817:
the topic. They are not meant to exclude relevant, but undisputed information and in fact, editors are constantly implored to be inclusive of information via a verity of methods where the inclusion is not given undue weight in the article. Adding Lyme disease as a rare cause of DM is supported by the literature, it is not disputed by the literature and there is nothing in the guidelines that prevent it's inclusion in the article as long as the inclusion is appropriately written and weighted.
190:
839:. The way to solve this is find a few MEDRS sources (reviews in good journals published in the last five years or so, or statements from major medical/scientific bodies) that discuss the relevance of Lyme to DM. That is how things work. You will notice I took a lot of time updating the article. I read a lot and as I said I found no sources discussing Lyme. But maybe I missed something. It is unlikely, but maybe.
166:
965:
22:
84:
53:
94:
226:
977:
874:
Nope, the policies and guidelines are built the way they are to ensure that articles are neutral and not influenced -- by inclusion or exclusion -- by what editors who show up here happen to care about. I have spent as much time as I am willing on this. I won't respond further until you bring a few
859:
No that's not how things work. There is nothing in the guidelines that exclude sources more than five years old, or exclude secondary sources and the guidelines implore editors to be inclusive. I've fully stated this in my previous edit. You are applying guidelines as rigid rules to exclude relevant,
816:
Are there sources that dispute that Lyme
Disease can be a causative agent of DM? Is this a controversial topic within the literature? NPOV and the other guidelines you refer to are in place to arbitrate between minority and/or extreme views that run in opposition to the main current of information on
578:
Dermatomyositis is rare. Lyme induced dermatomyositis is rarer still but it is a form of
Dermatomyositis that responds well to treatment and is "curable". Dr Steere's article has been referenced many times in articles describing successful treatment of lyme disease induced Dermatomyositis, and in at
688:
an essential guideline. The way we work is that we read a bunch of MEDRS sources and summarize them, giving WEIGHT according to what the articles say - we don't enter the process looking for X. That said I did keep an eye peeled for Lyme stuff since I knew you were interested in it. But recent
676:
There is abundant literature showing that Lyme
Disease can induce dermatomyositis and/or mimic it's symptoms. You know that the literature and case studies exist but you chose to remove all reference to it. It is a rare cause of this disease, and thus not mentioned in reviews but it does happen and
891:
Damwiki1 thanks for bringing up the possible DM-Lyme connection, i agree it should be mentioned in the article, no matter if your reference is 5 or 25 years old, i agree there might be censorship going on by the orthodoxy on wikipedia, and possible conflicts of interest. Anyway im thankfull to you
794:
Please note that every time you make an edit to
Knowledge, you agree to follow the Terms of Use (they are linked at the bottom of every edit window). They obligate you -- you -- like every editor, to follow the policies and guidelines. You too have to follow NPOV and you need to frame your
418:
The page currently refers to
Grotton Lesions and Gottron's Papules. Are these synonymous, or do they refer to different findings? I was under the impression that Gottron's Papules were the correct name, but a brief online search reveals some references to both, so I am
347:
What is the basis for adding "priapism" to this article? This needs a reference. I could find no such reference in UpToDate or on PubMed. The ANA titer levels correlating to negative and positive need to be addressed. It currently appears that the levels are inversed.
942:
I think a section that discusses how DM overlaps with many other autoimmune conditions and that it can mimic other conditions is worthwhile. Mentioning co-morbidity with Lyme and other conditions can better describe the somewhat nebulous nature of DM, especially
659:
We give WEIGHT to things per what reliable sources say. I pulled a bunch of new MEDRS sources into this article and none of them even talk about Lyme, much less Steere's thoughts about the relationship between Lyme and DM. We follow sources.
644:
Censorship in action. What a travesty - people will die because rare causes of this disease have been removed from the article thus preventing patients and physicians alike from having ready access to vital information that could save
799:
works - we look at the recent high quality sources and we summarize them, giving WEIGHT as the sources give WEIGHT. Nothing in WP is about what you want or what I want - the work here is to summarize high quality sources.
311:
i think it would be a very good idea to have a caption describing where and what the pathology is.where it is is fairly obvious, but i'm still not entirely sure what i'm looking at. just atrophy of the quadriceps?
356:
olivier was created a life peer, baron olivier of brighton in 1970, before he contracted dermatomyositis. there is no rationale for listing him as anything other than such.'sir' laurence is absolutely incorrect.
734:. Even though newer reviews don't mention Lyme Disease that doesn't mean that all mention of it should be excluded from the article, as per the guidelines (do you understand the definition of the word
714:
that is a ten year old case report. like i said, MEDRS sources (reviews published in the last five years or so, and statements by major medical/scientific bodies) don't find this worth talking about.
579:
least one case where a patient's life was saved. I think it is incumbent on wikipedia editors to leave this quote in the article in the absence of any controversy in the medical literature about it.
267:
175:
63:
199:
112:
67:
236:
116:
375:
This is the only place I've seen priapism listed as a symptom of DM, and I'm a DM patient and I've spent a lot of time researching the literature on this rare disease.
522:
518:
504:
261:
1031:
180:
602:. If there are no reviews discussing this it shouldn't be here at all. I will look to see what reviews have to say about the stuff he was talking about.
1046:
204:
1021:
156:
146:
1036:
1056:
738:?). You are applying the guidelines rigidly in such a way as to game the system to censor the article. I question your objectivity on this issue.
1051:
1026:
985:
1041:
902:
780:
which excludes non-controversial, undisputed, relevant information which is scientifically verified from being included in the article.
121:
1016:
391:
376:
280:
772:
You are trying to misuse wikipedia guidelines and policy to exclude non-disputed information from the article. There is nothing in
923:
390:"Gottron's papules", pink patches on the knuckles and other extensor surfaces, and priapism, are associated with this disorder."
629:
756:; making an argument that personalizes the discussion doesn't help your effort to get this content included -- it harms it.
107:
58:
470:
33:
730:
The article was published in a reliable medical journal, it reviews 28 case reports which makes it a secondary source.
633:
384:
521:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
948:
906:
295:
680:
It is for everyone! And everyone who edits has to follow the policies and guidelines. Above I referred to
395:
380:
560:
540:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
528:
39:
997:
898:
495:
401:
275:
892:
for bringing up this connection, i will not edit the wiki because this issue needs more discussion.
21:
981:
944:
893:
625:
361:
332:
317:
968:
This article was the subject of a Wiki
Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between
865:
822:
785:
743:
650:
594:
an old primary source and a long quote are not how we write about health in WP - please see both
584:
525:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
541:
420:
452:
588:
932:
880:
844:
805:
796:
761:
719:
694:
665:
607:
599:
556:
706:
548:
993:
836:
777:
685:
595:
460:
442:
99:
689:
reviews don't find the relationship between Lyme and DM worth discussing. Not my fault.
471:
http://web.archive.org/web/20141213061224/http://arthritis-research.com/content/14/1/R22
773:
753:
681:
617:
507:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
424:
357:
328:
313:
241:
547:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
189:
1010:
861:
818:
781:
739:
646:
580:
835:
The MEDRS sources just don't mention Lyme. That is a serious problem in policy per
165:
474:
964:
928:
876:
840:
801:
757:
715:
690:
661:
603:
514:
513:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
89:
677:
it deserves to be mentioned rather than censored. Knowledge is for everyone.
875:
solid MEDRS sources to support adding something about lyme. best regards
795:
discussion in light of the policies and guidelines. I have explained how
1001:
952:
936:
910:
884:
869:
848:
826:
809:
789:
765:
747:
723:
698:
669:
654:
637:
611:
568:
457:
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add
428:
405:
365:
336:
321:
289:
256:
327:
what is that anterior to rhe femoral condyles and below the patella?
371:
This is the only place I've seen priapism listed as a symptom of DM
225:
83:
52:
465:
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
119:. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at
705:
Here's a secondary source that reviews numerous case studies:
220:
15:
111:, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the
480:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
234:
for
Knowledge's health content are defined in the guideline
188:
164:
959:
Wiki
Education assignment: Knowledge for the Medical Editor
860:
undisputed, non controversial material from the article.
441:
I have just added archive links to one external link on
370:
446:
517:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
281:
clinical publications about evidence-based medicine
237:Knowledge:Identifying reliable sources (medicine)
115:and that biomedical information in any article
503:This message was posted before February 2018.
475:http://arthritis-research.com/content/14/1/R22
113:Manual of Style for medicine-related articles
8:
896:
47:
262:review articles from the past five years
49:
19:
492:to let others know (documentation at
7:
752:Those arguments are not relevant to
290:Centre for Reviews and Dissemination
105:This article is within the scope of
1032:Mid-importance dermatology articles
122:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Medicine
38:It is of interest to the following
973:
969:
573:
414:Gottron vs Grotton lesions/papules
14:
1047:Mid-importance neurology articles
732:It's conclusions are not disputed
684:which is an essential policy and
445:. Please take a moment to review
287:Other potential sources include:
1022:Mid-importance medicine articles
976:. Further details are available
963:
224:
117:use high-quality medical sources
92:
82:
51:
20:
1037:Dermatology task force articles
151:This article has been rated as
1057:All WikiProject Medicine pages
574:Dr Steere's article and quote.
131:Knowledge:WikiProject Medicine
1:
1052:Neurology task force articles
992:— Assignment last updated by
911:17:16, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
885:21:06, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
870:20:36, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
849:19:40, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
827:18:58, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
810:18:32, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
790:18:12, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
766:17:18, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
748:17:13, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
724:08:47, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
699:07:54, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
670:07:33, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
655:07:28, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
569:20:37, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
337:22:55, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
322:22:51, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
248:sources of information about
197:This article is supported by
173:This article is supported by
134:Template:WikiProject Medicine
1027:B-Class dermatology articles
1002:16:20, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
953:14:48, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
638:20:35, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
612:20:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
589:19:49, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
366:17:14, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
1073:
1042:B-Class neurology articles
937:13:11, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
534:(last update: 5 June 2024)
463:|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
438:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
176:the Dermatology task force
157:project's importance scale
1017:B-Class medicine articles
406:02:28, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
385:02:21, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
196:
172:
150:
77:
46:
429:19:48, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
200:the Neurology task force
922:See also for example :
711:please sign your posts.
616:Agree not appropriate.
434:External links modified
343:Clinical manifestations
193:
169:
28:This article is rated
980:. Student editor(s):
192:
168:
515:regular verification
449:. If necessary, add
268:free review articles
244:. Here are links to
108:WikiProject Medicine
505:After February 2018
484:parameter below to
978:on the course page
918:And Lyme disease ?
510:InternetArchiveBot
240:and are typically
194:
170:
34:content assessment
913:
901:comment added by
567:
535:
304:
303:
219:
218:
215:
214:
211:
210:
137:medicine articles
1064:
1004:
986:article contribs
975:
974:23 February 2024
971:
967:
622:
563:
562:Talk to my owner
558:
533:
532:
511:
499:
464:
456:
409:
228:
221:
139:
138:
135:
132:
129:
102:
97:
96:
95:
86:
79:
78:
73:
70:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
1072:
1071:
1067:
1066:
1065:
1063:
1062:
1061:
1007:
1006:
991:
970:29 January 2024
961:
920:
618:
576:
566:
561:
526:
519:have permission
509:
493:
458:
450:
443:Dermatomyositis
436:
416:
399:
373:
354:
345:
309:
250:Dermatomyositis
246:possibly useful
242:review articles
136:
133:
130:
127:
126:
100:Medicine portal
98:
93:
91:
71:
61:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
1070:
1068:
1060:
1059:
1054:
1049:
1044:
1039:
1034:
1029:
1024:
1019:
1009:
1008:
982:Rohanbhattaram
960:
957:
956:
955:
945:Rohanbhattaram
943:pre-diagnosis.
926:
924:Google scholar
919:
916:
915:
914:
889:
888:
887:
857:
856:
855:
854:
853:
852:
851:
814:
813:
812:
770:
769:
768:
728:
727:
726:
712:
703:
702:
701:
674:
673:
672:
642:
641:
640:
575:
572:
559:
553:
552:
545:
478:
477:
469:Added archive
435:
432:
415:
412:
411:
410:
404:comment added
372:
369:
353:
350:
344:
341:
340:
339:
308:
305:
302:
301:
300:
299:
285:
272:
253:
229:
217:
216:
213:
212:
209:
208:
205:Mid-importance
195:
185:
184:
181:Mid-importance
171:
161:
160:
153:Mid-importance
149:
143:
142:
140:
104:
103:
87:
75:
74:
72:Mid‑importance
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1069:
1058:
1055:
1053:
1050:
1048:
1045:
1043:
1040:
1038:
1035:
1033:
1030:
1028:
1025:
1023:
1020:
1018:
1015:
1014:
1012:
1005:
1003:
999:
995:
989:
987:
983:
979:
966:
958:
954:
950:
946:
941:
940:
939:
938:
934:
930:
925:
917:
912:
908:
904:
903:172.58.143.45
900:
895:
890:
886:
882:
878:
873:
872:
871:
867:
863:
858:
850:
846:
842:
838:
834:
833:
832:
831:
830:
829:
828:
824:
820:
815:
811:
807:
803:
798:
793:
792:
791:
787:
783:
779:
775:
771:
767:
763:
759:
755:
751:
750:
749:
745:
741:
737:
733:
729:
725:
721:
717:
713:
710:
709:
708:
707:Lyme Myositis
704:
700:
696:
692:
687:
683:
679:
678:
675:
671:
667:
663:
658:
657:
656:
652:
648:
643:
639:
635:
631:
627:
623:
621:
615:
614:
613:
609:
605:
601:
597:
593:
592:
591:
590:
586:
582:
571:
570:
564:
557:
550:
546:
543:
539:
538:
537:
530:
524:
520:
516:
512:
506:
501:
497:
491:
487:
483:
476:
472:
468:
467:
466:
462:
454:
448:
444:
439:
433:
431:
430:
426:
422:
413:
407:
403:
397:
393:
389:
388:
387:
386:
382:
378:
368:
367:
363:
359:
351:
349:
342:
338:
334:
330:
326:
325:
324:
323:
319:
315:
306:
298:
297:
292:
291:
286:
283:
282:
277:
276:TRIP database
273:
270:
269:
264:
263:
258:
255:
254:
251:
247:
243:
239:
238:
233:
232:Ideal sources
230:
227:
223:
222:
206:
203:(assessed as
202:
201:
191:
187:
186:
182:
179:(assessed as
178:
177:
167:
163:
162:
158:
154:
148:
145:
144:
141:
124:
123:
118:
114:
110:
109:
101:
90:
88:
85:
81:
80:
76:
69:
65:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
990:
962:
921:
897:— Preceding
735:
731:
619:
577:
554:
529:source check
508:
502:
489:
485:
481:
479:
440:
437:
417:
392:50.71.50.249
377:50.71.50.249
374:
355:
346:
310:
294:
288:
279:
266:
260:
249:
245:
235:
231:
198:
174:
152:
120:
106:
40:WikiProjects
496:Sourcecheck
400:—Preceding
307:X-ray image
64:Dermatology
1011:Categories
994:Mhrichards
419:uncertain.
265:(limit to
797:WP:WEIGHT
736:guideline
620:Doc James
600:WP:MEDMOS
549:this tool
542:this tool
358:Toyokuni3
329:Toyokuni3
314:Toyokuni3
278:provides
259:provides
68:Neurology
899:unsigned
894:other168
862:Damwiki1
837:WP:UNDUE
819:Damwiki1
782:Damwiki1
778:WP:MEDRS
740:Damwiki1
686:WP:MEDRS
647:Damwiki1
630:contribs
596:WP:MEDRS
581:Damwiki1
555:Cheers.—
453:cbignore
128:Medicine
59:Medicine
774:WP:NPOV
754:WP:NPOV
682:WP:NPOV
565::Online
482:checked
447:my edit
402:undated
352:Olivier
155:on the
30:B-class
929:Lamiot
877:Jytdog
841:Jytdog
802:Jytdog
758:Jytdog
716:Jytdog
691:Jytdog
662:Jytdog
645:lives.
604:Jytdog
490:failed
461:nobots
257:PubMed
36:scale.
634:email
998:talk
972:and
949:talk
933:talk
907:talk
881:talk
866:talk
845:talk
823:talk
806:talk
786:talk
762:talk
744:talk
720:talk
695:talk
666:talk
651:talk
626:talk
608:talk
598:and
585:talk
486:true
425:talk
421:Yv-F
396:talk
381:talk
362:talk
333:talk
318:talk
293:and
274:The
988:).
776:or
523:RfC
500:).
488:or
473:to
398:)
296:CDC
147:Mid
1013::
1000:)
951:)
935:)
927:--
909:)
883:)
868:)
847:)
825:)
808:)
788:)
764:)
746:)
722:)
697:)
668:)
653:)
636:)
632:·
628:·
610:)
587:)
536:.
531:}}
527:{{
498:}}
494:{{
459:{{
455:}}
451:{{
427:)
383:)
364:)
335:)
320:)
207:).
183:).
66:/
62::
996:(
984:(
947:(
931:(
905:(
879:(
864:(
843:(
821:(
804:(
784:(
760:(
742:(
718:(
693:(
664:(
649:(
624:(
606:(
583:(
551:.
544:.
423:(
408:.
394:(
379:(
360:(
331:(
316:(
284:.
271:)
252:.
159:.
125:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
