Knowledge (XXG)

Peremptory norm

Source 📝

215:(the first enforcement in world history of international norms upon individuals) and now might be considered uncontroversial. However, the language of peremptory norms was not used in connection with these trials; rather, the basis of criminalisation and punishment of Nazi atrocities was that civilisation could not tolerate their being ignored because it could not survive their being repeated. 203:
Despite the seemingly clear weight of condemnation of such practices, some critics disagree with the division of international legal norms into a hierarchy. There is also disagreement over how such norms are recognized or established. The relatively new concept of peremptory norms seems to be at odds
157:
and socialist states during the 1960s, any treaty that conflicts with a peremptory norm is void. The treaty allows for the emergence of new peremptory norms, but does not specify any peremptory norms. It does mention the prohibition on the threat of use of force and on the use of coercion to conclude
162:
A treaty is void if, at the time of its conclusion, it conflicts with a peremptory norm of general international law. For the purposes of the present Convention, a peremptory norm of general international law is a norm accepted and recognized by the international community of states as a whole as a
221:
Many large states have accepted this concept. Some of them have ratified the Vienna Convention, while others have stated in their official statements that they accept the Vienna Convention as "codificatory". Some have applied the concept in their dealings with international organizations and other
167:
The number of peremptory norms is considered limited but not exclusively catalogued. They are not listed or defined by any authoritative body, but arise out of case law and changing social and political attitudes. Generally included are prohibitions on waging
264:
The United States has subsequently banned the execution of juvenile offenders. Although not necessarily in response to the above non-binding report, the Supreme Court cited evolving international norms as one of the reasons for the ban
295:
for the prohibition against torture. It also stated that every state is entitled "to investigate, prosecute and punish or extradite individuals accused of torture, who are present in a territory under its jurisdiction". The
218:
There are often disagreements over whether a particular case violates a peremptory norm. As in other areas of law, states generally reserve the right to interpret the concept for themselves.
880: 646: 284: 113:, peremptory norms may not be violated by any state "through international treaties or local or special customs or even general customary rules not endowed with the same normative force". 915: 297: 707: 211:
Some peremptory norms define criminal offences considered to be enforceable against not only states but also individuals. That has been increasingly accepted since the
875: 905: 992: 257:
norm that "establishes eighteen years as the minimum age at which an offender can receive a sentence of death". The Commission concluded that there was a "
885: 163:
norm from which no derogation is permitted and which can be modified only by a subsequent norm of general international law having the same character.
772: 250: 700: 150: 135: 987: 573: 343: 982: 693: 742: 617:
The Michael Domingues Case: Report on the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, Report No. 62/02, Merits, Case 12.285 (2002)
443: 261:
norm not to impose capital punishment on individuals who committed their crimes when they had not yet reached 18 years of age".
946: 890: 630: 626: 604:
The Michael Domingues Case: Argument of the United States, Office of the Legal Adviser, United States Department of State,
762: 663: 200:. As an example, international tribunals have held that it is impermissible for a state to acquire territory through war. 123: 910: 895: 724: 237: 629:, Questions relating to the Obligation to Prosecute or Extradite (Belgium v. Senegal), Judgment of 20 July 2012, § 99; 951: 732: 326: 106: 977: 788: 716: 941: 249:, United States for two murders committed when he was 16 years old. Domingues brought the case in front of the 109:, which has traditionally required consent and allows the alteration of its obligations between states through 799: 173: 956: 931: 824: 348: 146:
in 1923, not mentioning peremptory norms explicitly but stating how state sovereignty is not inalienable.
306: 900: 757: 857: 804: 767: 680: 139: 841: 836: 809: 747: 189: 118: 82: 460:
M. Cherif Bassiouni. (Autumn 1996) "International Crimes: 'Jus Cogens' and 'Obligatio Erga Omnes
752: 569: 331: 169: 86: 43: 561: 870: 819: 379: 267: 212: 204:
with the traditionally consensual nature of international law considered necessary to state
116:
Discussions of the necessity of such norms could be traced back as far as 1758 (in Vattel's
51: 936: 320: 47: 253:
which delivered a non-legally binding report. The United States argued that there was no
537:
Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Article 64, May 23, 1969, 1155 U.N.T.S 331, 8
524:
Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Article 53, May 23, 1969, 1155 U.N.T.S 331, 8
447: 241:
provides an example of an international body's opinion that a particular norm is of a
971: 777: 17: 304:
that "the torturer has become, like the pirate and the slave trader before him,
279:
The prohibition of torture is a rule of customary international law regarded as
205: 154: 131: 94: 444:"Jus cogens | Definition of jus cogens in English by Oxford Dictionaries" 337: 177: 55: 685: 502:. New York: Cambridge University Press, p. 266. See also Wimbledon Case, p.25 846: 500:
Crimes Against Humanity: Historical Evolution and Contemporary Application
814: 550:
U.N. Doc. A/CONF.39/27 (1969), repinted in 63 Am. J. Int'l L. 875 (1969).
185: 70: 653:(Trial Judgement), (IT-95-17/1-T), 10 December 1998, §§ 144 and 153-57. 485:, International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, 2002, 121 245:
nature. Michael Domingues had been convicted and sentenced to death in
197: 193: 90: 78: 65:
nor how a norm reaches that status, but it is generally accepted that
831: 513:
Completing Humanity: The International Law of Decolonization, 1960-82
246: 181: 110: 74: 61:
There is no universal agreement regarding precisely which norms are
27:
Principle of international law from which no derogation is permitted
600: 598: 438: 689: 478: 476: 474: 138:
that indicate the existence of such a peremptory norm, in the
408: 402: 606:
Digest of United States Practice in International Law 2001
405: 385: 881:
International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia
647:
International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia
426: 423: 388: 285:
International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia
916:
International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals
515:(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2023), ch. 2. 429: 420: 414: 411: 399: 391: 382: 298:
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
924: 855: 786: 723: 396: 46:that is accepted by the international community of 871:International Military Tribunal (Nuremberg Trials) 101:Status of peremptory norms under international law 87:wars of aggression and territorial aggrandizement 901:Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia 876:International Military Tribunal for the Far East 701: 8: 370: 36: 886:International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda 708: 694: 686: 906:Special Panels of the Dili District Court 251:Inter-American Commission of Human Rights 151:Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties 136:Permanent Court of International Justice 360: 566:Genocide: A Comprehensive Introduction 588:Marc Bossuyt and Jan Wouters (2005). 344:List of treaties by number of parties 7: 590:Grondlijnen van internationaal recht 993:International law legal terminology 637:, no. 35763/97, § 60, ECHR 2001 XI. 592:, Intersentia, Antwerp etc., p. 92. 130:), clearly rooted in principles of 238:Michael Domingues v. United States 134:. But it was the judgments of the 25: 378: 42:) is a fundamental principle of 635:Al-Adsani v. the United Kingdom 231:Execution of juvenile offenders 988:Legal doctrines and principles 947:International humanitarian law 891:Special Court for Sierra Leone 667:, 630 F. 2d 876 (2d Cir.1980). 631:European Court of Human Rights 627:International Court of Justice 1: 651:Prosecutor v. Anto Furundzija 568:. Routledge. pp. 28–30. 562:"Is genocide ever justified?" 539:International Legal Materials 526:International Legal Materials 466:Law and Contemporary Problems 77:, enslaving in general (i.e. 911:Special Tribunal for Lebanon 896:International Criminal Court 310:, an enemy of all mankind". 952:International speech crimes 733:Customary international law 327:Customary international law 1009: 983:International criminal law 773:Convention Against Torture 717:International criminal law 942:Joint criminal enterprise 681:Jus cogens (bibliography) 487:International Law Reports 862:(in order of foundation) 498:Cherif Bassiouni. 2011. 483:Prosecutor v. Furundžija 468:. Vol. 59, No. 4, p. 68. 289:Prosecutor v. Furundžija 149:Under Article 53 of the 89:, and generally as well 800:Crimes against humanity 664:Filártiga v. Peña-Irala 302:Filártiga v. Peña-Irala 174:crimes against humanity 957:Universal jurisdiction 932:Command responsibility 825:Incitement to genocide 763:United Nations Charter 371: 349:Universal jurisdiction 165: 37: 441:for "compelling law" 307:hostis humani generis 160: 858:International courts 758:Nuremberg principles 560:Jones, Adam (2006). 805:Crime of aggression 768:Genocide Convention 810:Crime of apartheid 748:Geneva Conventions 608:, pp. 303, 310–313 119:The Law of Nations 18:International norm 978:International law 965: 964: 791:international law 753:Nuremberg Charter 743:Hague Conventions 575:978-1-134-25981-6 450:on July 17, 2011. 332:Entrenched clause 44:international law 16:(Redirected from 1000: 925:Related concepts 863: 820:Genocidal intent 710: 703: 696: 687: 668: 660: 654: 644: 638: 624: 618: 615: 609: 602: 593: 586: 580: 579: 557: 551: 548: 542: 535: 529: 522: 516: 509: 503: 496: 490: 480: 469: 463: 458: 452: 451: 446:. Archived from 436: 435: 432: 431: 428: 425: 422: 417: 416: 413: 410: 407: 404: 401: 398: 394: 393: 390: 387: 384: 374: 365: 291:that there is a 268:Roper v. Simmons 213:Nuremberg Trials 153:, championed by 105:Unlike ordinary 40: 21: 1008: 1007: 1003: 1002: 1001: 999: 998: 997: 968: 967: 966: 961: 937:Superior orders 920: 864: 861: 860: 851: 793: 790: 782: 738:Peremptory norm 719: 714: 677: 672: 671: 661: 657: 645: 641: 625: 621: 616: 612: 603: 596: 587: 583: 576: 559: 558: 554: 549: 545: 536: 532: 523: 519: 510: 506: 497: 493: 481: 472: 461: 459: 455: 442: 419: 395: 381: 377: 366: 362: 357: 321:Actio popularis 316: 277: 233: 228: 124:Christian Wolff 122:) and 1764 (in 103: 32:peremptory norm 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 1006: 1004: 996: 995: 990: 985: 980: 970: 969: 963: 962: 960: 959: 954: 949: 944: 939: 934: 928: 926: 922: 921: 919: 918: 913: 908: 903: 898: 893: 888: 883: 878: 873: 867: 865: 856: 853: 852: 850: 849: 844: 839: 834: 829: 828: 827: 822: 812: 807: 802: 796: 794: 789:Crimes against 787: 784: 783: 781: 780: 775: 770: 765: 760: 755: 750: 745: 740: 735: 729: 727: 721: 720: 715: 713: 712: 705: 698: 690: 684: 683: 676: 675:External links 673: 670: 669: 655: 639: 619: 610: 594: 581: 574: 552: 543: 530: 517: 504: 491: 470: 453: 359: 358: 356: 353: 352: 351: 346: 341: 334: 329: 324: 315: 312: 276: 273: 232: 229: 227: 224: 170:aggressive war 158:an agreement: 102: 99: 58:is permitted. 54:from which no 26: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1005: 994: 991: 989: 986: 984: 981: 979: 976: 975: 973: 958: 955: 953: 950: 948: 945: 943: 940: 938: 935: 933: 930: 929: 927: 923: 917: 914: 912: 909: 907: 904: 902: 899: 897: 894: 892: 889: 887: 884: 882: 879: 877: 874: 872: 869: 868: 866: 859: 854: 848: 845: 843: 840: 838: 837:Slave trading 835: 833: 830: 826: 823: 821: 818: 817: 816: 813: 811: 808: 806: 803: 801: 798: 797: 795: 792: 785: 779: 776: 774: 771: 769: 766: 764: 761: 759: 756: 754: 751: 749: 746: 744: 741: 739: 736: 734: 731: 730: 728: 726: 722: 718: 711: 706: 704: 699: 697: 692: 691: 688: 682: 679: 678: 674: 666: 665: 659: 656: 652: 648: 643: 640: 636: 632: 628: 623: 620: 614: 611: 607: 601: 599: 595: 591: 585: 582: 577: 571: 567: 563: 556: 553: 547: 544: 540: 534: 531: 527: 521: 518: 514: 508: 505: 501: 495: 492: 488: 484: 479: 477: 475: 471: 467: 457: 454: 449: 445: 440: 434: 376: 375: 373: 364: 361: 354: 350: 347: 345: 342: 340: 339: 335: 333: 330: 328: 325: 323: 322: 318: 317: 313: 311: 309: 308: 303: 299: 294: 290: 286: 282: 274: 272: 270: 269: 262: 260: 256: 252: 248: 244: 240: 239: 230: 225: 223: 219: 216: 214: 209: 207: 201: 199: 195: 191: 187: 183: 179: 175: 171: 164: 159: 156: 152: 147: 145: 143: 137: 133: 129: 125: 121: 120: 114: 112: 108: 107:customary law 100: 98: 96: 92: 88: 84: 80: 76: 72: 68: 64: 59: 57: 53: 49: 45: 41: 39: 34:(also called 33: 19: 778:Rome Statute 737: 662: 658: 650: 642: 634: 622: 613: 605: 589: 584: 565: 555: 546: 538: 533: 525: 520: 512: 507: 499: 494: 486: 482: 465: 456: 448:the original 369: 368: 363: 336: 319: 305: 301: 292: 288: 280: 278: 266: 263: 258: 254: 242: 236: 235:The case of 234: 220: 217: 210: 202: 166: 161: 148: 141: 127: 117: 115: 104: 66: 62: 60: 35: 31: 29: 511:Umut Özsu, 206:sovereignty 180:, maritime 155:Third World 132:natural law 128:Jus Gentium 95:refoulement 83:slave trade 81:as well as 73:, maritime 972:Categories 842:Starvation 541:679 (1969) 528:679 (1969) 489:213 (2002) 372:ius cogens 355:References 338:Erga omnes 300:stated in 293:jus cogens 287:stated in 281:jus cogens 259:jus cogens 255:jus cogens 243:jus cogens 178:war crimes 67:jus cogens 63:jus cogens 56:derogation 38:jus cogens 847:War crime 190:apartheid 142:Wimbledon 815:Genocide 649:(ICTY), 314:See also 226:Examples 222:states. 186:genocide 111:treaties 71:genocide 725:Sources 275:Torture 198:torture 194:slavery 91:torture 79:slavery 832:Piracy 572:  283:. The 247:Nevada 196:, and 182:piracy 93:, and 75:piracy 48:states 439:Latin 140:S.S. 69:bans 50:as a 570:ISBN 144:case 52:norm 464:". 367:or 271:). 126:'s 85:), 974:: 633:, 597:^ 564:. 473:^ 437:; 406:dʒ 403:oʊ 386:dʒ 208:. 192:, 188:, 184:, 176:, 172:, 97:. 30:A 709:e 702:t 695:v 578:. 462:' 433:/ 430:s 427:ʌ 424:j 421:ˌ 418:, 415:z 412:n 409:ɛ 400:k 397:ˈ 392:s 389:ʌ 383:ˌ 380:/ 265:( 20:)

Index

International norm
international law
states
norm
derogation
genocide
piracy
slavery
slave trade
wars of aggression and territorial aggrandizement
torture
refoulement
customary law
treaties
The Law of Nations
Christian Wolff
natural law
Permanent Court of International Justice
S.S. Wimbledon case
Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties
Third World
aggressive war
crimes against humanity
war crimes
piracy
genocide
apartheid
slavery
torture
sovereignty

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.