Knowledge (XXG)

User talk:Paulley/Archive 10

Source 📝

 < Archive 9    Archive 10   
All Pages:  1 -  2 -  3 -  4 -  5 -  6 -  7 -  8 -  9 -  10 -  ... (up to 100)


WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter

The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter
Issue LXXIII - July 18, 2010

Issue LXXII | Issue LXXIV


Project in Review

As of July 2010:

Professional wrestling articles by quality and importance
Quality Importance
Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total
FA 2 3 7 12
FL 1 26 44 71
GA 10 109 217 1 337
B 11 41 140 350 6 548
C 9 50 304 1,789 63 2,215
Start 2 48 339 5,166 163 5,718
Stub 2 283 1 38 324
List 1 65 1,183 41 1,290
Category 3 22 2,296 2,321
Disambig 1 21 22
File 1 1 1,684 1,686
Redirect 1 11 105 649 766
Template 2 7 112 806 927
NA 6 115 121
Draft 1 13 14
Assessed 22 157 1,010 9,286 5,585 312 16,372
Unassessed 1 1 2
Total 22 157 1,010 9,287 5,585 313 16,374
WikiWork factors (?) ω = 41,716 Ω = 4.56

Changes to Featured and Good Content


Other Project News

—Articles

—Project



Events Calendar

This section is intended to warn users about potential targets of vandalism and speculation: professional wrestling events from major promotions for the months of July and August.



Recent Professional Wrestling News


Editing Tips

This section is devoted to helping project members become familiar with the Manual of Style and general editing tips.

  1. A list of unreferenced wrestling-related BLPs is generated here. Please help out by sourcing these articles.
  2. Please consider helping out with the project's 2010 Resolutions, and help achieve one of the goals listed.
  3. When adding headers to articles, do not add wikilinks to them and only capitalize the first letter of the first word and any proper nouns.
  4. Please remember that fair use images and media can be only be used if no free equivalent is available or could be created. Fair use images uploaded when a free equivalent exists will be deleted.
  5. Avoid using dirtsheets as sources. Adhere to WP:RS when adding information with a source to articles. For a list of reliable and unreliable wrestling-related sources see WP:PW/SG#Sources.

Contributors to this Issue


Project Navigation
Delivered: 17:42, 19 July 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter

The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter
Issue LXXIV - August 1, 2010

Issue LXXIII | Issue LXXV


Project in Review

As of August 2010:

Professional wrestling articles by quality and importance
Quality Importance
Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total
FA 2 3 7 12
FL 1 26 44 71
GA 10 109 217 1 337
B 11 41 140 350 6 548
C 9 50 304 1,789 63 2,215
Start 2 48 339 5,166 163 5,718
Stub 2 283 1 38 324
List 1 65 1,183 41 1,290
Category 3 22 2,296 2,321
Disambig 1 21 22
File 1 1 1,684 1,686
Redirect 1 11 105 649 766
Template 2 7 112 806 927
NA 6 115 121
Draft 1 13 14
Assessed 22 157 1,010 9,286 5,585 312 16,372
Unassessed 1 1 2
Total 22 157 1,010 9,287 5,585 313 16,374
WikiWork factors (?) ω = 41,716 Ω = 4.56

Changes to Featured and Good Content


Other Project News

—Articles

—Project



Events Calendar

This section is intended to warn users about potential targets of vandalism and speculation: professional wrestling events from major promotions for the month of August.



Recent Professional Wrestling News


Editing Tips

This section is devoted to helping project members become familiar with the Manual of Style and general editing tips.

  1. Trivia sections are discouraged in wikipedia articles. Information from such sections, if notable, should be merged into the main body of the article.
  2. The lead section of an article should introduce the subject and summarize the entire article.
  3. Please consider helping out with the project's cleanup listing by fixing problems listed and removing the article from the listing.
  4. Please familiarize yourself with the general notability policy of Knowledge (XXG). Avoid creating new articles that do not satisfy the requirements.
  5. Avoid adding statements that will date quickly, for example "soon" and "now".

Contributors to this Issue


Project Navigation
Delivered: 16:25, 1 August 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter

The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter
Issue LXXV - August 15, 2010

Issue LXXIV | Issue LXXVI


Project in Review

As of August 2010:

Professional wrestling articles by quality and importance
Quality Importance
Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total
FA 2 3 7 12
FL 1 26 44 71
GA 10 109 217 1 337
B 11 41 140 350 6 548
C 9 50 304 1,789 63 2,215
Start 2 48 339 5,166 163 5,718
Stub 2 283 1 38 324
List 1 65 1,183 41 1,290
Category 3 22 2,296 2,321
Disambig 1 21 22
File 1 1 1,684 1,686
Redirect 1 11 105 649 766
Template 2 7 112 806 927
NA 6 115 121
Draft 1 13 14
Assessed 22 157 1,010 9,286 5,585 312 16,372
Unassessed 1 1 2
Total 22 157 1,010 9,287 5,585 313 16,374
WikiWork factors (?) ω = 41,716 Ω = 4.56

Changes to Featured and Good Content


Other Project News

—Articles

—Project



Events Calendar

This section is intended to warn users about potential targets of vandalism and speculation: professional wrestling events from major promotions for the months of August and September.



Recent Professional Wrestling News


Editing Tips

This section is devoted to helping project members become familiar with the Manual of Style and general editing tips.

  1. When adding headers to articles, do not add wikilinks to them and only capitalize the first letter of the first word and any proper nouns.
  2. Do not give undue weight to recent events in articles.
  3. If you come across an article that fails notability requirements, you can tag it for speedy deletion if the criteria apply, propose it for deletion, or nominate it at WP:AFD.
  4. Trivia sections are discouraged in wikipedia articles. Information from such sections, if notable, should be merged into the main body of the article.
  5. The lead section of an article should introduce the subject and summarize the entire article.

Contributors to this Issue


Project Navigation
Delivered: 16:20, 15 August 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter

The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter
Issue LXXVI - August 29, 2010

Issue LXXV | Issue LXXVII


Project in Review

As of August 2010:

Professional wrestling articles by quality and importance
Quality Importance
Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total
FA 2 3 7 12
FL 1 26 44 71
GA 10 109 217 1 337
B 11 41 140 350 6 548
C 9 50 304 1,789 63 2,215
Start 2 48 339 5,166 163 5,718
Stub 2 283 1 38 324
List 1 65 1,183 41 1,290
Category 3 22 2,296 2,321
Disambig 1 21 22
File 1 1 1,684 1,686
Redirect 1 11 105 649 766
Template 2 7 112 806 927
NA 6 115 121
Draft 1 13 14
Assessed 22 157 1,010 9,286 5,585 312 16,372
Unassessed 1 1 2
Total 22 157 1,010 9,287 5,585 313 16,374
WikiWork factors (?) ω = 41,716 Ω = 4.56

Changes to Featured and Good Content


Other Project News

—Articles

—Project



Events Calendar

This section is intended to warn users about potential targets of vandalism and speculation: professional wrestling events from major promotions for the month of September.



Recent Professional Wrestling News


Editing Tips

This section is devoted to helping project members become familiar with the Manual of Style and general editing tips.

  1. A list of unreferenced wrestling-related BLPs is generated here. Please help out by sourcing these articles.
  2. Be aware of words to avoid. Certain words, if chosen poorly, can subtly promote a point of view.
  3. Please consider helping out with the project's 2010 Resolutions, and help achieve one of the goals listed.
  4. Please remember that fair use images and media can be only be used if no free equivalent is available or could be created. Fair use images uploaded when a free equivalent exists will be deleted.
  5. Avoid using dirtsheets as sources. Adhere to WP:RS when adding information with a source to articles. For a list of reliable and unreliable wrestling-related sources see WP:PW/SG#Sources.

Contributors to this Issue


Project Navigation
Delivered: 16:40, 29 August 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter

The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter
Issue LXXVII - September 12, 2010

Issue LXXVI | Issue LXXVIII


Project in Review

As of September 2010:

Professional wrestling articles by quality and importance
Quality Importance
Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total
FA 2 3 7 12
FL 1 26 44 71
GA 10 109 217 1 337
B 11 41 140 350 6 548
C 9 50 304 1,789 63 2,215
Start 2 48 339 5,166 163 5,718
Stub 2 283 1 38 324
List 1 65 1,183 41 1,290
Category 3 22 2,296 2,321
Disambig 1 21 22
File 1 1 1,684 1,686
Redirect 1 11 105 649 766
Template 2 7 112 806 927
NA 6 115 121
Draft 1 13 14
Assessed 22 157 1,010 9,286 5,585 312 16,372
Unassessed 1 1 2
Total 22 157 1,010 9,287 5,585 313 16,374
WikiWork factors (?) ω = 41,716 Ω = 4.56

Changes to Featured and Good Content


Other Project News

—Articles

—Project



Events Calendar

This section is intended to warn users about potential targets of vandalism and speculation: professional wrestling events from major promotions for the month of September.



Recent Professional Wrestling News


Editing Tips

This section is devoted to helping project members become familiar with the Manual of Style and general editing tips.

  1. Knowledge (XXG) is not a crystal ball, so please do not add speculation about future events to articles.
  2. When adding headers to articles, do not add wikilinks to them and only capitalize the first letter of the first word and any proper nouns.
  3. Do not give undue weight to recent events in articles.
  4. If you come across an article that fails notability requirements, you can tag it for speedy deletion if the criteria apply, propose it for deletion, or nominate it at WP:AFD.
  5. Trivia sections are discouraged in wikipedia articles. Information from such sections, if notable, should be merged into the main body of the article.

Contributors to this Issue


Project Navigation
Delivered: 14:32, 12 September 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter

The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter
Issue LXXVIII - September 26, 2010

Issue LXXVII | Issue LXXIX


Project in Review

As of September 2010:

Professional wrestling articles by quality and importance
Quality Importance
Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total
FA 2 3 7 12
FL 1 26 44 71
GA 10 109 217 1 337
B 11 41 140 350 6 548
C 9 50 304 1,789 63 2,215
Start 2 48 339 5,166 163 5,718
Stub 2 283 1 38 324
List 1 65 1,183 41 1,290
Category 3 22 2,296 2,321
Disambig 1 21 22
File 1 1 1,684 1,686
Redirect 1 11 105 649 766
Template 2 7 112 806 927
NA 6 115 121
Draft 1 13 14
Assessed 22 157 1,010 9,286 5,585 312 16,372
Unassessed 1 1 2
Total 22 157 1,010 9,287 5,585 313 16,374
WikiWork factors (?) ω = 41,716 Ω = 4.56

Changes to Featured and Good Content


Other Project News

—Articles

—Project



Events Calendar

This section is intended to warn users about potential targets of vandalism and speculation: professional wrestling events from major promotions for the month of October.



Recent Professional Wrestling News


Editing Tips

This section is devoted to helping project members become familiar with the Manual of Style and general editing tips.

  1. The lead section of an article should introduce the subject and summarize the entire article.
  2. Please consider helping out with the project's cleanup listing by fixing problems listed and removing the article from the listing.
  3. Please familiarize yourself with the general notability policy of Knowledge (XXG). Avoid creating new articles that do not satisfy the requirements.
  4. Avoid adding statements that will date quickly, for example "soon" and "now".
  5. The Biographies of living persons policy should be strictly adhered to when adding information to biographical articles.
  1. Only add controversial, possibly contentious or libellous information if it comes from a reliable source and is verifiable.
  2. Make sure that all information contained in biographies of living persons is written neutrally, from a non-point of view perspective.

Contributors to this Issue


Project Navigation
Delivered: 21:51, 26 September 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter

The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter
Issue LXXIX - September 10, 2010

Issue LXXVIII | Issue LXXX


Project in Review

As of September 2010:

Professional wrestling articles by quality and importance
Quality Importance
Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total
FA 2 3 7 12
FL 1 26 44 71
GA 10 109 217 1 337
B 11 41 140 350 6 548
C 9 50 304 1,789 63 2,215
Start 2 48 339 5,166 163 5,718
Stub 2 283 1 38 324
List 1 65 1,183 41 1,290
Category 3 22 2,296 2,321
Disambig 1 21 22
File 1 1 1,684 1,686
Redirect 1 11 105 649 766
Template 2 7 112 806 927
NA 6 115 121
Draft 1 13 14
Assessed 22 157 1,010 9,286 5,585 312 16,372
Unassessed 1 1 2
Total 22 157 1,010 9,287 5,585 313 16,374
WikiWork factors (?) ω = 41,716 Ω = 4.56

Changes to Featured and Good Content


Other Project News

—Articles

—Project



Events Calendar

This section is intended to warn users about potential targets of vandalism and speculation: professional wrestling events from major promotions for the month of October.



Recent Professional Wrestling News


Editing Tips

This section is devoted to helping project members become familiar with the Manual of Style and general editing tips.

  1. Do not give undue weight to recent events in articles.
  2. If you come across an article that fails notability requirements, you can tag it for speedy deletion if the criteria apply, propose it for deletion, or nominate it at WP:AFD.
  3. Trivia sections are discouraged in wikipedia articles. Information from such sections, if notable, should be merged into the main body of the article.
  4. The lead section of an article should introduce the subject and summarize the entire article.
  5. Please consider helping out with the project's cleanup listing by fixing problems listed and removing the article from the listing.

Contributors to this Issue


Project Navigation
Delivered: 08:20, 11 October 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter

The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter
Issue LXXX - October 24, 2010

Issue LXXIX | Issue LXXXI


Project in Review

As of October 2010:

Professional wrestling articles by quality and importance
Quality Importance
Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total
FA 2 3 7 12
FL 1 26 44 71
GA 10 109 217 1 337
B 11 41 140 350 6 548
C 9 50 304 1,789 63 2,215
Start 2 48 339 5,166 163 5,718
Stub 2 283 1 38 324
List 1 65 1,183 41 1,290
Category 3 22 2,296 2,321
Disambig 1 21 22
File 1 1 1,684 1,686
Redirect 1 11 105 649 766
Template 2 7 112 806 927
NA 6 115 121
Draft 1 13 14
Assessed 22 157 1,010 9,286 5,585 312 16,372
Unassessed 1 1 2
Total 22 157 1,010 9,287 5,585 313 16,374
WikiWork factors (?) ω = 41,716 Ω = 4.56

Changes to Featured and Good Content


Other Project News

—Articles

—Project



Events Calendar

This section is intended to warn users about potential targets of vandalism and speculation: professional wrestling events from major promotions for the months of October and November.



Recent Professional Wrestling News


Editing Tips

This section is devoted to helping project members become familiar with the Manual of Style and general editing tips.

  1. A list of unreferenced wrestling-related BLPs is generated here. Please help out by sourcing these articles.
  2. Be aware of words to avoid. Certain words, if chosen poorly, can subtly promote a point of view.
  3. Please consider helping out with the project's 2010 Resolutions, and help achieve one of the goals listed.
  4. Please remember that fair use images and media can be only be used if no free equivalent is available or could be created. Fair use images uploaded when a free equivalent exists will be deleted.
  5. Avoid using dirtsheets as sources. Adhere to WP:RS when adding information with a source to articles. For a list of reliable and unreliable wrestling-related sources see WP:PW/SG#Sources.

Contributors to this Issue


Project Navigation
Delivered: 10:05, 25 October 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

File copyright problem with File:Ashe-1.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Ashe-1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Knowledge (XXG) takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:57, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ashe-1.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ashe-1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:38, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Rl'nnd for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rl'nnd is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Rl'nnd until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Cambalachero (talk) 13:14, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Roy Bevis.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Roy Bevis.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Knowledge (XXG) articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹ 22:24, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Crossmore for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Crossmore is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Crossmore until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 21:41, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Charity show.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:19, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Aviv Maayan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aviv Maayan is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/AfD discussion title until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.--Sismarinho (talk) 11:14, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:StarkTowerAvengers.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:StarkTowerAvengers.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Knowledge (XXG) is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Closedmouth (talk) 13:48, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sha Samuels

The article Sha Samuels has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nikki311 02:12, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

The article Chris Andrews (wrestler) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nikki311 03:57, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of British Heavyweight Championship (XWA) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article British Heavyweight Championship (XWA) is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/British Heavyweight Championship (XWA) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 14:46, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

The article International Pro Wrestling: United Kingdom has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable wrestling promotion. Relies on primary sources.

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 19:17, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

The article Revolution British Wrestling has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable wrestling promotion.

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 19:19, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of International Pro Wrestling: United Kingdom for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article International Pro Wrestling: United Kingdom is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/International Pro Wrestling: United Kingdom until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:07, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Revolution British Wrestling for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Revolution British Wrestling is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Revolution British Wrestling until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 18:34, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Ross Jordan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ross Jordan is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Ross Jordan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 18:35, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of The UK Pitbulls for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The UK Pitbulls is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/The UK Pitbulls until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lee Vilenski 12:40, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Please attribute or claim media you uploaded or restored: File:UKKid.JPG

You uploaded or restored , File:UKKid.JPG, but for various reasons did not add an {{information}} block, or indicate your (user) name on the file description page. Media uploaded to Knowledge (XXG) needs information on the SPECIFIC authorship and source of files, to ensure that it complies with copyright laws in various jurisdictions.

If it's entirely your own work, please include {{own}} in the relevant source field, amend the {{information}} added by a third party, ensuring that your user name (or name you want used for attribution) is clear in the author field, and change the license to an appropriate "self" variant (if such a license is not already used). You should also add an |author= parameter to the license tag, to assist reviews and image patrollers. You can also add |claimed=yes and an |author=to the {{media by uploader}} or {{presumed_self}} tag if it is present to indicate that you've acknowledged the image, and license shown (and updated the {{information}} where appropriate).

If it's not entirely your own work, then please update the source and authorship fields, so that they accurately reflect the source and authors of the original work(s), as well as the derivative you created. You should also not use a "self" license unless the work is entirely you own. Media that is incorrectly claimed as self or {{own}}, will eventually be listed at Files for Discussion or deleted, unless it's full status is entirely clear to other contributors, reviewers and image patrollers.

Whilst this notification, relates to a single media upload, it would also be appreciated if you could ensure that appropriate attribution exists for other media you uploaded, You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:52, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Please attribute or claim media you uploaded or restored: File:UKKid2.JPG

You uploaded or restored , File:UKKid2.JPG, but for various reasons did not add an {{information}} block, or indicate your (user) name on the file description page. Media uploaded to Knowledge (XXG) needs information on the SPECIFIC authorship and source of files, to ensure that it complies with copyright laws in various jurisdictions.

If it's entirely your own work, please include {{own}} in the relevant source field, amend the {{information}} added by a third party, ensuring that your user name (or name you want used for attribution) is clear in the author field, and change the license to an appropriate "self" variant (if such a license is not already used). You should also add an |author= parameter to the license tag, to assist reviews and image patrollers. You can also add |claimed=yes and an |author=to the {{media by uploader}} or {{presumed_self}} tag if it is present to indicate that you've acknowledged the image, and license shown (and updated the {{information}} where appropriate).

If it's not entirely your own work, then please update the source and authorship fields, so that they accurately reflect the source and authors of the original work(s), as well as the derivative you created. You should also not use a "self" license unless the work is entirely you own. Media that is incorrectly claimed as self or {{own}}, will eventually be listed at Files for Discussion or deleted, unless it's full status is entirely clear to other contributors, reviewers and image patrollers.

Whilst this notification, relates to a single media upload, it would also be appreciated if you could ensure that appropriate attribution exists for other media you uploaded, You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:52, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tonga Fifita, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Knowledge (XXG):FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. » Shadowowl | talk 19:38, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tonga Fifita, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Knowledge (XXG):FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. » Shadowowl | talk 14:33, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Special K (professional wrestling) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Special K (professional wrestling) is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Special K (professional wrestling) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Galatz גאליץ 14:33, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Notice

The article NWA UK Hammerlock has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:GNG. No significant coverage in reliable third party sources. Only WP:ROUTINE match results or trivial mentions related to Finn Balor or Becky Lynch (but notability is not WP:INHERITED).

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nikki311 16:13, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Notice

The file File:Jorge castano.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of NWA UK Hammerlock for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article NWA UK Hammerlock is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/NWA UK Hammerlock until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nikki311 01:06, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

Notice

The article Phil Powers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG. No indication of notability in secondary, reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTP 01:55, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Notice

The article Camp H.A.M.M.E.R. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 17:56, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Camp Hammond.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Camp Hammond.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:26, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mad Jim Jaspers.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mad Jim Jaspers.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:42, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Creation of Gilpertpedon stand alone article

New Updates & Messages For Active Participants in the Marvel Comics work group

  • Current message (25/1/2020)

Greetings to you all & a great weekend. I took the iniative to send this mass message to you all because I observed from the article on Elders of the Universe that certain key members of the Elders of the Universe have no article of theirs and most glaring is that of Gilpertpedon/The Runner. I believe subject has become notable enough for a stand alone article & it would be a great idea for someone in possession of a picture of the runner which is their own work (as to avoid image copyright violations) to begin the article. Then the rest of us contribute to the article’s development.Celestina007 (talk) 14:38, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:49, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.