Talk:Naturism/Archive 1

1219:

checked, but I doubt those articles are subject to a “Hall of Shame” type link that lists child-sex predators that have been affiliated with those organizations. As a result, singling out naturists exhibits an unfair bias. Readers might incorrectly observe that only naturists and not other adult-child organizations have these problems and incorrectly conclude that there is something basically wrong with running about undressed. I would withdraw my objection to this link if folks would add similar links to the aforementioned organizations. However, I think anyone who tried would find their links expediently deleted. As a result, I think it’s equally fair not to include such links in this article as well.

594:

climate regarding paedophilia we really ought not have an image that some overzealous member of the "moral majority" could misinterpret in that way. (Note that I don't think there is anything wrong with the image, but when parents have been questioned for many hours for taking photos of their children in the bath, its best (imho) to be extraordinarily cautious). If theres consensus I'm tempted to slip it quietly through IfD as OR UE to try and avoid the furory (sp?) that has surrounded an image that shows one of Kate Winslett's breasts slightly out of focus in the context of a much larger image.

234:

nudist organisations" to "Regional..." (I originally thought "national" but that would have excluded the worldwide region, if you could call it that) then floating some of the organisations from the external links up to that section so that it is easy for readers to determine the region. Then the links remaining in the "External links" section would just be miscellaneous items. Or should there be duplicates? Or should the External links just be tided up a little to organise them better?

701:

place in between these two periods (like nude swimming in UK, mixed genre groups saunas and bathings in scandinavian countries, etc.). Also, it seems that oriental forms of dealing with public nudity are not included (like japanese public baths). In this case, I believe it should be pointed that although nudity is usual and accepted in western societies on genre segregated locker rooms, the act of public bathing in the nude is not accepted even at genre segregated pools in the west.

688:"General" section. Also, the text has a few tricky NPOV issues that may require the sentences to be completely rewritten, specifically statements such as "nudists are generally accepting people..." In an earlier revision, I rewrote one of these to say something along the lines of, "Nudists describe themselves as accepting...", but I do not consider that very good wording. I'm not going to say that the statement as such is not fact, but they sound like nudist POV opinion. -- 92:- I have just read this page and feel that it gives the impression that all nudist activities occur within the confines of clubs and management? Beaches etc. don't generally have these rules. Nudists are people who like to have no clothes. Some choose to go to nudist places. They are nudists first. Also, there seems to be way too much going on in the article about erections - it's a non-issue, mention it in passing, but way too much in this article. 31: 1274: 317:

exactly the attraction and the point of naturism. The viewer sees that naturists activities are neither sexual encounters, coy or shameful, embarassing or furtive. Its message is quite different from most of the often pornographic or sexualized images of nudity that are inflicted on North Americans by the various media. It would be a shame for this article on naturistm to have to loose this illustration.

774: 1173:

naked activity is a nudist activity to a nudist and not to a non-nudist. So it's more of a state of mind. I think this is a more successful definition rather than coming up with criterias such as "must be mixed gender," or it must be "for reasons of health," "originating in so-and-so movement," etc. What do others think? --

468:

However, other than for a link for a goth nudist mailing list on a local city webpage, I come up with nothing pertinent to this growing moment in a casual reading of the first 30 or so links. Most of the links are just hitting on the search term fodder that sex-themed sites add to the bottom of every page.

1172:

Oxford American Dictionaries, which is a Mac OS X widget, defines a nudist as follows: "a person who engages in the practice of going naked wherever possible." I sort of like this definition the most. To the earlier question I posed of whether locker room showers is nudism, the answer would be that a

233:

I think that since the list of "Major nudist organisations" consists of external links that some reorganisation with the "External Links" section would be good. For instance many of the external links point to organisations that are specific to one country or area. I was thinking that renaming "Major

1207:

I agree that that link is relevant to the article. In the short term, just keep adding it back. I've added this page to my Watchlist so I can keep an eye on it too. You can also file an RfC (Request for Comment) to invite other Wikipedians to weigh in on whether the link should be there. See the

1137:

I wouldn't object to removing that single sentence add-on. That sentence would be useful perhaps when describing Egyptian historical art and lifestyle, perhaps, but doesn't serve much of a purpose in the current article, and there's also the question of verifiability. It's also very vague as to what

738:

True up to a point. But sometimes it seems pointless, e.g. keeping the shoes on indoors (like in the image that used to be here). Moreover, while some may choose to start by going nude except for the feet, I'd think most would soon develop into full-fledged nudists, and so nudity from head to foot

683:

Portions of the discussion about erections I thought were more appropriate for the "Manners" section, since they were clearly describing matters of etiquette (should "Manners" section be retitled "Etiquette"?). I moved the bulk of this text to that section. However, since erections do also relate to

136:

Oh well... I was the author of the original tongue in cheek reference to volleyball. Because of bouncing body parts it is a favorite shot to include in naturist documentaries. In fact however, one can find it really played by some naturists. I believe that the dry technical reasoning that is now

756:

As illustrated on the main Knowledge page for "nudism" imho the nudist man is an exhibitionist. Is this the best the nudists can do for a graphic? To show a man by himself with be taken as Gay and to put a woman will be sexual exploitation because the movement is predominately white men? But can't

700:

I believe the history section, although accurate as far as I am aware, is not complete. It seems to be something missing in between the Roman and Greek attitude towards nudity and the 20th century when the organized movement was sort of created. There are several examples of nude activities taking

538:

Most nudists automatically avoid looking at each other beyond breast height except in passing. And due to fears of pedophiles, most US family-oriented clubs have very strict rules against any adult male talking to any child that isn't their own for anything but a very short verbal exchange. This

316:

Also concur. The illustration is explicit enough to represent what a naturist venue actually looks like, but is not exploitative. It demonstrates that mixed gender casual nude interactions are normal in every way, and shows people who are comfortably nude and apparently enjoying the experience -

172:

New person: I disagree that an erection isn't an issue. Look on nusit message boards for starters, it is one oof the most worried about problems. And considering the absolute likelihood of a spontaneous accidental erection, I would certainly worry bout it and about the reactions to it, considering

1218:

I'm not deleting the link, though I don't think it belongs. It's not NPOV. The reason why it's not NPOV is that the pedo problem isn't unique to naturists. The "hall of shame" moniker could also apply to the Boy Scouts, kid’s sports coaches (like Little League), and school teachers. I haven’t

661:

think it is an obvious fact. Perhaps better than "consider it an obvious fact" is simply "believe," but the meaning is roughly the same. I'm comfortable with a change to "believe." The rest of my wording I believe was unquestionably NPOV, though please elaborate if you disagree -- helps me in the

593:

imho this image is not suitable as it doesn't really illustrate the social aspect of nudism, which imho is a key thing to show. Also, while I don't have a problem with the apropriateness in another context and it is completely legal (as I understand the relevant laws), given the current political

556:

One thing about the pic...if it's to make a more realistic impression about nudism, perhaps it should be something that doesn't resemble yet another nude beach pic, where even non-nudists go once in a while. How about a pic showing people going about their everyday life (in a non-private setting)

467:

I have a problem with the inclusion of the paragraph on 'the goth nudist movement'. I have familiarity with the Goth scene from several cities, and this mention in wikipedia is the first I've ever heard of it. A google search for +goth +nudist turns up 140,000 pages, of which wikipedia is first.

1126:

There's a curious statement in the article: "In ancient Egypt under Pharaoh Akhen-Aton (1385-1353 BCE) public nudity was not at all uncommon". I wonder what is the source for this. And should we conclude from this one reign being singled out that nudity was uncommon in the rest of the very long

761:

There are lots of much better images of nudism than we have here; however all the ones I have seen have been copyrighted. I have asked several webmasters to release a picture under an apropriate liscence and only one has responded (they said that they were not the copyright holder and could not

687:

There are also somewhat irrelevant issues in the "Manners" section such as the statement about nudists wearing clothing when weather demands it. While certainly worthy of mention, that doesn't seem to be a matter of etiquette but rather a matter of practicality -- perhaps better suited for the

652:

Older (now current) revision of "Nudism is not sex" section reads like nudist marketing (very clearly nudist POV). Edit summary for revert says opinion was described as fact and one POV was replaced with another. However, the only thing I can see that suggests such a thing is "Many non-nudists

1182:

I'm adding a link to the "issues in Social Nudism" page from the iniitial definitions section, because some users may arrive trying to find the difference between naturism and nudism, and all that's said here is "they're the same", whereas the other page gets into an attempt at defining them

432:

If it's too long and awkward, how about "Naturists find going without clothing both enjoyable and relaxing"? I happen to agree with the naturist POV, but I understand that other people do find it unpleasant or awkward. The previous caption reads like a standard sales pitch after the legal

300:

Concur. I personally think most naturists go *too* far off the "no sex, please; we're nudists" cliff in an attempt to salvage what popular acceptance they can, myself -- and that this is almost as bad as the hangups textiles struggle with -- but I don't have any problem with the

476:

I also had never heard of it, and was extremely excited. I live in San Francisco, and if there's a Goth Nudist movement, it'd surely have a large following here. A long, long Google search later, and I'm empty-handed. I think someone's just having a little fun with us here.

486:

I agree. I admit there is showing of flesh in the Goth scene, but it is mostly do to revealing clothing, or crossovers with the S+M scene. It doesn't have anything to do with nudism as far as I know. As I stated, the best I can come up with is one link to one mailing list.

433:

department substitutes "can be" for "is"... a bit of phrasing which doesn't make your average TV commercial NPOV. It's just a sales pitch that won't get the advertiser sued. By attributing the opinion to someone, the longer version is a more objective statement of fact.

390:--- Why is it so hard to find a decent picture? So far we've had child porn, anatomical drawings, goatse, exhibitionism, and now a playboy photoshoot. Somebody needs to just go to Voyeurweb and ask if they can borrow some of the "What I've Seen" section. --Superslash 637:

I've just gone through and alphebetised all the external links on the article, but there are a very large number. I think that it would be worthwile going through and removing all of those that aren't notable. As it is I think its in danger of becomming a link farm.

416:

IMO, the caption which attributes to naturists a position which they do in fact take in public is a more appropriate approach than the current(ly reverted) shorter version, which positions that opinion as that of the entry itself. I vote for "Naturists find..."

399:

I don't understand how this change results in a more neutral point of view. It certains reduces readability. I feel we should change it back, so I will revert it for now to make it more readable and then wait to see how much support there might be for the new

896:

I propose people mention the image's name, so we know which image we were talking about even after the image is swapped with another one. This might be less confusing than referring to an image as "the image" when the article keeps changing images.

215:

I just don't see what this quote was trying to show. Of course you find opinions on everything on the net, and this one seems not in any way special. Unless it's from some sort of authority on the field, I simply doubt it provides any information.

985:

Imho this image wasn't pornogrpahic, but because it was a full-frontal picture of a naked human female under the age of 18 (presumably 12, based on the image name) it was highly likely to come under the definition of "Child Pornography" in some

534:

I objected to the early introduction of mention of pedophilia and sexual concerns, so I moved them further down and reworded the base article. The eye-level comment is just wrong, as is the men vs women conversation with a minor "rule".

808:

Is nudism simply "non-sexual full nudity" or does it have to be associated with a certain industry, club membership or nationality? Below are some fully nude non-sexual activities. Which of them can be considered nudism?

585:. As the image has no source nor copyright information, and the subject appears to be under age, I removed it from the article pending information on the source and feedback on the appropriateness of using this image. -- 201:

I have added the source, but someone deleted the quote anyway on the ground "Obscure reference from a board, hardly a reasonable source of information". As source of information I would agree, for a quote it may not be a

727:

Sand gets hot, rocks are everywhere, and lots of people don't have tough feet. I do admit we had a great time at Avalon in West Virginia when we discarded the shoes, but I wouldn't do it everywhere. We wear sandals.

383:

There's a new picture up but i don't think it's a very good one. This seems more like something found on an exhibitionism page than nudism. Perhaps one of the more common sports pictures could be used? -Superslash

998:

evidently agreed and deleted the image. The image also had no information on its source, which would now make it a speedy-deletion criteria, regardless of content, but this was not the case when it was uploaded.

712:

In images of naturism I've seen, it seems that a lot of them wear nothing but shoes. To me, that doesn't properly constitute being nude. So why is it so common? It would seem logical if a lot of nudists are

684:

the "Association with sex" section, I think some of the discussion does still belong there. The question is how much. I left some of it there, but I still do not think it is all appropriate for that section.

340:

In my opinion, this is an article where a photo of nude people can be appropriate and encyclopedic. The one we have on the article currently, however, has no information as to the source or copyright. (See

610:

I also agree there should be a picture here, but not this one. I've been keeping an eye out, but on the one occasion so far I've seen something suitable the copyright holder never got back to me :(.

245:

Not all of them seem to classify as 'organisations' though (judging by the link names). If you can figure out a way to organise them, feel free. The "external links" aren't organised at all, anyway.

762:

therefore release the image under a different liscence, and did not now how to contact the person who does hold the copyright). I will keep trying, and encourage others to do so as well.

237:

Anyway, I just thought I'd flag this up to see what people thought before I rearranged anything. Let me know if you think this is a good idea or not or if you have a different idea... --

670:

Went ahead and made the change. I can see how the previous wording could give the appearance of a non-NPOV. I also think these revisions remove some excess baggage and read better. --

387:---I've seen the picture (the one with the naked bearded man and the woman in a red shirt) distributed elsewhere and described as Bay to Breakers, San Francisco, May 2005. --concept14 405:(The caption used to read 'Naturism can be both enjoyable and relaxing' but has been changed to 'Naturists find the practice of going without clothing both enjoyable and relaxing'.) 173:

tha fact that many women don't seem to believe that there is actually such thing as an accidental erection that has nothing to do with any sexual stimulus (such as sexual thoughts).

992:

cited "image title & content lead to suspicion that we are carrying what in many jurisdictions would be considered child pornography" as a reason to speedy-delete the image.

1049:

is less interesting since it is black and white, non-photograph and looks more like a diagram from a medical textbook rather than individuals enjoying nudist activities. --

1197:

The link for The Nudist Hall of Shame has been repeatedly deleted from the external links area. I would like to know how to prevent this censorship of criticism, please?

1098:

In my opinion, the nude image does not depict sexually explicit conduct as defined by US code: Title 18 Sect. 2256, hence it does not violate US child pornography law.

360:---i do not concur. this picture is all together too explicit for young researchers. perhaps have a link to the image on the page but not the image itself 448:

I like the new wording suggested above so I'll modify the caption to that in a mo'. Losing 'the practice of' makes it flow a lot better. Thanks guys!

495: 258:

I find the picture featured in this article to be pointlessly explicit! everyone knows what nudity looks like! this photo should be removed.

193:

It would probably be useful if the article said where this quote was from. (Also, does anyone have a better way of quoting italicised text?)

1281: 370:, but at present there is no picture in the article, either linked or inline, so I honestly fail to see how it can be too explicit. 1022:

One unsigned user decided that he was an "exhibitionist." No explanation given to support his/her claim, doesn't sign his posts. --

981:

16:25, 17. Apr 2005 Petaholmes "Image:- 12nohair.jpg" deleted (Image may be considered child pornography in some jurisdictions)

603:

I agree with Infrogmation, and removed the pic again after an anon put it back. But I think there should be some picture here.

137:

part of this article leaves out the humor and sense of mischief that infused this passage. Feel free to further adjust it. --

345:

for info on Knowledge's image use policy.) Perhaps someone could find a substitute with properly doccumented source, either

1062:

Yes, this is so, and maybe intentional so, if so. In absence of a better a better illustration, I have added this again --

1183:

separately. That might be best if it actually were on Naturism, but I'm not going to try a change of that magnitude.

653:

consider it an obvious fact" -- if this is the statement in question, then I would argue that the statement as such

1256: 38: 144:

I did think it was funny. However, I figured some people would not get the joke about nudists and volleyball!

950: 515:

I thought I wrote the correction about Sandy Hook National Park not existing but apparently it was written by

238: 79: 71: 66: 129:

demands it. Because it does not involve protective gear, nor does it involve much contact with the ground,

973: 582: 516: 1242: 1046: 923: 542: 367: 1184: 519:

so I want to retract my apology because I have nothing to apologize for because it wasn't my mistake.

1063: 879: 781: 188:

I really think that laws should simply be changed so that the entire world is a nudist resort 24/7".

1209: 1080: 1015: 740: 718: 1273: 689: 671: 663: 578: 267: 566: 217: 1154: 1128: 932: 901: 586: 354: 333:

rmed by 4.224.237.171 yesterday, it would seem. Consensus seems to be to leave it in place?

1090:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Jimbo_Wales&diff=prev&oldid=23398569

989: 488: 478: 469: 342: 1260: 1246: 1198: 1174: 1139: 1103: 1050: 1023: 995: 909: 883: 838:

nude tribes, past and present, that lives / have lived in a tropical or subtropical region

520: 1112: 1038: 1000: 841: 763: 639: 621: 611: 595: 570: 558: 499: 371: 1220: 936: 790: 789:

What does that have to do with nudism? And what "nudist man" are we talking about?

346: 334: 275: 246: 194: 47: 17: 729: 620:

and so I have emailed the webmaster asking for permission to use a suitable image.

449: 418: 406: 304: 203: 183: 148: 905: 1289:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

848: 604: 290: 93: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

717:

as part of it. If I ever came out, I know which sort I'd choose to be.... --

546: 320: 138: 130: 112: 617:

I've just come accross a site that claims to have over 7,900 naturist photos

1263: 1249: 1223: 1212: 1201: 1187: 1177: 1157: 1142: 1131: 1115: 1106: 1066: 1053: 1026: 1003: 959: 912: 886: 793: 784: 766: 743: 721: 642: 523: 279: 271: 220: 206: 122: 104: 96: 1234: 714: 826:

changing clothes, using the bathroom, or taking a shower in a lockerroom

813: 126: 108: 1111:

I agree, although imho it also doesn't illustrate nudism brilliantly.

771:

Would like to suggest as an intermediate solution the Voyager picture

1238: 829: 286:

at nudist resorts, as it can be clearly seen in the attached picture.

168:

It doesn't matter how it reads so long as the message still remains.

1099: 872: 865: 861: 772: 164:

At the moment it reads like a leaflet from the FKK or something.

820: 773: 702: 350: 1291: 1088:

04:20, 19. Sep 2005 Zscout370 "Image:Z140.jpg" deleted (as per

962:

deleted "Image:Nudist-aerobik1.jpg" (image uploaded by vandal)

25: 618: 1208:

Help link in the left-hand sidebar of any page for more. -

739:

would be the 'usual' form in which nudism is practised. --

496:

Knowledge:Oh, no! More bad jokes and other deleted nonsense

816:

therapy (patient covered by a towel, but nude underneath)

835:

at home, surfing the web / trimming the lawn in the nude

1089: 494:

The Goth nudist paragraph now has a place of honor on

380:---when it was there, it was there last time i looked 804:

When can non-sexual full nudity be considered nudism?

539:

rule, though, normally doesn't apply to adult women.

1233:I would like to propose to move common sections of 854:

gender segregated public baths in present day Korea

860:other Japanese public baths with required nudity ( 229:"Major nudist organizations" and "External Links" 155:Nudists carry cards? But they don't have pockets! 1241:as well as related issues to a new page called 868:, outdoor, indoor, mixed or segregated genders) 823:swimming pools, back when nudity was required 151:, who by, the way, is a card-carrying nudist 8: 1255:Implenting above. For discussion please see 1268: 282:, or other nasty things, which is in fact 1153:I've removed the sentence in question. -- 939:listed and tagged for deletion 30 + days) 906:US code title 18: part I: ch. 110: § 2256 648:NPOV issues and Nudism is not sex section 329:If everyone is pro-picture, where is it? 857:mixed gender public baths in rural Japan 1079:(Introduced: 01:30, 17 September 2005. 1287:Do not edit the contents of this page. 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 922:(Introduced: 11:50, 25 October 2004. 851:in Ancient Greece or the Roman Empire 115:actually is played by some nudists. 7: 1037:(Introduced: 07:52, 18 August 2005. 972:(Introduced: 20:18, 16 April 2005. 949:(Introduced: 20:33, 23 March 2005. 1014:(Introduced: 23:25, 29 June 2005. 752:The Nudist Man is an Exhibitionist 24: 1272: 29: 935:deleted "Image:Nudists37.JPG" ( 545:Sorry, wasn't logged in. I am 88:Comments moved from Talk:Nudism 1188:13:51, 20 September 2006 (UTC) 1116:23:14, 18 September 2005 (UTC) 1107:22:08, 18 September 2005 (UTC) 1054:22:08, 18 September 2005 (UTC) 1027:22:16, 18 September 2005 (UTC) 1004:23:14, 18 September 2005 (UTC) 913:22:08, 18 September 2005 (UTC) 887:03:03, 17 September 2005 (UTC) 577:A new photo was just added by 262:I don't agree. Some people do 1: 1224:00:45, 27 February 2006 (UTC) 1213:06:58, 24 February 2006 (UTC) 1202:17:18, 23 February 2006 (UTC) 1178:08:09, 31 December 2005 (UTC) 1143:08:13, 31 December 2005 (UTC) 1132:07:42, 25 December 2005 (UTC) 524:01:08, 08 December 2004 (UTC) 125:and will wear clothes if the 111:demands it. For some reason, 107:and will wear clothes if the 1127:history of ancient Egypt? -- 97:10:31, 20 October 2005 (UTC) 1158:15:21, 4 January 2006 (UTC) 1067:10:15, 7 October 2005 (UTC) 744:17:12, 5 October 2005 (UTC) 366:thank you for your comment 1312: 1264:08:29, 13 March 2006 (UTC) 1257:Talk:Clothes_free_movement 794:20:18, 7 August 2006 (UTC) 785:11:52, 1 August 2005 (UTC) 692:18:09, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC) 565:Something like a photo of 511:Retraction of my apologize 254:is this picture necessary? 1250:23:26, 8 March 2006 (UTC) 945:Image:Nudist-aerobik1.jpg 767:13:03, 29 July 2005 (UTC) 757:you do better than this? 722:12:42, 14 July 2005 (UTC) 674:05:05, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC) 666:03:59, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC) 657:a fact. Many non-nudists 614:12:29, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC) 607:10:05, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC) 589:06:22, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC) 561:17:15, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC) 357:16:39, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC) 141:00:37, 15 Apr 2004 (UTC) 931:07:00, 25 February 2005 643:10:46, 30 May 2005 (UTC) 633:Too many external links? 624:13:02, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC) 598:09:26, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC) 573:17:38, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC) 504:18:27, Dec 4, 2004 (UTC) 491:09:18, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC) 472:22:14, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC) 452:12:26, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC) 421:20:55, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC) 409:20:46, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC) 394:Picture caption and NPOV 374:22:57, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC) 293:09:16, 31 Oct 2004 (UTC) 249:18:53, 2004 Aug 30 (UTC) 241:02:15, 8 Aug 2004 (UTC) 221:17:17, 23 May 2004 (UTC) 207:08:05, 23 May 2004 (UTC) 197:18:32, 2004 May 2 (UTC) 1045:The image based on the 882:would be a good idea? — 481:09:12, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC) 323:19:35, 6 Nov 2004 (UTC) 307:04:50, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC) 778: 133:is played by nudists. 123:sun protection lotions 105:sun protection lotions 1285:of past discussions. 1243:Clothes free movement 1229:Merge/move suggestion 1138:it means by nudity.-- 968:Image: - 12nohair.jpg 958:23:24, 23 March 2005 776: 463:Goth nudist movement? 42:of past discussions. 1010:Image:Nudist man.jpg 679:Organization of text 583:Image:- 12nohair.jpg 121:+ Nudists often use 103:- Nudists often use 1193:Criticism of nudism 918:Image:Nudists37.JPG 900:For reference, see 892:Picture discussions 847:gender segregated 844:in a secluded pond 779: 349:or licenced under 239:Colin Angus Mackay 1299: 1298: 1292:current talk page 1047:Pioneer 11 plaque 902:Child pornography 708:From the ankle up 368:User:66.213.25.12 85: 84: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 1303: 1294: 1276: 1269: 530:Removed material 343:Knowledge:Images 63: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 1311: 1310: 1306: 1305: 1304: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1290: 1231: 1195: 1170: 1168:Defining nudism 1124: 1077: 1035: 1033:Image:Human.png 1012: 970: 947: 920: 894: 880:Category:Nudism 878:Maybe creating 806: 754: 710: 698: 681: 650: 635: 554: 532: 513: 465: 450:Chris Jefferies 407:Chris Jefferies 396: 256: 231: 179: 162: 90: 59: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1309: 1307: 1297: 1296: 1277: 1267: 1266: 1230: 1227: 1216: 1215: 1210:MichaelBluejay 1194: 1191: 1169: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1146: 1145: 1123: 1120: 1119: 1118: 1109: 1095: 1094: 1076: 1075:Image:Z140.jpg 1073: 1072: 1071: 1070: 1069: 1057: 1056: 1034: 1031: 1030: 1029: 1011: 1008: 1007: 1006: 993: 987: 986:jurisdictions. 983: 969: 966: 965: 964: 946: 943: 942: 941: 919: 916: 893: 890: 876: 875: 869: 858: 855: 852: 845: 842:skinny dipping 839: 836: 833: 827: 824: 817: 805: 802: 801: 800: 799: 798: 797: 796: 753: 750: 749: 748: 747: 746: 741:ClosetNaturist 733: 732: 719:ClosetNaturist 709: 706: 697: 696:Nudism history 694: 680: 677: 676: 675: 649: 646: 634: 631: 630: 629: 628: 627: 626: 625: 600: 599: 575: 574: 553: 550: 531: 528: 517:141.150.107.19 512: 509: 508: 507: 506: 505: 483: 482: 464: 461: 460: 459: 458: 457: 456: 455: 454: 453: 439: 438: 437: 436: 435: 434: 425: 424: 423: 422: 411: 410: 402: 401: 395: 392: 378: 377: 376: 375: 338: 337: 327: 326: 325: 324: 318: 311: 310: 309: 308: 302: 295: 294: 287: 270:, or at least 255: 252: 251: 250: 230: 227: 226: 225: 224: 223: 210: 209: 191: 190: 178: 175: 170: 169: 161: 158: 157: 156: 102: 89: 86: 83: 82: 77: 74: 69: 64: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1308: 1293: 1288: 1284: 1283: 1278: 1275: 1271: 1270: 1265: 1262: 1258: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1248: 1244: 1240: 1236: 1228: 1226: 1225: 1222: 1214: 1211: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1200: 1192: 1190: 1189: 1186: 1180: 1179: 1176: 1167: 1159: 1156: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1148: 1147: 1144: 1141: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1130: 1122:Ancient Egypt 1121: 1117: 1114: 1110: 1108: 1105: 1101: 1097: 1096: 1093: 1091: 1086: 1085: 1084: 1082: 1074: 1068: 1065: 1061: 1060: 1059: 1058: 1055: 1052: 1048: 1044: 1043: 1042: 1040: 1032: 1028: 1025: 1021: 1020: 1019: 1017: 1009: 1005: 1002: 997: 994: 991: 988: 984: 982: 979: 978: 977: 975: 967: 963: 961: 956: 955: 954: 952: 944: 940: 938: 934: 929: 928: 927: 925: 917: 915: 914: 911: 907: 903: 898: 891: 889: 888: 885: 881: 874: 871:Scandinavian 870: 867: 863: 859: 856: 853: 850: 846: 843: 840: 837: 834: 831: 828: 825: 822: 818: 815: 812: 811: 810: 803: 795: 792: 788: 787: 786: 783: 775: 770: 769: 768: 765: 760: 759: 758: 751: 745: 742: 737: 736: 735: 734: 731: 726: 725: 724: 723: 720: 716: 707: 705: 704: 695: 693: 691: 685: 678: 673: 669: 668: 667: 665: 660: 656: 647: 645: 644: 641: 632: 623: 619: 616: 615: 613: 609: 608: 606: 602: 601: 597: 592: 591: 590: 588: 584: 580: 572: 568: 564: 563: 562: 560: 551: 549: 548: 544: 543:70.25.236.234 540: 536: 529: 527: 525: 522: 518: 510: 503: 502: 497: 493: 492: 490: 485: 484: 480: 475: 474: 473: 471: 462: 451: 447: 446: 445: 444: 443: 442: 441: 440: 431: 430: 429: 428: 427: 426: 420: 415: 414: 413: 412: 408: 404: 403: 398: 397: 393: 391: 388: 385: 381: 373: 369: 365: 364: 363: 362: 361: 358: 356: 352: 348: 347:public domain 344: 336: 332: 331: 330: 322: 319: 315: 314: 313: 312: 306: 303: 299: 298: 297: 296: 292: 288: 285: 281: 277: 276:exhibitionism 273: 269: 265: 261: 260: 259: 253: 248: 244: 243: 242: 240: 235: 228: 222: 219: 214: 213: 212: 211: 208: 205: 200: 199: 198: 196: 189: 185: 181: 180: 176: 174: 167: 166: 165: 159: 154: 153: 152: 150: 145: 142: 140: 134: 132: 128: 124: 119: 116: 114: 110: 106: 100: 98: 95: 87: 81: 78: 75: 73: 70: 68: 65: 62: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 18:Talk:Naturism 1286: 1280: 1232: 1217: 1196: 1181: 1171: 1125: 1087: 1078: 1036: 1013: 980: 971: 957: 948: 933:Infrogmation 930: 921: 899: 895: 877: 849:public baths 807: 755: 711: 699: 686: 682: 662:future :) -- 658: 654: 651: 636: 587:Infrogmation 576: 555: 541: 537: 533: 514: 500: 466: 389: 386: 382: 379: 359: 355:Infrogmation 339: 328: 283: 263: 257: 236: 232: 192: 187: 184:User:Patrick 171: 163: 146: 143: 135: 120: 117: 101: 99:(Australia) 91: 60: 43: 37: 1279:This is an 1185:Moilforgold 990:Tagishsimon 777:nude people 715:barefooters 703:Vitor Cunha 579:User:Dp2005 489:Ultravoices 479:PhiloVivero 470:Ultravoices 266:it's about 36:This is an 1261:Dandelion1 1247:Dandelion1 1199:Nikkicraft 1175:MangoCurry 1140:MangoCurry 1104:MangoCurry 1081:image link 1064:Test-tools 1051:MangoCurry 1039:image link 1024:MangoCurry 1016:image link 996:Petaholmes 974:image link 951:image link 924:image link 910:MangoCurry 884:MangoCurry 819:male-only 782:Test-tools 567:Cap D'agde 552:The Pic... 521:Misterrick 202:problem.-- 182:(added by 160:Rather POV 131:volleyball 113:volleyball 1113:Thryduulf 1001:Thryduulf 830:showering 764:Thryduulf 640:Thryduulf 622:Thryduulf 612:Thryduulf 596:Thryduulf 571:Thryduulf 501:tregoweth 372:Thryduulf 280:voyeurism 272:eroticism 186:) Quote: 177:The Quote 80:Archive 5 72:Archive 3 67:Archive 2 61:Archive 1 1235:naturism 1221:Rklawton 400:version. 301:picture. 247:Elektron 195:Elektron 1282:archive 832:at home 814:massage 730:GABaker 419:Baylink 305:Baylink 284:lacking 264:believe 204:Patrick 149:GABaker 127:weather 109:weather 39:archive 1239:nudism 937:WP:PUI 873:saunas 791:Powers 690:Gk1256 672:Gk1256 664:Gk1256 605:Shanes 569:then? 557:nude? 291:Adam78 278:& 94:Cached 1155:rossb 1129:rossb 1100:IANAL 904:and 866:sento 862:onsen 547:Reigh 353:? -- 321:Reigh 274:, or 139:Reigh 16:< 1237:and 960:Thue 821:YMCA 351:GFDL 218:Laca 118:vs. 780:-- 559:Kaz 498:. — 335:aec 268:sex 1295:. 1259:. 1245:. 1102:-- 1083:) 1041:) 1018:) 976:) 953:) 926:) 908:-- 864:, 659:do 655:is 581:, 526:. 289:-- 216:-- 147:-- 76:→ 1092:) 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index