Syntactic Structures

1159:

linguistic level, there can be two items which can be understood having different meanings but they are structurally indistinguishable within that level. This is called a "constructional homonymity" . The relevant ambiguity can be resolved by establishing a higher level of linguistic analysis. At this higher level, the two items can be clearly shown having two different structural interpretations. In this way, constructional homonymities at the phonemic level can be resolved by establishing the level of morphology, and so forth. One of the motivations of establishing a distinct, higher level of linguistic analysis is, then, to explain the structural ambiguity due to the constructional homonymities at a lower level. On the other hand, each linguistic level also captures some structural similarities within the level that are not explained in lower levels. Chomsky uses this argument as well to motivate the establishment of distinct levels of linguistic analysis.

1231:

According to American linguist Frederick Newmeyer, this particular analysis won many "supporters for Chomsky" and "immediately led to some linguists' proposing generative-transformational analysis of particular phenomena". According to British linguist E. Keith Brown, "the elegance and insightfulness of this account was instantly recognized, and this was an important factor in ensuring the initial success of the transformational way of looking at syntax." American linguist Mark Aronoff wrote that this "beautiful analysis and description of some very striking facts was the rhetorical weapon that drove the acceptance of theory". He added that in Chomsky's treatment of English verbs, "the convergence of theory and analysis provide a description of facts so convincing that it changed the entire field".

1043:. A transformational rule "operates on a given string ... with a given constituent structure and converts it into a new string with a new derived constituent structure." It "may rearrange strings or may add or delete morphemes." Transformational rules are of two kinds: obligatory or optional. Obligatory transformations applied on the "terminal strings" of the grammar produce the "kernel of the language". Kernel sentences are simple, active, declarative and affirmative sentences. To produce passive, negative, interrogative or complex sentences, one or more optional transformation rules must be applied in a particular order to the kernel sentences. At the final stage of the grammar, morphophonemic rules convert a string of words into a string of 2154:, pp. 131–132: "As for the reception accorded to LSLT , there is little to say. I've already told you that I did not have the impression the reaction on the part of linguists was surprising. I offered LSLT to the MIT-Press – who refused it. Quite rightly, I think, because at that time the situation was very unfavourable for a general book on that subject, especially one by an unknown author. I also submitted a technical article on simplicity and explanation to the journal Word, at the suggestion of Roman Jakobson, but it was rejected virtually by return mail. So I had little hope of seeing any of this work published, at least in a linguistic journal." 40: 2481:, p. 548 writes: "That natural languages are indeed not systematic enough to allow formal treatment ... is ... a complaint that has been leveled against natural languages by philosophers for centuries. The work of Chomsky in generative linguistics apparently inspired much more confidence in philosophers and logicians to assert that perhaps natural languages weren't as unsystematic and misleading as their philosophical predecessors had made them out to be ... at the end of 1960s formal semantics began to flourish." 2506:: "... researchers in linguistics were beginning to formulate rules of grammar that were considerably more mathematical than before. And people began to realize that such methods are highly relevant to the artificial languages that were becoming popular for computer programming, even though natural languages like English remained intractable. I found the mathematical approach to grammar immediately appealing—so much so, in fact, that I must admit to taking a copy of Noam Chomsky's 1012: 297: 2511:

use a computer programmer's intuition! The mathematical, linguistic, and algorithmic parts of my life had previously been totally separate. During the ensuing years those three aspects became steadily more intertwined; and by the end of the 1960s I found myself a Professor of Computer Science at Stanford University, primarily because of work that I had done with respect to languages for computer programming."

452: 1122:, etc. According to Chomsky, the criteria for the "justification of grammars" are "external conditions of adequacy", the "condition of generality" and "simplicity". To choose the best possible grammar for a given corpus of a given language, Chomsky shows his preference for the "evaluation procedure" (which uses the aforementioned criteria). He rejects the "discovery procedure" (employed in 1517:. The results suggested that specific regions of the brain handle syntactic information in an abstract way. These are independent from other brain regions that handle semantic information. Moreover, the brain analyzes not just mere strings of words, but hierarchical structures of constituents. These observations validated the theoretical claims of Chomsky in 930: 2452:, p. 188, "this apparently curious analysis is rather ingenious" and "the powerful tool of different levels of structure related by transformations was particularly beguiling, since transformations appeared to offer a means of explaining the often amazingly complex relationships between the forms of sentences and their understanding." 547:"When we compare the inventories yielded at the various stages of the deduction, their size will usually turn out to decrease as the procedure goes on. If the text is unrestricted, i.e., capable of being prolonged through constant addition of further parts … it will be possible to register an unrestricted number of sentences" 1191:". By contrast, phonemic distinctness can be easily explained in a "straightforward" way and in "completely non-semantic terms" with the help of "pair tests". Chomsky also claims that a strictly formal, non-semantic framework of syntactic theory might ultimately be useful to support a parallel independent semantic theory. 563:"The fundamental aim in the linguistic analysis of a language L is to separate the grammatical sequences which are the sentences of L from the ungrammatical sequences which are not sentences of L. The grammar of L will thus be a device that generates all of the grammatical sequences of L and none of the ungrammatical ones" 386:. These are rules that refer back to themselves. He also found that there were many different ways of presenting the grammar. He tried to develop a method to measure how simple a grammar is. For this, he looked for "generalizations" among the possible sets of grammatical rules. Chomsky completed his undergraduate thesis 788:, three decades after his original review, wrote that "Judged by the objectives stated in the original manifestoes, the revolution has not succeeded. Something else may have succeeded, or may eventually succeed, but the goals of the original revolution have been altered and in a sense abandoned." As for 2510:

along with me on my honeymoon in 1961. During odd moments, while crossing the Atlantic in an ocean liner and while camping in Europe, I read that book rather thoroughly and tried to answer some basic theoretical questions. Here was a marvelous thing: a mathematical theory of language in which I could

1532:

conducted experiments to verify if the human brain uses "hierarchical structure building" for processing languages. They measured the magnetic and electric activities in the brains of participants. The results showed that " brains distinctly tracked three components of the phrases they heard." This

1162:

Chomsky then shows that a grammar which analyzes sentences up to the phrase structure level contains many constructional homonymities at the phrase structure level where the resulting ambiguities need to be explained at a higher level. Then he shows how his newly invented "transformational level" can

730:

series at Mouton. He was a Dutch linguist and a direct student of Jakobson. He was looking for monographs to publish for his series. Consequently, he visited Chomsky at MIT in 1956. With Morris Halle's (and possibly Jakobson's) mediation, Chomsky showed van Schooneveld his notes for his introductory

894:

of a language. He defines grammar as a device which produces all the sentences of the language under study. Secondly, a linguist must find the abstract concepts beneath grammars to develop a general method. This method would help select the best possible device or grammar for any language given its

1158:

In the eighth chapter titled "The explanatory power of linguistic theory", Chomsky writes a linguistic theory cannot content itself by just generating valid grammatical sentences. It also has to account for other structural phenomena at different levels of linguistic representation. At a certain

1085:(sequence of letters or sounds) of a human language. When he says a finite set of rules "generate" (i.e. "recursively enumerate") the set of potentially infinite number of sentences of a particular human language, he means that they provide an explicit, structural description of those sentences. 652:

itself, and the eventual interpretations that the rules or structures are 'cognitive', innate, or biological would have been made elsewhere, especially in the context of a debate between Chomsky and the advocates of behaviorism. But decades later, Chomsky makes the clear statement that syntactic

1126:

and supposed to automatically and mechanically produce the correct grammar of a language from a corpus). He also dismisses the "decision procedure" (supposed to automatically choose the best grammar for a language from a set of competing grammars). Chomsky thus shows preference for "explanatory

1230:

had great rhetorical effect. It combined simple phrase structure rules with a simple transformational rule. This treatment was based entirely on formal simplicity. Various linguists have described it as "beautiful", "powerful", "elegant", "revealing", "insightful", "beguiling" and "ingenious".

1207:"appeals calmly and insistently to a new conception" of linguistic science. He finds the book "lucid, convincing, syntactically daring, the calm voice of reason ... directly to the imagination and ambition of the entire field." It also bridged the "rhetorical gulf" to make the message of 2340:, p. 9, Chomksy justifies his choice of the term "generate", writing that "the term 'generate' is familiar in the sense intended here in logic, particularly in Post's theory of combinatorial systems. Furthermore, 'generate' seems to be the most appropriate translation for Humboldt's term 1179:. He concludes that the correspondence between meaning and grammatical form is "imperfect", "inexact" and "vague." Consequently, it is "relatively useless" to use meaning "as a basis for grammatical description". To support his point, Chomsky considers a similar relation between semantics and 937:

The second chapter is titled "The Independence of Grammar". In it, Chomsky states that a language is "a set ... of sentences, each finite in length and constructed out of a finite set of elements". A linguist should separate the "grammatical sequences" or sentences of a language from the

2307:: " actually does the double duty of demonstrating the "autonomy" of syntactic and phonological structure, an indication that not only can sentences be recognized as syntactically well-formed, but individual words can also be recognized as phonologically well-formed independent of semantics." 719:, published in 1956. Chomsky had already met Jakobson, a professor at Harvard University, during his fellowship years. Halle was Chomsky's graduate classmate at Harvard and then a close colleague at MIT. In 1956, Chomsky and Halle collaborated to write an article on phonology, published in a 1884:, p. 371: " was more powerful that anything ... psycholinguists had heretofore had at their disposal. was of special interest to these theorists. Many psychologists were quick to attribute generative systems to the minds of speakers and quick to abandon ... Behaviorism." 1607:

thought that Chomsky's assumptions about a well-defined grammaticality are " in practice." It brought syntax "within the purview of scientific description". He considers it a "great positive contribution to the discipline". However, he maintains that Chomsky's linguistics is overly

3191:

Nous exigeons par exemple de la théorie du langage qu'elle permettre de décrire non contradictoirement et exhaustivement non seulement tel texte français donné, mais aussi tous les textes français existant, et non seulement ceux-ci mais encore tous les textes français possibles et

983:

In the third chapter titled "An Elementary Linguistic Theory", Chomsky tries to determine what sort of device or model gives an adequate account of a given set of "grammatical" sentences. Chomsky hypothesizes that this device has to be finite instead of infinite. He then considers

734:

Chomsky then prepared a manuscript of the right size (no longer than 120 pages) that would fit the series. After revising an earlier manuscript, Chomsky sent a final version in the first week of August in 1956 to van Schooneveld. The editor had Chomsky rename the book's title to

224:". This procedure gives rise to different sentence structures. Chomsky stated that this limited set of rules "generates" all and only the grammatical sentences of a given language, which are infinite in number (not too dissimilar to a notion introduced earlier by Danish linguist 502:

formal model of language analysis which is called transformational generative grammar. It can also be said to present Chomsky's version or Chomsky's theory because there is some original input on a more technical level. The central concepts of the model, however, follow from

945:

determine whether a sentence is grammatical or not. First, a grammatical sentence need not be included in a corpus. Secondly, it need not be meaningful. Finally, it does not have to be statistically probable. Chomsky shows all three points using a nonsensical sentence

2570:, p. 83 states: "we must not promote our more or less standardized by-and-large characterization of the language to the status of a monolithic ideal, nor infer that because we can achieve a fixed characterization some such monolithic ideal exists, in the lap of 938:"ungrammatical sequences". By a "grammatical" sentence Chomsky means a sentence that is intuitively "acceptable to a native speaker". It is a sentence pronounced with a "normal sentence intonation". It is also "recall much more quickly" and "learn much more easily". 2414:, p. 68 states:"a wide variety of apparently distinct phenomena all fall into place in a very simple and natural way when we adopt the viewpoint of transformational analysis and that, consequently, the grammar of English becomes much more simple and orderly." 2439:, p. 24 wrote that “ examples of defects of phrase structure grammar were illustrated simultaneously with the demonstration that grammars containing the more powerful transformational rules can handle the same phenomena in an elegant and revealing manner.” 275:

lies in Chomsky's persuasion for a biological perspective on language at a time when it was unusual, and in the context of formal linguistics where it was unexpected. The book led to Chomsky's eventual recognition as one of the founders of what is now known as

1243:

were, by contrast, much more "confrontational". They sought to drive a "rhetorical wedge" between Chomsky's work and that of post-Bloomfieldians (i.e. American linguists in the 1940s et 1950s), arguing that the latter does not qualify as linguistic "science".

1070:. Harris was Chomsky's initial mentor. Harris used the term "transformation" to describe equivalence relations between sentences of a language. By contrast, Chomsky's used the term to describe a formal rule applied to underlying structures of sentences. 591:

school of early to mid-20th century linguists were nicknamed 'American structuralists', they essentially rejected the basic tenets of structuralism: that linguistic form is explained through meaning, and that linguistics belongs to the domain of

531:"We demand for example from the theory of language that it allow to describe correctly and exhaustively not only such given French text, but also all existing French texts, and not only these but also all possible and conceivable French texts." 1822:, p. 63 saying: "It was course notes for an undergraduate course at MIT. Van Schooneveld showed up here once and took a look at some of my course notes from the undergraduate course I was teaching and said I ought to publish it." In ( 1234:

Raymond Oenbring, a doctorate in the rhetoric of science, thinks that Chomsky "overstates the novelty" of transformational rules. He "seems to take all the credit for them" even though a version of them had already been introduced by

886:, Chomsky tries to construct a "formalized theory of linguistic structure". He places emphasis on "rigorous formulations" and "precisely constructed models". In the first chapter of the book, he gives a definition of human language 1163:

naturally and successfully function as that higher level. He further claims that any phrase structure grammar which cannot explain these ambiguities as successfully as transformational grammar does must be considered "inadequate".

1735:

are either mathematically flawed or based on incorrect assessments of the empirical data. They stated that a purely phrase structure treatment of grammar can explain linguistic phenomena better than one that uses transformations.

1093:

In the sixth chapter titled "On the Goals of Linguistic Theory", Chomsky writes that his "fundamental concern" is "the problem of justification of grammars". He draws parallels between the theory of language and theories in

969:. This German philosopher offered in 1934 the pseudo-sentence "Piroten karulieren elatisch". According to American linguist Reese Heitner, Carnap's sentence showed the autonomy of both syntactic and phonological structures. 629:. They believed that languages should be analysed based on how native speakers feel is right. How to translate this idea into a scientific statement remained a vexing issue in American linguistics for decades. Harris and 1566:

one of "only four major breakthroughs in modern linguistics". But he rapidly turned into a fierce critic of Chomskyan linguistics. By 1966, Hockett rejected " frame of reference in almost every detail". In his 1968 book

1826:, pp. 162–163), Chomsky recounted: "At the time Mouton was publishing just about anything, so they decided they'd publish it along with a thousand other worthless things that were coming out. That's the story of 2369:, p. 55 writes: "Our main point is that a linguistic theory should not be identified with a manual of useful procedures, nor should it be expected to provide mechanical procedures for the discovery of grammars" 1868:, p. 9, Chomsky writes that "When we speak of a grammar as generating a sentence with a certain structural description, we mean simply that the grammar assigns this structural description to the sentence." 1211:(a highly abstract, mathematically dense, and "forbiddingly technical" work) more palatable to the wider field of linguists. In a more detailed examination of the book, Harris finds Chomsky's argumentation in 5043:

The C. H. van Schooneveld Collection in Leiden University Library. Editorial correspondence and documents relating to Mouton & Co., The Hague, and other papers in the fields of Slavistics and linguistics

1004:. In the fifth chapter titled "Limitations of Phrase Structure Description", he claims to show that both these models are inadequate for the purpose of linguistic description. As a solution, he introduces 5674:

Pullum, Geoffrey K.; Scholz, Barbara C. (2001), "On the distinction between model-theoretic and generative-enumerative syntactic frameworks", in Philippe de Groote; Glyn Morrill; Christian Retore (eds.),

1135:

In the seventh chapter titled "Some Transformations in English", Chomsky strictly applies his just-proposed transformation-based approach on some aspects of English. He treats at length the formation of

6663: 5802:

Rebuschi, Georges (2001), "La grammaire generative du milieu des annees 70 au milieu des annees 90: du modele Standard etendu aux debuts du programme minimaliste", in S. Auroux; et al. (eds.),

401:

linguistic theory. It was a clear break with the existing tradition of language study. In 1953, Chomsky published his first paper as a scholar. In it he tried to adapt the symbol-based language of

2757: 2755: 2753: 1340:

at the center of the theory of language. Syntax was recognized as the focal point of language production, in which a finite set of rules can produce an infinite number of sentences. Subsequently,

2740: 2738: 2736: 957:

Chomsky concludes that "grammar is autonomous and independent of meaning." He adds that "probabilistic models give no particular insight into some of the basic problems of syntactic structure."

2344:, which he frequently uses, it seems, in essentially the sense here intended. Since this use of the term 'generate' is well established both in logic and in the tradition of linguistic theory." 1453:, a stridently anti-mentalistic philosopher of language, debated many times on the merit of Chomsky's linguistic theories. Many philosophers supported Chomsky's idea that natural languages are 5114: 1150:

sentences, etc. He claims in the end that transformational analysis can describe "a wide variety of ... distinct phenomena" in English grammar in a "simple", "natural" and "orderly" way.

2402:, pp. 9–10. Chomsky characterized this approach as the "Galilean Style" of inquiry which had already been applied in modern natural sciences with "great success" since the 17th century. 2196:

as a series of small monographs of the size of a large article, too interesting to get drowned in a periodical amongst other contributions and to be lost to oblivion by the current of time."

375:

that one cannot completely verify the meaning of a statement through observations. Carnap had developed a formal theory of language. It used symbols and rules that did not refer to meaning.

4255: 511:, which was published in 1943 in Danish and followed by an English translation by Francis J. Whitfield in 1953. The book sets up an algebraic tool for linguistic analysis which consists of 1631:

largely owes its good fortune of becoming the dominant theoretical paradigm in the following years to the charisma of Chomsky's intellect. Sampson writes that there are many references in

739:

for commercial purposes. The book was also pre-ordered in big numbers by MIT. These gave more incentives to Mouton to publish the book. Mouton finally published Chomsky's monograph titled

405:

to describe the syntax of a human language. During his fellowship, Chomsky organized all his ideas into a huge manuscript. It was around 1,000 typewritten pages long. He gave it the title

2108:, p. 116 writes: " Goodman's pro-simplicity arguments ... the task of creating ... a simplicity measure is precisely the one Chomsky sets for himself in Chapter 4 of 2357:, p. 8, Chomsky writes that "by a generative grammar I mean simply a system of rules that in some explicit and well-defined way assigns structural descriptions to sentences." 2469:, p. ix), American linguist David Lightfoot wrote that "this ingenious transformation...avoided hopelessly complex phrase structure rules and yielded an elegant account... ” 950:." He writes that the sentence is instinctively "grammatical" to a native English speaker. But it is not included in any known corpus at the time and is neither meaningful nor 731:

linguistics course for undergraduate students. Van Schooneveld took an interest in them. He offered to publish an elaborate version of them at Mouton, to which Chomsky agreed.

200:. In it, Chomsky introduced his idea of a transformational generative grammar, succinctly synthesizing and integrating the concepts of transformation (pioneered by his mentor 4122: 2019:, Chomsky writes that “My introduction to the field of linguistics was in 1947, when Zellig Harris gave me the proofs of his 'Methods in Structural Linguistics' to read." 760:, a colleague of Chomsky's at MIT, the opportunity to write a review of the book. Lees's very positive essay-length review appeared in the July–September 1957 issue of 6344: 169:

of about a hundred pages, it is recognized as one of the most significant and influential linguistic studies of the 20th century. It contains the now-famous sentence "

1359:

is that it shifted the linguistic research methodology to abstract, rationalist theory-making based on contacts with data, which is the "common scientific practice".

6813: 1595:

and cultural transmission, are themselves poorly defined. Hockett also opposed Chomsky's hypothesis that syntax is completely independent of the study of meaning.

543:

Hjelmslev also points out that an algorithmic description of a language could generate an infinite number of products from a finite number of primitive elements:

2124:, p. 5 states: "We want the reduction of the number of elements and statements, any generalizations ... to increase the total simplicity of the grammar" 772:" in the discipline. Later, some linguists began to question whether this was really a revolutionary breakthrough. A critical and elaborate account is given in 382:

or sound forms of sentences. To this end, he organized Harris's methods in a different way. To describe sentence forms and structures, he came up with a set of

1239:

in a previous work. He writes that Chomsky himself was "cautious" to "display deference" to prevailing linguistic research. His enthusiastic followers such as

1355:, linguistic research was overly preoccupied with creating hierarchies and categories of all observable language data. One of the "lasting contributions" of 3223:

Grâce aux connaissances linguistiques ainsi acquises, nous pourrons construire, pour une même langue, tous les textes concevables ou théoriquement possibles.

2523:, p. 648 writes:" had a huge, lasting influence on pure computer science" and that they are cited in "virtually every introduction to compiler design". 280:. Some specialists have questioned Chomsky's theory, believing it is wrong to describe language as an ideal system. They also say it gives less value to the 2940: 1764: 802:

series. It was the series's bestselling book. It was reprinted 13 times until 1978. In 1962, a Russian translation by Konstantin Ivanovich Babisky, titled

2641: 665:

In 1955, Chomsky had a doctorate in linguistics. Even so, he struggled at first to publish his theory and views on language. He offered the manuscript of

633:

justified analyzing the object as part of the verb phrase per 'economy'; but this term, again, merely suggested the perceived 'easiness' of the practice.

6467: 1663:

boldly claims that "it is impossible, not just difficult" for finite-state devices to generate all grammatical sentences of English, and then alludes to

667: 539:"Thanks to the linguistic knowledge thus acquired, we will be able to construct, for the same language, all conceivable or theoretically possible texts." 407: 121: 2286:: "What has happened in linguistics since Chomsky appeared on the scene almost perfectly fits Kuhn's description of how a scientific revolution works." 2209:, p. 7, Peter de Ridder, the managing director of Mouton, wrote to van Schooneveld that "new titles in the series no bigger than about 120 pages." 6321: 2914: 2605: 2493:

writes: "Recent work by Chomsky and others is doing much to bring the complexities of natural languages within the scope of serious semantic theory".

6928: 6623: 5513:

Pallier, Christophe; Devauchelle, Anne-Dominique; Dehaene, Stanislas (2011), "Cortical representation of the constituent structure of sentences",

4263: 685:. So he remained an outsider to the field of linguistics. His reviews and articles at the time were mostly published in non-linguistic journals. 1897:, p. , Hjelmslev and other European linguists, in contrast, had considered the generative calculus as perfectly non-psychological. See also 173:", which Chomsky offered as an example of a grammatically correct sentence that has no discernible meaning, thus arguing for the independence of 1683:

is "highly overstated". For him, it "does not properly credit the earlier literature on which it draws". He shows in detail how the approach in

1414:

reality. Chomsky's argument had a forceful impact on psycholinguistic research. It changed the course of the discipline in the following years.

288:

is credited to have changed the course of linguistics in general and American linguistics in particular in the second half of the 20th century.

6300: 5163:

Joseph, J. E. (2001), "The exportation of structuralist ideas from linguistics to other ideas: An overview", in S. Auroux; et al. (eds.),

1513:

In 2011, a group of French neuroscientists conducted research to verify if actual brain mechanisms worked in the way that Chomsky suggested in

989: 7025: 6336: 5978: 5957: 5914: 5708: 5432: 5142: 5124: 5050: 4919: 4813: 4773: 4746: 4728: 4651: 4631: 4563: 4451: 4410: 4382: 4357: 2527:, p. 9 states that "Chomsky's notion of a context-free grammar ... has aided immensely the specification of programming languages." 1616:

judgments about their own language. Consequently, language data empirically observed by impersonal third parties are given less importance.

947: 924: 899:. Finally, a linguistic theory must give a satisfactory description of all the levels of language analysis. Examples of these levels include 419: 398: 189: 170: 6272: 6017: 6537: 2588: 2584: 535:

When this work is done to a satisfactory level, it will also become possible to predict all the grammatical sentences of a given language:

2278:

remarked that "a revolution of the kind Kuhn describes has recently taken place in linguistics – dating from the publication of Chomsky's

2044:, p. 24 writes: "Chomsky has said that he was convinced from his days as a student of Goodman's that there is no inductive learning." 576:

Chomsky likewise states that a recursive device such as closed loops would allow the grammar to generate an infinite number of sentences.

6643: 6528: 6389: 6351: 1265:

posed a fundamental challenge to the established way of doing linguistic research. He stated that it had the potential to accomplish "a

1005: 6908: 6849: 6477: 5452: 4939: 4823: 6507: 6136: 6040: 6007: 5836: 5381: 5255: 5202: 5181: 5000: 4986: 4795: 3291: 2724: 6744: 4372: 4347: 965:

British linguist Marcus Tomalin stated that a version of "Colorless green ideas sleep furiously" was suggested decades earlier by

6898: 1266: 707:

or the "Gate of Languages." It was intended to be a series of "small monographs" on general linguistics. The first volume of the

520: 5224: 4886:

Dillinger, Mike; Palácio, Adair (1997), "Lingüística gerativa: Desenvolvimento e Perspectivas uma Entrevista com Noam Chomsky",

3137:

Garvin, Paul J. (1954). "Review of Prolegomena to a Theory of Language by Louis Hjelmslev, translated by Francis J. Whitfield".

39: 7030: 6831: 6399: 6145:

van Schooneveld, Cornelis H. (2001), "A brief comment re Jan Noordegraaf's "On the publication date of Syntactic Structures"",

5268: 4641: 2056:, p. 33 writes: "Quine's critiques of logical empiricism also gave some reason to believe that might be a plausible one." 1537:

of linguistic structures: words, phrases, and then sentences—at the same time." These results bore out Chomsky's hypothesis in

1332:

theory of language was possible. Chomsky demonstrated this possibility in a practical sense by formally treating a fragment of

1175:

and non-semantic." He then offers many counterexamples to refute some common linguistic assertions about grammar's reliance on

462: 142: 7020: 6938: 6673: 6557: 3216: 3184: 2898: 2859: 2234:, p. 7 mentions De Ridder writing to van Schooneveld that "I am convinced that the book will sell well with this title." 1778:

was also featured in a list of 100 best English language non-fiction books since 1923 picked by the American weekly magazine

1001: 5626: 4608:(in Russian), vol. 2, translated by Babisky, Konstantin Ivanovich, Moscow: Izd-vo Inostr. Literatury, pp. 412–527 4604:

Chomsky, Noam (1962), "Синтакси́ческие структу́ры (Sintaksychyeskiye Struktury)", in Vladimir Andreevich Zveginchev (ed.),

6448: 4855: 2554: 1591:

is, in reality, a well-defined underlying system. The sources that give rise to language faculty in humans, e.g. physical

1555: 1281:

commented in 1964 that most of the "syntactic conceptions prevalent in the United States" were "versions of the theory of

6918: 2218:

A scan of Chomsky's own typewritten letter dated 5 August 1956 to Mouton editor Cornelis van Schooneveld can be found in

784:

has had profound effects, both intellectually for the study of language and sociologically for the field of linguistic",

7040: 6878: 6724: 6429: 621:

Despite the paradigm shift, American linguists maintained Wundt's syntactic analysis which entails the placement of the

618:

chain. Chomsky, like Harris and other American linguists, agreed that there is no causal link from semantics to syntax.

228:). Although not explicitly stated in the book itself, this way of study was later interpreted to have valued language's 6998: 1457:

and syntactically rule-governed. They also believed in the existence of rules in the human mind which bind meanings to

1187:

distinction based on meaning would entail "complex", "exhaustive" and "laborious investigation" of an "immense", "vast

5695:, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6149, Berlin Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 238–254, 5014: 1806:, p. 103:"...such semantic notions as reference, significance, and synonymity played no role in the discussion." 1441:". He credited it with producing not only a "revolution in linguistics", but also having a "revolutionary effect" on " 1095: 1855:, p. 102: "In §§3-7 we outlined the development of some fundamental linguistic concepts in purely formal terms." 6293: 4965:

Harris, Randy Allen (1989), "Argumentation in Chomsky's syntactic structures: An exercise in rhetoric of science",

2847: 2606:

https://web.archive.org/web/20040821111702/http://www.cogsci.umn.edu/OLD/calendar/past_events/millennium/final.html

2592: 2096:, p. 125 states: "The most significant discontinuity is Chomsky's inversion of Harris's analytic procedures." 645: 427: 356: 317: 220:, which break down sentences into smaller parts. These are combined with a new kind of rules which Chomsky called " 5250:, Routledge Studies in the History of Linguistics 5, London & New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 1171:

In the ninth chapter titled "Syntax and Semantics", Chomsky reminds that his analysis so far has been "completely

1011: 6439: 2951: 1756:

was ranked number one on this list, marking it as the most influential work of cognitive science of the century.

1695:. But "few linguists are aware of this, because Post's papers are not cited." Pullum adds that the use of formal 1082: 474: 6633: 5497: 1380:

perspective in linguistic analysis. Shortly after its publication, in 1959, Chomsky wrote a critical review of

1341: 1282: 1140: 1077:. Post wanted to "mechanically inferences from an initial axiomatic sentence". Chomsky applied Post's work on 997: 978: 951: 904: 747: 372: 221: 5746: 4038: 6840: 6457: 5762: 5229:, CSLI Lecture Notes, Stanford, California: Center for the Study of Language and Information, archived from 4992: 2068:

states that among non-American philosophers, it was only Rudolf Carnap whom Chomsky read as a student (p. 3)

1745: 1462: 1450: 1310: 1127:

depth" with some "empirical inadequacies" over the pursuit of very detailed empirical coverage of all data.

862: 648:

however points out in his introduction to the second edition that there were few points of true interest in

364: 2918: 644:

which meant that the generative calculus is merely a tool for the linguist and not a structure in reality.

6613: 6106: 5264: 1454: 1426: 1406:

model. He argued that humans produce language using separate syntactic and semantic components inside the

1377: 1297:

wrote in 1966 that "no work has had a greater influence upon the current linguistic theory than Chomsky's

1240: 1123: 1028: 757: 607: 603: 423: 233: 217: 615: 7035: 6858: 6704: 6580: 6487: 6409: 6286: 5584:

Post, Emil Leon (1944), "Recursively enumerable sets of positive integers and their decision problems",

5334: 2549: 2381:, pp. 76 notes that "the fullest and most interesting expression of 'discovery procedure' is book 2029: 1395: 1294: 1176: 1024: 584: 182: 5462: 2604:

See the list of the 100 most influential works in cognitive science from the 20th century online here:

1830:: course notes for undergraduate science students published by accident in Europe." The publication of 1651:

lurking in the background. In turn, the acceptance of Chomsky's future works rested on the success of

6804: 6653: 6570: 6547: 6219: 5907:

The 100 most influential books ever written : the history of thought from ancient times to today

4683: 2262:

considers Lees to be "Chomsky's explicator". Chomsky himself considers Lees's review "provocative." (

1769: 1728: 1592: 1391: 985: 836: 6111: 5889: 1752:

from the 20th century. In total, 305 scholarly works and one movie were nominated via the internet.

1433:

called it a "remarkable intellectual achievement" of its time. He compared the book "to the work of

6603: 6593: 6165: 4694:, Universale Laterza (in Italian), vol. 129, translated by Antinucci, Francesco, Bari: Laterza 4312: 2251: 2141:

that formal languages and methods used in symbolic logic can be adapted to analyze human languages.

2134: 2033: 1529: 1258: 1200: 325: 6774: 5494:

Scientific rhetoric and disciplinary identity: A critical rhetorical history of generative grammar

2976: 6714: 6497: 6066: 5782: 5751: 5649: 5618: 5573: 5410: 5390: 5358: 5295: 5079: 4875: 4593: 4541: 4506: 4498: 4332: 4301: 3264: 3154: 1692: 1656: 1317: 1274: 1147: 890:. He then talks about the goals of syntactic study. For Chomsky, a linguist's goal is to build a 810:), was published in Moscow. In 1963, Yasuo Isamu wrote a Japanese translation of the book, named 777: 752: 679:

refused to publish it. He also saw a paper promptly rejected by the academic linguistics journal

588: 579:

There are, however, some major points of divergence from Hjelmslev's conception. Hjelmslev was a

402: 394: 329: 256: 205: 197: 6244: 4847: 2290:

writes that " revolution followed fairly closely the general pattern described in Thomas Kuhn's

390:

in 1949. He then published a revised and expanded version of it as his master's thesis in 1951.

941:

Chomsky then analyzes further about the basis of "grammaticality." He shows three ways that do

328:. Harris was an established linguist. He did research in the way laid out by American linguist 6754: 6419: 6328: 6132: 6036: 6003: 5974: 5953: 5931: 5920: 5910: 5832: 5704: 5542: 5448: 5428: 5377: 5251: 5198: 5177: 5138: 5120: 5046: 4996: 4935: 4915: 4809: 4791: 4769: 4742: 4724: 4647: 4627: 4559: 4447: 4406: 4378: 4353: 3287: 3212: 3180: 2894: 2855: 2720: 2537: 2250:

refers to Lees as "Chomsky's Huxley", referring to the proselytizing "bulldog" role played by

2006:, Zellig Harris writes that “N. Chomsky has given much-needed assistance with the manuscript." 1749: 1411: 1078: 768:

visible on the linguistic research landscape. Shortly thereafter the book created a putative "

688: 559:

which were first adopted into linguistics by Hjelmslev whose ideas are reiterated by Chomsky:

260: 84: 5718: 2332:, Chomsky writes that he was "following a familiar technical use of the term "generate," cf. 378:

From there on, Chomsky tried to build a grammar of Hebrew. Such a grammar would generate the

204:, but used in a precise and integrative way by Chomsky), morphophonemic rules (introduced by 196:

was Chomsky's first book on linguistics and reflected the contemporary developments in early

6822: 6585: 6562: 6177: 6154: 6116: 6086: 6058: 5943: 5845: 5774: 5741: 5733: 5696: 5641: 5593: 5565: 5532: 5522: 5481: 5402: 5350: 5287: 5071: 5030: 4974: 4895: 4867: 4839: 4673:(in Korean), translated by Lee, Seung-Hwan; Lee, Hei-Sook, Seoul: Pan-Korea Book Corporation 4585: 4533: 4490: 4324: 4293: 3256: 3146: 1700: 1696: 1604: 1588: 1534: 1502: 1478: 1410:. He presented the generative grammar as a coherent abstract description of this underlying 1137: 1048: 1036: 866: 854: 850: 653:

structures, including the object as a dependent of the verb phrase, are caused by a genetic

622: 599:

Instead, the idea of language endorsed by Leonard Bloomfield and his followers derived from

264: 71: 5793:

Quine, Willard Van Orman (1969), "Reply to Chomsky", in D. Davidson and J. Hintikka (ed.),

4664:(in Czech), translated by Hlavsa, Zdeněk; Benešová, Eva; Daneš, František, Prague: Academia 4281: 1951:(1952), an annotated study of a 13th century Hebrew grammar. It was written by his father, 1219:) to a highly formalized model of language, but also appeals explicitly and tacitly to the 6958: 6888: 6233:

Syntactic Structures after 60 Years: The Impact of the Chomskyan Revolution in Linguistics

5948: 5059: 3204: 3172: 2886: 1952: 1559: 1386: 1333: 1325: 1172: 1032: 846: 826: 504: 225: 209: 6097:

Tomalin, Marcus (2003), "Goodman, Quine, and Chomsky: from a grammatical point of view",

4662:

Syntaktické struktury : logický základ teorie jazyka, O pojmu "gramatické pravidlo."

6246:

Syntactic Structures Revisited: Contemporary Lectures on Classic Transformational Theory

6734: 6249:, Current Studies in Linguistics, vol. 33, Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press 6226:, Cambridge Studies in Linguistics, vol. 67, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 5553: 5537: 4396: 4388: 4363: 4256:"Face the facts : Reading Chomsky's 'Remarks on Nominalization' after forty years" 2255: 1576: 1525: 1051: 993: 920: 858: 769: 700: 696: 681: 524: 360: 309: 308:

Chomsky's interest in language started at an early age. When he was twelve, he studied

213: 6120: 6090: 4518: 1748:'s Center for Cognitive Sciences compiled a list of the 100 most influential works in 1643:

was not widely available in print for decades. Nevertheless, Sampson's argument runs,

1348:(i.e. the study of organization of sounds in languages) were relegated in importance. 839:

in Paris. In 1973, Mouton published a German translation by Klaus-Peter Lange, titled

699:

since 1954. Particularly, they had published works by linguists Nicolaas Van Wijk and

7014: 6979: 6966: 6779: 6764: 6694: 6240: 6196: 6070: 5935: 5685: 5653: 5622: 5154:(1961), "Linguistic prospects in the US", in Christine Mohrmann; et al. (eds.), 5092: 4843: 4437: 4343: 4305: 1779: 1724: 1704: 1613: 1399: 1236: 1188: 1143: 1099: 1067: 966: 896: 614:. This led to the separation of syntax from semantics as not an observable link in a 600: 580: 556: 552: 499: 368: 344: 321: 201: 5755: 5598: 5303: 5230: 4900: 4879: 4723:(in Spanish), translated by Otero, Carlos Peregrín, Mexico City, Mexico: Siglo XXI, 4545: 4510: 1912:

writes: " was at the time an unknown 28-year-old who taught language classes at MIT"

1583:. Hockett believes such an idealization is not possible. He claims that there is no 17: 6309: 6267: 5966: 5822: 5679:, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp. 17–43 5220: 4460: 4251: 1486: 1482: 1381: 1302: 1111: 712: 296: 277: 268: 162: 53: 5686:"Creation Myths of Generative Grammar and the Mathematics of Syntactic Structures" 5194:

Landmarks in Linguistic Thought II: The Western Tradition in the Twentieth Century

5034: 1864:

Here, "generate" means giving a clear structural description of each sentence. In

1501:

and containing many of its ideas, was crucial to the development of the theory of

1226:

In particular, Chomsky's analysis of the complex English auxiliary verb system in

1073:

Chomsky also borrowed the term "generative" from a previous work of mathematician

6260: 6231:

Norbert Hornstein; Howard Lasnik; Pritty Patel-Grosz; Charles Yang, eds. (2017),

6030: 5997: 5826: 5812: 5700: 5442: 5422: 5371: 5245: 5192: 4929: 4909: 4783: 4718: 4553: 4441: 4400: 5868: 5657: 5606: 5151: 4262:, Paris: Presses Universitaires de Paris Ouest, pp. 307–324, archived from 2541: 1639:(LSLT) in matters regarding the formal underpinnings of Chomsky's approach, but 1580: 1430: 1403: 1290: 1278: 1270: 1107: 785: 720: 630: 626: 337: 237: 158: 6200: 4297: 587:

concept of language as an interactive system of meaning and form. Although the

6062: 5737: 5611:

Constituent Structure: A Study of Contemporary Models of Syntactic Description

4978: 4934:, Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, John Benjamins Publishing, 4277: 1584: 1446: 1442: 1329: 1008:(TGG), "a more powerful model ... that might remedy these inadequacies." 363:'s work on philosophical systems. Chomsky was also influenced by the works of 352: 281: 252: 248: 125: 4537: 4123:"Chomsky Was Right, NYU Researchers Find: We Do Have a "Grammar" in Our Head" 1215:"multilayered and compelling". Chomsky not only makes a logical appeal (i.e. 5924: 5527: 5485: 2844:"Introduction to the second edition of Syntactic Structures by Noam Chomsky" 1688: 1671:

does not contain a valid, convincing proof dismissing finite-state devices.

1609: 1458: 1345: 1180: 1103: 1074: 900: 692: 676: 593: 527:. First, it functions as a descriptive device, or as Hjelmslev explains it: 383: 379: 178: 166: 129: 5556:(1943), "Formal Reductions of the General Combinatorial Decision Problem", 5546: 5099:, vol. 3. Theoretical Foundations, The Hague: Mouton, pp. 155–304 4911:

Ideology and Linguistic Theory: Noam Chomsky and the Deep Structure Debates

1768:, a book on intellectual history by British literary critic and biographer 473:

by adding information on neglected viewpoints, or discuss the issue on the

6158: 6049:

Thorne, James Peter (1965), "Review of P. Postal, Constituent Structure",

5677:

Logical Aspects of Computational Linguistics: 4th International Conference

5021:

Heitner, R. M. (2005), "An odd couple: Chomsky and Quine on the phoneme",

4712:(in Swedish), translated by Löfqvist, Anders; Wigforss, Eva, Lund: Gleerup 4573: 4419:

Brown, E. Keith (2010), "Generative Grammar", in Kirsten Malmkjaer (ed.),

5987:

Sklar, Robert (9 September 1968), "Chomsky's Revolution in Linguistics",

2080:

writes that "It is well known that Carnap's post-Aufbau work (especially

1277:

tradition. These early remarks proved to be prescient. American linguist

1040: 654: 229: 5872: 2583:

Versions of such non-transformational phrase structure grammars include

5858: 5786: 5645: 5577: 5362: 4949: 4871: 4502: 2246:

remarks that Lees's review was "hyperbolic", his language "loaded" and

1572: 1184: 1115: 1044: 891: 551:

These are logical consequences of the mathematical systems proposed by

6129:

Linguistics and the Formal Sciences: The Origins of Generative Grammar

5414: 5321:

Levin, Samuel R. (1965), "Langue and Parole in American Linguistics",

5299: 5174:

From Whitney to Chomsky: Essays in the History of American Linguistics

5083: 4808:, Guides for the Perplexed, London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 4597: 4336: 3268: 3158: 1273:

called the Chomskyan brand of linguistic theory a "heresy" within the

933:

A tree diagram of the sentence "Colorless green ideas sleep furiously"

929: 4260:

Foisonnements morphologiques: études en hommage à Françoise Kerleroux

1956: 1434: 1337: 1119: 996:. Then in the fourth chapter titled "Phrase Structure", he discusses 908: 887: 426:

project. The same year he submitted his doctoral dissertation to the

313: 208:) and an item-and-process style of grammar description (developed by 174: 74: 5778: 5569: 5354: 4494: 1612:-based". For him, it relies too much on native speakers' subjective 1309:

was "probably the most radical and important change in direction in

1154:

Constructional homonymity and distinct levels of linguistic analysis

6224:

Grammatical Theory in the United States: From Bloomfield to Chomsky

6181: 5406: 5393:(1986), "Has There Been a 'Chomskyan Revolution' in Linguistics?", 5291: 5075: 4788:

For Roman Jakobson: Essays on the occasion of his sixtieth birthday

4589: 4328: 4315:(1953), "A Quasi-Arithmetical Notation for Syntactic Description", 3260: 3150: 2843: 6235:, Studies in Generative Grammar , vol. 129, De Gruyter Mouton 6077:

Tomalin, Marcus (2002), "The formal origins of syntactic theory",

4786:, in M. Halle; H.G. Lunt; H. McLean; C.H. van Schooneveld (eds.), 2423:

Because it would "reveal" insights about sentence structures. See

1493:

in 1961 and was influenced by it. Chomsky's "Three models" paper (

1438: 1220: 1216: 1047:. Chomsky then applies this idea of transformational rules in the 348: 295: 5197:, History of Linguistic Thought, London and New York: Routledge, 4914:, History of Linguistic Thought, London and New York: Routledge, 1978: 1114:" which are stated in terms of "hypothetical constructs" such as 6018:"The Role of Artificial Languages in the Philosophy of Language" 4888:

DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada

4703:(in German), translated by Lange, Klaus-Peter, The Hague: Mouton 2854:(second ed.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. pp. v–xviii. 1407: 1313:

and in linguistic theory that has taken place in recent years".

259:, becoming an influential work in the formation of the field of 6282: 6278: 5215:, Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company 1579:, well-defined, stable system and proceeds from this idealized 1394:

of human language in terms of conditioned responses to outside

1285:

in the sense of Chomsky". By 1965, linguists were saying that

723:

for Jakobson. The festschrift was published by Mouton in 1956.

188:

Based on lecture notes he had prepared for his students at the

5996:

Steinberg, Danny D.; Hiroshi, Nagata; Aline, David P. (2013),

2571: 2222:. This letter accompanied the final version of the manuscript. 2163:

In particular, Chomsky wrote an academic paper in 1956 titled

1647:, albeit "sketchy", derived its "aura of respectability" from 445: 5427:, Routledge history of linguistic thought series, Routledge, 1257:

In an early review of the book, American structural linguist

695:. They had gained academic reputation by publishing works on 1687:

goes directly back to the work of the mathematical logician

1289:

had "mark an epoch", had a "startling impact" and created a

336:(1951). This is how Chomsky came to know a formal theory of 5116:

Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages, and Computation

4617:(in Japanese), translated by Isamu, Yasuo, Tokyo: Kenkyusha 2642:"All-TIME 100 Nonfiction Books : Syntactic Structures" 1324:"revolutionary" for two reasons. Firstly, it showed that a 1066:, the term "transformation" was borrowed from the works of 5191:

Joseph, John Earl; Love, Nigel; Taylor, Talbot J. (2001),

4374:

The Chomsky Effect: A Radical works beyond the Ivory Tower

640:, Chomsky changes the meaning of Hjelmslev's principle of 5719:"On the Mathematical Foundations of Syntactic Structures" 5376:, Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 4109: 1344:(i.e. the study of structure and formation of words) and 1035:

rules. The phrase structure rules are used for expanding

6168:(1958), "Review of Noam Chomsky, Syntactic Structures", 1461:. The investigation of these rules started a new era in 216:(based on symbols and rules). At its base, Chomsky uses 4481:

Chomsky, Noam (1953), "Systems of Syntactic Analysis",

792:, it would be 17 more years before it saw publication. 519:

of all different types of linguistic units, similar to

470: 4282:"Structural Linguistics and the Philosophy of Science" 2188:

The series's editor van Schooneveld is quoted thus in

1351:

American linguist Norbert Hornstein wrote that before

5447:(2 ed.), San Diego, California: Academic Press, 1881: 1541:

of an "internal grammar mechanism" inside the brain.

4682:(in French), translated by Braudeau, Michel, Paris: 2175:). It foreshadows many of the concepts presented in 1023:

Chomsky's transformational grammar has three parts:

430:. The university granted him a Ph.D. for his thesis 6990: 6950: 6869: 6793: 6685: 6519: 6370: 6361: 5508:, vol. 2, London and New York: Routledge Press 4782:Chomsky, Noam; Halle, Morris; Lukoff, Fred (1956), 3718: 3716: 3703: 3701: 3120: 3118: 2808: 2806: 2804: 2802: 2192:, pp. 5–6: "I had originally conceived of the 2133:Before Chomsky, Israeli mathematician and linguist 1473:With its formal and logical treatment of language, 243:Written when Chomsky was still an unknown scholar, 137: 116: 108: 100: 90: 80: 67: 59: 49: 6909:Distorted Morality – America's War on Terror? 4755:Chomsky, Noam (1978), "A theory of core grammar", 3367: 3247:Wells, Rulon S. (1947). "Immediate constituents". 2772: 2770: 1819: 1667:for the "rigorous proof" of this. But in reality, 1131:Application of transformational grammar in English 343:For his thesis, Chomsky set out to apply Harris's 6879:Manufacturing Consent: Noam Chomsky and the Media 6022:The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Language 6020:, in Gillian Russell and Delia Graff Fara (ed.), 5811:Riemsdijk, Henk C. van.; Huybregts, Riny (1982), 5747:20.500.11820/3bfafa09-b7f2-4249-b2d3-714227f2ddb8 2881: 2879: 2877: 2837: 2835: 2833: 347:to Hebrew. Following Harris's advice, he studied 5424:Generative Linguistics: A Historical Perspective 4671:변형생성문법의_이론 (Byeonhyeongsaengseongmunbeobui_iron) 4061: 4059: 2093: 1823: 1699:to generate probable sentences in language in a 1305:wrote in 1967 that the publication of Chomsky's 1269:" within linguistics. Another American linguist 359:. He found Harris's views on language much like 5515:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 4790:, The Hague: Mouton & Co., pp. 65–80, 4402:Mind as Machine: A History of Cognitive Science 4209: 4207: 4205: 4203: 2717:Western linguistics: An historical introduction 1839: 1039:and for substitutions. These yield a string of 811: 726:Cornelis van Schooneveld was the editor of the 561: 545: 537: 529: 263:. It also significantly influenced research on 212:). Here, Chomsky's approach to syntax is fully 6508:New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind 6032:Fifty Key Thinkers on Language and Linguistics 5863:, London and New York: Continuum International 5627:"Natural languages and context-free languages" 5113:Hopcroft, John E.; Ullman, Jeffrey D. (1979), 4954:Beiträge zur Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft 4908:Goldsmith, John A.; Huck, Geoffrey J. (1995), 4519:"Three models for the description of language" 4423:(3 ed.), London & New York: Routledge 3329: 3327: 2524: 2084:) influenced Chomsky directly to some extent." 1876: 1874: 1679:Pullum also remarks that the "originality" of 1477:also brought linguistics and the new field of 1425:initiated an interdisciplinary dialog between 1183:. He shows that in order to build a theory of 1015:The grammar model discussed in Noam Chomsky's 818: 332:. He let Chomsky proofread a copy of his book 6294: 6170:International Journal of American Linguistics 5586:Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 4574:"A Review of B. F. Skinner's Verbal Behavior" 4258:, in Florence Villoing; Sophie David (eds.), 4235: 3356: 3211:. Paris: Les éditions de minuit. p. 27. 3179:. Paris: Les éditions de minuit. p. 27. 2710: 2708: 2706: 2704: 2702: 2700: 2698: 2696: 2694: 2692: 2679: 2677: 2317: 2041: 1723:In 1982, Pullum and another British linguist 1707:in 1947, ten years before the publication of 8: 6814:Chomsky's Universal Grammar: An Introduction 6024:, Routledge Philosophy Companions, Routledge 4832:International Journal of Applied Linguistics 4224: 3847: 3845: 3777: 3766: 2574:or in the brain of each individual speaker." 2165:Three Models for the Description of Language 840: 830: 32: 6899:Power and Terror: Noam Chomsky in Our Times 5999:Psycholinguistics: Language, Mind and World 5156:Trends in European and American Linguistics 4377:, Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 4352:, Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 2540:'s address to the Asiatic Society in 1786, 1979:"Noam Chomsky interviewed by David Samuels" 1835: 1765:The 100 Most Influential Books Ever Written 1655:. In the view of British-American linguist 393:In 1951, Chomsky became a Junior Fellow at 340:. He soon decided to major in the subject. 324:, the founder of the college's linguistics 6468:The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory 6367: 6301: 6287: 6279: 6212:Generative Grammar: Theory and its History 5726:Journal of Logic, Language and Information 5613:, Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University 4950:"The coming about of Syntactic Structures" 4739:The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory 3282:Berwick, Robert C.; Chomsky, Noam (2015). 2941:"Human nature and the origins of language" 2915:"The Cognitive Science Millennium Project" 2138: 1814: 1812: 1637:The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory 1622:The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory 1209:The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory 668:The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory 434:In fact, it was just the ninth chapter of 408:The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory 122:The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory 38: 31: 6929:Peace, Propaganda & the Promised Land 6205:, Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press 6131:, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 6110: 5947: 5745: 5597: 5536: 5526: 5247:Towards a history of American linguistics 4899: 4476:(M.A. thesis), University of Pennsylvania 4467:(B.A. thesis), University of Pennsylvania 3074: 2664: 2662: 2635: 2633: 2546:Eine Ausnahme der ersten Lautverschiebung 1898: 845:. The book has also been translated into 764:. This early but influential review made 746:Soon after the book's first publication, 711:series was written by Roman Jakobson and 6624:The Prosperous Few and the Restless Many 5942:, Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 5940:The Mathematical Theory of Communication 5817:, Dordrecht, Holland: Foris Publications 4024: 3932: 3921: 3886: 3644: 3585: 3573: 3561: 3525: 3513: 3467: 3434: 3423: 3378: 3344: 2490: 2436: 2259: 2243: 2231: 2206: 2189: 1554:In his 1964 presidential address to the 1199:Randy Allen Harris, a specialist of the 1010: 928: 703:. Soon they started a new series called 177:(the study of sentence structures) from 165:, originally published in 1957. A short 5814:The Generative Enterprise: A Discussion 5806:, Walter De Gruyter, pp. 2084–2110 5167:, Walter De Gruyter, pp. 1880–1908 5133:Jakobson, Romam; Halle, Morris (1956), 5093:"Language, mathematics and linguistics" 4646:, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 4194: 4182: 4170: 4158: 4146: 4110:Pallier, Devauchelle & Dehaene 2011 4076: 4065: 3910: 3851: 3836: 3824: 3812: 3800: 3788: 3746: 3734: 3722: 3707: 3692: 3680: 3668: 3633: 3621: 3609: 3597: 3549: 3537: 3501: 3490: 3479: 3456: 3401: 3234: 3124: 3086: 3024: 2824: 2812: 2793: 2776: 2761: 2683: 2668: 2618: 2567: 2478: 2466: 2424: 2411: 2399: 2378: 2366: 2354: 2337: 2329: 2304: 2292:The Structure of Scientific Revolutions 2263: 2172: 2167:published in the technological journal 2151: 2121: 2105: 2077: 2053: 2037: 2016: 1865: 1852: 1803: 1795: 1494: 422:. He worked there as a linguist in the 5973:, Acton, MA: Copley Publishing Group, 4931:200 Years of Syntax: A Critical Survey 4526:IRE Transactions on Information Theory 4421:The Routledge Linguistics Encyclopedia 4213: 4087: 4012: 3989: 3954: 3875: 3863: 3656: 3445: 3412: 3333: 3318: 3109: 3097: 3062: 3051: 3028: 3012: 3000: 2744: 2386: 2287: 2275: 2247: 2219: 2169:IRE Transactions on Information Theory 2003: 1973: 1960: 1949:David Kimhi's Hebrew Grammar (Mikhlol) 1909: 1894: 1603:Contrary to Hockett, British linguist 691:was a Dutch publishing house based in 6337:Colorless green ideas sleep furiously 5909:, Secaucus, N.J.: Carol Publ. Group, 5873:"Chomsky's Revolution in Linguistics" 5226:Selected Papers on Computer Languages 5045:, Leiden: Leiden University Library, 4098: 4037:Norbert Hornstein (27 January 2017). 4001: 3965: 3898: 3306: 3209:Prolégomènes à une théorie du langage 3177:Prolégomènes à une théorie du langage 3040: 2789: 2787: 2785: 2719:. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 250–251. 2520: 2503: 2449: 2389:) by Zellig Harris, Chomsky's mentor. 2283: 2065: 1729:context-free phrase structure grammar 1571:, Hockett writes that Chomsky's main 948:Colorless green ideas sleep furiously 925:Colorless green ideas sleep furiously 743:in the second week of February 1957. 190:Massachusetts Institute of Technology 171:Colorless green ideas sleep furiously 7: 6538:American Power and the New Mandarins 5765:(1951), "Two Dogmas of Empiricism", 4432:(in Serbo-Croatian), Belgrade: Nolit 3977: 3943: 3762: 3758: 3390: 2625: 2589:Head-driven phrase structure grammar 2585:Generalized phrase structure grammar 2333: 2316:Specifically, the model proposed in 1727:argued that Chomsky's criticisms of 1481:closer together. Computer scientist 1429:and linguists. American philosopher 1301:." British historian of linguistics 750:, editor of the prestigious journal 388:The Morphophonemics of Modern Hebrew 6919:Noam Chomsky: Rebel Without a Pause 6644:Objectivity and Liberal Scholarship 6529:The Responsibility of Intellectuals 6390:Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 5158:, Utrecht: Spectrum, pp. 11–20 4784:"On Accent and Juncture in English" 4624:Current issues in linguistic theory 4405:, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 3284:Why Only Us: Language and Evolution 2891:Prolegomena to a Theory of Language 1882:Steinberg, Hiroshi & Aline 2013 1110:". He likens grammatical rules to " 1006:transformational generative grammar 825:. In 1969, a French translation by 583:and applied mathematical models to 509:Prolegomena to a Theory of Language 247:had a major impact on the study of 6850:The Cambridge Companion to Chomsky 6478:Lectures on Government and Binding 5506:Noam Chomsky: Critical Assessments 5373:The Cambridge Companion to Chomsky 4806:Chomsky: A Guide for the Perplexed 4446:, Wien (Vienna): Julius Springer, 1972:For its similarity to Hebrew. See 973:Grammar models and transformations 498:presented the state of the art of 397:. There, he tried to build an all- 312:under his father. He also studied 25: 5011:Methods in Structural Linguistics 2893:. University of Wisconsin Press. 2383:Methods in Structural Linguistics 1497:), published a year prior to the 1316:Another historian of linguistics 992:model which treats language as a 442:Situatedness in linguistic theory 334:Methods in Structural Linguistics 6273:50 years of Syntactic Structures 5804:History of the Language Sciences 5165:History of the Language Sciences 5119:(1st ed.), Addison-Wesley, 4844:10.1111/j.1473-4192.2007.00137.x 4474:Morphophonemics of Modern Hebrew 4465:Morphophonemics of Modern Hebrew 3368:Chomsky, Halle & Lukoff 1956 2640:Grossman, Lev (17 August 2016). 1575:is that he treats language as a 878:Goals of syntactic investigation 780:states that "the publication of 521:terminal and nonterminal symbols 494:At the time of its publication, 450: 418:In 1955, Chomsky found a job at 6832:Noam Chomsky: A Life of Dissent 6745:9-11: Was There An Alternative? 6400:Aspects of the Theory of Syntax 5599:10.1090/s0002-9904-1944-08111-1 5558:American Journal of Mathematics 5504:Otero, Carlos Peregrín (1994), 5441:Newmeyer, Frederick J. (1987), 5421:Newmeyer, Frederick J. (1996), 5339:Aspects of the Theory of Syntax 5211:Douglas A. Kibbee, ed. (2010), 4901:10.1590/S0102-44501997000300007 4643:Aspects of the Theory of Syntax 4349:Noam Chomsky: A life of Dissent 1935: 1293:"revolution". British linguist 143:Aspects of the Theory of Syntax 6674:Requiem for the American Dream 6558:Counter-Revolutionary Violence 5949:11858/00-001M-0000-002C-4314-2 5905:Seymour-Smith, Martin (1998), 5828:A Short History of Linguistics 2939:Anthropology, Radical (2008). 2555:Cours de Linguistique Générale 2094:Joseph, Love & Taylor 2001 1922: 1820:Riemsdijk & Huybregts 1982 1002:immediate constituent analysis 1: 6939:Is the Man Who Is Tall Happy? 6449:Conditions on Transformations 6121:10.1016/s0024-3841(03)00017-2 6091:10.1016/S0024-3841(02)00049-9 5852:, London: Hutchinson & Co 5097:Current Trends in Linguistics 5035:10.1016/j.langsci.2003.11.006 4858:(1967), "Truth and Meaning", 2715:Seuren, Pieter A. M. (1998). 2028:Especially Goodman's work on 1703:manner was first proposed by 1556:Linguistic Society of America 1106:of a particular language to " 675:) for publication. But MIT's 282:gathering and testing of data 7026:Cognitive science literature 6430:The Sound Pattern of English 5894:The New York Review of Books 5877:The New York Review of Books 5717:Pullum, Geoffrey K. (2011), 5701:10.1007/978-3-642-14322-9_18 5684:Pullum, Geoffrey K. (2010), 5467:: A footnote to Murray 1999" 5463:"On the publication date of 5444:Linguistic Theory in America 4985:Harris, Randy Allen (1993), 2917:. 2004-08-21. Archived from 2842:Lightfoot, David W. (2002). 1824:Dillinger & Palácio 1997 1719:Necessity of transformations 1390:. Skinner had presented the 300:Noam Chomsky, the author of 6147:Historiographia Linguistica 5693:The Mathematics of Language 5474:Historiographia Linguistica 5343:The Philosophical Quarterly 5041:Hinrichs, Jan Paul (2001), 5015:University of Chicago Press 4766:Language and Responsibility 4692:Le strutture della sintassi 4558:, The Hague/Paris: Mouton, 4443:Logische Syntax der Sprache 2082:Logische Syntax der Sprache 1947:Specifically, Chomsky read 1363:Impact on other disciplines 1167:Role of semantics in syntax 812: 808:Sintaksychyeskiye Struktury 798:was the fourth book in the 7057: 5967:Skinner, Burrhus Frederick 5857:Sampson, Geoffrey (2001), 5634:Linguistics and Philosophy 5492:Oenbring, Raymond (2009), 5244:Koerner, E. F. K. (2002), 4967:Rhetoric Society Quarterly 4298:10.1177/039219216501305107 2593:Lexical functional grammar 2525:Hopcroft & Ullman 1979 2258:'s theories on evolution. 1959:scholars at the time. See 1372:The generative grammar of 1146:sentences, yes-no and wh- 976: 918: 804:Синтакси́ческие структу́ры 610:in Bloomfield's 1933 book 432:Transformational Analysis. 428:University of Pennsylvania 318:University of Pennsylvania 6440:Remarks on Nominalization 6316: 6063:10.1017/s0022226700001055 6029:Thomas, Margaret (2012), 5738:10.1007/s10849-011-9139-8 5461:Noordegraaf, Jan (2001), 5370:McGilvray, James (2005), 5104:Hockett, Charles (1968), 5091:Hockett, Charles (1966), 4979:10.1080/02773948909390840 4483:Journal of Symbolic Logic 4039:"On Syntactic Structures" 3357:Jakobson & Halle 1956 2318:Shannon & Weaver 1949 2042:Goldsmith & Huck 1995 2032:and on the inadequacy of 1505:within computer science. 1489:) recounted that he read 1283:phrase structure grammars 1089:Justification of grammars 960: 819: 465:toward certain viewpoints 316:in his first year at the 236:over language as learned 37: 6974:Valeria Wasserman (wife) 6634:World Orders Old and New 6210:Freidin, Robert (2007), 6127:Tomalin, Marcus (2006), 6016:Stokhof, Martin (2012), 5888:Searle, John R. (2002), 5763:Quine, Willard Van Orman 5498:University of Washington 5172:Joseph, John E. (2002). 5135:Fundamentals of Language 5062:(1965), "Sound Change", 4928:Graffi, Giorgio (2001), 4538:10.1109/TIT.1956.1056813 4428:Bugarski, Ranko (1972), 4225:Pullum & Gazdar 1982 3778:Pullum & Scholz 2001 3767:Pullum & Scholz 2001 2975:Johnson, Steven (2002). 1936:the "Criticisms" section 1711:. This is downplayed in 1427:philosophers of language 1058:Borrowing of terminology 998:phrase structure grammar 979:Transformational grammar 717:Fundamentals of Language 157:is an important work in 6999:Chomsky–Foucault debate 6841:The Anti-Chomsky Reader 6458:Reflections on Language 5890:"End of the Revolution" 5528:10.1073/pnas.1018711108 5486:10.1075/hl.28.1-2.18noo 5323:Foundations of Language 5213:Chomskyan (R)evolutions 5009:Harris, Zellig (1951), 4993:Oxford University Press 4948:Hamans, Camiel (2014), 4720:Estructuras sintácticas 4708:Chomsky, Noam (1973b), 4699:Chomsky, Noam (1973a), 4669:Chomsky, Noam (1966b), 4660:Chomsky, Noam (1966a), 4371:Barsky, Robert (2011), 2461:In his introduction to 2282:in 1957". According to 2002:In the 1947 preface of 1923:the "Reception" section 1746:University of Minnesota 1463:philosophical semantics 1451:Willard Van Orman Quine 1402:. Chomsky opposed this 1311:descriptive linguistics 1098:. He compares a finite 990:communication theoretic 774:Chomskyan (R)evolutions 585:Ferdinand de Saussure's 7031:1957 non-fiction books 6614:Letters from Lexington 6498:The Minimalist Program 6051:Journal of Linguistics 5850:Schools of Linguistics 5797:, Dordrecht: D. Reidel 5391:Newmeyer, Frederick J. 4804:Collins, John (2008), 4768:, New York: Pantheon, 4764:Chomsky, Noam (1979), 4737:Chomsky, Noam (1975), 4717:Chomsky, Noam (1974), 4710:Syntaktiska Strukturer 4690:Chomsky, Noam (1970), 4680:Structures Syntaxiques 4678:Chomsky, Noam (1969), 4640:Chomsky, Noam (1965), 4622:Chomsky, Noam (1964), 4613:Chomsky, Noam (1963), 4572:Chomsky, Noam (1959), 4552:Chomsky, Noam (1957), 4517:Chomsky, Noam (1956), 4472:Chomsky, Noam (1951), 2977:"Sociobiology and you" 2030:constructional systems 1627:According to Sampson, 1550:Erroneous idealization 1124:structural linguistics 1037:grammatical categories 1029:transformational rules 1025:phrase structure rules 1020: 952:statistically probable 934: 841: 832:Structures Syntaxiques 831: 608:behavioural psychology 606:which was replaced by 604:mentalistic psychology 574: 549: 541: 533: 424:mechanical translation 305: 218:phrase structure rules 7021:Books by Noam Chomsky 6859:The Kingdom of Speech 6705:Middle East Illusions 6581:Manufacturing Consent 6488:Knowledge of Language 6410:Cartesian Linguistics 6220:Matthews, Peter Hugoe 6159:10.1075/hl.28.3.19sch 5860:Empirical Linguistics 5137:, The Hague: Mouton, 4822:Cook, Vivian (2007), 4701:Strukturen der Syntax 4626:, The Hague: Mouton, 4615:文法の構造 (Bunpō no kōzō) 4197:, pp. 5, 10, 13. 2550:Ferdinand de Saussure 2137:had already shown in 1955:, one of the leading 1834:is also discussed in 1818:Chomsky is quoted in 1533:" a hierarchy in our 1267:Copernican revolution 1253:Impact on linguistics 1014: 932: 842:Strukturen der Syntax 299: 161:by American linguist 33:Syntactic Structures 6654:Hegemony or Survival 6571:The Fateful Triangle 6548:For Reasons of State 6380:Syntactic Structures 6262:Syntactic Structures 5795:Words and Objections 5767:Philosophical Review 5465:Syntactic Structures 5271:Syntactic Structures 5106:The State of the Art 4988:The Linguistics Wars 4826:Syntactic Structures 4741:, New York: Plenum, 4555:Syntactic Structures 4313:Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua 4112:, pp. 2522–2527 2948:Radical Anthropology 2852:Syntactic Structures 2536:The other three are 2508:Syntactic Structures 2502:From the preface of 2463:Syntactic Structures 2280:Syntactic Structures 2177:Syntactic Structures 1840:van Schooneveld 2001 1832:Syntactic structures 1828:Syntactic Structures 1786:Notes and references 1776:Syntactic Structures 1770:Martin Seymour-Smith 1760:Syntactic Structures 1754:Syntactic Structures 1733:Syntactic Structures 1713:Syntactic Structures 1709:Syntactic Structures 1685:Syntactic Structures 1681:Syntactic Structures 1661:Syntactic Structures 1653:Syntactic Structures 1645:Syntactic Structures 1633:Syntactic Structures 1629:Syntactic Structures 1593:genetic transmission 1569:The State of the Art 1564:Syntactic Structures 1558:, American linguist 1539:Syntactic Structures 1519:Syntactic Structures 1515:Syntactic Structures 1499:Syntactic Structures 1491:Syntactic Structures 1475:Syntactic Structures 1423:Syntactic Structures 1374:Syntactic Structures 1357:Syntactic Structures 1353:Syntactic Structures 1322:Syntactic Structures 1307:Syntactic Structures 1299:Syntactic Structures 1287:Syntactic Structures 1263:Syntactic Structures 1228:Syntactic Structures 1213:Syntactic Structures 1205:Syntactic Structures 1081:to describe sets of 1064:Syntactic Structures 1017:Syntactic Structures 986:finite state grammar 884:Syntactic Structures 796:Syntactic Structures 782:Syntactic structures 766:Syntactic Structures 758:Robert Benjamin Lees 741:Syntactic Structures 737:Syntactic Structures 650:Syntactic Structures 638:Syntactic Structures 570:Syntactic Structures 496:Syntactic Structures 302:Syntactic Structures 286:Syntactic Structures 273:Syntactic Structures 271:. The importance of 245:Syntactic Structures 194:Syntactic Structures 154:Syntactic Structures 27:Book by Noam Chomsky 18:Syntactic structures 7041:Philosophy of logic 6604:Deterring Democracy 6594:Necessary Illusions 6352:Political positions 6166:Voegelin, Charles F 5831:, London: Longman, 5619:Pullum, Geoffrey K. 5337:(1966), "Review of 5108:, The Hague: Mouton 4606:Novoe v lingvistike 4127:New York University 4043:Faculty of Language 2950:(2). Archived from 2848:Lightfoot, David W. 2252:Thomas Henry Huxley 2135:Yehoshua Bar-Hillel 1772:published in 1998. 1530:New York University 1376:heralded Chomsky's 1336:. Secondly, it put 1259:Charles F. Voegelin 1201:rhetoric of science 1000:, a model based on 909:sentence structures 835:, was published by 471:improve the article 44:First edition cover 34: 6715:Imperial Ambitions 5932:Shannon, Claude E. 5646:10.1007/bf00360802 5341:by Noam Chomsky", 5176:. John Benjamins. 4872:10.1007/bf00485035 4236:Seymour-Smith 1998 2150:Chomsky writes in 2015:In his preface to 1657:Geoffrey K. Pullum 1585:empirical evidence 1318:Frederick Newmeyer 1021: 961:Carnap's influence 935: 778:Frederick Newmeyer 623:grammatical object 395:Harvard University 330:Leonard Bloomfield 320:. In 1947, he met 306: 206:Leonard Bloomfield 198:generative grammar 192:in the mid-1950s, 7008: 7007: 6789: 6788: 6755:Making the Future 6420:Language and Mind 6329:Chomsky hierarchy 6105:(12): 1223–1253, 5980:978-1-58390-021-5 5959:978-0-252-72548-7 5916:978-0-8065-2000-1 5846:Sampson, Geoffrey 5710:978-3-642-14321-2 5434:978-0-415-11553-7 5144:978-1-178-71814-0 5126:978-81-7808-347-6 5052:978-90-74204-10-1 5023:Language Sciences 4921:978-0-415-15313-3 4890:(in Portuguese), 4815:978-0-8264-8663-9 4775:978-0-85527-535-8 4748:978-0-306-30760-7 4730:978-968-23-0075-2 4684:Éditions du Seuil 4653:978-0-262-52740-8 4633:978-90-279-0700-4 4565:978-3-11-021832-9 4453:978-3-662-23330-6 4412:978-0-19-924144-6 4384:978-0-262-51316-6 4359:978-0-262-52255-7 3980:, pp. 111–12 3237:, pp. 19, 24 3027:, p. 33 and 2538:Sir William Jones 1976:, p. 47 and 1750:cognitive science 1697:axiomatic systems 1635:to Chomsky's own 1535:neural processing 1096:physical sciences 1079:logical inference 837:Éditions du Seuil 616:stimulus–response 505:Louis Hjelmslev's 492: 491: 261:cognitive science 150: 149: 16:(Redirected from 7048: 7001: 6983: 6975: 6970: 6962: 6943: 6933: 6923: 6913: 6903: 6893: 6883: 6862: 6853: 6844: 6835: 6826: 6823:Decoding Chomsky 6817: 6808: 6782: 6769: 6759: 6749: 6739: 6729: 6719: 6709: 6699: 6678: 6668: 6658: 6648: 6638: 6628: 6618: 6608: 6598: 6588: 6586:Edward S. Herman 6575: 6565: 6563:Edward S. Herman 6552: 6542: 6532: 6512: 6502: 6492: 6482: 6472: 6462: 6452: 6443: 6434: 6424: 6414: 6404: 6394: 6384: 6368: 6354: 6347: 6345:Honorary degrees 6340: 6331: 6324: 6303: 6296: 6289: 6280: 6250: 6236: 6227: 6215: 6206: 6184: 6161: 6141: 6123: 6114: 6093: 6073: 6045: 6025: 6012: 5992: 5983: 5962: 5951: 5927: 5901: 5884: 5864: 5853: 5841: 5818: 5807: 5798: 5789: 5758: 5749: 5723: 5713: 5690: 5680: 5670: 5669: 5668: 5662: 5656:, archived from 5631: 5614: 5602: 5601: 5580: 5549: 5540: 5530: 5521:(6): 2522–2527, 5509: 5500: 5496:(Ph.D. thesis), 5488: 5480:(1–2): 225–228, 5471: 5457: 5437: 5417: 5386: 5366: 5330: 5317: 5315: 5314: 5308: 5302:, archived from 5277: 5260: 5240: 5239: 5238: 5216: 5207: 5187: 5168: 5159: 5147: 5129: 5109: 5100: 5087: 5060:Hockett, Charles 5055: 5037: 5017: 5005: 4981: 4961: 4944: 4924: 4904: 4903: 4882: 4856:Davidson, Donald 4851: 4846:, archived from 4818: 4800: 4778: 4760: 4751: 4733: 4713: 4704: 4695: 4686: 4674: 4665: 4656: 4636: 4618: 4609: 4600: 4568: 4548: 4523: 4513: 4477: 4468: 4456: 4433: 4424: 4415: 4392: 4387:, archived from 4367: 4362:, archived from 4339: 4308: 4273: 4272: 4271: 4238: 4233: 4227: 4222: 4216: 4211: 4198: 4192: 4186: 4180: 4174: 4173:, pp. 67–71 4168: 4162: 4156: 4150: 4144: 4138: 4137: 4135: 4133: 4119: 4113: 4107: 4101: 4096: 4090: 4085: 4079: 4074: 4068: 4063: 4054: 4053: 4051: 4049: 4034: 4028: 4027:, pp. 24–26 4022: 4016: 4010: 4004: 3999: 3993: 3987: 3981: 3975: 3969: 3963: 3957: 3952: 3946: 3941: 3935: 3930: 3924: 3919: 3913: 3908: 3902: 3896: 3890: 3884: 3878: 3873: 3867: 3861: 3855: 3854:, pp. 96–97 3849: 3840: 3834: 3828: 3822: 3816: 3810: 3804: 3803:, pp. 85–87 3798: 3792: 3791:, pp. 49–56 3786: 3780: 3775: 3769: 3756: 3750: 3749:, pp. 66–67 3744: 3738: 3737:, pp. 38–40 3732: 3726: 3720: 3711: 3705: 3696: 3695:, pp. 26–33 3690: 3684: 3683:, pp. 19–21 3678: 3672: 3666: 3660: 3654: 3648: 3642: 3636: 3631: 3625: 3619: 3613: 3607: 3601: 3595: 3589: 3583: 3577: 3571: 3565: 3559: 3553: 3547: 3541: 3535: 3529: 3523: 3517: 3511: 3505: 3499: 3493: 3488: 3482: 3477: 3471: 3465: 3459: 3454: 3448: 3443: 3437: 3432: 3426: 3421: 3415: 3410: 3404: 3399: 3393: 3388: 3382: 3376: 3370: 3365: 3359: 3354: 3348: 3342: 3336: 3331: 3322: 3321:, pp. 81–82 3316: 3310: 3304: 3298: 3297: 3279: 3273: 3272: 3244: 3238: 3232: 3226: 3225: 3205:Hjelmslev, Louis 3201: 3195: 3194: 3173:Hjelmslev, Louis 3169: 3163: 3162: 3134: 3128: 3122: 3113: 3107: 3101: 3095: 3089: 3084: 3078: 3072: 3066: 3060: 3054: 3049: 3043: 3038: 3032: 3022: 3016: 3015:, pp. 49–50 3010: 3004: 2998: 2992: 2991: 2989: 2988: 2972: 2966: 2965: 2963: 2962: 2956: 2945: 2936: 2930: 2929: 2927: 2926: 2911: 2905: 2904: 2887:Hjelmslev, Louis 2883: 2872: 2871: 2869: 2868: 2839: 2828: 2822: 2816: 2810: 2797: 2791: 2780: 2774: 2765: 2759: 2748: 2742: 2731: 2730: 2712: 2687: 2681: 2672: 2666: 2657: 2656: 2654: 2652: 2637: 2628: 2623: 2608: 2602: 2596: 2581: 2575: 2565: 2559: 2534: 2528: 2518: 2512: 2500: 2494: 2488: 2482: 2476: 2470: 2459: 2453: 2446: 2440: 2434: 2428: 2421: 2415: 2409: 2403: 2396: 2390: 2376: 2370: 2364: 2358: 2351: 2345: 2326: 2320: 2314: 2308: 2301: 2295: 2273: 2267: 2241: 2235: 2229: 2223: 2216: 2210: 2203: 2197: 2186: 2180: 2161: 2155: 2148: 2142: 2131: 2125: 2119: 2113: 2103: 2097: 2091: 2085: 2075: 2069: 2063: 2057: 2051: 2045: 2036:approaches. See 2026: 2020: 2013: 2007: 2000: 1994: 1993: 1991: 1989: 1970: 1964: 1945: 1939: 1938:of this article. 1932: 1926: 1925:of this article. 1919: 1913: 1907: 1901: 1891: 1885: 1878: 1869: 1862: 1856: 1849: 1843: 1836:Noordegraaf 2001 1816: 1807: 1800: 1762:was included in 1605:Geoffrey Sampson 1589:language faculty 1503:formal languages 1479:computer science 1469:Computer science 1412:psycholinguistic 1195:Rhetorical style 844: 834: 824: 822: 821: 815: 756:, gave linguist 715:. It was called 689:Mouton & Co. 677:Technology Press 572: 487: 484: 478: 454: 453: 446: 284:. Nevertheless, 257:mental processes 138:Followed by 117:Preceded by 92:Publication date 85:Mouton & Co. 72:Natural language 42: 35: 21: 7056: 7055: 7051: 7050: 7049: 7047: 7046: 7045: 7011: 7010: 7009: 7004: 6997: 6986: 6978: 6973: 6969:(deceased wife) 6965: 6959:William Chomsky 6957: 6946: 6936: 6926: 6916: 6906: 6896: 6889:Last Party 2000 6886: 6876: 6865: 6856: 6847: 6838: 6829: 6820: 6811: 6802: 6795: 6785: 6772: 6762: 6752: 6742: 6732: 6722: 6712: 6702: 6692: 6681: 6671: 6661: 6651: 6641: 6631: 6621: 6611: 6601: 6591: 6578: 6568: 6555: 6545: 6535: 6526: 6515: 6505: 6495: 6485: 6475: 6465: 6455: 6446: 6437: 6427: 6417: 6407: 6397: 6387: 6377: 6363: 6357: 6350: 6343: 6334: 6327: 6320: 6312: 6307: 6257: 6239: 6230: 6218: 6209: 6195: 6192: 6190:Further reading 6187: 6164: 6144: 6139: 6126: 6112:10.1.1.136.6985 6096: 6085:(10): 827–848, 6076: 6048: 6043: 6028: 6015: 6010: 5995: 5986: 5981: 5971:Verbal Behavior 5965: 5960: 5930: 5917: 5904: 5887: 5869:Searle, John R. 5867: 5856: 5844: 5839: 5821: 5810: 5801: 5792: 5779:10.2307/2181906 5761: 5721: 5716: 5711: 5688: 5683: 5673: 5666: 5664: 5660: 5629: 5617: 5607:Postal, Paul M. 5605: 5583: 5570:10.2307/2371809 5554:Post, Emil Leon 5552: 5512: 5503: 5491: 5469: 5460: 5455: 5440: 5435: 5420: 5389: 5384: 5369: 5355:10.2307/2218520 5349:(65): 393–395, 5333: 5320: 5312: 5310: 5306: 5275: 5263: 5258: 5243: 5236: 5234: 5219: 5210: 5205: 5190: 5184: 5171: 5162: 5150: 5145: 5132: 5127: 5112: 5103: 5090: 5058: 5053: 5040: 5020: 5008: 5003: 4984: 4964: 4947: 4942: 4927: 4922: 4907: 4885: 4854: 4828:fifty years on" 4821: 4816: 4803: 4798: 4781: 4776: 4763: 4754: 4749: 4736: 4731: 4716: 4707: 4698: 4689: 4677: 4668: 4659: 4654: 4639: 4634: 4621: 4612: 4603: 4571: 4566: 4551: 4521: 4516: 4495:10.2307/2267409 4480: 4471: 4459: 4454: 4436: 4427: 4418: 4413: 4397:Boden, Margaret 4395: 4385: 4370: 4360: 4342: 4311: 4292:(51): 111–128, 4276: 4269: 4267: 4250: 4246: 4241: 4234: 4230: 4223: 4219: 4212: 4201: 4193: 4189: 4181: 4177: 4169: 4165: 4157: 4153: 4145: 4141: 4131: 4129: 4121: 4120: 4116: 4108: 4104: 4097: 4093: 4086: 4082: 4075: 4071: 4064: 4057: 4047: 4045: 4036: 4035: 4031: 4023: 4019: 4011: 4007: 4000: 3996: 3988: 3984: 3976: 3972: 3964: 3960: 3953: 3949: 3942: 3938: 3931: 3927: 3920: 3916: 3909: 3905: 3897: 3893: 3885: 3881: 3874: 3870: 3862: 3858: 3850: 3843: 3835: 3831: 3823: 3819: 3811: 3807: 3799: 3795: 3787: 3783: 3776: 3772: 3757: 3753: 3745: 3741: 3733: 3729: 3721: 3714: 3706: 3699: 3691: 3687: 3679: 3675: 3667: 3663: 3655: 3651: 3643: 3639: 3632: 3628: 3620: 3616: 3608: 3604: 3596: 3592: 3584: 3580: 3572: 3568: 3560: 3556: 3548: 3544: 3536: 3532: 3524: 3520: 3512: 3508: 3500: 3496: 3489: 3485: 3478: 3474: 3466: 3462: 3455: 3451: 3444: 3440: 3433: 3429: 3422: 3418: 3411: 3407: 3400: 3396: 3389: 3385: 3377: 3373: 3366: 3362: 3355: 3351: 3343: 3339: 3332: 3325: 3317: 3313: 3305: 3301: 3294: 3281: 3280: 3276: 3246: 3245: 3241: 3233: 3229: 3219: 3203: 3202: 3198: 3187: 3171: 3170: 3166: 3136: 3135: 3131: 3123: 3116: 3108: 3104: 3096: 3092: 3085: 3081: 3073: 3069: 3061: 3057: 3050: 3046: 3039: 3035: 3023: 3019: 3011: 3007: 2999: 2995: 2986: 2984: 2974: 2973: 2969: 2960: 2958: 2954: 2943: 2938: 2937: 2933: 2924: 2922: 2913: 2912: 2908: 2901: 2885: 2884: 2875: 2866: 2864: 2862: 2841: 2840: 2831: 2823: 2819: 2811: 2800: 2792: 2783: 2775: 2768: 2760: 2751: 2743: 2734: 2727: 2714: 2713: 2690: 2682: 2675: 2667: 2660: 2650: 2648: 2639: 2638: 2631: 2624: 2620: 2616: 2611: 2603: 2599: 2582: 2578: 2566: 2562: 2535: 2531: 2519: 2515: 2501: 2497: 2489: 2485: 2477: 2473: 2460: 2456: 2447: 2443: 2435: 2431: 2422: 2418: 2410: 2406: 2397: 2393: 2377: 2373: 2365: 2361: 2352: 2348: 2327: 2323: 2315: 2311: 2302: 2298: 2274: 2270: 2242: 2238: 2230: 2226: 2217: 2213: 2204: 2200: 2187: 2183: 2162: 2158: 2149: 2145: 2139:Bar-Hillel 1953 2132: 2128: 2120: 2116: 2104: 2100: 2092: 2088: 2076: 2072: 2064: 2060: 2052: 2048: 2027: 2023: 2014: 2010: 2001: 1997: 1987: 1985: 1977: 1971: 1967: 1953:William Chomsky 1946: 1942: 1933: 1929: 1920: 1916: 1908: 1904: 1892: 1888: 1879: 1872: 1863: 1859: 1850: 1846: 1817: 1810: 1801: 1797: 1793: 1788: 1742: 1691:on formalizing 1560:Charles Hockett 1547: 1526:neuroscientists 1485:(winner of the 1449:". Chomsky and 1387:Verbal Behavior 1365: 1334:English grammar 1255: 1250: 1197: 1169: 1156: 1133: 1091: 1060: 981: 975: 963: 927: 917: 880: 875: 827:Michel Braudeau 816: 800:Janua Linguarum 728:Janua Linguarum 709:Janua Linguarum 705:Janua Linguarum 663: 646:David Lightfoot 601:William Wundt's 573: 567: 525:formal grammars 500:Zellig Harris's 488: 482: 479: 468: 455: 451: 444: 384:recursive rules 294: 226:Louis Hjelmslev 222:transformations 210:Charles Hockett 101:Media type 93: 45: 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 7054: 7052: 7044: 7043: 7038: 7033: 7028: 7023: 7013: 7012: 7006: 7005: 7003: 7002: 6994: 6992: 6988: 6987: 6985: 6984: 6976: 6971: 6963: 6954: 6952: 6948: 6947: 6945: 6944: 6934: 6924: 6914: 6904: 6894: 6884: 6873: 6871: 6867: 6866: 6864: 6863: 6854: 6845: 6836: 6827: 6818: 6809: 6799: 6797: 6791: 6790: 6787: 6786: 6784: 6783: 6770: 6760: 6750: 6740: 6735:Gaza in Crisis 6730: 6720: 6710: 6700: 6689: 6687: 6683: 6682: 6680: 6679: 6669: 6659: 6649: 6639: 6629: 6619: 6609: 6599: 6589: 6576: 6566: 6553: 6543: 6533: 6523: 6521: 6517: 6516: 6514: 6513: 6503: 6493: 6483: 6473: 6463: 6453: 6444: 6435: 6425: 6415: 6405: 6395: 6385: 6374: 6372: 6365: 6359: 6358: 6356: 6355: 6348: 6341: 6332: 6325: 6317: 6314: 6313: 6308: 6306: 6305: 6298: 6291: 6283: 6277: 6276: 6270: 6256: 6255:External links 6253: 6252: 6251: 6241:Lasnik, Howard 6237: 6228: 6216: 6207: 6197:Barsky, Robert 6191: 6188: 6186: 6185: 6182:10.1086/464460 6176:(3): 229–231, 6162: 6142: 6137: 6124: 6094: 6074: 6046: 6041: 6026: 6013: 6008: 5993: 5984: 5979: 5963: 5958: 5936:Weaver, Warren 5928: 5915: 5902: 5885: 5865: 5854: 5842: 5837: 5819: 5808: 5799: 5790: 5759: 5732:(3): 277–296, 5714: 5709: 5681: 5671: 5640:(4): 471–504, 5623:Gazdar, Gerald 5615: 5603: 5592:(5): 284–316, 5581: 5564:(2): 197–215, 5550: 5510: 5501: 5489: 5458: 5454:978-0125171519 5453: 5438: 5433: 5418: 5407:10.2307/415597 5387: 5382: 5367: 5331: 5318: 5292:10.2307/411160 5286:(3): 375–408, 5261: 5256: 5241: 5217: 5208: 5203: 5188: 5182: 5169: 5160: 5148: 5143: 5130: 5125: 5110: 5101: 5088: 5076:10.2307/411873 5070:(2): 185–204, 5056: 5051: 5038: 5018: 5006: 5001: 4982: 4973:(2): 105–130, 4962: 4945: 4941:978-1588110527 4940: 4925: 4920: 4905: 4883: 4852: 4838:(1): 120–131, 4819: 4814: 4801: 4796: 4779: 4774: 4761: 4752: 4747: 4734: 4729: 4714: 4705: 4696: 4687: 4675: 4666: 4657: 4652: 4637: 4632: 4619: 4610: 4601: 4590:10.2307/411334 4569: 4564: 4549: 4532:(3): 113–124, 4514: 4489:(3): 242–256, 4478: 4469: 4457: 4452: 4438:Carnap, Rudolf 4434: 4430:Gramatica i um 4425: 4416: 4411: 4393: 4383: 4368: 4358: 4344:Barsky, Robert 4340: 4329:10.2307/410452 4309: 4274: 4247: 4245: 4242: 4240: 4239: 4228: 4217: 4199: 4187: 4185:, p. 134. 4175: 4163: 4151: 4139: 4114: 4102: 4091: 4080: 4069: 4055: 4029: 4017: 4005: 3994: 3982: 3970: 3958: 3947: 3936: 3925: 3914: 3903: 3891: 3879: 3868: 3856: 3841: 3829: 3817: 3805: 3793: 3781: 3770: 3751: 3739: 3727: 3712: 3697: 3685: 3673: 3661: 3649: 3647:, p. 2014 3637: 3626: 3614: 3612:, pp. 5–6 3602: 3590: 3578: 3566: 3554: 3542: 3530: 3518: 3506: 3494: 3483: 3472: 3460: 3449: 3438: 3427: 3416: 3405: 3394: 3383: 3371: 3360: 3349: 3337: 3323: 3311: 3299: 3292: 3274: 3261:10.2307/410382 3239: 3227: 3217: 3196: 3185: 3164: 3151:10.2307/410221 3129: 3114: 3102: 3090: 3079: 3075:McGilvray 2005 3067: 3055: 3044: 3033: 3017: 3005: 2993: 2967: 2931: 2906: 2899: 2873: 2860: 2829: 2817: 2798: 2781: 2766: 2749: 2732: 2725: 2688: 2673: 2658: 2629: 2617: 2615: 2612: 2610: 2609: 2597: 2576: 2560: 2529: 2513: 2495: 2483: 2471: 2454: 2441: 2429: 2416: 2404: 2391: 2371: 2359: 2346: 2321: 2309: 2296: 2268: 2256:Charles Darwin 2254:in defense of 2236: 2224: 2211: 2198: 2181: 2156: 2143: 2126: 2114: 2098: 2086: 2070: 2058: 2046: 2040:, p. 33. 2021: 2008: 1995: 1965: 1940: 1927: 1914: 1902: 1899:Hjelmslev 1969 1886: 1870: 1857: 1844: 1808: 1794: 1792: 1789: 1787: 1784: 1741: 1738: 1721: 1720: 1677: 1676: 1625: 1624: 1601: 1600: 1599:Non-empiricism 1552: 1551: 1546: 1543: 1511: 1510: 1471: 1470: 1420: 1419: 1370: 1369: 1364: 1361: 1254: 1251: 1249: 1246: 1203:, writes that 1196: 1193: 1168: 1165: 1155: 1152: 1132: 1129: 1090: 1087: 1059: 1056: 1052:auxiliary verb 1033:morphophonemic 994:Markov process 974: 971: 962: 959: 921:Grammaticality 916: 915:Grammaticality 913: 879: 876: 874: 871: 863:Serbo-Croatian 786:John R. Searle 701:Roman Jakobson 697:Slavic Studies 662: 659: 568:Noam Chomsky, 565: 490: 489: 458: 456: 449: 443: 440: 365:W. V. O. Quine 361:Nelson Goodman 310:Hebrew grammar 293: 290: 181:(the study of 148: 147: 139: 135: 134: 132:version) 118: 114: 113: 110: 106: 105: 102: 98: 97: 94: 91: 88: 87: 82: 78: 77: 69: 65: 64: 61: 57: 56: 51: 47: 46: 43: 26: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 7053: 7042: 7039: 7037: 7034: 7032: 7029: 7027: 7024: 7022: 7019: 7018: 7016: 7000: 6996: 6995: 6993: 6989: 6981: 6980:Aviva Chomsky 6977: 6972: 6968: 6967:Carol Chomsky 6964: 6960: 6956: 6955: 6953: 6949: 6941: 6940: 6935: 6931: 6930: 6925: 6921: 6920: 6915: 6911: 6910: 6905: 6901: 6900: 6895: 6891: 6890: 6885: 6881: 6880: 6875: 6874: 6872: 6868: 6861: 6860: 6855: 6852: 6851: 6846: 6843: 6842: 6837: 6834: 6833: 6828: 6825: 6824: 6819: 6816: 6815: 6810: 6807: 6806: 6801: 6800: 6798: 6792: 6781: 6778:(2015), with 6777: 6776: 6771: 6767: 6766: 6761: 6757: 6756: 6751: 6747: 6746: 6741: 6737: 6736: 6731: 6727: 6726: 6725:Interventions 6721: 6717: 6716: 6711: 6707: 6706: 6701: 6697: 6696: 6695:Class Warfare 6691: 6690: 6688: 6684: 6676: 6675: 6670: 6666: 6665: 6664:Failed States 6660: 6656: 6655: 6650: 6646: 6645: 6640: 6636: 6635: 6630: 6626: 6625: 6620: 6616: 6615: 6610: 6606: 6605: 6600: 6596: 6595: 6590: 6587: 6584:(1988), with 6583: 6582: 6577: 6573: 6572: 6567: 6564: 6561:(1973), with 6560: 6559: 6554: 6550: 6549: 6544: 6540: 6539: 6534: 6530: 6525: 6524: 6522: 6518: 6510: 6509: 6504: 6500: 6499: 6494: 6490: 6489: 6484: 6480: 6479: 6474: 6470: 6469: 6464: 6460: 6459: 6454: 6450: 6445: 6441: 6436: 6432: 6431: 6426: 6422: 6421: 6416: 6412: 6411: 6406: 6402: 6401: 6396: 6392: 6391: 6386: 6382: 6381: 6376: 6375: 6373: 6369: 6366: 6360: 6353: 6349: 6346: 6342: 6338: 6333: 6330: 6326: 6323: 6319: 6318: 6315: 6311: 6304: 6299: 6297: 6292: 6290: 6285: 6284: 6281: 6274: 6271: 6269: 6265: 6263: 6259: 6258: 6254: 6248: 6247: 6242: 6238: 6234: 6229: 6225: 6221: 6217: 6213: 6208: 6204: 6203: 6202:Zellig Harris 6198: 6194: 6193: 6189: 6183: 6179: 6175: 6171: 6167: 6163: 6160: 6156: 6152: 6148: 6143: 6140: 6138:9780511486340 6134: 6130: 6125: 6122: 6118: 6113: 6108: 6104: 6100: 6095: 6092: 6088: 6084: 6080: 6075: 6072: 6068: 6064: 6060: 6056: 6052: 6047: 6044: 6042:9781136707506 6038: 6035:, Routledge, 6034: 6033: 6027: 6023: 6019: 6014: 6011: 6009:9781317900566 6005: 6002:, Routledge, 6001: 6000: 5994: 5990: 5985: 5982: 5976: 5972: 5968: 5964: 5961: 5955: 5950: 5945: 5941: 5937: 5933: 5929: 5926: 5922: 5918: 5912: 5908: 5903: 5899: 5895: 5891: 5886: 5882: 5878: 5874: 5870: 5866: 5862: 5861: 5855: 5851: 5847: 5843: 5840: 5838:9781317891116 5834: 5830: 5829: 5824: 5823:Robins, R. H. 5820: 5816: 5815: 5809: 5805: 5800: 5796: 5791: 5788: 5784: 5780: 5776: 5772: 5768: 5764: 5760: 5757: 5753: 5748: 5743: 5739: 5735: 5731: 5727: 5720: 5715: 5712: 5706: 5702: 5698: 5694: 5687: 5682: 5678: 5672: 5663:on 2019-11-01 5659: 5655: 5651: 5647: 5643: 5639: 5635: 5628: 5624: 5620: 5616: 5612: 5608: 5604: 5600: 5595: 5591: 5587: 5582: 5579: 5575: 5571: 5567: 5563: 5559: 5555: 5551: 5548: 5544: 5539: 5534: 5529: 5524: 5520: 5516: 5511: 5507: 5502: 5499: 5495: 5490: 5487: 5483: 5479: 5475: 5468: 5466: 5459: 5456: 5450: 5446: 5445: 5439: 5436: 5430: 5426: 5425: 5419: 5416: 5412: 5408: 5404: 5400: 5396: 5392: 5388: 5385: 5383:9780521784313 5379: 5375: 5374: 5368: 5364: 5360: 5356: 5352: 5348: 5344: 5340: 5336: 5332: 5328: 5324: 5319: 5309:on 2013-11-26 5305: 5301: 5297: 5293: 5289: 5285: 5281: 5274: 5272: 5266: 5262: 5259: 5257:9781134495085 5253: 5249: 5248: 5242: 5233:on 2018-08-20 5232: 5228: 5227: 5222: 5221:Knuth, Donald 5218: 5214: 5209: 5206: 5204:9780415063968 5200: 5196: 5195: 5189: 5185: 5183:9789027275370 5179: 5175: 5170: 5166: 5161: 5157: 5153: 5149: 5146: 5140: 5136: 5131: 5128: 5122: 5118: 5117: 5111: 5107: 5102: 5098: 5094: 5089: 5085: 5081: 5077: 5073: 5069: 5065: 5061: 5057: 5054: 5048: 5044: 5039: 5036: 5032: 5028: 5024: 5019: 5016: 5012: 5007: 5004: 5002:9780195098341 4998: 4994: 4990: 4989: 4983: 4980: 4976: 4972: 4968: 4963: 4959: 4955: 4951: 4946: 4943: 4937: 4933: 4932: 4926: 4923: 4917: 4913: 4912: 4906: 4902: 4897: 4893: 4889: 4884: 4881: 4877: 4873: 4869: 4865: 4861: 4857: 4853: 4850:on 2013-01-05 4849: 4845: 4841: 4837: 4833: 4829: 4827: 4820: 4817: 4811: 4807: 4802: 4799: 4797:9780598664198 4793: 4789: 4785: 4780: 4777: 4771: 4767: 4762: 4758: 4753: 4750: 4744: 4740: 4735: 4732: 4726: 4722: 4721: 4715: 4711: 4706: 4702: 4697: 4693: 4688: 4685: 4681: 4676: 4672: 4667: 4663: 4658: 4655: 4649: 4645: 4644: 4638: 4635: 4629: 4625: 4620: 4616: 4611: 4607: 4602: 4599: 4595: 4591: 4587: 4583: 4579: 4575: 4570: 4567: 4561: 4557: 4556: 4550: 4547: 4543: 4539: 4535: 4531: 4527: 4520: 4515: 4512: 4508: 4504: 4500: 4496: 4492: 4488: 4484: 4479: 4475: 4470: 4466: 4462: 4461:Chomsky, Noam 4458: 4455: 4449: 4445: 4444: 4439: 4435: 4431: 4426: 4422: 4417: 4414: 4408: 4404: 4403: 4398: 4394: 4391:on 2006-09-06 4390: 4386: 4380: 4376: 4375: 4369: 4366:on 2006-09-06 4365: 4361: 4355: 4351: 4350: 4345: 4341: 4338: 4334: 4330: 4326: 4322: 4318: 4314: 4310: 4307: 4303: 4299: 4295: 4291: 4287: 4283: 4279: 4275: 4266:on 2016-06-09 4265: 4261: 4257: 4253: 4252:Aronoff, Mark 4249: 4248: 4243: 4237: 4232: 4229: 4226: 4221: 4218: 4215: 4210: 4208: 4206: 4204: 4200: 4196: 4191: 4188: 4184: 4179: 4176: 4172: 4167: 4164: 4161:, p. 156 4160: 4155: 4152: 4149:, p. 185 4148: 4143: 4140: 4128: 4124: 4118: 4115: 4111: 4106: 4103: 4100: 4095: 4092: 4089: 4084: 4081: 4078: 4073: 4070: 4067: 4062: 4060: 4056: 4044: 4040: 4033: 4030: 4026: 4025:Newmeyer 1996 4021: 4018: 4015:, p. 226 4014: 4009: 4006: 4003: 3998: 3995: 3991: 3986: 3983: 3979: 3974: 3971: 3967: 3962: 3959: 3956: 3951: 3948: 3945: 3940: 3937: 3934: 3933:Voegelin 1958 3929: 3926: 3923: 3922:Oenbring 2009 3918: 3915: 3912: 3907: 3904: 3901:, p. 186 3900: 3895: 3892: 3888: 3887:Newmeyer 1987 3883: 3880: 3877: 3872: 3869: 3865: 3860: 3857: 3853: 3848: 3846: 3842: 3839:, p. 101 3838: 3833: 3830: 3826: 3821: 3818: 3814: 3809: 3806: 3802: 3797: 3794: 3790: 3785: 3782: 3779: 3774: 3771: 3768: 3764: 3760: 3755: 3752: 3748: 3743: 3740: 3736: 3731: 3728: 3724: 3719: 3717: 3713: 3709: 3704: 3702: 3698: 3694: 3689: 3686: 3682: 3677: 3674: 3670: 3665: 3662: 3658: 3653: 3650: 3646: 3645:Rebuschi 2001 3641: 3638: 3635: 3630: 3627: 3623: 3618: 3615: 3611: 3606: 3603: 3599: 3594: 3591: 3587: 3586:Chomsky 1973b 3582: 3579: 3575: 3574:Bugarski 1972 3570: 3567: 3563: 3562:Chomsky 1966a 3558: 3555: 3551: 3546: 3543: 3539: 3534: 3531: 3527: 3526:Chomsky 1966b 3522: 3519: 3515: 3514:Chomsky 1973a 3510: 3507: 3503: 3498: 3495: 3492: 3487: 3484: 3481: 3476: 3473: 3470:, p. 153 3469: 3468:Hinrichs 2001 3464: 3461: 3458: 3453: 3450: 3447: 3442: 3439: 3436: 3435:Newmeyer 1996 3431: 3428: 3425: 3424:Newmeyer 1986 3420: 3417: 3414: 3409: 3406: 3403: 3398: 3395: 3392: 3387: 3384: 3380: 3379:Hinrichs 2001 3375: 3372: 3369: 3364: 3361: 3358: 3353: 3350: 3346: 3345:Hinrichs 2001 3341: 3338: 3335: 3330: 3328: 3324: 3320: 3315: 3312: 3309:, p. 216 3308: 3303: 3300: 3295: 3293:9780262034241 3289: 3286:. MIT Press. 3285: 3278: 3275: 3270: 3266: 3262: 3258: 3255:(2): 81–117. 3254: 3250: 3243: 3240: 3236: 3231: 3228: 3224: 3220: 3214: 3210: 3206: 3200: 3197: 3193: 3188: 3182: 3178: 3174: 3168: 3165: 3160: 3156: 3152: 3148: 3144: 3140: 3133: 3130: 3127:, p. 152 3126: 3121: 3119: 3115: 3111: 3106: 3103: 3099: 3094: 3091: 3088: 3083: 3080: 3077:, p. 117 3076: 3071: 3068: 3065:, p. 331 3064: 3059: 3056: 3053: 3048: 3045: 3042: 3037: 3034: 3031:, p. 250 3030: 3026: 3021: 3018: 3014: 3009: 3006: 3002: 2997: 2994: 2983:(November 18) 2982: 2978: 2971: 2968: 2957:on 2019-12-07 2953: 2949: 2942: 2935: 2932: 2921:on 2004-08-21 2920: 2916: 2910: 2907: 2902: 2896: 2892: 2888: 2882: 2880: 2878: 2874: 2863: 2857: 2853: 2849: 2845: 2838: 2836: 2834: 2830: 2826: 2821: 2818: 2814: 2809: 2807: 2805: 2803: 2799: 2795: 2790: 2788: 2786: 2782: 2778: 2773: 2771: 2767: 2763: 2758: 2756: 2754: 2750: 2746: 2741: 2739: 2737: 2733: 2728: 2726:0-631-20891-7 2722: 2718: 2711: 2709: 2707: 2705: 2703: 2701: 2699: 2697: 2695: 2693: 2689: 2685: 2680: 2678: 2674: 2670: 2665: 2663: 2659: 2647: 2643: 2636: 2634: 2630: 2627: 2622: 2619: 2613: 2607: 2601: 2598: 2594: 2590: 2586: 2580: 2577: 2573: 2569: 2564: 2561: 2557: 2556: 2551: 2547: 2543: 2539: 2533: 2530: 2526: 2522: 2517: 2514: 2509: 2505: 2499: 2496: 2492: 2491:Davidson 1967 2487: 2484: 2480: 2475: 2472: 2468: 2464: 2458: 2455: 2451: 2448:According to 2445: 2442: 2438: 2437:Newmeyer 1987 2433: 2430: 2427:, p. 103 2426: 2420: 2417: 2413: 2408: 2405: 2401: 2395: 2392: 2388: 2384: 2380: 2375: 2372: 2368: 2363: 2360: 2356: 2350: 2347: 2343: 2339: 2335: 2331: 2325: 2322: 2319: 2313: 2310: 2306: 2303:According to 2300: 2297: 2293: 2289: 2285: 2281: 2277: 2272: 2269: 2265: 2261: 2260:Voegelin 1958 2257: 2253: 2249: 2245: 2244:Oenbring 2009 2240: 2237: 2233: 2232:Hinrichs 2001 2228: 2225: 2221: 2215: 2212: 2208: 2207:Hinrichs 2001 2205:According to 2202: 2199: 2195: 2191: 2190:Hinrichs 2001 2185: 2182: 2178: 2174: 2170: 2166: 2160: 2157: 2153: 2147: 2144: 2140: 2136: 2130: 2127: 2123: 2118: 2115: 2111: 2107: 2102: 2099: 2095: 2090: 2087: 2083: 2079: 2074: 2071: 2067: 2062: 2059: 2055: 2050: 2047: 2043: 2039: 2035: 2031: 2025: 2022: 2018: 2012: 2009: 2005: 1999: 1996: 1984: 1980: 1975: 1969: 1966: 1962: 1958: 1954: 1950: 1944: 1941: 1937: 1931: 1928: 1924: 1918: 1915: 1911: 1906: 1903: 1900: 1896: 1893:According to 1890: 1887: 1883: 1880:According to 1877: 1875: 1871: 1867: 1861: 1858: 1854: 1848: 1845: 1841: 1837: 1833: 1829: 1825: 1821: 1815: 1813: 1809: 1805: 1799: 1796: 1790: 1785: 1783: 1781: 1777: 1773: 1771: 1767: 1766: 1761: 1757: 1755: 1751: 1747: 1739: 1737: 1734: 1730: 1726: 1725:Gerald Gazdar 1718: 1717: 1716: 1714: 1710: 1706: 1705:Zellig Harris 1702: 1698: 1694: 1690: 1686: 1682: 1674: 1673: 1672: 1670: 1666: 1662: 1658: 1654: 1650: 1646: 1642: 1638: 1634: 1630: 1623: 1620:Influence of 1619: 1618: 1617: 1615: 1614:introspective 1611: 1606: 1598: 1597: 1596: 1594: 1590: 1586: 1582: 1578: 1574: 1570: 1565: 1561: 1557: 1549: 1548: 1544: 1542: 1540: 1536: 1531: 1527: 1522: 1520: 1516: 1508: 1507: 1506: 1504: 1500: 1496: 1492: 1488: 1484: 1480: 1476: 1468: 1467: 1466: 1464: 1460: 1456: 1452: 1448: 1444: 1440: 1436: 1432: 1428: 1424: 1417: 1416: 1415: 1413: 1409: 1405: 1401: 1400:reinforcement 1397: 1393: 1389: 1388: 1383: 1379: 1375: 1367: 1366: 1362: 1360: 1358: 1354: 1349: 1347: 1343: 1339: 1335: 1331: 1327: 1323: 1319: 1314: 1312: 1308: 1304: 1300: 1296: 1292: 1288: 1284: 1280: 1276: 1275:Bloomfieldian 1272: 1268: 1264: 1260: 1252: 1247: 1245: 1242: 1238: 1237:Zellig Harris 1232: 1229: 1224: 1222: 1218: 1214: 1210: 1206: 1202: 1194: 1192: 1190: 1186: 1182: 1178: 1174: 1166: 1164: 1160: 1153: 1151: 1149: 1148:interrogative 1145: 1142: 1139: 1130: 1128: 1125: 1121: 1117: 1113: 1109: 1105: 1101: 1097: 1088: 1086: 1084: 1080: 1076: 1071: 1069: 1068:Zellig Harris 1065: 1057: 1055: 1053: 1050: 1046: 1042: 1038: 1034: 1030: 1026: 1018: 1013: 1009: 1007: 1003: 999: 995: 991: 987: 980: 972: 970: 968: 967:Rudolf Carnap 958: 955: 953: 949: 944: 939: 931: 926: 922: 914: 912: 910: 906: 902: 898: 893: 889: 885: 877: 872: 870: 868: 864: 860: 856: 852: 848: 843: 838: 833: 828: 814: 813:Bunpō no kōzō 809: 805: 801: 797: 793: 791: 787: 783: 779: 775: 771: 767: 763: 759: 755: 754: 749: 748:Bernard Bloch 744: 742: 738: 732: 729: 724: 722: 718: 714: 710: 706: 702: 698: 694: 690: 686: 684: 683: 678: 674: 670: 669: 660: 658: 656: 651: 647: 643: 642:arbitrariness 639: 634: 632: 628: 624: 619: 617: 613: 609: 605: 602: 597: 595: 590: 589:Bloomfieldian 586: 582: 581:structuralist 577: 571: 564: 560: 558: 557:Rudolf Carnap 554: 553:David Hilbert 548: 544: 540: 536: 532: 528: 526: 522: 518: 514: 510: 506: 501: 497: 486: 476: 472: 466: 464: 459:This section 457: 448: 447: 441: 439: 437: 433: 429: 425: 421: 416: 414: 410: 409: 404: 400: 396: 391: 389: 385: 381: 376: 374: 370: 369:Rudolf Carnap 366: 362: 358: 354: 350: 346: 341: 339: 335: 331: 327: 323: 322:Zellig Harris 319: 315: 311: 303: 298: 291: 289: 287: 283: 279: 274: 270: 266: 262: 258: 254: 250: 246: 241: 239: 235: 231: 227: 223: 219: 215: 211: 207: 203: 202:Zellig Harris 199: 195: 191: 186: 184: 180: 176: 172: 168: 164: 160: 156: 155: 146: 144: 140: 136: 133: 131: 127: 124:(unpublished 123: 119: 115: 111: 107: 103: 99: 96:February 1957 95: 89: 86: 83: 79: 76: 73: 70: 66: 62: 58: 55: 52: 48: 41: 36: 30: 19: 7036:Syntax books 6937: 6927: 6917: 6907: 6897: 6887: 6877: 6857: 6848: 6839: 6830: 6821: 6812: 6803: 6775:On Palestine 6773: 6763: 6753: 6743: 6733: 6723: 6713: 6703: 6693: 6672: 6662: 6652: 6642: 6632: 6622: 6612: 6602: 6592: 6579: 6569: 6556: 6546: 6536: 6506: 6496: 6486: 6476: 6466: 6456: 6428: 6418: 6408: 6398: 6388: 6379: 6378: 6364:bibliography 6322:Bibliography 6310:Noam Chomsky 6268:Google Books 6261: 6245: 6232: 6223: 6211: 6201: 6173: 6169: 6150: 6146: 6128: 6102: 6098: 6082: 6078: 6054: 6050: 6031: 6021: 5998: 5988: 5970: 5939: 5906: 5897: 5893: 5880: 5876: 5859: 5849: 5827: 5813: 5803: 5794: 5773:(1): 20–43, 5770: 5766: 5729: 5725: 5692: 5676: 5665:, retrieved 5658:the original 5637: 5633: 5610: 5589: 5585: 5561: 5557: 5518: 5514: 5505: 5493: 5477: 5473: 5464: 5443: 5423: 5398: 5394: 5372: 5346: 5342: 5338: 5326: 5322: 5311:, retrieved 5304:the original 5283: 5279: 5270: 5265:Lees, Robert 5246: 5235:, retrieved 5231:the original 5225: 5212: 5193: 5173: 5164: 5155: 5152:Joos, Martin 5134: 5115: 5105: 5096: 5067: 5063: 5042: 5026: 5022: 5010: 4991:, New York: 4987: 4970: 4966: 4960:(1): 133–156 4957: 4953: 4930: 4910: 4891: 4887: 4863: 4859: 4848:the original 4835: 4831: 4825: 4805: 4787: 4765: 4756: 4738: 4719: 4709: 4700: 4691: 4679: 4670: 4661: 4642: 4623: 4614: 4605: 4584:(1): 26–58, 4581: 4577: 4554: 4529: 4525: 4486: 4482: 4473: 4464: 4442: 4429: 4420: 4401: 4389:the original 4373: 4364:the original 4348: 4323:(1): 47–58, 4320: 4316: 4289: 4285: 4268:, retrieved 4264:the original 4259: 4231: 4220: 4195:Sampson 2001 4190: 4183:Sampson 1980 4178: 4171:Hockett 1968 4166: 4159:Hockett 1966 4154: 4147:Hockett 1965 4142: 4130:. Retrieved 4126: 4117: 4105: 4094: 4083: 4077:Skinner 1957 4072: 4066:Chomsky 1959 4046:. Retrieved 4042: 4032: 4020: 4008: 3997: 3992:, p. 74 3985: 3973: 3968:, p. 92 3961: 3950: 3939: 3928: 3917: 3911:Aronoff 2014 3906: 3894: 3889:, p. 24 3882: 3871: 3859: 3852:Chomsky 1957 3837:Chomsky 1957 3832: 3827:, p. 93 3825:Chomsky 1957 3820: 3815:, p. 91 3813:Chomsky 1957 3808: 3801:Chomsky 1957 3796: 3789:Chomsky 1957 3784: 3773: 3754: 3747:Collins 2008 3742: 3735:Chomsky 1957 3730: 3725:, p. 46 3723:Chomsky 1957 3710:, p. 45 3708:Chomsky 1957 3693:Chomsky 1957 3688: 3681:Chomsky 1957 3676: 3671:, p. 18 3669:Chomsky 1957 3664: 3652: 3640: 3634:Tomalin 2002 3629: 3624:, p. 16 3622:Chomsky 1957 3617: 3610:Chomsky 1957 3605: 3598:Chomsky 1957 3593: 3581: 3569: 3557: 3550:Chomsky 1970 3545: 3538:Chomsky 1974 3533: 3521: 3509: 3502:Chomsky 1969 3497: 3491:Chomsky 1963 3486: 3480:Chomsky 1962 3475: 3463: 3457:Chomsky 1975 3452: 3441: 3430: 3419: 3408: 3402:Koerner 2002 3397: 3386: 3374: 3363: 3352: 3340: 3314: 3302: 3283: 3277: 3252: 3248: 3242: 3235:Chomsky 1957 3230: 3222: 3208: 3199: 3190: 3176: 3167: 3145:(1): 69–66. 3142: 3138: 3132: 3125:Sampson 2001 3112:, p. 86 3105: 3100:, p. 83 3093: 3087:Chomsky 1953 3082: 3070: 3058: 3047: 3036: 3025:Chomsky 1975 3020: 3008: 3003:, p. 48 2996: 2985:. Retrieved 2980: 2970: 2959:. Retrieved 2952:the original 2947: 2934: 2923:. Retrieved 2919:the original 2909: 2890: 2865:. Retrieved 2851: 2827:, p. 85 2825:Chomsky 1957 2820: 2815:, p. 49 2813:Chomsky 1957 2796:, p. 13 2794:Chomsky 1957 2779:, p. 44 2777:Chomsky 1957 2762:Tomalin 2006 2716: 2686:, p. 17 2684:Chomsky 1957 2671:, p. 15 2669:Chomsky 1957 2649:. Retrieved 2645: 2621: 2600: 2579: 2568:Hockett 1968 2563: 2553: 2548:in 1875 and 2545: 2532: 2516: 2507: 2498: 2486: 2479:Stokhof 2012 2474: 2467:Chomsky 1957 2462: 2457: 2444: 2432: 2425:Chomsky 1957 2419: 2412:Chomsky 1957 2407: 2400:Chomsky 1978 2394: 2382: 2379:Sampson 1980 2374: 2367:Chomsky 1957 2362: 2355:Chomsky 1965 2349: 2341: 2338:Chomsky 1965 2330:Chomsky 1959 2324: 2312: 2305:Heitner 2005 2299: 2291: 2279: 2271: 2266:, p. 3) 2264:Chomsky 1975 2239: 2227: 2214: 2201: 2193: 2184: 2176: 2173:Chomsky 1956 2168: 2164: 2159: 2152:Chomsky 1979 2146: 2129: 2122:Chomsky 1951 2117: 2109: 2106:Tomalin 2006 2101: 2089: 2081: 2078:Tomalin 2003 2073: 2061: 2054:Chomsky 1975 2049: 2038:Chomsky 1975 2024: 2017:Chomsky 1975 2011: 1998: 1986:. Retrieved 1983:Chomsky.info 1982: 1968: 1963:, p. 10 1948: 1943: 1930: 1917: 1905: 1889: 1866:Chomsky 1965 1860: 1853:Chomsky 1957 1847: 1831: 1827: 1804:Chomsky 1957 1798: 1775: 1774: 1763: 1759: 1758: 1753: 1743: 1732: 1722: 1712: 1708: 1684: 1680: 1678: 1668: 1664: 1660: 1652: 1648: 1644: 1640: 1636: 1632: 1628: 1626: 1621: 1602: 1568: 1563: 1553: 1538: 1523: 1518: 1514: 1512: 1509:Neuroscience 1498: 1495:Chomsky 1956 1490: 1487:Turing Award 1483:Donald Knuth 1474: 1472: 1422: 1421: 1385: 1382:B.F. Skinner 1373: 1371: 1356: 1352: 1350: 1321: 1315: 1306: 1303:R. H. Robins 1298: 1286: 1262: 1256: 1233: 1227: 1225: 1223:of science. 1212: 1208: 1204: 1198: 1170: 1161: 1157: 1134: 1108:observations 1092: 1072: 1063: 1061: 1022: 1016: 982: 964: 956: 942: 940: 936: 883: 881: 807: 803: 799: 795: 794: 789: 781: 773: 765: 761: 751: 745: 740: 736: 733: 727: 725: 716: 713:Morris Halle 708: 704: 687: 680: 672: 666: 664: 649: 641: 637: 635: 620: 611: 598: 578: 575: 569: 562: 550: 546: 542: 538: 534: 530: 516: 512: 508: 495: 493: 480: 460: 435: 431: 417: 412: 406: 392: 387: 377: 342: 333: 307: 304:(1977 photo) 301: 285: 278:sociobiology 272: 244: 242: 193: 187: 163:Noam Chomsky 153: 152: 151: 141: 126:mimeographed 120: 54:Noam Chomsky 29: 6922:(2003) (TV) 6870:Filmography 6796:works about 6686:Collections 6371:Linguistics 6214:, Routledge 5401:(1): 1–18, 5335:Lyons, John 5269:"Review of 5013:, Chicago: 4894:: 199–235, 4824:"Chomsky's 4278:Bach, Emmon 4244:Works cited 4214:Pullum 2011 4132:16 November 4088:Searle 1972 4013:Robins 1967 3990:Thorne 1965 3955:Postal 1964 3876:Harris 1989 3866:, Chapter 3 3864:Harris 1993 3659:, p. 2 3657:Carnap 1934 3446:Searle 2002 3413:Kibbee 2010 3381:, p. 2 3347:, p. 5 3334:Hamans 2014 3319:Barsky 1997 3192:concevables 3110:Barsky 1997 3098:Barsky 1997 3063:Graffi 2001 3052:Carnap 1934 3029:Thomas 2012 3013:Barsky 1997 3001:Barsky 1997 2764:, p. . 2747:, p. . 2745:Joseph 2002 2591:(HPSG) and 2542:Karl Verner 2387:Harris 1951 2288:Searle 1972 2276:Thorne 1965 2248:Harris 1993 2220:Hamans 2014 2004:Harris 1951 1988:16 November 1974:Barsky 1997 1961:Barsky 1997 1910:Pullum 2011 1895:Joseph 2002 1675:Originality 1581:abstraction 1562:considered 1431:John Searle 1404:behaviorist 1392:acquisition 1279:Paul Postal 1271:Martin Joos 1261:wrote that 869:languages. 776:. Although 721:festschrift 661:Publication 657:in humans. 631:Rulon Wells 627:verb phrase 517:inventories 357:mathematics 338:linguistics 234:in the mind 159:linguistics 7015:Categories 6982:(daughter) 6780:Ilan Pappé 6275:(archived) 6153:(3): 468, 5989:The Nation 5667:2016-10-22 5313:2009-09-17 5237:2009-09-17 4866:: 304–23, 4270:2017-10-08 4099:Quine 1969 4002:Lyons 1966 3966:Levin 1965 3899:Brown 2010 3307:Sklar 1968 3218:2707301345 3186:2707301345 3041:Quine 1951 2987:2020-02-25 2981:The Nation 2961:2020-02-25 2925:2019-12-31 2900:0299024709 2867:2020-02-26 2861:3110172798 2651:14 October 2614:References 2521:Boden 2006 2504:Knuth 2003 2450:Brown 2010 2284:Sklar 1968 2066:Otero 1994 1545:Criticisms 1459:utterances 1447:psychology 1443:philosophy 1418:Philosophy 1368:Psychology 1342:morphology 1330:empiricist 1320:considers 1295:John Lyons 1104:utterances 977:See also: 919:See also: 770:revolution 463:unbalanced 353:philosophy 326:department 292:Background 6107:CiteSeerX 6071:144201727 5991:: 213–217 5900:(3): 33–6 5654:189881482 4759:(1): 7–26 4306:145793812 3978:Bach 1965 3944:Joos 1961 3763:Post 1944 3759:Post 1943 3600:, Preface 3391:Lees 1957 3207:(1971) . 3175:(1971) . 2889:(1969) . 2626:Cook 2007 2334:Post 1944 2034:inductive 1744:In 2000, 1689:Emil Post 1610:intuition 1587:that our 1524:In 2015, 1378:mentalist 1346:phonology 1248:Reception 1181:phonology 1075:Emil Post 1041:morphemes 829:, titled 693:The Hague 625:into the 594:sociology 513:terminals 483:July 2023 475:talk page 265:computers 249:knowledge 179:semantics 167:monograph 130:microfilm 81:Publisher 6961:(father) 6794:Academic 6531:" (1967) 6520:Politics 6451:" (1973) 6442:" (1970) 6243:(2000), 6222:(1993), 6199:(2011), 6057:: 73–6, 5969:(1957), 5938:(1949), 5925:38258131 5871:(1972), 5848:(1980), 5825:(1967), 5756:26842058 5625:(1982), 5609:(1964), 5547:21224415 5395:Language 5280:Language 5267:(1957), 5223:(2003), 5064:Language 5029:: 1–30, 4880:14720789 4860:Synthese 4578:Language 4546:19519474 4511:11796020 4463:(1949), 4440:(1934), 4399:(2006), 4346:(1997), 4317:Language 4286:Diogenes 4280:(1965), 4254:(2014), 3249:Language 3139:Language 2587:(GPSG), 2558:in 1916. 2342:erzeugen 1701:top-down 1328:yet non- 1185:phonemic 1141:negative 1116:phonemes 1054:system. 1045:phonemes 873:Contents 762:Language 753:Language 655:mutation 612:Language 566:— 380:phonetic 371:. Quine 267:and the 238:behavior 60:Language 6991:Related 6805:Chomsky 6264:preview 5787:2181906 5578:2371809 5538:3038732 5363:2218520 5329:: 83–94 4503:2267409 4048:18 July 2850:(ed.). 1573:fallacy 1396:stimuli 1291:Kuhnian 1177:meaning 1144:passive 1138:English 1120:phrases 1083:strings 1049:English 892:grammar 867:Swedish 855:Italian 851:Spanish 469:Please 461:may be 345:methods 183:meaning 68:Subject 63:English 6951:Family 6942:(2013) 6932:(2004) 6912:(2003) 6902:(2002) 6892:(2001) 6882:(1992) 6768:(2012) 6765:Occupy 6758:(2012) 6748:(2011) 6738:(2010) 6728:(2007) 6718:(2005) 6708:(2003) 6698:(1996) 6677:(2017) 6667:(2006) 6657:(2003) 6647:(1997) 6637:(1994) 6627:(1993) 6617:(1993) 6607:(1991) 6597:(1989) 6574:(1983) 6551:(1973) 6541:(1969) 6511:(2000) 6501:(1995) 6491:(1986) 6481:(1981) 6471:(1975) 6461:(1975) 6433:(1968) 6423:(1968) 6413:(1966) 6403:(1965) 6393:(1964) 6383:(1957) 6362:Select 6135: 6109: 6099:Lingua 6079:Lingua 6069: 6039: 6006: 5977: 5956: 5923: 5913: 5835: 5785: 5754: 5707: 5652: 5576: 5545: 5535: 5451: 5431: 5415:415597 5413: 5380: 5361: 5300:411160 5298: 5254: 5201: 5180: 5141: 5123: 5084:411873 5082: 5049: 4999: 4938: 4918: 4878: 4812: 4794: 4772: 4745: 4727: 4650: 4630: 4598:411334 4596: 4562: 4544: 4509: 4501: 4450: 4409: 4381: 4356: 4337:410452 4335: 4304: 3290: 3269:410382 3267: 3215: 3183: 3159:410221 3157: 2897: 2858: 2723: 2595:(LFG). 2336:". In 1957:Hebrew 1740:Honors 1577:formal 1455:innate 1435:Keynes 1338:syntax 1326:formal 1189:corpus 1173:formal 1100:corpus 1019:(1957) 901:sounds 897:corpus 888:syntax 847:Korean 399:formal 373:showed 355:, and 314:Arabic 232:place 230:innate 214:formal 175:syntax 145: 75:syntax 50:Author 6067:S2CID 5783:JSTOR 5752:S2CID 5722:(PDF) 5689:(PDF) 5661:(PDF) 5650:S2CID 5630:(PDF) 5574:JSTOR 5470:(PDF) 5411:JSTOR 5359:JSTOR 5307:(PDF) 5296:JSTOR 5276:(PDF) 5080:JSTOR 4876:S2CID 4594:JSTOR 4542:S2CID 4522:(PDF) 4507:S2CID 4499:JSTOR 4333:JSTOR 4302:S2CID 3765:and 3265:JSTOR 3155:JSTOR 2955:(PDF) 2944:(PDF) 2846:. In 2194:Janua 1851:From 1802:From 1791:Notes 1693:proof 1439:Freud 1221:ethos 1217:logos 905:words 859:Czech 820:文法の構造 507:book 403:logic 349:logic 269:brain 109:Pages 104:Print 6133:ISBN 6037:ISBN 6004:ISBN 5975:ISBN 5954:ISBN 5921:OCLC 5911:ISBN 5883:(12) 5833:ISBN 5705:ISBN 5543:PMID 5449:ISBN 5429:ISBN 5378:ISBN 5252:ISBN 5199:ISBN 5178:ISBN 5139:ISBN 5121:ISBN 5047:ISBN 4997:ISBN 4936:ISBN 4916:ISBN 4810:ISBN 4792:ISBN 4770:ISBN 4757:Glot 4743:ISBN 4725:ISBN 4648:ISBN 4628:ISBN 4560:ISBN 4448:ISBN 4407:ISBN 4379:ISBN 4354:ISBN 4134:2016 4050:2017 3288:ISBN 3213:ISBN 3181:ISBN 2895:ISBN 2856:ISBN 2721:ISBN 2653:2016 2646:Time 2398:See 2110:LSLT 1990:2016 1934:See 1921:See 1838:and 1780:Time 1669:LSLT 1665:LSLT 1649:LSLT 1641:LSLT 1445:and 1408:mind 1398:and 1241:Lees 1112:laws 1031:and 988:, a 923:and 907:and 865:and 790:LSLT 682:WORD 673:LSLT 555:and 515:and 436:LSLT 413:LSLT 367:and 255:and 253:mind 6266:in 6178:doi 6155:doi 6117:doi 6103:113 6087:doi 6083:112 6059:doi 5944:hdl 5775:doi 5742:hdl 5734:doi 5697:doi 5642:doi 5594:doi 5566:doi 5533:PMC 5523:doi 5519:108 5482:doi 5403:doi 5351:doi 5288:doi 5072:doi 5031:doi 4975:doi 4896:doi 4868:doi 4840:doi 4586:doi 4534:doi 4491:doi 4325:doi 4294:doi 3761:, 3257:doi 3147:doi 2572:God 2552:'s 2544:'s 2353:In 2328:In 1731:in 1528:at 1437:or 1384:'s 1102:of 1062:In 943:not 882:In 636:In 523:in 420:MIT 415:). 185:). 128:or 112:117 7017:: 6174:24 6172:, 6151:28 6149:, 6115:, 6101:, 6081:, 6065:, 6053:, 5952:, 5934:; 5919:, 5898:49 5896:, 5892:, 5881:18 5879:, 5875:, 5781:, 5771:60 5769:, 5750:, 5740:, 5730:20 5728:, 5724:, 5703:, 5691:, 5648:, 5636:, 5632:, 5621:; 5590:50 5588:, 5572:, 5562:65 5560:, 5541:, 5531:, 5517:, 5478:28 5476:, 5472:, 5409:, 5399:62 5397:, 5357:, 5347:16 5345:, 5325:, 5294:, 5284:33 5282:, 5278:, 5095:, 5078:, 5068:41 5066:, 5027:27 5025:, 4995:, 4971:19 4969:, 4958:24 4956:, 4952:, 4892:13 4874:, 4864:17 4862:, 4836:17 4834:, 4830:, 4592:, 4582:35 4580:, 4576:, 4540:, 4528:, 4524:, 4505:, 4497:, 4487:18 4485:, 4331:, 4321:29 4319:, 4300:, 4290:13 4288:, 4284:, 4202:^ 4125:. 4058:^ 4041:. 3844:^ 3715:^ 3700:^ 3326:^ 3263:. 3253:23 3251:. 3221:. 3189:. 3153:. 3143:30 3141:. 3117:^ 2979:. 2946:. 2876:^ 2832:^ 2801:^ 2784:^ 2769:^ 2752:^ 2735:^ 2691:^ 2676:^ 2661:^ 2644:. 2632:^ 2294:". 2112:." 1981:. 1873:^ 1811:^ 1782:. 1715:. 1659:, 1521:. 1465:. 1118:, 1027:, 954:. 911:. 903:, 861:, 857:, 853:, 849:, 596:. 438:. 351:, 251:, 240:, 6527:" 6447:" 6438:" 6339:" 6335:" 6302:e 6295:t 6288:v 6180:: 6157:: 6119:: 6089:: 6061:: 6055:1 5946:: 5777:: 5744:: 5736:: 5699:: 5644:: 5638:4 5596:: 5568:: 5525:: 5484:: 5405:: 5365:. 5353:: 5327:1 5316:. 5290:: 5273:" 5186:. 5086:. 5074:: 5033:: 4977:: 4898:: 4870:: 4842:: 4588:: 4536:: 4530:2 4493:: 4327:: 4296:: 4136:. 4052:. 3588:. 3576:. 3564:. 3552:. 3540:. 3528:. 3516:. 3504:. 3296:. 3271:. 3259:: 3161:. 3149:: 2990:. 2964:. 2928:. 2903:. 2870:. 2729:. 2655:. 2465:( 2385:( 2179:. 2171:( 1992:. 1842:. 1608:" 946:" 823:) 817:( 806:( 671:( 485:) 481:( 477:. 467:. 411:( 20:)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index