User talk:LP-mn - Knowledge (XXG)

3036:

Until something is officially released, any preview copies of the book are considered to be unofficial copies of the book. In 99% of cases the review copy is usually the finished novel, but it's been known for books to have some things either left out or changed from the review copies. That's why the availability of advance copies do not really count as the book actually being "available" or "out" in the way that an official release would on its release date. As far as snippets go, the big problem was that you were linking to every snippet for the book. At some point it ceased being a link to a preview of a book and became borderline EL spam. You don't need links to every snippet of the book released on every site. That just bogs down the EL section, making it a bit unwieldy. Those sort of things are pretty unnecessary in the grand scheme of things and would become even more unnecessary when the final product is released. Overly long lists of external links should be avoided and as far as other articles allowing it, that doesn't really mean anything because there are a lot of articles that have issues with having too many external links. A long list of snippets or whatnot in the EL section might just mean that it hasn't been cleaned up yet. As far as to which sub-series the book is part of, go by what the publisher says on the final product or what the author says officially. If they don't specify, then just go with the overall basic series. The thing is, you can say "it can be argued", but in the end that's still technically one person's opinion on what part of the series or sub-series the book belongs in. A far better way of phrasing it would be "the book is the fourteenth novel set in the Honorverse in the main Honor Harrington series and brings in story lines and elements from the "Saganami Island" sub-series" or something to that extent. Until the author or publisher officially states that it's part of the sub-series, you have to go with the basics and just assume that it's a cross-over but is considered part of the main series. It's kind of like how several comic companies will have cross overs from their comics. For example, volume 13 of the Fables comic series deals heavily with a crossover from Jack of Fables, even going so far as to conclude one of the story arcs. Yet despite all of that, it's still considered to be part of the main Fables series and not technically a Jack of Fables volume. It brings in elements and story lines, but that doesn't make it a volume in the Jack of Fables series. It just makes it a crossover. In any case, this is sort of a moot discussion since released or no, SoF lacks coverage and should just be redirected at this time. When/if it gets more coverage, hopefully it'll clear up a lot of stuff and any of the minor stuff can be sourced by things other than other articles.

3018:

show that it's notable via in-depth coverage in independent and reliable sources, which do not exist at this point in time. Will it eventually? Probably, but it's not a guarantee. I've seen books by some of the big mainstream names that never really got enough coverage to warrant an entry, after all. I do want to state that forum posts are not usable as a reliable source, especially if they are in a closed forum that you have to sign up for in order to view. Some of the sources also linked to merchant sites, which are a big no-no for sourcing of any nature, whether it is trivial or major. I also noticed that the entry was more written from a fan's point of view and sort of seemed like a little bit of original research, which should also be avoided. The article also relied heavily on primary sources. The general rule of thumb with stuff like that is that if you don't see it written in something independent of the author, it probably doesn't need to be mentioned in the article and that you should never expand on what the author has written. That runs into original research if you theory that a book is "likely to be called" something. It's just better to avoid adding anything of that nature that can't be easily accessed or shown via sources because it's so easily questioned.

3436:

filling up the primary committee article. The primary article should be focused on the written history of the committee and it's actions, a list of current members, and important topics. Again, that's just my opinion. If you don't mind, I will take a stab and a compromise view on a "new members" section as I update committee articles. The committee rosters should be settled by now. Please don't take offense if you see these items deleted or changed. If you really think it adds to the article after seeing my suggestions, I'd welcome moving the discussion to

2662: 5055: 4159: 576: 4925: 4837: 4650: 4577: 4504: 952: 459: 839: 2480: 2377: 2308: 846: 3539:

later. With respect to seniority for prior service, footnotes where we can find sources are good. But since each Congress is a new congress, the committees are not continuing bodies from one Congress to the next. Seniority on a committee matters in determining seniority, but the resolution laying out seniority takes precedence over a previous congressional committee membership list.

832: 2239: 2048: 1674: 1170: 796: 4300: 3896: 853: 3977: 3736: 3279: 2597: 4724: 2181: 2105: 674:, and feel that you may have prematurely created it in the mainspace, as evidenced by the remaining copyediting editorial notes as well as the problems with nominations for deletion of the article. It may have been better to keep it as a sandbox until it was more mature as a draft article before releasing it "into the wild." 4372:

Redrose64: I consider myself to be an above average Knowledge (XXG) user or contributor, but NOWHERE near the level of "Guru" or "Editor". As a result, while I may know this, that or the other thing, there are some big gaps in my knowledge. Examples include the Move command, formatting titles, and

3423:

Thanks for your help keeping the committee articles up-to-date. I do have a few thoughts on formating, though. First, the current style has evolved over the last several years through consensus, and a lot of editors don't like to see wholesale changes. There's nothing wrong with being bold and adding

3260:

You're welcome! Articles with no pictures are just so dull and sad to me. I found it on his website nolan . house . gov, and it can be found in the "about" section on his website. Or if you click on the photo to make it larger there should be a direct link to the photo in the description box. I will

3017:

for this to have an article at this point in time and none of the sources on the article showed notability for the book. The thing about books, especially unreleased ones, is that they do not inherit notability by being written by a notable author or being part of an ongoing series. Each entry has to

2558:

deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can

2443:

756:

Piotrus-- (RESPONDING TO YOUR COMMENT -HERE-)-- I am willing to do the work of splitting up the sections (User:LP-mn/Sandbox). My (other) question to you was meant to be, will my work actually be USED? I don't want to do it only to find out that others object and it gets tossed out. I have my own

4376:

When the (original) Electrolux Ankarum Assistent web page was (in my opinion) vandalized to Electrolux Ankarsum Assistant, I had to react fast, and correct the misspelling of Assistent. BUT, at the same time I notice that _I_ had introduced a misspelling, and double-fixed it to Electrolux Ankarsrum

3538:

I agree there needs to be a separate footnote when someone leaves or is added to the committee at a later date. But we don't tend to do that with the initial committee resolutions at the beginning of a Congress. It would be best to treat the first list as static, and then footnote changes as needed

3431:

With respect to the "new members" section, some find too many headers in the bullet table list distracting. Simpler is better in my opinion, but consensus rules so I'm always open for a change. The main problem I have with adding that section directly to the bullet list is that committee membership

2747:

Thanks for cleaning the article up, but I don't think a wikitable is the best way of presenting the content. Maybe the devices can be split into different sections, and the content in each box can be written in prose form. Also, there is a template box for the LG phones, but I couldn't find one for

1232:

deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would would render it more in conformance with Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that

677:

One specific problem I see is that you appear to have drawn conclusions from the 1952 MOU with the Army's decisions about the A-10. The separation in time between date of the MOU and the time frame that the Army may have actually been able to remotely consider developing and flying an A-10B is over

3035:

Technically ARC availability is not counted as the book being released, regardless of how available the ARC is. A book can even be leaked onto the internet ala Midnight Sun, but that does not count as an official release. That is a leaked copy or an advance copy and not the official final product.

3515:

Thanks again for updating the committees. I've given your idea to highlight the new members of the committee some more thought. In most cases, there is no specific source for which members are new. Without a reliable source, we are left comparing the list between this Congress and the last, which

1872:

As memory serves, I believe that both of the ISBNs are for the same edition, one is the older 9 or 10 digit standard, and the other is the newer 13 digit equivalent. Both pieces of information came from the Baen promo page. If I'm wrong, please do correct me. Line break is a good idea. By my

701:

Other problems with the article are non-standard configuration of the article, the use of vague words ("Some people", "Other people"), and the articles inclusion of editorial notes that are best discussed on the article's talk page or made into text comments that are only available for editors to

1828:

That was a reply to your question on my talkpage "Hmmmmm... I wonder if it's possible to resurect (sp?) that old author article of mine that was deleted, and transfer it, and all the other content, over to the Honorverse Wikia... " The answer is that you can ask an admin to paste the text of any

718:

Thank you for your input. You are correct about the Sandbox issue. I can't turn back time, or I would have done so instead of "the wild" aspect of my actions. I'm still trying to find references to the some v other people. I know I've read about it. Perhaps I phrased the A-10B poorly. I'll

3435:

Long-term, my real goal is to create articles for each committee with a list of their members througout history, and the length of service for each member. I think something like that would be much more useful, along the lines of the various "list of senators from state X" articles, rather than

1308:

Excuse me, I think you've misunderstood. The article _IS_ now referenced. The banners now SHOULD be removed. There's no need for the 'disputed' or other banners. As the primary author, can _I_ be the one to take them down, even though I did not put them up in the first place? (While leaving the

1042:

It is, just in another form. I originally put it there the same way it was before, but then a few somebodies insisted it should look more templatelike. All that is missing are the references and the abbreviations for the books. Both were ommitted to keep the template from clutting up with less

697:

CAS remained the Air Force's mission (and responsibility) as specified in the Key West Agreement. So, regardless of any remaining thought on weight limits, it was the preserved idea that close air support was the Air Force's mission and responsibility that has prevented the Army developing any

1484:

I am hesitating because there is no current article, or any source anywhere telling us that this author is a different person. We have no evidence to say they are the same person, or that they are totally different people. If we make a DAB page, then we have to also make a page titles "Victor

4589:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

695: 4662:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

1513:. Apart from a few stylistic improvements, to give them the same look as other similar pages, this meant doing some cutting. I've noticed that often the less you say, the clearer you explain. In Knowledge (XXG) articles I see this on a daily basis, and I try to do so myself. 1344:

Obviously you have to be pretty sure of yourself before removing a template. But if you are sure then go ahead and remove the template. It would be advisable to add some explanation in the edit summary (e.g. removed "unreferenced" template since sources are now included).

4479:. When Steve Vogel gets his own article, we can set up a proper hatnote, or indeed a disambiguation page, pointing people to him. Until then, I don't think its necessary to mention this Vogel is not a Washington Post reporter; people are unlikely to get them confused. 2322:, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, file description page, file talk page, MediaWiki page, MediaWiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, user talk or special page from the main/article space. 2253:, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, file description page, file talk page, MediaWiki page, MediaWiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, user talk or special page from the main/article space. 1376:

here, although those in favor of "Non-CTL Circuit Breakers" might be unhappy about some things here. You could remove it, and if somebody would put it back, you can always invite him to the talk page to explain what constitutes the problem in his eyes.

4516:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

735:

I think this project is mariginally useful. That is meant as no offense: I just think that you may want to put your time towards improving some other Honorverse articles, some in dire need of help, instead of tweaking the alraedy pretty good list of

4185:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

3261:

try to search for the larger version of his Official Congressional Portrait, but with the 113th Congress just settling in it may be a while before it get uploaded to his personal House website, or the portraits get released on house . gov.

2560: 2445: 2409:, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the 1234: 3520:. In the cases where the committee has a press release or other source saying "here are the new members", I think we'll have to leave that information out. I'm also fine tuning the references as I mentioned to make things look cleaner. 2524:. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Knowledge (XXG). If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at 2329:, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you are fixing the redirect. If you think the redirect should be retained as is for some reason, you can request that 2260:, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you are fixing the redirect. If you think the redirect should be retained as is for some reason, you can request that 693:

As I had mentioned on the Army Aviation Branch talk page, other agreements with their related MOUs, specifically the Johnson-McConnell agreement of 1966, modified the Pace-Finletter agreement to be primarily about aircraft type and

2704: 3432:

changes throughout a Congress. We already need to keep the main list updated as items change, and a "new members" section, would be one more item we'd have to keep tabs on. I'd be OK putting them in a footnote, though.

2567:

the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the

3363: 2074: 2700: 4968: 4880: 4690: 4617: 4544: 3359: 4189:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

3597:

to highlight changes that need to be made to the articles from now on. Your notes and commentary are helpful, too, but should be placed on the article talk page or embeded in the article using hidden comment tags

3335: 1368:

The "howto" template could probably be removed. It is true that the article contains some information that could be used as implicit advice, but that is clearly by way of explaining the subject, not as a goal in

4436:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 3331: 5023:

August Klagstad (1866-1949) replicated Norwegian artist Axel Ender’s painting of the Resurrection for Mindekirken in Minneapolis." --- "The painting, which was located in the church at Molde" (Norway) ---

2548:(just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on 2433:(just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on 4952:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 4864:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 4674:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 4601:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 4528:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3475:

I don't think there's anything nefarious. The Budget committee simply hasn't organized yet, and I would expect anything until next week. The House GOP have been at their conference retreat this week.

2510:. First, thank you for your contribution; Knowledge (XXG) relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - 1468:

I know nothing about the man so I am no help there. Looking at his information, I too doubt he is the author. I wouldn't create the DAB page until we are sure that there are two different people.--

2975: 3641: 1688: 2971: 4938: 4850: 1569: 3637: 4346:

from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at

3938:

from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at

1713:

We work in pairs. You have a lot of editing power, creating new articles and adding additional information. I bring the finesse of Wikiepdia style and formatting. Let's go on this way.

4182: 1873:

interpretation of your quote (I've not read the standard/template), both versions would remain relevant, as they are for the same edition, just different ways of saying the same info.

30: 4739: 3109: 828:

The faster your respond, the better chance the article you created can be saved. There are several tools and other editors who can help you keep the page from being deleted forever:

2572:

and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Knowledge (XXG) looks forward to your future contributions.

818: 3105: 1355:

The article is now referenced, but the references are mostly from 1 source only, and not all paragraphs are referenced. It might be appropriate to change from "Unreferenced" to

3458:

I'm from Bismarck, but used to live in DC, hence my interest in congressional articles. I'm going to work on a sandbox to figure out alternative display options for committees.

2807: 2688: 3694: 3355: 874: 4351: 3943: 3198: 2803: 3690: 3425: 146: 1266:

Dependent on the degree of wrongness and how much of the article is influenced (just a statement, a section, the whole article) you could use the following templates:

3194: 4265:

tools, as having some issues to fix. Hi. I've had to copy-edit this article, since it included a lot of material that was not necessarily encyclopaedic - please see

1691:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. 3327: 3085: 2860: 4350:

to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at

3942:

to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at

3133: 3081: 2856: 4790:

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with

4224: 4171: 4084: 3864: 3811: 3704: 3651: 3319: 3182: 3129: 3069: 2911: 2870: 2817: 2714: 3606:). The committees are starting to officially organize, so all of the membership and subcommittee assignments are being dolled out in the next several days. 3854: 190: 4124:

Never include external links, either as entries or in descriptions. Disambiguation pages disambiguate Knowledge (XXG) articles, not the World-Wide Web.

1007:

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the

516:

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the

5118: 3748: 3424:

new formatting and ideas, but if there is an edit conflict it's best to take it to the project discussion page. There is a general style guide up at

2366: 1012: 591: 521: 3850: 2951: 2189: 594:; specifically, it has no content, other than external links, categories, "see also" sections, rephrasing of the title, and/or chat-like comments. 4074: 1146:

He has, fortunately I have a thick skin. But LP-mn should realize that outbursts like this can lead to a block. Some moderation would be good. --

3490:

01:19, 20 January 2013 (UTC)a list like this, I think it's sufficient for a single reference for the entire list feather than person-by-person.

2947: 1893:

OK, something is wierd here. I don't remember adding a second ISBN of the same number of digits, especially not for this book. See this site:

4276:

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on

2967: 4070: 3801: 2057:”, a clone of an article that you created, has been nominated for deletion by another editor. I created the clone after you mistakenly made “ 894:

which may support the page you created being kept. Acronyms in deletion debates are sometimes incorrectly used, or ignore rules or exceptions.

667:. The template marks the page for speedy deletion by an admin with the reason being it is your request because it is one of your user pages. 338: 4220: 4080: 3860: 3807: 3700: 3647: 3629: 3315: 3178: 3065: 2907: 2866: 2813: 2710: 4717: 4131: 1852:

that you added a second ISBN. Did you notice that the infobox shows only 1 (the second) of them? I added the second one with a <br /: -->

435: 4990: 4902: 4704: 4631: 4558: 4461: 2609: 2197: 981: 490: 186: 3797: 3222: 2927: 369: 3013:

Hi! I noticed that you created an entry for a book in the Honorverse series. I redirected it to the main series page because it's simply

2208:

tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the

59:

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the

3308:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

3171:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

3058:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

2900:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

977: 486: 4339: 3989: 3218: 2923: 2605: 933: 5122: 2529: 2036: 1527:

Also, I think that the article about the politician shouldn't be renamed, since it is clearly the primary article for this name. See

1016: 525: 413: 164: 4743: 312: 2601: 2209: 1323:

I added the "see" template, because you got mixed up. This comment was my answer to an earlier question of yours about the article

241: 168: 4323:, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Knowledge (XXG) has a feature that allows pages to be 3919:, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Knowledge (XXG) has a feature that allows pages to be 3908: 3101: 2675: 56: 2550: 2525: 1485:

Mitchell(Author)". What is the sense of all that work when we can just look up the book, and see the background on the author?--

347: 342: 291: 4986: 4898: 4700: 4627: 4554: 4457: 2137: 547:

I've removed the proposed deletion template from the article. If you wish to continue improving the article, please find some

4961: 4873: 4807: 4683: 4610: 4537: 4262: 4077:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3857:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3804:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3697:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3644:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2863:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2810:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2707:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2489: 2386: 610: 273: 110: 4484: 4312: 4217:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3312:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3175:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3062:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2904:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1576: 5110: 5066: 5044: 3478:

On your reference example, there's a simpler method to call the references using named refs. That's too many footnotes. For

959: 466: 427: 278: 202: 2544: 2506: 2473: 4731: 4308: 1977: 1613: 5114: 4270: 2637:

Uh, Noooo. As I understand it, they have the option of EITHER adding in the fire suppressant chemical OR straight water.

2054: 2040: 1639: 1193: 598: 409: 303: 295: 219: 215: 177: 4255: 3758:

and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on

2795: 4448:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

4347: 4175: 3939: 2297: 1684: 985: 898: 587: 494: 391: 351: 237: 198: 4973: 4885: 4695: 4622: 4549: 4453: 4304: 3900: 3682: 1985: 1506: 1224: 34: 4115: 3755: 3309: 3172: 3059: 2901: 2613: 2496: 2393: 2330: 2326: 2261: 2257: 2193: 2185: 364: 360: 224: 181: 4380:

Anyway, I didn't have the time to investigate the correct way, I just had to "Get R Done"; (I so hate that phrase!).

5136: 4209:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

4061:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

3904: 3841:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

3788:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

3681:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

3628:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

3190: 4331: 3927: 1609: 1197: 657:

To delete your unwanted or no longer used sandbox articles, replace all the text in the article with the template

320: 206: 173: 5097: 4480: 2516: 1854: 1687:. I do not think that this article satisfies Knowledge (XXG)'s criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at 1620: 873:

You can request a mentor to help explain to you all of the complex rules that editors use to get a page deleted:

2564: 2449: 1238: 606: 316: 307: 104: 100: 4311:

a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into

3907:

a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into

2626: 2435: 2184:

Welcome to Knowledge (XXG). Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the

1956:

Got the whole book in .pdf format. Send me an email, so that I may have your address, and I'll send it to you.

1788:

on your talkpage, and say that you want him to paste you the text of it on your talkpage for whatever purpose.

1328: 1090: 4949: 4861: 4671: 4598: 4525: 1680: 1510: 966:, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern: 510: 473:, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern: 422: 418: 373: 4398:

BTW, please note that _NOW_ I'm trying to use the Talk page re the Move command for the latest move proposal.

1601: 1565: 5062: 5048: 4000:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

1086: 937: 914: 671: 4747: 2414: 1189: 602: 245: 211: 50: 4289: 4277: 4195: 3077: 2848: 2429: 2402: 2370: 1981: 1699: 1218: 1177: 1163: 621: 5126: 4449: 2535:

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding

2133: 1020: 804: 529: 470: 395: 286: 269: 232: 141: 5131: 4166: 4150: 3569: 3125: 3041: 3023: 2753: 1649: 1645: 1490: 1473: 1458: 1246: 906: 605:. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our 4799: 4343: 4281: 3935: 1910: 910: 885: 282: 96: 1635: 1242: 4047: 2668: 2661: 2600:

Welcome to Knowledge (XXG)! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a

2129: 2023: 1057:

Ok. I'll put that back then. About the abbreviations. I personally liked the way it looked before...

1028: 757:

reasons why I'd like to make html links that get one closer to the relevant entry in the wiki list.

4932: 4844: 4658: 4585: 4512: 4494: 4425: 4416: 4127: 3765: 3291: 3014: 2757: 2213: 1188:

for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on

405: 4775: 4765: 4362: 3774: 3759: 2761: 2620: 2579: 2457: 2085: 2003: 1961: 1946: 1898: 1862: 1849: 1834: 1793: 1765: 1754: 1718: 1657: 1587: 1536: 1518: 1453:

A DAB page would be okay if we can prove that the author and politician are two different people.--

1411: 1382: 1359: 1339: 1299: 1261: 1136: 1098: 1076: 1062: 1048: 993: 708: 502: 4945: 4857: 4667: 4594: 4521: 4445: 4429: 3286:, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been 2315: 2301: 2204:

or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Knowledge (XXG) uses

1528: 1000:

notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on

679: 509:

notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on

114: 4335: 3931: 3610: 3543: 3524: 3494: 3482: 3462: 3444: 2749: 2221: 2141: 2125: 1782: 929: 640: 3934:

at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a

1113: 431: 2420:

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding

1203:

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding

5093: 5027: 4320: 4285: 4240: 4191: 4100: 3916: 3880: 3842: 3827: 3720: 3667: 3562:

The only Collins I see on the House Committee on Small Business is Chris Collins of New York.

3387: 3246: 3157: 2999: 2886: 2833: 2730: 2356: 2287: 2168: 2153: 2145: 1695: 1436: 1285: 1184:, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see 1001: 778: 743: 617: 60: 4957: 4869: 4679: 4606: 4533: 4441: 4433: 2201: 2117: 2113: 2096: 1631: 1373: 1185: 1008: 517: 356: 228: 136: 4980: 4892: 4818: 4139: 3564: 3407: 3037: 3019: 2318:, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under the 2249:, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under the 2062: 1938: 1906: 1894: 1486: 1469: 1454: 1273: 1151: 1121: 557: 537: 64: 5080: 4960:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 4953: 4872:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 4865: 4779: 4682:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 4675: 4609:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 4602: 4536:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 4529: 4444:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 4437: 4025:{{Collapse|1= <!-- Derived from the SOS website; candidates whose websites were either a 3437: 2569: 2521: 2410: 2406: 2319: 2250: 2109: 1181: 1109: 861: 719:

re-think that. Johnson-McConnel is news to me. I'll try to refer to it. Thank you again.

132: 4214: 4043: 3981: 3591: 3295: 3282:

Please refrain from making test edits in Knowledge (XXG) pages, such as those you made to

2943: 2339: 2270: 1729: 1426: 1208: 1024: 4266: 3517: 1732:

shortcut? I'm not comfortable lumping it in with the rest of the HHAx numbering system.

1348:

However in case of this article I would argue that not all templates need to be removed.

687: 683: 548: 478: 5012: 2612:

about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting

4355: 4062: 3846: 3793: 3770: 3740: 3287: 3229: 2799: 2574: 2453: 2348: 2279: 2079: 2027: 1999: 1992: 1957: 1942: 1858: 1830: 1789: 1761: 1714: 1653: 1624: 1583: 1532: 1514: 1407: 1378: 1295: 1132: 1094: 1072: 1058: 1044: 881:

wait for a mentor to respond to you before responding on the article for deletion page.

704: 661: 583: 399: 5079:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, pages may be

2405:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under

1579:

with what could lead to another deletion proposal, and that is already too much IMHO.

1545:

Fine. In that case though, we should add a link at the top once we do have the info.

1180:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under

976:

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Knowledge (XXG)'s

575: 552: 485:

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Knowledge (XXG)'s

4316: 4231: