Knowledge (XXG)

User talk:Rtyq2

Source 📝


Re: Speedy Deletion

Cool. Thanks for letting me know!

K50 Dude..........(TALK PAGE)

Please take care with deletion templates

Regarding this edit, I would ask you to please take much more care when referring to an editor's good-faith contributions. For a new editor to spend a lot of time writing a referenced article in an area where Knowledge (XXG) is weak, and then to have their contribution labelled "unsalvageably incoherent" and "patent nonsense" within 4 minutes of submission... well... that's no way to make a new editor feel welcome. I appreciate that it's easy to make mistakes when you're making a lot of edits quickly, but please remember that you're dealing with real people who have volunteered their free time. Adrian J. Hunter 12:46, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Well it's true

Well it's true Madirox2222 (talk) 02:48, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

thanks

Gosh, user page vandalism. Funny how it's the little things you miss when you're away from wikipedia for a while. ;-) Thanks for the cleanup. --fvw* 02:50, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome! I'll watch his edits for a little bit in case he continues. Rtyq2 (talk) 02:58, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Amon Tobin ref

Hi. Re: this edit, don't do anything hateful, just add it back somewhere else instead of deleting it! Also, I've replaced the second ref as it confirms the first, and either might become inaccessible; extensive refs are not generally considered a problem :) -- Quiddity (talk) 06:48, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

The Barnstar of High Culture
Huge thanks to you both, for all the patience and work put in at Amon Tobin. -- Quiddity (talk) 20:59, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

GA review of Amon Tobin

Hi there Rtyq2. You've been doing a beautiful job on improving the article and I admire your willingness to work on the article. (I wonder what happened to the nominator?) It really is almost there. Just a few more things to take care of. Concerning the rationale for the image, don't worry about it. I'll take care of that tonight. If you wish to learn more about it, just click on the other images to see how the rationales are done because those ones are okay, as far as I'm concerned. Just keep working on the references section of the GA review and it'll be finished. – Ms. Sarita 18:09, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

That's a tricky one. It seems like Tobin may have a song heard in the film but that it wasn't put onto the official commercially-released soundtrack. I took a look at Tobin's discography on Allmusic.com and it says that that particular song ("Saboteur") was not featured on the soundtrack for the film either. Since IMDb is not a particularly reliable reference (although I have seen it used in FAs), you may, unfortunately, have to remove the information if a source cannot be found. – Ms. Sarita 18:40, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Tell you what. I actually own The Italian Job. What I'll do is take a look at it tonight (after my finals...ugh) and if the song is listed in the credits, we can cite the actual film. I tried to do a search for information on the Internet and turned up nothing, so the video may be our only chance of keeping this information in the article. So, for now, just focus on the other things on the list and don't worry about this particular citation. – Ms. Sarita 18:51, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Hi there. Sorry it took me so long to get back to you. I crashed and burned after my 4-hour final last night. As far as the website goes, I was concerned that since the information was labeled "Current", that it might be updated too often and the corresponding information would be pushed out within a few months. After looking at it, it seems that their information goes back almost two years, so it looks like it's okay to use. As far as format, just use the regular "cite web" template and put the address of the website; in small writing, I would write something like "Current > News". Make sure you input a date for the information (i.e. "2008-12-08"). I'll take a look at the citation after you've put it in the article and tweak it out if need be. I also incorporated the reference from The Italian Job into the article to support the related information, so that is finished. And I will be working on the rationale for the image later on today. Again, sorry about the late response. – Ms. Sarita 18:02, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

The Original Barnstar
For all of your hard work on improving the Amon Tobin article. – Ms. Sarita 03:47, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Not a problem. And ooh...another barnstar! You did some wonderful work on the article. If you ever need help with bettering it (or if you have GA nominations in the future and want me to review them), let me know and I'll come help you out! It was a pleasure working with you. – Ms. Sarita 03:57, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Amon Tobin

I just wanted to thank you for all your work on getting Amon Tobin promoted to GA-class. I took an extended hiatus during this semester, but it was great to come back and see the article with all those shiny green logos on it. --Sebquantic (talk) 17:42, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

No, thank you for this edit. That was much more work than anything I have done to the article, and the reason it got to GA class in the first place. If you ever want to improve it even further, just let me know (I've still been making little tweaks here and there to the article). Rtyq2 (talk) 17:45, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

I think I've spotted the problem that caused you to request refs. If so can you take the ref template off?Dejvid (talk) 12:54, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks very muchDejvid (talk) 20:29, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Knowledge (XXG) Signpost, January 31, 2009

The Knowledge (XXG) Signpost
The Knowledge (XXG) Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 5, Issue 5 31 January 2009 About the Signpost
Large portion of articles are orphans News and notes: Ogg support, Knowledge (XXG) Loves Art, Jimbo honored 
Knowledge (XXG) in the news: Flagged Revisions, Internet Explorer add-on Dispatches: In the news 
WikiProject Report: Motto of the Day Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 20:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 22:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Knowledge (XXG) Signpost, February 8, 2009

The Knowledge (XXG) Signpost
The Knowledge (XXG) Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 5, Issue 6 8 February 2009 About the Signpost
News and notes: Elections, licensing update, and more Knowledge (XXG) in the news: Knowledge (XXG)'s future, WikiDashboard, and "wiki-snobs" 
Dispatches: April Fools 2009 mainpage WikiProject Report: WikiProject Music 
Features and admins The Report on Lengthy Litigation 
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 15:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 22:51, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Knowledge (XXG) Signpost — February 16, 2009

The Signpost
Volume 5, Issue 7
Weekly Delivery
2009-02-16

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist.
If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 07:35, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Knowledge (XXG) Signpost — February 23, 2009

This week, the Knowledge (XXG) Signpost published volume 5, issue 8, which includes these articles:

The kinks are still being worked out in a new design for these Signpost deliveries, and we apologize for the plain format for this week.

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 21:44, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Knowledge (XXG) Signpost — 2 March 2009

This week, the Knowledge (XXG) Signpost published volume 5, issue 9, which includes these articles:

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 20:43, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Knowledge (XXG) Signpost — 9 March 2009

This week, the Knowledge (XXG) Signpost published volume 5, issue 10, which includes these articles:

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 00:38, 10 March 2009 (UTC)


Knowledge (XXG) Signpost — 16 March 2009

The Knowledge (XXG) Signpost  — 16 March 2009

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 23:46, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

The Knowledge (XXG) SignpostKnowledge (XXG) Signpost: 23 March 2009

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 04:50, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

The Knowledge (XXG) SignpostKnowledge (XXG) Signpost: 30 March 2009

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 20:48, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

The Knowledge (XXG) SignpostKnowledge (XXG) Signpost: 6 April 2009

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 19:38, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

The Knowledge (XXG) SignpostKnowledge (XXG) Signpost: 13 April 2009

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 16:49, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

The Knowledge (XXG) SignpostKnowledge (XXG) Signpost: 20 April 2009

Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 19:10, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

The Knowledge (XXG) SignpostKnowledge (XXG) Signpost: 27 April 2009

Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 04:45, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

The Knowledge (XXG) SignpostKnowledge (XXG) Signpost: 11 May 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 22:19, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

The Knowledge (XXG) SignpostKnowledge (XXG) Signpost: 18 May 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 13:27, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

The Knowledge (XXG) SignpostKnowledge (XXG) Signpost: 25 May 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 04:05, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

The Knowledge (XXG) SignpostKnowledge (XXG) Signpost: 1 June 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 22:56, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

The Knowledge (XXG) SignpostKnowledge (XXG) Signpost: 15 June 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 12:09, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

The Knowledge (XXG) SignpostKnowledge (XXG) Signpost: 22 June 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:19, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

The Knowledge (XXG) SignpostKnowledge (XXG) Signpost: 29 June 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:28, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

The Knowledge (XXG) SignpostKnowledge (XXG) Signpost: 6 July 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:27, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

The Knowledge (XXG) SignpostKnowledge (XXG) Signpost: 27 July 2009

Delivered by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 12:42, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

The Knowledge (XXG) SignpostKnowledge (XXG) Signpost: 3 August 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 05:58, 4 August 2009 (UTC)


Proposed deletion of Ted (song)

The article Ted (song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not notable

While all contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Colonel Warden (talk) 08:55, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

The Knowledge (XXG) SignpostKnowledge (XXG) Signpost: 10 August 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 05:20, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

The Knowledge (XXG) SignpostKnowledge (XXG) Signpost: 17 August 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:56, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

The Knowledge (XXG) SignpostKnowledge (XXG) Signpost: 24 August 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 04:29, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

The Knowledge (XXG) Signpost: 21 September 2009

The Knowledge (XXG) Signpost: 28 September 2009

The Knowledge (XXG) Signpost: 5 October 2009

The Knowledge (XXG) Signpost: 12 October 2009

The Knowledge (XXG) Signpost: 19 October 2009

The Knowledge (XXG) Signpost: 26 October 2009

The Knowledge (XXG) Signpost: 2 November 2009

The Knowledge (XXG) Signpost: 9 November 2009

The Knowledge (XXG) Signpost: 16 November 2009

The Knowledge (XXG) Signpost: 23 November 2009

The Knowledge (XXG) Signpost: 30 November 2009

The Knowledge (XXG) Signpost: 7 December 2009

The Knowledge (XXG) Signpost: 14 December 2009

The Knowledge (XXG) Signpost: 21 December 2009

The Knowledge (XXG) Signpost: 28 December 2009

The Knowledge (XXG) Signpost: 1 January 2010

The Knowledge (XXG) Signpost: 11 January 2010

The Knowledge (XXG) Signpost: 18 January 2010

The Knowledge (XXG) Signpost: 25 January 2010

The Knowledge (XXG) Signpost: 1 February 2010

The Knowledge (XXG) Signpost: 8 February 2010

The Knowledge (XXG) Signpost: 15 February 2010

The Knowledge (XXG) Signpost: 22 February 2010

The Knowledge (XXG) Signpost: 1 March 2010

The Knowledge (XXG) Signpost: 8 March 2010

The Knowledge (XXG) Signpost: 15 March 2010

The Knowledge (XXG) Signpost: 22 March 2010

The Knowledge (XXG) Signpost: 29 March 2010

The Knowledge (XXG) Signpost: 5 April 2010

The Knowledge (XXG) Signpost: 12 April 2010

The Knowledge (XXG) Signpost: 19 April 2010

The Knowledge (XXG) Signpost: 26 April 2010

The Knowledge (XXG) Signpost: 3 May 2010

The Knowledge (XXG) Signpost: 10 May 2010

The Knowledge (XXG) Signpost: 17 May 2010

The Knowledge (XXG) Signpost: 24 May 2010

The Knowledge (XXG) Signpost: 31 May 2010

The Knowledge (XXG) Signpost: 7 June 2010

The Knowledge (XXG) Signpost: 14 June 2010

The Knowledge (XXG) Signpost: 21 June 2010

The Knowledge (XXG) Signpost: 28 June 2010

The Knowledge (XXG) Signpost: 5 July 2010

The Knowledge (XXG) Signpost: 12 July 2010

The Knowledge (XXG) Signpost: 19 July 2010

The Knowledge (XXG) Signpost: 26 July 2010

The Knowledge (XXG) Signpost: 2 August 2010

The Knowledge (XXG) Signpost: 9 August 2010

The Signpost: 16 August 2010

The Signpost: 23 August 2010

The Signpost: 30 August 2010

The Signpost: 6 September 2010

The Signpost: 13 September 2010

The Signpost: 20 September 2010

The Signpost: 27 September 2010

The Signpost: 4 October 2010

The Signpost: 11 October 2010

The Signpost: 18 October 2010

The Signpost: 25 October 2010

The Signpost: 1 November 2010

The Signpost: 8 November 2010

The Signpost: 15 November 2010

The Signpost: 22 November 2010

The Signpost: 29 November 2010

The Signpost: 6 December 2010

The Signpost: 13 December 2010

The Signpost: 20 December 2010

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Rtyq2! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you  have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to  know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

  • If this invitation  also appears on other accounts you  may  have, please complete the  survey  once only. 
  • If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you  have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:05, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Saint Aime (album) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Saint Aime (album) is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Saint Aime (album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 04:04, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bessemer Cocktail

The article Bessemer Cocktail has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable album-no cd was even made for it

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 01:18, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Junior Glue

The article Junior Glue has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non nontable album

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 01:19, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Junior Glue

The article Junior Glue has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable album

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 01:19, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pure Rock

The article Pure Rock has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable album

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 01:23, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

New deal for page patrollers

Hi Rtyq2,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

  1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
  2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
  3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
  4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
  5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑