1982:
1026:"Epic Fail"in this context should have its own page, this is a specific meme that has grown into wider usage, originally used in World of Warcraft communities. "Epic" being the highest quality item available (there was an "artifact" quality level which was not available apart from by accidents on live servers), the word "epic" was used to denote an extreme situation, such as loosing an epic item on a roll of 99 which would be epic fail, or out rolling a 99 which would be Epic Win!
31:
1840:
find mistakes and fixes them. Page text. Pathingfinder
Failure: While in a lost state of mind you find a purpose to help lift the state of mind you are in and helps you find a new purpose Dart-type Failure: Failing to meet a certain goal that was placed by you or someone else. Page text. Everyday Failure: Small tasks in everyday life that are not seen as a big failure. Such tasks include waking up early, losing a bet, or losing a game.
1901:
failure article and how it helps show failure. Failboat or consignment of fail is a popular macro series, featuring images of cargo vessels tipping over or shedding cargo, with captions such as 'the failboat has arrived', or 'all aboard the failboat'. The original vessel whose image was used was the MV Cougar Ace, although the Ital
Florida, the MV Napoli and even the SS Normandy, sunk at her berth in New York Harbor, have appeared,
896:, a popular fail blog that has emerged during the year 2008 has comprised a catalogue of many famously epic fails. Consisting of images and videos of many bloopers, blunders and crazy pranks, fail funnies fail blog is considered one of the primary authorities for everything fail. Other fail blogs that are considered originators and certified fail sites are Shipment Of Fail.com in addition to Fail Blog.org.
1935:
1656:
1615:
1839:
For the types of failure it is easy to contribute more and start to categorize the types of failure and include examples. Types of failures While failure is based on an individual or belief system there are types of failures that can be categorized such as: Predicted
Failure: Failing that helps one
1425:
This image and caption is the most dead-pan hilarious thing on the entire site. They must stay. (Incidentally, the idea that the "Fail" meme falls below the notability threshold is completely ridiculous. Do we really want to completely rule out our ability to document internet culture as it develops?
1900:
The internet meme section, in my opinion, kind of loses focus from the article in y opinion. i think there is more focus on the internet meme than how it is an exxmple of the consequence of failure. I think the portion that is below should be removed since it focuses more on the failboat and not the
622:
I think its hysterical George W. Bush was coming up with people put "failure" into google. It was some kind of glitch somebody had programmed. I remember reading an article about it on the internet. There are several other words that give similar, unexpected results, like "via retardo" gives you the
486:
Many people have been offended and delighted by what seems like a politically slanted result on Google. The truth is that when you type in the word "failure" on the search bar for Google, George W. Bush's biography is the first result. To clear you mind and hear the facts on this matter, there is an
174:
Many people have been offended and delighted by what seems like a politically slanted result on Google. The truth is that when you type in the word "failure" on the search bar for Google, George W. Bush's biography is the first result. To clear you mind and hear the facts on this matter, there is an
412:
This actually is a collection of definitions, and a useful jump-point to several other wikipedia articles. The
Wiktionary article on failure lists none of the information in this article and, by design, should not. That this article describes a somewhat abstract concept, and may not conform to your
280:
This actually is a collection of definitions, and a useful jump-point to several other wikipedia articles. The
Wiktionary article on failure lists none of the information in this article and, by design, should not. That this article describes a somewhat abstract concept, and may not conform to your
705:
The (incorrect) spelling "phail" is only used in the internet as a popular, but (usually) subtle meme, but placing it in a professional source such as
Knowledge as an "alternative spelling" is not so great for Wiki's reputation as a reliable source. This spelling should be included in the "popular
316:
While there is no question that the Bush presidency is the foremost example of failure in living memory, there have been other failures. Google-searching for "failure" or "miserable failure" (my personal favorite) suggests that this opinion of Bush is widely held. But seriously, Knowledge is not a
156:
This page looks like it might be about engineering failure, indeed it is linked from other subjects on reliability, but it also contains some other concepts like failure as the opposite of success (e.g. failure to win a sporting tournament). It seems to me this page needs to be split into several
1448:
I think you misunderstand the purpose of an encyclopedia. Knowledge and ED have different goals. If a meme never raises to the level where it's documented in a reliable secondary source then it's a "flash in the pan" fad and outside of an encyclopedia's scope. ED doesn't care about notability.
820:
What is the term for intentional failure of a product in order to decrease supply? Is there a distinct governmental, political, or anarchist term for perpetualizing a problem through intentional failure by an institution, e.g. the failure of the "war on drugs" to seize or hinder major sources of
1292:
A classic example - how can one define "failure" versus "degradation"? Example: A car loses all hydraulic braking. Is that a failure, or simply degradation? One can still stop the car by the parking brake, downshifting, or coasting. Extend it further - one loses all Anti-Lock braking.
646:
I agree, this is highly misleading to the average FAIL. Many people go to
Knowledge for facts, and they take these facts very seriously. some one could get FAILed because they FAILed fail "phail" and were put back in FAILed grade. There is no citation for that false FAILing, and is technically
602:
As someone who knows the person involved with creation of this particular google algorithm, you will notice that it was starting to be phased back. Google finally fixed the problem last July. Since then, the propogation started migrating naturally to wikipedia. Good thing, too, otherwise the
1207:
There needs to be some mention of "social failure". There is reference for this I note the movie "Loser" staring that guy "from
American Pie". Failure need not be viwed in terms of engineering alone, it covers many topic sub types, but I believe one of the main sub types of failure is an
124:
A recent (Aug 2006) Google search for "failure" placed George W. Bush first, with a link to www.whitehouse.gov. Interestingly, the second-highest hit was for Jimmy Carter on the same site. Neither page actually contains the word "failure", of course. Obviously this is just the result of
732:
I tried to remove this earlier and it was restored. No one who is trying to be serious uses "phail". It's part of an internet meme. It's identical to adding a dictionary entry for the verb "to have" that says the third person singular is colloquially spelled
357:
This article, as it stands, is just a random mish-mash of different thoughts. Even setting aside that it is poorly written and not complete in any rational sense, it really is unclear how this could become a real article in and of itself. The term
74:
does anyone know the 'failure' phenomenon of google. it pulls up a political personality. who came up with this scheme in google? what other words are there like this? what is the history of personalities featured? does anyone have anything to
1029:
Failblog was the originator of the more recent colloquial usage, working technically along the same lines of captioning found material on the internet, such as the De-motivational, I Canhazcheezeburger, and numerous
Goonsquad competitions.
1139:
In conjunction with the failblog, the below website is another outstanding collection of fail in the internets newest fail phenomenon. I belive that it should be added as well, since it also is another presentation of fail.
1502:
Failure is an abstract noun and doesn't need an encyclopedia entry. There are those who go about mercilessly deleting spurious
Knowledge pages, and I think they should check this one out. Deletionists, where are you now?
263:
Failure is an abstract noun and doesn't need an encyclopedia entry. There are those who go about mercilessly deleting spurious Knowledge pages, and I think they should check this one out. Deletionists, where are you now?
413:
imagined structure of a wikipedia article, does not automatically make it a candidate for deletion. I believe it has enough valuable information, including links to related articles, that it should be preserved.
281:
imagined structure of a wikipedia article, does not automatically make it a candidate for deletion. I believe it has enough valuable information, including links to related articles, that it should be preserved.
1548:
I am unable to edit this page, so I beg someone who can to remove the "List of Military failures" from the other failures list. It is politically biased to use that as an example and therefore innappropriate
1714:
Failure or to fail is simply the outcome of not getting something right the first time. Failure gives you the opportunity to do better the next time you try. It allows you to improve the situation. Rhouder
1230:
This "loser" definition does not fit with the article. Further, there is another definition of failure - "failure to recognize failure", that is continuence of policies that promote continued non-success.--
1449:
In-fact, it's completely the opposite. They love to hop on new or obscure memes and document them. So yes, if ED does their job right, we will always be scooped by them. And that's how it should be. -----
623:
office of the mayor of Los Angeles. It appears the GWB result no longer comes up -- the wikipedia article is now the first result to come up. Now... why the hell isn't this mentioned in the article? --
1188:
This article needs to be totally revamped. It needs to be unprotected as a result. However, I would like to request some ideas from the readership on how to outline the concept of Failure. --
1966:
890:
Images started appearing online in the early part of 2007 and a series of them where passed around social networks and blogs. This is a collection (adver free) of images collected so far.
260:
Wiktionary is for word definitions. I can't see anything in this article (or imagine anything new added to it) that would turn it into a wikipedia article on a person, place, or thing.
798:
I agree. Subsections with Failboat (capsizing ship) and Phail (failure due to unintentional phallic reference) need to be added. Also change the "Fail" redirect to disambiguation.
1483:
is for word definitions. I can't see anything in this article (or imagine anything new added to it) that would turn it into a wikipedia article on a person, place, or thing.
362:
covers an incredibly broad range of ideas which have very little in common except the base definition of the word. So this article can only properly become one of two things:
837:
The word would be "success". If someone completes an action as intended ("Play-acting a failure") then it is actually a success. No special word for it that I know of. -----
1534:
I disagree that this needs to be deleted - it lists some of the causes, implications and types of failure in contemporary society. Most dictionaries mention no such thing. ~
1381:
to start. If you drive a car or fly in a plane, your life depends on how it is defined, measured, and the methods used to manage failure. This is not to be trivialized. --
1813:
Failure to act Failure to do a human failure or a physical act to do nothing, or just an emotion we all have the feeling of failure we are human life wont change us
345:
Under heading "Formal technical definition", a reference is made to ISO 10303-226. However, conform the ISO TC184/SC4 committe, ISO 10303-226 has been withdrawn; see
212:
Under heading "Formal technical definition", a reference is made to ISO 10303-226. However, conform the ISO TC184/SC4 committe, ISO 10303-226 has been withdrawn; see
1071:
I wonder why a crashed train is classified as a failure. There should be something like electric circuits failure, or getting an F for a paper at school instead. --
670:
759:
I believe the earliest examples of "fail" being used on the internet in this fashion date back to postings by slashdot user "YOU FAIL IT!", as early as 2002.
380:
And, BTW, this article should not be part of WikiProject Engineering. By its name and its scope it is not primarily about the engineering concept of failure.
346:
213:
979:
Does anyone think that the colloquialism for many demotivational posters and fail memes to use "(description) fail" should be included? For example
947:
There are definitely a few other "fail blogs" out there that may be good up and comers to the dominance of failblog.org. Some good examples include
118:
Because someone who is totally oblivious to the ramifications of Jihad and only interested in self centered political pursuits made the entry!'
113:. Could someone explain why George W Bush results top from a search for the keyword 'failure', there is not even the word failure on the page.
1564:
1779:
1696:
1631:
1599:
1488:
1382:
1294:
1278:
1231:
1161:
1118:
988:
769:
539:
1820:
1799:
1716:
1215:
799:
1189:
707:
648:
1970:
1762:
1677:
906:
828:
1874:
1516:
highlights the policy and processes for nominating pages for deletion. Feel free to read through and nominate, if appropriate.
1293:
Hydraulic brakes and other methods remain viable. Please define Failure in contexts where vital capabilities still exist.--
642:
I really don't think fail is normally spelt phail, should it be moved into the section about the internet meme? -No Signature
1263:
whenever one of its vehicles fail to operate. This is presumably a position of pride that they take, that their automobiles
242:
whenever one of its vehicles fail to operate. This is presumably a position of pride that they take, that their automobiles
1459:
1407:
1096:
931:
847:
683:
580:
519:
466:
1581:
1277:
Specific reference to RR is not within wikipedia guidelines. If RR is to cited, more specific examples are required.--
984:
337:
this page failure was seriously vandalized et. when I attempted to make the changes it went back to it's orginal form
1885:
1397:
It's clear that a failure of some type took place. At the very least the wall failed to hold back the train. -----
38:
1988:
it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format.
347:
http://www.tc184-sc4.org/SC4%5FOpen/SC4%5FWork%5FProducts%5FDocuments/STEP%5F%2810303%29/200-299/documentation.cfm
214:
http://www.tc184-sc4.org/SC4%5FOpen/SC4%5FWork%5FProducts%5FDocuments/STEP%5F%2810303%29/200-299/documentation.cfm
1513:
867:. FAIL == SUCCESS. Other situations where failure is the intended consequence include, fuses and crumple zones.
1783:
1700:
1603:
1560:
1492:
1386:
1298:
1282:
1235:
1122:
1635:
1157:
992:
773:
543:
509:
A glitch in (or abuse of) Google has nothing to do with the actual concept of "failure" - so lets drop it. ---
1824:
1803:
1219:
803:
1941:
1720:
1594:. The German word "Versagen" has the same level of generality as the English "failure", whereas the article
1378:
711:
652:
1758:
1556:
1535:
1431:
1193:
1178:
1076:
1153:
964:
1332:
1317:
1312:
What does a train crash that probably killed people have to do with failure? I have hidden it for now.--
1056:
1045:
910:
628:
1072:
980:
887:
Images from the meme FAIL also some "Your doing it wrong" images which are a subset if the FAIL meme.
553:
Bush's biography and record of "success" should still be on this link, nothing could be more accurate.
1754:
1816:
1795:
1750:
1627:
1552:
1211:
1149:
902:
864:
789:
785:
784:
I'd say the meme needs a page of it's own. It seems out-of-place here, but qualifies as significant.
765:
608:
604:
535:
960:
499:
whilst this is very entertaining, the fact doesn't really seem to me to be of merit to the article.
488:
176:
1521:
1367:
1052:
1041:
825:
1792:
Failure to act Failure to do a human failure or a physical act to do nothing, or just an emotion
734:
1993:
1916:
1908:
1853:
1845:
1504:
1350:
1014:
267:
90:
558:
331:
Why does this article not mention George Bush? He is a well-known failure, according to Google.
1737:
Watson quote requires a citation, it is "Ron van Oech (1982), A Whack on the Side of the Head"
1455:
1427:
1403:
1174:
1092:
927:
872:
843:
738:
679:
576:
515:
86:
1595:
1591:
1568:
1507:
1496:
1328:
1313:
1208:
individual's failure in the community and this should be termed social failure or similar.
624:
451:
300:
136:
However, the internet pehonomenon through which George W Bush became the top Google hit for
603:
algorithm would have targeted Barack Obama, as his IT team is now the steward of the site.
1268:
270:
247:
76:
1691:
Should the (above) tag be added? This article barely skims the superficial stuff, and: "
1517:
1363:
822:
500:
821:
illicit drugs & instead performing security theater by raiding individual homes? -
1989:
1912:
1904:
1849:
1841:
1463:
1411:
1346:
1100:
1010:
935:
851:
687:
666:
584:
523:
491:
470:
398:
367:
199:
179:
158:
1086:
How else would you classify a train crash? It's a failure in one way or another. ---
985:
http://dognpony.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/fail-owned-suicide-ad-placement-fail.jpg
1450:
1398:
1087:
922:
868:
838:
674:
571:
510:
461:
432:
414:
282:
110:
47:
17:
1033:"epic fail" seems to have been the variant that has seeped into mainstream media.
760:
570:
Exactly. And how can you say something has failed when it hasn't finished yet? ---
1693:
This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
460:
I can't find any evidence that the book realy exists... so I have removed it. ---
1245:
224:
126:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
318:
1487:
I disagree - it is vital to define failure in order to explain its meaning.--
140:
may be considered for addition to the article, or as a disambiguation topic.
1249:
1037:
1006:
228:
1997:
1974:
1920:
1857:
1828:
1807:
1787:
1766:
1724:
1704:
1639:
1607:
1540:
1525:
1468:
1435:
1416:
1390:
1371:
1354:
1336:
1321:
1302:
1286:
1271:
1239:
1223:
1197:
1182:
1165:
1126:
1105:
1080:
1060:
1020:
996:
968:
940:
914:
876:
856:
831:
807:
793:
777:
742:
715:
692:
656:
632:
612:
589:
561:
547:
503:
494:
475:
454:
435:
417:
401:
321:
303:
285:
250:
202:
182:
161:
93:
79:
1426:
Are we content to be scooped by the a**holes at Encyclopedia Dramatica? --
1778:
Anyone notice these two articles have the same image in the same place?--
1587:
987:
etc. I think this is an important evolving trend and should be mentioned.
392:
193:
129:. It should be painfully obvious, as stated above, that either person is
101:
President George W Bush of the United States is one example of a failure.
1945:
1002:
106:
665:
I added the modifier "colloquially" since thats what those are. See
144:
Without a doubt George W. Bush as a failure is a disambiguation topic.
391:
I added a translation at pt.wikipedia.org. Can an Administrator add "
334:
I think people vandalise this article because you don't mention him.
192:
I added a translation at pt.wikipedia.org. Can an Administrator add "
981:
http://failblog.files.wordpress.com/2008/07/fail-owned-exit-fail.jpg
647:
considered vandalism. It would be nice if someone could FAIL that.-
341:
Reference to ISO 10303-226: this standard has been withdrawn by ISO
208:
Reference to ISO 10303-226: this standard has been withdrawn by ISO
1675:
parameter to this template to explain the issue with the article.
373:
A disambiguation page pointing to articles about concrete topics.
1929:
1649:
893:
25:
1741:
1327:
Also how does failure have anything to do with engineering?--
1143:
956:
706:
culture" tab. "fail" and "flop," however, can remain there.-
1267:
break down. Should this use be included in the article? -
952:
246:
break down. Should this use be included in the article? -
377:
The latter, of course, is the only one that makes sense.
450:(Lansdowne)—can someone supply the source or the ISBN?
428:
299:(Lansdowne)—can someone supply the source or the ISBN?
948:
921:
Any third-party citations in notable publications? ---
557:
Knowledge is not the place for political propaganda -
446:
I can not find the book, the author, or the publisher
295:
I can not find the book, the author, or the publisher
1479:
This is not an encyclopedia entry, it's a definition
1173:
That is complete advertisement, it won't be added.--
256:
This is not an encyclopedia entry, it's a definition
1926:Semi-protected edit request on 30 August 2016
1665:needs attention from an expert in engineering
8:
532:Democrats Failure to have any brain cells.
1624:i agree fail means u have lost something
133:an appropriate example for this article.
1742:http://en.wikiquote.org/Thomas_J._Watson
863:I think the term you are thinking of is
1867:
1774:Error & Failure Knowledge articles
1680:may be able to help recruit an expert.
349:. I suggest to remove this reference.
216:. I suggest to remove this reference.
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
1967:2601:282:A00:8C90:C92E:146B:6099:D6C0
1362:Well it certainly wasn't a success.--
673:, so I guess it's used out there. ---
7:
1598:is specific to failures in traffic.
1911:) 18:32, 7 April 2016 (UTC)karce906
1848:) 18:21, 7 April 2016 (UTC)karce906
366:A dictionary entry, which violates
487:article on Google concerning it.
175:article on Google concerning it.
24:
109:and is inappropriate in a proper
1980:
1933:
1654:
1613:
883:FAIL Images - Meme - Fail Blog.
29:
1478:
455:01:56, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
304:01:56, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
1:
1725:12:56, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
1508:20:10, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
1061:19:46, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
1051:19:40, 13 December 2010 (gmt)
1021:16:07, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
997:03:41, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
969:14:38, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
877:18:41, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
857:04:13, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
716:18:50, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
693:18:22, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
669:. "phail" gets about 400,000
657:18:04, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
418:12:24, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
286:12:24, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
271:20:10, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
94:04:14, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
80:02:40, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
1788:20:11, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
1767:08:53, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
1734:(editing disabled for page)
1569:22:48, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
1469:21:17, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
1224:11:41, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
816:Term for intentional failure
762:This is original research.
743:22:56, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
613:05:28, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
548:19:58, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
495:16:44, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
436:21:07, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
322:18:59, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
255:
183:16:44, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
1998:21:45, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
1975:21:39, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
1960:to reactivate your request.
1948:has been answered. Set the
1829:23:08, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
1808:23:05, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
1436:07:15, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
1417:21:34, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
1372:16:55, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
1272:21:16, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
590:12:26, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
562:17:26, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
251:21:16, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
152:Page content seems confused
105:This phrase constitutes an
2014:
1835:Adding to types of failure
1705:09:33, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
1640:11:36, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
1541:17:17, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
1526:10:40, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
1198:01:07, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
1183:16:22, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
1166:01:38, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
1117:yah, high-speed fail. LOL
957:http://englishfailblog.com
941:16:32, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
915:03:32, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
832:22:03, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
778:10:13, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
528:20:29, 28 July 2007 (UTCld
1921:18:32, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
1858:18:21, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
1608:16:57, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
1514:Knowledge:Deletion policy
1337:14:11, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
1322:14:09, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
1127:20:55, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
808:15:12, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
504:12:17, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
476:20:32, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
408:Collection of definitions
353:Restructure and break out
276:Collection of definitions
1575:Link to German Knowledge
1497:01:32, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
1391:01:44, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
1355:20:04, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
1303:01:30, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
1287:01:40, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
1240:01:38, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
1106:02:37, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
1081:19:03, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
953:http://dailyfailblog.com
633:06:23, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
402:21:24, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
203:21:24, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
162:12:46, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
1678:WikiProject Engineering
1379:reliability engineering
794:04:33, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
638:Is fail spelt that way?
975:Internet Meme section
157:disambiguated pages.
42:of past discussions.
1253:"failure to proceed"
865:Planned obsolescence
232:"failure to proceed"
1730:Citation for Watson
1582:edit semi-protected
949:http://epicfail.com
755:Origins of the Meme
482:"Failure" on Google
170:"Failure" on Google
1887:, additional text.
1876:, additional text.
1596:de:Betriebsstörung
1592:de:Betriebsstörung
1203:Defining "Failure"
1964:
1963:
1819:comment added by
1798:comment added by
1770:
1753:comment added by
1686:
1685:
1630:comment added by
1571:
1555:comment added by
1467:
1415:
1214:comment added by
1169:
1152:comment added by
1104:
939:
917:
905:comment added by
855:
768:comment added by
691:
588:
550:
538:comment added by
527:
474:
448:BOOM, BUST, BANG!
297:BOOM, BUST, BANG!
87:miserable failure
67:
66:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
2005:
1984:
1983:
1955:
1951:
1937:
1936:
1930:
1888:
1883:
1877:
1872:
1831:
1810:
1769:
1747:
1681:
1667:. Please add a
1658:
1657:
1650:
1642:
1617:
1616:
1585:
1550:
1538:
1453:
1401:
1226:
1168:
1146:
1135:Add another link
1111:yea boi i agree
1090:
1048:
1017:
925:
900:
894:Fail Funnies.com
841:
780:
677:
574:
533:
513:
464:
63:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
2013:
2012:
2008:
2007:
2006:
2004:
2003:
2002:
1981:
1953:
1949:
1934:
1928:
1923:
1898:
1893:
1892:
1891:
1884:
1880:
1873:
1869:
1837:
1814:
1793:
1776:
1748:
1732:
1712:
1682:
1676:
1659:
1655:
1648:
1625:
1614:
1586:Please link to
1579:
1577:
1557:Sauron is black
1536:
1481:
1310:
1209:
1205:
1147:
1137:
1069:
1050:
1046:
1019:
1015:
977:
959:to name a few.
885:
818:
763:
757:
640:
484:
444:
425:
410:
404:August 08 2007
389:
355:
343:
329:
314:
293:
278:
258:
222:
210:
190:
172:
154:
134:
77:laurens.whipple
72:
59:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2011:
2009:
2001:
2000:
1962:
1961:
1938:
1927:
1924:
1903:
1897:
1896:Internet Memes
1894:
1890:
1889:
1878:
1866:
1865:
1861:
1836:
1833:
1780:78.156.109.166
1775:
1772:
1746:Erik Steiner
1731:
1728:
1711:
1708:
1697:184.76.225.106
1688:
1684:
1683:
1662:
1660:
1653:
1647:
1646:Expert needed?
1644:
1632:175.140.233.23
1622:
1621:
1600:130.83.244.131
1576:
1573:
1546:
1545:
1544:
1543:
1529:
1528:
1505:Steve Rapaport
1500:
1499:
1489:96.244.247.130
1480:
1477:
1476:
1475:
1474:
1473:
1472:
1471:
1441:
1440:
1439:
1438:
1420:
1419:
1394:
1393:
1383:96.244.247.130
1360:
1359:
1358:
1357:
1340:
1339:
1309:
1306:
1295:96.244.247.130
1290:
1289:
1279:96.244.247.130
1259:) in place of
1243:
1242:
1232:96.244.247.130
1204:
1201:
1186:
1185:
1154:Madstockbroker
1136:
1133:
1132:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1119:198.151.130.69
1109:
1108:
1068:
1065:
1064:
1063:
1044:
1024:
1023:
1013:
989:124.169.67.104
976:
973:
972:
971:
944:
943:
884:
881:
880:
879:
860:
859:
817:
814:
813:
812:
811:
810:
770:124.168.52.162
756:
753:
752:
751:
750:
749:
748:
747:
746:
745:
723:
722:
721:
720:
719:
718:
698:
697:
696:
695:
671:hits on google
660:
659:
639:
636:
620:
619:
618:
617:
616:
615:
595:
594:
593:
592:
565:
564:
540:12.145.170.131
530:
529:
483:
480:
479:
478:
443:
440:
439:
438:
424:
421:
409:
406:
388:
385:
375:
374:
371:
354:
351:
342:
339:
328:
325:
313:
310:
308:
292:
289:
277:
274:
268:Steve Rapaport
257:
254:
238:) in place of
221:
220:Other Failures
218:
209:
206:
189:
186:
171:
168:
166:
153:
150:
148:
127:Google bombing
123:
116:
99:
97:
96:
71:
68:
65:
64:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2010:
1999:
1995:
1991:
1987:
1979:
1978:
1977:
1976:
1972:
1968:
1959:
1956:parameter to
1947:
1943:
1939:
1932:
1931:
1925:
1922:
1918:
1914:
1910:
1906:
1902:
1895:
1886:
1882:
1879:
1875:
1871:
1868:
1864:
1860:
1859:
1855:
1851:
1847:
1843:
1834:
1832:
1830:
1826:
1822:
1821:86.45.106.152
1818:
1811:
1809:
1805:
1801:
1800:86.45.106.152
1797:
1790:
1789:
1785:
1781:
1773:
1771:
1768:
1764:
1760:
1756:
1752:
1744:
1743:
1738:
1735:
1729:
1727:
1726:
1722:
1718:
1717:152.106.99.20
1709:
1707:
1706:
1702:
1698:
1694:
1689:
1679:
1674:
1670:
1666:
1663:This article
1661:
1652:
1651:
1645:
1643:
1641:
1637:
1633:
1629:
1620:
1612:
1611:
1610:
1609:
1605:
1601:
1597:
1593:
1589:
1583:
1574:
1572:
1570:
1566:
1562:
1558:
1554:
1542:
1539:
1533:
1532:
1531:
1530:
1527:
1523:
1519:
1515:
1512:
1511:
1510:
1509:
1506:
1498:
1494:
1490:
1486:
1485:
1484:
1470:
1465:
1461:
1457:
1452:
1447:
1446:
1445:
1444:
1443:
1442:
1437:
1433:
1429:
1424:
1423:
1422:
1421:
1418:
1413:
1409:
1405:
1400:
1396:
1395:
1392:
1388:
1384:
1380:
1376:
1375:
1374:
1373:
1369:
1365:
1356:
1352:
1348:
1344:
1343:
1342:
1341:
1338:
1334:
1330:
1326:
1325:
1324:
1323:
1319:
1315:
1307:
1305:
1304:
1300:
1296:
1288:
1284:
1280:
1276:
1275:
1274:
1273:
1270:
1266:
1262:
1258:
1254:
1251:
1247:
1241:
1237:
1233:
1229:
1228:
1227:
1225:
1221:
1217:
1216:118.209.69.81
1213:
1202:
1200:
1199:
1195:
1191:
1184:
1180:
1176:
1172:
1171:
1170:
1167:
1163:
1159:
1155:
1151:
1145:
1141:
1134:
1128:
1124:
1120:
1116:
1115:
1114:
1113:
1112:
1107:
1102:
1098:
1094:
1089:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1082:
1078:
1074:
1066:
1062:
1058:
1054:
1049:
1043:
1039:
1036:
1035:
1034:
1031:
1027:
1022:
1018:
1012:
1008:
1004:
1001:
1000:
999:
998:
994:
990:
986:
982:
974:
970:
966:
962:
958:
954:
950:
946:
945:
942:
937:
933:
929:
924:
920:
919:
918:
916:
912:
908:
904:
897:
895:
891:
888:
882:
878:
874:
870:
866:
862:
861:
858:
853:
849:
845:
840:
836:
835:
834:
833:
830:
827:
824:
815:
809:
805:
801:
800:129.252.22.40
797:
796:
795:
791:
787:
783:
782:
781:
779:
775:
771:
767:
761:
754:
744:
740:
736:
731:
730:
729:
728:
727:
726:
725:
724:
717:
713:
709:
704:
703:
702:
701:
700:
699:
694:
689:
685:
681:
676:
672:
668:
667:Colloquialism
664:
663:
662:
661:
658:
654:
650:
645:
644:
643:
637:
635:
634:
630:
626:
614:
610:
606:
601:
600:
599:
598:
597:
596:
591:
586:
582:
578:
573:
569:
568:
567:
566:
563:
560:
556:
555:
554:
551:
549:
545:
541:
537:
525:
521:
517:
512:
508:
507:
506:
505:
502:
497:
496:
493:
489:
481:
477:
472:
468:
463:
459:
458:
457:
456:
453:
449:
441:
437:
434:
430:
427:
426:
422:
420:
419:
416:
407:
405:
403:
400:
396:
394:
387:Version added
386:
384:
381:
378:
372:
369:
365:
364:
363:
361:
352:
350:
348:
340:
338:
335:
332:
326:
324:
323:
320:
311:
309:
306:
305:
302:
298:
290:
288:
287:
284:
275:
273:
272:
269:
265:
261:
253:
252:
249:
245:
241:
237:
233:
230:
226:
219:
217:
215:
207:
205:
204:
201:
197:
195:
188:Version added
187:
185:
184:
181:
177:
169:
167:
164:
163:
160:
151:
149:
146:
145:
141:
139:
132:
128:
122:
121:
119:
114:
112:
108:
103:
102:
95:
92:
91:BenFrantzDale
88:
84:
83:
82:
81:
78:
75:contribute?--
69:
62:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
1985:
1965:
1957:
1942:edit request
1899:
1881:
1870:
1862:
1838:
1815:— Preceding
1812:
1794:— Preceding
1791:
1777:
1749:— Preceding
1745:
1739:
1736:
1733:
1713:
1692:
1690:
1687:
1672:
1668:
1664:
1626:— Preceding
1623:
1618:
1578:
1547:
1501:
1482:
1428:Peter Farago
1361:
1311:
1291:
1264:
1260:
1256:
1252:
1244:
1206:
1190:74.107.74.39
1187:
1175:Megaman en m
1144:Fail Funnies
1142:
1138:
1110:
1073:TylerDurdenn
1070:
1032:
1028:
1025:
978:
898:
892:
889:
886:
819:
758:
708:64.91.158.52
649:64.91.158.52
641:
621:
552:
531:
498:
485:
447:
445:
411:
397:
390:
382:
379:
376:
359:
356:
344:
336:
333:
330:
327:George Bush.
315:
307:
296:
294:
279:
266:
262:
259:
243:
239:
235:
231:
223:
211:
198:
191:
173:
165:
155:
147:
143:
142:
137:
135:
130:
120:
117:
115:
111:Encyclopedia
104:
100:
98:
73:
60:
43:
37:
18:Talk:Failure
1755:ErikSteiner
1590:instead of
1588:de:Versagen
1551:—Preceding
1329:gordonrox24
1314:gordonrox24
1261:"breakdown"
1246:Rolls-Royce
1210:—Preceding
1148:—Preceding
1005:? See also
907:87.69.4.187
901:—Preceding
764:—Preceding
625:Ragemanchoo
534:—Preceding
452:DocWatson42
395:"? Thanks!
393:pt:Fracasso
312:George Bush
301:DocWatson42
240:"breakdown"
225:Rolls-Royce
196:"? Thanks!
194:pt:Fracasso
36:This is an
1950:|answered=
1863:References
1695:" ~Eric F
1269:Loadmaster
786:Smithereen
605:Mastercare
248:Loadmaster
1986:Not done:
1518:Jimjamjak
1364:Nacnud298
1345:facepalm.
1250:euphemism
1248:uses the
1038:Epic Fail
1007:Fail Blog
961:Duanehaas
823:Erudecorp
501:Andyroo g
442:Reference
429:Archive 1
291:Reference
229:euphemism
227:uses the
61:Archive 1
1990:Cannolis
1913:Karce906
1905:Karce906
1850:Karce906
1842:Karce906
1817:unsigned
1796:unsigned
1763:contribs
1751:unsigned
1628:unsigned
1565:contribs
1553:unsigned
1347:Thakmere
1212:unsigned
1162:contribs
1150:unsigned
1053:EvileDik
1042:EvileDik
1011:Rehevkor
903:unsigned
766:unsigned
536:unsigned
492:Mbobanda
423:Untitled
399:Al Lemos
200:Al Lemos
180:Mbobanda
159:Sangwine
1946:Failure
1715:Mongalo
1710:Failure
869:Saayiit
735:AggroSA
415:Gladmax
360:failure
283:Gladmax
138:failure
107:opinion
39:archive
1669:reason
1308:Image.
955:, and
733:"haz".
368:WP:NAD
317:list.
1954:|ans=
1940:This
1671:or a
1265:never
1003:It is
899:No.
559:Jaqel
383:--MC
319:Twang
244:never
16:<
1994:talk
1971:talk
1917:talk
1909:talk
1854:talk
1846:talk
1825:talk
1804:talk
1784:talk
1759:talk
1740:See
1721:talk
1701:talk
1673:talk
1636:talk
1619:Done
1604:talk
1561:talk
1522:talk
1493:talk
1432:talk
1387:talk
1377:See
1368:talk
1351:talk
1333:talk
1318:talk
1299:talk
1283:talk
1255:(or
1236:talk
1220:talk
1194:talk
1179:talk
1158:talk
1123:talk
1077:talk
1067:Fail
1057:talk
1040:? .
993:talk
983:and
965:talk
911:talk
873:talk
804:talk
790:talk
774:talk
739:talk
712:talk
653:talk
629:talk
609:talk
544:talk
370:, or
234:(or
85:See
70:Talk
1952:or
1944:to
1537:AH1
1464:WRE
1451:J.S
1412:WRE
1399:J.S
1257:FTP
1101:WRE
1088:J.S
936:WRE
923:J.S
852:WRE
839:J.S
688:WRE
675:J.S
585:WRE
572:J.S
524:WRE
511:J.S
471:WRE
462:J.S
433:J.S
431:---
236:FTP
131:not
89:. —
1996:)
1973:)
1958:no
1919:)
1856:)
1827:)
1806:)
1786:)
1765:)
1761:•
1723:)
1703:)
1638:)
1606:)
1584:}}
1580:{{
1567:)
1563:•
1524:)
1495:)
1434:)
1389:)
1370:)
1353:)
1335:)
1320:)
1301:)
1285:)
1238:)
1222:)
1196:)
1181:)
1164:)
1160:•
1125:)
1079:)
1059:)
1009:.
995:)
967:)
951:,
913:)
875:)
806:)
792:)
776:)
741:)
714:)
655:)
631:)
611:)
546:)
490:--
465:(/
178:--
1992:(
1969:(
1915:(
1907:(
1852:(
1844:(
1823:(
1802:(
1782:(
1757:(
1719:(
1699:(
1634:(
1602:(
1559:(
1520:(
1491:(
1466:)
1462:/
1460:C
1458:/
1456:T
1454:(
1430:(
1414:)
1410:/
1408:C
1406:/
1404:T
1402:(
1385:(
1366:(
1349:(
1331:(
1316:(
1297:(
1281:(
1234:(
1218:(
1192:(
1177:(
1156:(
1121:(
1103:)
1099:/
1097:C
1095:/
1093:T
1091:(
1075:(
1055:(
1047:✉
1016:✉
991:(
963:(
938:)
934:/
932:C
930:/
928:T
926:(
909:(
871:(
854:)
850:/
848:C
846:/
844:T
842:(
829:*
826:?
802:(
788:(
772:(
737:(
710:(
690:)
686:/
684:C
682:/
680:T
678:(
651:(
627:(
607:(
587:)
583:/
581:C
579:/
577:T
575:(
542:(
526:)
522:/
520:C
518:/
516:T
514:(
473:)
469:/
467:C
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.