User talk:Lachrie - Knowledge (XXG)

934:

nearly all the middle powers will end up as disputed—like the great powers, apart from the US—which is anyway considered a superpower, and therefore something else. We still end up with the same power relationship on the map, only with the great powers being classified as middle powers and the middle powers being classified as small powers. I suppose a shortcut would be to point out that middle powers are sometimes considered small powers by those who classify great powers as middle powers. We still end up dividing the map up between greater powers and lesser powers, in effect, between great powers and middle powers. After a lot of work, it doesn’t really move us forward, unless we restrict the map to middle powers about which there’s not that much dispute, under the modest caption of "Nations often considered middle powers". The map becomes a map of middle powers, albeit considered small powers by those who classify so-called great powers as middle powers. Then we don't have to write a separate article (at least not right away). Either that or we have a more complicated map, including the great powers, all of which but the US are disputed. And as a superpower the US isn't necessarily included among great powers anyway.

1996:

scandal. Sarah Macmillan was never a public figure, and the article isn't about her. There's no doubt about Dorothy Macmillan's extra-marital affair with Bob Boothby. We're on solid ground there, at least. The affair was hushed up and the general public were kept in the dark during HM's lifetime, but it's since become a matter of historical record. I think we should confine the coverage to the affair, without indulging a doubtful paternity rumour when we now have strong evidence to the contrary. The affair is what was most important, and its factuality is not in doubt. If necessary, we can expand on that, although the psychological interpretations are rather speculative, probably too much so to be emphasised in an encyclopaedia article like this. Davenport-Hines was heavily criticised for his attempt at posthumous second-hand psychoanalysis. The most we can say is that the affair made HM unhappy and he spent a few weeks in a sanitorium in 1931. But he wasn't even an MP at the time. The political implications of the affair are also rather doubtful: Boothby was already toxic because of the Czech scandal in 1940, long before Macmillan was in a position to influence his career.

850:

need to talk to other members on the Power in International Relations wikiproject on if we should create the article (after we get the basics done on my sandbox). Because these power articles are places for huge POV pushing by nationalists. I would consider countries like India and Brazil more along the lines of somewhere in the middle of great powers and middle powers in this day and age (but that's my opinion, not to be put in articles as Knowledge (XXG) is not what we think). However, I think that if we make the small power article, we should only mention what the academics and experts call strong small powers. As you said, most countries are probably considered small powers, and we don't want to go on and list a hundred countries. But we can talk more on this when we start working on the article. Also, I think that regional power can refer to middle, small, great/major, and superpower as it's about the region. Agree on my ideas for the small power page?

876:, otherwise people with an agenda will come along and be able to point out obvious discrepancies. Since there’s no unanimity among authorities, the map has to reflect that. The same goes for middle powers also classed by some foreign policy specialists as small powers: they should have a lighter color, too, otherwise we’re breaching NPOV by presenting a false consensus about the identification of middle powers also considered by other authorities as small powers. A little more work now means much less work later, as people will have less grounds to contest the article's claims and revert it back and forth. A small power article should be as comprehensive as any other, and any contention over membership of the small power club can be handled by citing appropriate sources, as we've done here, but we can talk about that later. 2164:, I believe the same blocked user is now trying to sneak the changes back in by falsely presenting them as a compromise by a third-party IP. In fact his edits aren't a compromise because they only retain content added by myself and others which doesn't affect his POV-pushing. The main problem is that his changes are dubious, and being so, they're inevitably unsourced. Worse, they also conflict with a preponderance of reliable sources already cited in the article. Unless he's willing to discuss his changes on the talk page or provide reliable sources substantiating them, I think they should simply be reverted as unsourced. Presumably he doesn't want to discuss the changes on the talk page because they were already rejected as dubious and unsourced when discussed originally in the 872:"Often" is more NPOV than "sometimes". "Often" is also correct. Most sources that still use old-fashioned terminology with military overtones like "Great Power" usually refer to old-fashioned institutions like the UN Security Council and its permanent members. We have to be cautious in our use of terminology. Russia is at least occasionally referred to as a great power, usually on account of its nuclear weapons, rather than its resource-based economy, which is subject to awkward fluctuations. I don’t think we have the rigorous statistical evidence to claim a significant variation in the frequency, so unfortunately we’ll have to include Russia and China on the map, or it will inevitably be open to challenge. Our criteria have to be 605:

embarrassment, but hidden from the general public until Horne published his book). Horne alludes to the obscure, much later Eton rumour, but concludes it was 'almost certainly' baseless, while Ball is actually even more critical and adduces a slanderous intent, whose agenda this encyclopedia can't be intended to advance, by repeating it, even as an extremely dubious item of childhood trivia. Cullen's book is a tertiary source written on a different subject; on Macmillan she is dependent on Ball, so her opinion, whatever it may be, must be held as less authoritative than either Ball or Horne, who both discount it.

840:

I'll have to get the map changed to include Russia and China in dark red. Plus, I don't think in the map that we need to mention that Canada and other countries are sometimes considered strong small powers. As the map is just to identify the countries (at this moment) that we have sources for that are considered middle powers, and middle/great powers. Until we decide to color in the strong small powers (though, most countries that are considered small powers are probably considered middle powers in the middle power page), we should just say small powers outside the map for now.

804:

better to respect that usage than to impose our own original interpretation on the source. If we're going to be specific about which great powers are also ranked as middle powers, we should do the same with middle powers also ranked as small powers, to be consistent, so I'm going to revert. There should be an article on small powers in which they can be included as well. Since most countries are small powers, collectively they're hardly insignificant, so it makes sense to do so. And obviously, regional power can mean either a middle power or a small power.

903:

the countries that we have listed as middle powers right now could be called by foreign policy specialists/political scientists/academics as small powers, while we have the UK, France, Russia, China, Germany, and Japan as middle/great powers. And right now, we have atleast 4 countries which could be listed as small/middle powers. So we could have the countries also listed as great power as dark red, the middle power only countries as the red now, and light red for countries described as small powers also.

1596:

spectacular. And you're not receiving the thanks and gratification you deserve from others at the article. Some post snide comments which contain unspecific "suggestions" to make the article more "neutral", such as one recently posted below yours; they do not help the article. I'd rather not get too heavily involved in the recent POV discussions (to save my blood pressure from rising, among other things), but keep up the good work and if I can be of help, please do not hesitate to let me know.

2105:

then it's more than likely a moot point, but do you think perhaps we could try and offer a compromise deal for the short term? I think we're arguably in the majority here and should be able to contain Aban if he gets a little radical as long as we work constructively to better the article. I know it's been a short time, but things have changed a bit in the 10 years since Britain, the US, Germany, France, Russia, Japan and China were the only Great Powers.

2121:

Power" is itself a rather dated term and it's unlikely one could find much support for a sudden change in the most recent IR literature. The traditional criteria are reasonably well-defined and, hype aside, the leading nations are much the same as they were a century or so ago. However, articles like this do attract nationalists, and the likelihood is that he's just a sockpuppet who will continue his disruptive behaviour until he's blocked.

1454:) 07:45, 4 July 2009 (UTC)) In my opinion historic results was pov pushing by the press and you can't say that without explaining the situation surrounding the results and the very low turnout and the fact that the tory share of the vote fell by more than labours, in europe. And the surrounding exceptional conditions, eg, the expenses scandal, a major factor in the results..it is too complex to add historic..poor is enough in the lede. ( 694:

Lordship of the Isles, the number of people who have played D&D in the Greyhawk setting and know about that Lordship of the Isles--say conservatively 10 million in the US alone--might outnumber the people who know about an ancient Scottish kingdom of the same name. Just wanted to make the point that what I think is more important because it's important to me doesn't necessarily make it more important to the majority of people.

1909:

matter, on the grounds that it at least seemed likely to be true. That can no longer be said. And the paternity rumour itself has never been the basis for a controversy in its own right. So it's hard to see how the continued inclusion of a trivial and now historically discounted rumour can be justified, short of published DNA evidence supporting something so incredible. So I'm afraid I do feel obliged to revert the change.

2137:

their edit summaries seemed to single out your edits specifically (their summary was - "but the former version had a long term consensus and the edit is a compromise because it included some of lachrie edits") - do you know if you can shed any light on why the IP would say something like that? I'd just like to try and settle things ASAP - the IP's been trying to get their preferred version across for a while now.

2160:. The IP is almost certainly the same blocked user, since he is using similar tactics to try to impose identical changes on the text. The IP's edit history shows he also has the same interest in articles on Middle Eastern politics as the blocked user. Since I was the editor who originally reverted these changes as unsourced when they were originally introduced into the Great Power article by the sockpuppet 2760: 2685: 2612: 2539: 767:

consistent as it can be. Otherwise what will happen is that some people will go hunting for the highest estimate they can in separate sources and there will be no way to compare the methodology and relative reliability of the respective sources being used for individual estimates, with the result that any comparison in the article will become much less reliable. We have to discourage original research.

1656: 788:

it's not in the great power article). Plus, there's no need to mention Canada and the other countries as small powers, as it's pretty insignificant, as that's the only article I've seen refer to them as that. Plus, there's no article on small power, nor is one needed, as they're usually refered to as regional power, middle power, great/major power, superpower, and hyperpower.

710:

Millions of Donalds and MacDonalds alone can trace their name and line to the real lordship, the largest outside royalty in the British Isles, and for centuries it played an important role in the political history of Scotland. To make the comparison is to trivialise history. Most D&D players surely would agree.

2104:

Hi again, I notice you're involved in the conversation over at Great Powers with Aban. I've been trying to talk with Aban on his talk page to try and defuse things there/find out what he's up to and he doesn't seem to have a very high opinion of any editors on the Great Powers page. If he is Chanakya

2010:

I am inclined to take the opposite view on whether the HM article should mention the paternity rumour, but rather than the two of us going on batting this to and fro, it might benefit from opening the discussion wider. I would suggest we might get more participation (and hopefully progress towards a

1845:

I considered that before I made the edit, and it's not an unreasonable suggestion, but on reflection I think that, because the gossip was inconsequential (first given publicity I think by Davenport-Hines in 1992) and the paternity rumour turns out to be false, including it only to dismiss it as false

1595:

Unfortunately, the article's misgivings have been highlighted in recent attempts to portray it as a complete trainwreck and the epitome of a POV article. Okay, so the article wasn't perfect and there is still work to be done, but your work over the last month, especially the last week, has been truly

849:

If possible, try to find some more recent references to make the same point. Okay. If we're going to an article on small powers, please use sandbox 2 on my user page to prepare the article before it's created, to prevent possible speedy deletion, or having a half finished article up. Also, I think we

839:

Ok. but, I think that instead of saying they're are often considered great powers, I think it would be more NPOV to say sometimes. Though I see Russia and China refered to as Great powers more then middle powers, and vice versa for the UK and France, I think saying sometimes would be more NPOV. Plus,

724:

Errr... Have to disagree with your last statement. Having had close contact with many hundreds of D&D players over 30 years, I can state with certainty that many care more for their fantasy campaigns than history. History is merely what was, while D&D is an ongoing act of creation. Not saying

2120:

It's good of you to take the trouble. He's welcome to propose a specific change, especially if it's based on reliable sources, preferably from the IR literature. It behoves us to keep an open mind. Or, if you have your own formula, I'm sure other people would be open to a suggestion. Frankly, "Great

1995:

Thanks for pruning the excessive coverage. I don't think we can justify including the paternity rumour itself, because it's probably false, and because we can't deal with the matter adequately in an article of this length without investing it with undue weight, creating the false impression of extra

1908:

I don't think we could really justify that. In this case a compromise isn't warranted or satisfactory, as Thorpe's conclusion is pretty definitive, and his evidence supersedes Horne. After Horne but before Thorpe, a reasonable case could be made for including the paternity rumour, although a trivial

1591:

Hey there, I just wanted to let you know how much thanks you deserve for your work on the Margaret Thatcher article. I began the process of reconstructing the article, adding citations, and expanding the Prime Minister section, resulting in the article's attaining GA status. Though not perfect, I am

709:

That doesn't mean it's more notable; the claim isn't tenable. The most you could say is that for a handful of hobbyists the name of a setting is a minor detail in a game. Frankly it's doubtful if something that's little more than an entry on a fantasy map deserves its own article on Knowledge (XXG).

2136:

I've tried talking to our anon IP editor on their talk page and, be it they don't know how to use talk pages or what, they haven't replied. I'm not sure exactly how cooperative the IP wants to be exactly, so just coming to you because you seem to be the other somewhat party involved in this. One of

2025:

I agree that the talk page would be the most appropriate venue, although I fear that past discussions there haven't always been well informed. Still, what we're considering is a problem of subtle emphasis, so there's room for reasonable disagreement. My own concern is that the paternity rumour is a

1157:

Only real question I have is that the article defines India, Canada, Argentina, and Belgium as strong small powers. I would think that atleast India, Canada, and Argentina are considered middle powers. But, would that mean (going by small powers), that countries such as Morocco, Chile, and Pakistan

1111:

Sure, and we should say the same about the contested middle/small powers. Middle powers are sometimes classified as small powers by those who classify great powers as middle powers. Meanwhile, I'll revert to the previous main text because I think the sourced examples are needed so that the sentence

933:

I think we’ve opened a can of worms here. Authorities who classify nations as significant as Canada as small powers must presumably classify great powers as middle powers. That means the middle powers that aren’t also great powers will almost certainly also be classified by them as small powers, so

787:

Hey, for your sources on Great and Middle powers, do you have any newer sources, hopefully from the 21st century. As I think it's better to use sources from 2000 + to refer to the powers of today (we might have old sources in the Middle power article which will need to be fixed, but I'm pretty sure

604:

That's being unfair to Horne, who was given access to the Macmillan papers on condition he didn't publish until after Macmillan's death, to avoid any embarrassment to the living. Horne was entirely frank about Boothby's bisexuality and Lady Dorothy's extramarital affair (which was a great source of

572:

The requested reference was provided in the edit summary. The secondary and tertiary sources are being openly misused by the anonymous user, and as even the temporary inclusion of prurient and unsubstantiated gossip on these pages is unethical, I would ask that you be good enough to revert the page

2088:

Thanks. Just lucky to be passing when it happened. A moment later, you'd have done it, and I might be congratulating you. Blanking sourced material without discussion strikes me as a very passive-aggressive way to edit an article. He seems to be a new user but he didn't break the 3-revert rule, so

1614:

Thanks. People with strong opinions and a shortage of facts seem to want to turn the talk page into a forum. It's a sideshow. The priority is to ensure that the hysteria being whipped up there doesn't encourage the haters to use a claim of consensus for change on the talk page as cover for cutting

1176:

That isn't stated explicitly in the cited source, but it sounds like a reasonable inference. On the other hand, other authorities do consider Morocco, Chile and Pakistan to be middle powers, so I suppose it's always well to bear in mind that terms like great power, middle power and small power are

970:

I think the best solution for us to do is keep the map as it is now (except add Russia and China). We write on the map nations in red are often considered middle powers, while the dark red countries are also often considered great powers, and the article already explains that the overlapping lists

902:

Well, if we're going to be coloring the countries a different color, we should wait till after we have the small power article so we have the list of countries down, and do it all at once, instead of doing it multiple times while we're making the article. Because if I understand correctly, most of

1964:

his paternity. Not to mention the rumour at all, though, seems to me a serious mistake. It has attained wide currency and been taken seriously by serious writers. To dismiss it as "trivial" surely misses the point: if one thinks it true (or even if Macmillan thought that many of those he dealt

648:

Our reading of Cullen is no more trustworthy or authoritative than is our reading of Ball and Horne, but as secondary sources Ball and Horne are to be preferred, and they discredit and discount the rumour, which was late and obscure. Including what appears to be merely a malicious slur in a short

589:

The only book I have about it presents the info as non-scurrilous. I haven't seen the other two books, though Horne as an official biographer is unlikely to be neutral IMHO. The best place to deal with this is on the talk page - then a larger proportion of editors can give an opinion. If you keep

1265:

Okay. Try to start constructing the page on my sandbox #2. Strange though, I would think that countries like India and Brazil are somewhere between becoming a great power and a middle power. However, that's my opinion, and several academics. And academics are split on classifying most countries.

803:

No, we're talking about the post-Cold War era and there hasn't been a real paradigm shift in international relations in the last decade or so. If it helps I'm sure I can find more recent references to add as well which will make the same point. Small powers is the term used in the source so it's

2072:

Hey, I was looking through the recent history for that article to get a better understanding of what had been deleted etc, and noticed you'd reverted his edits before I got around to it myself. I must say nice work on the fast editing, and I agree that something radical like that should best be

1806:

Lachrie, you will see that I have withdrawn my vote for deletion of the 'Music of the United Kingdom' project, and propose the abandonment of the Mfd: I am persuaded by your point that its deletion would be prejudicial, or create a negative nationalist bias. Clearly that is the spectre which my

1060:

I think that we should say that the overlapping shows that there is no consensus. those academics say what we think are great powers as middle powers because they think they're middle powers, not great powers. Or they believe that great power is for ancient powers. Because we list them as great

2304:

As you know, it's really up to the IP to propose changes on the talk page. I can have a look at his proposed text when I have more time, to see what can be salvaged from it, but Suez is a big subject and rewriting the section properly is a lot of work. The problem with the IP is that he's also

693:

Saw your redirect of the D&D region, understand your reasoning and I will not revert; but understand that reality does not take precedence over fiction just because it is reality. The fictional Nicholas Nickleby probably takes precedence over a real person of the same name. In the case of

1230:

by Laura Neack has an interesting discussion about small powers in international politics and their relationship to collective security, and includes among the successful examples of small powers Israel, South Korea and Kuwait. The author sees small powers as a category related to developing

766:

Hi. The present version is an improvement on the version of 22-May of Beeswaxcandle. This is because many more of the figures now have a common source. In a comparative article it's much better to rely on comparative figures from a single comparative source so the method of measurement is as

1933:

I appreciate your effort at clarification but I think expanding on the rumour only serves to undermine the integrity of the article, because it gives the rumour undue weight and creates a false impression that Boothby might have attempted incest, a meaning entirely opposite to the source.

2624:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

1470:

No, the results are a statistical fact. Quantitative history is measurable. Complex causes could be used to exclude almost any statement in the lead. Poor result smacks of obfuscation and POV-pushing. Napoleon in Russia in 1812? A poor result! Maybe, but also a gross understatement.

2697:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

1786:

Let's start with three objections from you. Please list them and some cogent reasons as to why you object. Provide an alternative edit if you would like. Also feel free to list any sources of mine that you find sub-par. Can we start with this, for now, and for a start?

1407:

fair enough, although I doubt if if it will come to anything, If you want to add the cite and add that he is according to reports about to sue.. I am more than happy to include that ..just that it should not be too dramatic. in a neutral sort of way. best regards

1965:

with thought it true) it has important implications for how one interprets HM's own psychological development. To ignore it altogether could be seen as a cover-up. Far better to say the story has been out there, but latest scholarship now discounts it.

2551:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

1199:

If we're going to start a small power page, we need to find more sources listing small powers. As I know for sure that Canada, India, and Argentina are more powerful then Morocco, Chile, and Pakistan. And most academics will agree on that.

820:

A sentence like "It has also been argued that certain nations are not strong enough to be middle powers" is too vague to convey any useful information, so we should definitely restore the examples cited in the source itself.

2305:

loading it up with hostile commentary in a rather sensationalist way, so it's not unreasonable of you to revert him. If we are going to include material like that, we obviously do have to balance it with alternative views.

1763:

Fine, then do the adult thing and answer my "Special Relationship" talk page requests. You know, if you don't reply in five days, then the edit hold will be appealed. So there is some work to be done between now and

750:

Hi Lachrie, i've noted that you have been working in that article, but you are working things which was done in the past; the version of 22-May of Beeswaxcandle was good, then the work of months was totally destroyed.

2803: 2725: 2652: 2579: 2288:

article. I am not against having appropriate text, I am only against having this one editor insert skewed interpretations of the Williams book. I am receptive to seeing your version of what the article should be.

1885:

I have suggested an alternative formulation which, while making it clear that the new biography discounts Boothby's paternity, avoids such a categorical statement that Thorpe will necessarily have the last word.

2494:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 1866:

vol. 1 (1988), p. 88, mentions the paternity rumour in passing as well, but the rumour still only found its way into print after it had been already privately discounted and after all four involved were dead.

1013:

On reflection that seems easiest, and we should include in the caption that middle powers are sometimes classified as small powers by authorities who classify great powers as middle powers (e.g. Chapnick).

2371:...yes brainiac, I am using sockpuppets and IP's from all over the world to try to manipulate the page... so why don't you open a SPI instead of accusing me? Otherwise, why don't you just f**k yourself! -- 625:

Re: Cullen, true enough she's tertiary, but her reading of the material can actually be considered more trustworthy than ours - since it is a published view rather than our personal one. That said, the

2787:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2709:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2636:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2563:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1550:

I am saddened by your lack of discussion here. I have removed the excessive negative comment from the lede and I respectfully request that you do not insert similar overly negative comments again. (

2089:

who knows what he's thinking? He hasn't yet bothered to explain. But articles comparing nations have a tendency to enflame. It might be an idea to keep an eye on the page in case it happens again!

1235:

by Ulrik A. Federspiel has a detailed discussion of Denmark as an example of a small power. The fact we don't have an article on small powers is actually beginning to look like a serious omission.

2323:

The guy has a long history of using various 92.7.x.x addresses to push his viewpoint regarding the Suez Crisis and the Cuban Missile Crisis. Especially notable is the edit-warring block listed at

1502:

No need. Follow the links to the cited sources, and all the other media reports on the results. Asking other editors to restate easily obtainable facts at length is an unreasonable imposition.

2773: 1830:

saying that the rumor had been refuted, but that doesn't mean the rumor never existed. Better to say that he was long-rumored to be her father, but that your source denies it based on . -

25: 1534:

no comment eh..well here is your edit summary ..statistically-verifiable loss of seats of historic magnitude...what does that mean? that they lost more seats than ever before? (

2456: 137: 1177:

shorthands which can easily obscure large power disparities among states consigned to the same broad category, and not to read too much significance into such labels.

1807:

misgivings have raised, and I much regret it. I hope the Project will find a way forward that is useful. Thankyou for helping me to see the matter in another light.

557:

on the Harold Macmillan page 4 times with 24 hours. Please don't do this - if you disagree with something take your opinion to the talk page as I asked. Thank you.

1446:

Is a bit much in the lede, wouldn't you say? Actually the way that they were historic was the very low turnout, in what way do you see these results as historic? (

2217: 2451:

because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the

1364: 2413: 2403: 181: 1960:

Very well, I have dropped the mention of Boothby's attempt to seduce SM -- though I thought the text clear enough that this was being used as evidence

2399: 329: 2409: 2239: 426: 2826: 2739: 2666: 2593: 2519: 177: 360: 54:

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the

2448: 404: 155: 303: 2026:

dubious minor point in an article which already tends to over-sensationalise a few incidents in a long and eventful public career.

1706: 232: 159: 1300:

Sure, I'll make a start when I can. Unfortunately I can't do it immediately, as I've still got my hands full with other projects.

51: 338: 333: 282: 2822: 2735: 2662: 2589: 2515: 1569:

I was busy. As has been explained repeatedly, it's your edit in the "lede" (sic) which is misleading and ought to be reverted.

2796: 2718: 2645: 2572: 2406:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1718: 453:- good job, and thanks for the references and notes. We're still not quite 'there', but you've covered most of the distance.-- 264: 101: 2011:

wider consensus) if we copied this section to date onto the discussion page for Harold Macmillan. Would you be agreeable?

1722: 418: 269: 193: 1827: 1687:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block

29: 400: 294: 286: 210: 206: 168: 2506:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

1728: 382: 342: 228: 189: 2808: 2730: 2657: 2584: 2511: 522: 484: 355: 351: 215: 172: 2390:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

311: 197: 164: 2243: 2204: 1714: 1679: 1663: 307: 298: 95: 91: 1792: 1769: 1737: 2784: 2706: 2633: 2560: 1671: 413: 409: 364: 236: 202: 45: 2452: 2444: 2152:

Hi, the unsourced changes desired by the IP, all promoting Germany as a GP, were originally introduced by

2142: 2110: 2078: 511: 473: 2507: 1710: 386: 277: 260: 223: 132: 2335: 2294: 1835: 756: 730: 699: 630:

of rumours is still a subject that can be mentioned on WP - as long as it's not about a living person.

472:

That anonymous editor just moved the "Academic" area above "Uniform" area. I think that's appropriate.

273: 87: 2330:

I appreciate that salvaging the usable bits from his additions will be serious work. There's no rush!

2188:

Hello, can you please tell me who do you think is anonymous sockpuppetring behind IP 217.209.168.136?

2198: 2193: 1555: 1539: 1521: 1491: 1459: 1451: 1431: 1413: 1348: 2767: 2693: 2620: 2547: 2529: 2483: 2474: 1667: 1387: 396: 2357: 2324: 1788: 1765: 1733: 1604: 1271: 1205: 1163: 1066: 976: 908: 855: 793: 2780: 2702: 2629: 2556: 2503: 2487: 105: 2376: 1812: 1592:

100% convinced that the article was much more improved than where it stood prior to my overhaul.

635: 595: 562: 422: 529:

I have no objection to splitting the article, I just don't want correct information to vanish.

2464: 2429: 2391: 2284:

Please compose a suitable replacement for the text that IP 92.7.x.x has been putting into the

2138: 2106: 2074: 678: 55: 2792: 2714: 2641: 2568: 2499: 2491: 492:

No, the anonymous editor deleted two sections. Look more carefully. You should be aware that

347: 219: 127: 2815: 2331: 2290: 2285: 2165: 2058: 2016: 1970: 1891: 1831: 752: 726: 695: 458: 2795:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2788: 2717:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2710: 2644:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2637: 2571:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2564: 2502:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2495: 123: 2395: 1551: 1535: 1517: 1487: 1455: 1447: 1427: 1409: 1344: 674: 59: 1231:

countries, and an important one, as it "contains the majority of the world's countries".

2353: 2213: 2157: 1638: 1600: 1337: 1267: 1201: 1159: 1062: 972: 904: 851: 789: 450: 390: 2420:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

2372: 1808: 631: 591: 558: 1709:

to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording, and content that represents

1693:

Editors violating the rule will usually be blocked for 24 hours for a first incident

2460: 2425: 2421: 2306: 2261: 2221: 2169: 2161: 2153: 2122: 2090: 2027: 1997: 1935: 1910: 1868: 1847: 1750: 1616: 1570: 1503: 1472: 1390: 1367: 1327: 1301: 1236: 1227: 1178: 1121: 1113: 1015: 935: 877: 822: 805: 768: 711: 650: 606: 574: 530: 497: 2759: 2684: 2611: 2538: 1796: 58:

field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing!

2054: 2012: 1966: 1887: 454: 1112:

conveys at least some useful information about the middle/small power debate.

590:

quoting sources though - you're likely to win this:) That's the way forward.

1634: 1340:, who said that he would sue for defamation over his inclusion on the list" 1061:

powers on wikipedia does not mean the author thinks they are great powers.

1615:

sourced facts from the article, which I think is what happened yesterday.

1486:

Ok then, please tell me...In what way exactly are they historic results? (

1232: 1516:

I am asking you..for your idea of what is historic about these results..(

2799:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2721:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2648:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2575:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

1388:

Home Secretary Jacqui Smith to fight shock-jock Michael Savage's lawsuit

2777:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2490:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)

1336:"Controversially, the list included outspoken American talk radio host 50: 2830: 2743: 2670: 2597: 2523: 2468: 2433: 2380: 2361: 2339: 2314: 2298: 2269: 2247: 2229: 2206: 2177: 2146: 2130: 2114: 2098: 2082: 2062: 2035: 2020: 2005: 1974: 1943: 1918: 1895: 1876: 1855: 1839: 1816: 1773: 1758: 1741: 1642: 1624: 1608: 1578: 1559: 1543: 1525: 1511: 1495: 1480: 1463: 1435: 1417: 1398: 1375: 1352: 1309: 1275: 1244: 1209: 1186: 1167: 1129: 1070: 1023: 980: 943: 912: 885: 859: 830: 813: 797: 776: 760: 734: 719: 703: 683: 658: 639: 614: 599: 582: 566: 538: 524: 505: 486: 462: 62: 1226:

Agreed. I'll get some sources together as time becomes available.

44:

on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to

2812:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 2802:

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review

2724:

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review

2651:

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review

2578:

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review

510:

Ah, sorry about that. I just compared the last edit they made.

2771:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All

1705:

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's

971:

show that there is no consensus on the power classification.

247: 74: 19: 1654: 1721:. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary 2459:

if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you.

649:

article obviously would be to give it undue prominence.

32:

to this 💕. If you decide that you need help, check out

2783:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

2705:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

2632:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

2559:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

2394:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2189: 1748: 554: 1713:

among editors. You can post a request for help at an

2327:

from last August. This guy is likely not going away.

2455:. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at 2482:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 2260:It makes no difference if you're a blocked user. 1699:Do not edit war even if you believe you are right 449:Hi, Lachrie. I've just seen your improvements to 2386:Disambiguation link notification for February 16 2216:posting as an IP. Just another sock to add to 1365:Jacqui Smith sued over shock jock accusations 725:that's necessarily a healthy mental state... 8: 1747:Childish copycat response to my own warning 1674:with others may be blocked if they continue. 468:RE: The Royal High School - Anonymous Editor 2238:this ip is the main ip not a sock puppet ! 1846:would give it undue weight in the article. 2754: 2191:I also have some doubts about it. Thanks. 1662:You currently appear to be engaged in an 1158:are considered just plain small powers? 36:below, ask me on my talk page, or place 133:Where to ask questions or make comments 2449:Knowledge (XXG):Possibly unfree files 2443:A file that you uploaded or altered, 2212:Hi, based on his contributions, it's 494:this article has already been blanked 7: 2768:2021 Arbitration Committee elections 2694:2018 Arbitration Committee elections 2621:2017 Arbitration Committee elections 2548:2016 Arbitration Committee elections 2439:Possibly unfree File:RHS Captain.png 1731:from editing without further notice. 2785:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process 2751:ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message 2707:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process 2634:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process 2561:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process 92:The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG) 2678:ArbCom 2018 election voter message 2605:ArbCom 2017 election voter message 28:to Knowledge (XXG)! Thank you for 14: 2508:review the candidates' statements 2352:Please see resumed discussion. -- 673:Hi. Please see my points on the 2758: 2683: 2610: 2537: 49: 15: 2806:and submit your choices on the 2728:and submit your choices on the 2655:and submit your choices on the 138:Request administrator attention 2691:Hello, Lachrie. Voting in the 2618:Hello, Lachrie. Voting in the 2545:Hello, Lachrie. Voting in the 2514:. For the Election committee, 2484:Arbitration Committee election 2475:ArbCom elections are now open! 2099:12:55, 27 September 2011 (UTC) 2083:12:04, 27 September 2011 (UTC) 1: 2831:00:22, 23 November 2021 (UTC) 2744:18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) 2598:22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) 2524:17:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 2434:17:04, 16 February 2014 (UTC) 2340:16:02, 15 December 2011 (UTC) 2315:15:52, 15 December 2011 (UTC) 2299:15:39, 15 December 2011 (UTC) 2178:14:03, 13 November 2011 (UTC) 2147:12:43, 13 November 2011 (UTC) 2073:brought up on the talk page. 1828:Robert Boothby, Baron Boothby 1797:18:17, 13 February 2011 (UTC) 1774:03:21, 14 February 2011 (UTC) 1759:18:26, 13 February 2011 (UTC) 1742:18:02, 13 February 2011 (UTC) 1725:. If edit warring continues, 463:22:23, 24 November 2007 (UTC) 182:Biographies of living persons 70: 63:09:27, 5 September 2007 (UTC) 2671:18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) 2469:15:27, 5 November 2015 (UTC) 2381:23:18, 28 October 2012 (UTC) 2270:19:13, 21 October 2011 (UTC) 2248:19:02, 21 October 2011 (UTC) 2230:23:28, 20 October 2011 (UTC) 2207:21:26, 20 October 2011 (UTC) 2131:01:19, 15 October 2011 (UTC) 2115:00:31, 15 October 2011 (UTC) 1643:08:10, 15 January 2011 (UTC) 539:22:00, 11 January 2009 (UTC) 525:21:54, 11 January 2009 (UTC) 506:21:46, 11 January 2009 (UTC) 496:by these anonymous editors. 487:21:42, 11 January 2009 (UTC) 2582:and submit your choices on 2510:and submit your choices on 1826:You removed a section from 1781: 1426:Cool. That reads well. Ta.( 1154:It's fine the way it is now 1120:) 23:41, 29 May 2009 (UTC) 207:Policy for non-free content 178:What Knowledge (XXG) is not 2851: 2823:MediaWiki message delivery 2736:MediaWiki message delivery 2663:MediaWiki message delivery 2590:MediaWiki message delivery 2580:the candidates' statements 2516:MediaWiki message delivery 2362:09:36, 28 March 2012 (UTC) 735:14:52, 18 April 2009 (UTC) 720:02:54, 18 April 2009 (UTC) 704:16:43, 17 April 2009 (UTC) 659:22:07, 14 March 2009 (UTC) 640:21:48, 14 March 2009 (UTC) 615:09:29, 14 March 2009 (UTC) 600:08:45, 14 March 2009 (UTC) 583:16:40, 13 March 2009 (UTC) 567:16:28, 13 March 2009 (UTC) 124:Frequently asked questions 48:on talk pages by clicking 2063:23:45, 25 July 2011 (UTC) 2036:21:49, 25 July 2011 (UTC) 2021:21:24, 25 July 2011 (UTC) 2006:20:17, 25 July 2011 (UTC) 1975:19:37, 25 July 2011 (UTC) 1944:19:18, 25 July 2011 (UTC) 1919:18:48, 25 July 2011 (UTC) 1896:18:06, 25 July 2011 (UTC) 1877:14:40, 25 July 2011 (UTC) 1856:14:19, 25 July 2011 (UTC) 1840:13:46, 25 July 2011 (UTC) 1822:Sarah Macmillan paternity 1817:10:40, 18 June 2011 (UTC) 1625:10:57, 16 July 2009 (UTC) 1609:22:52, 15 July 2009 (UTC) 1233:The Power of Small Powers 684:22:19, 3 April 2009 (UTC) 553:On the 12th of March you 2820:to your user talk page. 2310: 2265: 2225: 2173: 2156:, another sockpuppet of 2126: 2094: 2031: 2001: 1939: 1914: 1872: 1851: 1754: 1620: 1579:12:37, 5 July 2009 (UTC) 1574: 1560:23:11, 4 July 2009 (UTC) 1544:10:10, 4 July 2009 (UTC) 1526:10:03, 4 July 2009 (UTC) 1512:10:01, 4 July 2009 (UTC) 1507: 1496:09:49, 4 July 2009 (UTC) 1481:09:34, 4 July 2009 (UTC) 1476: 1464:07:50, 4 July 2009 (UTC) 1436:21:13, 3 June 2009 (UTC) 1418:20:49, 3 June 2009 (UTC) 1399:20:42, 3 June 2009 (UTC) 1394: 1376:20:36, 3 June 2009 (UTC) 1371: 1353:20:04, 3 June 2009 (UTC) 1310:21:05, 31 May 2009 (UTC) 1305: 1276:14:20, 31 May 2009 (UTC) 1245:05:55, 31 May 2009 (UTC) 1240: 1210:04:48, 30 May 2009 (UTC) 1187:00:22, 30 May 2009 (UTC) 1182: 1168:23:59, 29 May 2009 (UTC) 1130:23:41, 29 May 2009 (UTC) 1125: 1117: 1071:23:35, 29 May 2009 (UTC) 1024:23:29, 29 May 2009 (UTC) 1019: 981:23:16, 29 May 2009 (UTC) 944:22:57, 29 May 2009 (UTC) 939: 913:22:12, 29 May 2009 (UTC) 886:21:14, 29 May 2009 (UTC) 881: 860:20:29, 29 May 2009 (UTC) 831:20:18, 29 May 2009 (UTC) 826: 814:20:13, 29 May 2009 (UTC) 809: 798:19:59, 29 May 2009 (UTC) 777:18:26, 24 May 2009 (UTC) 772: 761:18:09, 24 May 2009 (UTC) 715: 654: 610: 578: 534: 501: 88:Knowledge (XXG) tutorial 1715:appropriate noticeboard 1343:He didn't sue did he. ( 746:List of largest empires 361:Pages needing attention 147:Policies and guidelines 2184:Possible sockpuppetry? 2053:Done. See you there! 1659: 1228:The New Foreign Policy 783:Great and Middle Power 2781:Arbitration Committee 2765:Hello! Voting in the 2703:Arbitration Committee 2630:Arbitration Committee 2557:Arbitration Committee 2530:ArbCom Elections 2016 2488:Arbitration Committee 2453:file description page 2447:, has been listed at 1658: 874:rigorously consistent 689:Lordship of the Isles 156:Neutral point of view 106:upload and use images 2445:File:RHS Captain.png 2422:opt-out instructions 555:reverted information 233:Conflict of interest 160:No original research 2492:arbitration process 2404:fix with Dab solver 2325:User talk:92.7.4.36 1678:In particular, the 339:The perfect article 283:No personal attacks 2797:arbitration policy 2719:arbitration policy 2646:arbitration policy 2573:arbitration policy 2532:: Voting now open! 2504:arbitration policy 2412:• Join us at the 1862:I see that Horne, 1719:dispute resolution 1660: 1333:from your edit... 410:Join a WikiProject 334:Develop an article 330:Be bold in editing 30:your contributions 2838: 2837: 2833: 2417: 2392:Scottish American 2367:bullying brainiac 2348:Talk:Gordon Brown 2068:Great Powers Page 1782:Let's try this... 1680:three-revert rule 1668:edit disruptively 1587:Margaret Thatcher 549:Three revert rule 442: 441: 438: 437: 434: 433: 270:Assume good faith 244: 243: 194:Three-revert rule 69: 68: 2842: 2821: 2819: 2762: 2755: 2687: 2614: 2541: 2407: 2400:check to confirm 2286:Harold Macmillan 2201: 2196: 2166:relevant section 1864:Harold Macmillan 1657: 1442:Historic defeats 1326:regarding Smith 681: 517: 514: 479: 476: 419:Useful templates 321:Writing articles 295:Community Portal 287:No legal threats 265:Resolve disputes 248: 211:Image use policy 169:Reliable sources 96:Getting mentored 75: 71: 53: 42: 41: 24:Hello, Lachrie! 20: 16: 2850: 2849: 2845: 2844: 2843: 2841: 2840: 2839: 2813: 2753: 2748: 2747: 2688: 2680: 2675: 2674: 2615: 2607: 2602: 2601: 2585:the voting page 2542: 2534: 2512:the voting page 2478: 2441: 2414:DPL WikiProject 2396:English America 2388: 2369: 2350: 2282: 2240:217.209.168.136 2199: 2194: 2186: 2070: 1824: 1804: 1784: 1723:page protection 1655: 1653: 1589: 1444: 1331: 785: 748: 691: 679: 671: 551: 515: 512: 477: 474: 470: 447: 375: 343:Manual of style 322: 261:Build consensus 253: 229:Deletion policy 190:Manual of Style 148: 116: 80: 79:Getting started 65: 39: 38: 12: 11: 5: 2848: 2846: 2836: 2835: 2804:the candidates 2774:eligible users 2763: 2752: 2749: 2726:the candidates 2689: 2682: 2681: 2679: 2676: 2653:the candidates 2616: 2609: 2608: 2606: 2603: 2543: 2536: 2535: 2533: 2527: 2481: 2477: 2472: 2457:the discussion 2440: 2437: 2387: 2384: 2368: 2365: 2349: 2346: 2345: 2344: 2343: 2342: 2328: 2318: 2317: 2281: 2278: 2277: 2276: 2275: 2274: 2273: 2272: 2253: 2252: 2251: 2250: 2233: 2232: 2185: 2182: 2181: 2180: 2134: 2133: 2102: 2101: 2069: 2066: 2051: 2050: 2049: 2048: 2047: 2046: 2045: 2044: 2043: 2042: 2041: 2040: 2039: 2038: 1984: 1983: 1982: 1981: 1980: 1979: 1978: 1977: 1951: 1950: 1949: 1948: 1947: 1946: 1926: 1925: 1924: 1923: 1922: 1921: 1901: 1900: 1899: 1898: 1880: 1879: 1859: 1858: 1832:Jason A. Quest 1823: 1820: 1803: 1800: 1789:Mythbuster2010 1783: 1780: 1779: 1778: 1777: 1776: 1766:Mythbuster2010 1734:Mythbuster2010 1703: 1702: 1696: 1690: 1682:states that: 1675: 1652: 1649: 1648: 1647: 1646: 1645: 1633:Nice edits. -- 1628: 1627: 1588: 1585: 1584: 1583: 1582: 1581: 1564: 1563: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1529: 1484: 1483: 1443: 1440: 1424: 1423: 1422: 1421: 1402: 1401: 1382:And this from 1379: 1378: 1338:Michael Savage 1330: 1324: 1323: 1322: 1321: 1320: 1319: 1318: 1317: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1312: 1287: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1192: 1191: 1190: 1189: 1171: 1170: 1155: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1148: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1144: 1143: 1142: 1141: 1140: 1139: 1138: 1137: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1132: 1090: 1089: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1084: 1083: 1082: 1081: 1080: 1079: 1078: 1077: 1076: 1075: 1074: 1073: 1041: 1040: 1039: 1038: 1037: 1036: 1035: 1034: 1033: 1032: 1031: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1027: 1026: 996: 995: 994: 993: 992: 991: 990: 989: 988: 987: 986: 985: 984: 983: 955: 954: 953: 952: 951: 950: 949: 948: 947: 946: 922: 921: 920: 919: 918: 917: 916: 915: 893: 892: 891: 890: 889: 888: 865: 864: 863: 862: 844: 843: 842: 841: 834: 833: 817: 816: 784: 781: 780: 779: 747: 744: 742: 740: 739: 738: 737: 690: 687: 670: 667: 666: 665: 664: 663: 662: 661: 643: 642: 620: 619: 618: 617: 586: 585: 550: 547: 546: 545: 544: 543: 542: 541: 469: 466: 451:English Armada 446: 445:English Armada 443: 440: 439: 436: 435: 432: 431: 430: 429: 416: 407: 393: 377: 376: 373: 370: 369: 368: 367: 358: 356:Disambiguation 345: 336: 324: 323: 320: 317: 316: 315: 314: 301: 291: 290: 289: 280: 267: 255: 254: 251: 245: 242: 241: 240: 239: 226: 216:External links 213: 200: 186: 185: 184: 175: 173:Citing sources 162: 150: 149: 146: 143: 142: 141: 140: 135: 130: 118: 117: 114: 111: 110: 109: 108: 98: 82: 81: 78: 67: 66: 46:sign your name 23: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2847: 2834: 2832: 2828: 2824: 2817: 2811: 2810: 2805: 2800: 2798: 2794: 2790: 2786: 2782: 2776: 2775: 2770: 2769: 2764: 2761: 2757: 2756: 2750: 2746: 2745: 2741: 2737: 2733: 2732: 2727: 2722: 2720: 2716: 2712: 2708: 2704: 2699: 2696: 2695: 2686: 2677: 2673: 2672: 2668: 2664: 2660: 2659: 2654: 2649: 2647: 2643: 2639: 2635: 2631: 2626: 2623: 2622: 2613: 2604: 2600: 2599: 2595: 2591: 2587: 2586: 2581: 2576: 2574: 2570: 2566: 2562: 2558: 2553: 2550: 2549: 2540: 2531: 2528: 2526: 2525: 2521: 2517: 2513: 2509: 2505: 2501: 2497: 2493: 2489: 2485: 2476: 2473: 2471: 2470: 2466: 2462: 2458: 2454: 2450: 2446: 2438: 2436: 2435: 2431: 2427: 2423: 2418: 2415: 2411: 2405: 2401: 2397: 2393: 2385: 2383: 2382: 2378: 2374: 2366: 2364: 2363: 2359: 2355: 2347: 2341: 2337: 2333: 2329: 2326: 2322: 2321: 2320: 2319: 2316: 2312: 2308: 2303: 2302: 2301: 2300: 2296: 2292: 2287: 2279: 2271: 2267: 2263: 2259: 2258: 2257: 2256: 2255: 2254: 2249: 2245: 2241: 2237: 2236: 2235: 2234: 2231: 2227: 2223: 2219: 2215: 2211: 2210: 2209: 2208: 2205: 2203: 2202: 2197: 2190: 2183: 2179: 2175: 2171: 2167: 2163: 2159: 2155: 2151: 2150: 2149: 2148: 2144: 2140: 2132: 2128: 2124: 2119: 2118: 2117: 2116: 2112: 2108: 2100: 2096: 2092: 2087: 2086: 2085: 2084: 2080: 2076: 2067: 2065: 2064: 2060: 2056: 2037: 2033: 2029: 2024: 2023: 2022: 2018: 2014: 2009: 2008: 2007: 2003: 1999: 1994: 1993: 1992: 1991: 1990: 1989: 1988: 1987: 1986: 1985: 1976: 1972: 1968: 1963: 1959: 1958: 1957: 1956: 1955: 1954: 1953: 1952: 1945: 1941: 1937: 1932: 1931: 1930: 1929: 1928: 1927: 1920: 1916: 1912: 1907: 1906: 1905: 1904: 1903: 1902: 1897: 1893: 1889: 1884: 1883: 1882: 1881: 1878: 1874: 1870: 1865: 1861: 1860: 1857: 1853: 1849: 1844: 1843: 1842: 1841: 1837: 1833: 1829: 1821: 1819: 1818: 1814: 1810: 1801: 1799: 1798: 1794: 1790: 1775: 1771: 1767: 1762: 1761: 1760: 1756: 1752: 1749: 1746: 1745: 1744: 1743: 1739: 1735: 1732: 1730: 1724: 1720: 1716: 1712: 1708: 1700: 1697: 1694: 1691: 1688: 1685: 1684: 1683: 1681: 1676: 1673: 1670:or refuse to 1669: 1665: 1651:February 2011 1650: 1644: 1640: 1636: 1632: 1631: 1630: 1629: 1626: 1622: 1618: 1613: 1612: 1611: 1610: 1606: 1602: 1597: 1593: 1586: 1580: 1576: 1572: 1568: 1567: 1566: 1565: 1561: 1557: 1553: 1549: 1548: 1547: 1545: 1541: 1537: 1527: 1523: 1519: 1515: 1514: 1513: 1509: 1505: 1501: 1500: 1499: 1497: 1493: 1489: 1482: 1478: 1474: 1469: 1468: 1467: 1465: 1461: 1457: 1453: 1449: 1441: 1439: 1437: 1433: 1429: 1419: 1415: 1411: 1406: 1405: 1404: 1403: 1400: 1396: 1392: 1389: 1385: 1381: 1380: 1377: 1373: 1369: 1366: 1362: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1354: 1350: 1346: 1341: 1339: 1334: 1329: 1325: 1311: 1307: 1303: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1277: 1273: 1269: 1264: 1263: 1262: 1261: 1260: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1255: 1246: 1242: 1238: 1234: 1229: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1222: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1218: 1211: 1207: 1203: 1198: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1193: 1188: 1184: 1180: 1175: 1174: 1173: 1172: 1169: 1165: 1161: 1156: 1153: 1152: 1131: 1127: 1123: 1119: 1115: 1110: 1109: 1108: 1107: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1103: 1102: 1101: 1100: 1099: 1098: 1097: 1096: 1095: 1094: 1093: 1092: 1091: 1072: 1068: 1064: 1059: 1058: 1057: 1056: 1055: 1054: 1053: 1052: 1051: 1050: 1049: 1048: 1047: 1046: 1045: 1044: 1043: 1042: 1025: 1021: 1017: 1012: 1011: 1010: 1009: 1008: 1007: 1006: 1005: 1004: 1003: 1002: 1001: 1000: 999: 998: 997: 982: 978: 974: 969: 968: 967: 966: 965: 964: 963: 962: 961: 960: 959: 958: 957: 956: 945: 941: 937: 932: 931: 930: 929: 928: 927: 926: 925: 924: 923: 914: 910: 906: 901: 900: 899: 898: 897: 896: 895: 894: 887: 883: 879: 875: 871: 870: 869: 868: 867: 866: 861: 857: 853: 848: 847: 846: 845: 838: 837: 836: 835: 832: 828: 824: 819: 818: 815: 811: 807: 802: 801: 800: 799: 795: 791: 782: 778: 774: 770: 765: 764: 763: 762: 758: 754: 745: 743: 736: 732: 728: 723: 722: 721: 717: 713: 708: 707: 706: 705: 701: 697: 688: 686: 685: 682: 677:. Thanks. -- 676: 668: 660: 656: 652: 647: 646: 645: 644: 641: 637: 633: 629: 624: 623: 622: 621: 616: 612: 608: 603: 602: 601: 597: 593: 588: 587: 584: 580: 576: 571: 570: 569: 568: 564: 560: 556: 548: 540: 536: 532: 528: 527: 526: 523: 521: 520: 509: 508: 507: 503: 499: 495: 491: 490: 489: 488: 485: 483: 482: 467: 465: 464: 460: 456: 452: 444: 428: 424: 420: 417: 415: 411: 408: 406: 402: 398: 394: 392: 388: 384: 381: 380: 379: 378: 374:Miscellaneous 372: 371: 366: 362: 359: 357: 353: 349: 346: 344: 340: 337: 335: 331: 328: 327: 326: 325: 319: 318: 313: 312:Mailing lists 309: 305: 302: 300: 296: 293: 292: 288: 284: 281: 279: 275: 271: 268: 266: 262: 259: 258: 257: 256: 252:The community 250: 249: 246: 238: 234: 230: 227: 225: 221: 217: 214: 212: 208: 204: 201: 199: 198:Sock puppetry 195: 191: 188: 187: 183: 179: 176: 174: 170: 166: 165:Verifiability 163: 161: 157: 154: 153: 152: 151: 145: 144: 139: 136: 134: 131: 129: 125: 122: 121: 120: 119: 113: 112: 107: 103: 99: 97: 93: 89: 86: 85: 84: 83: 77: 76: 73: 72: 64: 61: 57: 52: 47: 43: 35: 31: 27: 22: 21: 18: 17: 2807: 2801: 2778: 2772: 2766: 2729: 2723: 2700: 2692: 2690: 2656: 2650: 2627: 2619: 2617: 2583: 2577: 2554: 2546: 2544: 2479: 2442: 2419: 2389: 2370: 2351: 2283: 2192: 2187: 2135: 2103: 2071: 2052: 1961: 1863: 1825: 1805: 1785: 1726: 1704: 1698: 1692: 1686: 1677: 1666:. Users who 1661: 1598: 1594: 1590: 1533: 1485: 1445: 1425: 1383: 1360: 1342: 1335: 1332: 1328:Jacqui_Smith 873: 786: 749: 741: 692: 680:Escape Orbit 672: 627: 552: 518: 493: 480: 471: 448: 427:User scripts 308:IRC channels 299:Village pump 115:Getting help 56:edit summary 37: 34:Getting Help 33: 2809:voting page 2731:voting page 2658:voting page 2332:Binksternet 2291:Binksternet 2218:a long list 2200:Covarrubias 1727:you may be 1672:collaborate 753:Bentaguayre 727:Guinness323 696:Guinness323 414:Translation 365:Peer review 102:edit a page 2793:topic bans 2715:topic bans 2642:topic bans 2569:topic bans 2500:topic bans 2424:. Thanks, 1552:Off2riorob 1536:Off2riorob 1518:Off2riorob 1488:Off2riorob 1456:Off2riorob 1448:Off2riorob 1428:Off2riorob 1410:Off2riorob 1345:Off2riorob 669:Tony Blair 573:yourself. 395:Clean up: 391:Talk pages 387:User pages 352:Categories 237:Notability 203:Copyrights 60:DuncanHill 40:{{helpme}} 2789:site bans 2711:site bans 2638:site bans 2565:site bans 2496:site bans 2408:Read the 2354:Mais oui! 2280:Macmillan 2214:Chaosname 2158:Chaosname 1711:consensus 1707:talk page 1601:Happyme22 1599:My best, 1384:The Times 1361:Telegraph 1359:See this 1268:Deavenger 1202:Deavenger 1160:Deavenger 1063:Deavenger 973:Deavenger 905:Deavenger 852:Deavenger 790:Deavenger 675:talk page 405:Vandalism 383:User name 278:Etiquette 224:Vandalism 2373:IIIraute 1809:Eebahgum 1802:That Mfd 1717:or seek 1664:edit war 1363:report: 632:Malick78 628:presence 592:Malick78 559:Malick78 304:Signpost 274:Civility 100:How to: 2816:NoACEMM 2461:Stefan2 2426:DPL bot 2307:Lachrie 2262:Lachrie 2222:Lachrie 2170:Lachrie 2162:Xaxosax 2154:Xaxosax 2123:Lachrie 2091:Lachrie 2028:Lachrie 1998:Lachrie 1962:against 1936:Lachrie 1911:Lachrie 1869:Lachrie 1848:Lachrie 1751:Lachrie 1729:blocked 1617:Lachrie 1571:Lachrie 1504:Lachrie 1473:Lachrie 1391:Lachrie 1368:Lachrie 1302:Lachrie 1237:Lachrie 1179:Lachrie 1122:Lachrie 1114:Lachrie 1016:Lachrie 936:Lachrie 878:Lachrie 823:Lachrie 806:Lachrie 769:Lachrie 712:Lachrie 651:Lachrie 607:Lachrie 575:Lachrie 531:Lachrie 513:Message 498:Lachrie 475:Message 397:General 26:Welcome 2486:. The 2139:Comics 2107:Comics 2075:Comics 2055:Nandt1 2013:Nandt1 1967:Nandt1 1888:Nandt1 455:Shtove 1764:then. 423:Tools 348:Stubs 2827:talk 2779:The 2740:talk 2701:The 2667:talk 2628:The 2594:talk 2555:The 2520:talk 2465:talk 2430:talk 2377:talk 2358:talk 2336:talk 2311:talk 2295:talk 2266:talk 2244:talk 2226:talk 2195:Alex 2174:talk 2143:talk 2127:talk 2111:talk 2095:talk 2079:talk 2059:talk 2032:talk 2017:talk 2002:talk 1971:talk 1940:talk 1915:talk 1892:talk 1873:talk 1852:talk 1836:talk 1813:talk 1793:talk 1770:talk 1755:talk 1738:talk 1639:talk 1635:John 1621:talk 1605:talk 1575:talk 1556:talk 1540:talk 1522:talk 1508:talk 1492:talk 1477:talk 1460:talk 1452:talk 1432:talk 1414:talk 1395:talk 1372:talk 1349:talk 1306:talk 1272:talk 1241:talk 1206:talk 1183:talk 1164:talk 1126:talk 1118:talk 1067:talk 1020:talk 977:talk 940:talk 909:talk 882:talk 856:talk 827:talk 810:talk 794:talk 773:talk 757:talk 731:talk 716:talk 700:talk 655:talk 636:talk 611:talk 596:talk 579:talk 563:talk 535:talk 519:XENU 516:from 502:talk 481:XENU 478:from 459:talk 401:Spam 220:Spam 128:Tips 2480:Hi, 2410:FAQ 2829:) 2818:}} 2814:{{ 2791:, 2742:) 2734:. 2713:, 2669:) 2661:. 2640:, 2596:) 2588:. 2567:, 2522:) 2498:, 2467:) 2432:) 2402:| 2379:) 2360:) 2338:) 2313:) 2297:) 2268:) 2246:) 2228:) 2220:. 2176:) 2168:. 2145:) 2129:) 2113:) 2097:) 2081:) 2061:) 2034:) 2019:) 2004:) 1973:) 1942:) 1917:) 1894:) 1875:) 1854:) 1838:) 1815:) 1795:) 1772:) 1757:) 1740:) 1641:) 1623:) 1607:) 1577:) 1558:) 1546:) 1542:) 1524:) 1510:) 1498:) 1494:) 1479:) 1466:) 1462:) 1438:) 1434:) 1416:) 1397:) 1386:: 1374:) 1355:) 1351:) 1308:) 1274:) 1243:) 1208:) 1185:) 1166:) 1128:) 1069:) 1022:) 979:) 942:) 911:) 884:) 858:) 829:) 812:) 796:) 775:) 759:) 751:-- 733:) 718:) 702:) 657:) 638:) 613:) 598:) 581:) 565:) 537:) 504:) 461:) 425:• 421:• 412:• 403:- 399:- 389:• 385:• 363:• 354:• 350:• 341:• 332:• 310:• 306:• 297:• 285:• 276:• 272:• 263:• 235:• 231:• 222:• 218:• 209:• 205:• 196:• 192:• 180:• 171:• 167:• 158:• 126:• 104:• 94:• 90:• 2825:( 2738:( 2665:( 2592:( 2518:( 2463:( 2428:( 2416:. 2398:( 2375:( 2356:( 2334:( 2309:( 2293:( 2264:( 2242:( 2224:( 2172:( 2141:( 2125:( 2109:( 2093:( 2077:( 2057:( 2030:( 2015:( 2000:( 1969:( 1938:( 1913:( 1890:( 1871:( 1850:( 1834:( 1811:( 1791:( 1768:( 1753:( 1736:( 1701:. 1695:. 1689:. 1637:( 1619:( 1603:( 1573:( 1562:) 1554:( 1538:( 1528:) 1520:( 1506:( 1490:( 1475:( 1458:( 1450:( 1430:( 1420:) 1412:( 1408:( 1393:( 1370:( 1347:( 1304:( 1270:( 1239:( 1204:( 1181:( 1162:( 1124:( 1116:( 1065:( 1018:( 975:( 938:( 907:( 880:( 854:( 825:( 808:( 792:( 771:( 755:( 729:( 714:( 698:( 653:( 634:( 609:( 594:( 577:( 561:( 533:( 500:( 457:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index