Knowledge (XXG)

< Knowledge (XXG):Featured list candidates‎ | Featured log

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Knowledge (XXG) talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 23:32, 30 March 2018 (UTC) .

---

Nominator(s): Yashthepunisher (talk) 09:44, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

My second National Film Award nomination. I feel its a well written and well sourced list worthy of promotion. As always, all the constructive comments and feedbacks are welcomed. Yashthepunisher (talk) 09:44, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Resolved comments from Jmnbqb (talk) 20:33, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

;Comments from Jmnbqb Full date is needed in date range in infobox per MOS:DATERANGE Done Is there a reason for the "/-" in the infobox after the reward? Removed I believe recipient should be plural in "Ray and Adoor Gopalakrishnan are the most frequent recipient..." Done Run-on sentence: " Mrinal Sen has been awarded four times, he is also the only..." Split As of what year is "The most recent recipient is Rajesh Mapuskar..." referring to? Mentioned Why is there a key? The reason for the year can be explained in the lead. Plus it's just explained again in the table header note. Removed Not sure if first names are surnames with Indians, but if not sort by last name per WP:NAMESORT. If first names are surnames, switch lead paragraph to refer to Satyajit Ray as Satyajit after his mention. The first names are not surnames in India. Can you redo the sizing of the table or add more pictures? There's a lot of white space. I don't see any issue with that. I have modelled it on the existing National Film Award FLs. There seems to only be one language in each entry, so change language(s) to language Done Change Refs to Ref Done Why does the table title include showing "role(s)" when the table has "recipient(s)"? Fixed In note A, "till" should be "until" Done Remove capitalization in "The" in Note B Done Reference 26 needs to be reformatted Replaced Overall good job! If you get time, I could use a review on one of my listed FLCs. Jmnbqb (talk) 13:41, 13 March 2018 (UTC) Jmnbqb Thanks for your comments, I have hopefully resolved them all. I will review your nominations soon. Yashthepunisher (talk) 17:10, 13 March 2018 (UTC) Yashthepunisher Couple things still. The names still need to be sorted by last name and there's still a redundancy with having a note and a key saying the same thing. Also you have a new problem with not having an MOS:ENDASH in your infobox date range. Jmnbqb (talk) 17:21, 13 March 2018 (UTC) Jmnbqb All done this time, hopefully. Please have a look. Yashthepunisher (talk) 14:31, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

• Support – Also need to add alt text to images per MOS:ACCESS. Other than that looks good! Jmnbqb (talk) 20:33, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for your comments and support. Yashthepunisher (talk) 06:10, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Resolved comments from BeatlesLedTV (talk) 14:44, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

;Comments from BeatlesLedTV "Satyajit Ray has won the honour maximum number of times, six." – shouldn't it be "honor THE maximum"? I also think "with six" would read better than just "six". Tweaked. I think the year & ref cols would look better centered Hope its fine now. Fixed it. The infobox subheader looks weird. It and the "awarded for" basically say the same thing Removed With the year col, you seem to have the years represent the year of film the ceremony represents rather than the year the ceremony takes place. I think the years should mark when the ceremonies take place, especially since the lead says "as of 2017" while the table and infobox both say it was last awarded in 2016. Just seems a little inconsistent. (I'm also sure other award lists mark the year of the ceremony rather than the year in film) Tweaked the lead sentence. Actually most of the existing NFA FLs use the same format. The emphasis is on the "year" the event happens. Table heading doesn't need a period Removed. Check out this dead link Replaced. Looks good. Great job! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 22:28, 18 March 2018 (UTC) BeatlesLedTV I have hopefully resolved your comments. Please have a look. Yashthepunisher (talk) 12:43, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

• Support – Looks good. Great job! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 14:44, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for your comments and support :) Yashthepunisher (talk) 15:05, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

• Support-Great job. My only comment is that Ref2 is dead. Just replace it and the list will be good to go — FR 06:40, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

FR, done as suggested, thanks for the comment and support. Yashthepunisher (talk) 06:57, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

• You might want to check that "deadurl" field as yes if the link is dead as was the case of the first ref. Make sure all the links have been checked.

Archived.

• Ref. 1 says that the awards were instituted in 1968, the article says it was 1967. Does ref. 2 say 1968? I haven't been able to look through the entire document so it would be helpful if you tell me where to look.

The reference says: "Separate awards for artistes and technicians were instituted in 1968 for the films of 1967."

• Why does the url field in ref. 2 have the archived url? Also, is this ref of any use, I haven't been through the entire document?

Removed, seemed unnecessary to me as well.

• Ref. 3 mentions Mukherjee, but does not say that the awards are presented by President in general.

Fixed.

• Wikilink Outlook, Business Standard, The Asian Age and the likes.

Done

• You might also want to be consistent with wiklinks in refs. You link International Film Festival of India on multiple occasions, but the rest only once. Either link only on first occurrence or link everywhere.

Fixed. Yashthepunisher (talk) 14:22, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Going through the contents of the table, VedantTalk 09:27, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Further:

• I have to say Yash, I am fairly confused on how you've given​ the titles to the refs. 58th National Awards has a unique instance of the year mentioned​ in the title and none of the other do; the 64th National Awards pdf has the year in the title but the ref does not. You'll have to help me out here.

The title of ref's are consistent now. Most of the references have year mentioned in them, but some don't have that. I don't think its necessary in any way.

• Also, I still think that the "deadurl" field in the refs issue has not been addressed. Most of the "original" URLs are dead and should say yes in their​respective "deadurl" field as it is in the last ref. In that scenario the archived URL comes first which is ideal.

Replaced dead urls.

They are all available and working in the archived forms otherwise. VedantTalk 16:03, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Numerounovedant I have hopefully resolved your comments now. Have a look. Yashthepunisher (talk) 13:06, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Everything looks good, but you've misunderstood me on the last point again. You do not have to change the URL with archived url as you did here. All you need to do is this, just replace the no with a yes. Other than that, consider the source review done. Good luck getting this promoted! VedantTalk 14:22, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Numerounovedant Done as suggested. Rest of the links are working. Is their anything else? Yashthepunisher (talk) 12:11, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Yes. that should be it then. Consider this done. VedantTalk 05:25, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for the review Vedant. Yashthepunisher (talk) 06:21, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Source review passed above, thanks Numerounovedant! Made one tweak- the date formats were mixed between DMY and MDY. Promoting. --PresN 21:45, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Knowledge (XXG) talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 23:32, 30 March 2018 (UTC) .

---

Nominator(s): Kosack (talk) 17:32, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because I have brought the page up to the same standard as the recently promoted Welsh hat-tricks list to meet the FL criteria. Kosack (talk) 17:32, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Resolved comments from Jmnbqb (talk) 20:33, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Comments from Jmnbqb In the first paragraph, "...partition of the country in 1921, prior to this..." is a run-on sentence The linked article Ireland national football team (1882–1950) cites that the partition was in 1920, while the lead cites 1921, so I'm not sure which one is correct In the second paragraph, I would insert "the" to make it "...Keane's third at the international level..." In the second paragraph, I don't know what you mean when you say "... the most hat-tricks scored for the side." In the third paragraph, I think it should be "has" instead of "have" in "The Republic of Ireland have conceded..." You can wiki link The Independent, The Irish Independent, The Irish Times, and others in your references Overall it looks good! If you get a chance, I would appreciate a review on one of my listed FLCs. Thanks! Jmnbqb (talk) 19:22, 25 February 2018 (UTC) @Jmnbqb: Thanks for the review. I've implemented the changes listed above. In regards to the partition date issue, the Partition of Ireland article states it was in 1921. Although the act was proposed in 1920, it did not take effect until 1921 so I think that's where the confusion might be coming from in the other page. Kosack (talk) 20:16, 25 February 2018 (UTC) @Kosack: The "hat-tricks scored for the side" segment is the same. It might just be me, but I don't know what that's referencing. Is it the record for most goals for the Republic of Ireland? Also there's a few more references that could be wiki linked such as references 6, 15, 16, and 27. Jmnbqb (talk) 20:23, 25 February 2018 (UTC) @Jmnbqb: No the player has scored more hat-tricks for the side than any other player. I may be wrong but I was under the impression that we only link a reference source once otherwise it's a bit of an overlink situation? Kosack (talk) 20:28, 25 February 2018 (UTC) @Kosack: Okay. I've always linked the publisher every time, but it's not a big deal so I'll go ahead and support the nomination. Jmnbqb (talk) 20:33, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Support – Good job! Jmnbqb (talk) 20:33, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 12:59, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Comments Could link Irish Free State. This is quite a radical comment, but since you cover about half of the individuals in the lead, and the lead is rather sparse, you could probably cover all the members of the first table in brief in the lead? "most amount of hat-tricks " delete "amount of". Could clarify that no one individual player has ever scored more than three goals against Ireland in a match. Could note that all games in which Rep of Ireland score a hat-trick bar one resulted in a victory. Competition column sorts strangely. I'd make it chronological, or by tournament, but certainly not what it is now... Ref -> Ref. Adolf Huber has an Italian wiki page so you could use Adolf Huber? You may need to add a hidden sort key so it sorts by Huber though. "Ireland - International" - spaced hyphen should be an en-dash. Check ref 14 and ref 18 as well. I have to say I prefer to see authors as last, first, rather than first last. The Rambling Man (talk) 12:17, 2 March 2018 (UTC) @The Rambling Man: Thanks for the review, I think I've addressed the issues raised above. Kosack (talk) 15:12, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

• Support my concerns addressed. The Rambling Man (talk) 12:59, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
• My only concern is this bit: "The Republic of Ireland has conceded nine hat-tricks during their history", in which the same subject is treated as both single and plural, all within the same sentence..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:52, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

@ChrisTheDude: Thanks for reviewing, I've fixed that sentence now. Kosack (talk) 12:02, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

• Support - can't see any issues now........... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:14, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Source review passed, promoting. --PresN 21:32, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Knowledge (XXG) talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 23:30, 30 March 2018 (UTC) .

---

Nominator(s): MWright96 (talk) 10:46, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

This list concerns the ESPY Award for those who partake in boxing and mixed martial arts competitions. This is one of many ESPY Awards that were introduced in the 2000s and is the official replacement for the Best Boxer ESPY Award. Your comments, suggestions and support are most welcomed and I will endeavour to address them in a timely manner. MWright96 (talk)

BeatlesLedTV (talk) 17:20, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

;Comments from BeatlesLedTV Numbers less than nine are spelt out per MOS:NUMS There's a random comma in front of ref 7 in the table Ref → Ref. "Floyd Mayweather Jr. who defeated the incumbent"; comma after Jr. "As of 2017, Boxers" – boxers shouldn't be capitalized Don't think the word "fans" needs to be linked but if it does it's currently a redirect Made this small edit for you (per MOS:DASH) That's all I got. Great job to you! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 23:31, 10 February 2018 (UTC) @BeatlesLedTV: Many thanks for your comments. I have made the necessary changes. MWright96 (talk) 06:55, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

• Support – All good for me. Great job! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 17:20, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
• Oppose – This list includes columns identifying nationality, weight class and sanctioning body or league. The intro says the award is given "irrespective of nationality, gender, weight class, or sanctioning body or league". So, if the Nominating Committee is specifically and directly saying those factors are irrelevant, they probably shouldn't be listed here as relevant factors. If the award is truly given to the person "adjudged to be the best in a given calendar year" wouldn't something like their win-loss record or # contests, or titles held be more relevant? maclean (talk) 04:28, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  • @Maclean25: Personally I am not convinced that such a proposal of replacing the mentioned factors with a win-loss record would enhance the list's value. MWright96 (talk) 12:38, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
  • @Maclean25: Update: the section of text you questioned has now been removed as I was unable to locate any explicit evidence to support that statement. MWright96 (talk) 18:28, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
    • I still don't follow why nationality is given such weight. The winners and nominees are all listed by nationality (it looks like they are representing their country) and there is a "Winners by nationality" summary table in a separate section. With respect to receiving this award, why is their nationality more relevant than their achievements of that given year? maclean (talk) 05:10, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
      • @Maclean25: I wouldn't say that the nationality of the boxers is more important than their achievements but having the nationality after their name is common with other lists of this type like Laureus World Sports Award for Action Sportsperson of the Year. MWright96 (talk) 14:13, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
      • I would say it was about presenting information that our readers would be interested to see, and in no way veers into the "UNDUE" territory. The nationality of winners of sporting contests is practically commonplace as to make it trivial yet expected in these records. It's taking LEAD a long way down a requirement creep path to oppose based on the fact that items are included in the list which the lead prose says are not part of the selection criteria. If a huge amount of analysis of the nationalities was made and some kind of conclusions drawn then we'd be in different territory but simply noting it and summarising it is not a problem at all. We don't know what achievements were considered by the awarding jury so to add a synopsis of their various successes would be pure WP:OR. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:00, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
        • Is the logic that, in an article about the 'Best Fighter' in a given year, the belief is that the reader is interested in what the winner's (and nominee's) nationality was in that given year? I just see that as WP:INDISCRIMINATE (note that WP:UNDUE is about neutrality and no one has questioned that). The references don't give any weight to it — only Pacquiao's references mention anything about nationality. Ranking the nationalities, a quality that the references only off-handedly mention about two of the two dozen people, seems kind of random. The references provided just summarize some of the winners' activities that led to winning the award. —maclean (talk) 08:34, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
          • That's certainly part of it. Most award sites make note of the nationality of the recipients, it's perfectly encyclopedic information. The Rambling Man (talk) 15:09, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Resolved comments from Ianblair23 (talk) 21:17, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

:Hi MWright96, fantastic job with this list. Please find my comments below: who defeated Wilson Reis to defend his title change to UFC title and link to List of UFC champions#Flyweight Championship The list of nominees in 2009 needs to be placed in alphabetical order. I have performed my usual check on links and refs and have just edited the article directly. I have also created a navbox for the award and added this to the article. I have conducted a source review as well on every ref and I am happy. Can confirm that every ref in table covers both the winner and the nominees. As for the oppose by Maclean25 above, I agree with TRM with that including the nationality of fighters is perfectly acceptable as was the case for the Laureus World Sports Awards FLCs. Cheers – Ianblair23 (talk) 06:12, 25 March 2018 (UTC) @Ianblair23: Thanks for your comments and for your other edits. The necessary changes have been made. MWright96 (talk)

• Support – Great job MWright96, looking forward to reviewing the remainder of the series. Cheers – Ianblair23 (talk) 21:20, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 18:07, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Comments " a record five more times" would be better as "a total of six times" or something similar. McGregor and Rousey have the same record so should be in alphabetical order. Both See also links are formal award titles but both redirect, so write them out as per their actual names. The Rambling Man (talk) 12:42, 27 March 2018 (UTC) @The Rambling Man: Many thanks for your comments above. All of them have been actioned. MWright96 (talk) 15:04, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

• Support my concerns addressed. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:07, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
• Query - why is Demetrious Johnson listed under "Multiple winners and nominees" when he has only one win and no additional nominations? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:44, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
  • No reason in particular. So I have removed him from the list. MWright96 (talk) 20:31, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
    • Cool. With that resolved I am happy to support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:21, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Source review passed; promoting. While I see that there's one opposer, in looking over their arguments I follow the logic but I'm not convinced. Yes, the ESPYs do not limit nominees/winners on nationality/weight class/etc. Knowledge (XXG), on the other hand, is not the ESPYs- not only that, but the list is not attempting to split the table up by any criteria, but simply adding those details as metadata to the winners/nominees. Readers are (or potentially are) intersted in seeing that the award is given most often to X weight class or nationality, even if the award itself does not place restrictions on those. It's certainly possible to go overboard on that sort of "extra" information, but in this case the extra details are relatively standard for lists like these, and don't get to be too much. Indeed, if they were omitted, the list would literally just be a list of 5 or so names per year, as the same logic against nationality would remove even the pictures (and props for using a different picture for each year per winner).

Tl;dr: directors don't just count votes, therefore, promotion. --PresN 21:29, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Knowledge (XXG) talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 23:33, 26 March 2018 (UTC) .

---

Nominator(s): Jmnbqb (talk) 17:54, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

My first list nominated has support and issues have been addressed, so I'm putting this list in the pipeline. I have added all alumni from Category:Missouri University of Science and Technology alumni and have done research to add a few more to the category/list. Information is lacking for early alumni, but I've done my best to add correct information. Jmnbqb (talk) 17:54, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Resolved comments from Courcelles (talk) 08:07, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

*"The most recognizable name on the list is..." The anecdote about Dorsey is fine, making this claim about recognizability appears to be OR. Fixed. Be careful about CITESPAM, there's nothing we're getting from three sources about Raymer (for instance) that we couldn't get in 1 or 2. I went through and removed redundant references (entries have a max of 2). Ref 28 (and 84) does not strike me as reliable. Removed. Ref 68 needs an ISBN. Fixed. Courcelles (talk) 05:27, 24 January 2018 (UTC) Courcelles Comments are addressed. Jmnbqb (talk) 06:04, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

• Support I consider it comprehensive enough for a dynamic list to be promoted, people will always be adding more, so more care will be needed to maintain the star than in most lists. Courcelles (talk) 17:49, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 07:33, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Comments Opening sentence is a little silly really, I know we need to avoid "this is a list of" but you're just repeating the title of the list twice, using different words. Reworded "The list of notable Missouri University" nope. Maybe just "The alumni of ..." Fixed "Moon Landing" no need for caps. Fixed Majority Leader isn't capitalised that way. Fixed Fix the piped redirect for Chinese Republic. Fixed Otherwise for me it's just how comprehensive it is, and I simply don't have time to check that. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:47, 28 January 2018 (UTC) The Rambling Man Comments are addressed. Jmnbqb (talk) 04:56, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Resolved comments from BeatlesLedTV (talk) 17:43, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

;Comments from BeatlesLedTV All images need alt text These links all need to be fixed, especially the dead one. When sorting names they should be sorted by last name per WP:Sorting. Capitalize the instances of "Transferred out" in the class year col Everything else looks good to me. Great job! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 23:42, 29 January 2018 (UTC) @BeatlesLedTV: all the above have been corrected, though my perspective differs from yours regarding two items. Many Asian names have their family name written first and are thus sorted that way (which looks wrong though I believe it to be correct); see WP:NAMESORT. I was able to access every link without any changes made to them; the only exceptions are 'dead' "original" ones, though they have working archive links alongside them in the same citation; the associated template presents both. Please comment further if you believe changes are still needed for these items. Thanks! —ADavidB 02:41, 30 January 2018 (UTC) Adavidb Alright the sorting I'm not too worried about in that case. But all the references still need to be fixed. They all need to be working according to the toolbox. Whoever conducts the source review later on will say the same thing. BeatlesLedTV (talk) 02:48, 30 January 2018 (UTC) @BeatlesLedTV: Okay. The two original dead links are removed, leaving only their associated archive links. —ADavidB 03:26, 30 January 2018 (UTC) Adavidb Alright I'm sorry for being blunt. I just know that a source reviewer would say the same thing as we all like the toolbox to have all white links. I know that for green links those can usually be fixed simply by archiving them. The blue and orange ones I'm less familiar with but they should try to be sorted out soon. I would say that is the only problem for me now. Everything else looks good. BeatlesLedTV (talk) 16:06, 30 January 2018 (UTC) I understand your concern BeatlesLedTV. I would like to get an opinion from somebody who usually conducts source reviews (maybe The Rambling Man) on how this may be fixed before we start removing the references since it may result in a loss of information/entries if replacement references can't be found. Jmnbqb (talk) 16:43, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

• Support – Alright I understand. I'll offer my support. Great job to both of you! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 17:43, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

• Support this nomination. Just one thing, archive the links that aren't already. Yashthepunisher (talk) 17:39, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

• Thanks for your support. Links are archived. Jmnbqb (talk) 21:03, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Source review passed; promoting. --PresN 15:51, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Knowledge (XXG) talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 23:32, 26 March 2018 (UTC) .

---

Nominator(s): ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:27, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

The list for 2000 has already been promoted to FL and the lists for 2001, 2002 and 2003 all have multiple supports, so here's the next in the sequence...... ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:27, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Comments from BeatlesLedTV

• First pic needs alt text
• "in 2004 was the seven achieved by" → "in 2004 was seven, achieved by"
• Unsort ref col
• Artists should be sorted by last name per WP:Sorting. Currently they're sorted by first name

That's all I got. Great job! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 20:33, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

• All sorted -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:14, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

• Support – Looks good to me. Great job! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 04:03, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 19:57, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Comments " airplay" is piped to a redirect. "since the issue dated" and this may affect other FL/FLCs, I just thought since it's a new para, it's worth reiterating that it's the issue of Billboard you're talking about, to avoid ambiguity with issues of records etc. "achieved by three different songs." name them? ""Live Like You Were Dying" was ranked number one on Billboard's year-end chart of the most popular country songs." maybe move to before the preceding sentence. Ref 35 title should probably be July 17? The Rambling Man (talk) 21:11, 19 January 2018 (UTC) All done. Fixing point 3 necessitated re-writing some other chunks, hope it is all still OK....... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:04, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

• " having been at the top since the issue of Billboard dated December 20, 2003." Ref? Courcelles (talk) 21:42, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Done -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:28, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
    • Support. Courcelles (talk) 06:26, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Well, this one stalled out a bit, after the earlier ones went so fast too. I'm trying to clear out some of these stalled ones at the bottom of the FLC list, so I'm going to be unorthodox and promote after a review. I tweaked a couple minor things (note my comment about how to write alt text for the future), and source review passed. --PresN 16:54, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Knowledge (XXG) talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 23:31, 26 March 2018 (UTC) .

---

Nominator(s): Damian Vo (talk) 17:11, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

I'm nominating this for featured list because it meets the criteria for a featured list. Look forward to your comments and suggestions. Damian Vo (talk) 17:11, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Comments

• Delink Italy, as WP:OLINK suggests us not to link popular places.

Done. Damian Vo (talk) 11:20, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

• You can simply write the character names in bracket and remove 'as' from the plot synopsis.

I put the actor names in bracket. Damian Vo (talk) 11:20, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

• I feel linking cinematographer and soundtrack is redundant.

I delinked "cinematographer". The "Soundtrack" link is headed to the film's soundtrack subpage, not the genre. Damian Vo (talk) 11:20, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

• Is the premiere date necessary? If not, then write '2017 Sundance film festival' and remove the dates.

That's the world premiere date, so I think it's fairly important. Damian Vo (talk) 11:20, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

• Linking words like wide release and limited release is not necessary.

Delinked. Damian Vo (talk) 11:20, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

• ".and performances by Chalamet, Hammer, and Stuhlbarg." --> and performances by the lead actors.

I simply changed into "performances" since I have found positive reviews for Casar as well. Damian Vo (talk) 11:20, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

• The above sentence should be backed by some references.

It is supported by sources from Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic in the following sentences. Damian Vo (talk) 11:20, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Yashthepunisher (talk) 12:21, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

• Support this nomination. Yashthepunisher (talk) 12:13, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Thank you so much for your support! :) Damian Vo (talk) 12:23, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

• Support, looks good to me. --Golbez (talk) 19:29, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

• Support – All good for me. Great job! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 02:23, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Thank you both! Damian Vo (talk) 11:12, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Source review passed; promoting. --PresN 15:51, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Knowledge (XXG) talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 23:31, 26 March 2018 (UTC) .

---

Nominator(s): Erick (talk) 21:00, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

With my FLC for Billboard Latin Music Hall of Fame gaining enough supports, I am now nominating this article for FL. Continuing on with my FLC for Latin music, this list is different in that the accolade is for the behind the scenes guys (producers, engineers, etc.). This FLC is based on the Latin Grammy Lifetime Achievement Award which I got FL two years ago. I look forward to your comments. Erick (talk) 21:00, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Resolved comments from BeatlesLedTV (talk) 20:54, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

;Comments from BeatlesLedTV Lead's first sentence needs a ref "Since 2005, the Trustees Awards has been presented to more than recipients" – more than what? Lead should honestly be a little longer. The second "paragraph" only has one sentence Link every country mentioned in the lead Table needs scope cols (you have scope rows but not cols) Link Billboard in ref 1 Add author to ref 2 Check out and fix these refs That's all I got. Great job! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 02:17, 6 February 2018 (UTC) @BeatlesLedTV: Thanks for the comments. How does it look now? Erick (talk) 15:27, 6 February 2018 (UTC) Yeah looks better. Also make sure the link to the awards ceremonies aren't redirects. Right now they are all "Latin Grammys of xxxx" instead of "xx Annual Latin Grammy Awards". BeatlesLedTV (talk) 16:02, 6 February 2018 (UTC) @BeatlesLedTV: Done. Erick (talk) 20:32, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

• Support – Looks good to me. Great job on this! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 20:54, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Comments from Aoba47

• For this sentence (This can include producers, songwriters, composers, record label executives, and journalists.), I would avoid using “This” in this format”. Maybe something like: “It can be award to…) or (Recepients can include…) to avoid this use of “this”.
• For this part (a string of galas just prior to the annual Latin Grammy Awards ceremony.), I do not think that “just” is needed as “prior” works on its own and conveys the same meaning in my opinion.
• I am not sure about the lead’s second paragraph. It seems like it could be combined with the first paragraph.
• The last sentence of the first paragraph and the first and second sentences of the second paragraph have the same sentence construction (i.e. the “presented” verbage). I would revise to avoid the repetition of this word if possible.
• I was a little confused by the notability of this sentence (Pierre Cossette was also the recipient of the Grammy Trustees Award in 1995.). Is he the only person to ever receive both? If so, then please clarify this. It seems rather out-of-place in the lead without the full context.
• You link the countries in the lead, but not in the table. Just wanted to raise this to your attention.
• According to the infobox, the award as last given in 2017. The lead does not mention that the award is no longer given or why it was discontinued. Can you please address this in the lead?

Wonderful work with this list. Once my comments are addressed, I will be more than happy to support this for promotion. If possible, I would greatly appreciate it if you could provide some comments on my current FAC (Knowledge (XXG):Featured article candidates/All Money Is Legal/archive1). Either way, good luck with this, and have a great start of your week. Aoba47 (talk) 22:54, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

@Aoba47: I believe I have addressed your issues. The last awarded is just the last time they gave the award. It hasn't been discontinued. Erick (talk) 21:24, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

• Thank you for addressing everything. I have removed the "last awarded" part from the infobox as it implies that it was discontinued. I would add to the infobox the current recipient of the award to the infobox (see these two articles for what I mean Academy Award for Best Supporting Actress and Academy Award for Best Actress). I will support this once this comment is addressed. Aoba47 (talk) 22:02, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

@Aoba47: Thanks for the comments. I have fixed the issues you brought up. Erick (talk) 17:36, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

• I support this for promotion. Great job with this! Aoba47 (talk) 17:43, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Comments from Yashthepunisher

• The country names should be delinked per WP:OLINK.
• "Latin Academy of Recording Arts & Sciences" in the general reference is piped to a redirect.
• You can mention the total number of times the award has been given, in the infobox.

Yashthepunisher (talk) 17:36, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

@Yashthepunisher: Addressed everything but the last point. I don't see a parameter on the template for the number of times it has been awarded. Erick (talk) 04:24, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

You can take a clue from here. Yashthepunisher (talk) 10:52, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

@Yashthepunisher: I've added the number of times awarded. Erick (talk) 16:20, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

• Support this nomination. Yashthepunisher (talk) 05:55, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

Source review passed; promoting. --PresN 15:51, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Knowledge (XXG) talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 23:30, 26 March 2018 (UTC) .

---

Nominator(s): Lizard (talk) 17:28, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Another list of AP NFL awards. This one isn't as straightforward for various reasons, but I believe I've done the best I can and the list meets FL criteria. Lizard (talk) 17:28, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

(Note: This nomination was not transcluded onto WP:FLC until January 24) --PresN 20:54, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Resolved comments from Giants2008 (Talk) 03:22, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Comments – I commented last year on the article's talk page regarding a table formatting issue and have been meaning to look at this FLC. There are a handful of things I found that could use fixes, and a couple of them will depend upon updates that will be needed later this week. In "to recognize the winner of each year's Associated Press MVP award", you could use the abbreviated version of AP since it was spelled out earlier. Consider linking Brady in the second paragraph, if he doesn't win this year's award and earn a first-paragraph mention when this is updated. Fourth paragraph may need some work if the Patriots do win the Super Bowl, but will require an update even if they don't. The general references should probably be alphabetized. That means that the NFL Record and Fact Book page would be moved to the last position, as Lee comes after Full. Speaking of the NFL Record and Fact Book cite, the p. should be pp. as that is a multiple-page reference. Changing the page= parameter of the cite template to pages= will fix this easily. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:18, 30 January 2018 (UTC)  Done. Perhaps there's something to this "curse," eh? Lizard (talk) 02:07, 6 February 2018 (UTC) The mention of Brady being a quarterback should probably be moved up to the first paragraph. The stat about eight straight Super Bowl losses by MVPs still needs an update. This looks like a source that offers sufficient support for a modified sentence. Giants2008 (Talk) 03:22, 7 February 2018 (UTC)  Done Looks like it's now nine straight. I must've miscounted or not noticed that Brady was already counted once. Lizard (talk) 04:09, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

• Support – Made a further tweak to the article myself to finish off my batch of comments. Overall, this looks like a strong list, and I'm sure TRM's couple of comments will be handled in due course. Giants2008 (Talk) 23:14, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 11:45, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Comments - Nice piece of work I think it may be worthwhile stating explicitly that the teams in the table are targeted at the explicit team season articles rather than just the teams themselves. I didn't realise that until I noticed a difference with the Baltimore Colts link in the image caption. Ref in table should be Ref(s). The Rambling Man (talk) 07:33, 7 February 2018 (UTC)  Done I directed the links in the table to the main team pages. That's probably better anyway. Lizard (talk) 17:09, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

• Support - my concerns addressed. The Rambling Man (talk) 11:45, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Okay, this one has been here for a while and stalled out, and the two supports are the only other two people who could promote it... so I'm going to do something a bit unorthodox here. I reviewed the list and found no issues, and did a source review and found 2 minor things that I fixed myself as faster than describing them, and I'm going to go ahead and promote. --PresN 16:07, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Knowledge (XXG) talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 23:32, 12 March 2018 (UTC) .

---

Nominator(s): Jmnbqb (talk) 01:39, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because (yes it meets the criteria), but more so this list contains information of interest to multiple communities and would provide viewers with information on notable people with Greek life involvement, specifically Tau Kappa Epsilon, which is rarely communicated to audiences. I have researched and added as many applicable, secondary references as possible, and I have incorporated all of the suggestions from the peer review such as expanding the lead, standardizing the capitalization, and ensuring all entries have a reference. I would deeply appreciate consideration for this article becoming a featured list (which would be my first!) Jmnbqb (talk) 01:39, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Resolved comments from BeatlesLedTV (talk) 19:56, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

;Comments from BeatlesLedTV Normally all tables need scope rows and cols per MOS:ACCESS however you don't use a "wikitable" formatting so I don't it's possible for you to use those. I'll definitely wait to see what other editors have to say about it. I'm not sure, but I based the table off of the list template on Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Fraternities and Sororities. Jmnbqb (talk) 16:43, 11 January 2018 (UTC) All names should be sorted by last name and not by first name per WP:Sorting Is this a general note, or does something need to be fixed? I couldn't find a table that wasn't sorted properly. Jmnbqb (talk) 16:43, 11 January 2018 (UTC) Jmnbqb Yeah when sorting names in tables they need to be sorted by last name per WP:Sorting. Currently they are sorted by first name. BeatlesLedTV (talk) 19:00, 11 January 2018 (UTC) BeatlesLedTV I fixed the tables. Sorry, I didn't understand what you were getting at. I had to read up on sort keys. Jmnbqb (talk) 02:48, 12 January 2018 (UTC) In the entertainment section, uncapitalize "The" in artist names that are mid-sentence per MOS:THEMUSIC. For example, The Four Freshmen → the Four Freshmen Music artists are fixed. Jmnbqb (talk) 16:43, 11 January 2018 (UTC) That's all I got for now. Great job on this! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 04:18, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

• Support – All good for me. Great job to you! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 19:56, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 16:34, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Comments a quick runthrough right now: The Rambling Man First round of comments have been addressed. Jmnbqb (talk) 03:49, 20 January 2018 (UTC) "The list of Tau Kappa Epsilon brothers" nope, we don't start list article like this. Perhaps "Tau Kappa Epsilon brothers are those individuals who..." Fixed. Please confirm the templates you're using support row and col scopes per MOS:ACCESS. Confirmed by Teahouse response. WP:OVERCITE, why seven references for Reagan, for example? Unless controversial, just one would be fine. All references were fixed to have a maximum of 3. Cites should be in numerical order. Fixed. Sortable tables throughout means that anything in any table which is linked needs to be linked every single time. I wiki linked more terms. I don't know specifically what more needs to be linked though. I mean, if you link U.S. Senator once in a sortable table, you need to link it every time, because the linked version may not come first after sorting. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:06, 26 January 2018 (UTC) The Rambling Man Fixed. "Jr", Knowledge (XXG) has removed the comma from all these. Fixed. Is this list 100% complete? If not, {{incomplete list}} should be deployed. I added the {{dynamic list}} at the top of the page (I thought it was more appropriate than {{incomplete list}}). Does it need to be placed in a different location instead of at the top? The Rambling Man (talk) 20:43, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

• Stupid question time, what is the "Grand Chapter"? Those listed for it don't have a school listed...? Courcelles (talk) 17:47, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

• Nah not a stupid question. It's essentially the chapter of TKE Headquarters, so there's no associated school. Most of the Grand Chapter brothers were initiated at various TKE Conclaves, which are international biennial meetings of the Fraternity. Jmnbqb (talk) 04:01, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

• Can we add a footnote explaining that? Courcelles (talk) 08:22, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

• Footnote is added. Jmnbqb (talk) 01:18, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

• Support Courcelles (talk) 19:32, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
• Support Three minor questions/comments (and my support is *not* conditional on them being changed)

1. Three brothers are listed as being from Colonies, does that mean they became brothers as part of the colonization effort but had graduated by the time the charter was granted? If so, can that be explained?

Note is added.

1. Grand Chapter brothers are, I believe, what most fraternities would call Honorary brothers. Does only Grand Chapter have the ability to grant brotherhood in Tau Kappa Epsilon to people no longer associated with a college (and if so, can a chapter grant brotherhood to a professor)

Yes, initiates from the Grand Chapter are honorary, but other chapters can also initiate honorary members.

are any of the other brothers listed under chapters honorary to the chapter?

Definitely, but the problem is that there is no definitive source or method to distinguish who is honorary and who isn't, so I avoided notating it since I can't guarantee that it's correct for everyone.

1. Putting Westling and Boxing together seems a little odd, might splitting work better? (and that's a general question, so if others support the merger, please say so)Naraht (talk) 14:01, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

The only reason for merging is that there is only one boxer, so I just lumped them together.

Missed that the last was a wrestler.Naraht (talk) 17:01, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

• Also, for those Tau Kappa Epsilon brothers who are notable and who were Presidents of Tau Kappa Epsilon, please include that in their notability.Naraht (talk) 14:17, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
  • Notability is added.
    • Added in Logan and Muse as well.
      • Thanks!

Comments are addressed. Thanks for the review! Jmnbqb (talk) 14:34, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Thanx! I may find

Source Review

• All references that have the author as "Staff writer" or similar should remove it- the author field(s) are for named people, not generic writer name stand-ins; in that case, leave it blank.
  • Fixed.
• Please add ISBNs to book citations, such as ref 109 (use to get a properly-formatted 13-digit ISBN if you have an unformatted/10-digit one, like at ref 81)
  • Fixed, although there are 2 problems. I couldn't find an ISBN for ref 51, but found an OCLO number; also, ref 108 isn't registering the isbn, even though it matches the ISBN in the URL link.
• How is "Stacy's Got Greek" a reliable source? It appears to be an apparel store website, not a biographer
  • Reference removed.

That's all, not too much. --PresN 20:27, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

PresN, replied to comments. Thanks for the source review, Jmnbqb (talk) 22:46, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

I'd actually feel better if Stacy's Got Greek was removed. This doesn't reduce any of the brothers down to a primary source *except* for Jim Harrick, which I can't find in any external source. The odd thing is that Jim Harrick (Sr.) didn't graduate from Marshall, he graduated Morris Harvey College (now U of Charleston) which is two hours away. He graduated in 1960, and his date of induction is in 1957. So there is an oddity here. Did he transfer schools from Marshall to Morris Harvey?Naraht (talk) 21:01, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

(Apparently so. "After Harrick transferred from Marshall to Morris Harvey..." See https://www.upi.com/Archives/1982/03/10/The-state-of-West-Virginia-is-mighty-proud-of/4988384584400/ ) Still would feel better with a second source.Naraht (talk) 21:03, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Source review passed; promoting. --PresN 15:27, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Knowledge (XXG) talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 23:32, 12 March 2018 (UTC) .

---

Nominator(s): Pseud 14 (talk) 09:39, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

I've been working on this list beginning of January 2018 on the songs recorded by Filipino singer Regine Velasquez, listing down notable songs/singles that span her 31-year career. It has undergone a GOCE copy-edit for the lead section. Constructive criticism, in any form and from anyone, will be appreciated. Cheers! Pseud 14 (talk) 09:39, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Resolved comments from BeatlesLedTV (talk) 19:21, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

;Comments from BeatlesLedTV Make sure songs and albums are not sorted by definite articles "The, A, An," etc. per WP:Sorting (make sure the three that begin with "A" are moved to the correct spots alphabetically) Fixed and sorted accordingly There isn't an end quote for "Written in the Sand" Fixed Every image needs alt text (aside from Velasquez's that already has it) Alt text added to all images Add scope rows to the key, specifically the colored boxes (if you're confused or have questions just ask) Done (do let me know if I did it correctly) Change the song table heading to something like "Name of song, credited artist(s), writer(s), original release, and year of release" Done (titled headings as: Song name, Credited artist(s), Writer(s), Original release, and Year of release) Actually I meant something like this. I fixed it for you. BeatlesLedTV (talk) 07:37, 28 January 2018 (UTC) Gotcha. My bad I misunderstood . Thanks for your edit. Is it necessary to have songs like "Sometime, Somewhere" and "Tuwing Umuulan (At Kapiling Ka)" listed twice? I see that she has recorded many songs with the same titles but have different writers. These two in particular have the same writer, Ryan Cayabyab. You think it'd be better to include the version released at a later date in a note saying she rerecorded and was released on ____? Agreed! I made the necessary changes as suggested. (with the exception of Fallin', same song title but in fact different writers as one is a Filipino composition and the other is an international song) Yeah definitely leave in songs that have different writers but share the same title. I do find that interesting though that an artist would record multiple songs with the same title. BeatlesLedTV (talk) 07:37, 28 January 2018 (UTC) Make sure in the lead, the instance mid-sentence of "The Beatles" → "the Beatles" per MOS:THEMUSIC as well as per a RfC discussion and a RfM discussion (specifically for them) Fixed Comma after ""I'll Never Love This Way Again" by Dionne Warwick" Done That's all I got. Great job on this! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 19:32, 27 January 2018 (UTC) BeatlesLedTV, thanks very much for your valuable input. I have addressed those things as mentioned in my comments. Look forward to any additional comments as you find fit. Cheers! --Pseud 14 (talk) 06:29, 28 January 2018 (UTC) I found something else. Per WP:Sorting, names are to be sorted by last name and not first, which is how it is currently sorted for the artist col. Honestly, unless you wanna do all the coding for that, I would just unsorted that col. Or you could check out WP:NAMESORT and do something like the default sort key (which I actually never knew about until now). Whatever you prefer. BeatlesLedTV (talk) 07:43, 28 January 2018 (UTC) BeatlesLedTV, thanks for the quick note. I did go over the artist col and from what I see, they are sorted per last name (with the exception of artists professionally known by first name i.e. Jaya). I did however sort everything credited as "Regine Velasquez with/featuring -- (artist) under "Velasquez" while "(Artist) with/featuring Regine Velasquez" under that specific artist's last name. Let me know if what I'm seeing is correct (unless I'm seeing differently from what you noted) :) Look forward to your feedback. --Pseud 14 (talk) 08:09, 28 January 2018 (UTC) Yep looks good to me. I also made this small link fix. BeatlesLedTV (talk) 19:19, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

• Support – Everything looks good to me. Great job to you! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 19:21, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

BeatlesLedTV, Thank you --Pseud 14 (talk) 13:13, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

• "Filipino singer Regine Velasquez has recorded material for seventeen studio albums, nine soundtrack albums and five extended plays (EP), and has collaborated with other artists on duets and featured songs on their respective albums." - seems like it could be split into two sentences
• "including "I Don't Want to Miss a Thing" by Aerosmith, "The Long and Winding Road" by the Beatles, "I'll Never Love This Way Again" by Dionne Warwick, and "Music and Me" by Michael Jackson. " - you haven't been using the serial comma elsewhere, so don't use it here

Otherwise, prose looks good to me. ceranthor 15:18, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Ceranthor, thanks for your comments. The above have been addressed. Cheers! --Pseud 14 (talk) 10:12, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

I feel comfortable supporting this, then. ceranthor 14:28, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Thank you Ceranthor, much appreciate your support. Cheers! --Pseud 14 (talk) 11:32, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Support

• "The lead single "Fly" was released—the only original song on the record" - suggest moving "the only original song on the record" between Fly and was.

• Done

• "A cover album, it contained covers of international singles" - cover ... cover.

• Fixed.

• "The album has since been certified twelve-times" - not sure hyphen is needed here.

• Removed

• "She worked with producer Tats Faustino, who wrote "Dadalhin", and collaborated with singer Janno Gibbs, who wrote the ballad "Sa Aking Pag-iisa"." - who wrote ... who wrote. Repetitive.

• Fixed

• "In addition to her studio work, Velasquez has recorded songs for her films' soundtracks" - what do you mean "her films"? Has she starred in them? If so, that should be clarified since there is nothing here talking about her film work.

• Clarified and reworded.

Nothing major to detract me from supporting. FrB.TG (talk) 21:16, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

FrB.TG, thank you for your comments. I have addressed them as mentioned above. Much appreciate your support. Cheers! --Pseud 14 (talk) 11:32, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Hi there Pseud 14! I really apologize for this coming so late, but I really didn't find time for this earlier. I really appreciate what you've done with the article and found no significant issues apart for some tweaks I've done in the lead to improve the language and flow of the text (feel free to undo things if you feel I've done something wrong...). The table and the refs also seem to be on point. All in all, this is a clear support from me! Best regards and good luck; Cartoon network freak (talk) 22:06, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Thanks Cartoon network freak! Much appreciate your support. Cheers! --Pseud 14 (talk) 07:57, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Source review passed; promoting. --PresN 15:27, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Knowledge (XXG) talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 23:31, 12 March 2018 (UTC) .

---

Nominator(s): The Rambling Man (talk) 16:55, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Following hot on the heels of Bryan Habana's list, this is all about BOD, no, sorry, BO'D. Legend of Irish and Lions rugby, basically a try machine and hopefully this list is worthy of his achievements. The Rambling Man (talk) 16:55, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Resolved comments from Kosack (talk) 17:45, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Comments from Kosack Comments: The last paragraph states that he has scored two hat-tricks, against France and Scotland, but in the table there is also a hat-trick listed against Japan in 2000 (tries 7, 8 and 9)? The source for the Japan match only credits him with two tries however. Kosack great spot, and I omitted his try against France in 2001 as a result, so that's now fixed. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:40, 24 February 2018 (UTC) In the key, should the * symbol have the try after denotes? Seems to be inconsistent with the other key items denotes that the match, denotes the try etc. Kosack (talk) 07:19, 24 February 2018 (UTC) Done. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:40, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

Support - Looks good to me, nice work. Kosack (talk) 17:45, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Resolved comments from BeatlesLedTV (talk) 20:33, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

;Comments from BeatlesLedTV First pic needs alt text Added. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:31, 25 February 2018 (UTC) This is just a question but in these lists do think the result cols could benefit from using class="db-eWVzIHRhYmxlLQ"|Won and class="db-dGFibGUtbm8" | Lost instead of just the words? Like how award tables use. I'm not sure how that would really help. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:31, 25 February 2018 (UTC) I didn't realize it messed it up. I meant the templates for won and lost BeatlesLedTV (talk) 20:33, 25 February 2018 (UTC) Result col: Drawn → Draw (personally think this sounds better) Well "drawn" is in keeping with "won" and "lost", otherwise it should be "win" and "lose" and "draw". The Rambling Man (talk) 20:31, 25 February 2018 (UTC) Also, you think the key could benefit from being in a table? Not really, the Habana list passed without it being a table, it could be, but it's aesthetics really. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:31, 25 February 2018 (UTC) Everything looks good as always. Great job! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 20:26, 25 February 2018 (UTC) Thanks, BeatlesLedTV, responded above. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:31, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

• Support – Alright looks good to me. Great job! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 20:33, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Resolved comments from JennyOz (talk) 10:37, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Comments by JennyOz Hi TRM, my questions and tweaks..., Prose "He is the former captain..." - 'a' former captain? "...and has previously captained the British and Irish Lions." - swap "has previously" to 'also' "...during the Lions victory over Australia..." - apostrophe? ie Lions' "... total tally of 47 international tries,..." - combined tally? ..."he retired with 141 caps in..." - wlink caps to Cap (sport) "...Lansdowne Road. It was the first of 19 tries O'Driscoll scored at the venue which..." - table only has 17. The difference is tries 42 and 45 at Aviva Stadium ie same location? Maybe needs a note below table eg Lansdowne Road is the location of the Lansdowne Road Stadium now redeveloped as the Aviva Stadium. (Otherwise editors might change 19 to 17?) "...went on to score tries in the 2003 and 2007 World Cups." - and 2011 (try 46) "His 33rd try earned him..." - insert international ie his 33rd international (just to re-emphasise) "An exchange of passes culminated with O'Driscoll receiving the ball 9 metres (10 yd) out before scoring." - needs another ref beside the yt one? This one is rather fine. (Better than the Tele one at IRPA list.) "..."Tier 1" nations..." - refine wlink to T1 section ie #Tier 1? Key asterisk denotes was scored - add 'the try' (you accidentally removed?) Table no worries Refs ref 34 - byline Bruce Pope ref 38 - add pubn date 7 February 2009 ref 41 - Gareth Evans - Gareth Roberts ref 41 - pubn date 21 March 2009 ref 42 - pubn date 15 Nov - 16 ref 43 - pubn date 21 Nov - 22 ref 44 - byline Richard Petrie ref 46 - pubn date 20 Nov - 21 ref 48 - byline Bruce Pope ref 49 - byline James Standley That's all my queries. JennyOz (talk) 13:18, 28 February 2018 (UTC) JennyOz thanks very much, all incorporated. The Rambling Man (talk) 09:05, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Support - Thanks for changes, very happy to support another fine list. JennyOz (talk) 10:37, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

• Support - can't see any issues -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:48, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Source review passed; promoting. --PresN 15:27, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Knowledge (XXG) talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 23:32, 5 March 2018 (UTC) .

---

Nominator(s): Yashthepunisher (talk) 15:38, 28 January 2018 (UTC) & Vivvt (talk · contribs)

This list is inline with the other Padma Bhushan FLs of every decade. As usual, hope to receive constructive criticism for improvement. Cheers! Yashthepunisher (talk) 15:38, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Resolved comments from BeatlesLedTV (talk) 16:49, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

;Comments from BeatlesLedTV "Satyameva Jayate" should only be in quotes not italics "Truth alone triumphs" → "Truth alone triumphs." (multiple instances) Pardon, but I can't see the issue here. These images should have alt text "Dr Hedgewar" → "Dr. Hedgewar" "2005. " → "2005." Made this edit for you per MOS:DASH Fix this green link That's all I got. Great job on this! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 20:23, 30 January 2018 (UTC) BeatlesLedTV Thanks for your comments, I have fixed the rest. Yashthepunisher (talk) 17:22, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

• Support – Looks good to me. Great job on this! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 16:49, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Quick comment - You can't use File:Sharan Rani.jpg in this article, there isn't (and won't be) a suitable fair use rationale for its inclusion. The Rambling Man (talk) 09:02, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Removed. Yashthepunisher (talk) 10:02, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Vivvt how are we getting on here? The Rambling Man (talk) 10:02, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

@Force Radical and The Rambling Man: I am done with the changes. Please review. Apologies for the delay as I was busy in the real life. - Vivvt (Talk) 08:59, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

• This needs to be fixed.

Done

• All web references should preferably be archived.

Done

• There are certain references that are missing accessdates. They might be redundant in some cases but you'd want to stay consistent.

I have been told that Pdf files don't require accessdates. It is mentioned in rest of the refs.

• The Hindu has not been italicised in some cases; sams for India Today

Fixed

• Also, isn't Frontline a magazine too?

Yes, fixed.

• What's "Hyderabad: Deccan Herald"?

Fixed.

• The Pioneer and The New York Times among others haven't been wiki-linked at all.

Linked publishers at their first instances.

• The ones that have been archived all look proper and functional. VedantTalk 08:55, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Numerounovedant Thanks for your review. Yashthepunisher (talk) 13:35, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

• You might also want to remove Press Trust of India from the first reference, as you do not mention it anywhere. VedantTalk 17:47, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Done. Yashthepunisher (talk) 19:06, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

The source review is now complete. VedantTalk 20:50, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Support from Aoba47

Wonderful work with this list. I could not find much to comment about except for my suggestion below. I support this for promotion. My only comment is this:

• For sentences like this (Twenty awards were presented in 2000, followed by thirty-two in 2001, twenty-five in 2002, thirty-two in 2003, nineteen in 2004, thirty in 2005, thirty-seven in 2006, thirty-two in 2007, thirty-five in 2008 and thirty-one in 2009.), I believe that it is Knowledge (XXG) policy to put numbers over ten in numerals rather than spell them out. However, I believe either format would be correct as long as it is consistent across the board so I personally do not have an issue with it, but someone who is more by the book may raise this as something that requires improvement/change. Just wanted to let you know. Have a great start to your week! Aoba47 (talk) 21:29, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

• Aoba47 Thanks for your comments and support. I have performed the change as per your suggestion and MOS:NUM. Yashthepunisher (talk) 10:25, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

• Thank you for addressing this. Aoba47 (talk) 22:19, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Comments from FrB.TG

• Maybe de-link because WP:OVERLINK advises against linking countries or well-known geographic locations.
• "Awards can be revoked or restored, both of which require the authority of the President, the award is archived and the recipients are required to surrender their medals when their names are struck from the register; none of the awardees of Padma Bhushan during 2000–2009 have been revoked. The recommendations are received from all the state and the union territory governments, as well as from Ministries of the Government of India, Bharat Ratna and Padma Vibhushan awardees, the Institutes of Excellence, Ministers, Chief Ministers and Governors of States, Members of Parliament, and private individuals." Unbelievably long; definitely needs splitting. Also that comma splice is rather awful.
• "These included 37 foreign recipients; one each from the China, Czech Republic" - why "the China"? That "the" should rather be used for Czech Republic.
• " However she was surprised" - comma after "however".
• " She stated, "I would only accept awards from academic institutions or those associated with my professional work, and not accept state awards."" Do We really need this quote? Too much weight has been given to this part. I think that the previous three sentences illustrate your point just well without this.
• "L. Subramaniam, known as "the god of Indian violin," was awarded Padma Bhushan in 2001 and is considered the first among Indians to introduce the concept of Jugalbandi between Hindustani classical and Carnatic music." "The god of Indian violin" part is really unneeded and is more importantly not given in the source.
• "Raj Reddy is an Indian-American computer scientist and is the recipient of the Turing Award (1994) for his work in the field of Artificial Intelligence and computer science." When do we get to the part of his relevance in this list?
• "A recipient of the Padma Shri and Shanti Swarup Bhatnagar Prize for Science and Technology, Govindarajan Padmanaban is an biochemist and biotechnologist. He is a former director of Indian Institute of Science." Great. But when did he receive the Padma Bhushan? FrB.TG (talk) 18:25, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for your comments FrB.TG, I have hopefully resolved them all. Yashthepunisher (talk) 07:02, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

• Support now. Good work. FrB.TG (talk) 11:11, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Promoting. --PresN 20:37, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Knowledge (XXG) talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 23:31, 5 March 2018 (UTC) .

---

Nominator(s): The Rambling Man (talk), Sahara4u (Talk) 14:12, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Just tidied this one up, re-verified the lead, made the table and images accessible. Most of the hard work was done by Sahara4u who has been away from Knowledge (XXG) for a bit, but I've co-nominated them. The Rambling Man (talk) 14:12, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Resolved comments from BeatlesLedTV (talk) 15:55, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

;Comments from BeatlesLedTV Gotta fix this dead link Can you tell me which one that is, I can't run the tool at my current location. The Rambling Man (talk) 11:11, 6 February 2018 (UTC) Weird now it doesn't show as dead so I don't worry about it. BeatlesLedTV (talk) 15:55, 6 February 2018 (UTC) "in a single innings" don't think that's grammatically correct I'm afraid it is. The Rambling Man (talk) 11:11, 6 February 2018 (UTC) There are two "as of February 2018"'s that explain the same thing (that he's first among Test makers in New England). Avoid repetition No, one is talking about Test cricket, the other is talking about cricket in general. The Rambling Man (talk) 11:11, 6 February 2018 (UTC) Adding to the preceding comment, do you plan on updating the "as of" every month or how often exactly? Not really. The point is that the facts are accurate in the lead "as of" the month I updated it. The Rambling Man (talk) 11:11, 6 February 2018 (UTC) Link the first usage of Not out in the lead. Done. The Rambling Man (talk) 11:11, 6 February 2018 (UTC) Everything else looks good. Great job on this! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 02:05, 6 February 2018 (UTC) BeatlesLedTV, I've responded above, one outstanding issue as far as I'm concerned. Cheers! The Rambling Man (talk) 11:11, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

• Support – Looks good to me. Great job on this! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 15:55, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

• Comment Support – Word order needs a fix in "making three against centuries them." That's the only issue I found. Giants2008 (Talk) 03:35, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Giants2008 done, thanks. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:29, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Resolved comments from JennyOz (talk) 14:16, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Comments by JennyOz Hi TRM, my comments (and a question) follow, Prose "Taylor has scored Test centuries at nine cricket grounds, including five at venues outside New Zealand" - ten different grounds in Test table. and six venues outside NZ. (refs 9 and 10 confirm) Done. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:06, 15 February 2018 (UTC) "...he is most successful against West Indies, making three centuries against them." - four Done. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:06, 15 February 2018 (UTC) West Indies - wlink to West Indies cricket team? Done. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:06, 15 February 2018 (UTC) "...scoring 128 not out New Zealand lost the match..." - needs punc Done. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:06, 15 February 2018 (UTC) "He has played 77 Twenty20 International..." - ref now says 78 (and update archive?) I think he played just a couple of days ago in the tri-nations tournament..! The Rambling Man (talk) 13:06, 15 February 2018 (UTC) "...Taylor is joint 31st (with Gary Kirsten)..." - could add 'with 34' just to help when next updates done? Done. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:06, 15 February 2018 (UTC) Tests table C6 - (Question) Taylor retired hurt on 122 on day 2. (Retired hurt says "For the purposes of calculating a batting average, a scorecard entry of 'Retired, hurt' or 'Retired, ill' is considered not out." So in such a case do we mark with an asterisk as not out? Besides the definition, the scorecard shows the score being "for 7" (or "7 for" in Australian). Counting "outs" including Taylor comes to 8. So yes, we should asterisk it! The Rambling Man (talk) 13:16, 15 February 2018 (UTC) C9 v windies - ref 7 is for aust v nz match. Should be this? Done. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:16, 15 February 2018 (UTC) date 2 Dec - should be 3 Done. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:16, 15 February 2018 (UTC) C13 - date 15 November - 13 (these date changes are moving to first day of Test match per key) Done. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:16, 15 February 2018 (UTC) C14 - date 30 July - 28 Done. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:16, 15 February 2018 (UTC) C15 - date 7 August - 6 Done. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:16, 15 February 2018 (UTC) C16 - date 28 November - 25 Done. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:16, 15 February 2018 (UTC) innings 1 - 3 (NZ 2nd=3rd of match) Done. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:16, 15 February 2018 (UTC) C17 - date 11 December - 9 add man of the match dagger Done. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:16, 15 February 2018 (UTC) ODI table C10 - remove pipe to sponsor name? Done. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:18, 15 February 2018 (UTC) C11 - strike rate 79.02 - ref says 77.77 Done. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:18, 15 February 2018 (UTC) C14 - strike rate 89.04 - ref says 89.43 Done. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:18, 15 February 2018 (UTC) C17 - ref 48 doesn't work (for me) swap for this? Done. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:18, 15 February 2018 (UTC) add man of the match dagger Done. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:18, 15 February 2018 (UTC) Regards, JennyOz (talk) 11:46, 15 February 2018 (UTC) All done, and as always, my sincerest thanks to you JennyOz for your superb review. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:18, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Support - another great job! JennyOz (talk) 14:16, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Source review passed; promoting. --PresN 20:37, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Knowledge (XXG) talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 23:30, 5 March 2018 (UTC) .

---

Nominator(s):  — Ssven2 14:31, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

This article provides a listing of the notable awards and nominations received by the 2010 Indian Hindi drama film, My Name Is Khan starring Shah Rukh Khan and Kajol. This film is notable for garnering its cast and crew members several awards and nominations. It is my thirteenth attempt at an accolades FLC, and my second for a Bollywood awards list. Any constructive comments to improve this list are most welcome.  — Ssven2 14:31, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

• Comment - "Rizwan Khan (Khan), a NRI suffering from Asperger syndrome who is married to a single mother, Mandira" - if she's married, then by definition she isn't single............ -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:43, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

If so, ChrisTheDude, then how do I rephrase the sentence? How do I say that he has married a woman who has a son from her previous marriage/relationship?  — Ssven2 10:11, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

I would pretty much just say what you have put above: "Rizwan Khan (Khan), a NRI suffering from Asperger syndrome whose wife, Mandira, has a child from a previous relationship"...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:06, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Done. As suggested, ChrisTheDude.  — Ssven2 15:06, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

• Sameer dies as a result of a racist attack by school bullies - It happens in the US, right? Perhaps you may want to link to Racism in the United States.
• Rizwan takes her literally - Not like she was saying an idiom, was she? Or maybe an adynaton? Either way, you may want to replace "literally" with "seriously".

Just these two. I hope there is someone who has enough time to conduct a source review. --Kailash29792 (talk) 09:10, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

Kailash29792, I have resolved the first but I believe "literally" would be more appropriate as she does tell him to tell the president that his name is Rizwan Khan and he's not a terrorist and questions him if he can do it. Although she said that out of grief for her son's death, Rizwan takes her words literally as it is and tries to implement it by meeting the president.  — Ssven2 10:27, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

• Support: Not on the basis of COI, but because I find this good enough for FL. ----Kailash29792 (talk) 04:58, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Thank you very much, Kailash29792. Your thoughts and comments are greatly appreciated.  — Ssven2 09:04, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

I'll take a look later today. VedantTalk 04:53, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

• "a NRI suffering" - maybe you could spell out non-resident Indian as it'll be self-explanatory and the reader would not have to go to a separate page.
• The latter half of the first paragraph is a little monotonous with the overuse of was/were sentences. Maybe you could mix it up.
• Shouldn't the article use INRConvert?
• "went on to win for including" - four?
• "with Johar alone winning for Best Director (Bachchan)." - the "alone" isn't required.

The rest looks good. VedantTalk 16:55, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Numerounovedant, I have hopefully resolved all your comments. Do let me know if there's anything pending. Thanks.  — Ssven2 08:36, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

In that case, I can support this for promotion. Fine work Ssven2. VedantTalk 15:37, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Thank you very much, Numerounovedant. Your thoughts and comments are greatly appreciated.  — Ssven2 15:58, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

• Support – Looks good to me. Most things I can think of are covered above. Great job! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 01:53, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

Thank you very much, BeatlesLedTV. Your thoughts and comments are greatly appreciated.  — Ssven2 02:03, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

I read and re-read the lead a couple of times before I worked out that this is probably set in the US, not India. If that's correct, it would help to make it explicit Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:28, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Done. As suggested, Jimfbleak.  — Ssven2 14:32, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

I can't see anything else, changed to support above Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:08, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Thank you very much, Jimfbleak. Your thoughts and comments are greatly appreciated.  — Ssven2 11:56, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 11:50, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Comments Our article spells his name as Jimmy Sheirgill. The lead is a little unbalanced for me, it should be more about the awards and accolades than all of those involved in the development of the film. Link ₹. "about US$18,851,187" if you're gonig to say "about" then don't be so precise, probably $19 million would be close enough! Otherwise all good. The Rambling Man (talk) 15:25, 1 March 2018 (UTC) I have hopefully resolved your comments, The Rambling Man. Do let me know if there's anything pending. Thanks.  — Ssven2 11:47, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

• Support this one is good go, nice work. The Rambling Man (talk) 11:50, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Thank you very much, The Rambling Man. Your thoughts and comments are greatly appreciated.  — Ssven2 12:17, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Source review passed; promoting. --PresN 20:37, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Knowledge (XXG) talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by The Rambling Man via FACBot (talk) 23:31, 1 March 2018 (UTC) .

---

Nominator(s): ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk) 21:30, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

I am nominating List of HolbyBlue episodes for featured list because I feel that after many months of hard work on improving this article, it is now ready to be considered for promotion to Featured List. I began working on this article back in July, having not seen any of the episodes, but despite this having a good understanding of the show. I watched and researched all of the episodes from both series and constructed elaborate summaries from there. I believe that the prose is professional. Although it took me a long time to write a lead that I was satisfied with, I feel that it covers all the necessary aspects of the show, summarises HolbyBlue neatly, and is suitable in length. This article is not the target of any recent edit wars. This is my first FLC and I look forward to it hopefully succeeding after many hard months of work on it. ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk) 21:30, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 12:16, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Comments "The show's ensemble cast for series one ..." I would suggest you say how many series were made before starting to talk about specifics of each series.  Done ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk) 12:14, 2 January 2018 (UTC) Our article on Cal MacAninch has a capital A in his surname.  Done ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk) 12:14, 2 January 2018 (UTC) And Pigott-Smith has one "g".  Done ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk) 12:14, 2 January 2018 (UTC) "Series two saw actors Oliver Milburn and James Thornton join the serial" perhaps "join the drama" or something, to avoid the "series/serial" repetition.  Done ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk) 12:14, 2 January 2018 (UTC) "The creation of HolbyBlue was announced on 27 April 2006 by the BBC, and was revealed ..." you're still talking about the "creation" here, so perhaps you need something like "The creation of HolbyBlue was announced on 27 April 2006 by the BBC. The series was revealed ..."?  Done ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk) 12:14, 2 January 2018 (UTC) "was recruited on the " I think you normally recruit someone to something.  Done ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk) 12:14, 2 January 2018 (UTC) "8pm" - per MOS:TIME, "12-hour clock times end with lower-case a.m. or p.m., or am or pm, preceded by a non-breaking space"  Done ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk) 12:14, 2 January 2018 (UTC) " of which it failed to win any." reads very awkwardly. I think it's implied in the fact you just call them nominations that they didn't win any of them, you could delete that clause.  Done ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk) 12:14, 2 January 2018 (UTC) No need to repeat first names of the actors you've already mentioned in the lead.  Done ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk) 12:14, 2 January 2018 (UTC) That's about it from me. The Rambling Man (talk) 11:36, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Resolved comments from BeatlesLedTV (talk) 22:27, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

;Comments from BeatlesLedTV TV episodes go in quotes per MOS:QUOTEMARKS#Names and titles  Done ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk) 18:17, 2 January 2018 (UTC) You say in the lead that by the end of the series the show dropped to 2.5 million viewers but the last 10 episodes in the series 2 table don't have ratings to them. Why is that? @BeatlesLedTV: the reason I left out ratings for those episodes is because there was no available consolidated ratings for those episodes. There are, however, a few overnight ratings for some (but not all) of the episodes that aired across the two series. Do you think it would be worth adding the overnight ratings in instead, or leave them out? ElectrodeandtheAnode I definitely think you should have something. If you say it in the lead and if the show was cancelled due to declining ratings you should have evidence for that, not just in the lead. BeatlesLedTV (talk) 18:27, 2 January 2018 (UTC) @BeatlesLedTV:  Done - please let me know if it is okay or not! ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk) 19:00, 2 January 2018 (UTC) ElectrodeandtheAnode I've been checking out other "episodes..." featured lists and they normally have a reference for each episode's ratings, usually from TV by the Numbers or somewhere like that. Have you tried looking into that and if not would it be possible? If you can't find anything leave it how it is and put the fact that some are overnight ratings into a separate note. Other than that it's good for me. BeatlesLedTV (talk) 20:18, 2 January 2018 (UTC) @BeatlesLedTV: I did broadly reference the available figures in the table, the reference is next to "Viewers" (It's BARB) and is where I got all the available data from. Would you prefer it if I removed the broad reference and individually referenced each rating? ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk) 21:13, 2 January 2018 (UTC) ElectrodeandtheAnode That would be preferable but if it's not possible just leave it how it is. BeatlesLedTV (talk) 17:57, 3 January 2018 (UTC) @BeatlesLedTV:  Done ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk) 18:14, 3 January 2018 (UTC) You have another case of "8 pm" that should be changed to "8pm" that Rambling Man talked about  Done - oops, thank you! I should have been more vigilant! ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk) 18:17, 2 January 2018 (UTC) "12" → "twelve"  Done ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk) 18:17, 2 January 2018 (UTC) That's all I got. Great job! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 16:07, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

• Support – Good for me. Great job! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 22:27, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

• "The show was also nominated for six awards during its run." Unless you have a source that specifically says six, I'd consider axing this sentence. That'll all I've got. Courcelles (talk) 05:44, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

• @Courcelles:  Done Removed the sentence as I could not find a source specifically saying six. ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk) 08:15, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

• Support This isn't the easiest type of list to do, good work. Courcelles (talk) 13:34, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Comments from Aoba47

• For this part (and focuses on the daily lives of a number of police officers working at Holby South police station.), I would remove “a number of”. It sounds rather vague and does not add much to the sentence.  Done ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk) 17:20, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
• I have a suggestion for this sentence (Two series of HolbyBlue aired, with the show's ensemble cast for series one consisting of Jimmy Akingbola, Joe Jacobs, David Sterne, Cal MacAninch, James Hillier, Kacey Ainsworth, Richard Harrington, Zöe Lucker, Chloe Howman, Kieran O'Brien, Tim Pigott-Smith and Elaine Glover.). I have received a note in the past during FAC reviews that the “with” construction is discouraged from featured-level work. I would revise the sentence to avoid that. I also not certain about the placement of the “Two series of HolbyBlue aired) as it would seem more appropriate for the second paragraph, which focuses more on the airdates, than the first paragraph, which focuses more on the characters and actors.  Done ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk) 17:20, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
• For this sentence (By the end of the first series, Pigott-Smith had departed.), is there any information on why the actor left the show? A brief part here could be useful as it is rather abrupt.  Done ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk) 17:20, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
• Something about this sentence (Series two saw actors Oliver Milburn and James Thornton join the drama.) reads a little odd to me. I think it would be better to use this structure (Actors Oliver Milburn and James Thornton joined the drama for series two). I think that the “saw” verbage is throwing me off a little.  Done ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk) 17:20, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
• Unlink “Tony Jordan” in the second paragraph as he was already linked in the first paragraph.  Done ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk) 17:20, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
• For this part (at 8 pm, which was one week later than scheduled, for unknown reasons.), I do not believe that the second comma is necessary.  Done ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk) 17:20, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
• The word “series” is used quite a lot in the second paragraph. I would try to cut down on that if possible.  Done ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk) 17:20, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
• For this part (this time for an extended run of twelve episodes, a 50% increase from the first series.), I do not think that the “a 50% increase from the first series” is necessary.  Done ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk) 17:20, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
• I would try to vary the sentence construction for the end of the third paragraph as it is rather repetitive (i.e. X was nominated for/under Y).
  • @Aoba47: I think I have managed to reconstruct the sentences so they are less repetitive now, but I am not too sure. Could you let me know what you think of the last few sentences now please? ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk) 17:20, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Wonderful work with this list. Once my comments are addressed, I will support this for promotion. Aoba47 (talk) 22:43, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

• Thank you for addressing everything. This is a great and interesting list. It definitely inspires me to do another list project in the near future. I support this for promotion. Have a wonderful rest of your week! Aoba47 (talk) 22:19, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.