957:
The WP:FRINGE link you provided is excellent. Very helpful. Thanks. I think I can write something that would gain consensus as meeting
Knowledge (XXG) standards on this subject. Even though it would be helpful to have the earlier article, it doesn't really matter (although I will pursue a review
697:
It just seems to me given the other content on
Knowledge (XXG) that an article on exopolitics that meets Knowledge (XXG) standards whould be possible (not to say the old one met those standards). Otherwise the assumption regarding political relationships within the context of astrobiology and the
961:
A Google search for "percentage of americans who believe in ufos" results in over 700,000 hits on that exact phrase, numerous sources, including academic studies that indicate about 1/3rd of
Americans do. If you include God as an ET (which by definition s/he is) then it's 92 percent! And with
588:
Last month I put a delete review on the ACCA, a small "orthodox" church in
Knoxville TN, to which I used to belong, and at which I remember discussions regarding a fear of being deleted due to a lack of notoriety. Three priests, maybe 20 members total. All newspaper articles cited in the review
866:
I hold an earned PhD in Mass
Communications from Indiana University (1989), am a published author, have visited NASA's SETI project when it was housed at Ames, am one of four candidates on the ballot here in Utah's first district, for a seat in the US Congress, and have, I believe a legitimate
898:
I suggest that you continue your conversation with
Sandstein at his page. I can't see deleted contributions as I am no an admin, and therefore cannot comment on his reasoning other than what he has said. Moreover, there was not even an implication that you're a crank. Please
962:
Creation
Science, it occurs to me some may chose to try to relate to that Creator politically rather than through prayer or mystical means. Not to ramble on, but to say foremost THANKS for the link to WP:FRINGE. Spurred a lot of ideas.
530:
890:
yes. Perhaps you could be specific. None seem to directly relate to his the decline of the request to put the deleted article in a sandbox or to provide information on how to appeal his decline of this request.
981:
30:
921:
I shall, as you suggest, nonetheless assume that the administrator has some other good reason so far undisclosed for declining my request than including me as a "patent crank."
592:
By contrast the exopolitics conference in
Washington DC had 400+ attendees, and the keynote speaker was Dr. Edgar Mitchell, sixth man to walk on the moon, PhD from MIT . . .
992:
during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.
694:
What is the process for editing that redirect for exopolitics to one of the other articles above; or asking for a review of the decision to send it to the current article?
158:
639:
A search for exopolitics on wikipedia currently goes to a brittish alternative rock album. This seems at best unhelpful and at the very worst possibly malicious.
565:
616:
I am the
Libertarian candidate for the US Congress in Utah's first district and have included exopolitical issues in the campaign. Would like to mention that at:
769:
You do not have permission to edit pages, for the following reason: This page has been locked to prevent editing. You can view and copy the source of this page:
580:
The article has been deleted and (I believe the term is salted). Is it possible to get a copy of the prior to deletion article put into my sandbox at:
202:
918:" the only people to show interest in this topic so far are patent cranks, and I am not interested in dealing with them in any capacity any more. "
958:
of the decision first on the admin's talk page, and then, if needed in a dispute review by other admins if I understand the process correctly).
447:
67:
or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the
198:
598:
I am considering asking for a keep/delete decision review, but want to be sure I have the most accurate argument in place for that first.
381:
894:
Others might more directly relate to what I am sure he did must not have intended regarding what some might see as calling me a crank.
425:
176:
324:
698:
other subjects above, would have to be that said life is not capable of becoming conscious, or able to communicate with an others.
253:
180:
659:
it seems to me the redirect for those searching the term exopolitics might be better redirected there, or to the article on SETI
64:
627:
359:
354:
303:
954:
The bit you missed hit like a brick, but I'll drop it with the assumption the words "up till now" were inadvertently left out.
863:
the request was declined with a reply that seems to be in violation of
Knowledge (XXG) standards (was I just called a crank?)
285:
122:
34:
728:), and find the admin who deleted the page. Ask them if they can send you a copy. Issue 2 -- Not that I know of. Issue 3 --
439:
290:
214:
421:
315:
307:
231:
227:
189:
403:
363:
249:
210:
915:
With all respect The only reason offered for the decline of a request to put the deleted article into my sandbox was:
577:
I may want to work on a version of the deleted exopolitics article that would comply with Knowledge (XXG) standards.
376:
372:
236:
193:
942:. It should give you a good idea of what's going on, and then continue your conversation with Sandstein. Cheers. —
332:
218:
185:
328:
319:
116:
112:
989:
973:
967:
434:
430:
385:
980:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at
257:
223:
58:
790:
515:
506:
494:
476:
77:
42:
411:
407:
298:
281:
244:
153:
607:
Is there a deadline for seeking a deletion/keep decision review that after a keep decision was reached?
294:
108:
748:" part to give you the actual content of the redirect, so you can edit it yourself and re-target it.
997:
571:
I am seeking help with four issues. Feel free to assist with any one, any combination, or all four.
417:
350:
924:
822:
772:
749:
707:
939:
745:
741:
126:
536:
If you wish to contest the closure of this AFD as "Keep", you can start a discussion through the
443:
510:
489:
471:
72:
68:
368:
240:
148:
985:
977:
900:
737:
733:
701:
I am fairly new here and apologize for any misunderstandings or ignorance about the above.
537:
144:
993:
50:
620:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Joseph_Geddes_Buchman&action=edit&redlink=1
802:
740:. Issue 4 -- When you click on the redirect, it should say at the top "Redirected from
632:
Is it consistent with wikipedia policy for me to edit that page about my own campaign?
547:
628:
http://en.wikipedia.org/United_States_House_of_Representatives_elections_in_Utah,_2008
855:), and find the admin who deleted the page. Ask them if they can send you a copy."
800:
and ask for a change in the redirect. An admin will come and review your request.
71:
field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing!
797:
584:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Jbuchman/Exopolitics&action=edit
566:
Exopolitics article, Congressional Race, ACCA deletion (actually keep) review
542:
636:
ISSUE FOUR editing the exopolitics redirect to a more useful existing page
589:
discussion written by one of their members. But resulted in a speedy keep.
531:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Antiochian Catholic Church in America
686:
678:
613:
ISSUE THREE existing empty page about me, should I be the one to edit it?
852:
725:
766:
When I follow TenPoundHammer's direction regarding the redirect, I get:
858:
63:
1001:
947:
932:
908:
879:
830:
812:
780:
755:
715:
551:
521:
500:
482:
83:
982:
Knowledge (XXG):Miscellany for deletion/User:Jbuchman/Exopolitics
976:, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for
870:
Is there a process for a review of this administrator's decision?
57:
on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to
574:
ISSUE ONE process for rewriting the deleted exopolitics article
604:
ISSUE TWO timeline for a deletion/keep decision review request?
988:
with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of
654:
851:"Issue 1 -- check the deletion log (found by clicking on the
268:
95:
24:
724:
Issue 1 -- check the deletion log (found by clicking on the
645:
595:
Not complaining here, just seeking to learn the difference.
874:
Have you read the policies that Sandstein linked you to? —
867:
interest in, and ability to contribute to this subject.
37:
to this 💕. If you decide that you need help, check out
619:
583:
670:
903:when dealing with other editors on this project. —
662:
786:The page is protected. You will need to use the
704:Thanks in advance for any help you can offer.
687:http://en.wikipedia.org/Exopolitics_Institute
679:http://en.wikipedia.org/Extraterrestrial_life
8:
938:My mistake; I missed that bit. Please read
859:http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Sandstein
651:As there is a page here on Astrobiology,
154:Where to ask questions or make comments
488:I have replied to your message again.
505:I have replied to your message on my
7:
655:http://en.wikipedia.org/Astrobiology
646:http://en.wikipedia.org/Exopolitics
33:to Knowledge (XXG)! Thank you for
14:
848:I followed the advice above to:
470:I have replied to your message.
62:
20:
159:Request administrator attention
483:22:50, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
84:20:15, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
1:
796:template on the talk page of
671:http://en.wikipedia.org/CSETI
203:Biographies of living persons
91:
948:20:12, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
933:19:59, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
909:19:55, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
880:19:30, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
831:18:48, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
813:18:43, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
781:18:37, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
756:17:29, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
738:biographies of living people
716:17:22, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
675:or to Extraterrestrial_life
663:http://en.wikipedia.org/SETI
732:, but be very careful, see
552:18:47, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
522:13:25, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
501:20:37, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
228:Policy for non-free content
199:What Knowledge (XXG) is not
1017:
1002:14:03, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
145:Frequently asked questions
61:on talk pages by clicking
990:User:Jbuchman/Exopolitics
974:User:Jbuchman/Exopolitics
968:User:Jbuchman/Exopolitics
928:
826:
776:
711:
538:deletion review process
382:Pages needing attention
168:Policies and guidelines
984:and please be sure to
177:Neutral point of view
127:upload and use images
734:conflict of interest
624:that is linked from
254:Conflict of interest
181:No original research
360:The perfect article
304:No personal attacks
986:sign your comments
966:MfD nomination of
754:and his otters •
431:Join a WikiProject
355:Develop an article
351:Be bold in editing
35:your contributions
901:assume good faith
518:
497:
479:
463:
462:
459:
458:
455:
454:
291:Assume good faith
265:
264:
215:Three-revert rule
90:
89:
80:
41:below, ask me on
29:Hello, Jbuchman!
1008:
946:
907:
887:
878:
845:
809:
795:
789:
762:Help Me Question
752:
751:Ten Pound Hammer
561:
519:
517:
513:
498:
496:
492:
480:
478:
474:
440:Useful templates
342:Writing articles
316:Community Portal
308:No legal threats
286:Resolve disputes
269:
232:Image use policy
190:Reliable sources
117:Getting mentored
113:Our five pillars
96:
92:
81:
79:
75:
66:
55:
49:
25:
21:
1016:
1015:
1011:
1010:
1009:
1007:
1006:
1005:
971:
943:
904:
885:
875:
843:
841:
803:
793:
787:
764:
750:
569:
559:
534:
516:
511:
495:
490:
477:
472:
468:
396:
364:Manual of style
343:
282:Build consensus
274:
250:Deletion policy
211:Manual of Style
169:
137:
101:
100:Getting started
86:
78:
73:
53:
47:
19:
12:
11:
5:
1014:
1012:
970:
964:
953:
951:
950:
914:
912:
911:
883:
882:
840:
837:
835:
818:
816:
815:
763:
760:
759:
758:
720:
691:
683:or even this:
650:
635:
610:
601:
568:
563:
556:
533:
528:
527:
526:
525:
524:
467:
464:
461:
460:
457:
456:
453:
452:
451:
450:
437:
428:
414:
398:
397:
394:
391:
390:
389:
388:
379:
377:Disambiguation
366:
357:
345:
344:
341:
338:
337:
336:
335:
322:
312:
311:
310:
301:
288:
276:
275:
272:
266:
263:
262:
261:
260:
247:
237:External links
234:
221:
207:
206:
205:
196:
194:Citing sources
183:
171:
170:
167:
164:
163:
162:
161:
156:
151:
139:
138:
135:
132:
131:
130:
129:
119:
103:
102:
99:
88:
87:
59:sign your name
28:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1013:
1004:
1003:
999:
995:
991:
987:
983:
979:
975:
969:
965:
963:
959:
955:
949:
945:
941:
937:
936:
935:
934:
930:
926:
922:
919:
916:
910:
906:
902:
897:
896:
895:
892:
888:
881:
877:
873:
872:
871:
868:
864:
861:
860:
856:
854:
849:
846:
838:
836:
833:
832:
828:
824:
820:
814:
811:
810:
808:
807:
799:
792:
791:editprotected
785:
784:
783:
782:
778:
774:
770:
767:
761:
757:
753:
747:
744:". Click the
743:
739:
735:
731:
727:
723:
722:
721:
718:
717:
713:
709:
705:
702:
699:
695:
692:
689:
688:
684:
681:
680:
676:
673:
672:
668:
665:
664:
660:
657:
656:
652:
648:
647:
643:
640:
637:
633:
630:
629:
625:
622:
621:
617:
614:
611:
608:
605:
602:
599:
596:
593:
590:
586:
585:
581:
578:
575:
572:
567:
564:
562:
557:
554:
553:
549:
545:
544:
539:
532:
529:
523:
520:
514:
508:
504:
503:
502:
499:
493:
487:
486:
485:
484:
481:
475:
465:
449:
445:
441:
438:
436:
432:
429:
427:
423:
419:
415:
413:
409:
405:
402:
401:
400:
399:
395:Miscellaneous
393:
392:
387:
383:
380:
378:
374:
370:
367:
365:
361:
358:
356:
352:
349:
348:
347:
346:
340:
339:
334:
333:Mailing lists
330:
326:
323:
321:
317:
314:
313:
309:
305:
302:
300:
296:
292:
289:
287:
283:
280:
279:
278:
277:
273:The community
271:
270:
267:
259:
255:
251:
248:
246:
242:
238:
235:
233:
229:
225:
222:
220:
219:Sock puppetry
216:
212:
209:
208:
204:
200:
197:
195:
191:
187:
186:Verifiability
184:
182:
178:
175:
174:
173:
172:
166:
165:
160:
157:
155:
152:
150:
146:
143:
142:
141:
140:
134:
133:
128:
124:
120:
118:
114:
110:
107:
106:
105:
104:
98:
97:
94:
93:
85:
82:
76:
70:
65:
60:
56:
52:
44:
40:
36:
32:
27:
26:
23:
22:
16:
972:
960:
956:
952:
944:
923:
920:
917:
913:
905:
893:
889:
884:
876:
869:
865:
862:
857:
850:
847:
842:
834:
821:
817:
805:
804:
801:
771:
768:
765:
746:name of page
742:name of page
729:
719:
706:
703:
700:
696:
693:
690:
685:
682:
677:
674:
669:
666:
661:
658:
653:
649:
644:
641:
638:
634:
631:
626:
623:
618:
615:
612:
609:
606:
603:
600:
597:
594:
591:
587:
582:
579:
576:
573:
570:
558:
555:
541:
535:
469:
448:User scripts
329:IRC channels
320:Village pump
136:Getting help
69:edit summary
46:
43:my talk page
39:Getting Help
38:
798:exopolitics
512:Pie is good
491:Pie is good
473:Pie is good
435:Translation
386:Peer review
123:edit a page
74:Pie is good
45:, or place
994:Dougweller
886:{{helpme}}
844:{{helpme}}
560:{{helpme}}
416:Clean up:
412:Talk pages
408:User pages
373:Categories
258:Notability
224:Copyrights
109:A tutorial
940:WP:FRINGE
839:Now what?
806:Gtstricky
507:talk page
426:Vandalism
404:User name
299:Etiquette
245:Vandalism
978:deletion
925:Jbuchman
853:red link
823:Jbuchman
819:Thanks!
773:Jbuchman
726:red link
708:Jbuchman
325:Signpost
295:Civility
121:How to:
17:Welcome!
418:General
31:Welcome
51:helpme
730:Maybe
642:See:
466:Reply
444:Tools
369:Stubs
998:talk
929:talk
827:talk
777:talk
736:and
712:talk
548:talk
543:Cirt
422:Spam
241:Spam
149:Tips
667:or
1000:)
931:)
829:)
794:}}
788:{{
779:)
714:)
550:)
540:.
509:.
446:•
442:•
433:•
424:•
420:•
410:•
406:•
384:•
375:•
371:•
362:•
353:•
331:•
327:•
318:•
306:•
297:•
293:•
284:•
256:•
252:•
243:•
239:•
230:•
226:•
217:•
213:•
201:•
192:•
188:•
179:•
147:•
125:•
115:•
111:•
54:}}
48:{{
996:(
927:(
825:(
775:(
710:(
546:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
