Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Allegations of apartheid (fourth nomination) - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

192:
This article is a synthesis and OR because it brings together topics that no other author or source have brought together in order to create an argument. The title "allegations of apartheid" is highly misleading since, in most cases, not even the sources cited allege that actual apartheid is being
104: 205:
bordering on original research. I and a few others have attempted to rewrite the article to make it acceptable, it was previously little more than a laundry list of unconnected allegations, but the fundamental problems with the article remain so it should be deleted.
193:
practised by the countries named. Rather, in a number of instances, the term apartheid is used as an analogy or rhetorical flourish rather than as an actual allegation. For instance there is no actual allegation that "water apartheid" is a form of the
197:
or is a form of legalized racial segregation. If it's necessary to have a page that lists all the article in which the term "apartheid" is used then a disambiguation page should be created as suggested by User:Kbolino in his edit comment here
94: 89: 99: 84: 53: 78: 159: 132: 127: 136: 119: 239: 223: 210: 60: 56:. Perhaps when the arb com is finished we can line up all the allegations of apartheid together and delete them all, but now is not that time. 171: 17: 182: 186: 123: 257: 36: 220: 207: 256:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
115: 66: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
52:
has not been sustained by the committee as no result has come out of the process. For current status, see:
201:
but spinning an article out of a series of unconnected instances in which a term is employed is pure
57: 194: 202: 178: 174: 167: 49: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
232: 48:
until the arb com is done with their work this is premature. The claimed violation of
236: 153: 105:
Articles for deletion/Allegations of apartheid in Slovakia and the Czech Republic
181:. It served as the mother for a series of WP:POINT articles such as 95:
Articles for deletion/Allegations of apartheid (second nomination)
90:
Articles for deletion/Allegations of apartheid (fourth nomination)
100:
Articles for deletion/Allegations of apartheid (third nomination)
85:
Articles for deletion/Allegations of apartheid (fifth nomination)
54:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration/Allegations of apartheid
250:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
199: 149: 145: 141: 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 173:for evidence) and it remains a violation of both 260:). No further edits should be made to this page. 189:etc which have since been deleted or renamed. 79:Articles for deletion/Allegations of apartheid 8: 75: 166:The recreation of this article was a 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 73: 24: 183:Allegations of Chinese apartheid 187:Allegations of French apartheid 1: 233:violating the prime directive 240:21:00, 19 October 2007 (UTC) 224:20:53, 19 October 2007 (UTC) 211:20:13, 19 October 2007 (UTC) 61:21:34, 19 October 2007 (UTC) 277: 221:Lothar of the Hill People 208:Lothar of the Hill People 253:Please do not modify it. 116:Allegations of apartheid 67:Allegations of apartheid 32:Please do not modify it. 72:AfDs for this article: 195:crime of apartheid 268: 255: 157: 139: 46:Procedural close 34: 276: 275: 271: 270: 269: 267: 266: 265: 264: 258:deletion review 251: 170:violation (See 130: 114: 111: 109: 81: 70: 44:The result was 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 274: 272: 263: 262: 245: 243: 242: 226: 164: 163: 110: 108: 107: 102: 97: 92: 87: 82: 77: 74: 71: 69: 64: 58:Carlossuarez46 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 273: 261: 259: 254: 248: 247: 246: 241: 238: 234: 230: 227: 225: 222: 218: 215: 214: 213: 212: 209: 204: 200: 196: 190: 188: 184: 180: 176: 172: 169: 161: 155: 151: 147: 143: 138: 134: 129: 125: 121: 117: 113: 112: 106: 103: 101: 98: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 68: 65: 63: 62: 59: 55: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 252: 249: 244: 228: 216: 191: 165: 45: 43: 31: 28: 219:as mover. 203:WP:SYNTH 179:WP:SYNTH 175:WP:POINT 168:WP:POINT 160:View log 50:WP:POINT 237:Bearian 133:protect 128:history 229:Delete 217:Delete 137:delete 154:views 146:watch 142:links 16:< 177:and 150:logs 124:talk 120:edit 231:as 158:– ( 235:. 185:, 152:| 148:| 144:| 140:| 135:| 131:| 126:| 122:| 162:) 156:) 118:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
WP:POINT
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration/Allegations of apartheid
Carlossuarez46
21:34, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Allegations of apartheid
Articles for deletion/Allegations of apartheid
Articles for deletion/Allegations of apartheid (fifth nomination)
Articles for deletion/Allegations of apartheid (fourth nomination)
Articles for deletion/Allegations of apartheid (second nomination)
Articles for deletion/Allegations of apartheid (third nomination)
Articles for deletion/Allegations of apartheid in Slovakia and the Czech Republic
Allegations of apartheid
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
WP:POINT

WP:POINT
WP:SYNTH
Allegations of Chinese apartheid
Allegations of French apartheid

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.