Talk:Naturism - Knowledge

323: 302: 1702:. I don't have reputable sources, I'm afraid, or I'd cite them. What I have is memories of comments on naturist message boards, years ago, many many comments, where people talked about taking their first steps in naturism by starting to go nude alone at home. My family home was one where, although you would not be welcome to barge into someone else's room when they were in there alone, you could confidently expect them to be clothed if you did. Nudity was solely for when you were actually in the bath. As I say, I don't have sources to show which of these lifestyles is the more common. But there are enough people who don't go nude in private alone that it can't be settled without sources. — 565: 544: 2902: 575: 1517: 670: 649: 2236:

stands, I don't see a reason to remove these pictures. As a consenting adult, if they find problem with their implied nudity on a Knowledge page, they may go through the deletion process which Knowledge provides. However, any picture, in general of a naturist, not necessarily a minor, should not be overt, sexual, or emphasized. Anything to that effect is, in this wiki's definition of naturism, disingenuous of itself and porn (in the case of a minor, child porn).

2651:"More aesthetic" is no more explanatory than "better". If you want to reopen this conversation you need to explain (a) what's more aesthetic about it, and (b) why aesthetics should override the concerns outlined above. Knowledge, being an encyclopaedia rather than a zine or blog site, is not in the business of "compelling visitors to read further"; the purpose of an encyclopaedia is to provide information that readers are already interested in learning. — 775: 754: 516: 913: 235: 2943:

isn't a huge organisational umbrella where everyone fits in with everything. While there are organisations the majority simply feel they just are and don't see naturism as anything special that should be separated and celebrated but just another way of life. For them it's like choosing to wear corduroy pants instead of jeans where it would be nonsensical to brand such people under a particular symbol.

680: 867: 1551:

is often cited in books and articles. The Naturist Society had an enormous influence on the acceptance of clothing-optional beaches in the USA. For decades they published an extremely influential guide on nude beaches and clothing-optional hot spring. Their magazine, Nude & Natural, frequently contains articles by academics and is often used for scholarly research into naturism/nudism.

1355:

the book citations could be moved to the bibliography section (in fact, a couple already were included there). PLEASE NOTE: I have not deleted or removed the references, merely hidden them by commenting them out. I'm sure they will be useful once it can be determined what previous statements they supported. They can be added again by just copying and pasting outside the commented sections.

1294: 271: 1262: 2195:

notice that the child is immersed to the waist in the water; their nudity, as such, is not on display. Additionally, I must point out: part of the distinctive character of naturism, as opposed to some other reasons people might get naked in company, is that it is non-sexual and family-friendly. The best way to illustrate this is with an image of family naturism.

418: 391: 1132:– the current one ('lifestyle that involves nudity') an another, older, meaning ('a certain attitude to life and nature'), which presumably was at the base of the literary movement with the name. Does the source explicitly make the connection between the two, that is, did Saint-Georges de Bouhélier, André Gide et al. really advocate for social nudity? – 1576:, a publication of said organization (and almost certainly a more marginal topic than the org itself). I get 109 results on Google Scholar for "American Sunbathing Association". Also 17 articles in the New York Times archive. Sources are definitely out there. But I have no opposition to creating a "Naturism in the United States" article with 428: 1570:(I haven't looked into the other org). The "written like an advertisement" thing is a completely fixable, temporary problem. As for lack of RS coverage, I just don't believe that there isn't even enough information verifiable in RS to at least constitute a useful stub. I say that in part based on my experience creating the article on 785: 2714:

obscured and in another she has pubic hair. I don't object to any of the pictures but the ones of males are not only more numerous but more front and foremost and contain more men while the number of females are limited and more indirect from the side and back. Men have their legs open while women do not.

2766:

wikipedia and in this article this isn't the case. I'm not saying it's a conscious effort and it's not just about the genitals being visible or not but the chosen images definitely convey the impression that women are more modest in what they show while men aren't which is completely contrary to nudism.

2741:, it's about naturism, which is specifically non-sexual social nudity. What I see is pictures of people undertaking everyday social activities without clothing, without reference to whether or not their genitals are visible. In those conditions penises will be more prominent than vulvas because penises 2942:

My only concern with the image is whether or not it is universally accepted. I can't find any info on how widespread its use is and whether there are objections to it. Just like many nudists don't like the term naturism and there should really be a separate article for it, which there isn't, naturism

2859:

I have just gone through them yet again, and I'm sorry, I cannot see what you're talking about. I mean, I can see some of the photos have been posed for artistic effect, and I can see the guys in the group photos are kind of hamming it up for the camera, but not in a way that emphasizes their penises

2791:

One can, indeed, find on the internet a plethora of photos of naturist women sunbathing with their legs open, taken from a perineal angle. Generally, however, one finds them on voyeur websites and other places that sexualize naturism. I don't believe such images accurately illustrate what naturism is

2761:

While that is the case this isn't just about who's are more visible naturally. A lot of the photos are from the back or side view. Incidentally those photos also feature a lot of women where the front views don't. There's at least two photos featuring 5 men with prominent penises and not just because

2552:

Wow, if that was the original lead image, let it be. That's much better than the FYN picture. Btw, I don't think it will matter if my selection was a posed image. The image that I selected, in my opinion, is more aesthetic than the FYN pic and than that German pic (your selection). I believe that the

2438:

Whilst I don't agree that the FYN photo constitutes "advocacy", I do take the point that it's not as representative of the naturist lifestyle as other photos might be. The people depicted are from a narrow demographic band and it's a posed group photo rather than illustrating naturist activity. And I

2404:

It also mentions numerous efforts to attract younger people and families. Efforts that, like the FYN, often fail. Using this page as part of that effort is wrong. There is no reason to have a defunct, unrepresentative group photo as the lead image of this page. Young people posing in a group does not

2210:

justify any presumption about the occurrence of child abuse within naturist contexts. Again as an analogy for clarification: breastfeeding has unfortunately become sexualized in some Western societies in the last decade or two, but it would be absurd to consider breastfeeding an exemplar of child sex

2080:

Because I'm pretty sure we can agree that it would be wrong to describe churches as "a place of perversion and child abuse", despite the many documented cases of child abusers using church positions as a mask of virtue. Thus, even if one were able to document cases when naturist communities have been

1993:

Read the NOTCENSORED page, it says illegal stuff shouldn't be on Knowledge. It isn't censored, but doesn't allow for something illegal which child pornography plainly is. The page itself notes that some nudist colonies allow sex, therefore we should be cautious about the sexualization of children and

2824:

I know what you're saying that these portray people in a natural setting but I don't agree. #15 is not the way people normally pose and neither is #6. You don't have to analyse the images for these 3 to stick out as overly gratuitous compared to the female images. So either the selection resulted in

2717:

This might be consciously or subconsciously done and the images chosen for aesthetic reasons but it gives the impression that women somehow have their modesty protected which is contrary to the idea of nudism/naturism. All of the activities and positions men are found in women would also be found in

2381:

I strongly disagree. The current photo illustrate naturism very well : a group of casually naked people. I don't see a need to replace it, and the picture you propose show them in the distance, all from behind, as if it was trying to hide their nakedness. Naturism isn't restricted to old people, and

2264:

I appreciate the work that has been going into this page, it is becoming a good resource. I would like to suggest, though, that it is missing a lens of modern intersections, and that those are critical to keeping naturism alive. Issues like #freethenipple, body acceptance, feminism, LGBTQ+, and more

2239:

The controversy section should also link to "Issues in social nudity" page. For a NPOV, this issue is one that non-naturists will generally think of, and should be forefront, for both their disillusionment and their understanding that an overwhelming majority of naturists don't diddle children, just

1241:

I agree the article needs some photographs of 50+ people of both sexes to accurately represent naturism. This would also distance it from the nudism as porn school of thought . Naturism is more about body acceptance and body positivity than it is about voyeuristic gazing at young attractive people.

2886:

I have moved this image to the head of the article where its a more fitting accompaniment to the lede than a photo of bathers which has dropped down a few inches. It emphasises that this is a movement and an idea . Its a flag for an for an international movement. Just about every social movement

2396:

There are two French sources saying there are young people doing nudism, but other sources that nudist communities are actively trying to recruit young people because they are aging communities. It is very common for permanent nudist communities to be at least half retirement community. And when it

2231:

Child Abuse in FKK and Naturist settings is listed as one of the issues in social nudity. From a documentation standpoint, it is irrational to say that there are no child naturists, or that naturism isn't for kids, but children do not make up a large portion of the naturist culture (the avg. age is

2019:

Your personal politics are getting in the way of this. I'm well aware nudist groups spend a lot of money advocating for nudism as a panacea for all of life's problems, but Knowledge isn't your soapbox. You are the one edit warring, and you've also been harassing me on my talk page. You need to step

1914:

The US has common law. That means judicial precedent is law. Numerous courts have found nudist activity being used for cover of indecent materials. Numerous states have banned some or all nudist camps. Having a naked child between two naked adults is at least in a legal grey area, so it makes sense

1861:

All "true" naturists? The NOTCENSORED policy says things can't break US law. Courts have found nudist publications to often be used as workarounds for obscenity laws. Putting a child between two naked people is obviously sexual. It is against NPOV for "naturist" advocates to use a Knowledge page to

1550:

It does not make sense to merge two independent organizations into a general topic. Many naturists (or nudists) do not agree that these organizations represent them. They certainly don't control the movement. Yet they are both significant. AANR has been in existence since the early 20th century and

1354:

I've gone through the list of monograph, and partly through the journal, references and hidden to ones that are no longer tied to anything in the article text. Since none of these supported anything in the article, it seemed superfluous to have them listed in the References section. Perhaps some of

1321:

photo recently added to the page, which is not appropriate. There is an issue with some editors adding photos of young women; there is also an issue with (male) editors adding photos of themselves, with not-so-subtle emphasis on genitalia – to the extent that Knowledge actually has a specific user

1176:

I feel like most images of this article are misleading because statistics show that most people practicing naturism are people older than 50, and are especially men, and a lot of images here show young women practicing naturism, which is the category of people the least representative of naturists.

2783:

I'm sorry, but the images here don't convey any such impression to me. I've gone through them twice now. There are maybe three where people are posing for the camera rather than going about their business; one is of some men, the others are of mixed groups. They're posing, but they don't give (me)

2347:

The picture of Florida Young Naturists is inappropriate for two reasons. The FYN no longer exists, and it isn't representative of the culture. Seniors are the majority, and even at the family-oriented places there are few people in their 20's. Teens tend to wear clothes when given the option. This

2235:

The concern of the abuse of children is valid from a non-naturist perspective. However, this controversy is mentioned multiple times throughout the article (in Controversy and Media), and there are only two (as far as I know) of children, both of which with their privates obscured from view. As it

2987:

The symbol has been released into the creative commons for anyone to use without charge. It is not the property or design of any naturist organisation but was the result of a global competition and consultation including anyone who identified as naturist. There are no competing symbols . So its

2926:

for naturism as it just a logo. This is an encyclopaedia article not a promotional piece for naturism. We are here to describe naturism as we would any social movement. We should fit in with the norm for any social movement on the project. I repeat - Just about every social movement described on

2841:

If your argument is that the men are posed in typical fashion then it begs the question why NONE of the women are. If it would be considered gratuitous for the women to be then it must be asked why it isn't for the men. If you see this as balanced in some construed way you wouldn't have a problem

1932:

Further, even the nudist colonies that allow children generally don't let anyone photograph the children besides the parents. Are those the child's parents? Many nudist colonies give discounts to people who bring children, so it could be someone other than the parents. We don't know if that child

1659:

I was attempting to define the topic based upon the only cited source. All the organizations and all the literature talk about naturism and nudism as a social practice, and none of the current content refers to anything else. It goes without saying that a social nudist is also naked at home, and

1529:

At this point, my thinking is that, although they are minor articles, we keep the AANR and TNS articles as they are (and make an infobox for TNS), as they do serve a larger purpose. I say this because if we combine and consolidate, the AANR infobox will likely just need to be removed, or if kept,

1274:

Showing some photos of young naturists among others isn't portraying naturism as "voyeuristic gazing at young attractive people". Nor would adding more photos of old people suddenly make it some voyeurism for gerontophiles. One of the point of naturism is distancing the naked body from being only

965:

I think the editor involved was simply confused, and accidentally edited an old version of the page instead of the current one. I did that a few times when I was newer to Knowledge than I am now. I don't think I removed quite this much material, though – really, the entire Naturism in New Zealand

2748:

Speaking from my own experience of social nudity, most of the time you don't see people's vulvas just because from most natural viewing angles they're out of sight underneath the person's body or between their legs – not to mention the fact that in naturist settings you mostly look people in the

2400:

The picture you prefer is of the Florida Young Naturists, a group that was founded to encourage young people to try nudism. They shut their doors several years ago exactly because it isn't popular with young people. Maybe they go to nude beaches sometimes, but "nude recreation" is mostly for the

2194:

A black-and-white photo from 1983 is at least more appropriate for the History section than a recent photo. Since this image is from 1983, that child is at least as old as I am. They are now an adult and fully capable of objecting to the use of the image should they wish to do so. You might also

1630:

I know it's surprising, but that is not the case. Far more people than you would think keep their clothes on even when they're alone at home, and wear pyjamas to bed. "At-home naturism" is a real thing; often a precursor to social naturism. With respect, I think those particular edits should be

2765:

I'm not saying that nudist/naturists women are inclined to keep their legs mostly closed where I know for a fact they don't. To put the theory of natural visibility to rest here off wikipedia you can find a multitude of images of women with open legs where the vulvas are clearly visible but on

2713:

A lot of the pictures used do not show the genitals of females while the genitals of males appear more prominently. I can only see two where the genitals of the women are clearly visible and one looks more like a model on a mostly clothed beach that's rather out of place. Another it's slightly

1963:

There are procedures for objecting to photographs being inappropriately used without the subject's consent in Wikimedia Commons. A quick read through this page's editing history will reveal that this happened fairly recently with regard to an image illustrating Spanish naturism. If you believe

2828:

Wrt to the voyeur sites true voyeur sites would be unposed and thus portray women in a natural setting. They don't further your argument but the opposite. Indeed it is also my experience that women would regularly be found to sunbath with legs open but none of the images here show that. Again

2422:

We use it as a photo showing a group of naturists. Trying to take it down because of an alleged sociological discrepancy to replace it with a photo not showing what the page is about make no sense. On the Swimming page, would you be taking down a picture of black swimmers because the sport is

3008:

That does not make it universally accepted. It would need to be used by just about everyone and every organisation without major objection. I can't find that it is and is more optional with every organisation still using their own logo as well. As for Twitter that can't be regarded as being

2795:

In my country most naturist resorts are clothes-optional, and by observation it tends to be women rather than men who go around in sarongs and T-shirts. Why this should be, I don't have the data to speculate, but I can report it as a fact. I have seen an argument made (in one naturist club

3009:

representative of every naturist just as it's not regarded as representative of anyone in general so it can't be claimed to have had global consultation. Most naturists probably didn't even know about the process going on at the time. Its acceptance would depend on its use in the future.

2299:

sections. I'm not familiar with the breadth of either feminism or LGBTQ+ coverage on Knowledge, so I don't know if there are existing articles that could be looped in, or if new sections would need to be written from scratch, but either way, if you're interested, by all means, please

1501:

I was going to suggest that we go with @VeryRarelyStable 's idea of consolidating most of the info into a separate Naturism in the US article, but today the WikiMedia Foundation published new info about something called WikiMedia Enterprise. While perusing the article, I came across

2784:

the impression of having been especially arranged to either hide or display their genitals. If you've gone through and counted carefully, I don't disbelieve you, but it's the sort of thing that you would have to go through and count carefully, not the sort of thing that leaps out.

1426:

has been tagged as reading like and advertisement; both as a result of there being few reliable sources. As with many membership organizations, there is little published about them by anyone outside, leading to the appearance, if not the fact of not being notable or not having a

1644:

I agree. There are many naturists who prefer nudity whenever it's convenient, not just at the beach or club. There are many naturists who have little or no opportunity for social naturism. In fact, I'd go as far as to say that being naked only with others borders on exhibition.

2808:

Images #1 & #2 is fairly representative as an impromptu photo so can be left out. Once we get to #3 it's where things change. We can still consider this a fluke though that the male is in a more gratuitous pose in the moment if it wasn't for the other photos. It's at

2155:

But the original matter was the naked child featured on the page. It's a picture that doesn't connect with anything in the body and is therefore unnecessary. There are plenty of other pictures of naked people to choose from that don't potentially harm an unknown child.

2736:

Having skimmed down the photos in the article, any bias towards males is not particularly apparent to my eye. Nor is it apparent to me that any conscious effort has been taken to either show or hide the subjects' genitals. After all, this article is not about nudity

2351:

I suggest using instead the FKK image from the Germany section. It is a good representation of nude recreation. Also, while there is nothing in the rules against having full frontal nudity in the article, it might be advisable to avoid it, at least at the top of the

2382:

we've got sources on the page about it being more and more younger nowadays. Young people not being there is very far from the norm. Knowledge isn't censored, and the naked people aren't show in a sexual way at all. They're not top models either. It's not sexual.--

322: 301: 3038:

was placed without consideration that the article was created to reduce the size of this article. However, the article has continued to grow, and I see no obvious remedy. Perhaps there is too much said about each country, only a few having their own articles.

2265:

are very relevant to naturism. I would like to discuss either a section or a new article on these. This is not to say that every person who is a naturist has a uniform view on them but to highlight the relevance and interrelatedness of some of the key items.

2092:, and found that it clearly stated that Caliente introduced an age limit when they switched from being a family naturist resort to being a swingers' resort. Which means there is no cited evidence on the table for child abuse occurring at naturist resorts. 2787:

I don't see the point of your reference to pubic hair, as pubic hair is just as forbidden in mainstream society and just as acceptable in naturist society as genitals themselves, and thus illustrates the distinction between the two just as

2833:

shows the men in a more natural setting while one I presume to be a woman is completely obscured, another is wearing a bottom, two are laying on their front with one of them shown from the back. That is not typical of a nudist scene.

2104:

The pages for churches do include examples of child abuse, despite it being only a small minority. Examples include the Catholic Church and Jevhovah's Witnesses, both mention child abuse scandals in the lead, and several times in the

1473:. Then update that article and the "United States" section of this one as necessary to ensure accurate mutual consistency. That way there's room for detailed information in the separate article, and this article doesn't get too big. — 2973:", "Naturist club", "Naturist camp", "Naturist community" and "Nudist colony", because even though some people are quite adamant about the fine distinctions between them, they essentially describe variations of the same phenomenon. 2327:

Re the reversion of a previous reversion done in my name. I'm more than a little confused. I don't remember making that edit! I can only think that I inadvertently undid the wrong edit and I hope my account has not been hacked.

2401:

older crowd and to a lesser degree families. If you've been active in nude recreation you should already know this, but if not read the History section which repeatedly mentions declining youth participation in the recent era.

1756: 2531:

That's the old lede image we had before the FYN one. It has the same main problem noted with the FYN picture, namely, it's a posed photo which doesn't illustrate naturist activity. It would be just fine as a lede image for

1225:

There are a few photos showing young women and there are a few young women who practice naturism. The photos do have a bias towards the young but that's because young people are more likely to allow being photographed.

1316:

I think the tea photo is perfectly suitable for this article. The "aging male naturist" photo is borderline; I think it needs a different caption, perhaps something like "Home naturism". I will shortly remove the

1524:). So, I'm thinking that the uses of Knowledge data by the larger world (where many people just look something up on Google or DDG and call it good without ever coming to Knowledge) might be something to consider. 2842:

with the images being replaced by women in similar positions and I'll be searching flickr. If you consider that "sexualising naturism" then you need to explain why the same isn't true for the 3 images of men.

153: 3110: 2965:

this time, at least on the symbol. It's a very new symbol and I gather it was chosen by Twitter poll. Let's first check and see if the INF or any other naturist organization is actually officially using

1530:

won't be at the top of the article but buried down inside (and then should we make another infobox for TNS in the same article?). Not sure how search engines would utilize the info if such were the case.

2988:

free to use and has the broadest possible backing across the worlds naturists. It should be used to identify naturism and naturists wherever it is found . There is an explanation of its creation here.

2818: 2796:

newsletter) that this is contrary to naturist philosophy and should be banned; I have also seen the response that argument got from dozens of members of the club in question, and it wasn't supportive.

2232:

around 50 or so). As far as I know, the nudity of children is not censored anywhere else on Knowledge (Napalm Girl, for example, one of the most famous pictures of the Vietnam War, is on Knowledge).

2451: 373: 3115: 1778:

I know that nudists like to pretend that it is non-sexual, but they are wrong. Nudist colonies have long been a place of perversion and child abuse. No image of a child should be on this page.

1128:

was recently introduced. It may or may not be accurate here, but the whole passage leaves me with the uneasy feeling that there may – possibly! – be a mixing up of two meanings of the word

3105: 2408:

The picture I put forth, of a range of people relaxing on the beach, is much more representative. People bathing nude is a hallmark of nudism. Knowledge is for information, not advocacy.

1843:

The photo in question is not sexual in any way; and as for the comment about "nudist colonies" (what are they?), it is totally untrue and a gross insult to all true naturists/nudists. --

3125: 631: 621: 1069: 1065: 523: 401: 3130: 1608:

I had never paid much attention to this article, but decided to do a little cleanup. I immediately found content that was unsupported, or contradictory to the sources cited.

2517:

I chose a better lead picture. I also rearranged some pics in the process, taking care to delete none. Please don't roll back. If you have any objections, reply to me first.

2423:

majority white, or replace it with people walking in the water in the distance? Of course not. The photo has been on the page since years because it illustrate naturism well.

1749: 1660:

perhaps there is a place for content about those who are unconcerned with nudity among family and friends; but totally private nudity is what everyone does, unless they are

1029:

Seeing no objection, I have made the changes I suggested above. I have also removed some unsourced and unreliably sourced material. The article is now under 100,000 bytes.

2536:

but I believe the one above is better for this page. If you're going to ask people not to revert you, at minimum you should at least give some kind of explanation as to

597: 1469:

create a "Naturism in the United States" article (such as exists for New Zealand, France, Germany, and a few others), and merge the organization-specific articles into

3120: 449:

on Knowledge. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the

2860:

unduly. (We do get that kind of photo put up here from time to time, believe me.) I'd appreciate input from other readers so it's not just my opinion against yours .

1893:

Photographs of people, including children, without clothes on, are not illegal in US law. You are not the arbiter of what is "obviously sexual" or "common sense". —

2927:

Knowledge , whether its political, cultural , religious or anything else starts off the article with its emblem somewhere at the top of the page. Anyone agree?

2048:

I am sure the number of child abusers who have used naturist communities as cover is not zero, but neither is the number of child abusers who have used churches. —

147: 2439:

don't think it's been there all that long; the lede photo used to be a beach photo from Haulover, I think it was, and it was changed maybe two or three years ago.

2887:

described on Knowledge , whether its political, cultural , religious or anything else starts off the article with its emblem somewhere at the top of the page.

3090: 2835: 1933:(now an adult) wants their naked picture associated with a controversial topic like nudism. So again, benefit of the doubt goes to no children on a nudist page. 363: 2553:

aesthetic appeal of the pic of my selection will compel visitors to read further. However, I also gave your German pic a second position. It looks good there.

2969:

I don't agree, however, that we need separate pages for "Naturism" and "Nudism". The content would be virtually identical. We don't have separate pages for "

588: 549: 3100: 2612:

Any future change is extremely unlikely to be the image you are trying to revert to, as it was agreed that that image was "posed", so was inappropriate. -

486: 476: 3140: 736: 726: 79: 2450: 1793: 2130:

I'm not suggesting it needs to be front and center, but it also shouldn't be covered up. This isn't an advertisement or advocacy for nudist colonies.

3080: 1567: 1423: 3150: 845: 835: 339: 3085: 2198:

If there are concrete examples, with sources, of child abuse scandals attaching to particular naturist groups, and in particular if there is a

891: 2814: 2057:(Since the relevance of this remark has been queried: I was under the impression that there was an accusation of child abuse on the table.) — 1159: 451: 85: 2762:

they are naturally but because of the pose. No women are found here in those poses. You can look that up and verify if you don't believe me.

2630:

In that case let the consensus seek a different image from Wikimedia Commons. I do NOT consider the agreed image as having aesthetic value.

2020:

back and realize your lifestyle ideas aren't universal. Get a towel and have a nice sit and ask yourself why you are so consumed with this.

3155: 3095: 702: 3135: 2825:

the impression that men are more gratuitous compared to women or it is that women are more modest which from my experience they aren't.

3160: 875: 330: 307: 3059: 2397:

isn't elderly people, it is usually families. There are rarely groups of young people. Again, sources point to that being the trend.

1516:

That got me thinking about search results on Google and DuckDuckGo, both of which feature Infoboxes prominently (examples for AANR:

811: 3145: 441: 396: 251:

to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to

44: 2686:

I likewise hope that my inputs on this talk page will prove helpful for the others seeking to improve the content in the future.

974:

quite a lot of the stuff you had removed, which I think you may have thought was what I was doing when I reverted the change. —

693: 654: 241: 99: 30: 1125: 1871:

It's also just common sense. Children don't belong on this page. Put all the old naked weirdos you want on it, but not kids.

1193:

Valid point. If you can upload images to commons and offer links on talk page so that possible changes are discussed first.

104: 20: 2718:

and it seems unnatural that so many would hide or obscure their genitals in some way so some bias seems to be at play here.

3016: 2950: 2849: 2773: 2725: 2413: 2371: 2357: 2161: 2071: 2025: 1938: 1876: 1789: 1599:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

256: 74: 2081:

similarly used, it does not follow that naturist communities are by their nature "a place of perversion and child abuse".

2810: 2348:

page suffers from a desire to "sell" naturism to the normies, when it should be an informative article about a culture.

2304: 1764: 798: 759: 282: 252: 248: 168: 2446:? It shows naturist activity rather than people posing, and there's a a bit more diversity among the people depicted. 1556: 65: 2202:

of such scandals, then of course that would be appropriate material for the page. But I'm going to reiterate: that's

135: 979: 185: 1099: 887: 2901: 1419: 946: 215: 3044: 2487: 1669: 1620: 1490: 1451: 1432: 1199: 1120:, the idea of reveling freely in physical sensations and direct experiences and a spontaneous approach to life. 2500: 2409: 2367: 2353: 2157: 2067: 2021: 1934: 1872: 1785: 2609:

the lead image was agreed by consensus, so should remain unless another consensus is reached in the future.

1745:

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

1184: 3035: 2694: 2635: 2578: 2561: 2522: 2333: 2296: 1848: 1760: 1650: 1552: 1443: 1400: 1340: 1306: 1231: 937: 933: 929: 925: 921: 866: 206: 202: 198: 194: 190: 109: 2280:

Thank you for these suggestions. They're all good, and I agree, would serve the development of the article.

2270: 234: 1721: 1485:- That would also be a merge, of the two smaller articles into the larger (AANR) which would be renamed.-- 580: 129: 3062:

which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —

1503: 2977: 2864: 2800: 2753: 2680: 2672: 2652: 2570: 2549: 2541: 2514: 2506: 2459: 2215: 2096: 2058: 2049: 1965: 1894: 1813: 1805: 1703: 1632: 1474: 1326: 1180: 975: 288: 2266: 1964:

Knowledge is in breach of the law, you are at liberty to report them to the appropriate authorities. —

1781: 1572: 125: 2366:

I made the change and replaced the German pic with another one from the Naturism in Germany article.

574: 564: 543: 270: 3040: 2482: 2312: 1690:"but totally private nudity is what everyone does" – no, it isn't. Totally private nudity is what 1665: 1616: 1540: 1486: 1447: 1428: 1360: 1194: 1077: 1072:

respectively. Editors interested in this article are invited to comment in the linked discussions.

879: 161: 55: 810:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

701:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

596:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

338:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

2690: 2662: 2646: 2631: 2606: 2574: 2557: 2518: 2329: 1844: 1822: 1646: 1396: 1336: 1302: 1227: 951: 883: 220: 70: 2472: 2387: 1280: 1215: 175: 2556:

I have some experience with nude aesthetics. So I made those changes based on that experience.

3013: 2947: 2846: 2770: 2722: 2617: 1830: 1712: 1585: 1133: 1049: 1034: 1019: 669: 648: 433: 51: 2999: 2932: 2912: 2892: 1247: 994: 948: 912: 217: 2970: 2830: 2442:

Might I suggest, if there is a will to change the lede image, the current lede photo from

2284: 2245: 2089: 593: 2303:

And if this is a subject area of interest to you, I'd invite you to consider joining our

1615:

is defined as social, not individual nudity, else everyone would be a nudist/naturist. --

2308: 1809: 1536: 1356: 1073: 685: 774: 753: 515: 141: 3074: 3063: 2468: 2383: 1741:

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

1521: 1418:

as a new subsection on organizations as a means of resolving ongoing content issues.

1276: 1211: 1116: 1107: 1103: 790: 2573:

Please restore my changes. I have now made a clear statement explaining my changes.

3010: 2962: 2944: 2843: 2767: 2719: 2627: 2613: 1826: 1581: 1577: 1057: 1030: 1015: 967: 335: 1261: 2995: 2928: 2908: 2888: 1661: 1395:. There is consensus for article creation and improvement, but not for a merge. 1243: 2989: 1293: 2671:

dictate what the consensus does. That's the opposite of what a consensus is. —

2292: 2288: 2241: 1053: 780: 679: 675: 570: 446: 423: 2992:. We should use it alongside the lede with an explanation if one is needed. 2206:. The fact that many non-naturists have sexual feelings about naturism does 698: 1415: 807: 24: 1414:

Two articles on naturist organizations could be merged into the section

1111: 1066:

Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 2#Clothing optional

445:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to 2838:

is more typical of the way men are shown but again only from the back.

2295:- the redirect for Body acceptance), so they could be looped in using 2533: 2443: 1422:

was moved to DRAFT: space after being pared down to stub length, and

1061: 803: 950: 417: 390: 219: 2900: 1511:

The ‘infoboxes’ or knowledge graphs shown in search engine results

1292: 1260: 1210:

It seem to me the page already is predominantly portraying men. --

1106:) that also influenced the art movements of the time specifically 1070:

Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 2#Clothes free

1446:, a stub about a defunct organization, to the merge candidates.-- 1259:

I have added this photo of a mature naturist couple making tea.

3066: 3048: 3021: 3003: 2980: 2955: 2936: 2916: 2896: 2867: 2854: 2803: 2778: 2756: 2730: 2698: 2675: 2655: 2639: 2621: 2582: 2565: 2544: 2526: 2509: 2493: 2476: 2462: 2417: 2391: 2375: 2361: 2337: 2316: 2274: 2249: 2218: 2165: 2099: 2075: 2061: 2052: 2029: 1968: 1942: 1897: 1880: 1852: 1834: 1816: 1797: 1768: 1726: 1706: 1673: 1654: 1635: 1624: 1589: 1580:

summaries of AANR and other noteworthy naturism organizations.

1560: 1544: 1494: 1477: 1455: 1436: 1404: 1364: 1344: 1329: 1310: 1284: 1275:

shown for eroticism, so I find the comment very uncalled for.--

1251: 1235: 1219: 1205: 1188: 1136: 1081: 1038: 1023: 983: 952: 906: 861: 264: 229: 221: 15: 2066:

Why did you mention churches? I took it as a personal attack.

890:

of this article to be created. For further information, see

514: 1114:

painters. This movement was based on the French concept of

2683:

Noted. I express my utmost gratitude for your tutorial on.

899:

The rationale behind the request is: "important subject".

2240:

like an overwhelming majority of the regular population.

2922:

It has now been reverted with the comment that its not

3111:

Low-importance social and political philosophy articles

1158:

sfn error: no target: CITEREFHarrison_&_Perry1993 (

1092: 1265:

A posed illustration of a naturist couple making tea.

160: 2540:

your selection constitutes a "better lead picture". —

1384:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

1153: 802:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 697:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 592:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 334:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 3116:

Social and political philosophy task force articles

497: 2283:There are pages for some of these topics already ( 1804:As well as being false, this is in breach of both 970:, you may not have noticed, but they actually put 2088:article which was your citation both here and on 3106:C-Class social and political philosophy articles 2084:However, I wrote that comment before I read the 1750:Nudist-Textile couple in Cabo de Gata, Spain.jpg 993:The article, at 113,161 bytes, is too long (see 255:regarding potentially objectionable content and 247:Images or details contained within this article 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 1915:to keep it off the page. What good is it doing? 1509: 3126:Mid-importance Sexology and sexuality articles 1755:Participate in the deletion discussion at the 1350:Hiding unused monograph and journal references 1611:I edited the opening section to reflect that 1387:A summary of the conclusions reached follows. 1096: 1004:Remove the "Issues in social nudity" section; 174: 8: 2990:https://www.naturistsymbol.org/more/history/ 606:Knowledge:WikiProject Sexology and sexuality 3131:WikiProject Sexology and sexuality articles 3034:The tag which proposed merging the article 1172:Images are not representatives of naturists 609:Template:WikiProject Sexology and sexuality 3058:There is a move discussion in progress on 2813:that things go awry and repeated again at 1045:Related redirects nominated for discussion 748: 643: 538: 494: 385: 296: 249:may be graphic or otherwise objectionable 1568:American Association for Nude Recreation 1424:American Association for Nude Recreation 1064:) have been nominated for discussion at 3121:C-Class Sexology and sexuality articles 1146: 1102:in the late 1800s (see the writings of 750: 645: 540: 387: 298: 268: 2505:Any comments on this new suggestion? — 1007:Condense the "Philosophy" section; and 455:about philosophy content on Knowledge. 1297:A typical aging male naturist at home 7: 3091:Low-importance Anthropology articles 1378:The following discussion is closed. 796:This article is within the scope of 691:This article is within the scope of 586:This article is within the scope of 439:This article is within the scope of 328:This article is within the scope of 1126:fr:Naturisme (mouvement littéraire) 1091:The current version of the article 287:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 3101:Low-importance Philosophy articles 1391:The result of this discussion was 1001:Remove the "Demographics" section; 589:WikiProject Sexology and sexuality 348:Knowledge:WikiProject Anthropology 14: 3141:Low-importance sociology articles 3060:Talk:Female toplessness in Canada 2749:face. I don't see a problem here. 1322:warning template for the purpose. 351:Template:WikiProject Anthropology 2449: 2260:Modern intersections of naturism 1595:The discussion above is closed. 1335:OK, I've changed the caption. -- 911: 865: 783: 773: 752: 678: 668: 647: 573: 563: 542: 461:Knowledge:WikiProject Philosophy 426: 416: 389: 321: 300: 269: 233: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 3081:Knowledge objectionable content 2821:is another non standard stance. 2467:Yeah, I agree with that one. -- 840:This article has been rated as 731:This article has been rated as 711:Knowledge:WikiProject Sociology 626:This article has been rated as 612:Sexology and sexuality articles 524:Social and political philosophy 481:This article has been rated as 464:Template:WikiProject Philosophy 368:This article has been rated as 257:options for not seeing an image 3151:Top-importance nudity articles 2699:15:07, 13 September 2022 (UTC) 2676:12:42, 13 September 2022 (UTC) 2656:12:41, 13 September 2022 (UTC) 2640:12:36, 13 September 2022 (UTC) 2622:12:32, 13 September 2022 (UTC) 2583:12:06, 13 September 2022 (UTC) 2566:12:02, 13 September 2022 (UTC) 2545:11:50, 13 September 2022 (UTC) 2527:09:33, 13 September 2022 (UTC) 2204:concrete examples with sources 714:Template:WikiProject Sociology 253:Knowledge's content disclaimer 1: 3086:C-Class Anthropology articles 3067:22:18, 21 December 2023 (UTC) 2882:International Naturist Symbol 2510:08:18, 3 September 2022 (UTC) 2494:07:08, 2 September 2022 (UTC) 2477:06:26, 2 September 2022 (UTC) 2463:05:38, 2 September 2022 (UTC) 1311:11:28, 29 December 2020 (UTC) 1285:11:32, 29 December 2020 (UTC) 1252:10:48, 29 December 2020 (UTC) 1236:09:51, 29 December 2020 (UTC) 1220:01:57, 29 December 2020 (UTC) 1206:23:42, 28 December 2020 (UTC) 1189:22:41, 28 December 2020 (UTC) 1094:has the following paragraph: 814:and see a list of open tasks. 705:and see a list of open tasks. 600:and see a list of open tasks. 342:and see a list of open tasks. 42:Put new text under old text. 3049:15:39, 30 October 2023 (UTC) 2317:05:19, 8 February 2022 (UTC) 2275:16:09, 6 February 2022 (UTC) 2219:07:12, 18 October 2021 (UTC) 2166:06:23, 18 October 2021 (UTC) 2100:23:49, 12 October 2021 (UTC) 2076:12:36, 12 October 2021 (UTC) 2062:00:24, 11 October 2021 (UTC) 2030:10:30, 10 October 2021 (UTC) 1969:09:55, 10 October 2021 (UTC) 1943:09:36, 10 October 2021 (UTC) 1898:06:53, 10 October 2021 (UTC) 1881:03:11, 10 October 2021 (UTC) 1862:promote their point of view. 1137:00:32, 10 October 2020 (UTC) 1039:06:28, 4 February 2020 (UTC) 1024:04:37, 23 January 2020 (UTC) 997:). I propose the following: 984:10:47, 21 January 2020 (UTC) 893:WikiProject Spoken Knowledge 820:Knowledge:WikiProject Nudity 3156:WikiProject Nudity articles 3096:C-Class Philosophy articles 3054:Move discussion in progress 2745:more prominent than vulvas. 2481:agreed a much better image. 2418:16:18, 19 August 2022 (UTC) 2392:19:21, 18 August 2022 (UTC) 2053:10:02, 8 October 2021 (UTC) 1853:09:56, 8 October 2021 (UTC) 1835:09:25, 8 October 2021 (UTC) 1817:09:22, 8 October 2021 (UTC) 1798:07:34, 8 October 2021 (UTC) 1370:Proposed merge into section 1345:10:02, 3 January 2021 (UTC) 1330:04:09, 3 January 2021 (UTC) 1082:09:32, 2 October 2020 (UTC) 823:Template:WikiProject Nudity 50:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 3177: 3136:C-Class sociology articles 3022:22:50, 27 April 2023 (UTC) 3004:22:29, 27 April 2023 (UTC) 2981:22:04, 27 April 2023 (UTC) 2956:17:47, 27 April 2023 (UTC) 2937:16:31, 27 April 2023 (UTC) 2917:13:58, 27 April 2023 (UTC) 2897:13:58, 27 April 2023 (UTC) 2868:12:02, 27 April 2023 (UTC) 2855:11:02, 27 April 2023 (UTC) 2804:03:35, 27 April 2023 (UTC) 2779:02:58, 27 April 2023 (UTC) 2757:23:46, 26 April 2023 (UTC) 2731:13:15, 26 April 2023 (UTC) 1994:remove images of children. 1727:19:02, 14 March 2021 (UTC) 1707:10:07, 14 March 2021 (UTC) 1674:01:05, 14 March 2021 (UTC) 1545:18:02, 17 March 2021 (UTC) 1495:00:25, 14 March 2021 (UTC) 846:project's importance scale 737:project's importance scale 632:project's importance scale 487:project's importance scale 3161:Spoken Knowledge requests 2376:03:23, 28 July 2022 (UTC) 2338:13:11, 18 June 2022 (UTC) 2250:08:53, 3 April 2022 (UTC) 1694:people do, possibly even 1655:08:19, 9 March 2021 (UTC) 1636:23:00, 8 March 2021 (UTC) 1625:21:15, 8 March 2021 (UTC) 1590:21:57, 28 June 2021 (UTC) 1478:22:00, 8 March 2021 (UTC) 1456:18:49, 8 March 2021 (UTC) 1437:15:29, 8 March 2021 (UTC) 1405:19:46, 30 June 2022 (UTC) 1365:01:22, 2 March 2021 (UTC) 1154:Harrison & Perry 1993 966:section? Most tellingly, 909: 839: 768: 730: 663: 625: 558: 522: 493: 480: 411: 367: 316: 295: 242:Knowledge is not censored 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 2362:09:09, 3 July 2022 (UTC) 1769:11:38, 9 July 2021 (UTC) 1597:Please do not modify it. 1381:Please do not modify it. 331:WikiProject Anthropology 3146:C-Class nudity articles 3036:Issues in social nudity 1561:15:59, 1 May 2021 (UTC) 1444:Young Naturists America 1010:Condense the footnotes. 498:Associated task forces: 2905: 1513: 1416:Naturism#United_States 1298: 1266: 1122: 603:Sexology and sexuality 581:Human sexuality portal 550:Sexology and sexuality 519: 442:WikiProject Philosophy 277:This article is rated 75:avoid personal attacks 2904: 1573:Sunshine & Health 1296: 1264: 1098:Naturism was part of 1087:The literary movement 961:Deletions, 21 January 694:WikiProject Sociology 518: 354:Anthropology articles 100:Neutral point of view 1420:The Naturist Society 1290:How about this one? 402:Social and political 105:No original research 2501:FrankForAllAndBirds 2410:FrankForAllAndBirds 2368:FrankForAllAndBirds 2354:FrankForAllAndBirds 2158:FrankForAllAndBirds 2068:FrankForAllAndBirds 2022:FrankForAllAndBirds 1935:FrankForAllAndBirds 1873:FrankForAllAndBirds 1786:FrankForAllAndBirds 1535:What do you think? 1100:a literary movement 467:Philosophy articles 2906: 1774:No children, ever. 1761:Community Tech bot 1299: 1267: 1124:Now, the link to 799:WikiProject Nudity 717:sociology articles 520: 452:general discussion 283:content assessment 86:dispute resolution 47: 3019: 2953: 2852: 2776: 2728: 2681:@VeryRarelyStable 2571:@VeryRarelyStable 2550:@VeryRarelyStable 2515:@VeryRarelyStable 2492: 2405:represent Nudism. 1784:comment added by 1718: 1566:I oppose merging 1504:this bullet point 1204: 1050:Clothing optional 958: 957: 905: 904: 860: 859: 856: 855: 852: 851: 747: 746: 743: 742: 642: 641: 638: 637: 537: 536: 533: 532: 529: 528: 434:Philosophy portal 384: 383: 380: 379: 263: 262: 228: 227: 66:Assume good faith 43: 3168: 3017: 2978:VeryRarelyStable 2951: 2865:VeryRarelyStable 2850: 2801:VeryRarelyStable 2774: 2754:VeryRarelyStable 2726: 2709:Female genitalia 2673:VeryRarelyStable 2666: 2653:VeryRarelyStable 2650: 2542:VeryRarelyStable 2507:VeryRarelyStable 2504: 2486: 2460:VeryRarelyStable 2453: 2323:Recent reversion 2216:VeryRarelyStable 2097:VeryRarelyStable 2059:VeryRarelyStable 2050:VeryRarelyStable 1966:VeryRarelyStable 1895:VeryRarelyStable 1814:VeryRarelyStable 1800: 1716: 1704:VeryRarelyStable 1698:people, but not 1633:VeryRarelyStable 1475:VeryRarelyStable 1383: 1327:VeryRarelyStable 1198: 1164: 1163: 1151: 976:VeryRarelyStable 953: 915: 907: 869: 862: 828: 827: 824: 821: 818: 793: 788: 787: 786: 777: 770: 769: 764: 756: 749: 719: 718: 715: 712: 709: 688: 683: 682: 672: 665: 664: 659: 651: 644: 614: 613: 610: 607: 604: 583: 578: 577: 567: 560: 559: 554: 546: 539: 505: 495: 469: 468: 465: 462: 459: 436: 431: 430: 429: 420: 413: 412: 407: 404: 393: 386: 374:importance scale 356: 355: 352: 349: 346: 325: 318: 317: 312: 304: 297: 280: 274: 273: 265: 237: 230: 222: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 3176: 3175: 3171: 3170: 3169: 3167: 3166: 3165: 3071: 3070: 3056: 3032: 3030:Page size again 2971:Naturist resort 2884: 2711: 2660: 2644: 2498: 2345: 2325: 2285:Free the nipple 2262: 2090:Naturist resort 1779: 1776: 1757:nomination page 1743: 1711:So much this. - 1606: 1601: 1600: 1412: 1379: 1372: 1352: 1174: 1169: 1168: 1167: 1157: 1152: 1148: 1089: 1060:(a redirect to 1052:(a redirect to 1047: 991: 963: 954: 949: 901: 878:, submitted by 826:nudity articles 825: 822: 819: 816: 815: 789: 784: 782: 762: 716: 713: 710: 707: 706: 684: 677: 657: 611: 608: 605: 602: 601: 594:human sexuality 579: 572: 552: 503: 466: 463: 460: 457: 456: 432: 427: 425: 405: 399: 353: 350: 347: 344: 343: 310: 281:on Knowledge's 278: 224: 223: 218: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 3174: 3172: 3164: 3163: 3158: 3153: 3148: 3143: 3138: 3133: 3128: 3123: 3118: 3113: 3108: 3103: 3098: 3093: 3088: 3083: 3073: 3072: 3055: 3052: 3041:WriterArtistDC 3031: 3028: 3027: 3026: 3025: 3024: 3006: 2984: 2983: 2974: 2967: 2940: 2939: 2883: 2880: 2879: 2878: 2877: 2876: 2875: 2874: 2873: 2872: 2871: 2870: 2861: 2839: 2826: 2822: 2797: 2793: 2789: 2785: 2763: 2750: 2746: 2710: 2707: 2706: 2705: 2704: 2703: 2702: 2701: 2687: 2684: 2658: 2604: 2603: 2602: 2601: 2600: 2599: 2598: 2597: 2596: 2595: 2594: 2593: 2592: 2591: 2590: 2589: 2588: 2587: 2586: 2585: 2568: 2554: 2483:Edmund Patrick 2456: 2455: 2454: 2440: 2429: 2428: 2427: 2426: 2425: 2424: 2406: 2402: 2398: 2344: 2343:New lead image 2341: 2324: 2321: 2320: 2319: 2301: 2281: 2261: 2258: 2257: 2256: 2255: 2254: 2253: 2252: 2237: 2233: 2229: 2228: 2227: 2226: 2225: 2224: 2223: 2222: 2221: 2212: 2196: 2179: 2178: 2177: 2176: 2175: 2174: 2173: 2172: 2171: 2170: 2169: 2168: 2142: 2141: 2140: 2139: 2138: 2137: 2136: 2135: 2134: 2133: 2132: 2131: 2117: 2116: 2115: 2114: 2113: 2112: 2111: 2110: 2109: 2108: 2107: 2106: 2093: 2082: 2043: 2042: 2041: 2040: 2039: 2038: 2037: 2036: 2035: 2034: 2033: 2032: 2006: 2005: 2004: 2003: 2002: 2001: 2000: 1999: 1998: 1997: 1996: 1995: 1980: 1979: 1978: 1977: 1976: 1975: 1974: 1973: 1972: 1971: 1952: 1951: 1950: 1949: 1948: 1947: 1946: 1945: 1923: 1922: 1921: 1920: 1919: 1918: 1917: 1916: 1905: 1904: 1903: 1902: 1901: 1900: 1886: 1885: 1884: 1883: 1866: 1865: 1864: 1863: 1856: 1855: 1840: 1839: 1838: 1837: 1806:WP:NOTCENSORED 1775: 1772: 1753: 1752: 1742: 1739: 1738: 1737: 1736: 1735: 1734: 1733: 1732: 1731: 1730: 1729: 1717:the grumpy dog 1681: 1680: 1679: 1678: 1677: 1676: 1666:WriterArtistDC 1639: 1638: 1617:WriterArtistDC 1605: 1602: 1594: 1593: 1592: 1548: 1547: 1532: 1531: 1526: 1525: 1508: 1507: 1498: 1497: 1487:WriterArtistDC 1480: 1459: 1458: 1448:WriterArtistDC 1429:WriterArtistDC 1411: 1410: 1409: 1408: 1407: 1374: 1373: 1371: 1368: 1351: 1348: 1333: 1332: 1323: 1288: 1287: 1271: 1270: 1269: 1268: 1239: 1238: 1195:Edmund Patrick 1173: 1170: 1166: 1165: 1145: 1144: 1140: 1134:Uanfala (talk) 1088: 1085: 1046: 1043: 1042: 1041: 1012: 1011: 1008: 1005: 1002: 990: 987: 962: 959: 956: 955: 947: 945: 942: 941: 917: 903: 902: 872: 870: 858: 857: 854: 853: 850: 849: 842:Top-importance 838: 832: 831: 829: 812:the discussion 795: 794: 778: 766: 765: 763:Top‑importance 757: 745: 744: 741: 740: 733:Low-importance 729: 723: 722: 720: 703:the discussion 690: 689: 686:Society portal 673: 661: 660: 658:Low‑importance 652: 640: 639: 636: 635: 628:Mid-importance 624: 618: 617: 615: 598:the discussion 585: 584: 568: 556: 555: 553:Mid‑importance 547: 535: 534: 531: 530: 527: 526: 521: 511: 510: 508: 506: 500: 499: 491: 490: 483:Low-importance 479: 473: 472: 470: 438: 437: 421: 409: 408: 406:Low‑importance 394: 382: 381: 378: 377: 370:Low-importance 366: 360: 359: 357: 340:the discussion 326: 314: 313: 311:Low‑importance 305: 293: 292: 286: 275: 261: 260: 246: 238: 226: 225: 216: 214: 213: 210: 209: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3173: 3162: 3159: 3157: 3154: 3152: 3149: 3147: 3144: 3142: 3139: 3137: 3134: 3132: 3129: 3127: 3124: 3122: 3119: 3117: 3114: 3112: 3109: 3107: 3104: 3102: 3099: 3097: 3094: 3092: 3089: 3087: 3084: 3082: 3079: 3078: 3076: 3069: 3068: 3065: 3061: 3053: 3051: 3050: 3046: 3042: 3037: 3029: 3023: 3020: 3014: 3012: 3007: 3005: 3001: 2997: 2994: 2993: 2991: 2986: 2985: 2982: 2979: 2975: 2972: 2968: 2964: 2960: 2959: 2958: 2957: 2954: 2948: 2946: 2938: 2934: 2930: 2925: 2921: 2920: 2919: 2918: 2914: 2910: 2903: 2899: 2898: 2894: 2890: 2881: 2869: 2866: 2862: 2858: 2857: 2856: 2853: 2847: 2845: 2840: 2837: 2832: 2827: 2823: 2820: 2816: 2812: 2807: 2806: 2805: 2802: 2798: 2794: 2790: 2786: 2782: 2781: 2780: 2777: 2771: 2769: 2764: 2760: 2759: 2758: 2755: 2751: 2747: 2744: 2740: 2735: 2734: 2733: 2732: 2729: 2723: 2721: 2715: 2708: 2700: 2696: 2692: 2691:Anirudh131819 2688: 2685: 2682: 2679: 2678: 2677: 2674: 2670: 2664: 2663:Anirudh131819 2659: 2657: 2654: 2648: 2647:Anirudh131819 2643: 2642: 2641: 2637: 2633: 2632:Anirudh131819 2629: 2626: 2625: 2624: 2623: 2619: 2615: 2610: 2608: 2607:Anirudh131819 2584: 2580: 2576: 2575:Anirudh131819 2572: 2569: 2567: 2563: 2559: 2558:Anirudh131819 2555: 2551: 2548: 2547: 2546: 2543: 2539: 2535: 2530: 2529: 2528: 2524: 2520: 2519:Anirudh131819 2516: 2513: 2512: 2511: 2508: 2502: 2497: 2496: 2495: 2491: 2490: 2484: 2480: 2479: 2478: 2474: 2470: 2466: 2465: 2464: 2461: 2457: 2452: 2448: 2447: 2445: 2441: 2437: 2436: 2435: 2434: 2433: 2432: 2431: 2430: 2421: 2420: 2419: 2415: 2411: 2407: 2403: 2399: 2395: 2394: 2393: 2389: 2385: 2380: 2379: 2378: 2377: 2373: 2369: 2364: 2363: 2359: 2355: 2349: 2342: 2340: 2339: 2335: 2331: 2322: 2318: 2314: 2310: 2306: 2302: 2298: 2297:summary style 2294: 2290: 2286: 2282: 2279: 2278: 2277: 2276: 2272: 2268: 2259: 2251: 2247: 2243: 2238: 2234: 2230: 2220: 2217: 2213: 2209: 2205: 2201: 2197: 2193: 2192: 2191: 2190: 2189: 2188: 2187: 2186: 2185: 2184: 2183: 2182: 2181: 2180: 2167: 2163: 2159: 2154: 2153: 2152: 2151: 2150: 2149: 2148: 2147: 2146: 2145: 2144: 2143: 2129: 2128: 2127: 2126: 2125: 2124: 2123: 2122: 2121: 2120: 2119: 2118: 2103: 2102: 2101: 2098: 2094: 2091: 2087: 2083: 2079: 2078: 2077: 2073: 2069: 2065: 2064: 2063: 2060: 2056: 2055: 2054: 2051: 2047: 2046: 2045: 2044: 2031: 2027: 2023: 2018: 2017: 2016: 2015: 2014: 2013: 2012: 2011: 2010: 2009: 2008: 2007: 1992: 1991: 1990: 1989: 1988: 1987: 1986: 1985: 1984: 1983: 1982: 1981: 1970: 1967: 1962: 1961: 1960: 1959: 1958: 1957: 1956: 1955: 1954: 1953: 1944: 1940: 1936: 1931: 1930: 1929: 1928: 1927: 1926: 1925: 1924: 1913: 1912: 1911: 1910: 1909: 1908: 1907: 1906: 1899: 1896: 1892: 1891: 1890: 1889: 1888: 1887: 1882: 1878: 1874: 1870: 1869: 1868: 1867: 1860: 1859: 1858: 1857: 1854: 1850: 1846: 1842: 1841: 1836: 1832: 1828: 1824: 1820: 1819: 1818: 1815: 1811: 1807: 1803: 1802: 1801: 1799: 1795: 1791: 1787: 1783: 1773: 1771: 1770: 1766: 1762: 1758: 1751: 1748: 1747: 1746: 1740: 1728: 1725: 1724: 1720: 1715: 1710: 1709: 1708: 1705: 1701: 1697: 1693: 1689: 1688: 1687: 1686: 1685: 1684: 1683: 1682: 1675: 1671: 1667: 1663: 1658: 1657: 1656: 1652: 1648: 1643: 1642: 1641: 1640: 1637: 1634: 1629: 1628: 1627: 1626: 1622: 1618: 1614: 1609: 1604:Needs cleanup 1603: 1598: 1591: 1587: 1583: 1579: 1578:summary style 1575: 1574: 1569: 1565: 1564: 1563: 1562: 1558: 1554: 1546: 1542: 1538: 1534: 1533: 1528: 1527: 1523: 1519: 1515: 1514: 1512: 1505: 1500: 1499: 1496: 1492: 1488: 1484: 1481: 1479: 1476: 1472: 1468: 1464: 1461: 1460: 1457: 1453: 1449: 1445: 1441: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1434: 1430: 1425: 1421: 1417: 1406: 1402: 1398: 1397:Shhhnotsoloud 1394: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1385: 1382: 1376: 1375: 1369: 1367: 1366: 1362: 1358: 1349: 1347: 1346: 1342: 1338: 1331: 1328: 1324: 1320: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1312: 1308: 1304: 1295: 1291: 1286: 1282: 1278: 1273: 1272: 1263: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1255: 1254: 1253: 1249: 1245: 1237: 1233: 1229: 1224: 1223: 1222: 1221: 1217: 1213: 1208: 1207: 1203: 1202: 1196: 1191: 1190: 1186: 1182: 1181:Yannicksoulie 1178: 1171: 1161: 1155: 1150: 1147: 1143: 1139: 1138: 1135: 1131: 1127: 1121: 1119: 1118: 1117:joie de vivre 1113: 1109: 1108:Henri Matisse 1105: 1101: 1095: 1093: 1086: 1084: 1083: 1079: 1075: 1071: 1067: 1063: 1059: 1055: 1051: 1044: 1040: 1036: 1032: 1028: 1027: 1026: 1025: 1021: 1017: 1009: 1006: 1003: 1000: 999: 998: 996: 988: 986: 985: 981: 977: 973: 969: 960: 944: 943: 940: 939: 935: 931: 927: 923: 918: 916: 914: 908: 900: 897: 895: 894: 889: 888:audio version 885: 881: 877: 871: 868: 864: 863: 847: 843: 837: 834: 833: 830: 813: 809: 805: 801: 800: 792: 791:Nudity portal 781: 779: 776: 772: 771: 767: 761: 758: 755: 751: 738: 734: 728: 725: 724: 721: 704: 700: 696: 695: 687: 681: 676: 674: 671: 667: 666: 662: 656: 653: 650: 646: 633: 629: 623: 620: 619: 616: 599: 595: 591: 590: 582: 576: 571: 569: 566: 562: 561: 557: 551: 548: 545: 541: 525: 517: 513: 512: 509: 507: 502: 501: 496: 492: 488: 484: 478: 475: 474: 471: 454: 453: 448: 444: 443: 435: 424: 422: 419: 415: 414: 410: 403: 398: 395: 392: 388: 375: 371: 365: 362: 361: 358: 341: 337: 333: 332: 327: 324: 320: 319: 315: 309: 306: 303: 299: 294: 290: 284: 276: 272: 267: 266: 258: 254: 250: 244: 243: 239: 236: 232: 231: 212: 211: 208: 204: 200: 196: 192: 189: 187: 183: 182: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 3057: 3033: 2941: 2923: 2907: 2885: 2788:effectively. 2742: 2738: 2716: 2712: 2668: 2611: 2605: 2537: 2488: 2365: 2350: 2346: 2326: 2263: 2207: 2203: 2199: 2085: 1780:— Preceding 1777: 1754: 1744: 1722: 1713: 1699: 1695: 1691: 1612: 1610: 1607: 1596: 1571: 1549: 1510: 1482: 1470: 1466: 1462: 1413: 1392: 1386: 1380: 1377: 1353: 1334: 1318: 1300: 1289: 1240: 1209: 1200: 1192: 1179: 1175: 1149: 1141: 1129: 1123: 1115: 1097: 1090: 1058:Clothes free 1048: 1013: 992: 989:Article size 971: 964: 919: 910: 898: 892: 873: 841: 797: 732: 692: 627: 587: 482: 450: 440: 369: 345:Anthropology 336:Anthropology 329: 308:Anthropology 289:WikiProjects 240: 184: 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 2689:Thank you. 2305:WikiProject 2300:contribute! 2267:Mira.Medusa 1823:WP:NOTFORUM 1662:Gymnophobic 1631:reversed. — 1463:Don't merge 874:There is a 148:free images 31:not a forum 3075:Categories 2293:Body image 2289:Topfreedom 1393:not merged 1142:References 1110:and other 1104:André Gide 1054:Nude beach 1014:Thoughts? 920:Archives: 886:), for an 458:Philosophy 447:philosophy 397:Philosophy 2961:I'm with 2309:Texttramp 1537:Texttramp 1357:Texttramp 1074:Thryduulf 995:WP:TOOBIG 708:Sociology 699:sociology 655:Sociology 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 3064:RMCD bot 2819:Image #6 2811:image #4 2628:@Arjayay 2086:Guardian 1794:contribs 1782:unsigned 1700:everyone 1613:naturism 1553:naturist 1130:naturism 880:Landlund 808:naturism 186:Archives 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 25:Naturism 3011:Biofase 2963:Biofase 2945:Biofase 2924:fitting 2844:Biofase 2768:Biofase 2720:Biofase 2667:You do 2614:Arjayay 2200:pattern 1827:Kleuske 1810:WP:NPOV 1582:Colin M 1483:Comment 1427:NPOV.-- 1031:SunCrow 1016:SunCrow 968:SunCrow 876:request 844:on the 735:on the 630:on the 485:on the 372:on the 279:C-class 154:WP refs 142:scholar 3018:stalk 2996:Lumos3 2952:stalk 2929:Lumos3 2909:Lumos3 2889:Lumos3 2851:stalk 2792:about. 2775:stalk 2739:per se 2727:stalk 2534:Nudity 2489:confer 2444:Nudity 2211:abuse. 1518:Google 1465:− but 1442:Added 1244:Lumos3 1201:confer 1062:Nudity 1056:) and 817:Nudity 804:nudity 760:Nudity 285:scale. 126:Google 2469:Aréat 2384:Aréat 2352:page. 2242:KKDIV 2105:body. 1319:other 1277:Aréat 1212:Aréat 1112:Fauve 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 3045:talk 3000:talk 2933:talk 2913:talk 2893:talk 2695:talk 2636:talk 2618:talk 2579:talk 2562:talk 2523:talk 2473:talk 2414:talk 2388:talk 2372:talk 2358:talk 2334:talk 2330:Roly 2313:talk 2291:and 2271:talk 2246:talk 2162:talk 2072:talk 2026:talk 1939:talk 1877:talk 1849:talk 1845:Roly 1831:talk 1821:And 1808:and 1790:talk 1765:talk 1723:wooF 1714:Roxy 1696:most 1692:many 1670:talk 1651:talk 1647:Roly 1621:talk 1586:talk 1557:talk 1541:talk 1491:talk 1471:that 1452:talk 1433:talk 1401:talk 1361:talk 1341:talk 1337:Roly 1307:talk 1303:Roly 1281:talk 1248:talk 1232:talk 1228:Roly 1216:talk 1185:talk 1160:help 1078:talk 1068:and 1035:talk 1020:talk 980:talk 972:back 884:talk 806:and 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 2966:it. 2836:#22 2831:#21 2815:#15 2743:are 2669:not 2538:why 2208:not 1812:. — 1759:. — 1664:.-- 1522:DDG 836:Top 727:Low 622:Mid 477:Low 364:Low 176:TWL 3077:: 3047:) 3002:) 2935:) 2915:) 2895:) 2817:. 2697:) 2638:) 2620:) 2581:) 2564:) 2525:) 2475:) 2416:) 2390:) 2374:) 2360:) 2336:) 2328:-- 2315:) 2307:. 2287:, 2273:) 2248:) 2164:) 2074:) 2028:) 1941:) 1879:) 1851:) 1833:) 1825:. 1796:) 1792:• 1767:) 1672:) 1653:) 1645:-- 1623:) 1588:) 1559:) 1543:) 1520:, 1493:) 1467:do 1454:) 1435:) 1403:) 1363:) 1343:) 1309:) 1301:-- 1283:) 1250:) 1234:) 1226:-- 1218:) 1187:) 1080:) 1037:) 1022:) 982:) 936:, 932:, 928:, 924:, 896:. 504:/ 400:: 205:, 201:, 197:, 193:, 156:) 54:; 3043:( 3015:| 2998:( 2976:— 2949:| 2931:( 2911:( 2891:( 2863:— 2848:| 2799:— 2772:| 2752:— 2724:| 2693:( 2665:: 2661:@ 2649:: 2645:@ 2634:( 2616:( 2577:( 2560:( 2521:( 2503:: 2499:@ 2485:– 2471:( 2458:— 2412:( 2386:( 2370:( 2356:( 2332:( 2311:( 2269:( 2244:( 2214:— 2160:( 2095:— 2070:( 2024:( 1937:( 1875:( 1847:( 1829:( 1788:( 1763:( 1719:. 1668:( 1649:( 1619:( 1584:( 1555:( 1539:( 1506:: 1489:( 1450:( 1431:( 1399:( 1359:( 1339:( 1325:— 1305:( 1279:( 1246:( 1230:( 1214:( 1197:– 1183:( 1162:) 1156:. 1076:( 1033:( 1018:( 978:( 938:5 934:4 930:3 926:2 922:1 882:( 848:. 739:. 634:. 489:. 376:. 291:: 259:. 245:. 207:5 203:4 199:3 195:2 191:1 188:: 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index