Knowledge (XXG)

< User talk:Cyfraw

---

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

→

Archive 10

Hi there! I thought you might be interested in the WikiProject Images and Media's January 2012 Moving files to commons drive. We'll be trying to reduce the backlog size by over 2,000 files so we need your help! Hard-working participants in the drive will receive awards for their contributions! If you have a spare moment, please join and move a file or two, or tell other users. Thanks so much! Note: The drive officially starts in 12 years ago, but you can sign up now!

You got this message since you added yourself to the last time or is a member that stated yourself for moving files or related help. If you do not want notification for a future drive, please add yourself to this list.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Images and Media at 00:03, 15 October 2011 (UTC).

I see you have added the necessary internal hyperlinks to 109 Sqn SAAF. I have been churning our articles on the disbanded squadrons of the SAAF, with particular reference to the WW2 era. It would be super if you could do the same for the other Sqn's as what you did for 109 Sqn. My intention was to come back and re-visit the articles from the perspective of links, but I fear that's not happening!

However, I do not think its necessary to link all dates in the article - simply results in too many links on the page!

Rgds. Farawayman (talk) 06:28, 1 October 2011 (UTC) 06:27, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks --Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 12:31, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

We are on this year's home straight, with less than a month to go until the winner of the 2011 WikiCup will be decided. The fight for first place is currently being contested by Miyagawa (submissions), Hurricanehink (submissions) and Sp33dyphil (submissions), all of whom have over 200 points. This round has already seen multiple featured articles (1991 Atlantic hurricane season from Hurricanehink and Northrop YF-23 from Sp33dyphil) and a double-scoring featured list (Miyagawa's 1948 Summer Olympics medal table). The scores will likely increase far further before the end of the round on October 31 as everyone ups their pace. There is not much more to say- thoughts about next year's competition are welcome on the WikiCup talk page or the scoring talk page, and signups will open once a few things have been sorted out.

If you are concerned that your nomination, be it at good article candidates, a featured process or anywhere else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Knowledge (XXG):WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Knowledge (XXG):WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 12:41, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

So, on your alternate account's talk page, there is a tag claiming that you understand what alternate accounts are for and will abide by policy. Are you quite certain you understand WP:SOCK? Sending your alt account a welcome message and then using another account to give yourself an apparently completely undeserved barnstar strongly suggests that you do not. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:36, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Yes, I understand with the policy. --Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 16:29, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account! --Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 14:55, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Licorice is not made of rat's blood. Someone added that to the Licorice page. I undid that. You undid my undo, saying it wasn't constructive. But I just wanted to point out that licorice is not, in fact, made of rat's blood. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.116.88.129 (talk) 01:20, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

		The Modest Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to Katarighe for copy editing articles totalling over 4000 words during the GOCE September copy edit drive. Thank you for participating! Dianna (talk) 04:52, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

hey. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.7.145.224 (talk) 10:39, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Hi, I have sent you an email on authentic information on Bengali Movies. Please have a look!

Thank You! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ratul Indian (talk • contribs) 20:40, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with Knowledge (XXG). Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.

Its just a notice of BLP. No need to worry --Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 20:22, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

As I said in my previous message, I tried all the tutorials and samples and instructions, and none of my pictures, references, links to websites, magazine publishers, etc. uploaded or added to my article. Can't I just send them to you to add ??

````

Russell E Sampson Jr. (talk) 5:17PM EST September 8, 2015 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eisbar1 (talk • contribs) 21:17, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Yes you can --Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 21:22, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

- for the barnstar. I'm very happy that you took my comments in good faith, and don't hesitate to ask me if you need help with anything  :) Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 23:37, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Thank you again, but im trying some good skills for myself. I really know what mistakes I did. In the next several months, i may be improving but im not sure. Thanks --Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 23:39, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Here is a partial list that I believe should be more than sufficient:

http://www.muscleandstrength.com/articles/fitness-magazine-model-matus-valent-interview.html http://www.obiobadike.com/2010/01/obadike-writes-feature-on-top-fitness-model-matus-valent-in-Physique-magazine-jan-2010-issue/ www.modelmayem.com/19680 http://issuu.com/ironpinoy/docs/ipmag2011march.magcloud www.body.se www.muscle-fitness.sk http;//modelworldtour.com/articles.htm covermenmag.com/valent/photos/index.html www.fitnessrxformen.com www.olympian.it http://fitness.people.marketplace.com/fitness/?p=32 www.simplyshredded.com/shredded-matus-valent-talks-with-simplyshredded.com-2.html bigdonsboys.com/bodybuilders/matus-valent/ bodyspace.bodybuilding.com/MatusV

Thanks, Russell — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eisbar1 (talk • contribs) 01:14, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Sorry I forgot to sign it properly

````Russell Sampson (Talk) 9:22PM EST, 8 September 2011 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eisbar1 (talk • contribs) 01:23, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Kweku Adoboli in court.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 05:01, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Dear Katarighe,

Were you asking if there were more relevant sources than The New York Times, USA Today, Los Angeles Times, and Miami Herald? I'm not following? Would these not be the best possible sources that exist? If you can edit this it would be much appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Creed81 (talk • contribs) 18:55, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Use more relavent sources such as books and newspapers and sometimes websites. Thanks --Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 19:30, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

So where is my article ?? I sent you all the references and back up you requested. Why was it deleted ????

```` Russell Sampson (talk) 3:46 PM EST, September 9, 2011 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eisbar1 (talk • contribs) 19:47, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

It was speedy deleted requested by someone. Contact here and the deleted admin. Thanks --Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 19:51, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:107.0.140.179

Hi, I am confused as to why my edit was reverted. I changed a factual inaccuracy so it would be up to date. The "5 million people" was based on the notion that every video view is equal to one person viewing it. Either way, Harvard Sailing Team's videos have since surpassed 5 million views and are upwards of 8 million views now. You can confirm this on http://www.youtube.com/hstsketchcomedy Thank you.

This user has asked for Wikipedians to give him feedback at an editor review. You may comment on his or her edits at Knowledge (XXG):Editor review/Levonscott.

Levonscott User talk:Levonscott User:Levonscott 08:27, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in my request for adminship. Now I've got lots of extra buttons to try and avoid pressing by mistake... Redrose64 (talk) 15:07, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

Hello Redrose64! Since you are an admin now and a person closes as sucessful, you don't need autopatrolled, rollback and revewier userboxes. You just the admin userbox identifying you have admin rights. These three are automaticlly granted together as your admin package. Thanks! Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 21:00, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

Thank you, yes; I shall tidy up the user page one day... --Redrose64 (talk) 08:48, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for making a report on Knowledge (XXG):Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Knowledge (XXG) and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, it appears that the editor you reported may not have engaged in vandalism, or the user was not sufficiently or appropriately warned. Please note there is a difference between vandalism and unhelpful or misguided edits made in good faith. If the user continues to vandalise after a recent final warning, please re-report it. Thank you. The user in question had only one edit. There is no reasonable way to determine if an account is VOA just by that. Alexandria (Ni!) 15:39, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ 15:54, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

You were involved in cleaning up Azad888's images over at Commons which were suspected to be copyright violations. Some of them still exist: File:Sindhi Couple.jpg, File:Pashtun Couple.jpg and File:Punjabi Couple.jpg. I'm not active at Commons; would you please look into them? Thanks, Huon (talk) 00:38, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Mostly were copied from his websites, he must give a spepic source and these photos are not acceptable here. It most be verifyied properly or he can upload here instead. Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 01:19, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Mohammed Bensakhria at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Soman (talk) 09:23, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Hello. It appears that you are creating lots of categories and category talk pages. Please let me know, because I've thought about this and I still can't really see how they are useful. Thanks. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:57, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Hi,
please have a look at Knowledge (XXG):When not to link to WP:NOTNOW -- the WP:NOTNOW essay is intended for very new editors starting an RfA, not for an editor with 4000+ edits over 2.5 years like Ankitbhatt.
Cheers, Amalthea 08:19, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Hello! I noticed that you have just added article ETA (Euskadi Ta Askatasuna, the Basque nationalist and separatist organization) to Category:Government of India using HotCat. I was wondering if this could be a mistake, since I don't see any relationship between both (in particular, there is no mention of India in the article itself). Since I'm not knowledgeable in the matter, I have not removed the categorisation from the page; I leave that up to you, if you find it suitable. Thank you for looking into it.
— Wlgrin (talk) at 00:20, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

I did a mistake there, I was trying to put EU terrorist org on adding it. Sorry for the notice. --Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 00:41, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

I declined the speedy deletion of your editor review because it didn't appear to meet the criteria for speedy deletion. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 16:39, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

You can close the current review and open a new if you want to do that for whatever reason, but once other users edited that page it no longer qualified for speedy deletion per creator or user request. It is not in your userspace and five other users made substantive contributions to it. This makes it look like you are trying to hide anything you perceive as a negative comment related to you. That is not a good thing. These reviews were made in good faith in an attempt to help you. The idea is for you to learn to do better, not just to be a prep session for some future RFA. Beeblebrox (talk) 16:54, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Well, thanks. I understand the issues --Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 16:54, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for joining! I hope to see you there and at incubator! Also thanks on your quick review for my 2 editor review. ~~Ebe123~~ (+)
<sub>Contribs</sub> • 22:02, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, I have an account on Commons so I understand the copyright policy if its safe to move there but since you are a bureaucrat in incubator, I'm semi-active and I want to gain extra tools there before applying for an RfA here in 2012. Is that okay for me? --Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 22:28, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Tutorial on what? Editing on incubator or Moving images to the Commons? Anyway, I can do the 2. ~~∑be123~~ (+)
<sub>Contribs</sub> 22:42, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Is it okay for me to be an admin on incubator, since you are a bureaucrat on incubator now. --Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 22:44, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

You have to request it at I:A, but it would be good to see over 100 edits though. Right now, you have 17 (22:50, 22 October 2011 (UTC)). When you gain more experience, I would be glad to nom you. But right now, you may do some general maintenance work, nominating for deletion, helping with prefixing un-prefixed templates, and other things. ~~Ebe123~~ (+)|(+)}}
<sub>Contribs</sub> 22:50, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Like 3-4 months right? Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 23:12, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

And here again we see more unhealthy focus on gathering shiny things to mark milestones as prep work for that RFA, when, as I and others have endeavored to communicate to you, you should be more concerned with acquiring experience at actually editing Knowledge (XXG) and showing the capacity to learn from your mistakes and listen to honest, constructive criticism when it is offered. It's up to you how to proceed but when you post that RFA and it doesn't turn out the way you wanted you won't be able to say you were not warned, repeatedly, that you were adopting the wrong approach in treating adminship as a trophy. It is not a trophy. It is a set of tools that require demonstrable judgement and experience. It is not just a "level up" that you get when you collect enough tokens. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:44, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

I agree with you, and asking a bureaucrat if the user can be an sysop right away will always be denied. Always. ~~Ebe123~~ (+)
<sub>Contribs</sub> 09:41, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

No, when you think is right, request at the proper page. ~~Ebe123~~ (+)
<sub>Contribs</sub> 09:41, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks Beeblebrox for you spectacular help. You really understand about my unhealthy focus, like admin-ship is not like leveling up to collect tokens. I would really like these tools for me but I don't have the time to get them until I approach my behavior. I assume good faith on other users and have experienced for 6 months approx (some I left due to a wikibreak). You understand my enthusiasm for this but my idea is I have to wait until my mistakes is solved. I would not apply RfA because your brief explanation is good that would lead me successful . Do you seem I'm a good user? Have I been vandalizing or edit warring? Tell me the brief mistakes that I should solve but thank your for the great explanation. I really like it and you're a good user experiencing the standard offer. Again, thanks Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 16:02, 23 October 2011 (UTC) also check this for issues 1. Thanks Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 16:06, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

I haven't seen you vandalizing or edit warring. With all the editing here though you may have missed this edit in which I identified a serious problem right here on this page. Beeblebrox (talk) 16:15, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

What is it then? Is it the sock puppetry? --Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 16:17, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Not sure what you mean by asking "what is it then?" If you are looking for a single, simple answer to what you need to do to pass an RFA there isn't one. But using another account to give yourself an undeserved user award sure doesn't help. Beeblebrox (talk) 16:21, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

I've really understand my point, I will stop trying to do this. Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 16:31, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Well, we understand our points and try to stop this. No more questions, Thank you for your good notices Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 16:34, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Please don't subst a sockpuppet template or a indef-blocked template when tagging a user. Not only does it create unnessecary byte usage on the page, some templates aren't even supposed to be substed. Just use {{$1|$2}}, where $1 is the template name without the subst: at the beginning, and $2 is the parameter(s). This is much more efficient, and this also allows a mass update of the template usages with one edit. Thanks. LikeLakers2 (talk | Sign my guestbook!) 23:31, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

I thank you for your help, I will keep an eye of it. --Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 23:32, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar! Best, Albacore (talk) 01:57, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

How is this not clear? Pic of Eric Bischoff taken on October 8th in Allentown, PA by me at the Hulk Hogan & friends event. --Endlessdan (talk) 15:55, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

In the description I do specify the content owner.User:Tomtomn00/Signature

I've started a GA review of Islamabad Marriott Hotel bombing. Please see initial comments at Talk:Islamabad Marriott Hotel bombing/GA2. --Noleander (talk) 18:27, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Cyfraw/Archive 3! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

G'day from Oz; the images aren't non-free, and shortly they won't be orphaned either. I am uploading one more image, then I will add all the images I have uploaded today to the gallery on my User page; then I will add them to the appropriate articles. Kindly remove the tags from the images. Thank you YSSYguy (talk) 13:18, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D and Ian Rose look at Australian air power Op-ed: Buggie111 ruminates about WikiLife and WikiDeath

Re. Majid Jafar Photo on Wiki opage - thanks for yout feedback and I have tried adding the relevant info as requested but am a bit confused as to if i have done it correctly - according to where i took the photo it is owned by Chatham house but is in the public domain and available to be used. can you tell me the exact code i need to put in the description if i have not done it correctly? many thanks jamesmaharrison — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamesmaharrison (talk • contribs) 10:59, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

Whell thanks Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 11:01, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for declaring you help in EU-Related articles, but on your user page, you say that you have IMPROVED SIGNIFICANTLY 100 euro note and 20 euro note when you only:

• 20 euro note:
  • Changed one word in the article,
  • Said 'congrats' on the GA Review.
• 100 euro note:
  • Said 'congrats' on the GA Review.

I would propose you removing this from your User page. – Plarem 15:10, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	For the 'congrats' on the GA Review of 20 euro note and 100 euro note. That was extraordinary and never happened on any of my GA Reviews, when I was the nominator or the reviewer. – Plarem 15:17, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

Invitation from the Guild of Copy Editors The Guild of Copy Editors invites you to participate in their November 2011 Backlog elimination drive, a month-long effort to reduce the size of the copy edit backlog. The drive begins on November 1 at 00:00 (UTC) and ends on November 30 at 23:59 (UTC). We will be tracking the number of 2010 articles (and specifically will be targeting the oldest three months), as we want to copy edit as many of these as possible. Barnstars will be awarded to anyone who copy edits more than 4,000 words, and special awards will be given to the top 5 in the following categories: "Number of articles", "Number of words", and "Number of articles of over 5,000 words". We hope to see you there! – Your drive coordinators: Diannaa, Chaosdruid, The Utahraptor, Slon02, and SMasters. >>> Sign up now <<<

Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 01:27, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

Hello Katarighe, I noticed you'd started to leave a note for me then removed it, but in case you still had a question about that, it is not possible to reattribute edits made while logged out to an account. There's no technical means to do so. Sorry. Hersfold 17:16, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

 Done -- Well, then I will see. --Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 17:17, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

You're right about the image. If you can delete it or get someone to delete it, please do so and I will re-upload it with a description and a valid licence. --Alexcoldcasefan (talk) 17:48, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

Wilhelmina Will has given you some caramel and a candy apple! Caramel and candy-coated apples are fun Halloween treats, and promote WikiLove on Halloween. Hopefully these have made your Halloween (and the proceeding days) much sweeter. Happy Halloween! If Trick-or-treaters come your way, add {{subst:Halloween apples}} to their talkpage with a spoooooky message!

Cheers! Wilhelmina Will (talk) 05:06, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks --Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 10:37, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Vibhijain has given you some caramel and a candy apple! Caramel and candy-coated apples are fun Halloween treats, and promote WikiLove on Halloween. Hopefully these have made your Halloween (and the proceeding days) much sweeter. Happy Halloween! If Trick-or-treaters come your way, add {{subst:Halloween apples}} to their talkpage with a spoooooky message!

Plarem has given you some caramel and a candy apple! Caramel and candy-coated apples are fun Halloween treats, and promote WikiLove on Halloween. Hopefully these have made your Halloween (and the proceeding days) much sweeter. Happy Halloween! If Trick-or-treaters come your way, add {{subst:Halloween apples}} to their talkpage with a spoooooky message!

– Plarem 15:09, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

The WikiProject Formula One Newsletter Year IV · Issue 9 · September 5, 2011 – October 3, 2011 Previous month's issue
New users New members – BenChilton (talk · contribs) (September 8) Editadam (talk · contribs) (September 13) Al.locke (talk · contribs) (September 17) New recipients – Bigdon128 (talk · contribs) (October 2) New editors – WikiProject news Check out Apterygial's My Insane Idea userproject, which aims to improve the 2008 Formula One season article and that season's Grands Prix to Featured Topic status. Newsletter news	Article developments Formula One articles by quality and importance Quality Importance Top High Mid Low NA Total FA 3 3 7 13 FL 1 2 1 4 A 2 2 GA 3 6 10 6 25 B 18 30 35 47 130 C 6 28 37 79 150 Start 16 96 185 623 920 Stub 22 130 1,530 1,682 List 3 8 12 4 27 Category 380 380 Disambig 6 6 Portal 35 35 Project 67 67 Redirect 18 18 Template 149 149 NA 28 28 Assessed 50 195 419 2,289 684 3,637 Total 50 195 419 2,289 684 3,637 See also: Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Formula One/Article alerts Deletions – List of Formula One people
Editors' Comment Users are always welcome to help us with this newsletter. If you are interested, please leave a message on an existing editor's talkpage or sign up on the "Contributors" list of the central newsletter page, and we will tell you everything you need to know and answer your questions. Current contributors – Midgrid (talk · contribs) Cs-wolves (talk · contribs) Chubbennaitor (talk · contribs) How to help WPF1 – Expand the articles in Category:Formula One stubs. Read the project to-do list and help to complete the tasks: Article requests: Erich Zakowski, Daniele Coronna, Hans Fouche, Chris Radage, Giorgio Stirano, Steve Tarrant, Intertechnique, 10 Tenths, Elf Masters Copyedit: Bahrain Grand Prix, History of Formula One, Monaco Grand Prix, 2006 San Marino Grand Prix, Rob White (Formula One), Rob Smedley Expand: F1-X Dubai, Honda RA271, Paddy Lowe, Red Bull RB3, Spyker F1, Toyota TF107, BMW Sauber F1.07, Mario Theissen, Franz Tost, Chinese Grand Prix, Colin Kolles, Concorde Agreement, Formula One Constructors Association, McLaren MP4/1, Ove Andersson, Bob Bell, Korean International Circuit, Grand Prix Drivers' Association, Spyker F8-VII, Arai (company), Shoei, Schuberth Helme GmbH, Bell Racing Company, Jim Bamber, Nazir Hoosein, Formula One video games, Make Cars Green, Jonathan Legard, Michael Turner (illustrator) more Update: History of Formula One, Toyota, Robert Doornbos, Formula One regulations, 2024 Formula One season, Scuderia Toro Rosso, Super Aguri F1, Divina Galica, Grand Prix World Championship Images needed: Max Mosley, Sakon Yamamoto, Jordan Grand Prix circa 1992-1997, Paddy Lowe, 2008 Turkish Grand Prix more For more work, see this generated list or the Auxiliary list
Images Below is the F1 Picture of the month (found here). The picture has to be one uploaded in the last month and only from the current season. It is exclusive to the Newsletter. REMEMBER, YOU CAN VOTE. New images 2011
Article of the month – 2011 Italian Grand Prix The 2011 Italian Grand Prix, formally known as the 2011 Gran Premio Santander d'Italia was a Formula One motor race that was held on 11 September 2011 at the Autodromo Nazionale Monza in Italy. It was the thirteenth round of the 2011 Formula One season, and the sixtieth time the Italian Grand Prix had been held at Monza. The race, contested over 53 laps, was won by Red Bull's Sebastian Vettel, the drivers' championship leader, after starting from pole position. Jenson Button finished in second place for McLaren, and Fernando Alonso completed the podium in third position for Ferrari. As a consequence of the race, Vettel extended his lead in the World Drivers' Championship to 112 points over Alonso, who moved up to second place in the championship. Button moved into third place in the championship, five points behind Alonso, and level on points with fourth-placed Mark Webber, but ahead on countback. In the World Constructors' Championship, Red Bull's championship lead was cut by McLaren to 126 points, with Ferrari a further 71 points behind in third position. (More...)
Drivers' Championship Position Driver Team Points 1st Sebastian Vettel Red Bull 309 2nd Jenson Button McLaren 185 3rd Fernando Alonso Ferrari 184 4th Mark Webber Red Bull 182 5th Lewis Hamilton McLaren 168 6th Felipe Massa Ferrari 84 7th Nico Rosberg Mercedes GP 62 8th Michael Schumacher Mercedes GP 52 9th Vitaly Petrov Renault 34 10th Nick Heidfeld Renault 34 11th Adrian Sutil Force India 28 12th Kamui Kobayashi Sauber 27 13th Paul di Resta Force India 20 14th Jaime Alguersuari Toro Rosso 16 15th Sébastien Buemi Toro Rosso 13 16th Sergio Pérez Sauber 9 17th Rubens Barrichello Williams 4 18th Bruno Senna Renault 2 19th Pastor Maldonado Williams 1 20th Pedro de la Rosa Sauber 0 21st Jarno Trulli Lotus 0 22nd Heikki Kovalainen Lotus 0 23rd Vitantonio Liuzzi Hispania 0 24th Jérôme d'Ambrosio Virgin 0 25th Timo Glock Virgin 0 26th Narain Karthikeyan Hispania 0 27th Daniel Ricciardo Hispania 0 28th Karun Chandhok Lotus 0 Constructors' Championship Position Constructor Entered Chassis Points 1st Red Bull Racing RB7 491 2nd Vodafone McLaren Mercedes MP4-26 353 3rd Scuderia Ferrari Marlboro 150° Italia 268 4th Mercedes GP Petronas MGP W02 114 5th Lotus Renault GP R31 70 6th Force India F1 Team VJM04 48 7th Sauber F1 Team C30 36 8th Scuderia Toro Rosso STR6 29 9th AT&T Williams FW33 5 10th Team Lotus T128 0 11th Hispania Racing F1 Team F111 0 12th Marussia Virgin Racing MVR-02 0 See 2011 Formula One season for more information
Italian Grand Prix Driver Constructor Race Time 1st Sebastian Vettel Red Bull 1:20:46.172 2nd Jenson Button McLaren + 9.590 3rd Fernando Alonso Ferrari + 16.909 4th Lewis Hamilton McLaren + 17.417 5th Michael Schumacher Mercedes GP + 32.677 6th Felipe Massa Ferrari + 42.993 7th Jaime Alguersuari Toro Rosso + 1 lap 8th Paul di Resta Force India + 1 lap 9th Bruno Senna Renault + 1 lap 10th Sébastien Buemi Toro Rosso + 1 lap Fastest Lap: Lewis Hamilton 1:26.187, on lap 52 Italian Grid Line up Driver Constructor Time Row one Sebastian Vettel Red Bull 1:22.275 Lewis Hamilton McLaren 1:22.725 Row two Jenson Button McLaren 1:22.777 Fernando Alonso Ferrari 1:22.841 Row three Mark Webber Red Bull 1:22.972 Felipe Massa Ferrari 1:23.188 Row four Vitaly Petrov Renault 1:23.530 Michael Schumacher Mercedes GP 1:23.777 Row five Nico Rosberg Mercedes GP 1:24.477 Bruno Senna Renault no time* * Senna set no time in Q3, as he did not attempt a run. Friday Practice 1 – McLaren set the Monza standard Friday Practice 2 – Vettel bests Hamilton by a whisker Saturday Practice – Vettel heads Red Bull one-two Qualifying – Spectacular Vettel makes Red Bull's day in Monza Race – Vettel cruises to emphatic Monza victory
Singapore Grand Prix Driver Constructor Race Time 1st Sebastian Vettel Red Bull 1:59:06.757 2nd Jenson Button McLaren + 1.737 3rd Mark Webber Red Bull + 29.279 4th Fernando Alonso Ferrari + 55.449 5th Lewis Hamilton McLaren + 1:07.766 6th Paul di Resta Force India + 1:51.067 7th Nico Rosberg Mercedes GP + 1 lap 8th Adrian Sutil Force India + 1 lap 9th Felipe Massa Ferrari + 1 lap 10th Sergio Pérez Sauber + 1 lap Fastest Lap: Jenson Button 1:48.454, on lap 54 Singapore Grid Line up Driver Constructor Time Row one Sebastian Vettel Red Bull 1:44.381 Mark Webber Red Bull 1:44.732 Row two Jenson Button McLaren 1:44.804 Lewis Hamilton McLaren 1:44.809 Row three Fernando Alonso Ferrari 1:44.874 Felipe Massa Ferrari 1:45.800 Row four Nico Rosberg Mercedes GP 1:46.013 Michael Schumacher Mercedes GP No time* Row five Adrian Sutil Force India No time‡ Paul di Resta Force India No time‡ * Schumacher recorded no time as he did not record a flying lap in Q3. ‡ Sutil and di Resta did not leave the pits during Q3, and were ranked in car number order. First practice delayed for track repairs Friday Practice 1 – Hamilton leads shortened first session Friday Practice 2 – Red Bull ace Ferrari in Singapore Saturday Practice – Webber edges out Button Qualifying – Vettel takes dominant pole in Singapore Race – Perfect Vettel made to wait for title

This newsletter is being delivered to you because you signed up to this list. If you wish to stop receiving it, please remove your name.

• Apologies for the rather long delay in posting this issue; it appears that the bot just missed the request... Bad bot. Craig(talk) 23:03, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

→

Archive 10