1112:"not being here to build an encyclopedia".” A number of users wish to edit, but find it overly hard to adapt to conduct norms such as collaborative editing, avoiding personal attacks, or even some content policies such as not adding their own opinions in their edits Difficulty, in good faith, with conduct norms A number of users wish to edit, but find it overly hard to adapt to conduct norms such as collaborative editing, avoiding personal attacks, or even some content policies such as not adding their own opinions in their edits. These would be dealt with through guidance, simplified suggestions on how to contribute or reediting the content to the style and standards of Knowledge. In a small number of cases this may lead to a friendly block with warnings or even bans in some long term cases. Failure to adapt to a norm is not by itself, evidence that a user is not trying to contribute productively and some might require assistance so don't be inconsiderate. Expressing unpopular opinions – even extremely unpopular opinions in a non-disruptive manner Merely advocating and implementing changes to Knowledge articles or policies with reliable sources is allowed and even if these changes made are incompatible with certain Knowledge's policies and guidelines, it is not the same as not being here to build an encyclopedia. The disagreeing editor should take care to not violate Knowledge policies and guidelines such as not reverting due to a lack of consenus, getting the point, and civility in the course of challenging unpopular opinions. I have been actively here some one week trying to add information that I personally have been thinking is important. I clearly missed the point that when/if the subject is not commonly accepted you should 1) be very careful not to edit a page without discussing first about it and get consensus on some adding that you know might be controversial. I have been too hasty and too buzy just putting the additions straight to the wiki pages - without taking the time discussing it first. As I have realized and learned now is that there are two equally important things in Wiki: 1) wiki-community and 2) the encyclopedia. I missed here the community-part. But not any more. I realize that the community partis serious (and enjoyable) business too. And another thing. I also will not any more myself answer by provocativeness if I somehow find someone to behave towards me like that. Next time I can handle those kinds of situations along Wiki-standards and procedures, not changing my normally very polite style accordingly. If there is any questions, I will gladly answer. Yours faithfully, Mik-kiss
685:. Right now, you're at that 3 revert limit and will very probably end up blocked from editing if you continue to revert. You MUST discuss the issue on the article talk page and see if you can get consensus with the other editors before trying to make further changes. Continuing to push your version can be viewed as edit-warring, even if you don't revert more than 3 times in a 24 hour period, and can also lead to being blocked. There's a page
875:
1026:
956:
595:
1111:
I have been doing every adding in Good Faith. I red through the advice about blocking reasons and unblocking advise and I found primarly these sections that suit to my Good Faith Case: ”Differences that arise where both users are in good faith hoping to improve the project should not be mistaken for
562:
To
Antandrus: there is not any link to the truth movement. SO that must be allowed there to maintain credibility and allowing any scientific critique like critique from 3000 scientific architects and engineers. At the moment there are "references" from Tv-shows allowed so wiki can not deny credible
722:
Hi
Slatersteven and Ravensfire. Thank you for your advice. I now will be less eager to put information straight to the wiki-pages and be more in the talk-page. Hopefully wiki does not promote censorship and is willing to give information that is relevant to that/any specific page theme. I am a bit
522:
You're free to believe such positions, however, Knowledge is meant to be a work of scholarship that relies on reliable sources. For such information to be added, it would have to come from the mainstream scientific communities first. In other words, the scientists would have to be won over first.
846:
You'll have to obtain consensus for that on that article's talk page. It's not an article I'm very familiar with, but the youtube video is a primary and self-published source (and has been discussed there before); if you can find a secondary source writing about it, this would likely help for
495:
Hi! I will definitely consider the points mentioned here. But what to do to correct untrue information that is wrongly referenced from an article. I think that at least mistakes of this kind must be corrected i.e. the source must be fererred as it is in the source
723:
suprised that warranted critique is not allowed in these pages because in scientific sphere it is critique that is a must to make any theory either stronger or forse it to be changed - little or completely in some cases. Thank you again for your words. Mik-kiss
606:
were not added to the bottom of the page. New discussion page messages and topics should always be added to the bottom. Your message may have been moved. In the future you can use the "New section" link in the top right. For more details see the
813:
So lets get
William back to the Wiki-page about him self or explain to me what more evidence is needed to state that William experienced explosions and is not satisfied that his testimony has been rejected in the States, but not elsewhere (in
703:
Please don't revert again, trying to force in your link. You will end up blocked from editing. Discuss the issue on the talk page and use the dispute resolution steps, but realize that if consensus is against you, you need to respect that.
847:
inclusion. To sign posts, please use four tildes (~~~~), that will include the signature as well as a timestamp. Messages can also be indented by using colons (:) as sentence prefix for threading. I hope this helps, —
32:. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help one get the most out of Knowledge. If you have any questions you can ask me on
923:
810:
In the source video(s) William
Rodriguez himself talks live about what he himself has wittnessed and experenced. That the most relable source referencing about what William Rodriguez has said/is saying.
696:. Right on wrong, the consensus for mainstream sources is contrary to the ideas of the AE911 group and articles on Knowledge must be written with that in mind. Besides the FRINGE page, the
58:
or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are interested in learning more about contributing, you might want to consider being "
154:
1180:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
753:
We are not a lab for the purposes of carrying out sociological experiments, nor are articles a place to make test edits, that is what the sandbox is for.
467:
462:(i.e. a "mainstream conspiracy" vs other conspiracy thories). While it's acceptable to wikilink to articles inline where relevant (such as these:
974:
198:
67:
681:
Rather than a template, I'm leaving a more personal note. Knowledge has a policy against edit-warring and excessive reverts on a page - it's at
926:. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
1066:
206:
549:
And one other quick note -- there is already a link in the article to our page on the conspiracies (see the cultural influence section).
1165:
981:
343:
365:
352:
692:
In general, I agree with the reasons others have reverted you thus far. It's a self-serving link and the phrasing is contrary to
379:
194:
172:
1061:
832:
738:
643:
608:
599:
578:
511:
249:
189:
29:
470:), external links to such should only exist as the official site on their specific article. They are not reliable sources (
55:
347:
299:
1142:
again. You are welcome to request another unblock, and a different admin will review that. You will want to explain what
317:
303:
122:
419:
286:
210:
1038:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
904:
375:
277:
223:
219:
176:
126:
1039:
969:
964:
619:
245:
1033:
401:
397:
228:
185:
28:
and a belated welcome to
Knowledge! I see that you've already been around awhile and wanted to thank you for
325:
240:
181:
1080:
853:
786:
758:
667:
484:
459:
427:
321:
312:
281:
116:
83:
59:
33:
361:
356:
63:
1146:
is in your own words, and explain why the sources you were using were inappropriate under that policy.
892:
820:
726:
713:
631:
615:
566:
528:
499:
253:
215:
49:
1113:
1044:
940:
824:
730:
635:
570:
553:
541:
503:
463:
451:
410:
308:
294:
236:
149:
290:
112:
537:
I came here to say the same thing
Harizotoh9 did. We use reliable sources, not fringe. Thanks,
848:
781:
754:
663:
659:
479:
371:
79:
73:
1174:
987:
919:
881:
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.
693:
455:
931:
Also, continuing to promote conspiracy or fringe theories about 9/11 will likely lead to a
1151:
915:
908:
900:
896:
706:
603:
524:
423:
474:) for Knowledge. If you would like to assess if a source is usable, that can be done at
936:
932:
697:
550:
538:
414:
405:
232:
45:
874:
66:
to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click
1004:
998:
773:
682:
475:
144:
1143:
1139:
1135:
777:
686:
471:
895:. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called
1147:
955:
776:
which is a good guide on evaluating if a source is reliable for
Knowledge (
613:
Please also be sure to sign any "contribution" you may make to a Talk page.
1017:
980:
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the
70:
for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to
984:, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:
594:
807:"a primary source can be a person with direct knowledge of a situation"
54:
1155:
1121:
1009:
944:
859:
836:
792:
762:
742:
717:
671:
647:
623:
582:
556:
544:
532:
515:
490:
87:
804:"Knowledge articles should be based on reliable, published sources"
658:
You appear to be edit warring over a number of pages, please read
887:
imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
264:
99:
19:
1024:
954:
1162:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
689:
on
Knowledge that you may find some helpful resources.
1182:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
1094:
1090:
1084:
1075:
1071:
1057:
1053:
1049:
1032:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
602:to Knowledge. Your recent talk page comments on
48:and ask your question there. Please remember to
1138:or that we can be sure you'll never engage in
973:from editing because it appears that you are
677:Edit-warring and exceeding the 3 revert limit
8:
563:critique of the official 911-account either.
62:" by a more experienced editor or joining a
914:For additional information, please see the
899:is in effect: any administrator may impose
801:"Proper sourcing always depends on context"
911:, when making edits related to the topic.
818:
724:
629:
564:
497:
1134:This does not convince me you understand
468:Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth
891:You have recently shown interest in the
478:(and searching its archives). Thanks, —
628:Thank you for your advise. BR Mik-kiss
150:Where to ask questions or make comments
903:on editors who do not strictly follow
458:theories. Articles should also avoid
450:Please note that Knowledge is not for
7:
916:guidance on discretionary sanctions
14:
975:not here to build an encyclopedia
873:
798:I red throug the IRS-information
593:
53:
15:
155:Request administrator attention
1:
1156:11:03, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
199:Biographies of living persons
117:The five pillars of Knowledge
95:
768:Identifying reliable sources
700:page may be helpful to you.
1122:23:02, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
1036:, who declined the request.
1010:22:10, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
945:09:38, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
860:02:57, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
837:02:28, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
793:02:05, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
763:19:21, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
743:17:28, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
718:16:51, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
672:16:49, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
648:16:45, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
624:16:37, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
583:15:51, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
557:15:36, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
545:15:33, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
533:05:06, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
516:03:57, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
491:03:20, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
220:Policy for non-free content
1198:
909:page-specific restrictions
207:Simplified Manual of Style
145:Frequently Asked Questions
52:on talk pages by clicking
1166:guide to appealing blocks
982:guide to appealing blocks
1117:
828:
734:
639:
574:
507:
88:20:44, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
920:Arbitration Committee's
897:discretionary sanctions
353:Pages needing attention
348:Help develop an article
164:Policies and Guidelines
1029:
959:
598:Hi, and thank you for
1081:change block settings
1028:
992:Your reason here ~~~~
958:
687:on dispute resolution
195:What Knowledge is not
173:Neutral point of view
905:Knowledge's policies
893:September 11 attacks
609:talk page guidelines
366:Translating articles
282:Adopt-a-user program
250:Conflict of interest
190:No original research
464:9/11 Truth movement
300:No personal attacks
72:always fill in the
1030:
960:
600:your contributions
362:Join a WikiProject
344:Be bold in editing
304:Resolving disputes
113:Knowledge Tutorial
30:your contributions
1008:
839:
823:comment added by
745:
729:comment added by
650:
634:comment added by
585:
569:comment added by
518:
502:comment added by
443:
442:
439:
438:
435:
434:
287:Assume good faith
261:
260:
211:Three-revert rule
94:
93:
78:. Happy editing!
1189:
1179:
1173:
1100:
1098:
1087:
1069:
1067:deleted contribs
1027:
1021:
1002:
995:
877:
856:
851:
789:
784:
709:
597:
487:
482:
446:Fringe promotion
420:Useful templates
278:Community Portal
265:
224:Image use policy
177:Reliable sources
100:
96:
57:
42:
41:
20:
16:
1197:
1196:
1192:
1191:
1190:
1188:
1187:
1186:
1185:
1177:
1171:
1170:, then use the
1159:
1125:
1088:
1078:
1064:
1047:
1040:blocking policy
1025:
1015:
1013:
1012:
985:
978:
952:
929:
928:
878:
870:
854:
849:
787:
782:
770:
751:
707:
679:
656:
616:David J Johnson
604:User talk:MONGO
591:
485:
480:
460:WP:FALSEBALANCE
448:
390:
336:
309:Build consensus
270:
246:Deletion policy
165:
137:
127:upload an image
105:
104:Getting Started
90:
39:
38:
12:
11:
5:
1195:
1193:
1160:
1132:
1128:Decline reason
1109:
1105:Request reason
1102:
1023:
979:
962:You have been
961:
953:
951:
948:
879:
872:
871:
869:
866:
865:
864:
863:
862:
841:
840:
815:
811:
808:
805:
802:
799:
769:
766:
750:
747:
678:
675:
655:
652:
590:
587:
560:
559:
547:
535:
447:
444:
441:
440:
437:
436:
433:
432:
431:
430:
417:
408:
392:
391:
388:
385:
384:
383:
382:
368:
359:
350:
338:
337:
334:
331:
330:
329:
328:
315:
306:
297:
284:
272:
271:
268:
262:
259:
258:
257:
256:
243:
229:External links
226:
213:
203:
202:
201:
192:
186:Citing sources
179:
167:
166:
163:
160:
159:
158:
157:
152:
147:
139:
138:
135:
132:
131:
130:
129:
119:
107:
106:
103:
92:
91:
50:sign your name
23:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1194:
1184:
1183:
1176:
1169:
1167:
1158:
1157:
1153:
1149:
1145:
1141:
1137:
1131:
1129:
1124:
1123:
1119:
1115:
1108:
1106:
1101:
1096:
1092:
1086:
1082:
1077:
1073:
1068:
1063:
1059:
1058:global blocks
1055:
1054:active blocks
1051:
1046:
1041:
1037:
1035:
1034:administrator
1022:
1019:
1011:
1006:
1001:
1000:
993:
989:
983:
976:
972:
971:
967:
966:
957:
949:
947:
946:
942:
938:
934:
927:
925:
921:
917:
912:
910:
906:
902:
898:
894:
889:
888:
886:
876:
867:
861:
857:
852:
845:
844:
843:
842:
838:
834:
830:
826:
822:
816:
812:
809:
806:
803:
800:
797:
796:
795:
794:
790:
785:
780:). Thanks, —
779:
775:
767:
765:
764:
760:
756:
748:
746:
744:
740:
736:
732:
728:
720:
719:
715:
711:
710:
701:
699:
695:
690:
688:
684:
676:
674:
673:
669:
665:
661:
653:
651:
649:
645:
641:
637:
633:
626:
625:
621:
617:
614:
610:
605:
601:
596:
588:
586:
584:
580:
576:
572:
568:
558:
555:
552:
548:
546:
543:
540:
536:
534:
530:
526:
521:
520:
519:
517:
513:
509:
505:
501:
493:
492:
488:
483:
477:
473:
469:
465:
461:
457:
453:
445:
429:
425:
421:
418:
416:
412:
409:
407:
403:
399:
396:
395:
394:
393:
389:Miscellaneous
387:
386:
381:
377:
373:
370:Cleaning up:
369:
367:
363:
360:
358:
354:
351:
349:
345:
342:
341:
340:
339:
333:
332:
327:
326:Mailing lists
323:
319:
316:
314:
310:
307:
305:
301:
298:
296:
292:
288:
285:
283:
279:
276:
275:
274:
273:
269:The Community
267:
266:
263:
255:
251:
247:
244:
242:
241:Sock puppetry
238:
234:
230:
227:
225:
221:
217:
214:
212:
208:
205:
204:
200:
196:
193:
191:
187:
183:
182:Verifiability
180:
178:
174:
171:
170:
169:
168:
162:
161:
156:
153:
151:
148:
146:
143:
142:
141:
140:
134:
133:
128:
124:
120:
118:
114:
111:
110:
109:
108:
102:
101:
98:
97:
89:
85:
81:
77:
75:
69:
65:
61:
56:
51:
47:
43:
35:
31:
27:
22:
21:
18:
17:
1181:
1163:
1161:
1133:
1127:
1126:
1110:
1104:
1103:
1076:creation log
1043:
1031:
1014:
997:
991:
970:indefinitely
968:
963:
930:
913:
890:
884:
882:
880:
819:— Preceding
772:I recommend
771:
755:Slatersteven
752:
725:— Preceding
721:
705:
702:
691:
680:
664:Slatersteven
657:
630:— Preceding
627:
612:
592:
565:— Preceding
561:
498:— Preceding
494:
452:WP:PROMOTION
449:
428:User scripts
402:Disambiguity
335:Things to do
322:IRC channels
313:Village pump
136:Getting Help
80:Red Director
74:edit summary
71:
37:
34:my talk page
25:
950:August 2018
935:or a block
589:August 2018
357:Peer review
123:edit a page
64:WikiProject
36:, or place
1072:filter log
749:Test edits
708:Ravensfire
660:wp:editwar
525:Harizotoh9
415:Talk pages
411:User pages
398:Categories
254:Notability
216:Copyrights
40:{{helpme}}
1164:read the
1091:checkuser
1050:block log
941:pingĂł miĂł
937:Galobtter
933:topic ban
922:decision
907:, or any
901:sanctions
694:WP:FRINGE
662:and stop.
551:Antandrus
539:Antandrus
456:WP:FRINGE
380:Vandalism
295:Etiquette
237:Vandalism
46:talk page
1114:Mik-kiss
1062:contribs
1045:Mik-kiss
990:|reason=
918:and the
883:It does
833:contribs
825:Mik-kiss
821:unsigned
817:Mik-kiss
739:contribs
731:Mik-kiss
727:unsigned
654:edit war
644:contribs
636:Mik-kiss
632:unsigned
579:contribs
571:Mik-kiss
567:unsigned
512:contribs
504:Mik-kiss
500:unsigned
318:Signpost
291:Civility
121:How to:
44:on your
26:Mik-kiss
1175:unblock
1085:unblock
988:unblock
965:blocked
855:Neonate
814:Spain).
788:Neonate
698:WP:NPOV
496:itself.
486:Neonate
372:General
60:adopted
24:Hello,
774:WP:IRS
683:WP:3RR
554:(talk)
542:(talk)
476:WP:RSN
1168:first
1148:Yamla
1144:WP:RS
1140:WP:EW
1136:WP:RS
1005:Help!
868:Alert
850:Paleo
783:Paleo
778:WP:RS
481:Paleo
472:WP:RS
424:Tools
406:Stubs
76:field
1152:talk
1118:talk
977:.
924:here
829:talk
759:talk
735:talk
714:talk
668:talk
640:talk
620:talk
575:talk
529:talk
508:talk
466:and
376:Spam
233:Spam
84:talk
68:here
1095:log
1042:).
1018:Guy
999:Guy
996:.
885:not
454:of
1178:}}
1172:{{
1154:)
1130::
1120:)
1107::
1089:•
1083:•
1079:•
1074:•
1070:•
1065:•
1060:•
1056:•
1052:•
994:}}
986:{{
943:)
858:–
835:)
831:•
791:–
761:)
741:)
737:•
716:)
670:)
646:)
642:•
622:)
611:.
581:)
577:•
531:)
514:)
510:•
489:–
426:•
422:•
413:•
404:•
400:•
378:•
374:•
364:•
355:•
346:•
324:•
320:•
311:•
302:•
293:•
289:•
280:•
252:•
248:•
239:•
235:•
231:•
222:•
218:•
209:•
197:•
188:•
184:•
175:•
125:•
115:•
86:)
1150:(
1116:(
1099:)
1097:)
1093:(
1048:(
1020::
1016:@
1007:)
1003:(
939:(
827:(
757:(
733:(
712:(
666:(
638:(
618:(
573:(
527:(
506:(
82:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
