 743: 742: 741: 740: 739: 738: 737: 727:David Eppstein 685: 684: 683: 682: 654: 653: 620: 619: 618: 617: 616: 573:David Eppstein 565: 564: 563: 530: 529: 528: 476: 475: 474: 473: 472: 471: 470: 469: 468: 397: 313:works for me. 236: 233: 208:Should use of 205: 183: 177: 166: 143: 142: 141: 122: 120: 113: 104: 102: 101: 98: 97: 92: 89: 84: 79: 72: 67: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 6641: 6628: 6624: 6620: 6616: 6606: 6605: 6604: 6599: 6595: 6591: 6590: 6589: 6584: 6578: 6572: 6568: 6564: 6563: 6562: 6558: 6554: 6549: 6541: 6537: 6533: 6529: 6525: 6524: 6523: 6520: 6515: 6508: 6507: 6506: 6502: 6498: 6494: 6490: 6489: 6488: 6485: 6480: 6474: 6473: 6472: 6471: 6467: 6463: 6459: 6453: 6445: 6441: 6437: 6433: 6432: 6431: 6430: 6427: 6422: 6416: 6409: 6399: 6392: 6384: 6370: 6366: 6362: 6358: 6354: 6353: 6352: 6348: 6344: 6339: 6338: 6337: 6336: 6332: 6328: 6321: 6313: 6312: 6311: 6307: 6303: 6299: 6295: 6294: 6293: 6289: 6285: 6281: 6277: 6276: 6275: 6271: 6267: 6263: 6259: 6258: 6257: 6256: 6252: 6248: 6244: 6240: 6232: 6228: 6223: 6215: 6205: 6201: 6197: 6192: 6191: 6190: 6186: 6182: 6178: 6173: 6166: 6161: 6160: 6159: 6155: 6151: 6150:2.247.243.131 6147: 6146: 6145: 6141: 6137: 6133: 6126: 6125: 6124: 6123: 6119: 6115: 6114:2.247.243.131 6109: 6107: 6101: 6099: 6090: 6087: 6081: 6077: 6073: 6069: 6068: 6067: 6063: 6059: 6055: 6052: 6048: 6047: 6046: 6045: 6041: 6037: 6028: 6015: 6005: 6001: 5988: 5978: 5977: 5976: 5974: 5952: 5947: 5943: 5939: 5935: 5931: 5926: 5925: 5924: 5923: 5922: 5921: 5920: 5919: 5912: 5908: 5904: 5901: 5898: 5897: 5896: 5891: 5887: 5883: 5879: 5875: 5870: 5869: 5868: 5867: 5864: 5860: 5856: 5852: 5850: 5847: 5846: 5845: 5844: 5839: 5835: 5831: 5827: 5823: 5816: 5807: 5806: 5805: 5798: 5791: 5778: 5770: 5765: 5764: 5763: 5756: 5755: 5751: 5747: 5743: 5739: 5735: 5732: 5731: 5730: 5729: 5725: 5721: 5712: 5706: 5702: 5698: 5694: 5693: 5692: 5688: 5684: 5676: 5675: 5674: 5673: 5669: 5665: 5661: 5654: 5650: 5644: 5640: 5636: 5635:colt_browning 5632: 5630: 5629: 5628: 5624: 5620: 5616: 5613: 5611: 5608: 5606: 5600: 5595: 5591: 5587: 5585: 5576: 5572: 5533: 5531: 5519:|access-date= 5516: 5514: 5486: 5484: 5465: 5463: 5459: 5457: 5454: 5450: 5449:edit conflict 5445: 5443: 5439: 5435: 5423: 5419: 5415: 5411: 5410:colt_browning 5407: 5406: 5405: 5401: 5397: 5393: 5387: 5383: 5379: 5375: 5374: 5373: 5369: 5365: 5364:colt_browning 5360: 5359: 5358: 5354: 5350: 5346: 5334:or first/last 5322: 5315: 5301:(if not also 5292: 5291: 5288: 5287: 5286: 5285: 5281: 5277: 5276:colt_browning 5272: 5268: 5261: 5258: 5255: 5252: 5251: 5250: 5248: 5245:regressions. 5240: 5229: 5223: 5220: 5216: 5215: 5214: 5210: 5206: 5202: 5199: 5198: 5197: 5196: 5192: 5188: 5184: 5180: 5172: 5164: 5160: 5156: 5152: 5149: 5148: 5147: 5143: 5139: 5132:I think that 5131: 5130: 5129: 5128: 5120: 5117: 5112: 5111: 5110: 5109: 5108: 5107: 5097: 5096: 5095: 5094: 5091: 5087: 5083: 5079: 5071: 5067: 5066: 5062: 5056: 5052: 5051: 5047: 5046: 5040: 5039: 5038: 5037: 5033: 5029: 5012: 5003: 4999: 4994: 4993: 4992: 4981: 4977: 4972: 4971: 4970: 4952: 4938: 4935: 4933: 4928: 4926: 4920: 4919: 4918: 4914: 4910: 4903: 4902: 4901: 4898: 4896: 4891: 4889: 4878: 4877: 4876: 4872: 4868: 4864: 4857: 4845: 4844: 4843: 4842: 4841: 4840: 4837: 4833: 4829: 4825: 4819: 4813: 4797: 4793: 4789: 4788: 4786: 4785: 4784: 4783: 4780: 4778: 4773: 4771: 4763: 4753: 4748: 4747: 4742: 4740: 4734: 4733: 4724: 4719: 4718: 4717: 4713: 4709: 4705: 4690: 4686: 4685: 4681: 4680: 4677:|archive-url= 4674: 4666: 4660: 4644: 4640: 4636: 4635: 4631: 4630: 4628: 4624: 4620: 4619: 4618: 4617: 4614: 4612: 4607: 4605: 4596: 4592: 4588: 4584: 4580: 4576: 4575: 4574: 4573: 4568: 4567: 4562: 4560: 4554: 4553: 4546: 4541:Archived copy 4538: 4530: 4515: 4508: 4503: 4502: 4501: 4497: 4493: 4489: 4488: 4487: 4486: 4485: 4484: 4483: 4482: 4481: 4480: 4468: 4464: 4460: 4456: 4452: 4451: 4450: 4449: 4448: 4447: 4446: 4445: 4444: 4443: 4434: 4430: 4426: 4422: 4418: 4417: 4416: 4412: 4408: 4405:primarily. -- 4401: 4396: 4395: 4394: 4390: 4386: 4380: 4375: 4374: 4373: 4369: 4365: 4360: 4353: 4349: 4347: 4343: 4339: 4335: 4331: 4325: 4321: 4317: 4312: 4311: 4306: 4299: 4294: 4293: 4292: 4291: 4290: 4289: 4276: 4272: 4268: 4264: 4260: 4256: 4255: 4254: 4250: 4246: 4240: 4235: 4234: 4233: 4229: 4225: 4221: 4220: 4219: 4218: 4217: 4213: 4212: 4205: 4196: 4190: 4182: 4177: 4176: 4175: 4171: 4167: 4160: 4152: 4151: 4147: 4143: 4139: 4135: 4134: 4130: 4121: 4114: 4104: 4097: 4093: 4089: 4085: 4084: 4083: 4082: 4078: 4074: 4070: 4069: 4059: 4055: 4051: 4047: 4043: 4040: 4037: 4036: 4035: 4034: 4029: 4024: 4021: 4016: 4013: 4009: 4008: 4000: 3994: 3990: 3984: 3982: 3976: 3974: 3970: 3966: 3960: 3958: 3957:documentation 3950: 3942: 3938: 3934: 3930: 3926: 3922: 3921: 3920: 3919: 3918: 3914: 3910: 3906: 3901: 3897: 3886: 3871: 3863: 3855: 3847: 3846: 3845: 3841: 3837: 3833: 3822: 3814: 3808: 3804: 3798: 3785: 3775: 3765: 3755: 3745: 3730: 3726: 3722: 3721: 3716: 3715: 3714: 3713: 3709: 3705: 3700: 3698: 3681: 3677: 3673: 3669: 3660: 3652: 3618: 3617: 3616: 3549: 3541: 3529: 3520: 3515: 3510: 3509: 3494: 3488: 3475: 3466: 3461: 3457: 3453: 3452: 3448: 3442: 3429: 3421: 3416: 3412: 3407: 3406: 3402: 3396: 3383: 3375: 3370: 3366: 3361: 3360: 3356: 3350: 3337: 3329: 3324: 3320: 3315: 3314: 3310: 3304: 3291: 3283: 3278: 3274: 3270: 3269: 3265: 3257: 3248: 3247: 3245: 3241: 3231: 3227: 3223: 3219: 3216: 3215: 3214: 3209: 3205: 3201: 3197: 3193: 3186: 3181: 3180: 3179: 3178: 3177: 3176: 3175: 3174: 3173: 3172: 3171: 3170: 3169: 3168: 3155: 3147: 3144: 3140: 3134: 3131: 3125: 3122: 3118: 3114: 3108: 3105: 3100: 3097: 3093: 3089: 3085: 3081: 3077: 3073: 3069: 3065: 3061: 3057: 3054: 3052: 3048: 3044: 3040: 3037: 3035: 3031: 3027: 3023: 3019: 3015: 3011: 3007: 3003: 3000: 2999: 2995: 2992: 2989: 2988: 2969: 2965: 2961: 2957: 2954: 2945: 2938: 2937: 2936: 2935: 2934: 2933: 2932: 2931: 2930: 2929: 2928: 2927: 2926: 2925: 2924: 2923: 2917: 2913: 2909: 2905: 2901: 2897: 2893: 2889: 2886: 2884: 2880: 2876: 2872: 2868: 2864: 2860: 2856: 2853: 2851: 2850: 2845: 2841: 2837: 2833: 2829: 2825: 2821: 2818: 2817: 2813: 2810: 2807: 2806: 2785: 2784: 2783: 2778: 2774: 2770: 2766: 2762: 2757: 2756: 2755: 2754: 2753: 2752: 2751: 2750: 2749: 2748: 2737: 2733: 2729: 2725: 2722: 2721: 2720: 2705: 2699: 2696: 2695: 2694: 2689: 2685: 2681: 2677: 2673: 2665: 2660:in any other 2652: 2635: 2627: 2621: 2620: 2619: 2615: 2611: 2607: 2594: 2593: 2573: 2572: 2570: 2557: 2556: 2544: 2533: 2532: 2512: 2501: 2500: 2484: 2483: 2481: 2473: 2468: 2463: 2462: 2458: 2457: 2455: 2447: 2434: 2426: 2421: 2417: 2412: 2411: 2407: 2406: 2382: 2376: 2375: 2374: 2369: 2365: 2361: 2357: 2353: 2343: 2342: 2341: 2337: 2333: 2329: 2304: 2294: 2293: 2292: 2291: 2286: 2282: 2278: 2274: 2270: 2262: 2252: 2241: 2237: 2233: 2229: 2225: 2221: 2217: 2213: 2209: 2205: 2198: 2197: 2196: 2192: 2188: 2183: 2177: 2173: 2169: 2157: 2156: 2155: 2151: 2147: 2142: 2138: 2134: 2130: 2126: 2120: 2111: 2110: 2108: 2104: 2103: 2102: 2101: 2100: 2096: 2092: 2088: 2085: 2084: 2083: 2082: 2078: 2074: 2065: 2055: 2051: 2047: 2043: 2036: 2029: 2016: 2008: 2004: 2003: 2000: 1999: 1998: 1994: 1990: 1985: 1984: 1980: 1971: 1963: 1961: 1957: 1953: 1948: 1947: 1946: 1942: 1938: 1934: 1928: 1919: 1907: 1906: 1904: 1895: 1889: 1884: 1880: 1879: 1875: 1867: 1863: 1859: 1854: 1853: 1852: 1848: 1844: 1840: 1837: 1833: 1832: 1831: 1827: 1823: 1819: 1746: 1742: 1741: 1737: 1735: 1734: 1730: 1726: 1719: 1713: 1712:cite magazine 1707: 1706: 1705: 1703: 1692: 1691: 1690: 1688: 1681: 1673: 1671: 1663: 1657: 1656: 1655: 1653: 1646: 1642: 1640: 1636: 1634: 1627: 1625: 1621: 1618: 1615: 1613: 1609: 1598: 1597: 1596: 1594: 1587: 1583: 1581: 1573: 1571: 1567: 1565: 1561: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1553: 1548: 1542: 1537: 1528: 1524: 1520: 1515: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1504: 1500: 1497: 1495: 1492: 1490: 1485: 1483: 1476:|access-date= 1473: 1470: 1461: 1460: 1459: 1455: 1451: 1447: 1444: 1442: 1437: 1433: 1429: 1425: 1421: 1410: 1406: 1403: 1399: 1394: 1391: 1388: 1387: 1377: 1375: 1369: 1366: 1364: 1359: 1357: 1350: 1349: 1348: 1343: 1340: 1337: 1336: 1329: 1324: 1320: 1316: 1312: 1308: 1303: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1294: 1290: 1286: 1282: 1278: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1267: 1263: 1259: 1256: 1254: 1250: 1246: 1241: 1238: 1236: 1232: 1228: 1224: 1220: 1217: 1215: 1211: 1207: 1203: 1198: 1194: 1190: 1188: 1177: 1173: 1169: 1167: 1163: 1158: 1154: 1150: 1146: 1142: 1139: 1138: 1121: 1118: 1113: 1108: 1104: 1103: 1102: 1101: 1100: 1099: 1096: 1092: 1088: 1083: 1078: 1077: 1076: 1073: 1069: 1064: 1060: 1059: 1058: 1054: 1050: 1045: 1040: 1039: 1038: 1035: 1031: 1027: 1023: 1022: 1021: 1017: 1013: 1008: 1007: 1006: 1005: 996: 992: 985: 984: 982: 981: 980: 976: 972: 964: 963:verify source 956: 952: 948: 944: 940: 937: 935: 931: 927: 926:Peter coxhead 923: 920: 918: 914: 910: 902: 899: 897: 893: 892: 885: 877: 874: 866: 862: 858: 854: 845:|access-date= 842: 838: 832: 827: 826: 825: 820: 817: 814: 813: 806: 805: 804: 800: 796: 792: 791: 790: 785: 782: 779: 778: 771: 769: 765: 761: 757: 753: 749: 746: 745: 736: 732: 728: 723: 722: 721: 716: 712: 708: 704: 700: 694:|access-date= 691: 690: 689: 688: 687: 686: 681: 676: 673: 670: 669: 662: 658: 657: 656: 655: 652: 647: 643: 639: 635: 631: 625: 621: 615: 611: 607: 603: 602: 601: 597: 593: 587:|access-date= 584: 583: 582: 578: 574: 569: 566: 562: 557: 554: 551: 550: 543: 539: 534: 531: 527: 522: 519: 516: 515: 506: 499: 495: 491: 490: 489: 485: 481: 477: 467: 463: 459: 455: 451: 447: 446: 445: 440: 437: 434: 433: 426: 423: 422: 421: 416: 413: 410: 409: 402: 395: 391: 382:|access-date= 375: 367: 361: 360: 359: 354: 351: 348: 347: 340: 339: 338: 333: 329: 325: 321: 317: 302: 301: 295: 294: 293: 288: 285: 282: 281: 268: 262: 257:|access-date= 252: 245:|access-date= 242: 239: 238: 234: 232: 231: 226: 223: 220: 219: 213: 210:|access-date= 203: 199: 195: 191: 187: 180: 174: 170: 164: 160: 156: 149: 140: 137: 134: 129: 124: 123: 114: 96: 93: 90: 88: 85: 83: 80: 77: 73: 71: 68: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 6583:phab:T205803 6577:Inflation/fn 6569:and started 6452:Inflation/fn 6448: 6408:Inflation/fn 6403: 6397:Task T205803 6314: 6219: 6172:cite journal 6110: 6102: 6097: 6094: 6051:this comment 6033: 5966: 5811: 5804:Rather than 5803: 5777:cite journal 5771:: 1654–1055. 5768: 5761: 5757:<pre: --> 5716: 5679:|postscript= 5657: 5594:Category:CS1 5570: 5480:|language=fr 5273: 5269: 5265: 5239:cite journal 5233: 5176: 5118: 5069: 5054: 5043:cfg.messages 5008: 5001: 4986: 4979: 4960: 4931: 4924: 4909:72.43.99.138 4894: 4887: 4800:. Retrieved 4796:the original 4776: 4769: 4758: 4745: 4738: 4731: 4692:. Retrieved 4679:is not set: 4647:. Retrieved 4643:the original 4610: 4603: 4599: 4565: 4558: 4551: 4534: 4514:Cooper Union 4462: 4458: 4454: 4356: 4351: 4308: 4304: 4262: 4200: 4194: 4145: 4141: 4128: 4124:<ref: --> 4119: 4095: 4091: 4087: 4066: 4063: 4028:Boracay Bill 4027: 4018: 4005: 3996: 3992: 3986: 3978: 3972: 3968: 3964: 3962: 3954: 3896:cite journal 3885:cite journal 3854:cite journal 3813:cite journal 3784:cite journal 3764:cite journal 3744:cite journal 3720:The Signpost 3718: 3701: 3699:is deleted. 3690: 3651:cite biorxiv 3644:{{citation}} 3630:{{citation}} 3600:. Deleting 3591:{{citation}} 3573:{{citation}} 3410: 3365:Encyclopedia 3364: 3318: 3272: 3146: 3138: 3133: 3124: 3117:ResearchGate 3107: 2847: 2787:identifiers: 2577:{{citation}} 2516:{{citation}} 2488:{{citation}} 2415: 2398:{{citation}} 2388:{{citation}} 2307:when it has 2303:cite journal 2245: 2118: 2069: 2006: 1722: 1699: 1684: 1649: 1590: 1558:implemented 1549: 1546: 1535: 1519:WhatamIdoing 1498: 1488: 1481: 1471: 1464:|accessdate= 1445: 1404: 1385: 1362: 1355: 1334: 1306: 1257: 1239: 1218: 1200: 1179: 1171: 1165: 1160: 1148: 1140: 1111: 1106: 1087:WhatamIdoing 1062: 1049:WhatamIdoing 1029: 1025: 1012:WhatamIdoing 971:WhatamIdoing 938: 921: 900: 880: 875: 852: 811: 776: 747: 667: 567: 548: 538:WP:STONEWALL 513: 431: 407: 365: 345: 305:. Retrieved 299: 279: 240: 217: 207: 206: 188:are here to 157:. Plus, the 154: 138: 132: 125: 75: 43: 37: 6391:Phabricator 6389:Tracked in 6280:WP:THURSDAY 5762:Renders as 5565:|coauthors= 5553:|coauthors= 5545:&rft.au 5540:|coauthors= 5426:|coauthors= 5324:|coauthors= 4457:of a given 4203:Imzadi 1979 3993:Producing: 3625:|citeseerx= 3584:alias or a 3409:"Chapter", 2712:instead of 2636:|mode=cs2}} 2545:elseif not 2105:Where does 1744:Common.css. 1700:changes to 1685:changes to 1650:changes to 1624:phab:T29786 1591:changes to 1550:changes to 1386:SMcCandlish 1335:SMcCandlish 1187:WP:Link rot 1176:Checkingfax 1166:access-date 1157:Sangdeboeuf 1151:As seen in 1145:SMcCandlish 1044:WP:Link rot 883:Imzadi 1979 831:SMcCandlish 812:SMcCandlish 777:SMcCandlish 668:SMcCandlish 549:SMcCandlish 536:This is a 514:SMcCandlish 432:SMcCandlish 408:SMcCandlish 346:SMcCandlish 307:20 February 280:SMcCandlish 218:SMcCandlish 117:access-date 36:This is an 6527:MediaWiki. 6070:Indeed. -- 5720:Peacedance 5677:Misuse of 5561:|coauthor= 5549:|coauthor= 5536:|coauthor= 5468:|language= 5150:ok. done. 5023:|language= 4963:|language= 4955:|language= 4802:2 November 4694:2 November 4649:2 November 4507:J. Johnson 4400:Drown Soda 4385:Drown Soda 4316:Drown Soda 4298:Imzadi1979 4245:Drown Soda 4239:J. Johnson 4189:Drown Soda 4181:J. Johnson 4146:note links 4073:Drown Soda 4020:Wtmitchell 3929:Nøkkenbuer 3862:cite arXiv 3832:Nøkkenbuer 3821:cite arXiv 3797:cite arXiv 3774:cite arXiv 3528:cite arXiv 3519:1705.01263 3465:1705.01263 3420:1705.01263 3374:1705.01263 3328:1705.01263 3282:1705.01263 3264:cite arxiv 3139:related to 3119:dois, etc. 2993:Preprints 2634:cite arxiv 2472:1807.01234 2425:1807.01234 2251:cite arxiv 2164:|date=1988 2109:say that? 1768:font-style 1718:discussion 1680:discussion 1676:|ASIN-TLD= 1674:deprecate 1670:discussion 1664:deprecate 1645:discussion 1639:discussion 1633:discussion 1612:discussion 1605:|language= 1586:discussion 1580:discussion 1570:discussion 1564:discussion 853:ephemereal 752:since 2009 95:Archive 55 87:Archive 50 82:Archive 49 76:Archive 48 70:Archive 47 65:Archive 46 60:Archive 45 6518:(discuss) 6483:(discuss) 6425:(discuss) 6098:bold text 6025:ignored ( 6006:Sandbox: 5998:ignored ( 5979:Current: 5907:pingó mió 5903:Galobtter 5697:Jonesey95 5664:Jonesey95 5581:|authors= 5557:|authors= 5474:, write: 5434:Jonesey95 5340:|authors= 5177:They are 4957:parameter 4787:tweaked: 4587:Jonesey95 4579:this edit 4577:Based on 4455:citations 4148:(e.g.: ). 4026:(earlier 3973:publisher 3963:When set, 3879:|journal= 3667:for that. 3665:|mode=cs2 3639:|chapter= 3621:|biorxiv= 3604:from the 3586:|chapter= 3485:ignored ( 3439:ignored ( 3393:ignored ( 3363:"Title", 3347:ignored ( 3317:"Title", 3301:ignored ( 3047:CITESEERX 2863:CITESEERX 2444:ignored ( 2168:Jonesey95 2117:"Title". 2026:ignored ( 2024:|authors= 2015:cite book 1970:cite book 1918:cite book 1894:this edit 1888:this edit 1450:Nigel Ish 1328:WP:HIJACK 947:change it 661:WP:HIJACK 592:Jonesey95 401:WP:HIJACK 384:requires 374:cite book 251:Cite book 194:The Gnome 179:Jonesey95 173:WP:HIJACK 6553:Mikeblas 6513:Hawkeye7 6478:Hawkeye7 6436:Mikeblas 6420:Hawkeye7 6343:Frietjes 6327:Muhandes 6302:Frietjes 6266:Frietjes 6247:Frietjes 6129:|volume= 6104:look at 5930:Headbomb 5874:Headbomb 5822:Headbomb 5769:Whatever 5309:(as in, 5219:Kanguole 5138:Αντιγόνη 5028:Αντιγόνη 4989:", and " 4856:cite web 4812:cite web 4739:Josve05a 4659:cite web 4559:Josve05a 4113:citation 4103:cite xxx 4039:This rfc 3969:location 3937:contribs 3840:contribs 3729:Headbomb 3568:|eprint= 3536:|author= 3474:cite web 3428:citation 3382:citation 3336:citation 3290:citation 3256:citation 3192:Headbomb 3030:USENETID 2849:USENETID 2761:Headbomb 2704:citation 2672:Headbomb 2664:cite xxx 2651:citation 2626:citation 2433:citation 2401:renders 2381:citation 2352:Headbomb 2269:Headbomb 2261:citation 1756:citation 1420:Headbomb 1311:Blueboar 1277:Headbomb 1262:Blueboar 1107:relevant 699:Headbomb 630:Headbomb 505:cite web 316:Headbomb 235:Comments 6243:T205803 6227:T205803 5569:|author 5502:|month= 5489:|month= 5461:others. 5430:|month= 5328:|author 5295:|month= 5179:hyphens 4967:" and " 3875:|class= 3868:|class= 3827:|class= 3791:|class= 3737:|arxiv= 3733:|class= 3693:|class= 3602:|class= 3578:|title= 3564:|arxiv= 3560:|class= 3552:|class= 3506:|class= 3483:|class= 3456:"Title" 3437:|class= 3391:|class= 3345:|class= 3319:Journal 3299:|class= 3113:bioRxiv 3060:BIBCODE 3043:BIORXIV 2892:BIBCODE 2859:BIORXIV 2658:|class= 2644:|class= 2640:|arxiv= 2600:ignored 2598:|class= 2596:error: 2574:elseif 2563:ignored 2561:|class= 2559:error: 2539:ignored 2537:|class= 2535:error: 2513:elseif 2507:ignored 2505:|arxiv= 2503:error: 2442:|class= 2403:|title= 2393:|title= 2346:|class= 2325:|arxiv= 2321:|class= 2317:|arxiv= 2313:|class= 2309:|arxiv= 2297:|class= 2160:|issue= 2119:Journal 2009:. 2018. 1774:inherit 1694:|class= 1629:|class= 1574:revise 1503:SarahSV 1446:Comment 1141:Comment 756:in 2013 368:. p. 8. 115:Permit 39:archive 6357:you're 6355:Since 6196:Jc3s5h 5786:|year= 5510:|date= 5506:|year= 5307:|date= 5299:|year= 5183:dashes 5181:, not 4425:Jc3s5h 4136:Your " 4092:source 4023:(talk) 3635:|work= 3627:where 3582:|work= 3115:dois, 2996:Other 2814:other 2091:Jc3s5h 1793:quotes 1666:|class 1245:Jc3s5h 1061:Well, 901:Oppose 403:tool. 303:. p. 8 169:WP:AGF 6596:(the 6235:ocins 5900:10000 5527:|url= 5523:|url= 5521:with 5508:into 5498:|day= 5493:|day= 5318:|doi= 5303:|day= 5119:Title 5070:Title 5055:Title 5002:Title 4980:Title 4961:When 4925:Green 4888:Green 4770:Green 4604:Green 4421:Xover 4407:Xover 4379:Xover 4364:Xover 4002:(PDF) 3959:says 3514:arXiv 3460:arXiv 3415:arXiv 3411:Title 3369:arXiv 3323:arXiv 3277:arXiv 3273:Title 3064:EISSN 3039:ARXIV 3014:JSTOR 2896:EISSN 2855:ARXIV 2836:JSTOR 2592:then 2555:then 2531:then 2499:then 2467:arXiv 2420:arXiv 2315:when 2256:, or 2107:H:CS1 2007:Title 1607:alias 1603:as a 1482:Green 1356:Green 1191:" In 988:|url= 857:Xover 849:|url= 841:Masem 458:Nthep 424:Done 396:fatal 386:|url= 366:Title 300:Title 273:|via= 16:< 6623:talk 6557:talk 6536:talk 6501:talk 6466:talk 6440:talk 6365:talk 6361:Izno 6347:talk 6331:talk 6306:talk 6288:talk 6284:Izno 6270:talk 6251:talk 6200:talk 6185:talk 6154:talk 6140:talk 6118:talk 6076:talk 6072:Izno 6062:talk 6040:talk 6036:Izno 6027:help 6000:help 5859:talk 5797:link 5790:help 5742:talk 5724:talk 5701:talk 5687:talk 5683:Izno 5668:talk 5639:talk 5623:talk 5563:and 5551:and 5538:and 5491:and 5438:talk 5414:talk 5400:talk 5396:Izno 5382:talk 5378:Izno 5368:talk 5353:talk 5349:Izno 5297:and 5280:talk 5247:Here 5209:talk 5191:talk 5159:talk 5142:talk 5086:talk 5032:talk 5017:and 4913:talk 4871:talk 4832:talk 4818:link 4804:2008 4712:talk 4696:2008 4665:link 4651:2008 4591:talk 4585:. – 4496:talk 4463:data 4459:work 4429:talk 4411:talk 4389:talk 4368:talk 4342:talk 4338:Izno 4320:talk 4271:talk 4249:talk 4228:talk 4170:talk 4159:harv 4142:note 4120:note 4077:talk 4050:talk 3981:this 3971:and 3965:work 3955:The 3933:talk 3913:talk 3836:talk 3727:and 3708:talk 3676:talk 3655:and 3623:and 3540:help 3504:and 3487:help 3441:help 3395:help 3349:help 3303:help 3226:talk 3092:OSTI 3076:OCLC 3072:ISSN 3056:ASIN 3051:SSRN 3026:PMID 3018:LCCN 3010:ISMN 3006:ISBN 2964:talk 2916:PMID 2908:OCLC 2904:LCCN 2900:ISSN 2888:ASIN 2879:SSRN 2875:OSTI 2832:ISMN 2828:ISBN 2732:talk 2614:talk 2588:and 2584:and 2580:and 2551:and 2527:and 2523:and 2519:and 2495:and 2491:and 2446:help 2336:talk 2232:talk 2228:Izno 2226:. -- 2212:talk 2191:talk 2172:talk 2150:talk 2146:Izno 2133:talk 2095:talk 2077:talk 2050:talk 2035:link 2028:help 1993:talk 1989:Izno 1979:help 1956:talk 1952:Izno 1941:talk 1927:help 1891:and 1885:re: 1883:Izno 1862:talk 1858:Izno 1847:talk 1826:talk 1822:Izno 1750:cite 1729:talk 1708:add 1660:|in= 1601:|in= 1523:talk 1454:talk 1407:per 1315:talk 1307:text 1266:talk 1249:talk 1231:talk 1210:talk 1193:this 1153:this 1091:talk 1053:talk 1026:both 1016:talk 975:talk 930:talk 908:asem 861:talk 799:talk 764:talk 760:Izno 731:talk 610:talk 606:Izno 596:talk 577:talk 540:, a 484:talk 480:Moxy 462:talk 390:help 309:2011 198:talk 186:bots 6551:-- 6168:of 5971:as 5579:to 5577:not 5567:to 5478:or 5102:be: 4905:--> 4358:red 4263:set 4108:or 4088:one 3749:or 3739:in 3637:or 3566:or 3096:ZBL 3084:JFM 3068:HDL 3034:RFC 3022:PMC 3016:, 3002:DOI 2883:ZBL 2867:JFM 2844:RFC 2840:PMC 2824:HDL 2820:DOI 2485:if 1808:"'" 1805:"'" 1802:'"' 1799:'"' 1514:you 1512:Do 1395:😼 1344:😼 1112:not 1030:and 951:NE2 945:to 876:Yes 821:😼 786:😼 677:😼 558:😼 523:😼 441:😼 417:😼 355:😼 289:😼 247:in 227:😼 6625:) 6600:). 6579:}} 6575:{{ 6559:) 6538:) 6503:) 6468:) 6454:}} 6450:{{ 6442:) 6411:}} 6405:{{ 6367:) 6349:) 6333:) 6323:}} 6317:{{ 6308:) 6290:) 6272:) 6253:) 6202:) 6187:) 6174:}} 6170:{{ 6156:) 6142:) 6120:) 6078:) 6064:) 6042:) 6018:: 6016:}} 6012:{{ 5991:: 5989:}} 5985:{{ 5944:· 5940:· 5936:· 5909:) 5888:· 5884:· 5880:· 5861:) 5836:· 5832:· 5828:· 5781:: 5779:}} 5775:{{ 5744:) 5726:) 5703:) 5689:) 5670:) 5641:) 5625:) 5504:, 5500:, 5440:) 5416:) 5402:) 5384:) 5370:) 5362:-- 5355:) 5282:) 5274:-- 5242:}} 5236:{{ 5211:) 5193:) 5161:) 5144:) 5088:) 5045:: 5034:) 4991:. 4969:. 4915:) 4873:) 4859:}} 4853:{{ 4834:) 4814:}} 4810:{{ 4735:) 4714:) 4661:}} 4657:{{ 4629:: 4593:) 4555:) 4498:) 4431:) 4413:) 4391:) 4370:) 4344:) 4322:) 4314:-- 4273:) 4251:) 4230:) 4172:) 4162:}} 4156:{{ 4116:}} 4110:{{ 4106:}} 4100:{{ 4079:) 4052:) 4010:. 4004:. 3939:) 3935:• 3915:) 3899:}} 3893:{{ 3887:}} 3883:{{ 3864:}} 3860:{{ 3856:}} 3852:{{ 3842:) 3838:• 3823:}} 3819:{{ 3815:}} 3811:{{ 3799:}} 3795:{{ 3786:}} 3782:{{ 3777:}} 3771:{{ 3767:}} 3761:{{ 3757:}} 3751:{{ 3747:}} 3741:{{ 3723:, 3710:) 3678:) 3661:}} 3657:{{ 3653:}} 3649:{{ 3532:: 3530:}} 3526:{{ 3478:: 3476:}} 3472:{{ 3458:. 3432:: 3430:}} 3426:{{ 3413:, 3386:: 3384:}} 3380:{{ 3367:, 3340:: 3338:}} 3334:{{ 3321:, 3294:: 3292:}} 3288:{{ 3275:, 3266:}} 3262:{{ 3258:}} 3254:{{ 3228:) 3206:· 3202:· 3198:· 3156:}} 3152:{{ 3094:, 3090:, 3088:MR 3086:, 3082:, 3080:OL 3078:, 3074:, 3070:, 3066:, 3062:, 3058:, 3049:, 3045:, 3041:, 3032:, 3028:, 3024:, 3020:, 3012:, 3008:, 3004:, 2966:) 2946:}} 2942:{{ 2914:, 2912:OL 2910:, 2906:, 2902:, 2898:, 2894:, 2890:, 2881:, 2877:, 2873:, 2871:MR 2869:, 2865:, 2861:, 2857:, 2846:, 2842:, 2838:, 2834:, 2830:, 2826:, 2822:, 2775:· 2771:· 2767:· 2734:) 2706:}} 2702:{{ 2686:· 2682:· 2678:· 2666:}} 2662:{{ 2654:}} 2648:{{ 2632:{{ 2628:}} 2624:{{ 2616:) 2437:: 2435:}} 2431:{{ 2418:, 2383:}} 2379:{{ 2366:· 2362:· 2358:· 2338:) 2305:}} 2301:{{ 2283:· 2279:· 2275:· 2264:}} 2258:{{ 2254:}} 2248:{{ 2234:) 2214:) 2193:) 2174:) 2152:) 2144:-- 2135:) 2115:→ 2097:) 2079:) 2052:) 2019:: 2017:}} 2013:{{ 1995:) 1987:-- 1974:: 1972:}} 1968:{{ 1958:) 1943:) 1922:: 1920:}} 1916:{{ 1911:→ 1864:) 1856:-- 1849:) 1828:) 1820:-- 1790:*/ 1731:) 1714:}} 1710:{{ 1704:: 1689:: 1654:: 1595:: 1578:; 1562:; 1554:: 1525:) 1456:) 1434:· 1430:· 1426:· 1383:— 1332:— 1317:) 1291:· 1287:· 1283:· 1268:) 1251:) 1233:) 1212:) 1174:" 1147:, 1093:) 1081:". 1063:if 1055:) 1018:) 977:) 966:}} 960:{{ 932:) 915:) 904:-- 863:) 809:— 801:) 774:— 766:) 733:) 713:· 709:· 705:· 665:— 644:· 640:· 636:· 612:) 598:) 579:) 546:— 511:— 507:}} 503:{{ 486:) 464:) 429:— 405:— 378:: 376:}} 372:{{ 343:— 330:· 326:· 322:· 277:— 269:}} 265:{{ 253:}} 249:{{ 241:No 215:— 200:) 130:. 91:→ 6621:( 6617:— 6555:( 6534:( 6530:— 6499:( 6495:— 6464:( 6438:( 6363:( 6345:( 6329:( 6304:( 6286:( 6268:( 6249:( 6198:( 6183:( 6179:— 6176:. 6152:( 6138:( 6134:— 6116:( 6074:( 6060:( 6056:— 6053:? 6038:( 6029:) 6002:) 5948:} 5946:b 5942:p 5938:c 5934:t 5932:{ 5905:( 5892:} 5890:b 5886:p 5882:c 5878:t 5876:{ 5857:( 5853:— 5840:} 5838:b 5834:p 5830:c 5826:t 5824:{ 5819:. 5817:: 5813:@ 5799:) 5792:) 5788:( 5740:( 5736:— 5722:( 5699:( 5685:( 5666:( 5637:( 5621:( 5617:— 5575:( 5573:= 5571:n 5451:) 5447:( 5436:( 5412:( 5398:( 5380:( 5366:( 5351:( 5336:n 5332:= 5330:n 5278:( 5207:( 5203:— 5189:( 5157:( 5153:— 5140:( 5084:( 5080:— 5030:( 5019:= 5015:= 4932:C 4911:( 4895:C 4869:( 4830:( 4826:— 4820:) 4806:. 4777:C 4764:: 4760:@ 4749:) 4746:c 4743:( 4732:t 4729:( 4725:: 4721:@ 4710:( 4706:— 4698:. 4667:) 4653:. 4611:C 4589:( 4569:) 4566:c 4563:( 4552:t 4549:( 4509:: 4505:@ 4494:( 4427:( 4409:( 4402:: 4398:@ 4387:( 4381:: 4377:@ 4366:( 4340:( 4318:( 4300:: 4296:@ 4269:( 4247:( 4241:: 4237:@ 4226:( 4209:→ 4191:: 4187:@ 4183:: 4179:@ 4168:( 4075:( 4048:( 4044:— 4030:) 3931:( 3911:( 3907:— 3902:. 3834:( 3830:— 3706:( 3702:— 3674:( 3670:— 3542:) 3522:. 3516:: 3489:) 3468:. 3462:: 3443:) 3417:: 3397:) 3371:: 3351:) 3325:: 3305:) 3279:: 3224:( 3220:— 3210:} 3208:b 3204:p 3200:c 3196:t 3194:{ 3187:: 3183:@ 2962:( 2958:— 2779:} 2777:b 2773:p 2769:c 2765:t 2763:{ 2730:( 2726:— 2716:. 2690:} 2688:b 2684:p 2680:c 2676:t 2674:{ 2612:( 2608:— 2469:: 2448:) 2422:: 2370:} 2368:b 2364:p 2360:c 2356:t 2354:{ 2334:( 2330:— 2287:} 2285:b 2281:p 2277:c 2273:t 2271:{ 2230:( 2210:( 2206:— 2203:. 2189:( 2185:— 2170:( 2148:( 2131:( 2127:— 2093:( 2075:( 2048:( 2044:— 2039:. 2037:) 2030:) 1991:( 1981:) 1954:( 1939:( 1935:— 1929:) 1881:@ 1860:( 1845:( 1841:— 1824:( 1814:} 1811:; 1796:: 1786:{ 1783:q 1780:} 1777:; 1771:: 1759:{ 1753:. 1727:( 1723:— 1521:( 1489:C 1452:( 1438:} 1436:b 1432:p 1428:c 1424:t 1422:{ 1393:¢ 1390:☏ 1363:C 1342:¢ 1339:☏ 1313:( 1295:} 1293:b 1289:p 1285:c 1281:t 1279:{ 1264:( 1247:( 1229:( 1208:( 1089:( 1051:( 1014:( 973:( 928:( 913:t 911:( 906:M 889:→ 859:( 833:: 829:@ 819:¢ 816:☏ 797:( 784:¢ 781:☏ 762:( 729:( 717:} 715:b 711:p 707:c 703:t 701:{ 675:¢ 672:☏ 648:} 646:b 642:p 638:c 634:t 632:{ 608:( 594:( 575:( 556:¢ 553:☏ 521:¢ 518:☏ 482:( 460:( 439:¢ 436:☏ 415:¢ 412:☏ 392:) 388:( 353:¢ 350:☏ 334:} 332:b 328:p 324:c 320:t 318:{ 311:. 287:¢ 284:☏ 225:¢ 222:☏ 196:( 150:) 146:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index