1813:
impeccably sourced since I would be reverting him for the second time. I don't prefer to put him into the position of deciding whether to revert it again or not. I am not the contentious type. I have a problem with the photo since it doesn't include the presence of medical personnel(who may be the most common vector of nosocomial infections, but since that comes out in the article anyway. It is not a 'fair' photo since operating theatres are pretty 'clean' places with constant removal of airborne fomites. I guess I don't think it a good representation, that's all. Obviously Doc James disagrees. Best
Regards,
1198:
not a technical term, people may also say "infection I got in the hospital", "complication from surgery", "disease I got at the doctor's office" or any number of other things which are less precise, but still not a technical term. My reason for proposing the move was to avoid jargon, and not necessarily to identify the single term most used in publication. I feel that very few
English speakers would immediately recognize and understand this term and that many more would understand the term "hospital-acquired infection".
185:
164:
2401:
1715:
I deleted the statements that I could find in the article that seems to be expressing opinion so the ones I described above are now gone. There may be more. Not a problem-I will just remove them when I see them. The cut and paste issue is resolved; the POV is not. No further action is necessary. As I go about my article edit-a-thon I will remove editorial/pov statements as I find them. Best
Regards,
342:
22:
74:
53:
1038:. Would renaming the article "Hospital-acquired infection" and editing it to start "A hospital-acquired infection (HAI), known technically as a nosocomial infection, is..." really amount to dumbing-down..? I imagine there are already quite a few medical names / terms / etc under colloquial / unofficial / non-technical titles in this general encyclopedia.
84:
2277:
257:
1680:
2606:, which is also understandable to ordinary English speakers. MeSH gives these: Health Care Associated Infection, Health Care Associated Infections, Healthcare Associated Infections, Hospital Infections, Infection, Cross, Infections, Hospital, Infections, Nosocomial, and Nosocomial Infections, under a heading of
1863:
My next personal edit-athon will involve this article. If another editor wants to collaborate with me, I certainly welcome their involvement. I tag the article for point of view issues because some of the language appears to me to be over emphasize certain methods of transmission over others; that is
657:
A "nosocomial" infection is an infection that develops after admission to the healthcare facility. It does not imply that the healthcare facility caused the infection, that the infecting organism was acquired in the facility, or that it was preventable. An infection which results from medical care or
1786:
Practically all photos submitted are original research and almost none are tied to any source. There is no routine process for demanding that photos have explicit backing of sources. This is a problem but it is also the current state of
Knowledge (XXG) quality, so I am not concerned immediately that
1714:
Dear Blue, if that statement appears or appeared in the wikipedia article, no matter the source, the phrase: "needs to be on (an) agenda" indicates an opinion, or point of view, or at worst some kind of advice. I am a little confused because I thought we were discussing POV. How is the POV resolved?
1618:
The content was cut and pasted from the above website which is taking credit for its content but allowing it to be used under CCA-3 (I hope I got that number right...). It is word-for-word cut and paste (before I got to work on it) from a primary source,i.e., it is one journal article acting like an
1540:
that deserves no weight in an encyclopedia article. Some muslim students are working with the hospital in which they are training to negotiate a way to meet the requirements of good hospital hand-washing practice while abiding by their religious practice. It will get worked out, and will be over.
1197:
I do not think that it is necessary to see hard data of the sort which Apteva provided because I think that the opinions of
English-speaking persons who visit this page can constitute enough specific evidence to make a decision. "Hospital-acquired infection" is not the most common name. Since it is
480:
I don't see any discussion of the potential for the stethoscope to transmit nosocomial infection. Most doctors do wash their hands, but few do anything to clean the stethoscope between patient visits. Doesn't the stethoscope bell have virtually the same infection spreading potential as the hands?
1812:
Thanks for communicating with me about this. Right now it is a moot point since Doc James reverted the photo and so even if I find a photo that is better sourced (perhaps from the CDC), a health dept., from an infectious control specialist it wouldn't matter. I can't insert a photo even if it were
414:
Hi, my name is
Christine Blouin. I am currently enrolled in school, training to be a Medical Assistant at CEI in Somerville, Massachusettes. I was assigned to a presentation in my Aseptic class on Sanitization. I was just wondering how i can find out which hospital in the nation or in the state of
1224:
apply? I really wish the first ref weren't dead, because I want to know the etymolgy of "nosocomial." Hearing "nosocomial infection" without context, I'd assume it refers to a class of infections with some sort of biological relationship. If it's just a sort of jargony euphemism for any infection
1767:
The original photo is from one photographer who loaded it up to commons. Another editor took the photo and put little icons all over the photo where he believes that a nosocomial infection can be acquired. You can't doctor up (pun intended) a photo to prove an encyclopedic statement unless those
1657:"...Visitors and healthcare personnel are equally to blame in transmitting infection...", the word blame catches my eye, it is also unsourced unless you count a cut and paste a source. Using the word blame indicates to me that someone, without documentation, can ascribe blame. That is POV for me.
975:
is the article's current traffic, which is currently 33,000 people per month making it popular enough to assume that non-specialists from the general public are coming here for information. Because non-specialists are the primary readership, and because most of the content of this article is
2361:
554:
Referencing "A ratio of 5 to 19% hospitalized patients are infected". Besides being grammatically incorrect - "of" should be inserted after "19%", IF the remainder is correct, "5 to 19%" (by which I *presume*, but do NOT know for sure, they mean 5% to 19%) is NOT a "ratio".
2262:
1571:
I am tagging this article because it is not neutral. It reads like something someone would write if they wanted to highlight the 'evilness' of nosocomial infections. It's like it is an editorial. It is really not an encyclopedia article in its current form.
1768:
specific locations are somehow cited in a MEDRS source. The photo itself is an editorial statement and at best unsourced. It should be removed. It is used all over other wikis without a problem. You can't use a graphic relaying unsourced information.
2362:
https://link.springer.com/epdf/10.1007/s12109-020-09750-0?sharing_token=-Kdjc4Vwp59b3KZ6uHgDave4RwlQNchNByi7wbcMAY4zL2q_VjfJmW6twqPCXJPXlqW5_aE7qZ7HWX3KWOmI1rC75-j9MEV2tAZ8OTJF9lboVHukkDv5VdfLmO0zcnoLBg8bHnV0lkHKl54JJc8mrfhI3-WubEpLDKrsjp-W8dg%3D
2151:
I found this to be mildly interesting. This article was copy-pasted for use in a medical article which was retracted for a number of reasons. "Fragments of text overlap with text from the "Hospital-acquired infection" entry on
Knowledge (XXG):
347:
This article is substantially duplicated by a piece in an external publication. Since the external publication copied
Knowledge (XXG) rather than the reverse, please do not flag this article as a copyright violation of the following source:
2547:
Google Ngrams seems to position it as by far the common name. It has been going down in use and may be supplanted by "health care-associated" soon, but still not there yet. Either way, "hospital-acquired" is definitely not the common name.
2263:
https://web.archive.org/web/20151208113110/https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/331871/English_National_Point_Prevalence_Survey_on_Healthcare_associated_Infections_and_Antimicrobial_Use_2011.pdf
1298:. "Nosocomial infection" seems to be the most popular term in this case but by these numbers perhaps it is used in fewer than half of the articles on the topic. "Hospital infection" and "nosocomial infection" are used together in
899:
I am a microbiologist and not a doctor, so I do not know if the list of common pathogens is correct. If it is correct, the lead is wrong as the species listed are mostly Gram positive. In brief one of the two sections is wrong.
574:
Hi.There are strict criteria for an infection to be nosocomial, but nobody's considering about healthcare workers.Healthcare workers can also be infected by these pathogens.Do we also accept these infections as nosocomial?----
2266:
1734:
I have difficulty having more than one discussion at once. I saw the end to the copyright violation discussion and thought the entire concern was resolved. It was my mistake, but it seems the other issue is resolved also.
1864:
to say my impression is that the article was written by someone who has possibly experienced this kind of infection. I could be way out there, I realize. But the article does not seem to be written in a neutral manner.
821:
Nosocomial infections
Infections that were not present before the patient came to a hospital, but were acquired by a patient while in the hospital. Mentioned in: Enterobacterial Infections, Staphylococcal Infections
235:
828:
nosocomial infections those acquired during hospitalization or during attendance at any veterinary medical facility. (See above reference) This needs to be expanded. There is a type of MRSA carried by pigs.
1092:
Except that nosocomial... gets 597,000 ghits vs 271,000 for hospital... In google books it is 81,300 to 18,700. In google news it is 7 to 99 (which caters to the public, avoiding four syllable words). --
2675:
225:
1508:
Thats easy, they exist to make money for their shareholders. Same reason the
National Enquirer exists. The also have the additional purpose of promoting the political agenda of those that own them.
298:
705:
2680:
2583:
201:
1660:"...hospital indoor air quality needs to be on agenda in management." This is an editorial statement. If it is a statement from the primary source that is cited, it would need to be in quotes.
1619:
encyclopedia article. It may even be self published since the website invites others to publish their work via the website. The name of the website is Project Gutenburg Self-publishing Press.
2267:
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/331871/English_National_Point_Prevalence_Survey_on_Healthcare_associated_Infections_and_Antimicrobial_Use_2011.pdf
726:
2670:
1180:
We need to see some specific evidence that the suggested title really is the common name. So far the evidence provided by Apteva suggests that nosocomial infection may be more common.
684:
192:
169:
102:
2516:– The current title ignores non-hospital related infections. Nosocomial infections also include veterinary practices. Nosocomial infection is also more common on Google Scholar
1790:
I think that the image is intended to illustrate points in the room which health care providers and patients touch often. I think that the picture communicates the concept of a
267:
106:
292:
1303:
2441:
2095:
2091:
2077:
1959:
1955:
1941:
1688:
383:
2437:
1107:
I think the difference is that the article names implied are, respectively, "Nosocomial infection" and "Hospital-acquired infection". But am I missing the point..?
1299:
1306:
articles. There are different ways to interpret this information, but it is not correct to say that "nosocomial" is the only term used in scholarly literature.
706:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=ambulance+Sanitation+Standard+Operating+Procedures+%22nosocomial+infection%22&btnG=Search&aq=f&oq=&aqi=
1264:
See above - only news uses hospital more than nosocomial. I do not have to check google scholar, which would likely solely use nosocomial instead of hospital.
146:
2660:
136:
1244:
484:
727:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22ambulance+transport%22+%22nosocomial+infection%22+filetype%3Apdf&btnG=Search&aq=f&oq=&aqi=
1449:
2034:
after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add
685:
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=%22ambulance%20transport%22%20%22nosocomial%20infections%22&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=ws
2665:
311:
1438:
This was added "In the United Kingdom, some people are exempt from hand-hygiene and this has led to criticism from professionals and patients."
1287:
2587:
111:
1108:
1039:
769:
Sabine Wicker, Dr. med.,1* Holger F. Rabenau, Prof. Dr. rer. med.,2 Volkhard A. J. Kempf, Prof. Dr. med.,3 and Christian Brandt, Dr.med.4
932:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
2449:
2440:
within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the
1492:
1291:
1026:
643:
616:
488:
780:
Review Article Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2009 September; 106(36): 567–572. Published online 2009 September 4. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2009.0567.
520:
Unfortunately most doctors do not wash there hands as per the medical literature. Neither do nurse or people after using the toilet.--
2655:
1295:
1130:
733:
712:
691:
659:
2272:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
97:
58:
2602:
I don't feel strongly about this, but I'd rather leave it at the less jargon-y name. It looks like we also have a redirect from
2567:
1225:
acquired in a hospital, it should be avoided. If it's a discreet class in medical literature, it should probably be retained per
1187:
2603:
1521:
1471:
590:
33:
197:
1163:– Only specialists have ever heard the word "nosocomial", but practially everyone is aware of hospital-aquired infections. —
2476:
805:
326:
2636:
2314:
533:
2433:
967:– I propose that the title of this article be changed from "Nosocomial infection" to "Hospital-acquired infection" per
923:
399:
from retraction - "Fragments of text overlap with text from the "Hospital-acquired infection" entry on Knowledge (XXG)"
2507:
2408:
2246:
2019:
1891:
1525:
1475:
964:
950:
2445:
2611:
1833:. As you like - the conversation is resolved now if you wish it to be, or it can continue if you want it to do so.
2631:
I don't have strong opinions on this however I do think hospital acquired may be a more commonly recognized term.
2412:
1919:
2380:
1450:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-519072/Muslim-medics-refuse-roll-sleeves-hygiene-crackdown--religion.html
755:
Reduction of the nosocomial influenza A burden in a paediatric hospital by immunisation of the healthcare workers
2094:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1958:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
2685:
1794:, and it seems like a fair example to me. Can you say more about why you feel that the image is inappropriate?
1151:
1112:
1043:
537:
1401:
933:
39:
647:
492:
2632:
2464:
2305:
2254:
1872:
1820:
1773:
1722:
1665:
1624:
1584:
1496:
1022:
737:
716:
695:
663:
620:
2172:
1488:
968:
793:
639:
612:
578:
353:
2619:
2521:
2250:
2224:
1841:
1802:
1743:
1699:
1647:
1605:
1314:
1206:
1134:
998:
946:
1546:
1416:
2340:
2289:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
2133:
2113:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
2101:
1997:
1977:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1965:
1597:
Are you suggesting this Knowledge (XXG) article is a copyright violation or was inappropriately copied?
1168:
606:
465:
means that physicans are unable to reach a definitive cause for your pre-existing infection/disease. --
200:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
2453:
2253:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
2042:
to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
445:
2376:
2068:
1184:
960:
905:
870:
306:
1542:
760:
582:
21:
1517:
1467:
1147:
859:
586:
556:
430:
1576:
1537:
1126:
797:
2189:
1868:
1816:
1783:
1769:
1718:
1661:
1620:
1594:
1580:
1423:
1018:
885:
855:
833:
560:
2098:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1962:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1354:, with the technical version "nosocomial infection" included in the article's opening sentence.
184:
163:
2290:
2114:
1978:
747:
Mitigation -- Nosocomial influenza infection rates are reduced by vaccination of hospital staff
508:
2615:
2592:
2571:
2553:
2533:
2517:
2330:
2217:
2029:
1901:
1834:
1795:
1736:
1692:
1640:
1598:
1378:
1307:
1199:
991:
801:
505:
363:
1636:
2336:
2204:
2129:
1993:
1554:
1485:
Okay, so why does Daily mail and Telegraph exist if they do not provide any correct stuff?
1269:
1164:
1097:
781:
529:
2297:
2121:
1985:
875:
2607:
2367:
2037:
1909:
1579:. It has all the right copyright permissions but it is still poorly written and sourced.
1359:
1181:
1146:
Don't use complex specialist terms unless we have to, and in this case, we don't have to.
901:
847:
376:
89:
1687:
That source copied Knowledge (XXG). Knowledge (XXG) did not copy them. See discussion at
1391:
2640:
2623:
2596:
2575:
2557:
2537:
2384:
2346:
2319:
2229:
2208:
2193:
2141:
2005:
1876:
1846:
1824:
1807:
1777:
1748:
1726:
1704:
1669:
1652:
1628:
1610:
1588:
1558:
1529:
1500:
1479:
1428:
1382:
1363:
1344:
1321:
1273:
1259:
1238:
1213:
1192:
1172:
1155:
1138:
1116:
1101:
1047:
1030:
1005:
954:
909:
889:
837:
809:
784:
741:
720:
699:
667:
651:
624:
594:
564:
541:
511:
496:
469:
448:
433:
2080:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
1944:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
1509:
1459:
1335:
I humbly suggest my comments above may help guide this RM to an appropriate outcome. --
1302:
articles, and "hospital acquired infection" and "nosocomial infection" are together in
976:
non-technical, I think that this article should use the non-specialist term. Thoughts?
787:
466:
272:
2296:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
2120:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
2087:
1984:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1951:
972:
2649:
2185:
2047:
1419:
1340:
1255:
1234:
986:
881:
851:
829:
2549:
1374:
2153:
636:
i want to know about the symptoms of wound infection in post open heart surgery.
2200:
1550:
1265:
1093:
521:
1920:
https://web.archive.org/20071111044129/http://www.chuv.ch/swiss-noso/f121a1.htm
2086:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
1950:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
1400:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
1355:
507:). Why not read some of the articles and contribute to the wikipedia article?
461:
455:
341:
79:
2357:
677:
2333:
2199:
wow, this is about the fifth time this has happened, including a textbook!
1923:
1689:
Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Medicine/Archive_75#Hospital_Acquired_Infections
1336:
1251:
1230:
982:
2173:"Retraction: Metagenomic Human Repiratory Air in a Hospital Environment"
1906:
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add
196:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to
1226:
1221:
2284:
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
1791:
444:
Can anyone tell me the difference between nosocomial and idiopathic?
320:
287:
850:
Neckties a very contaminated object. A good way to cut infections.
256:
73:
52:
1914:
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
871:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/health/article1323962.ece
265:
for Knowledge (XXG)'s health content are defined in the guideline
1635:
Can you give an example of a statement or section which violates
761:
http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/eccmid15/abstract.asp?id=36255
459:
essentially means an infection you acquired in a hospital, while
109:. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at
2428:
2147:
Retraction of study gives Knowledge (XXG) as one of the reasons
2395:
1731:
Okay, I agree, those statements are POV and should be removed.
773:
Vaccination Against Classical Influenza in Health-Care Workers
352:
Lai YY, Li Y, Lang J, Tong X, Zhang L, Fang J; et al. (2015),
336:
251:
15:
1243:
I also note that the most used reference in the article, the
101:, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the
2053:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
1929:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
426:
2257:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
355:
Metagenomic Human Repiratory Air in a Hospital Environment
210:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health
2329:
There is now a global-scale systematic review available:
824:] nosocomial pertaining to or originating in a hospital.
2018:
I have just added archive links to one external link on
1890:
I have just added archive links to one external link on
922:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a
876:
http://www.mrsainfection.org/mrsa-in-the-netherlands.php
2512:
2497:
2493:
2489:
2417:
2368:
https://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/27/business/27germ.html
2213:
2023:
1895:
1830:
848:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125859205137154753.html
268:
Knowledge (XXG):Identifying reliable sources (medicine)
2676:
Top-importance Occupational Safety and Health articles
1545:
and we don't discuss passing trivia. Please also see
1294:
for "nosocomial infection". "Hospital infection" gets
1390:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
2154:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Hospital-acquired_infection
788:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2770210/
2681:
WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health articles
2090:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
1954:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
1458:Daily Mail as a source is good for mostly nothing.
936:. No further edits should be made to this section.
751:Engels, Goldman, Doyen, Duyse, Van Beers, Vergison
312:
clinical publications about evidence-based medicine
213:
Template:WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health
2372:
1404:. No further edits should be made to this section.
504:Your concerns have been researched by others (see
425:Try the Massachusetts Department of Public Health
2048:http://www.general-anaesthesia.com/semmelweis.htm
1373:, based on the policies and data outlined above.
1250:, doesn't mention the specialist term at all. --
418:Thank You so much for your time& attention,
415:Massachusettes has the LOWEST nosocomial rates?
2671:C-Class Occupational Safety and Health articles
2568:Special:PermanentLink/1244857656#Requested move
1073:
1056:
1017:is the proper term. Let's not dumb it down. •••
680:services has not been thoroughly researched...
105:and that biomedical information in any article
2076:This message was posted before February 2018.
1940:This message was posted before February 2018.
103:Manual of Style for medicine-related articles
8:
673:Prevention of the infection when using .....
658:treatment would be considered "iatrogenic".
605:However, this may be the solution for that
2584:WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health
2407:It has been proposed in this section that
2358:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-020-09750-0
2245:I have just modified one external link on
1486:
390:
193:WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health
158:
47:
1787:this photo is lower than average quality.
382:CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
112:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Medicine
1924:http://www.chuv.ch/swiss-noso/f121a1.htm
293:review articles from the past five years
2590:have been notified of this discussion.
2364:) mentioned plagiarism in this article,
2164:
1442:
216:Occupational Safety and Health articles
160:
49:
19:
1290:for "hospital acquired infection" and
775:Self-Protection and Patient Protection
372:
361:
2065:to let others know (documentation at
817:Veterinary hospital acquired diseases
7:
1575:This article is cut and pasted from
941:The result of the move request was:
321:Centre for Reviews and Dissemination
190:This article is within the scope of
121:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Medicine
95:This article is within the scope of
1417:doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.9763
38:It is of interest to the following
2214:I noted this as a "backwards copy"
14:
2661:High-importance medicine articles
2432:will list this discussion on the
2371:It was confirmed with this tool:
2249:. Please take a moment to review
2022:. Please take a moment to review
1894:. Please take a moment to review
318:Other potential sources include:
2524:) 22:10, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
2399:
2275:
1678:
1415:Meta-analysis as to cost in USA
340:
255:
183:
162:
107:use high-quality medical sources
82:
72:
51:
20:
2604:Healthcare-associated infection
2390:Requested move 8 September 2024
989:) 21:56, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
230:This article has been rated as
141:This article has been rated as
2666:All WikiProject Medicine pages
2641:15:54, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
2624:05:50, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
2597:04:52, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
2576:04:52, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
2538:04:52, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
2373:https://copyvios.toolforge.org
2046:Attempted to fix sourcing for
595:12:18, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
207:Occupational Safety and Health
198:occupational safety and health
170:Occupational Safety and Health
1:
2558:16:26, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
1877:11:12, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
1847:15:31, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
1825:14:28, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
1808:13:43, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
1778:21:06, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
1749:15:33, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
1727:14:41, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
1705:13:46, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
1670:20:44, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
1653:18:08, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
1629:20:39, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
1611:18:07, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
1589:16:34, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
1429:21:59, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
1345:21:56, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
1322:14:54, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
1274:11:47, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
1260:18:07, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
1239:18:06, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
1214:16:25, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
1193:16:05, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
1173:18:10, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
1156:03:03, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
1139:06:17, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
1117:13:05, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
1102:04:26, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
1048:16:31, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
1031:02:10, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
1006:19:15, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
890:06:27, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
860:06:26, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
838:06:25, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
810:01:23, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
565:19:58, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
470:04:02, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
449:20:39, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
279:sources of information about
204:and see a list of open tasks.
124:Template:WikiProject Medicine
2444:). Please base arguments on
2347:21:11, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
2320:23:52, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
1559:16:26, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
1530:00:26, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
1501:16:20, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
1480:15:14, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
1383:16:18, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
955:15:09, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
742:02:13, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
721:02:11, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
700:02:04, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
668:19:48, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
2508:Hospital-acquired infection
2409:Hospital-acquired infection
2247:Hospital-acquired infection
2020:Hospital-acquired infection
2006:11:28, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
1892:Hospital-acquired infection
1364:16:44, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
1077:hospital-acquired infection
1064:hospital-acquired infection
965:Hospital-acquired infection
910:21:26, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
652:18:10, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
625:01:23, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
434:14:31, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
371:Explicit use of et al. in:
281:Hospital-acquired infection
2702:
2612:Cross-species transmission
2566:: Cannot be soft move per
2242:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
2230:13:53, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
2209:00:15, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
2194:00:05, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
2142:22:22, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
2107:(last update: 5 June 2024)
2040:|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
2015:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
1971:(last update: 5 June 2024)
1912:|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
1887:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
1676:
1536:more importantly, this is
945:: majority after 51 days.
759:Abstract number: 1133_242
497:22:13, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
236:project's importance scale
147:project's importance scale
2656:C-Class medicine articles
2385:16:44, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
2360:(full paper with paywall
542:05:10, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
229:
178:
140:
67:
46:
1397:Please do not modify it.
929:Please do not modify it.
865:Holland wins MRSA battle
842:
512:17:16, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
427:http://www.mass.gov/dph/
2238:External links modified
2011:External links modified
1883:External links modified
2448:, and keep discussion
1763:Problem with the photo
1088:
1072:be any different from
1071:
28:This article is rated
2610:, which redirects to
2366:copy paste i.e from
607:Talk:Fluorescent lamp
487:comment was added by
32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
2588:WikiProject Medicine
2513:Nosocomial infection
2477:requested move/dated
2465:subst:requested move
2446:article title policy
2442:closing instructions
2436:current discussions
2418:Nosocomial infection
2088:regular verification
1952:regular verification
1937:to let others know.
1898:. If necessary, add
1085:nosocomial infection
1060:nosocomial infection
961:Nosocomial infection
299:free review articles
275:. Here are links to
98:WikiProject Medicine
2078:After February 2018
2057:parameter below to
1942:After February 2018
1933:parameter below to
601:Yes, definately :-)
394:Additional comments
2633:IntentionallyDense
2308:InternetArchiveBot
2083:InternetArchiveBot
1947:InternetArchiveBot
1083:, also known as a
1062:, also known as a
271:and are typically
34:content assessment
2599:
2578:
2564:Relisting comment
2540:
2505:
2504:
2500:
2483:
2413:renamed and moved
2345:
2325:Prevalence update
2140:
2108:
2004:
1972:
1503:
1491:comment added by
1426:
1333:Relisting comment
1190:
1036:Comment / support
990:
947:Anthony Appleyard
843:Doctor's Neckties
813:
796:comment added by
642:comment added by
615:comment added by
581:comment added by
570:heathcare workers
500:
407:
406:
403:
402:
335:
334:
250:
249:
246:
245:
242:
241:
157:
156:
153:
152:
127:medicine articles
2693:
2595:
2581:
2574:
2562:
2536:
2525:
2515:
2485:
2480:
2468:
2459:
2431:
2420:
2403:
2402:
2396:
2343:
2339:
2318:
2309:
2282:
2279:
2278:
2227:
2222:
2177:
2176:
2169:
2136:
2135:Talk to my owner
2131:
2106:
2105:
2084:
2072:
2041:
2033:
2000:
1999:Talk to my owner
1995:
1970:
1969:
1948:
1913:
1905:
1844:
1839:
1805:
1800:
1746:
1741:
1702:
1697:
1682:
1681:
1650:
1645:
1608:
1603:
1514:
1464:
1452:
1447:
1424:
1399:
1319:
1318:
1312:
1211:
1210:
1204:
1188:
1003:
1002:
996:
977:
931:
812:
790:
654:
627:
597:
526:
482:
391:
387:
380:
374:
369:
367:
359:
344:
337:
259:
252:
218:
217:
214:
211:
208:
187:
180:
179:
174:
166:
159:
129:
128:
125:
122:
119:
92:
87:
86:
85:
76:
69:
68:
63:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
2701:
2700:
2696:
2695:
2694:
2692:
2691:
2690:
2686:Requested moves
2646:
2645:
2608:Cross infection
2591:
2570:
2532:
2511:
2501:
2474:
2462:
2434:requested moves
2427:
2416:
2400:
2392:
2354:
2341:
2327:
2312:
2307:
2280:
2276:
2255:this simple FaQ
2240:
2225:
2218:
2182:
2181:
2180:
2171:
2170:
2166:
2149:
2139:
2134:
2099:
2092:have permission
2082:
2066:
2035:
2027:
2013:
2003:
1998:
1963:
1956:have permission
1946:
1907:
1899:
1885:
1861:
1842:
1835:
1831:your discussion
1803:
1796:
1765:
1744:
1737:
1700:
1693:
1685:
1684:
1679:
1648:
1641:
1606:
1599:
1569:
1510:
1460:
1456:
1455:
1448:
1444:
1436:
1413:
1408:
1395:
1316:
1315:
1308:
1208:
1207:
1200:
1000:
999:
992:
927:
917:
897:
867:
845:
819:
791:
749:
675:
637:
634:
610:
576:
572:
552:
522:
483:—The preceding
478:
442:
412:
381:
370:
360:
351:
277:possibly useful
273:review articles
215:
212:
209:
206:
205:
172:
143:High-importance
126:
123:
120:
117:
116:
90:Medicine portal
88:
83:
81:
62:High‑importance
61:
29:
12:
11:
5:
2699:
2697:
2689:
2688:
2683:
2678:
2673:
2668:
2663:
2658:
2648:
2647:
2644:
2643:
2626:
2600:
2579:
2560:
2503:
2502:
2484:
2458:
2424:
2423:
2404:
2391:
2388:
2375:
2370:
2365:
2353:
2350:
2326:
2323:
2302:
2301:
2294:
2270:
2269:
2261:Added archive
2239:
2236:
2235:
2234:
2233:
2232:
2220:Blue Rasberry
2179:
2178:
2163:
2162:
2158:
2148:
2145:
2132:
2126:
2125:
2118:
2051:
2050:
2026:. You may add
2012:
2009:
1996:
1990:
1989:
1982:
1927:
1926:
1918:Added archive
1884:
1881:
1880:
1879:
1860:
1859:Major revision
1857:
1856:
1855:
1854:
1853:
1852:
1851:
1850:
1849:
1837:Blue Rasberry
1798:Blue Rasberry
1788:
1764:
1761:
1760:
1759:
1758:
1757:
1756:
1755:
1754:
1753:
1752:
1751:
1739:Blue Rasberry
1732:
1695:Blue Rasberry
1677:
1675:
1674:
1673:
1672:
1658:
1643:Blue Rasberry
1633:
1632:
1631:
1616:
1601:Blue Rasberry
1568:
1565:
1564:
1563:
1562:
1561:
1534:
1533:
1532:
1454:
1453:
1441:
1440:
1435:
1432:
1412:
1409:
1407:
1406:
1392:requested move
1386:
1385:
1367:
1366:
1348:
1347:
1329:
1328:
1327:
1326:
1325:
1324:
1310:Blue Rasberry
1279:
1278:
1277:
1276:
1246:New York Times
1241:
1218:
1217:
1216:
1202:Blue Rasberry
1175:
1158:
1148:Ego White Tray
1141:
1120:
1119:
1109:213.246.91.158
1090:
1089:
1050:
1040:213.246.91.158
1033:
994:Blue Rasberry
958:
939:
938:
924:requested move
918:
916:
915:Requested move
913:
896:
895:Gram negative?
893:
879:
878:
873:
866:
863:
844:
841:
826:
818:
815:
765:
748:
745:
730:
729:
709:
708:
688:
687:
674:
671:
633:
630:
571:
568:
551:
548:
547:
546:
545:
544:
515:
514:
477:
474:
473:
472:
441:
438:
437:
436:
411:
408:
405:
404:
401:
400:
396:
395:
389:
388:
345:
333:
332:
331:
330:
316:
303:
284:
260:
248:
247:
244:
243:
240:
239:
232:Top-importance
228:
222:
221:
219:
202:the discussion
188:
176:
175:
173:Top‑importance
167:
155:
154:
151:
150:
139:
133:
132:
130:
94:
93:
77:
65:
64:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2698:
2687:
2684:
2682:
2679:
2677:
2674:
2672:
2669:
2667:
2664:
2662:
2659:
2657:
2654:
2653:
2651:
2642:
2638:
2634:
2630:
2627:
2625:
2621:
2617:
2613:
2609:
2605:
2601:
2598:
2594:
2593:Safari Scribe
2589:
2585:
2580:
2577:
2573:
2572:Safari Scribe
2569:
2565:
2561:
2559:
2555:
2551:
2546:
2543:
2542:
2541:
2539:
2535:
2534:Safari Scribe
2531:
2530:
2523:
2519:
2514:
2509:
2499:
2495:
2491:
2488:
2482:
2478:
2472:
2466:
2457:
2455:
2451:
2447:
2443:
2439:
2435:
2430:
2422:
2419:
2414:
2410:
2405:
2398:
2397:
2394:
2389:
2387:
2386:
2382:
2378:
2374:
2369:
2363:
2359:
2351:
2349:
2348:
2344:
2338:
2335:
2332:
2324:
2322:
2321:
2316:
2311:
2310:
2299:
2295:
2292:
2288:
2287:
2286:
2285:
2273:
2268:
2264:
2260:
2259:
2258:
2256:
2252:
2248:
2243:
2237:
2231:
2228:
2223:
2221:
2215:
2212:
2211:
2210:
2206:
2202:
2198:
2197:
2196:
2195:
2191:
2187:
2174:
2168:
2165:
2161:
2157:
2155:
2146:
2144:
2143:
2137:
2130:
2123:
2119:
2116:
2112:
2111:
2110:
2103:
2097:
2093:
2089:
2085:
2079:
2074:
2070:
2064:
2060:
2056:
2049:
2045:
2044:
2043:
2039:
2031:
2025:
2021:
2016:
2010:
2008:
2007:
2001:
1994:
1987:
1983:
1980:
1976:
1975:
1974:
1967:
1961:
1957:
1953:
1949:
1943:
1938:
1936:
1932:
1925:
1921:
1917:
1916:
1915:
1911:
1903:
1897:
1893:
1888:
1882:
1878:
1874:
1870:
1869:Barbara (WVS)
1867:
1866:
1865:
1858:
1848:
1845:
1840:
1838:
1832:
1828:
1827:
1826:
1822:
1818:
1817:Barbara (WVS)
1815:
1814:
1811:
1810:
1809:
1806:
1801:
1799:
1793:
1789:
1785:
1784:Barbara (WVS)
1782:
1781:
1780:
1779:
1775:
1771:
1770:Barbara (WVS)
1762:
1750:
1747:
1742:
1740:
1733:
1730:
1729:
1728:
1724:
1720:
1719:Barbara (WVS)
1717:
1716:
1713:
1712:
1711:
1710:
1709:
1708:
1707:
1706:
1703:
1698:
1696:
1690:
1671:
1667:
1663:
1662:Barbara (WVS)
1659:
1656:
1655:
1654:
1651:
1646:
1644:
1638:
1634:
1630:
1626:
1622:
1621:Barbara (WVS)
1617:
1614:
1613:
1612:
1609:
1604:
1602:
1596:
1595:Barbara (WVS)
1593:
1592:
1591:
1590:
1586:
1582:
1581:Barbara (WVS)
1578:
1573:
1566:
1560:
1556:
1552:
1548:
1544:
1539:
1535:
1531:
1527:
1523:
1519:
1515:
1513:
1507:
1506:
1505:
1504:
1502:
1498:
1494:
1493:192.43.227.18
1490:
1484:
1483:
1482:
1481:
1477:
1473:
1469:
1465:
1463:
1451:
1446:
1443:
1439:
1433:
1431:
1430:
1427:
1421:
1418:
1410:
1405:
1403:
1398:
1393:
1388:
1387:
1384:
1380:
1376:
1372:
1369:
1368:
1365:
1361:
1357:
1353:
1350:
1349:
1346:
1342:
1338:
1334:
1331:
1330:
1323:
1320:
1313:
1311:
1305:
1301:
1297:
1293:
1289:
1285:
1284:
1283:
1282:
1281:
1280:
1275:
1271:
1267:
1263:
1262:
1261:
1257:
1253:
1249:
1247:
1242:
1240:
1236:
1232:
1228:
1223:
1219:
1215:
1212:
1205:
1203:
1196:
1195:
1194:
1191:
1185:
1183:
1179:
1176:
1174:
1170:
1166:
1162:
1159:
1157:
1153:
1149:
1145:
1142:
1140:
1136:
1132:
1128:
1125:
1122:
1121:
1118:
1114:
1110:
1106:
1105:
1104:
1103:
1099:
1095:
1087:
1086:
1082:
1078:
1070:
1069:
1065:
1061:
1054:
1051:
1049:
1045:
1041:
1037:
1034:
1032:
1028:
1024:
1020:
1019:Life of Riley
1016:
1013:
1010:
1009:
1008:
1007:
1004:
997:
995:
988:
984:
980:
974:
970:
969:WP:COMMONNAME
966:
962:
957:
956:
952:
948:
944:
937:
935:
930:
925:
920:
919:
914:
912:
911:
907:
903:
894:
892:
891:
887:
883:
877:
874:
872:
869:
868:
864:
862:
861:
857:
853:
849:
840:
839:
835:
831:
825:
823:
816:
814:
811:
807:
803:
799:
795:
789:
786:
783:
778:
777:
774:
770:
767:
763:
762:
757:
756:
752:
746:
744:
743:
739:
735:
728:
725:
724:
723:
722:
718:
714:
707:
704:
703:
702:
701:
697:
693:
686:
683:
682:
681:
679:
672:
670:
669:
665:
661:
655:
653:
649:
645:
644:119.152.52.37
641:
631:
629:
628:
626:
622:
618:
617:202.14.152.15
614:
608:
603:
602:
598:
596:
592:
588:
584:
580:
569:
567:
566:
562:
558:
549:
543:
539:
535:
531:
527:
525:
519:
518:
517:
516:
513:
510:
506:
503:
502:
501:
498:
494:
490:
489:74.138.150.86
486:
475:
471:
468:
464:
463:
458:
457:
453:
452:
451:
450:
447:
439:
435:
432:
428:
424:
423:
422:
419:
416:
409:
398:
397:
393:
392:
385:
378:
365:
357:
356:
350:
349:
346:
343:
339:
338:
329:
328:
323:
322:
317:
314:
313:
308:
307:TRIP database
304:
301:
300:
295:
294:
289:
286:
285:
282:
278:
274:
270:
269:
264:
263:Ideal sources
261:
258:
254:
253:
237:
233:
227:
224:
223:
220:
203:
199:
195:
194:
189:
186:
182:
181:
177:
171:
168:
165:
161:
148:
144:
138:
135:
134:
131:
114:
113:
108:
104:
100:
99:
91:
80:
78:
75:
71:
70:
66:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
2628:
2616:WhatamIdoing
2563:
2544:
2528:
2527:
2518:Traumnovelle
2506:
2486:
2470:
2460:
2425:
2406:
2393:
2377:LaMèreVeille
2355:
2328:
2306:
2303:
2283:
2274:
2271:
2244:
2241:
2219:
2183:
2167:
2159:
2150:
2127:
2102:source check
2081:
2075:
2062:
2058:
2054:
2052:
2017:
2014:
1991:
1966:source check
1945:
1939:
1934:
1930:
1928:
1889:
1886:
1862:
1836:
1797:
1766:
1738:
1694:
1686:
1642:
1600:
1574:
1570:
1547:WP:RECENTISM
1511:
1487:— Preceding
1461:
1457:
1445:
1437:
1414:
1396:
1389:
1370:
1351:
1332:
1309:
1245:
1201:
1177:
1160:
1143:
1131:70.24.250.26
1123:
1091:
1084:
1080:
1076:
1074:
1067:
1063:
1059:
1057:
1055:. How would
1052:
1035:
1014:
1012:Oppose move.
1011:
993:
978:
959:
942:
940:
928:
921:
898:
880:
846:
827:
820:
779:
776:
772:
771:
768:
764:
758:
754:
753:
750:
734:222.67.215.4
731:
713:222.67.215.4
710:
692:222.67.215.4
689:
676:
660:75.144.94.81
656:
635:
609:
604:
600:
599:
573:
553:
550:Epidemiology
523:
479:
460:
454:
446:71.34.36.139
443:
420:
417:
413:
354:
325:
319:
310:
297:
291:
280:
276:
266:
262:
231:
191:
142:
110:
96:
40:WikiProjects
2498:direct move
2490:current log
2461:Please use
2356:This paper
2337:LeadSongDog
2069:Sourcecheck
1402:move review
1165:BarrelProof
934:move review
792:—Preceding
638:—Preceding
632:waqas latif
611:—Preceding
577:—Preceding
476:Stethoscope
421:Christine
2650:Categories
2529:Relisting.
2494:target log
2342:come howl!
2315:Report bug
2160:References
1829:I checked
1567:POV issues
1543:WP:NOTNEWS
1434:Daily Mail
1182:CĂşchullain
1015:Nosocomial
943:page moved
902:Squidonius
766:See also:
462:idiopathic
456:Nosocomial
358:, PLOS One
296:(limit to
2481:directly.
2298:this tool
2291:this tool
2122:this tool
2115:this tool
1986:this tool
1979:this tool
1538:WP:TRIVIA
1512:Doc James
1462:Doc James
1127:WP:JARGON
678:Ambulance
583:Unluraket
524:Doc James
467:MarcoTolo
309:provides
290:provides
2450:succinct
2334:31215326
2304:Cheers.—
2186:TeeVeeed
2128:Cheers.—
2030:cbignore
1992:Cheers.—
1902:cbignore
1683:Resolved
1522:contribs
1489:unsigned
1472:contribs
979:Relisted
882:Bgordski
852:Bgordski
830:Bgordski
806:contribs
794:unsigned
640:unsigned
613:unsigned
591:contribs
579:unsigned
557:Grndrush
534:contribs
485:unsigned
373:|author=
364:citation
118:Medicine
59:Medicine
2629:Comment
2550:ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ
2545:Support
2438:subpage
2352:copyvio
2251:my edit
2138::Online
2055:checked
2024:my edit
2002::Online
1931:checked
1896:my edit
1637:WP:NPOV
1375:Andrewa
1371:Support
1352:Support
1248:article
1227:MOS:MED
1222:MOS:MED
1178:Comment
1161:Support
1124:support
1053:Comment
798:Ocdcntx
785:2770210
234:on the
145:on the
30:C-class
2582:Note:
2487:Links:
2226:(talk)
2201:Jytdog
2063:failed
2038:nobots
1910:nobots
1843:(talk)
1804:(talk)
1792:fomite
1745:(talk)
1701:(talk)
1649:(talk)
1607:(talk)
1551:Jytdog
1541:WP is
1317:(talk)
1286:I see
1266:Apteva
1209:(talk)
1094:Apteva
1001:(talk)
288:PubMed
36:scale.
2469:. Do
2454:civil
1526:email
1476:email
1356:CsDix
1300:14.5k
1220:Does
538:email
440:Usage
2637:talk
2620:talk
2586:and
2522:talk
2473:use
2452:and
2381:talk
2331:PMID
2205:talk
2190:talk
2059:true
1935:true
1873:talk
1821:talk
1774:talk
1723:talk
1666:talk
1625:talk
1585:talk
1577:here
1555:talk
1518:talk
1497:talk
1468:talk
1425:T@lk
1411:Cost
1379:talk
1360:talk
1341:talk
1304:5.5k
1270:talk
1256:talk
1235:talk
1229:. --
1169:talk
1152:talk
1144:Move
1135:talk
1113:talk
1098:talk
1044:talk
987:talk
973:Here
951:talk
906:talk
886:talk
856:talk
834:talk
802:talk
738:talk
717:talk
696:talk
664:talk
648:talk
621:talk
587:talk
561:talk
530:talk
509:Cank
493:talk
384:link
377:help
324:and
305:The
137:High
2614:.
2471:not
2429:bot
2415:to
2411:be
2265:to
2156:"
2096:RfC
2073:).
2061:or
1960:RfC
1922:to
1615:Yes
1549:.
1420:JFW
1394:.
1337:BDD
1296:57k
1292:60k
1288:14k
1252:BDD
1231:BDD
1129:--
1081:HAI
1079:or
1068:HAI
1066:or
983:BDD
782:PMC
431:agr
327:CDC
226:Top
2652::
2639:)
2622:)
2556:)
2526:—
2510:→
2496:•
2492:•
2479:}}
2475:{{
2467:}}
2463:{{
2456:.
2426:A
2383:)
2216:.
2207:)
2192:)
2184:-
2109:.
2104:}}
2100:{{
2071:}}
2067:{{
2036:{{
2032:}}
2028:{{
1973:.
1968:}}
1964:{{
1908:{{
1904:}}
1900:{{
1875:)
1823:)
1776:)
1725:)
1691:.
1668:)
1639:?
1627:)
1587:)
1557:)
1528:)
1524:·
1520:·
1499:)
1478:)
1474:·
1470:·
1422:|
1381:)
1362:)
1343:)
1272:)
1258:)
1237:)
1171:)
1154:)
1137:)
1115:)
1100:)
1075:A
1058:A
1046:)
1029:)
981:.
971:.
963:→
953:)
926:.
908:)
900:--
888:)
858:)
836:)
808:)
804:•
740:)
732:--
719:)
711:--
698:)
690:--
666:)
650:)
623:)
593:)
589:•
563:)
540:)
536:·
532:·
495:)
429:--
410:Hi
368::
366:}}
362:{{
2635:(
2618:(
2554:á´›
2552:(
2520:(
2421:.
2379:(
2317:)
2313:(
2300:.
2293:.
2281:Y
2203:(
2188:(
2175:.
2124:.
2117:.
1988:.
1981:.
1871:(
1819:(
1772:(
1721:(
1664:(
1623:(
1583:(
1553:(
1516:(
1495:(
1466:(
1377:(
1358:(
1339:(
1268:(
1254:(
1233:(
1189:c
1186:/
1167:(
1150:(
1133:(
1111:(
1096:(
1042:(
1027:C
1025:–
1023:T
1021:(
985:(
949:(
904:(
884:(
854:(
832:(
800:(
736:(
715:(
694:(
662:(
646:(
619:(
585:(
559:(
528:(
499:.
491:(
386:)
379:)
375:(
315:.
302:)
283:.
238:.
149:.
115:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
