Knowledge (XXG)

Welcome!

Hello, Jubair1985, and welcome to Knowledge (XXG)! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Waspur, may not conform to some of Knowledge (XXG)'s guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG)
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Knowledge (XXG):Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! - Vianello (Talk) 21:55, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Your article submission has been declined, and Knowledge (XXG) talk:Articles for creation/Washpur was not created. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer, and please feel free to resubmit once the issues have been addressed. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Knowledge (XXG)! Happysailor 21:15, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Www.jbivalley.com, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG) for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —KuyaBriBri 19:30, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Hi Jubair1985, you can find many images available to use on Knowledge (XXG) already uploaded by other contributors on Wikimedia Commons. The best way of uploading your own image or video is to go to Commons:Upload and follow the instructions. Uploaded files must be public domain or creative commons with attribution, see the upload page for links to detailed explanations of what these terms mean. Once uploaded to Commons, images can be shown in Knowledge (XXG) and any of the sister projects in the normal way (see Knowledge (XXG):Picture tutorial).

A simple standard guide is at Help:Files. If you need more help on getting a suitable photo in the first place, you may find Finding images tutorial helpful. Thanks, Fæ (talk) 06:50, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Jbivalley.com requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:47, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Knowledge (XXG) talk:Articles for creation/Washpur, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 12:55, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Hello Jubair1985. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Washpur.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Knowledge (XXG) talk:Articles for creation/Washpur}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Knowledge (XXG), and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 16:00, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Adding images to articles with no or few images is great, but can you please stop adding images to articles that already have plenty of images? Some of the articles you're adding more to already have images that extend below the text length of the article. --GraemeL 20:20, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Jubair Bin Iqbal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. RA0808 _contribs 20:48, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Please do not write or add to an article about yourself, as you apparently did at Jubair Bin Iqbal. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. 220 of 11:09, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Knowledge (XXG) accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Knowledge (XXG):Sockpuppet investigations/Jubairbiniqbal. Thank you. --220 of 11:37, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Sorry about that, accidental save while trying to find right message. Stuck through :-\ --220 of 11:55, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Hello, Jubair1985, welcome to Knowledge (XXG) and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Knowledge (XXG). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please remember to disclose these connections. --220 of 11:55, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

The other account that seems to have a strong connection with this one is Jubairbiniqbal (talk · contribs). --220 of 12:07, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Last week, I forget my password, and when I press recover button, then wiki show me 2 account and I thought, both are mine, and both are from same E mail. I do not know, why this happen. Basically I am trying to write article but I do not know properly, I am learning and writing. Hope, you will help me to provide proper guidelines.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Sabnam Faria requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://showbizspybd.blogspot.com.au/2013/07/SabnamFaria.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Knowledge (XXG) takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Knowledge (XXG) to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Knowledge (XXG):Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Knowledge (XXG):Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines. AlanS (talk) 11:46, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Naila Nayem, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.bdentertainers.com/naila-nayem/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Knowledge (XXG):Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:45, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Naila Nayem requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.bdentertainers.com/naila-nayem/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Knowledge (XXG) takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Knowledge (XXG) to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Knowledge (XXG):Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Knowledge (XXG):Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines. Vacation9 13:47, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Models of Bangladesh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 14:47, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi Jubair1985, I see you temporarily used another account, so I'll copy my message to your main account (here).

Thankyou for your enthusiasm to create new Knowledge (XXG) articles about Bangladeshi subjects. However, please bear in mind your articles will need reliable published sources to (a) prove that the information is true (b) prove that the person or subject is notable enough for this encyclopedia. Good sources are particularly important for articles about living people. Bear in mind that to prove someone (or something) is notable enough, you'll need to show they've had substantial coverage in independent sources like newspapers/websites, magazines or books. Unsourced articles may be partially or totally removed by other editors, either by speedy deletion (in the worst examples) or Articles for Deletion discussion. I hope you will be able to find good sources to support your articles! Sionk (talk) 18:29, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Thank you so much for your nice reply. I am trying ti improve my writing skill. I am watching video tutorial from youtube.

I blocked you for one month for sock puppetry. Then, when I came to your talk page, I saw the section above, and I unblocked you pending a discussion with you. Please explain why you've been using two accounts, this one, and User:Jubairbiniqbal. Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:26, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

As an observation, Jubair1985 explained on 9 July why they had used a second account. They haven't used the second account since. I've been following their recent additions (generally very poor articles about photographers) and would have raised the issue myself if they had continued to use two accounts. In my opinion, the explanation above seems quite genuine. Sionk (talk) 03:57, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

The article Din M Shibly has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Other than being a photographer who has had some photos published, article makes no claims to notability. Cited largely to his profile on his agent's website. No evidence of significant news coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sionk (talk) 07:06, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Sarker Protick requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sionk (talk) 17:37, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Naila Nayem, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Model. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Thank you,

A tag has been placed on Kazi Arefin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sionk (talk) 21:30, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Momo Mustafa is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Momo Mustafa until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rahat (Talk * Contributions) 07:51, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sarker Protick is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Sarker Protick until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rahat (Talk * Contributions) 07:55, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Farhana Rain is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Farhana Rain until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rahat (Talk * Contributions) 08:41, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

I am writing more details, Please caution. Thank you

A tag has been placed on Naila Nayem requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Rahat (Talk * Contributions) 08:44, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Welcome to Knowledge (XXG). Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Farhana Rain. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot I _Online 09:06, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Naila Nayem is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Naila Nayem (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 10:02, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Ergo Ventures Limited requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. //nepaxt 02:50, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ergo Ventures Limited is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Ergo Ventures Limited until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. //nepaxt 16:49, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Welcome to Knowledge (XXG). It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Ergo Ventures Limited, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Worldbruce (talk) 22:53, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bangladesh may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ]]
• default.aspx| archivedate= 12 May 2008 | deadurl= no}}</ref><ref>Golub, Stephen and Varma, Abir (February 2014 [http://www.swarthmore.edu/sites/default/files/assets/documents/user_profiles/sgolub1/

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:16, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello Jubair1985,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Pronob Ghosh for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Jodamaster (talk) 10:12, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Knowledge (XXG), as you did at Naila Nayem. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been or will be undone. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Mar11 (talk) 06:52, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Knowledge (XXG), as you did to Formaldehyde. It is considered spamming and Knowledge (XXG) is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Knowledge (XXG) uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Knowledge (XXG) will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Knowledge (XXG). Mar11 (talk) 06:54, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Naila Nayem. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Mar11 (talk) 06:54, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you insert a spam link to Knowledge (XXG) again, as you did at Naila Nayem, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Mar11 (talk) 06:57, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

I just find the information about Naila Naim in thtis link. http://pressbangladesh.org/top-ten-sex-girls-of-bangladesh/ So I add it. Wts the wrong here?

You were adding your own written article. Which is not acceptable per WP:SPAM. - Mar11 (talk) 13:41, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sarker Protick is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Sarker Protick (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ~ Moheen 12:30, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Jubair1985. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page আবির আবদুল্লাহ to Knowledge (XXG). While you have added the page to the English version of Knowledge (XXG), the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. Fabrictramp | talk to me 14:30, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

The article আবির আবদুল্লাহ has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced article that isn't in English.

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:40, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Knowledge (XXG). This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on বার-বি-কিউ requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Knowledge (XXG):Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Boleyn (talk) 06:27, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Hi Jubair1985.

I have looked at this article, and it seems to be about Barbecue. I note that there is no corresponding article on the Bengali language Knowledge (XXG), so I have moved it into your "userpace" as User:Jubair1985/বার-বি-কিউ, so you can improve it.

Please do note that the English language Knowledge (XXG) is the Knowledge (XXG) in the English language.

Please feel free to ask me any questions you may have about this.

Peter in Australia aka --Shirt58 (talk) 09:53, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on সৈয়দা রাবেয়া নাঈমা requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cahk (talk) 07:23, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Syeda Rabeya Naima requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cahk (talk) 07:25, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, রবিনসন আর-৬৬. First, thank you for your contribution; Knowledge (XXG) relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Robinson R66. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Knowledge (XXG). If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Robinson R66. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Knowledge (XXG) looks forward to your future contributions. _pseudonym Jake Brockman 07:23, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

Hello, Jubair1985. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Naila Nayem is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Naila Nayem (4th nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mar11 (talk) 00:46, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

The article Sadman Sameer has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Knowledge (XXG) policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cahk (talk) 08:33, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Hello Jubair1985,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Dhaka Regency Hotel & Resort for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

SamHolt6 (talk) 14:51, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Knowledge (XXG) as a "soapbox" are against Knowledge (XXG) policy and not permitted; Knowledge (XXG) articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Knowledge (XXG). Thank you.
Hello, Jubair1985. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Knowledge (XXG), you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• do your best to comply with Knowledge (XXG)'s content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.Deb (talk) 16:05, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

The article Mim Mantasha has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Knowledge (XXG) policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia 17:35, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Bangladeshi photographers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AFP (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

The article Paul David Barikder has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no indication of meeting WP:notability guidelines. There is no WP:significant coverage of him - just directory sites and listing of his name. Vague claim to an award does not identify a significant award or give a reference to his winning it.

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 10:12, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Shabnaz Sadia Emi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 6Packs (talk) 07:36, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Manob, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rock (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Manob is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Manob until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ~ Nahid 14:43, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for creating Nazifa Tushi.

A New Page Patroller Rosguill just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:

Please be aware that some of the cited sources are not reliable, such as IMDb and Youtube.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

_signed, Rosguill 16:13, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Jubair1985. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Please don't remove sourced material, as you did at International Bangladesh Hope School. If you think the material shouldn't be there, you can start a discussion at the article's Talkpage. This issue has already been extensively discussed there and the consensus is that the material should remain as it is relevant and well-sourced. KJP1 (talk) 17:30, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

You also need to be careful about Conflict of interest editing. I see you took the photograph of the Chairman. If you have a connection to the school, that needs to be declared and you need to edit in accordance with our conflict editing guidance. KJP1 (talk) 17:35, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Knowledge (XXG). This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:List of Bangladeshi fashion brands. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Flapjacktastic (talk) 15:57, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Jubair1985. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:List of Bangladeshi fashion brands.

In accordance with our policy that Knowledge (XXG) is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:41, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

I have cut down your user page because it a) was a fake article and b) contained personal info. Any new version should be mainly about what you do on Knowledge (XXG). — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:42, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kazi Riasat Alve is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Kazi Riasat Alve until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Worldbruce (talk) 23:49, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Hello. Your recent edit to List of newspapers in Bangladesh appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Knowledge (XXG)'s notability guideline. Thank you. —J. M. (talk) 18:37, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Afroza Parveen, requesting that it be deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Knowledge (XXG):FAQ/Organizations for more information.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 20:39, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Abir Abdullah requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.worldpressphoto.org/person/detail/604/abir-abdullah. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Knowledge (XXG) takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Knowledge (XXG) to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Knowledge (XXG):Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Knowledge (XXG):Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Knowledge (XXG)'s copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines. Captain Calm (talk) 07:11, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:27, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sadman Sameer is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Sadman Sameer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Worldbruce (talk) 05:53, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Syed Latif Hossain requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://pressbangladesh.org/syed-latif-hossain-photographer/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Knowledge (XXG) takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Knowledge (XXG) to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Knowledge (XXG):Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Knowledge (XXG):Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Knowledge (XXG)'s copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines. Storchy (talk) 15:16, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Maksuda Akhter Prioty. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because Need to be written as per Knowledge (XXG)'s standard. Also there are unsourced sections which need to be sourced first.. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 06:25, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Fabeha Monir, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, and currently has zero. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Knowledge (XXG)). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Knowledge (XXG)'s general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 11:58, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Vinegarymass911 were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Knowledge (XXG) article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Knowledge (XXG).

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Maksuda Akhter Prioty and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Knowledge (XXG)'s real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vinegarymass911 (talk) 20:26, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Jubair1985! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Knowledge (XXG) where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Vinegarymass911 (talk) 20:26, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Praseodymium-141 was:

The contributor seems to have a close connection (maybe an autobiography?) with the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fabeha Monir and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Knowledge (XXG)'s real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Pr {/_{Best page}} 18:52, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Hello. Your recent edit to Sirajganj appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Knowledge (XXG)'s notability guideline. Thank you. --Worldbruce (talk) 05:26, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Jubair1985. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Maksuda Akhter Prioty, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Knowledge (XXG). FireflyBot (talk) 21:06, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Jubair1985. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Fabeha Monir, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Knowledge (XXG). FireflyBot (talk) 19:03, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Jubair1985. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Maksuda Akhter Prioty".

In accordance with our policy that Knowledge (XXG) is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Knowledge (XXG), and happy editing. Liz 21:10, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Jubair1985. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Fabeha Monir".

In accordance with our policy that Knowledge (XXG) is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Knowledge (XXG), and happy editing. Liz 20:06, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Prianka Zaman, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Knowledge (XXG):FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Wikishovel (talk) 09:39, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I'm DaxServer. Knowledge (XXG) is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Zee Media Corporation seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — DaxServer (t·m·e·c) 19:24, 21 August 2024 (UTC)