Knowledge

User talk:Monkeymox

Source 📝

726: 833: 468:
get the impression that you were affected on your visit in what I would call the right way. Go ahead and edit the article - it is only fair to say that your changes will ring immediate bells on my and many other users' screens; but if the edits are sensible, good and encyclopedic, as I feel from this converation they will be, then that's fine. Go to it.Happy wikying. --
456:
Hi there; this article is in fact semi-protected, which means only that editors with very new accounts (<4days) cannot edit it. Wait a short time, and you will find that you can. This article is one of a small number of sensitive articles, so please be careful as to what you add to it. A number of
595:
Hello. I am sorry you thought my edit to the latter article linking to the former was vandalism. Did it really look like vandalism? It was not; it was a standard disambiguation, which I put in place due to the similarity of their names, and because I got the latter first in a web search when I was
467:
No problem. I tend to feel that anyone who has been to Auschwitz, as I have, must either feel the effect or else have the empathy of a turtle. I was not trying to put you off; it is just that this article is one of the most heavily vandalised pages in wikipedia, hence the permanent semi-protect. I
694:
experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a
767: 574:
You either tagged this with something like TWINKLE or at the same moment as I was deleting it, which is why it looks like you created the article. Don't worry, you're not a vandal for doing this. You don't have to reply to this message, either. Regards,
757: 606:
All I deleted was 'Note: Richmond upon Thames is also know as Richmond, Surrey' which is irrelevant to the article. That kind of information belongs in the Richmond article. I can't see why you thought there was vandalism.
777: 772: 485:
Hi, I undid your edit and then realized that you had nominated it for deletion yourself. The way I understand it, once it is put up for AfD, it has to run its full course, ie, someone has to close it and
762: 30: 550:. When there are multiple consecutive instances of vandalism, you have to save the last good version of the page (in this case, the first revert you did to the page); 784: 647: 641: 631: 142: 186: 690:
Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most
894: 683:
is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group
711: 699: 334: 431: 798: 365: 56: 898: 707: 409: 182: 160: 34: 237: 177: 596:
searching for the former. I have now put disambiguations at the top of each to the other. I have edited a great deal here.
343: 338: 287: 747: 450: 308: 269: 106: 886: 844: 822: 423: 274: 198: 59:
or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to
890: 635:, but we are unsure as to which editors are still active on the project. Your name has therefore been moved to a " 405: 299: 291: 215: 164: 639:" list. If you still consider yourself an active WikiProject Harry Potter editor, please move your name from the 387: 347: 233: 194: 679:
In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the
576: 360: 356: 220: 173: 790:
Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.
804:(user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings. 680: 316: 202: 169: 659:
wish to be considered a member of the WikiProject, leave your name where it is and it will be moved to the
725: 312: 303: 100: 608: 597: 589: 469: 458: 418: 414: 369: 787:
that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)
873: 568: 241: 207: 50: 902: 391: 282: 265: 228: 137: 504:
I am not that familiar with the AfD process either. Maybe you can ask someone who knows, like an
278: 211: 96: 869: 809: 547: 523: 401: 62: 110: 663:
section. If you wish to make a clean break with the Project you may move your name to the
840: 826: 505: 427: 768:"Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages 745:
message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the
395: 352: 224: 132: 68: 910: 856: 529: 490:, the tag on the article can be removed. Please let me know if I am wrong. Thanks. - 128: 628: 585: 555: 539: 509: 491: 855:
While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, pages may be
479: 753:
that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:
546:
20:10, 14 May 2007 (UTC) And another thing, please check the history page of
67:. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! 879:
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing
906: 655:
to your userpage, if you haven't done so already. Conversely, if you do
562: 498: 914: 815: 715: 611: 600: 579: 554:. Hope thats not too confusing.. Do ask me if there s anything else. - 526:
by 207.144.223.66? The rules are the same for IPs and registered users
516: 472: 461: 71: 55: 724: 49:
on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to
721:
RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey
794:
Note: You received this message because you have transcluded
252: 83: 24: 831: 37:
to this 💕. If you decide that you need help, check out
897:
process can result in deletion without discussion, and
785:
more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general
698:
Find out more about this exiting new user right now at
862:
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
706:
and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying.
758:
Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
538:because they might be used by a lot of users. - 528:as far as the warning messages and reporting at 695:dynamic, supportive environment for your work. 508:. Apart from that, keep up the good work. :) - 8: 778:Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list 457:us guard it as a lioness guards her young!-- 626:Hi there. Your username is listed on the 773:Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android 763:Editor-focused central editing dashboard 41:below, ask me on my talk page, or place 868:notice, but please explain why in your 138:Where to ask questions or make comments 7: 735:Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers! 681:current system we introduced in 2011 857:deleted for any of several reasons 847:because of the following concern: 618:WikiProject Harry Potter roll-call 552:do not just undo the previous edit 14: 54: 20: 651:list. You may also wish to add 143:Request administrator attention 749:2016 Community Wishlist Survey 536:blocked for a shorter duration 1: 716:04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC) 187:Biographies of living persons 101:The five pillars of Knowledge 79: 915:04:36, 2 December 2019 (UTC) 816:01:12, 8 December 2016 (UTC) 672:New deal for page patrollers 451:Auschwitz concentration camp 33:to Knowledge! Thank you for 901:allows discussion to reach 882:{{proposed deletion/dated}} 865:{{proposed deletion/dated}} 930: 893:exist. In particular, the 708:MediaWiki message delivery 522:Did you mean the edits to 129:Frequently asked questions 53:on talk pages by clicking 887:proposed deletion process 799:User wikipedia/RC Patrol 653:{{User WP Harry Potter}} 629:WikiProject Harry Potter 612:10:50, 16 May 2007 (UTC) 601:10:45, 16 May 2007 (UTC) 580:21:52, 14 May 2007 (UTC) 563:20:14, 14 May 2007 (UTC) 517:18:36, 14 May 2007 (UTC) 499:18:24, 14 May 2007 (UTC) 473:22:05, 13 May 2007 (UTC) 462:17:37, 13 May 2007 (UTC) 72:15:16, 11 May 2007 (UTC) 874:the article's talk page 366:Pages needing attention 152:Policies and guidelines 853: 836: 729: 667:section. Many thanks. 899:articles for deletion 849: 845:proposed for deletion 835: 728: 661:Inactive Contributors 590:Walter Leigh Rayfield 183:What Knowledge is not 161:Neutral point of view 111:upload and use images 642:Potentially inactive 637:potentially inactive 238:Conflict of interest 178:No original research 783:Further, there are 648:Active Contributors 344:The perfect article 288:No personal attacks 61:always fill in the 891:deletion processes 837: 730: 702:New Page Reviewers 687:has been created. 668: 665:Known to have left 534:. Usually IPs are 415:Join a WikiProject 339:Develop an article 335:Be bold in editing 97:Knowledge tutorial 35:your contributions 823:Proposed deletion 818: 805: 685:New Page Reviewer 632:participants list 625: 548:Battle of Dunkirk 524:Battle of Dunkirk 447: 446: 443: 442: 439: 438: 275:Assume good faith 249: 248: 199:Three-revert rule 78: 77: 29:Hello Monkeymox! 921: 884: 883: 867: 866: 834: 813: 803: 797: 793: 750: 654: 470:Anthony.bradbury 459:Anthony.bradbury 424:Useful templates 326:Writing articles 300:Community Portal 292:No legal threats 270:Resolve disputes 253: 216:Image use policy 165:Reliable sources 84: 80: 58: 47: 46: 25: 21: 929: 928: 924: 923: 922: 920: 919: 918: 895:speedy deletion 881: 880: 864: 863: 841:Duchy of Olasko 832: 830: 827:Duchy of Olasko 801: 795: 748: 738: 723: 674: 669: 652: 620: 593: 572: 569:Nickie Mckinney 483: 478: 454: 380: 348:Manual of style 327: 266:Build consensus 258: 234:Deletion policy 195:Manual of Style 153: 121: 89: 88:Getting started 74: 44: 43: 19: 12: 11: 5: 927: 925: 905:for deletion. 885:will stop the 829: 820: 808:Best regards, 781: 780: 775: 770: 765: 760: 732: 722: 719: 676:Hi Monkeymox, 673: 670: 624: 622: 619: 616: 615: 614: 609:195.137.30.238 598:195.137.30.238 592: 583: 577:(aeropagitica) 571: 566: 520: 519: 482: 477: 476: 475: 453: 448: 445: 444: 441: 440: 437: 436: 435: 434: 421: 412: 398: 382: 381: 378: 375: 374: 373: 372: 363: 361:Disambiguation 350: 341: 329: 328: 325: 322: 321: 320: 319: 306: 296: 295: 294: 285: 272: 260: 259: 256: 250: 247: 246: 245: 244: 231: 221:External links 218: 205: 191: 190: 189: 180: 174:Citing sources 167: 155: 154: 151: 148: 147: 146: 145: 140: 135: 123: 122: 119: 116: 115: 114: 113: 103: 91: 90: 87: 76: 75: 51:sign your name 28: 18: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 926: 917: 916: 912: 908: 904: 900: 896: 892: 888: 877: 875: 871: 860: 858: 852: 848: 846: 842: 828: 824: 821: 819: 817: 811: 806: 800: 791: 788: 786: 779: 776: 774: 771: 769: 766: 764: 761: 759: 756: 755: 754: 752: 751: 744: 743:one-time-only 739: 737: 736: 727: 720: 718: 717: 713: 709: 705: 704: 703: 696: 693: 688: 686: 682: 677: 671: 666: 662: 658: 650: 649: 644: 643: 638: 634: 633: 630: 623: 617: 613: 610: 605: 604: 603: 602: 599: 591: 587: 584: 582: 581: 578: 570: 567: 565: 564: 561: 560: 559: 553: 549: 545: 544: 543: 537: 533: 532:are concerned 531: 525: 518: 515: 514: 513: 507: 503: 502: 501: 500: 497: 496: 495: 489: 481: 474: 471: 466: 465: 464: 463: 460: 452: 449: 433: 429: 425: 422: 420: 416: 413: 411: 407: 403: 399: 397: 393: 389: 386: 385: 384: 383: 379:Miscellaneous 377: 376: 371: 367: 364: 362: 358: 354: 351: 349: 345: 342: 340: 336: 333: 332: 331: 330: 324: 323: 318: 317:Mailing lists 314: 310: 307: 305: 301: 298: 297: 293: 289: 286: 284: 280: 276: 273: 271: 267: 264: 263: 262: 261: 257:The community 255: 254: 251: 243: 239: 235: 232: 230: 226: 222: 219: 217: 213: 209: 206: 204: 203:Sock puppetry 200: 196: 193: 192: 188: 184: 181: 179: 175: 171: 170:Verifiability 168: 166: 162: 159: 158: 157: 156: 150: 149: 144: 141: 139: 136: 134: 130: 127: 126: 125: 124: 118: 117: 112: 108: 104: 102: 98: 95: 94: 93: 92: 86: 85: 82: 81: 73: 70: 66: 64: 57: 52: 48: 40: 36: 32: 27: 26: 23: 22: 16: 889:, but other 878: 870:edit summary 861: 854: 850: 839:The article 838: 810:Stevietheman 807: 792: 789: 782: 746: 742: 740: 734: 733: 731: 701: 700: 697: 691: 689: 684: 678: 675: 664: 660: 656: 646: 645:list to the 640: 636: 627: 621: 594: 586:Walter Leigh 573: 557: 556: 551: 541: 540: 535: 527: 521: 511: 510: 493: 492: 487: 484: 455: 432:User scripts 313:IRC channels 304:Village pump 120:Getting help 63:edit summary 60: 42: 39:Getting Help 38: 814:Delivered: 419:Translation 370:Peer review 107:edit a page 741:This is a 400:Clean up: 396:Talk pages 392:User pages 357:Categories 242:Notability 208:Copyrights 45:{{helpme}} 903:consensus 851:Fails GNG 843:has been 480:Mvomeka'a 410:Vandalism 388:User name 283:Etiquette 229:Vandalism 69:Eaomatrix 309:Signpost 279:Civility 212:Fair use 105:How to: 17:Welcome! 692:current 558:TwoOars 542:TwoOars 512:TwoOars 494:TwoOars 402:General 31:Welcome 872:or on 530:WP:AIV 506:admin 428:Tools 353:Stubs 65:field 911:talk 712:talk 488:then 406:Spam 225:Spam 133:Tips 907:TTN 825:of 657:not 913:) 876:. 859:. 812:— 802:}} 796:{{ 714:) 430:• 426:• 417:• 408:- 404:- 394:• 390:• 368:• 359:• 355:• 346:• 337:• 315:• 311:• 302:• 290:• 281:• 277:• 268:• 240:• 236:• 227:• 223:• 214:• 210:• 201:• 197:• 185:• 176:• 172:• 163:• 131:• 109:• 99:• 909:( 710:( 588:/

Index

Welcome
your contributions
sign your name

edit summary
Eaomatrix
15:16, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
Knowledge tutorial
The five pillars of Knowledge
edit a page
upload and use images
Frequently asked questions
Tips
Where to ask questions or make comments
Request administrator attention
Neutral point of view
Reliable sources
Verifiability
Citing sources
No original research
What Knowledge is not
Biographies of living persons
Manual of Style
Three-revert rule
Sock puppetry
Copyrights
Fair use
Image use policy
External links
Spam

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.