Knowledge (XXG)

Fallacy

Source 📝

2371:
participants. A fallacy of the second kind is seen as more than simply a violation of the rule of reasonable dialogue. It is also a deceptive tactic of argumentation based on sleight-of-hand. Aristotle explicitly compared contentious reasoning to unfair fighting in athletic contests. But the roots of the pragmatic theory go back even further in history, to the Sophists. The pragmatic theory finds its roots in the Aristotelian conception of a fallacy as a sophistical refutation but also supports the view that many of the types of arguments traditionally labeled as fallacies are in fact reasonable techniques of argumentation that can be used, in many cases, to support legitimate goals of dialogue. Hence, under the pragmatic approach, each case needs to be analyzed individually to determine whether the argument is fallacious or reasonable.
47: 1465:. According to The New Handbook of Cognitive Therapy Techniques, they include "unsubstantiated assertions that are often delivered with a conviction that makes them sound as though they are proven facts." Informal fallacies, in particular, are frequently found in mass media such as television and newspapers. Understanding fallacies may allow one to recognize them in either one's own or others' writing. Avoiding fallacies may help improve one's ability to produce sound arguments. 2154:(JIF) are well documented, and even JIF pioneer Eugene Garfield notes that, "while citation data create new tools for analyses of research performance, it should be stressed that they supplement rather than replace other quantitative and qualitative indicators." To the extent that arguers jettison the acknowledged limitations of JIF-generated data in evaluative judgments or leave behind Garfield's "supplement rather than replace" caveat, they commit anchoring fallacies. 1810:" is independent of any particular conjunction of meaningful propositions. Logical form alone can guarantee that, given true premises, a true conclusion must follow. However, formal logic makes no such guarantee if any premise is false; the conclusion can be either true or false. Any formal error or logical fallacy similarly invalidates the deductive guarantee. Both the argument and all its premises must be true for a conclusion to be true. 2061:. A slippery slope argument originates from a conversation or debate in which two actors take turns. It usually originates from one actor giving advice on a decision or act. Along the way, the actor must make additional choices on similar matters through which the actor enters the ‘grey area’ of the slippery slope. At this point, the actor potentially loses control over the direction of the arguments, thus leading to a ‘fatal’ outcome. 5833: 2101:
arguer to offer a seeming refutation of what is, however, not the actual standpoint. Such an argument involves two arguers, with one criticizing the other's perspective. The reason for the straw man argument to be fallacious originates from the problem of how to deal with natural discourse. The opponent's argument is not reflected by the arguments that are proposed by the speaker.
4661: 1694:. According to Whately, logical fallacies are arguments where the conclusion does not follow from the premises. Material fallacies are not logical errors because the conclusion follows from the premises. He then divided the logical group into two groups: purely logical and semi-logical. The semi-logical group included all of Aristotle's 1481:. Thus, "fallacious arguments usually have the deceptive appearance of being good arguments, because for most fallacious instances of an argument form, a similar but non-fallacious instance can be found." Evaluating an instance of an argument as fallacious is therefore often a matter of evaluating the context of the argument. 1888:, which rarely applies (the first prong of the fork), or one must relax definitions and add nuance to take the actual intent and context of the argument into account (the other prong of the fork). To argue, for example, that one became nauseated after eating a mushroom because the mushroom was poisonous could be an example of the 4675: 2100:
fallacy refers to the refutation of a standpoint in an argument that was never proposed. The fallacy usually occurs in the presentation of an opponent's standpoint as more extreme, distorted, or simplistic than it actually is. Compared to criticizing the opponent's actual standpoint, this allows the
2040:
Sometimes one event really does cause another one that comes later—for example, if one registers for a class and their name later appears on the roll, it's true that the first event caused the one that came later. But sometimes two events that seem related in time are not really related as cause and
2204:
Sometimes a speaker or writer uses a fallacy intentionally. In any context, including academic debate, a conversation among friends, political discourse, advertising, or comedic purposes, the arguer may use fallacious reasoning to try to persuade the listener or reader, by means other than offering
2064:
Such an argument is built up according to the following argumentation scheme: initial premise, sequential premise, indeterminacy premise, control premise, loss of control premise, catastrophic outcome premise, and conclusion. Slippery slope arguments may be defeated by asking critical questions or
1879:
and others have argued that formal, deductive fallacies rarely occur in real life and that arguments that would be fallacious in formally deductive terms are not necessarily so when context and prior probabilities are taken into account, thus making the argument defeasible and/or inductive. Boudry
1598:
is an error in how the arguer is talking. Verbal fallacies are those in which a conclusion is obtained by improper or ambiguous use of words. An example of a language dependent fallacy is given as a debate as to who in humanity are learners: the wise or the ignorant. A language-independent fallacy
2176:
bibliographic databases have difficulty distinguishing between citations of scholarly work that are arms-length endorsements, ceremonial citations, or negative citations (indicating the citing author withholds endorsement of the cited work). Hence, measurement-based value claims premised on the
1468:
It can be difficult to evaluate whether an argument is fallacious, as arguments exist along a continuum of soundness and an argument that has several stages or parts might have some sound sections and some fallacious ones. Moreover, whether a specific argument is fallacious often depends on the
2370:
The dialogue framework required to support the pragmatic theory of fallacy is built on the presumption that argumentative dialogue has both an adversarial component and a collaborative component. A dialogue has individual goals for each participant as well as shared goals that apply to all
1546:, respectively. The classification of informal fallacies may be subdivided into categories such as linguistic, relevance through omission, relevance through intrusion, and relevance through presumption. Alternatively, fallacies may be classified by the process by which they occur, such as 1867:
is committed when one draws an inference from data based on the premise that qualities observed for groups necessarily hold for individuals; for example, "if countries with more Protestants tend to have higher suicide rates, then Protestants must be more likely to commit suicide."
1658:: Here the reason is contradicted by another reason. If both have equal force, then nothing follows. 'Sound is eternal, because it is audible', and 'Sound is non-eternal, because it is produced'. Here 'audible' is counterbalanced by 'produced' and both are of equal force. 1590:) identifies thirteen fallacies. He divided them up into two major types: linguistic fallacies and non-linguistic fallacies, some of which depend on language and others that do not. These fallacies are called verbal fallacies and material fallacies, respectively. A 2366:
According to the pragmatic theory, a fallacy can be either a heuristic error or a ploy used intentionally to unfairly win an argument. There are always two parties to an argument containing a fallacy: the perpetrator and the intended victim.
2142:
are driving a proliferation of new metrics for scholarly authority, and there is lively discussion regarding the relative usefulness of such metrics for measuring the value of knowledge production in the context of an "information tsunami."
1554:(linguistic), and formal fallacies (error in inference). In turn, material fallacies may be placed into the more general category of informal fallacies. Verbal fallacies may be placed in either formal or informal classifications: Compare 1738:, Aph. 33, 38 sqq.) divided fallacies into four Idola (Idols, i.e. False Appearances), which summarize the various kinds of mistakes to which the human intellect is prone. J. S. Mill discussed the subject in book five of his Logic, and 2113:
are subtle mistakes in reasoning leading to invalid mathematical proofs, measurement fallacies are unwarranted inferential leaps involved in the extrapolation of raw data to a measurement-based value claim. The ancient Greek Sophist
2068:
There are several reasons for a slippery slope to be fallacious: for example, the argument is going too far into the future, it is a too complex argument whose structure is hard to identify, or the argument makes emotional appeals.
1783:
or its conclusion. Both may actually be true or may even be more probable as a result of the argument, but the deductive argument is still invalid because the conclusion does not follow from the premises in the manner described.
2184:
of Academic Analytics. This tool purports to measure overall faculty productivity, yet it does not capture data based on citations in books. This creates a possibility that low productivity measurements using the tool commit
1978:
While never a valid logical deduction, if such an inference can be made on statistical grounds, it may nonetheless be convincing. This is because with enough empirical evidence, the generalization is no longer a hasty one.
1960:
that is inadequate (usually because it is atypical or just too small). Stereotypes about people ("frat boys are drunkards", "grad students are nerdy", "women don't enjoy sports", etc.) are common examples of the principle.
2195:
can be committed when one measures the scholarly productivity of a sub-group of individuals (e.g. "Puerto Rican" faculty) via reference to aggregate data about a larger and different group (e.g., "Hispanic" faculty).
2344:
employed fallacious reasoning in many of their cartoons. Wes Boyer and Samuel Stoddard have written a humorous essay teaching students how to be persuasive by means of a whole host of informal and formal fallacies.
1639:, variously estimated to have been composed between the 6th century BCE and the 2nd century CE, lists in its theory of inference five such reasons used in an argument that was further developed by later logicians. 1496:
weaknesses of the audience. Recognizing fallacies can develop reasoning skills to expose the weaker links between premises and conclusions to better discern between what appears to be true and what is true.
6927: 6847: 2045:. For example, if one eats a sandwich and then gets food poisoning, that does not necessarily mean the sandwich caused the food poisoning. Something else eaten earlier might have caused the food poisoning. 2161:
can occur, for example, in the case of sheer quantity metrics based on the premise "more is better" or, in the case of developmental assessment in the field of psychology, "higher is better".
1779:. The flaw can be expressed in the standard system of logic. Such an argument is always considered to be wrong. The presence of the formal fallacy does not imply anything about the argument's 6952: 6788: 6783: 6778: 6471: 4099: 1507:, for instance, an argument is regarded as an interactive protocol between individuals who attempt to resolve their disagreement on the merits of a case. The protocol consists of 6244: 7113: 1449:
with a concealed, or subtle, error. Mathematical fallacies are typically crafted and exhibited for educational purposes, usually taking the form of false proofs of obvious
6795: 2150:
fallacies can occur when unwarranted weight is given to data generated by metrics that the arguers themselves acknowledge are flawed. For example, the limitations of the
6768: 6320: 6663: 4950: 1683:(1787–1863) defines a fallacy broadly as, "any argument, or apparent argument, which professes to be decisive of the matter at hand, while in reality it is not". 7205: 6976: 6932: 6738: 6413: 4955: 3263: 1144: 6959: 2954: 2348:
When someone uses logical fallacies intentionally to mislead in academic, political, or other high-stakes contexts, the breach of trust calls into question
1578:(384–322 BC) was the first to systematize logical errors into a list to make it easier to refute an opponent's thesis and thus win an argument. Aristotle's 7001: 6942: 4802: 965: 6315: 7395: 6756: 6648: 3716: 2420: 6288: 4291:
Habick, Timothy, and Linda Cook. (2018) AICPA Test Development Fairness Guidelines. Association of International Certified Public Accounts, Ewing, NJ.
5869: 1055: 1917:
Though the form of the argument may be relevant, fallacies of this type are "types of mistakes in reasoning that arise from the mishandling of the
46: 6969: 6800: 6763: 6361: 4152: 2118:
was one of the first thinkers to propose that humans can generate reliable measurements through his "human-measure" principle and the practice of
1396:, or potentially due to the limitations of language and understanding of language. These delineations include not only the ignorance of the right 2410: 1795:. But "since deductive arguments depend on formal properties and inductive arguments don't, formal fallacies apply only to deductive arguments." 1906:
In contrast to a formal fallacy, an informal fallacy originates from a reasoning error other than a flaw in the logical form of the argument. A
1664:: When another proof (as by perception) definitely contradicts and disproves the middle term (reason). 'Fire is cold because it is a substance'. 7476: 6718: 6371: 1389: 2072:
It may be that a slippery slope is not necessarily fallacious if context is taken into account and there is an effort to assess plausibility.
6652: 4238: 3529: 3196: 3135: 3072: 3046: 2763: 1258: 5333: 4569: 2181: 2042: 4108: 6922: 6325: 6132: 4990: 4832: 4731: 4717: 4699: 4610: 6828: 6393: 4483: 4465: 4384: 4365: 4319: 3944: 3915: 3652: 3496: 3429: 3372: 2868: 2707: 2671: 1331: 7198: 6610: 6223: 5144: 4187: 4020: 2561: 1945:, however, the conclusions may become warranted and convincing (at which point the arguments are no longer considered fallacious). 1914:, but still remain rationally unpersuasive. Nevertheless, informal fallacies apply to both deductive and non-deductive arguments. 7163: 6508: 684: 510: 4762: 6981: 6310: 6278: 4063: 3234: 1174: 1139: 4780: 6991: 6964: 6901: 6420: 4552: 4540: 4503: 4349: 1933:, also known as inductive fallacies. Here, the most important issue concerns inductive strength or methodology (for example, 3669: 1511:, and violations of these rules are considered fallacies because they frustrate the attempt at resolving the disagreement. 7098: 6842: 6723: 6529: 5752: 4960: 2633: 1228: 2317:
Using an argument's connections to other concepts or people to support or refute it, also called "guilt by association" (
1840:
denotes a general formal fallacy, often meaning one that does not belong to any named subclass of formal fallacies, like
7486: 7191: 6996: 6751: 6658: 6030: 5862: 5788: 5764: 5353: 4774: 4427: 1218: 3096: 2785: 1538:
Fallacies are generally classified strictly by either their structure or their content, such as by classifying them as
1360:
that may appear to be well-reasoned if unnoticed. The term was introduced in the Western intellectual tradition by the
7108: 7103: 6553: 6335: 6040: 5945: 5365: 5109: 4311: 1725: 1514:
Fallacies are used in place of valid reasoning to communicate a point with the intention to persuade. Examples in the
1065: 3267: 4061:
Baveye, Phillippe C. (2010). "Sticker Shock and Looming Tsunami: The High Cost of Academic Serials in Perspective".
7118: 6548: 5991: 5904: 5375: 4401: 4101:
Impact Factors, Journal Quality, and Communication Journals: A Report for the Council of Communication Associations
3420:
Freedman, David A. (2004). "Ecological Fallacy". In Lewis-Beck, Michael S.; Bryman, Alan; Liao, Tim Futing (eds.).
3036: 2626: 1373: 4262: 2965: 7035: 7011: 6075: 5783: 5340: 5236: 3810: 3479:; Garssen, Bart; Krabbe, Erik C. W.; Snoeck Henkemans, A. Francisca; Verheij, Bart; Wagemans, Jean H. M. (2014). 3189:
Fallacies and judgements of reasonableness, Empirical Research Concerning the Pragma-Dialectical Discussion Rules
2256: 1629:
took great pains to identify fallacies in arguments. An influential collection of texts on logic and reason, the
975: 3734:
Kornprobst, Markus (2007). "Comparing Apples and Oranges? Leading and Misleading Uses of Historical Analogies".
2927: 7123: 6937: 6805: 5934: 5778: 5618: 5086: 4922: 4878: 2382: 2033:
The post hoc fallacy assumes that because B comes after A, A caused B. It gets its name from the Latin phrase "
2011:
is a faulty conclusion that is drawn based on the absence of evidence rather than on the presence of evidence.
1841: 1478: 1129: 377: 4748: 2991: 4164: 7415: 7049: 7006: 6888: 6878: 6366: 6230: 6169: 5971: 5855: 5798: 5613: 5129: 4825: 4527: 2579: 2501: 2325: 1580: 1397: 1365: 915: 268: 97: 2122:(arguing multiple sides of an issue). This history helps explain why measurement fallacies are informed by 7235: 6746: 6708: 6673: 6398: 6139: 6055: 5720: 5710: 5660: 5634: 5410: 5284: 5251: 5152: 5134: 5034: 4883: 4865: 4377:
Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness: Empirical Research Concerning the Pragma-Dialectical Discussion
3332: 3289: 2546: 2110: 1563: 1488:
patterns that obscure the logical connections between statements. Informal fallacies may also exploit the
1474: 1401: 1324: 1159: 1035: 1025: 945: 382: 171: 7450: 7091: 6896: 6685: 6481: 6403: 6388: 6283: 6215: 6207: 6144: 6100: 6070: 6035: 5961: 5758: 5746: 5726: 5715: 5630: 5443: 5419: 5241: 5197: 5049: 4975: 4888: 4453: 2687: 2394: 2265: 2186: 2151: 2008: 1934: 1930: 1470: 1203: 1114: 1045: 905: 664: 527: 442: 339: 3551:
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences
3770: 3603: 7481: 6810: 6378: 5773: 5677: 5641: 5556: 5512: 5348: 5279: 5069: 4898: 4873: 4491: 3980: 3558: 3476: 2567: 2477: 2459: 2361: 2305: 2246: 2235: 2158: 2127: 2058: 1988: 1953: 1885: 1670:: Instead of proving something it is proving the opposite. 'Sound is eternal because it is produced'. 1500: 1442: 1109: 1099: 895: 669: 629: 372: 2189:
fallacies, to the extent that such measurements are supported by the absence of book citation data.
7387: 7214: 7138: 6873: 6703: 6491: 6408: 6345: 6095: 5651: 5550: 5497: 5473: 5396: 5299: 5231: 5157: 4970: 4965: 4942: 4917: 4645: 4620: 2543: â€“ Any process that has the aim of augmenting knowledge, resolving doubt, or solving a problem 2531: 2465: 2318: 1957: 1788: 1769: 1712: 1604: 1484:
Recognizing fallacies in everyday arguments may be difficult since arguments are often embedded in
1420: 1208: 1164: 1154: 1149: 1005: 885: 679: 344: 212: 3364: 7471: 7278: 6579: 6569: 6383: 6237: 6110: 6085: 5924: 5836: 5769: 5583: 5468: 5453: 5400: 5360: 5309: 5246: 5205: 5182: 5162: 5065: 4909: 4893: 4818: 4080: 4015: 3996: 3970: 3888: 3839: 3751: 3697: 3584: 3457: 2909: 2192: 2081: 1942: 1938: 1907: 1864: 1446: 1293: 1104: 1075: 925: 875: 804: 729: 714: 647: 605: 316: 261: 142: 124: 1631: 3859: 2450: â€“ Common response to a recurring problem that is usually ineffective or counterproductive 7491: 7310: 7295: 7222: 7016: 6698: 6340: 6179: 6159: 6127: 6008: 5986: 5941: 5909: 5655: 5492: 5482: 5458: 5435: 5391: 5317: 5269: 5227: 5187: 5029: 5024: 4846: 4680: 4666: 4607: 4579: 4548: 4536: 4499: 4479: 4461: 4393: 4380: 4361: 4345: 4315: 4301: 4234: 4033: 4025: 3940: 3911: 3880: 3831: 3790: 3689: 3648: 3625: 3576: 3525: 3502: 3492: 3425: 3386: 3378: 3368: 3192: 3131: 3078: 3068: 3042: 3013: 2874: 2864: 2759: 2703: 2667: 2483: 2429: 2403: 2388: 2294: 2218: 2168:
occurs when claims are supported by unsound comparisons between data points. For example, the
2020: 1992: 1853: 1706: 1700: 1695: 1508: 1504: 1317: 1268: 1124: 1015: 854: 849: 799: 674: 637: 598: 505: 256: 201: 30: 4228: 4224: 3125: 2534: â€“ Reason arguing against a premise, argument, or conclusion; expression of disagreement 7440: 7332: 6298: 6273: 6122: 6090: 6015: 5805: 5646: 5545: 5487: 5425: 5220: 5099: 5094: 5079: 5044: 5004: 4932: 4927: 4756: 4637: 4532: 4439: 4072: 3988: 3872: 3823: 3782: 3743: 3681: 3615: 3566: 3547:"Outline of a Theory of Statistical Estimation Based on the Classical Theory of Probability" 3484: 3003: 2901: 2695: 2606: 2332:
In humor, errors of reasoning are used for comical purposes. Groucho Marx used fallacies of
2270: 2109:
Some of the fallacies described above may be committed in the context of measurement. Where
1911: 1901: 1776: 1772: 1729: 1636: 1591: 1547: 1543: 1435: 1427: 1423: 1349: 1288: 1233: 1119: 789: 615: 334: 251: 244: 112: 107: 7425: 7274: 6906: 6693: 6457: 6293: 6105: 5526: 5502: 5322: 5294: 5274: 5122: 5090: 5074: 4765:
A web based syllogistic machine for exploring fallacies, figures, and modes of syllogisms.
4712: 4708: 4694: 4614: 3394: 3031: 2892:
McMurtry, John (December 1990). "The mass media: An analysis of their system of fallacy".
2519: 1680: 1253: 1169: 985: 844: 754: 719: 659: 554: 500: 457: 150: 5562: 5039: 4198: 3358: 4641: 3984: 3562: 7227: 6986: 6868: 6496: 6149: 5929: 5919: 5882: 5878: 5463: 5448: 5370: 5289: 5215: 4855: 4796: 4488:
Fearnside, W. Ward and William B. Holther, Fallacy: The Counterfeit of Argument, 1959.
3933: 3777:. Biases and constraints in communication: Argumentation, persuasion and manipulation. 3452: 2612: 2471: 2173: 2123: 2054: 1876: 1755: 1739: 1595: 1551: 1539: 1416: 1409: 1197: 995: 829: 724: 654: 544: 537: 397: 329: 20: 7465: 7128: 7086: 6476: 6080: 6020: 5588: 5478: 5210: 5173: 5117: 4985: 4980: 4791: 4599: 4337: 4084: 3965: 3843: 3771:"When and how do we deal with straw men? A normative and cognitive pragmatic account" 3755: 3701: 3158: 2913: 2639: 2552: 2513: 2507: 2310: 2298: 2287: 2277: 2165: 2085: 1734: 1523: 1450: 1298: 1283: 1134: 935: 794: 769: 734: 581: 549: 80: 70: 5847: 4624: 4000: 3992: 3892: 3588: 3242: 1956:
is described as making assumptions about a whole group or range of cases based on a
1937:). In the absence of sufficient evidence, drawing conclusions based on induction is 7420: 7405: 6728: 6622: 6514: 6174: 5600: 5019: 4589: 4544: 3685: 3121: 2453: 2447: 2234:
Assuming the conclusion of an argument, a kind of circular reasoning, also called "
1799: 1626: 1555: 1431: 1385: 1278: 1223: 824: 610: 465: 434: 302: 4608:
Aphorisms concerning The Interpretation of Nature and the Kingdom of Man, xxiii ff
3315: 4305: 3786: 3747: 2955:"Evaluating Arguments – Distinguishing between reasonable and fallacious tactics" 1503:
provides a different approach to understanding and classifying fallacies. In the
7400: 7290: 7260: 7021: 6501: 6486: 6330: 6045: 5996: 5966: 5793: 5570: 5507: 4690: 2810: 2699: 2341: 2337: 2213: 1303: 1263: 1238: 749: 744: 428: 418: 4768: 1884:. For a given fallacy, one must either characterize it by means of a deductive 7445: 7435: 7342: 7317: 7270: 7148: 6634: 6598: 6574: 6305: 6164: 6154: 6117: 6050: 6025: 5703: 5697: 5624: 5536: 4743: 4656: 4522: 4153:"Myth Busting and Metric Making: Refashioning the Discourse about Development" 3876: 3827: 3488: 3082: 2444: â€“ State of puzzlement or expression of doubt, in philosophy and rhetoric 2226: 2115: 1519: 1515: 1493: 1377: 955: 834: 819: 814: 593: 515: 476: 390: 281: 177: 4806:. Vol. 10 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 153–154. 4029: 3884: 3835: 3794: 3693: 3629: 3580: 3506: 3390: 3017: 2397: â€“ Systematic patterns of deviation from norm or rationality in judgment 2385: â€“ Systematic patterns of deviation from norm or rationality in judgment 2177:
uniform quality of all citations may be questioned on false analogy grounds.
7377: 7357: 7265: 7240: 7143: 7133: 6852: 6543: 6065: 5981: 5956: 5951: 5810: 5594: 5578: 5261: 4565: 2878: 2835: 2789: 2594: 2582: â€“ Error in thinking which involves under-valuing base rate information 2492: â€“ Politician or orator who panders to fears and emotions of the public 2489: 2474: â€“ Systematic pattern of deviation from norm or rationality in judgment 2333: 2147: 2097: 1996: 1941:
and fallacious. With the backing of sufficient amounts of the right type of
1792: 1575: 1559: 1462: 1405: 1393: 1381: 1361: 1273: 774: 704: 642: 574: 488: 471: 452: 447: 233: 227: 206: 188: 5740: 4444: 4132:
Garfield, Eugene (1993). "What Citations Tell us About Canadian Research".
4037: 3620: 3571: 3546: 3399: 3008: 1787:
Even non-deductive arguments can be said to be fallacious: for example, an
4810: 4785: 4739: 2280:(either-or fallacy) in which the situation is oversimplified, also called 7430: 7410: 7362: 7347: 7285: 7245: 7168: 7158: 7054: 6883: 5688: 4628: 3264:"PHIL 495: Philosophical Writing (Spring 2008), Texas A&M University" 3212: 2525: 2495: 2139: 1608: 1527: 1485: 1357: 586: 564: 482: 288: 274: 136: 119: 102: 85: 75: 65: 57: 38: 3975: 3455:(2017). "The Fallacy Fork: Why It's Time to Get Rid of Fallacy Theory". 19:"Logical error" redirects here. For logical errors in data storage, see 7337: 7327: 7322: 6713: 6584: 5976: 5914: 4270: 4076: 2905: 2588: 2573: 2540: 1780: 1489: 839: 764: 759: 709: 569: 559: 532: 295: 182: 129: 90: 7183: 4107:. Washington, D.C.: National Communication Association. Archived from 3062: 7372: 7367: 7352: 7250: 7153: 3339:(Summer 2019 ed.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University 3296:(Spring 2019 ed.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University 2992:"Denying Antecedents and Affirming Consequents: The State of the Art" 2441: 2169: 1353: 1248: 1243: 784: 779: 739: 520: 495: 423: 357: 323: 310: 221: 195: 1991:
are a broad class of informal fallacies, generically represented by
4750:
Humbug! The skeptic's field guide to spotting fallacies in thinking
6947: 4188:"Faculty Workload and Productivity: Ethnic and Gender Disparities" 3963:
Meho, Lokman I. (2007). "The Rise and Rise of Citation Analysis".
2609: â€“ Argument whose conclusion must be true if its premises are 2600: 2349: 1765: 809: 364: 350: 6848:
Media censorship and disinformation during the Gezi Park protests
4726: 2729: 2516: â€“ Incorrect proposition that forms the basis of an argument 2037:", which translates as "after this, therefore because of this". 1461:
Fallacies are types of erroneous reasoning that render arguments
7300: 7255: 6060: 3382: 1833:
is used to mean an argument that is problematic for any reason.
1213: 7187: 7075: 6441: 6262: 6196: 5893: 5851: 4814: 3363:. Vol. 1 (1st ed.). Longmans, Green, and Co. p.  3187:
van Eemeren, Frans; Garssen, Bart; Meuffels, Bert (2009). "1".
2406: â€“ List of statements that appear to contradict themselves 1791:
argument that incorrectly applies principles of probability or
1415:
Fallacies are commonly divided into "formal" and "informal". A
4795: 4634:, (also known as "Schopenhauers 38 stratagems"). gutenberg.org 4230:
Applications of Grammar: Principles of Effective Communication
3908:
Protagoras and Logos: A Study in Greek Philosophy and Rhetoric
1469:
content rather than the form of the argument. An example is a
2456: â€“ Visual representation of the structure of an argument 4555:, xv+457 pages plus addenda insert (some printings). Ch. 12. 3064:
Argumentation Theory : a Pragma-Dialectical Perspective
3041:(6th ed.), Belmont, California: Wadsworth, p. 52, 2758:. Heidelberg: Springer International Publishing. p. x. 4510:
Historians' Fallacies: Toward a Logic of Historical Thought
4496:
Thought 2 Talk: A Crash Course in Reflection and Expression
4428:"Why Fallacies Appear to Be Better Arguments than They Are" 1929:
A special subclass of the informal fallacies is the set of
1724:
Other famous methods of classifying fallacies are those of
1430:
originates in an error in reasoning other than an improper
4014:
Jensen, Michael (June 15, 2007). Riley, Michael G. (ed.).
2043:
temporal correlation does not necessarily entail causation
1768:
for "it does not follow") is a flaw in the structure of a
1646:: It is the unproved reason that results in this fallacy. 1434:. Arguments containing informal fallacies may be formally 4458:
The death of argument: fallacies in agent based reasoning
4344:, Methuen London, 1970. reprinted by Vale Press in 1998. 1594:
is an error in what the arguer is talking about, while a
4528:
The Demon-Haunted World: Science As a Candle in the Dark
4476:
Errors of Reasoning: Naturalizing the Logic of Inference
3717:"Critically Thinking About the Slippery Slope "Fallacy"" 2057:
type of argument, it must meet the requirements of that
1760:
A formal fallacy, deductive fallacy, logical fallacy or
4375:
Frans van Eemeren; Bart Garssen; Bert Meuffels (2009).
2584:
Pages displaying short descriptions of redirect targets
2557:
Pages displaying short descriptions of redirect targets
2536:
Pages displaying short descriptions of redirect targets
2399:
Pages displaying short descriptions of redirect targets
2350:
the authority and intellectual integrity of that person
1384:, unintentionally because of human limitations such as 4781:
Explain fallacies, what they are and how to avoid them
4056: 4054: 3524:(12th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc. p. 125. 2430:
Pragma-dialectics § Rules for critical discussion
1964:
Hasty generalization often follows a pattern such as:
1530:, newspaper editorials, and opinion-based news shows. 6245:
After Truth: Disinformation and the Cost of Fake News
4630:
Die Kunst, Recht zu behalten – The Art Of Controversy
4398:
Informal logic: A handbook for critical argumentation
3127:
How to Win Every Argument: The Use and Abuse of Logic
2754:
Bustamente, Thomas; Dahlman, Christian, eds. (2015).
2694:. Applied Logic Series. Vol. 32. pp. 3–23. 1400:
but also the ignorance of relevant properties of the
7114:
Countering Foreign Propaganda and Disinformation Act
2576: â€“ Statement that apparently contradicts itself 7386: 7221: 7042: 7030: 6915: 6861: 6835: 6823: 6737: 6684: 6672: 6641: 6629: 6617: 6605: 6593: 6562: 6536: 6524: 6464: 6452: 6354: 5687: 5675: 5534: 5525: 5434: 5409: 5384: 5308: 5260: 5196: 5171: 5143: 5108: 5058: 5012: 5003: 4941: 4907: 4863: 4854: 4134:
Canadian Journal of Library and Information Science
2756:
Argument types and fallacies in legal argumentation
2522: â€“ Statement contradicted by facts and reality 1585: 1566:, which is premise- and inference-based ambiguity. 6217:Dezinformatsia: Active Measures in Soviet Strategy 3932: 3858: 3809: 3736:Millennium â€” Journal of International Studies 3191:. Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2591: â€“ Teacher in ancient Greece (5th century BC) 2504: â€“ Ways in which a term may be poorly defined 2212:Diverting the argument to unrelated issues with a 1825:is the use of poor reasoning. Therefore, the term 1473:instance of the formally invalid argument form of 6769:Disinformation in the Russian invasion of Ukraine 6321:Disinformation in the Russian invasion of Ukraine 2555: â€“ Theorem for proving more complex theorems 2480: â€“ Exaggerated or irrational thought pattern 6664:Historical distortion regarding Ferdinand Marcos 3910:. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press. 2861:The new handbook of cognitive therapy techniques 2208:Examples of this include the speaker or writer: 2205:relevant evidence, that the conclusion is true. 1921:of the propositions constituting the argument". 4642:A System of Logic – Raciocinative and Inductive 3857:Talisse, Robert; Aikin, Scott F. (2006-09-01). 3811:"Straw Men, Iron Men, and Argumentative Virtue" 3422:Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods 3314:Mahamahopadhyaya Satisa Chandra Vidyabhushana. 2564: â€“ Phrase criticising misuse of statistics 2528: â€“ Distortion of the perception of reality 2324:Claiming that a lack of proof counts as proof ( 2138:The increasing availability and circulation of 1910:containing an informal fallacy may be formally 1412:depends on the context in which they are made. 4951:Affirmative conclusion from a negative premise 4358:Fallacies: classical and contemporary readings 3808:Aikin, Scott F.; Casey, John P. (2016-10-01). 3769:LewiƄski, Marcin; Oswald, Steve (2013-12-01). 2788:. Northern Kentucky University. Archived from 1829:is preferred. In informal discourse, however, 1617:"Therefore, Coriscus is different from a man." 7199: 6977:Election denial movement in the United States 5863: 4956:Negative conclusion from affirmative premises 4826: 4775:Stephen Downes Guide to the Logical Fallacies 3670:"What's Wrong with Slippery Slope Arguments?" 3424:. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. pp. 293–295. 3290:"Epistemology in Classical Indian Philosophy" 3039:: A Practical Guide to Fallacy-free Arguments 2597: â€“ Term in logic and deductive reasoning 1325: 8: 2603: â€“ Being in accord with fact or reality 2486: â€“ Analysis of facts to form a judgment 2462: â€“ Academic field of logic and rhetoric 1999:but fails to address the issue in question. 1426:that renders the argument invalid, while an 1372:Fallacies may be committed intentionally to 3939:. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Co. 3333:"Analytic Philosophy in Early Modern India" 2990:Godden, David; Zenker, Frank (2015-03-05). 2657: 2655: 2336:, for instance, to make ironic statements; 2021:List of fallacies § Informal fallacies 1686:Whately divided fallacies into two groups: 966:A Dialogue Concerning Oratorical Partitions 7206: 7192: 7184: 7072: 6681: 6649:COVID-19 misinformation in the Philippines 6449: 6438: 6351: 6259: 6193: 5890: 5870: 5856: 5848: 5684: 5531: 5406: 5009: 4860: 4833: 4819: 4811: 4421:. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press. 2690:(2004). "Who Cares About the Fallacies?". 1652:: This is the fallacy of irregular reason. 1332: 1318: 25: 4753: â€“ textbook on fallacies. scribd.com 4646:Book 5, Chapter 7, Fallacies of Confusion 4498:, New York: Automatic Press / VIP, 2005, 4443: 4233:(2nd ed.). Christian Liberty Press. 3974: 3715:Dwyer, Christopher (September 13, 2019). 3619: 3570: 3447: 3445: 3443: 3441: 3398: 3007: 2723: 2721: 2719: 1854:List of fallacies § Formal fallacies 1817:is in a sense self-contradictory because 7002:Mohamed Atta's alleged Prague connection 4356:Hans V. Hansen; Robert C. Pinto (1995). 4016:"The New Metrics of Scholarly Authority" 3483:(Revised ed.). New York: Springer. 2863:(Rev. ed.). New York: W.W. Norton. 2666:. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 74. 2498: â€“ Material supporting an assertion 2293:Making false or misleading comparisons ( 1056:Copia: Foundations of the Abundant Style 6801:Russian Institute for Strategic Studies 4769:Logical Fallacies and the Art of Debate 4098:National Communication Journal (2013). 3958: 3956: 3337:The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 3294:The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 2779: 2777: 2775: 2651: 2510: â€“ Possessing negative truth value 37: 21:Data integrity § Logical integrity 6928:Attempts to overturn the 2020 election 6719:Soviet influence on the peace movement 6316:Misinformation in the Israel–Hamas war 3182: 3180: 3178: 3176: 2640:"Why I Do Not Attend Case Conferences" 2570: â€“ Certain type of mistaken proof 2254:Identifying a false cause and effect ( 6653:ChinaAngVirus disinformation campaign 4757:List of fallacies with clear examples 3520:Copi, Irving M.; Cohen, Carl (2005). 3317:The Nyaya Sutras Of Gautama (English) 3067:. Springer International Publishing. 2928:"The Importance of Logical Fallacies" 2391: â€“ List of faulty argument types 1995:: presenting an argument that may be 1821:refers to valid reasoning, whereas a 1518:today include but are not limited to 1259:Rhetoric of social intervention model 7: 4195:NEA 1997 Almanac of Higher Education 2182:Faculty Scholarly Productivity Index 6923:1995 CIA disinformation controversy 6133:State-sponsored Internet propaganda 4732:Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy 4718:Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 4700:Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 3647:. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 3604:"The Basic Slippery Slope Argument" 3213:"Aristotle's original 13 fallacies" 2734:Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy 2304:Generalizing quickly and sloppily ( 2134:Knowledge value measurement fallacy 1974:Therefore, X is true for C, D, etc. 1716:, which are in the material group. 1558:, which is a word- or phrase-based 16:Argument that uses faulty reasoning 6394:Misinformation related to abortion 4543:, 480 pgs. 1996 hardback edition: 3215:. The Non Sequitur. March 13, 2008 2468: â€“ Informal inductive fallacy 1746:(1824) contains valuable remarks. 14: 6611:Voluntary Agency Network of Korea 6224:The KGB and Soviet Disinformation 4021:The Chronicle of Higher Education 2562:Lies, damned lies, and statistics 2421:All pages with titles containing 2411:All pages with titles containing 2180:As another example, consider the 7164:United States Information Agency 6443:Operations and events by country 5832: 5831: 4673: 4659: 4478:. London: College Publications. 3481:Handbook of Argumentation Theory 2964:. self-published. Archived from 2263:Asserting that everyone agrees ( 1419:is a flaw in the structure of a 45: 6764:Information war against Ukraine 6311:International Jewish conspiracy 6279:Congo Free State propaganda war 4763:Interactive Syllogistic Machine 4602:, the doctrine of the idols in 4151:Stein, Zachary (October 2008). 4064:Journal of Scholarly Publishing 2225:Insulting someone's character ( 1720:Other systems of classification 1679:English scholar and theologian 6992:Information Operations Roadmap 6902:Psychological Warfare Division 6472:Chinese information operations 6421:Water fluoridation controversy 5329:Correlation implies causation 4261:Boyer, Web; Stoddard, Samuel. 3686:10.1080/00455091.1982.10715799 3674:Canadian Journal of Philosophy 3602:Walton, Douglas (2015-09-02). 2015:Examples of informal fallacies 1509:normative rules of interaction 1: 7477:Barriers to critical thinking 7099:Active Measures Working Group 6757:during the Russo-Georgian War 6724:U.S. Army Field Manual 30-31B 4419:A Pragmatic Theory of Fallacy 4307:A Pragmatic Theory of Fallacy 3335:. In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). 3292:. In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). 3130:. A&C Black. p. 46. 2634:Straight and Crooked Thinking 1229:List of feminist rhetoricians 6982:The Freedom Fighter's Manual 6659:Fake news in the Philippines 6031:Fear, uncertainty, and doubt 4412:. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 3860:"Two Forms of the Straw Man" 3787:10.1016/j.pragma.2013.05.001 3748:10.1177/03058298070360010301 2356:Assessment: pragmatic theory 1219:Glossary of rhetorical terms 7109:Counter Misinformation Team 7104:Counter disinformation unit 6554:Myth of the clean Wehrmacht 6041:Forgery as covert operation 4512:, Harper Torchbooks, 1970. 4312:University of Alabama Press 3668:Govier, Trudy (June 1982). 3061:Frans van, Eemeren (2018). 2700:10.1007/978-1-4020-2712-3_1 1586: 1445:, an intentionally invalid 1066:Language as Symbolic Action 7508: 7119:The Disinformation Project 6549:Propaganda in Nazi Germany 5905:Algorithmic radicalization 5753:I'm entitled to my opinion 4570:On Sophistical Refutations 4402:Cambridge University Press 4157:Integral Leadership Review 3288:Phillips, Stephen (2019). 3235:"Aristotle's 13 fallacies" 3101:www.termpaperwarehouse.com 3037:Attacking Faulty Reasoning 2859:McMullin, Rian E. (2000). 2662:Gensler, Harry J. (2010). 2627:Attacking Faulty Reasoning 2549: â€“ Psychological term 2359: 2088:uses unsound comparisons. 2035:post hoc, ergo propter hoc 2018: 1899: 1851: 1775:that renders the argument 1753: 1390:cognitive or social biases 1356:in the construction of an 18: 7333:Parsimony (Occam's razor) 7082: 7071: 7036:Bolivarian Army of Trolls 7012:Tobacco industry playbook 6943:CIA Kennedy assassination 6448: 6437: 6269: 6258: 6203: 6192: 6076:Manipulation (psychology) 5900: 5889: 5827: 5736: 5609: 4604:Novum Organum Scientiarum 4576:. library.adelaide.edu.au 3993:10.1088/2058-7058/20/1/33 3906:Schiappa, Edward (1991). 3877:10.1007/s10503-006-9017-8 3828:10.1007/s11245-015-9308-5 3545:Neyman, J. (1937-08-30). 3489:10.1007/978-90-481-9473-5 3331:Ganeri, Jonardon (2019). 3161:. Encyclopedia Britannica 3097:"Fallacies in Propaganda" 2615: â€“ Social phenomenon 2286:Selectively using facts ( 2257:post hoc ergo propter hoc 2080:Informally known as the " 2065:giving counterarguments. 1890:post hoc ergo propter hoc 1534:Systems of classification 1505:pragma-dialectical theory 976:De Optimo Genere Oratorum 7124:East StratCom Task Force 6938:9/11 conspiracy theories 5935:List of cognitive biases 5779:Motte-and-bailey fallacy 4879:Affirming the consequent 4426:Walton, Douglas (2010). 4417:Walton, Douglas (1995). 4408:Douglas, Walton (1987). 4186:Allen, Henry L. (1997). 3645:Slippery Slope Arguments 3643:Walton, Douglas (1992). 2811:"Mathematical Fallacies" 2383:List of cognitive biases 2053:For an argument to be a 1842:affirming the consequent 1674: 1479:affirming the consequent 1438:, but still fallacious. 7050:Public opinion brigades 7007:Niger uranium forgeries 6997:Litter boxes in schools 6367:COVID-19 misinformation 6289:Free energy suppression 6198:Books and documentaries 5972:Euphemistic misspeaking 5799:Two wrongs make a right 5130:Denying the correlative 4803:EncyclopĂŠdia Britannica 4225:"Soundness of Argument" 4223:Shewan, Edward (2003). 2836:"Definition of fallacy" 2502:Fallacies of definition 2245:Making jumps in logic ( 1587:De Sophisticis Elenchis 1581:Sophistical Refutations 1471:probabilistically valid 1366:De Sophisticis Elenchis 916:De Sophisticis Elenchis 6796:2016 Brexit referendum 6145:Scientific fabrication 6056:Historical negationism 5784:Psychologist's fallacy 5721:Argument to moderation 5711:Argument from anecdote 5661:Chronological snobbery 5285:Quoting out of context 5252:Overwhelming exception 5135:Suppressed correlative 5035:Quoting out of context 4910:quantificational logic 4884:Denying the antecedent 4625:The Art of Controversy 4594:Summulae de dialectica 4445:10.22329/il.v30i2.2868 4263:"How to Be Persuasive" 3621:10.22329/il.v35i3.4286 3572:10.1098/rsta.1937.0005 3009:10.22329/il.v35i1.4173 2547:Jumping to conclusions 2111:mathematical fallacies 1989:fallacies of relevance 1931:faulty generalizations 1574:The Greek philosopher 1564:fallacy of composition 1475:denying the antecedent 1036:De doctrina Christiana 1026:Dialogus de oratoribus 946:Rhetorica ad Herennium 172:Captatio benevolentiae 7388:Theories of deduction 7092:Fact-checking website 6897:Operation Mass Appeal 6879:Clockwork Orange plot 6389:Mental illness denial 6284:Climate change denial 6101:Psychological warfare 6071:Internet manipulation 6036:Firehose of falsehood 5962:Disinformation attack 5747:The Four Great Errors 5727:Argumentum ad populum 5716:Argument from silence 5420:Argumentum ad baculum 5198:Faulty generalization 4889:Argument from fallacy 4586:(c. 1323) Part III.4. 4574:De Sophistici Elenchi 3775:Journal of Pragmatics 3522:Introduction to Logic 3477:Eemeren, Frans H. van 2932:thelogicofscience.com 2692:The Death of Argument 2395:List of memory biases 2266:argumentum ad populum 2228:argumentum ad hominem 2187:argument from silence 2152:journal impact factor 2009:argument from silence 2003:Argument from silence 1935:statistical inference 1925:Faulty generalization 1204:Communication studies 1046:De vulgari eloquentia 906:Rhetoric to Alexander 6231:Who's Who in the CIA 5765:Invincible ignorance 5571:Reductio ad Stalinum 5557:Reductio ad Hitlerum 5513:Wisdom of repugnance 5280:Moving the goalposts 5145:Illicit transference 5070:Begging the question 4991:Undistributed middle 4899:Mathematical fallacy 4874:Affirming a disjunct 4517:Thinking from A to Z 4492:Vincent F. Hendricks 4474:Woods, John (2013). 4360:. Penn State Press. 4197:: 39. Archived from 3360:The Science of Logic 2786:"Informal Fallacies" 2784:Garns, Rudy (1997). 2580:Prosecutor's fallacy 2568:Mathematical fallacy 2478:Cognitive distortion 2460:Argumentation theory 2362:Argumentation scheme 2306:hasty generalization 2236:begging the question 2193:Ecological fallacies 2159:naturalistic fallacy 2128:argumentation theory 2059:argumentation scheme 1954:Hasty generalization 1949:Hasty generalization 1886:argumentation scheme 1614:"Socrates is a man." 1501:Argumentation theory 1443:mathematical fallacy 1441:A special case is a 1404:. For instance, the 1352:or otherwise faulty 7487:Philosophical logic 7215:Philosophical logic 6933:Conspiracy theories 6874:Double-Cross System 6843:Conspiracy theories 6704:Operation INFEKTION 6492:Internet Water Army 6346:Strategy of tension 6211:by Ion Mihai Pacepa 6096:Post-truth politics 5498:Parade of horribles 5474:In-group favoritism 5300:Syntactic ambiguity 4943:Syllogistic fallacy 4866:propositional logic 4621:Arthur Schopenhauer 4167:on October 30, 2013 4163:(5). Archived from 3985:2007physics...1012M 3931:Protagoras (1972). 3563:1937RSPTA.236..333N 3357:Coffey, P. (1912). 2664:The A to Z of Logic 2532:Inference objection 2466:Association fallacy 2326:appeal to ignorance 2319:association fallacy 2200:Intentional fallacy 2105:Measurement fallacy 1713:non causa pro causa 1492:, intellectual, or 1209:Composition studies 1140:Health and medicine 1006:Institutio Oratoria 213:Eloquentia perfecta 7279:Unity of opposites 6829:HIV/AIDS denialism 6806:Trolls from Olgino 6580:Paid news in India 6570:Fake news in India 6384:HIV/AIDS denialism 6238:Merchants of Doubt 6111:Military deception 6086:Media manipulation 5925:Circular reporting 5584:Poisoning the well 5401:Proof by assertion 5376:Texas sharpshooter 5310:Questionable cause 5247:Slothful induction 5206:Anecdotal evidence 5066:Circular reasoning 4961:Exclusive premises 4923:Illicit conversion 4613:2020-02-14 at the 4519:, Routledge 1998. 4410:Informal Fallacies 4302:Walton, Douglas N. 4077:10.1353/scp.0.0074 3969:. January: 32–36. 3935:The Older Sophists 3458:Skeptical Inquirer 3239:www.logiclaw.co.uk 2906:10.1007/BF01810092 2840:www.dictionary.com 2082:apples and oranges 1943:empirical evidence 1908:deductive argument 1865:ecological fallacy 1859:Ecological fallacy 1675:Whately's grouping 1607:is different from 1548:material fallacies 1544:informal fallacies 1447:mathematical proof 1398:reasoning standard 1294:Terministic screen 1076:A General Rhetoric 606:Resignation speech 143:Studia humanitatis 125:Byzantine rhetoric 7459: 7458: 7311:List of fallacies 7296:Explanatory power 7223:Critical thinking 7181: 7180: 7177: 7176: 7067: 7066: 7063: 7062: 7017:Operation Shocker 6819: 6818: 6699:K-1000 battleship 6530:Operation Neptune 6433: 6432: 6429: 6428: 6254: 6253: 6188: 6187: 6180:Yellow journalism 6128:counterpropaganda 6009:List of fallacies 5942:Conspiracy theory 5910:Alternative facts 5845: 5844: 5823: 5822: 5819: 5818: 5759:Ignoratio elenchi 5671: 5670: 5521: 5520: 5483:Not invented here 5188:Converse accident 5110:Correlative-based 5087:Compound question 5030:False attribution 5025:False equivalence 4999: 4998: 4777:, onegoodmove.org 4681:Psychology portal 4667:Philosophy portal 4580:William of Ockham 4515:Warburton Nigel, 4394:Douglas N. Walton 4240:978-1-930367-28-9 3531:978-0-13-189834-9 3198:978-90-481-2613-2 3137:978-0-8264-9006-3 3074:978-3-319-95380-9 3048:978-0-495-09506-4 2953:DeLancey, Craig. 2765:978-3-319-16147-1 2728:Dowden, Bradley. 2484:Critical thinking 2404:List of paradoxes 2389:List of fallacies 2295:false equivalence 2240:petitio principii 2219:Ignoratio elenchi 2092:Straw man fallacy 1993:missing the point 1983:Relevance fallacy 1744:Book of Fallacies 1707:petitio principii 1701:ignoratio elenchi 1599:is, for example: 1463:logically unsound 1342: 1341: 1269:Rogerian argument 1016:Panegyrici Latini 108:The age of Cicero 7499: 7441:Platonic realism 7208: 7201: 7194: 7185: 7073: 6892:MMR autism fraud 6775:On US elections 6709:Operation Toucan 6682: 6450: 6439: 6404:anti-vaccination 6352: 6299:Holocaust denial 6274:Bermuda Triangle 6260: 6194: 6123:black propaganda 6091:Potemkin village 6016:False accusation 5992:list of websites 5891: 5872: 5865: 5858: 5849: 5835: 5834: 5806:Special pleading 5685: 5546:Appeal to motive 5532: 5508:Stirring symbols 5488:Island mentality 5426:Wishful thinking 5407: 5123:Perfect solution 5100:No true Scotsman 5095:Complex question 5080:Leading question 5059:Question-begging 5045:No true Scotsman 5010: 4933:Quantifier shift 4928:Proof by example 4861: 4835: 4828: 4821: 4812: 4807: 4799: 4736: 4722: 4713:"Informal logic" 4709:Zalta, Edward N. 4704: 4695:Zalta, Edward N. 4683: 4678: 4677: 4676: 4669: 4664: 4663: 4662: 4638:John Stuart Mill 4617:. fly.hiwaay.net 4560:Historical texts 4533:Ballantine Books 4471: 4449: 4447: 4422: 4413: 4390: 4371: 4326: 4325: 4298: 4292: 4289: 4283: 4282: 4280: 4278: 4273:on July 27, 2018 4269:. Archived from 4258: 4252: 4251: 4249: 4247: 4220: 4214: 4213: 4211: 4209: 4203: 4192: 4183: 4177: 4176: 4174: 4172: 4148: 4142: 4141: 4129: 4123: 4122: 4120: 4119: 4114:on April 4, 2016 4113: 4106: 4095: 4089: 4088: 4058: 4049: 4048: 4046: 4044: 4011: 4005: 4004: 3978: 3960: 3951: 3950: 3938: 3928: 3922: 3921: 3903: 3897: 3896: 3862: 3854: 3848: 3847: 3813: 3805: 3799: 3798: 3766: 3760: 3759: 3731: 3725: 3724: 3721:Psychology Today 3712: 3706: 3705: 3665: 3659: 3658: 3640: 3634: 3633: 3623: 3599: 3593: 3592: 3574: 3557:(767): 333–380. 3542: 3536: 3535: 3517: 3511: 3510: 3473: 3467: 3466: 3449: 3436: 3435: 3417: 3411: 3410: 3408: 3407: 3402: 3354: 3348: 3347: 3345: 3344: 3328: 3322: 3321: 3311: 3305: 3304: 3302: 3301: 3285: 3279: 3278: 3276: 3275: 3266:. Archived from 3260: 3254: 3253: 3251: 3250: 3241:. Archived from 3231: 3225: 3224: 3222: 3220: 3209: 3203: 3202: 3184: 3171: 3170: 3168: 3166: 3155: 3149: 3148: 3146: 3144: 3118: 3112: 3111: 3109: 3107: 3093: 3087: 3086: 3058: 3052: 3051: 3032:Damer, T. Edward 3028: 3022: 3021: 3011: 2987: 2981: 2980: 2978: 2976: 2970: 2959: 2950: 2944: 2943: 2941: 2939: 2924: 2918: 2917: 2889: 2883: 2882: 2856: 2850: 2849: 2847: 2846: 2832: 2826: 2825: 2823: 2821: 2807: 2801: 2800: 2798: 2797: 2781: 2770: 2769: 2751: 2745: 2744: 2742: 2740: 2725: 2714: 2713: 2684: 2678: 2677: 2659: 2585: 2558: 2537: 2426: 2416: 2400: 2041:event. That is, 1971:X is true for B. 1968:X is true for A. 1902:Informal fallacy 1896:Informal fallacy 1880:coined the term 1637:Aksapada Gautama 1635:, attributed to 1627:Indian logicians 1592:material fallacy 1589: 1552:verbal fallacies 1540:formal fallacies 1428:informal fallacy 1334: 1327: 1320: 1234:List of speeches 1081: 1071: 1061: 1051: 1041: 1031: 1021: 1011: 1001: 991: 981: 971: 961: 951: 941: 931: 921: 911: 901: 891: 881: 685:Neo-Aristotelian 252:Figure of speech 113:Second Sophistic 49: 26: 7507: 7506: 7502: 7501: 7500: 7498: 7497: 7496: 7462: 7461: 7460: 7455: 7426:Logical atomism 7382: 7275:Socratic method 7226: 7217: 7212: 7182: 7173: 7078: 7059: 7038: 7026: 6911: 6907:Zinoviev letter 6857: 6831: 6815: 6739:Post-Soviet era 6733: 6694:Active Measures 6677: 6668: 6637: 6625: 6613: 6601: 6589: 6558: 6532: 6520: 6460: 6458:Jihadunspun.com 6444: 6425: 6350: 6326:New World Order 6294:Genocide denial 6265: 6250: 6199: 6184: 6106:Memetic warfare 5896: 5885: 5876: 5846: 5841: 5815: 5789:Rationalization 5732: 5679: 5667: 5605: 5527:Genetic fallacy 5517: 5430: 5405: 5380: 5304: 5295:Sorites paradox 5275:False precision 5256: 5237:Double counting 5192: 5167: 5139: 5104: 5091:Loaded question 5075:Loaded language 5054: 4995: 4937: 4903: 4850: 4839: 4797:"Fallacy"  4790: 4725: 4707: 4688: 4679: 4674: 4672: 4665: 4660: 4658: 4655: 4648:. la.utexas.edu 4615:Wayback Machine 4562: 4508:D. H. Fischer, 4468: 4452: 4425: 4416: 4407: 4387: 4374: 4368: 4355: 4334: 4332:Further reading 4329: 4322: 4314:. p. 324. 4300: 4299: 4295: 4290: 4286: 4276: 4274: 4260: 4259: 4255: 4245: 4243: 4241: 4222: 4221: 4217: 4207: 4205: 4204:on July 7, 2015 4201: 4190: 4185: 4184: 4180: 4170: 4168: 4150: 4149: 4145: 4131: 4130: 4126: 4117: 4115: 4111: 4104: 4097: 4096: 4092: 4060: 4059: 4052: 4042: 4040: 4013: 4012: 4008: 3976:physics/0701012 3962: 3961: 3954: 3947: 3930: 3929: 3925: 3918: 3905: 3904: 3900: 3856: 3855: 3851: 3807: 3806: 3802: 3768: 3767: 3763: 3733: 3732: 3728: 3714: 3713: 3709: 3667: 3666: 3662: 3655: 3642: 3641: 3637: 3601: 3600: 3596: 3544: 3543: 3539: 3532: 3519: 3518: 3514: 3499: 3475: 3474: 3470: 3453:Boudry, Maarten 3451: 3450: 3439: 3432: 3419: 3418: 3414: 3405: 3403: 3375: 3356: 3355: 3351: 3342: 3340: 3330: 3329: 3325: 3313: 3312: 3308: 3299: 3297: 3287: 3286: 3282: 3273: 3271: 3262: 3261: 3257: 3248: 3246: 3233: 3232: 3228: 3218: 3216: 3211: 3210: 3206: 3199: 3186: 3185: 3174: 3164: 3162: 3157: 3156: 3152: 3142: 3140: 3138: 3120: 3119: 3115: 3105: 3103: 3095: 3094: 3090: 3075: 3060: 3059: 3055: 3049: 3030: 3029: 3025: 2989: 2988: 2984: 2974: 2972: 2968: 2957: 2952: 2951: 2947: 2937: 2935: 2934:. 14 March 2017 2926: 2925: 2921: 2891: 2890: 2886: 2871: 2858: 2857: 2853: 2844: 2842: 2834: 2833: 2829: 2819: 2817: 2809: 2808: 2804: 2795: 2793: 2783: 2782: 2773: 2766: 2753: 2752: 2748: 2738: 2736: 2727: 2726: 2717: 2710: 2686: 2685: 2681: 2674: 2661: 2660: 2653: 2649: 2644: 2583: 2556: 2535: 2520:False statement 2419: 2409: 2398: 2377: 2364: 2358: 2282:false dichotomy 2202: 2136: 2107: 2094: 2078: 2051: 2031: 2023: 2017: 2005: 1985: 1951: 1927: 1904: 1898: 1874: 1861: 1856: 1850: 1848:Common examples 1831:logical fallacy 1815:logical fallacy 1758: 1752: 1722: 1681:Richard Whately 1677: 1624: 1572: 1536: 1459: 1410:legal arguments 1338: 1309: 1308: 1254:Public rhetoric 1192: 1191: 1182: 1181: 1130:Native American 1095: 1094: 1085: 1084: 1079: 1069: 1059: 1049: 1039: 1029: 1019: 1009: 999: 989: 979: 969: 959: 949: 939: 929: 919: 909: 899: 889: 879: 870: 869: 860: 859: 700: 699: 690: 689: 633: 632: 621: 620: 511:Funeral oration 501:Farewell speech 458:Socratic method 414: 413: 404: 403: 166: 165: 156: 155: 61: 60: 24: 17: 12: 11: 5: 7505: 7503: 7495: 7494: 7489: 7484: 7479: 7474: 7464: 7463: 7457: 7456: 7454: 7453: 7448: 7443: 7438: 7433: 7428: 7423: 7418: 7413: 7408: 7403: 7398: 7396:Constructivism 7392: 7390: 7384: 7383: 7381: 7380: 7375: 7370: 7365: 7360: 7355: 7350: 7345: 7340: 7335: 7330: 7325: 7320: 7315: 7314: 7313: 7303: 7298: 7293: 7288: 7283: 7282: 7281: 7263: 7258: 7253: 7248: 7243: 7238: 7232: 7230: 7228:informal logic 7219: 7218: 7213: 7211: 7210: 7203: 7196: 7188: 7179: 7178: 7175: 7174: 7172: 7171: 7166: 7161: 7156: 7151: 7146: 7141: 7136: 7131: 7126: 7121: 7116: 7111: 7106: 7101: 7096: 7095: 7094: 7083: 7080: 7079: 7076: 7069: 7068: 7065: 7064: 7061: 7060: 7058: 7057: 7052: 7046: 7044: 7040: 7039: 7034: 7032: 7028: 7027: 7025: 7024: 7019: 7014: 7009: 7004: 6999: 6994: 6989: 6987:Habbush letter 6984: 6979: 6974: 6973: 6972: 6962: 6957: 6956: 6955: 6950: 6945: 6940: 6930: 6925: 6919: 6917: 6913: 6912: 6910: 6909: 6904: 6899: 6894: 6886: 6881: 6876: 6871: 6869:Bell Pottinger 6865: 6863: 6862:United Kingdom 6859: 6858: 6856: 6855: 6850: 6845: 6839: 6837: 6833: 6832: 6827: 6825: 6821: 6820: 6817: 6816: 6814: 6813: 6808: 6803: 6798: 6793: 6792: 6791: 6786: 6781: 6773: 6772: 6771: 6761: 6760: 6759: 6754: 6743: 6741: 6735: 6734: 6732: 6731: 6726: 6721: 6716: 6711: 6706: 6701: 6696: 6690: 6688: 6679: 6670: 6669: 6667: 6666: 6661: 6656: 6645: 6643: 6639: 6638: 6633: 6631: 6627: 6626: 6621: 6619: 6615: 6614: 6609: 6607: 6603: 6602: 6597: 6595: 6591: 6590: 6588: 6587: 6582: 6577: 6572: 6566: 6564: 6560: 6559: 6557: 6556: 6551: 6546: 6540: 6538: 6534: 6533: 6528: 6526: 6525:Czechoslovakia 6522: 6521: 6519: 6518: 6511: 6506: 6505: 6504: 6499: 6497:PLA Unit 61398 6494: 6489: 6484: 6479: 6468: 6466: 6462: 6461: 6456: 6454: 6446: 6445: 6442: 6435: 6434: 6431: 6430: 6427: 6426: 6424: 6423: 6418: 6417: 6416: 6411: 6406: 6396: 6391: 6386: 6381: 6376: 6375: 6374: 6372:by governments 6364: 6358: 6356: 6349: 6348: 6343: 6338: 6333: 6328: 6323: 6318: 6313: 6308: 6303: 6302: 6301: 6291: 6286: 6281: 6276: 6270: 6267: 6266: 6263: 6256: 6255: 6252: 6251: 6249: 6248: 6241: 6234: 6227: 6220: 6213: 6209:Disinformation 6204: 6201: 6200: 6197: 6190: 6189: 6186: 6185: 6183: 6182: 6177: 6172: 6167: 6162: 6157: 6152: 6147: 6142: 6137: 6136: 6135: 6130: 6125: 6115: 6114: 6113: 6108: 6098: 6093: 6088: 6083: 6078: 6073: 6068: 6063: 6058: 6053: 6048: 6043: 6038: 6033: 6028: 6023: 6018: 6013: 6012: 6011: 6001: 6000: 5999: 5994: 5989: 5979: 5974: 5969: 5964: 5959: 5954: 5949: 5939: 5938: 5937: 5930:Cognitive bias 5927: 5922: 5920:Cherry picking 5917: 5912: 5907: 5901: 5898: 5897: 5894: 5887: 5886: 5883:misinformation 5879:Disinformation 5877: 5875: 5874: 5867: 5860: 5852: 5843: 5842: 5840: 5839: 5828: 5825: 5824: 5821: 5820: 5817: 5816: 5814: 5813: 5808: 5803: 5802: 5801: 5791: 5786: 5781: 5776: 5767: 5762: 5755: 5750: 5743: 5737: 5734: 5733: 5731: 5730: 5723: 5718: 5713: 5708: 5707: 5706: 5693: 5691: 5682: 5673: 5672: 5669: 5668: 5666: 5665: 5664: 5663: 5649: 5644: 5639: 5638: 5637: 5628: 5621: 5619:Accomplishment 5610: 5607: 5606: 5604: 5603: 5598: 5591: 5586: 5581: 5576: 5575: 5574: 5567: 5566: 5565: 5548: 5542: 5540: 5529: 5523: 5522: 5519: 5518: 5516: 5515: 5510: 5505: 5500: 5495: 5490: 5485: 5476: 5471: 5466: 5461: 5456: 5451: 5446: 5440: 5438: 5432: 5431: 5429: 5428: 5423: 5415: 5413: 5404: 5403: 5394: 5388: 5386: 5382: 5381: 5379: 5378: 5373: 5371:Slippery slope 5368: 5363: 5358: 5357: 5356: 5346: 5345: 5344: 5337: 5327: 5326: 5325: 5314: 5312: 5306: 5305: 5303: 5302: 5297: 5292: 5290:Slippery slope 5287: 5282: 5277: 5272: 5266: 5264: 5258: 5257: 5255: 5254: 5249: 5244: 5239: 5234: 5225: 5224: 5223: 5218: 5216:Cherry picking 5208: 5202: 5200: 5194: 5193: 5191: 5190: 5185: 5179: 5177: 5169: 5168: 5166: 5165: 5160: 5155: 5149: 5147: 5141: 5140: 5138: 5137: 5132: 5127: 5126: 5125: 5114: 5112: 5106: 5105: 5103: 5102: 5097: 5084: 5083: 5082: 5072: 5062: 5060: 5056: 5055: 5053: 5052: 5047: 5042: 5037: 5032: 5027: 5022: 5016: 5014: 5007: 5001: 5000: 4997: 4996: 4994: 4993: 4988: 4983: 4978: 4973: 4968: 4963: 4958: 4953: 4947: 4945: 4939: 4938: 4936: 4935: 4930: 4925: 4920: 4914: 4912: 4905: 4904: 4902: 4901: 4896: 4891: 4886: 4881: 4876: 4870: 4868: 4858: 4852: 4851: 4840: 4838: 4837: 4830: 4823: 4815: 4809: 4808: 4794:, ed. (1911). 4792:Chisholm, Hugh 4788: 4783: 4778: 4772: 4766: 4760: 4759:, infidels.org 4754: 4746: 4737: 4723: 4705: 4689:Hansen, Hans. 4685: 4684: 4670: 4654: 4653:External links 4651: 4650: 4649: 4635: 4618: 4597: 4587: 4584:Summa of Logic 4577: 4561: 4558: 4557: 4556: 4520: 4513: 4506: 4489: 4486: 4484:978-1848901148 4472: 4467:978-1402026638 4466: 4450: 4438:(2): 159–184. 4432:Informal Logic 4423: 4414: 4405: 4391: 4386:978-9048126132 4385: 4372: 4367:978-0271014173 4366: 4353: 4333: 4330: 4328: 4327: 4321:978-0817307981 4320: 4310:. Tuscaloosa: 4293: 4284: 4253: 4239: 4215: 4178: 4143: 4124: 4090: 4071:(2): 191–215. 4050: 4006: 3952: 3946:978-0872205567 3945: 3923: 3917:978-0872497580 3916: 3898: 3871:(3): 345–352. 3849: 3822:(2): 431–440. 3800: 3761: 3726: 3707: 3680:(2): 303–316. 3660: 3654:978-0198239253 3653: 3635: 3614:(3): 273–311. 3608:Informal Logic 3594: 3537: 3530: 3512: 3498:978-9048194728 3497: 3468: 3437: 3431:978-0761923633 3430: 3412: 3374:978-0371778951 3373: 3349: 3323: 3306: 3280: 3255: 3226: 3204: 3197: 3172: 3150: 3136: 3113: 3088: 3073: 3053: 3047: 3023: 2996:Informal Logic 2982: 2945: 2919: 2884: 2870:978-0393703139 2869: 2851: 2827: 2802: 2771: 2764: 2746: 2715: 2709:978-9048167005 2708: 2679: 2673:978-0810875968 2672: 2650: 2648: 2645: 2643: 2642: 2637: 2630: 2617: 2616: 2613:Victim blaming 2610: 2604: 2598: 2592: 2586: 2577: 2571: 2565: 2559: 2550: 2544: 2538: 2529: 2523: 2517: 2511: 2505: 2499: 2493: 2487: 2481: 2475: 2472:Cognitive bias 2469: 2463: 2457: 2451: 2445: 2433: 2432: 2427: 2417: 2407: 2401: 2392: 2386: 2378: 2376: 2373: 2357: 2354: 2330: 2329: 2322: 2315: 2302: 2291: 2284: 2274: 2261: 2252: 2243: 2232: 2223: 2201: 2198: 2174:Web of Science 2135: 2132: 2124:informal logic 2106: 2103: 2093: 2090: 2077: 2074: 2055:slippery slope 2050: 2049:Slippery slope 2047: 2030: 2024: 2019:Main article: 2016: 2013: 2004: 2001: 1984: 1981: 1976: 1975: 1972: 1969: 1950: 1947: 1926: 1923: 1900:Main article: 1897: 1894: 1877:Maarten Boudry 1873: 1870: 1860: 1857: 1852:Main article: 1849: 1846: 1827:formal fallacy 1756:Formal fallacy 1754:Main article: 1751: 1750:Formal fallacy 1748: 1740:Jeremy Bentham 1721: 1718: 1676: 1673: 1672: 1671: 1665: 1659: 1653: 1647: 1623: 1620: 1619: 1618: 1615: 1612: 1596:verbal fallacy 1571: 1568: 1535: 1532: 1524:advertisements 1458: 1455: 1451:contradictions 1417:formal fallacy 1348:is the use of 1340: 1339: 1337: 1336: 1329: 1322: 1314: 1311: 1310: 1307: 1306: 1301: 1296: 1291: 1286: 1281: 1276: 1271: 1266: 1261: 1256: 1251: 1246: 1241: 1236: 1231: 1226: 1221: 1216: 1211: 1206: 1201: 1198:Ars dictaminis 1193: 1189: 1188: 1187: 1184: 1183: 1180: 1179: 1178: 1177: 1167: 1162: 1157: 1152: 1147: 1142: 1137: 1132: 1127: 1122: 1117: 1112: 1107: 1102: 1096: 1092: 1091: 1090: 1087: 1086: 1083: 1082: 1072: 1062: 1052: 1042: 1032: 1022: 1012: 1002: 996:On the Sublime 992: 982: 972: 962: 952: 942: 932: 922: 912: 902: 892: 882: 871: 867: 866: 865: 862: 861: 858: 857: 852: 847: 842: 837: 832: 827: 822: 817: 812: 807: 802: 797: 792: 787: 782: 777: 772: 767: 762: 757: 752: 747: 742: 737: 732: 727: 722: 717: 712: 707: 701: 697: 696: 695: 692: 691: 688: 687: 682: 677: 672: 667: 662: 657: 652: 651: 650: 640: 634: 628: 627: 626: 623: 622: 619: 618: 613: 608: 603: 602: 601: 591: 590: 589: 579: 578: 577: 572: 567: 557: 552: 547: 545:Lightning talk 542: 541: 540: 530: 525: 524: 523: 513: 508: 503: 498: 493: 492: 491: 486: 474: 469: 462: 461: 460: 450: 445: 440: 439: 438: 426: 421: 415: 411: 410: 409: 406: 405: 402: 401: 394: 387: 386: 385: 375: 370: 369: 368: 361: 354: 342: 337: 332: 330:Method of loci 327: 320: 313: 308: 307: 306: 299: 292: 285: 278: 266: 265: 264: 259: 249: 248: 247: 237: 230: 225: 218: 217: 216: 204: 199: 192: 185: 180: 175: 167: 163: 162: 161: 158: 157: 154: 153: 148: 147: 146: 134: 133: 132: 127: 117: 116: 115: 110: 100: 95: 94: 93: 88: 83: 78: 73: 66:Ancient Greece 62: 56: 55: 54: 51: 50: 42: 41: 35: 34: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 7504: 7493: 7490: 7488: 7485: 7483: 7480: 7478: 7475: 7473: 7470: 7469: 7467: 7452: 7449: 7447: 7444: 7442: 7439: 7437: 7434: 7432: 7429: 7427: 7424: 7422: 7419: 7417: 7414: 7412: 7409: 7407: 7404: 7402: 7399: 7397: 7394: 7393: 7391: 7389: 7385: 7379: 7376: 7374: 7371: 7369: 7366: 7364: 7361: 7359: 7356: 7354: 7351: 7349: 7346: 7344: 7341: 7339: 7336: 7334: 7331: 7329: 7326: 7324: 7321: 7319: 7316: 7312: 7309: 7308: 7307: 7304: 7302: 7299: 7297: 7294: 7292: 7289: 7287: 7284: 7280: 7276: 7272: 7269: 7268: 7267: 7264: 7262: 7259: 7257: 7254: 7252: 7249: 7247: 7244: 7242: 7239: 7237: 7234: 7233: 7231: 7229: 7224: 7220: 7216: 7209: 7204: 7202: 7197: 7195: 7190: 7189: 7186: 7170: 7167: 7165: 7162: 7160: 7157: 7155: 7152: 7150: 7147: 7145: 7142: 7140: 7137: 7135: 7132: 7130: 7129:FactCheck.org 7127: 7125: 7122: 7120: 7117: 7115: 7112: 7110: 7107: 7105: 7102: 7100: 7097: 7093: 7090: 7089: 7088: 7087:Fact-checking 7085: 7084: 7081: 7074: 7070: 7056: 7053: 7051: 7048: 7047: 7045: 7041: 7037: 7033: 7029: 7023: 7020: 7018: 7015: 7013: 7010: 7008: 7005: 7003: 7000: 6998: 6995: 6993: 6990: 6988: 6985: 6983: 6980: 6978: 6975: 6971: 6968: 6967: 6966: 6963: 6961: 6958: 6954: 6951: 6949: 6946: 6944: 6941: 6939: 6936: 6935: 6934: 6931: 6929: 6926: 6924: 6921: 6920: 6918: 6916:United States 6914: 6908: 6905: 6903: 6900: 6898: 6895: 6893: 6891: 6887: 6885: 6882: 6880: 6877: 6875: 6872: 6870: 6867: 6866: 6864: 6860: 6854: 6851: 6849: 6846: 6844: 6841: 6840: 6838: 6834: 6830: 6826: 6822: 6812: 6809: 6807: 6804: 6802: 6799: 6797: 6794: 6790: 6787: 6785: 6782: 6780: 6777: 6776: 6774: 6770: 6767: 6766: 6765: 6762: 6758: 6755: 6753: 6750: 6749: 6748: 6745: 6744: 6742: 6740: 6736: 6730: 6727: 6725: 6722: 6720: 6717: 6715: 6712: 6710: 6707: 6705: 6702: 6700: 6697: 6695: 6692: 6691: 6689: 6687: 6683: 6680: 6675: 6671: 6665: 6662: 6660: 6657: 6654: 6650: 6647: 6646: 6644: 6640: 6636: 6632: 6628: 6624: 6620: 6616: 6612: 6608: 6604: 6600: 6596: 6592: 6586: 6583: 6581: 6578: 6576: 6573: 6571: 6568: 6567: 6565: 6561: 6555: 6552: 6550: 6547: 6545: 6542: 6541: 6539: 6535: 6531: 6527: 6523: 6517: 6516: 6512: 6510: 6507: 6503: 6500: 6498: 6495: 6493: 6490: 6488: 6485: 6483: 6480: 6478: 6477:50 Cent Party 6475: 6474: 6473: 6470: 6469: 6467: 6463: 6459: 6455: 6451: 6447: 6440: 6436: 6422: 6419: 6415: 6412: 6410: 6407: 6405: 6402: 6401: 6400: 6397: 6395: 6392: 6390: 6387: 6385: 6382: 6380: 6377: 6373: 6370: 6369: 6368: 6365: 6363: 6360: 6359: 6357: 6353: 6347: 6344: 6342: 6339: 6337: 6334: 6332: 6329: 6327: 6324: 6322: 6319: 6317: 6314: 6312: 6309: 6307: 6304: 6300: 6297: 6296: 6295: 6292: 6290: 6287: 6285: 6282: 6280: 6277: 6275: 6272: 6271: 6268: 6261: 6257: 6247: 6246: 6242: 6240: 6239: 6235: 6233: 6232: 6228: 6226: 6225: 6221: 6219: 6218: 6214: 6212: 6210: 6206: 6205: 6202: 6195: 6191: 6181: 6178: 6176: 6173: 6171: 6168: 6166: 6163: 6161: 6158: 6156: 6153: 6151: 6148: 6146: 6143: 6141: 6138: 6134: 6131: 6129: 6126: 6124: 6121: 6120: 6119: 6116: 6112: 6109: 6107: 6104: 6103: 6102: 6099: 6097: 6094: 6092: 6089: 6087: 6084: 6082: 6081:Media culture 6079: 6077: 6074: 6072: 6069: 6067: 6064: 6062: 6059: 6057: 6054: 6052: 6049: 6047: 6044: 6042: 6039: 6037: 6034: 6032: 6029: 6027: 6024: 6022: 6021:False dilemma 6019: 6017: 6014: 6010: 6007: 6006: 6005: 6002: 5998: 5995: 5993: 5990: 5988: 5985: 5984: 5983: 5980: 5978: 5975: 5973: 5970: 5968: 5965: 5963: 5960: 5958: 5955: 5953: 5950: 5947: 5943: 5940: 5936: 5933: 5932: 5931: 5928: 5926: 5923: 5921: 5918: 5916: 5913: 5911: 5908: 5906: 5903: 5902: 5899: 5892: 5888: 5884: 5880: 5873: 5868: 5866: 5861: 5859: 5854: 5853: 5850: 5838: 5830: 5829: 5826: 5812: 5809: 5807: 5804: 5800: 5797: 5796: 5795: 5792: 5790: 5787: 5785: 5782: 5780: 5777: 5775: 5771: 5768: 5766: 5763: 5761: 5760: 5756: 5754: 5751: 5749: 5748: 5744: 5742: 5739: 5738: 5735: 5729: 5728: 5724: 5722: 5719: 5717: 5714: 5712: 5709: 5705: 5702: 5701: 5700: 5699: 5695: 5694: 5692: 5690: 5686: 5683: 5681: 5674: 5662: 5659: 5658: 5657: 5653: 5650: 5648: 5645: 5643: 5640: 5636: 5632: 5629: 5627: 5626: 5622: 5620: 5617: 5616: 5615: 5612: 5611: 5608: 5602: 5599: 5597: 5596: 5592: 5590: 5587: 5585: 5582: 5580: 5577: 5573: 5572: 5568: 5564: 5561: 5560: 5559: 5558: 5554: 5553: 5552: 5549: 5547: 5544: 5543: 5541: 5539: 5538: 5533: 5530: 5528: 5524: 5514: 5511: 5509: 5506: 5504: 5501: 5499: 5496: 5494: 5491: 5489: 5486: 5484: 5480: 5479:Invented here 5477: 5475: 5472: 5470: 5467: 5465: 5462: 5460: 5457: 5455: 5452: 5450: 5447: 5445: 5442: 5441: 5439: 5437: 5433: 5427: 5424: 5422: 5421: 5417: 5416: 5414: 5412: 5408: 5402: 5398: 5395: 5393: 5390: 5389: 5387: 5383: 5377: 5374: 5372: 5369: 5367: 5364: 5362: 5359: 5355: 5352: 5351: 5350: 5347: 5343: 5342: 5338: 5336: 5335: 5331: 5330: 5328: 5324: 5321: 5320: 5319: 5316: 5315: 5313: 5311: 5307: 5301: 5298: 5296: 5293: 5291: 5288: 5286: 5283: 5281: 5278: 5276: 5273: 5271: 5268: 5267: 5265: 5263: 5259: 5253: 5250: 5248: 5245: 5243: 5242:False analogy 5240: 5238: 5235: 5233: 5229: 5226: 5222: 5219: 5217: 5214: 5213: 5212: 5211:Sampling bias 5209: 5207: 5204: 5203: 5201: 5199: 5195: 5189: 5186: 5184: 5181: 5180: 5178: 5176: 5175: 5174:Secundum quid 5170: 5164: 5161: 5159: 5156: 5154: 5151: 5150: 5148: 5146: 5142: 5136: 5133: 5131: 5128: 5124: 5121: 5120: 5119: 5118:False dilemma 5116: 5115: 5113: 5111: 5107: 5101: 5098: 5096: 5092: 5088: 5085: 5081: 5078: 5077: 5076: 5073: 5071: 5067: 5064: 5063: 5061: 5057: 5051: 5048: 5046: 5043: 5041: 5038: 5036: 5033: 5031: 5028: 5026: 5023: 5021: 5018: 5017: 5015: 5011: 5008: 5006: 5002: 4992: 4989: 4987: 4986:Illicit minor 4984: 4982: 4981:Illicit major 4979: 4977: 4974: 4972: 4969: 4967: 4964: 4962: 4959: 4957: 4954: 4952: 4949: 4948: 4946: 4944: 4940: 4934: 4931: 4929: 4926: 4924: 4921: 4919: 4916: 4915: 4913: 4911: 4906: 4900: 4897: 4895: 4892: 4890: 4887: 4885: 4882: 4880: 4877: 4875: 4872: 4871: 4869: 4867: 4862: 4859: 4857: 4853: 4848: 4844: 4836: 4831: 4829: 4824: 4822: 4817: 4816: 4813: 4805: 4804: 4798: 4793: 4789: 4787: 4786:Fallacy Files 4784: 4782: 4779: 4776: 4773: 4770: 4767: 4764: 4761: 4758: 4755: 4752: 4751: 4747: 4745: 4741: 4738: 4734: 4733: 4728: 4724: 4720: 4719: 4714: 4710: 4706: 4702: 4701: 4696: 4692: 4687: 4686: 4682: 4671: 4668: 4657: 4652: 4647: 4643: 4639: 4636: 4633: 4631: 4626: 4622: 4619: 4616: 4612: 4609: 4605: 4601: 4600:Francis Bacon 4598: 4595: 4591: 4588: 4585: 4581: 4578: 4575: 4571: 4567: 4564: 4563: 4559: 4554: 4550: 4546: 4542: 4538: 4534: 4530: 4529: 4524: 4521: 4518: 4514: 4511: 4507: 4505: 4501: 4497: 4493: 4490: 4487: 4485: 4481: 4477: 4473: 4469: 4463: 4459: 4455: 4451: 4446: 4441: 4437: 4433: 4429: 4424: 4420: 4415: 4411: 4406: 4403: 4399: 4395: 4392: 4388: 4382: 4378: 4373: 4369: 4363: 4359: 4354: 4351: 4347: 4343: 4339: 4338:C. L. Hamblin 4336: 4335: 4331: 4323: 4317: 4313: 4309: 4308: 4303: 4297: 4294: 4288: 4285: 4272: 4268: 4264: 4257: 4254: 4242: 4236: 4232: 4231: 4226: 4219: 4216: 4200: 4196: 4189: 4182: 4179: 4166: 4162: 4158: 4154: 4147: 4144: 4139: 4135: 4128: 4125: 4110: 4103: 4102: 4094: 4091: 4086: 4082: 4078: 4074: 4070: 4066: 4065: 4057: 4055: 4051: 4039: 4035: 4031: 4027: 4024:. The Chron. 4023: 4022: 4017: 4010: 4007: 4002: 3998: 3994: 3990: 3986: 3982: 3977: 3972: 3968: 3967: 3966:Physics World 3959: 3957: 3953: 3948: 3942: 3937: 3936: 3927: 3924: 3919: 3913: 3909: 3902: 3899: 3894: 3890: 3886: 3882: 3878: 3874: 3870: 3866: 3865:Argumentation 3861: 3853: 3850: 3845: 3841: 3837: 3833: 3829: 3825: 3821: 3817: 3812: 3804: 3801: 3796: 3792: 3788: 3784: 3780: 3776: 3772: 3765: 3762: 3757: 3753: 3749: 3745: 3741: 3737: 3730: 3727: 3722: 3718: 3711: 3708: 3703: 3699: 3695: 3691: 3687: 3683: 3679: 3675: 3671: 3664: 3661: 3656: 3650: 3646: 3639: 3636: 3631: 3627: 3622: 3617: 3613: 3609: 3605: 3598: 3595: 3590: 3586: 3582: 3578: 3573: 3568: 3564: 3560: 3556: 3552: 3548: 3541: 3538: 3533: 3527: 3523: 3516: 3513: 3508: 3504: 3500: 3494: 3490: 3486: 3482: 3478: 3472: 3469: 3464: 3460: 3459: 3454: 3448: 3446: 3444: 3442: 3438: 3433: 3427: 3423: 3416: 3413: 3401: 3396: 3392: 3388: 3384: 3380: 3376: 3370: 3366: 3362: 3361: 3353: 3350: 3338: 3334: 3327: 3324: 3319: 3318: 3310: 3307: 3295: 3291: 3284: 3281: 3270:on 2008-09-05 3269: 3265: 3259: 3256: 3245:on 2018-07-18 3244: 3240: 3236: 3230: 3227: 3214: 3208: 3205: 3200: 3194: 3190: 3183: 3181: 3179: 3177: 3173: 3160: 3154: 3151: 3139: 3133: 3129: 3128: 3123: 3122:Pirie, Madsen 3117: 3114: 3102: 3098: 3092: 3089: 3084: 3080: 3076: 3070: 3066: 3065: 3057: 3054: 3050: 3044: 3040: 3038: 3033: 3027: 3024: 3019: 3015: 3010: 3005: 3001: 2997: 2993: 2986: 2983: 2971:on 2013-09-03 2967: 2963: 2956: 2949: 2946: 2933: 2929: 2923: 2920: 2915: 2911: 2907: 2903: 2899: 2895: 2888: 2885: 2880: 2876: 2872: 2866: 2862: 2855: 2852: 2841: 2837: 2831: 2828: 2816: 2815:brilliant.org 2812: 2806: 2803: 2792:on 2017-02-01 2791: 2787: 2780: 2778: 2776: 2772: 2767: 2761: 2757: 2750: 2747: 2735: 2731: 2724: 2722: 2720: 2716: 2711: 2705: 2701: 2697: 2693: 2689: 2683: 2680: 2675: 2669: 2665: 2658: 2656: 2652: 2646: 2641: 2638: 2636: 2635: 2631: 2629: 2628: 2624: 2623: 2622: 2621: 2614: 2611: 2608: 2605: 2602: 2599: 2596: 2593: 2590: 2587: 2581: 2578: 2575: 2572: 2569: 2566: 2563: 2560: 2554: 2551: 2548: 2545: 2542: 2539: 2533: 2530: 2527: 2524: 2521: 2518: 2515: 2514:False premise 2512: 2509: 2508:False (logic) 2506: 2503: 2500: 2497: 2494: 2491: 2488: 2485: 2482: 2479: 2476: 2473: 2470: 2467: 2464: 2461: 2458: 2455: 2452: 2449: 2446: 2443: 2440: 2439: 2438: 2437: 2431: 2428: 2425: 2424: 2418: 2415: 2414: 2408: 2405: 2402: 2396: 2393: 2390: 2387: 2384: 2381: 2380: 2374: 2372: 2368: 2363: 2355: 2353: 2351: 2346: 2343: 2339: 2335: 2327: 2323: 2320: 2316: 2313: 2312: 2311:secundum quid 2307: 2303: 2300: 2299:false analogy 2296: 2292: 2289: 2288:card stacking 2285: 2283: 2279: 2278:false dilemma 2275: 2272: 2268: 2267: 2262: 2259: 2258: 2253: 2250: 2249: 2244: 2241: 2237: 2233: 2230: 2229: 2224: 2221: 2220: 2215: 2211: 2210: 2209: 2206: 2199: 2197: 2194: 2190: 2188: 2183: 2178: 2175: 2171: 2167: 2166:false analogy 2162: 2160: 2155: 2153: 2149: 2146:For example, 2144: 2141: 2133: 2131: 2129: 2125: 2121: 2117: 2112: 2104: 2102: 2099: 2091: 2089: 2087: 2086:false analogy 2084:" fallacy, a 2083: 2076:False analogy 2075: 2073: 2070: 2066: 2062: 2060: 2056: 2048: 2046: 2044: 2038: 2036: 2029:(false cause) 2028: 2025: 2022: 2014: 2012: 2010: 2002: 2000: 1998: 1994: 1990: 1982: 1980: 1973: 1970: 1967: 1966: 1965: 1962: 1959: 1955: 1948: 1946: 1944: 1940: 1936: 1932: 1924: 1922: 1920: 1915: 1913: 1909: 1903: 1895: 1893: 1891: 1887: 1883: 1878: 1871: 1869: 1866: 1858: 1855: 1847: 1845: 1843: 1839: 1834: 1832: 1828: 1824: 1820: 1816: 1811: 1809: 1805: 1801: 1796: 1794: 1790: 1785: 1782: 1778: 1774: 1771: 1767: 1763: 1757: 1749: 1747: 1745: 1741: 1737: 1736: 1735:Novum Organum 1731: 1727: 1726:Francis Bacon 1719: 1717: 1715: 1714: 1709: 1708: 1703: 1702: 1697: 1693: 1689: 1684: 1682: 1669: 1666: 1663: 1660: 1657: 1656:Satpratipaksa 1654: 1651: 1650:Savyabhichara 1648: 1645: 1642: 1641: 1640: 1638: 1634: 1633: 1628: 1621: 1616: 1613: 1610: 1606: 1602: 1601: 1600: 1597: 1593: 1588: 1583: 1582: 1577: 1569: 1567: 1565: 1561: 1557: 1553: 1549: 1545: 1541: 1533: 1531: 1529: 1525: 1521: 1517: 1512: 1510: 1506: 1502: 1498: 1495: 1494:psychological 1491: 1487: 1482: 1480: 1476: 1472: 1466: 1464: 1456: 1454: 1452: 1448: 1444: 1439: 1437: 1433: 1429: 1425: 1422: 1418: 1413: 1411: 1407: 1403: 1399: 1395: 1391: 1387: 1383: 1379: 1375: 1370: 1368: 1367: 1363: 1359: 1355: 1351: 1347: 1335: 1330: 1328: 1323: 1321: 1316: 1315: 1313: 1312: 1305: 1302: 1300: 1299:Toulmin model 1297: 1295: 1292: 1290: 1287: 1285: 1284:Talking point 1282: 1280: 1279:Speechwriting 1277: 1275: 1272: 1270: 1267: 1265: 1262: 1260: 1257: 1255: 1252: 1250: 1247: 1245: 1242: 1240: 1237: 1235: 1232: 1230: 1227: 1225: 1222: 1220: 1217: 1215: 1212: 1210: 1207: 1205: 1202: 1200: 1199: 1195: 1194: 1186: 1185: 1176: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1168: 1166: 1163: 1161: 1158: 1156: 1153: 1151: 1148: 1146: 1143: 1141: 1138: 1136: 1133: 1131: 1128: 1126: 1123: 1121: 1118: 1116: 1113: 1111: 1108: 1106: 1103: 1101: 1100:Argumentation 1098: 1097: 1089: 1088: 1078: 1077: 1073: 1068: 1067: 1063: 1058: 1057: 1053: 1048: 1047: 1043: 1038: 1037: 1033: 1028: 1027: 1023: 1018: 1017: 1013: 1008: 1007: 1003: 998: 997: 993: 988: 987: 983: 978: 977: 973: 968: 967: 963: 958: 957: 953: 948: 947: 943: 938: 937: 936:De Inventione 933: 928: 927: 923: 918: 917: 913: 908: 907: 903: 898: 897: 893: 888: 887: 883: 878: 877: 873: 872: 864: 863: 856: 853: 851: 848: 846: 843: 841: 838: 836: 833: 831: 828: 826: 823: 821: 818: 816: 813: 811: 808: 806: 803: 801: 798: 796: 793: 791: 788: 786: 783: 781: 778: 776: 773: 771: 768: 766: 763: 761: 758: 756: 753: 751: 748: 746: 743: 741: 738: 736: 733: 731: 728: 726: 723: 721: 718: 716: 713: 711: 708: 706: 703: 702: 694: 693: 686: 683: 681: 678: 676: 673: 671: 668: 666: 663: 661: 658: 656: 653: 649: 646: 645: 644: 641: 639: 636: 635: 631: 625: 624: 617: 616:War-mongering 614: 612: 609: 607: 604: 600: 597: 596: 595: 592: 588: 585: 584: 583: 582:Progymnasmata 580: 576: 573: 571: 568: 566: 563: 562: 561: 558: 556: 553: 551: 550:Maiden speech 548: 546: 543: 539: 536: 535: 534: 531: 529: 526: 522: 519: 518: 517: 514: 512: 509: 507: 504: 502: 499: 497: 494: 490: 487: 485: 484: 480: 479: 478: 475: 473: 470: 468: 467: 463: 459: 456: 455: 454: 451: 449: 446: 444: 441: 437: 436: 432: 431: 430: 427: 425: 422: 420: 417: 416: 408: 407: 400: 399: 395: 393: 392: 388: 384: 381: 380: 379: 376: 374: 371: 367: 366: 362: 360: 359: 355: 353: 352: 348: 347: 346: 343: 341: 338: 336: 333: 331: 328: 326: 325: 321: 319: 318: 314: 312: 309: 305: 304: 300: 298: 297: 293: 291: 290: 286: 284: 283: 279: 277: 276: 272: 271: 270: 267: 263: 260: 258: 255: 254: 253: 250: 246: 243: 242: 241: 238: 236: 235: 231: 229: 226: 224: 223: 219: 215: 214: 210: 209: 208: 205: 203: 200: 198: 197: 193: 191: 190: 186: 184: 181: 179: 176: 174: 173: 169: 168: 160: 159: 152: 151:Modern period 149: 145: 144: 140: 139: 138: 135: 131: 128: 126: 123: 122: 121: 118: 114: 111: 109: 106: 105: 104: 101: 99: 98:Ancient India 96: 92: 89: 87: 84: 82: 81:Attic orators 79: 77: 74: 72: 69: 68: 67: 64: 63: 59: 53: 52: 48: 44: 43: 40: 36: 32: 28: 27: 22: 7421:Intuitionism 7406:Fictionalism 7305: 6889: 6824:South Africa 6811:Web brigades 6747:Cyberwarfare 6729:Useful idiot 6678:Soviet Union 6623:Fintas Group 6515:Global Times 6513: 6482:cyberwarfare 6243: 6236: 6229: 6222: 6216: 6208: 6175:Whataboutism 6170:Urban legend 6140:Quote mining 6003: 5774:Naturalistic 5757: 5745: 5725: 5696: 5680:of relevance 5623: 5601:Whataboutism 5593: 5569: 5563:Godwin's law 5555: 5535: 5418: 5411:Consequences 5392:Law/Legality 5366:Single cause 5339: 5332: 5172: 5040:Loki's Wager 5020:Equivocation 5013:Equivocation 4842: 4801: 4749: 4730: 4716: 4698: 4629: 4603: 4593: 4590:John Buridan 4583: 4573: 4545:Random House 4526: 4516: 4509: 4495: 4475: 4460:. Springer. 4457: 4435: 4431: 4418: 4409: 4397: 4379:. Springer. 4376: 4357: 4341: 4306: 4296: 4287: 4275:. Retrieved 4271:the original 4266: 4256: 4246:February 22, 4244:. Retrieved 4229: 4218: 4206:. Retrieved 4199:the original 4194: 4181: 4169:. Retrieved 4165:the original 4160: 4156: 4146: 4137: 4133: 4127: 4116:. Retrieved 4109:the original 4100: 4093: 4068: 4062: 4041:. Retrieved 4019: 4009: 3964: 3934: 3926: 3907: 3901: 3868: 3864: 3852: 3819: 3815: 3803: 3778: 3774: 3764: 3739: 3735: 3729: 3720: 3710: 3677: 3673: 3663: 3644: 3638: 3611: 3607: 3597: 3554: 3550: 3540: 3521: 3515: 3480: 3471: 3462: 3456: 3421: 3415: 3404:. Retrieved 3359: 3352: 3341:. Retrieved 3336: 3326: 3316: 3309: 3298:. Retrieved 3293: 3283: 3272:. Retrieved 3268:the original 3258: 3247:. Retrieved 3243:the original 3238: 3229: 3217:. Retrieved 3207: 3188: 3163:. Retrieved 3153: 3143:10 September 3141:. Retrieved 3126: 3116: 3104:. Retrieved 3100: 3091: 3063: 3056: 3035: 3026: 2999: 2995: 2985: 2973:. Retrieved 2966:the original 2961: 2948: 2936:. Retrieved 2931: 2922: 2900:(4): 49–66. 2897: 2893: 2887: 2860: 2854: 2843:. Retrieved 2839: 2830: 2818:. Retrieved 2814: 2805: 2794:. Retrieved 2790:the original 2755: 2749: 2737:. Retrieved 2733: 2691: 2682: 2663: 2632: 2625: 2619: 2618: 2454:Argument map 2448:Anti-pattern 2435: 2434: 2422: 2412: 2369: 2365: 2347: 2331: 2309: 2281: 2271:bandwagoning 2264: 2255: 2248:non sequitur 2247: 2239: 2227: 2217: 2207: 2203: 2191: 2179: 2163: 2156: 2145: 2137: 2120:dissoi logoi 2119: 2108: 2095: 2079: 2071: 2067: 2063: 2052: 2039: 2034: 2032: 2026: 2006: 1986: 1977: 1963: 1952: 1928: 1918: 1916: 1905: 1889: 1882:fallacy fork 1881: 1875: 1872:Fallacy fork 1862: 1838:non sequitur 1837: 1835: 1830: 1826: 1822: 1818: 1814: 1812: 1807: 1803: 1800:logical form 1797: 1786: 1762:non sequitur 1761: 1759: 1743: 1733: 1723: 1711: 1705: 1699: 1691: 1687: 1685: 1678: 1667: 1661: 1655: 1649: 1643: 1632:Nyāya SĆ«tras 1630: 1625: 1622:Indian logic 1579: 1573: 1556:equivocation 1537: 1513: 1499: 1483: 1467: 1460: 1440: 1432:logical form 1414: 1386:carelessness 1371: 1364: 1362:Aristotelian 1345: 1343: 1224:Glossophobia 1196: 1115:Constitutive 1074: 1064: 1054: 1044: 1034: 1024: 1014: 1004: 994: 984: 974: 964: 954: 944: 934: 924: 914: 904: 894: 884: 874: 698:Rhetoricians 611:Stump speech 528:Invitational 481: 466:Dissoi logoi 464: 443:Deliberative 435:Controversia 433: 396: 389: 363: 356: 349: 322: 315: 303:Pronuntiatio 301: 294: 287: 280: 273: 239: 232: 220: 211: 194: 187: 170: 141: 103:Ancient Rome 7482:Information 7401:Dialetheism 7291:Explanation 7261:Credibility 7022:Yellow rain 6642:Philippines 6502:Spamouflage 6487:Little Pink 6341:Rothschilds 6331:Red mercury 6046:Gaslighting 5997:Lying press 5967:Doublespeak 5794:Red herring 5551:Association 5232:Conjunction 5153:Composition 5050:Reification 4966:Existential 4918:Existential 4691:"Fallacies" 4632:(bilingual) 4523:Sagan, Carl 4277:December 5, 4208:October 29, 4171:October 28, 3781:: 164–177. 3465:(5): 46–51. 2894:Interchange 2739:17 February 2688:Woods, John 2342:Scott Adams 2338:Gary Larson 2276:Creating a 2214:red herring 1939:unwarranted 1570:Greek logic 1550:(content), 1304:Wooden iron 1264:Rhetrickery 1239:Oral skills 1175:Composition 1110:Contrastive 930:(c. 350 BC) 920:(c. 350 BC) 910:(c. 350 BC) 900:(c. 350 BC) 890:(c. 370 BC) 750:Demosthenes 730:Brueggemann 665:Ideological 516:Homiletics‎ 429:Declamation 419:Apologetics 269:Five canons 137:Renaissance 120:Middle Ages 7466:Categories 7446:Pragmatism 7436:Nominalism 7343:Propaganda 7318:Hypothesis 7271:Antithesis 7149:PolitiFact 7077:Opposition 6953:Sandy Hook 6752:on Estonia 6686:Soviet era 6599:Team Jorge 6575:Godi-media 6336:Reptilians 6306:Illuminati 6165:Truthiness 6155:Social bot 6118:Propaganda 6051:Half-truth 6026:False flag 5770:Moralistic 5704:Sealioning 5698:Ad nauseam 5625:Ipse dixit 5537:Ad hominem 5361:Regression 5163:Ecological 4976:Four terms 4894:Masked man 4771:, csun.edu 4744:PhilPapers 4553:039453512X 4541:0345409469 4504:8799101378 4454:John Woods 4350:0916475247 4267:Rink Works 4118:2016-02-22 4043:28 October 3406:2016-02-22 3343:2021-05-07 3300:2021-05-07 3274:2013-09-10 3249:2017-12-12 3106:4 February 3083:1048664485 2962:oswego.edu 2938:4 February 2845:2023-02-18 2820:4 February 2796:2013-09-10 2647:References 2423:Fallacious 2360:See also: 2116:Protagoras 1730:J. S. Mill 1520:propaganda 1516:mass media 1486:rhetorical 1374:manipulate 1160:Technology 1150:Procedural 970:(c. 50 BC) 956:De Oratore 820:Quintilian 815:Protagoras 670:Metaphoric 594:Propaganda 477:Epideictic 391:Sotto voce 345:Persuasion 340:Operations 282:Dispositio 178:Chironomia 7472:Fallacies 7416:Formalism 7378:Vagueness 7358:Relevance 7353:Reasoning 7266:Dialectic 7241:Ambiguity 7144:NewsGuard 7139:Logically 7134:Full Fact 7031:Venezuela 6965:Fake news 6853:AK Trolls 6544:Funkspiel 6066:Infodemic 5982:Fake news 5957:Denialism 5952:Deception 5811:Straw man 5689:Arguments 5678:fallacies 5652:Tradition 5642:Etymology 5614:Authority 5595:Tu quoque 5579:Bulverism 5349:Gambler's 5318:Animistic 5262:Ambiguity 5228:Base rate 4971:Necessity 4843:fallacies 4727:"Fallacy" 4596:Book VII. 4566:Aristotle 4342:Fallacies 4085:145424660 4030:0009-5982 3885:1572-8374 3844:145321942 3836:1572-8749 3795:0378-2166 3756:145785208 3742:: 29–49. 3702:170107849 3694:0045-5091 3630:2293-734X 3581:0080-4614 3507:871004444 3391:797892247 3159:"fallacy" 3018:0824-2577 3002:(1): 88. 2914:144780081 2730:"Fallacy" 2595:Soundness 2490:Demagogue 2334:amphiboly 2148:anchoring 2098:straw man 1892:fallacy. 1836:The term 1813:The term 1802:such as " 1793:causality 1789:inductive 1770:deductive 1732:. Bacon ( 1576:Aristotle 1562:, to the 1560:ambiguity 1490:emotional 1421:deductive 1406:soundness 1394:ignorance 1382:deception 1354:reasoning 1274:Seduction 1105:Cognitive 1093:Subfields 1020:(100–400) 775:Isocrates 715:Augustine 705:Aristotle 680:Narrative 630:Criticism 575:Philippic 489:Panegyric 472:Elocution 453:Dialectic 373:Situation 234:Facilitas 228:Enthymeme 207:Eloquence 189:Delectare 7492:Rhetoric 7431:Logicism 7411:Finitism 7363:Rhetoric 7348:Prudence 7286:Evidence 7246:Argument 7236:Analysis 7169:USAFacts 7159:StopFake 7055:Force 47 6960:COVID-19 6884:Euromyth 6635:Peñabots 6509:COVID-19 6414:COVID-19 6399:Vaccines 6264:Examples 6150:Smearing 5837:Category 5469:Ridicule 5454:Flattery 5444:Children 5341:Post hoc 5221:McNamara 5183:Accident 5158:Division 5005:Informal 4611:Archived 4456:(2004). 4404:, 1989. 4304:(1995). 4140:(4): 34. 4001:16532275 3893:15523437 3589:19584450 3400:7104938M 3383:12018756 3124:(2006). 3034:(2009), 2879:41580357 2607:Validity 2526:Illusion 2496:Evidence 2436:Concepts 2375:See also 2140:big data 2027:Post hoc 1781:premises 1773:argument 1696:sophisms 1692:material 1668:Viruddha 1609:Socrates 1605:Coriscus 1528:politics 1457:Overview 1424:argument 1378:persuade 1358:argument 1145:Pedagogy 1125:Feminist 896:Rhetoric 886:Phaedrus 880:(380 BC) 830:Richards 800:Perelman 648:Pentadic 643:Dramatic 587:Suasoria 565:Diatribe 506:Forensic 483:Encomium 448:Demagogy 317:Imitatio 289:Elocutio 275:Inventio 245:Informal 164:Concepts 91:Sophists 86:Calliope 76:Atticism 71:Asianism 39:Rhetoric 31:a series 29:Part of 7451:Realism 7338:Premise 7328:Opinion 7323:Inquiry 7306:Fallacy 7043:Vietnam 6714:Seat 12 6585:OpIndia 6537:Germany 6004:Fallacy 5977:Factoid 5915:Big lie 5656:Novelty 5631:Poverty 5493:Loyalty 5459:Novelty 5436:Emotion 5385:Appeals 5354:Inverse 5334:Cum hoc 5323:Furtive 4841:Common 4740:Fallacy 4711:(ed.). 4697:(ed.). 4535:, 1997 4038:1554535 3981:Bibcode 3559:Bibcode 3165:13 June 2975:7 March 2589:Sophist 2574:Paradox 2541:Inquiry 2413:Fallacy 1919:content 1823:fallacy 1777:invalid 1698:except 1688:logical 1662:Badhita 1644:Asiddha 1402:context 1350:invalid 1346:fallacy 1190:Related 1165:Therapy 1155:Science 1120:Digital 1000:(c. 50) 990:(46 BC) 980:(46 BC) 960:(55 BC) 950:(80 BC) 940:(84 BC) 876:Gorgias 845:Toulmin 840:Tacitus 790:McLuhan 765:Gorgias 760:Erasmus 755:Derrida 720:Bakhtin 710:Aspasia 675:Mimesis 638:Cluster 570:Eristic 560:Polemic 555:Oratory 533:Lecture 296:Memoria 240:Fallacy 183:Decorum 130:Trivium 58:History 7373:Theory 7251:Belief 7154:Snopes 6970:online 6890:Lancet 6836:Turkey 6674:Russia 6630:Mexico 6618:Kuwait 6594:Israel 6453:Canada 6409:autism 6355:Health 5987:online 5741:ClichĂ© 5676:Other 5647:Nature 5635:Wealth 5270:Accent 4856:Formal 4551:  4539:  4502:  4482:  4464:  4383:  4364:  4348:  4318:  4237:  4083:  4036:  4028:  3999:  3943:  3914:  3891:  3883:  3842:  3834:  3793:  3754:  3700:  3692:  3651:  3628:  3587:  3579:  3528:  3505:  3495:  3428:  3397:  3389:  3381:  3371:  3219:28 May 3195:  3134:  3081:  3071:  3045:  3016:  2912:  2877:  2867:  2762:  2706:  2670:  2442:Aporia 2379:Lists 2170:Scopus 1958:sample 1710:, and 1249:Pistis 1244:Orator 1170:Visual 1080:(1970) 1070:(1966) 1060:(1521) 1050:(1305) 986:Orator 926:Topics 855:Weaver 785:Lysias 780:Lucian 770:Hobbes 745:de Man 740:Cicero 538:Public 521:Sermon 496:Eulogy 424:Debate 412:Genres 358:Pathos 324:Kairos 311:Hypsos 257:Scheme 222:Eunoia 202:Device 196:Docere 7368:Rigor 6948:QAnon 6606:Korea 6563:India 6465:China 6379:Ebola 5895:Types 5503:Spite 5397:Stone 4693:. In 4202:(PDF) 4191:(PDF) 4112:(PDF) 4105:(PDF) 4081:S2CID 3997:S2CID 3971:arXiv 3889:S2CID 3840:S2CID 3816:Topoi 3752:S2CID 3698:S2CID 3585:S2CID 2969:(PDF) 2958:(PDF) 2910:S2CID 2620:Works 2601:Truth 2553:Lemma 1997:sound 1912:valid 1819:logic 1766:Latin 1436:valid 1040:(426) 1030:(102) 868:Works 835:Smith 825:Ramus 810:Plato 805:Pizan 735:Burke 725:Booth 660:Genre 655:Frame 398:Topos 383:Grand 378:Style 365:Logos 351:Ethos 335:Modes 262:Trope 7301:Fact 7256:Bias 6789:2020 6784:2018 6779:2016 6160:Spin 6061:Hoax 5946:list 5881:and 5589:Tone 5464:Pity 5449:Fear 4847:list 4549:ISBN 4537:ISBN 4500:ISBN 4480:ISBN 4462:ISBN 4381:ISBN 4362:ISBN 4346:ISBN 4316:ISBN 4279:2012 4248:2016 4235:ISBN 4210:2013 4173:2013 4045:2013 4034:OCLC 4026:ISSN 3941:ISBN 3912:ISBN 3881:ISSN 3832:ISSN 3791:ISSN 3690:ISSN 3649:ISBN 3626:ISSN 3577:ISSN 3526:ISBN 3503:OCLC 3493:ISBN 3426:ISBN 3387:OCLC 3379:LCCN 3369:ISBN 3221:2013 3193:ISBN 3167:2017 3145:2015 3132:ISBN 3108:2023 3079:OCLC 3069:ISBN 3043:ISBN 3014:ISSN 2977:2018 2940:2023 2875:OCLC 2865:ISBN 2822:2023 2760:ISBN 2741:2016 2704:ISBN 2668:ISBN 2340:and 2172:and 2126:and 2096:The 1987:The 1806:and 1728:and 1690:and 1392:and 1214:Doxa 1010:(95) 850:Vico 599:Spin 7225:and 4908:In 4864:In 4742:at 4531:". 4525:, " 4440:doi 4073:doi 3989:doi 3873:doi 3824:doi 3783:doi 3744:doi 3682:doi 3616:doi 3567:doi 3555:236 3485:doi 3365:302 3004:doi 2902:doi 2696:doi 2308:) ( 2297:or 2238:" ( 2007:An 1863:An 1742:'s 1542:or 1477:or 1408:of 1380:by 1376:or 1369:. 1289:TED 1135:New 795:Ong 7468:: 7277:, 7273:, 6362:5G 5772:/ 5654:/ 5633:/ 5481:/ 5399:/ 5230:/ 5093:/ 5089:/ 5068:/ 4800:. 4729:. 4715:. 4644:. 4640:, 4627:| 4623:, 4606:, 4592:, 4582:, 4572:, 4568:, 4547:, 4494:, 4436:30 4434:. 4430:. 4400:. 4396:, 4340:, 4265:. 4227:. 4193:. 4159:. 4155:. 4138:18 4136:. 4079:. 4069:41 4067:. 4053:^ 4032:. 4018:. 3995:. 3987:. 3979:. 3955:^ 3887:. 3879:. 3869:20 3867:. 3863:. 3838:. 3830:. 3820:35 3818:. 3814:. 3789:. 3779:59 3773:. 3750:. 3740:36 3738:. 3719:. 3696:. 3688:. 3678:12 3676:. 3672:. 3624:. 3612:35 3610:. 3606:. 3583:. 3575:. 3565:. 3553:. 3549:. 3501:. 3491:. 3463:41 3461:. 3440:^ 3395:OL 3393:. 3385:. 3377:. 3367:. 3237:. 3175:^ 3099:. 3077:. 3012:. 3000:35 2998:. 2994:. 2960:. 2930:. 2908:. 2898:21 2896:. 2873:. 2838:. 2813:. 2774:^ 2732:. 2718:^ 2702:. 2654:^ 2352:. 2269:, 2164:A 2157:A 2130:. 1844:. 1798:A 1704:, 1611:." 1526:, 1522:, 1453:. 1388:, 1344:A 33:on 7207:e 7200:t 7193:v 6676:/ 6655:) 6651:( 5948:) 5944:( 5871:e 5864:t 5857:v 4849:) 4845:( 4834:e 4827:t 4820:v 4735:. 4721:. 4703:. 4470:. 4448:. 4442:: 4389:. 4370:. 4352:. 4324:. 4281:. 4250:. 4212:. 4175:. 4161:8 4121:. 4087:. 4075:: 4047:. 4003:. 3991:: 3983:: 3973:: 3949:. 3920:. 3895:. 3875:: 3846:. 3826:: 3797:. 3785:: 3758:. 3746:: 3723:. 3704:. 3684:: 3657:. 3632:. 3618:: 3591:. 3569:: 3561:: 3534:. 3509:. 3487:: 3434:. 3409:. 3346:. 3320:. 3303:. 3277:. 3252:. 3223:. 3201:. 3169:. 3147:. 3110:. 3085:. 3020:. 3006:: 2979:. 2942:. 2916:. 2904:: 2881:. 2848:. 2824:. 2799:. 2768:. 2743:. 2712:. 2698:: 2676:. 2328:) 2321:) 2314:) 2301:) 2290:) 2273:) 2260:) 2251:) 2242:) 2231:) 2222:) 2216:( 1808:B 1804:A 1764:( 1603:" 1584:( 1333:e 1326:t 1319:v 23:.

Index

Data integrity § Logical integrity
a series
Rhetoric

History
Ancient Greece
Asianism
Atticism
Attic orators
Calliope
Sophists
Ancient India
Ancient Rome
The age of Cicero
Second Sophistic
Middle Ages
Byzantine rhetoric
Trivium
Renaissance
Studia humanitatis
Modern period
Captatio benevolentiae
Chironomia
Decorum
Delectare
Docere
Device
Eloquence
Eloquentia perfecta
Eunoia

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑