Knowledge (XXG)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:35, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Prabhuraj (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:NDIRECTOR and lacks third party sources. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 23:06, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:49, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:49, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

• Delete as per nom. No working references other than IMDb and his own Twitter page, and no claim of meeting WP:ENT or WP:NDIRECTOR. power~enwiki (π, ν) 18:39, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination Kanatonian (talk) 19:46, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
• Delete - lack of significant coverage. PhilKnight (talk) 23:37, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:22, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

GCC and Camp David Summit (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This appears to have been written in advance of a summit between then-US President Obama and leaders from Gulf countries in 2015. Because it was written in anticipation of a future event, I think WP:NOTCRYSTALBALL applies. But since it has happened, I think that WP:NOTNEWS is more appropriate. Jip Orlando (talk) 21:04, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:05, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:05, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:NOTNEWS. No incoming links so the event is clearly not encyclopedically relevant. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:29, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

• Delete as not news, and per WP:GNG. Bearian (talk) 00:29, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:22, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Anthony Coutinho and Company (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Fails WP:NCORP. Greenbörg (talk) 18:51, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:29, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:29, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America 08:33, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

• Delete - lack of significant coverage. PhilKnight (talk) 23:23, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete per A7. South Nashua (talk) 14:08, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:25, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Zara Durrani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Knowledge (XXG) contributors. Knowledge (XXG) has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes. However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

No in-depth coverage. Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. Greenbörg (talk) 18:44, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:48, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:48, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:48, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:48, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

• Delete - lack of significant coverage. PhilKnight (talk) 23:29, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

• Delete for lack of reliable sources. Her "official" site and the one for her show are both parked at this time, so I have removed them. PKT(alk) 17:12, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

• Speedy keep Was recruited here via Reddit at this link]. --KalamazooGuy (talk) 13:06, 7 November 2017 (UTC) — KalamazooGuy (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

The above-noted user 'KalamazooGuy' has been blocked for disruptive editing. PKT(alk) 15:28, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

• Delete didn't have sufficient coverage reliable sources to warrant an article and, searches returned only the sources already presenr of which some are not working entirely while some are mere websites.  — Ammarpad (talk) 13:21, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
• Keep Subject is notable, and this is a role account from wigan.gov.uk --Synnior22 (talk) 13:25, 7 November 2017 (UTC) — Synnior22 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:13, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Alex Amancio (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly sourced, does not meet BLP criteria. Lordtobi (✉) 15:56, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 17:07, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 17:07, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:28, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

• Delete I have to admit I look forward to the article on someone who is the Chief Sanitary Officer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:33, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

• Delete -- merely a resume of a nn individual. Knowledge (XXG) is not LinkeIn. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:04, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:28, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Stefan Fournier (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:GNG with mostly mentions and WP:ROUTINE game coverage (he was a captain on a junior team so he usually gets mentioned in these) and local coverage from transactions. The closest thing I found to an article of significant depth is this one from the local paper where he played with the Mooseheads about playing against his brother. It could be considered routine as a local interest story, but it is still only one article of decent coverage which is not really enough for GNG. Currently does not meet any criteria in WP:NHOCKEY with not playing long enough in a well covered league, no individual awards, and no senior level national team appearances. He is also trending downwards in AHL appearances as he signed an ECHL contract, so barring a trip overseas, he seems to be sometime from passing NHOCKEY#2 in that regard. Yosemiter (talk) 14:52, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 17:09, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 17:10, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 17:10, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

• Delete a non-notable individual.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:44, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

• Delete: NN minor league hockey player, unremarkable career, fails NHOCKEY, no evidence he meets the GNG. Article created by editor under community ban for creating hundreds of NN stubs to bolster his new article count. Ravenswing 01:31, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to War for the Planet of the Apes. North America 14:24, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Max Lloyd-Jones (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of sources to establish general notability outside of the movie War for the Planet of the Apes, and lacking enough significant roles needed for WP:NACTOR. Article was previously a redirect to War for the Planet of the Apes, but given some other roles currently listed in the present version of the article, plus Adventures in Babysitting, I'm not sure restoring this to a redirect sounds like a good idea. MPFitz1968 (talk) 14:45, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:48, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:48, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

• Restore redirect. This one doesn't need to go through AfD – boldly restoring the redirect would have been justified. As a sidenote, I created Draft:Max Lloyd-Jones a while back, intending to see if this subject is independently notable, but got side-tracked and never made a stab at it. But, for right now, restoring the redirect sounds like the correct call in this case. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 18:21, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
• Delete or Restore redirect. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. I started this as a redirect to War for the Planet of the Apes, his only significant role to date. Another editor expanded it into an article. Not yet notable enough. Edwardx (talk) 12:00, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

• Delete or redirect (although I prefer the first). This is because of a lack of significant coverage in reliable sources, apart from this one article I found (). But, we need more significant coverage than just that, but there is none. Additionally, it fails WP:NACTOR, as this person is not a star in multiple notable films. Thus, it should be deleted. RileyBugz_投稿記録 20:52, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
• Delete a bunch of small roles does not notability make.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:31, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz 01:39, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Santa Fe Group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. The only possibly reliable sources given in the article are dead links right now and I suspect that they would fail WP:CORPDEPTH anyways. Google search didn't give me any more promising sources. shoy (reactions) 14:42, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

The following related article is also included in this nomination: Santa Fe Relocation Services for the same reasons. shoy (reactions) 14:49, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. shoy (reactions) 14:42, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. shoy (reactions) 14:42, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

• Comment the refs are fixed now bar one which was an affiliated site. Unfortunately only one of the refs is an independent source and it does not confirm much of the content. If reliable sources are found then I suggest Santa Fe Relocation Services is merged into Santa Fe Group. Atlantic306 (talk) 18:43, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America 06:01, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

• Delete Entirely promotional, no indications of notability, references fail the criteria for establishing notability, fails GNG and WP:NCORP. -- HighKing 16:10, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and above Fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP .Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21:51, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:30, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Amin Sulley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One mention in a Forbes list is about all I can find in terms of major coverage, that alone gives little indication that he passes WP:ANYBIO. DrStrauss talk 11:52, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:40, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:40, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

• Delete Sulley may at some point become a notable businessman, but "30 under 30" lists usually are more people who might be notable than ones who actually already are.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:34, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

• Delete -- for lack of sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail. Knowledge (XXG) is not LinkedIn nor a directory of nn entrepreneurs. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:59, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:12, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Kamal Mujtaba (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable boxer does not meet WP:NBOX. The article was speedy deleted several times for G11 and A7 but quickly recreated (see Kamal mujtaba). Only claim is coach to a boxer that is not particularly notable himself. This is promotional. PRehse (talk) 10:23, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Boxing-related deletion discussions. PRehse (talk) 10:26, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 11:55, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 11:55, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

• Delete does not meet notability guidelines for boxers.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:49, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:39, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Jean-Philippe Soucy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 04:45, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 12:05, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 12:05, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 12:05, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

• Delete and yet another non-notable hockey player.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:43, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

• Delete: NN minor league hockey player, unremarkable career in the semi-pros, fails NHOCKEY, no evidence he meets the GNG. Article created by editor under community ban for creating hundreds of NN stubs to bolster his new article count. Ravenswing 01:36, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Jared Spurgeon#Personal. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:12, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Tyler Spurgeon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 04:43, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 12:06, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 12:06, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

• Redirect to Jared Spurgeon#Personal. He does fail NHOCKEY with no awards and not enough appearances in known well covered leagues. He gets lots of mentions in the Austrian media as a captain of his team, but they are merely mentions. I could not find any articles (possibly because searching Austrian languages sites is not my forte) that were mainly about the subject, just post-game interviews, summaries, and similar fare. However, if a couple of significant depth articles about the subject turns up, this could be switched. Yosemiter (talk) 20:18, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:41, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Dustin Stevenson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 04:39, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 12:08, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 12:08, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 12:09, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

• Delete a non-notable hockey player. I am surprised as how many such articles Dolovis created. As in, I am sometimes not quite sure how Dolovis created this many articles period.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:42, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

• Delete: NN minor league hockey player, unremarkable career, fails NHOCKEY, no evidence he meets the GNG. Article created by editor under community ban for creating hundreds of NN stubs to bolster his new article count, and the simple reason he got away with it for so many years is that it's an order of magnitude easier to get a newbie indeffed for a half-dozen disruptive edits than it is to indef a veteran editor for a thousand disruptive edits. Ravenswing 01:34, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
• Just to be fair, this player did meet our old notability standard by virtue of playing more than 100 AHL games. So I can't really call this article disruptive, even if it is non-notable under our current standards. Rlendog (talk) 19:51, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  16:19, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Vishva Shakti Durga Mandir (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of independent sources to establish Notability. Redtigerxyz 13:35, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 16:10, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 16:10, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 16:10, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

• Merge (Was "Keep, tentatively"). Try searching on '"Mandir" Ontario', and get hits like this Hindustantimes article on prime minister Trudeau's visit. --doncram 17:49, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

The reference is not the same Mandir. It is about BAPS Shri Swaminarayan Mandir Toronto.--Redtigerxyz 06:57, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Replying to Redtigerxyz: Yes, when I wrote that I was aware that the Trudeau visit was to a temple in Toronto; I thought there would be similar coverage of visits to Hindu temples in the Ottawa area, and I perceived the Vishva Shakti Durga Mandir to be the general promoter of Hinduism in the greater Ottawa area. That's what the article says is its goal, promoting in "Ottawa, Eastern Ontario, and Canada" in general. I would think that the most major Hindu organization in the nation's capital, or capital area, would be notable. But I see now there is Hindu Temple of Ottawa-Carleton, which is older and has a much more significant building than does the downtown (Glebe)-located VSDM. So I strike my "Keep" vote.

However, I am still not sure on the notability of this one. What are shorter phrases / alternative names / better search terms to use than the "Vishva Shakti Durga Mandir" phrase, which is perhaps not used in full in common usage? For example, searching on "Hindu temple Ottawa" and the like might bring up more coverage. --doncram 23:46, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

I do think there ought to be Ottawa Citizen newspaper articles like those cited (but not linked, apparently not easily available online) at the end of the Hindu Temple of Ottawa-Carleton article. Can someone with access to that newspaper run some searching, and comment? --doncram 23:52, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

And, a better alternative to deletion is to merge content to its row in List of Hindu temples in Canada. There is room there for some description and a pic and more; it would improve the list article for it to explain the years of founding of the various Ottawa area temples. --doncram 00:00, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

• Delete, with regrets, for a complete lack of references from reliable sources. PKT(alk) 17:04, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
• Delete fails NonProf. L3X1 (distænt write) 04:20, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:42, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Blair Yaworski (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 07:35, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 11:32, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 11:32, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

• Delete - fails NHOCKEY and not seeing significant coverage to meet GNG. Weak even by Dolovis standards. Rlendog (talk) 21:36, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 13:29, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Alaska-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:05, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

• Delete: NN minor league hockey player, unremarkable and ephemeral career, fails NHOCKEY, no evidence he meets the GNG. Article created by editor under community ban for creating hundreds of NN stubs to bolster his new article count. Ravenswing 01:32, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. MBisanz 01:37, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Zack Torquato (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 07:57, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 10:14, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 10:14, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

• Delete Fails WP:NHOCKEY.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 12:53, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 13:31, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. MBisanz 01:36, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Dmitri Tarabrin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 08:06, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 10:15, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 10:15, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

• Delete does not meet notability guidelines for hockey players, which must be meant for someone only notable for playeing hockey. These guidelines are also way to low, since they allow for keeping articles with one, directory type source.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:41, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
  • I don't disagree with the conclusion in this case, but this is a misunderstanding of NHOCKEY (or any specialized notability guideline). A person does not need to meet the specialized guideline if they meet GNG. The specialized guideline only represents circumstances in which there is consensus that the subject is almost certain to meet GNG (or in some cases, not this one, a consensus that they should be deemed notable regardless of GNG). Rlendog (talk) 01:28, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 13:33, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Marios Joannou Elia. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:10, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

The Concept of Polymediality (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a book, which just states that it exists while failing to demonstrate any reason why its existence would be noteworthy. This was initially started as a straight copyvio of the book's sales profile on the website of its own publisher, thus suggesting that the intent here was advertorial rather than encyclopedic, and was then restubbed to its current form. And the only source here is a single directory entry in a library system, which is a routine type of source that any book in existence could always show. A book does not automatically pass WP:NBOOK just because it's nominally verifiable as existing -- it needs to be shown as the subject of reliable source coverage in media, not just to have a directory entry in a library catalogue. Bearcat (talk) 23:21, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. North America 06:03, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. North America 06:03, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

• Redirect to Marios Joannou Elia. A case of WP:TOOSOON, but there's a clear redirect target. power~enwiki (π, ν) 19:01, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:46, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

128 Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per various source searches, does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH. North America 01:09, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America 01:09, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. North America 01:09, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. North America 01:09, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Knowledge (XXG) contributors. Knowledge (XXG) has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes. However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

• Keep Result #1 on google. FertilityWizard (talk) 01:12, 19 October 2017 (UTC)— FertilityWizard (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

• Comment – Hi FertilityWizard: check out WP:LOTSOFGHITS. North America 01:14, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

• Delete -- no indications of notability or significance. Searches return nothing usable. Basically, promo spam. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:02, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

• Keep As there are two acts on the label (Claude Hay & <The Sleep-Ins) that have already met the notability criteria for a Wiki, it seems right that the label itself would as well. User:Peckynor (talk) 08:09, 31 October 2017 (UTC)— Peckynor (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

• Delete fails WP:CORPDEPTH as nom said. References 1 and 3 (out of only 3) are not directly talking about the label. I can't find anything reliable in my little search. The SPA accounts above that want it kept have done nothing to improve the article even by single word.  — Ammarpad (talk) 14:43, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
• Delete per nom Fails WP:CORPDEPTH.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 10:20, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:42, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Southbound (Hour Glass album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article on a compilation album that has been unsourced for five years. Why is that; well simply because there is a lack of reviews and independent sources. Hence it fails WP:GNG, and, without any evidence it charted (doubtful), it also fails WP:NMUSIC. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 23:12, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. North America 06:03, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

• Delete as per nom; a compilation album by a fairly-obscure band released 35 years after recording is unlikely to be notable, and there are no sources that suggest otherwise. power~enwiki (π, ν) 19:03, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
• Delete per nom fails WP:NMUSIC.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21:55, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:09, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Donald Bingham III (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advertorially toned WP:AUTOBIO (creator's username = DonraybIII), created in draftspace and then immediately moved to mainspace without an AFC review, about an entrepreneur whose notability claims are more aspirational than concrete: the article says more about what he wants to achieve than it does about any already-attained accomplishment that would pass a notability criterion. And its only "sources" are his own self-published content: the app's own website and his LinkedIn profile. As always, Knowledge (XXG) is not a free public relations platform on which everybody who aspires to be the next Mark Zuckerberg gets to give himself an article just because he exists: he needs to be the subject of reliable source coverage in media, verifying that he's already accomplished something that satisfies a notability criterion, for an article to become earned — and even when those conditions have been met, he still won't get to write the article himself. Bearcat (talk) 23:11, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America 06:03, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

• Delete Knowledge (XXG) is not Linkedin.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:17, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:SPAM. We could lose our charity status if we allow this to continue. Bearian (talk) 00:25, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
• Delete per the above. SmartSE (talk) 15:25, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:08, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Andrei Popescu (businessman) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Marginally notable businessman who has had brief coverage in various publications (as cited in the article, although mostly trivial), doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG or WP:NBUSINESSPEOPLE ~Anachronist (talk) 22:54, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America 06:05, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. North America 06:05, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

• Delete provided sources show only trivial coverage. jcc (tea and biscuits) 17:10, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
• Delete per above, and because notability is not automatically inherited from one's business. Bearian (talk) 00:27, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:08, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Joseph Waugh (badminton) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Badminton player but with only a single losing match at national level. Fails WP:NBADMINTON. Previous PROD deleted by an IP so now as AfD. No independent refs at all and searches throw up nothing better  Velella  22:48, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

• Delete no where close to meeting notability guidelines for sports players.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:44, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. North America 06:05, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America 06:05, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

• Delete doesn't meet the SNG, definitely doesn't meet GNG. power~enwiki (π, ν) 19:07, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. MBisanz 01:36, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Kōsuke Meguro (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable Japanese voice actor, only major role was Philotas in Alexander Senki. JA Knowledge (XXG) shows a credits list. No potential to develop into any meaningful article. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:33, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:34, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:34, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:34, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:34, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:34, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

• Delete a non-notable voice actor.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:52, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Notable. Needs improvement, not deletion. (non-admin closure) TheSandDoctor (talk) 07:23, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Viken Babikian (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable Rathfelder (talk) 22:30, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America 06:31, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. North America 06:31, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Armenia-related deletion discussions. North America 06:31, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America 06:31, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. North America 06:31, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

• Keep. I notice that the nominator doesn't describe the steps he took to determine that this subject is non-notable, but I'm wondering if that included checking citation counts. I'm seeing more than a page of triple-digit-cited articles in Google Scholar (though he doesn't appear to have a GS profile). Even for clinical medicine, I think this should get him over the bar. EricEnfermero (Talk) 02:25, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
• He is a living person. There needs to be external references. Rathfelder (talk) 19:04, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Are you indicating that you are going to close this in lieu of a BLP PROD? EricEnfermero (Talk) 19:39, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

• WP:BLPPRIMARY Rathfelder (talk) 22:20, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
• Keep I agree with Eric based on Knowledge (XXG):Notability_(academics)#Citation_metrics. Citation count is sufficient in this case.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 20:41, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
• Keep per above, passes WP:PROF#C1. Yet another nomination based on Rathfelder's misinterpretation of the BLP policy. – Joe (talk) 11:01, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
• The Knowledge (XXG):Biographies of living persons policies apply just as much to eminent doctors as to anyone else. Rathfelder (talk) 15:16, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

@Rathfelder: Could you please quote the section of WP:BLP that you think supports this rash of nominations of notable people? – Joe (talk) 15:59, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

• Verifiability (V)

No original research (NOR) "Where primary-source material has been discussed by a reliable secondary source, it may be acceptable to rely on it to augment the secondary source, subject to the restrictions of this policy, no original research, and the other sourcing policies." The articles I have nominated have no secondary sources at all. Rathfelder (talk) 21:52, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

• Keep. Subject has been demonstrated to pass WP:PROF#C1. If the sources that establish notability are not in the article yet, Rathfelder is invited to add them, as AfD is not for cleanup. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:38, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. MBisanz 01:36, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Panama Red (musician) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:Band No media coverage except for incidental mention in blogs, no hits, no major record contract, no notable concerts, no awards Rogermx (talk) 20:16, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America 07:06, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

• Delete Failure of WP:MUSICBIO. Non-notable musician. None of his works have gained traction anywhere, outside of (as noted above) blogs. Of note; as stands, the article is a copyright violation. See Earwig's copyvio report. --Hammersoft (talk) 20:28, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. MBisanz 01:35, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Parikshit Lalvani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Struggling to find any independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources - lack of WP:SIGCOV. Article looks rather promotional article. Edwardx (talk) 19:44, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 19:58, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 19:58, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

• Delete fails WP:GNG cuz of lack of WP:SIGCOV. The article reads more like a resume. —usernamekiran(talk) 22:01, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America 06:34, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. MBisanz 01:35, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Kallam-e-Grohirri (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable per WP:NBOOK. Just a simple book about someone with no review. Greenbörg (talk) 18:39, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 20:22, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 20:23, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

• Delete. An unreferenced article about a book for which there doesn't seem to be any evidence of notability. Breaking sticks (talk) 21:56, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:49, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Altaf Shaikh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No in-depth coverage in multiple sources per WP:RS. The subject is not notable per WP:NWRITER and fails WP:GNG. Greenbörg (talk) 18:32, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 20:24, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:21, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:21, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

• Delete - google search didn't turn up anything for this individual, and the one reference provided is a dead link. Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:GNG.PohranicniStraze (talk) 01:03, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
• Delete for sheer lack of sources. My searches aren't finding him.E.M.Gregory (talk) 17:55, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:45, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

CD Choice Music (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete No indications of notability, fails GNG and WP:NCORP. -- HighKing 11:53, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 12:48, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 12:48, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Delete per nom fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:NCORP.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:14, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:43, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Gungun Online (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Three hits in the WP:VG/RS custom Google search engine. Fails WP:N. soetermans. 11:33, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 11:58, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

• Delete There's actually only one reliable source hit with VG/RS search, IndieGamers.com. The others are mishits on forum topics by users. The current link in the article itself is a blog on a site and is unreliable. -- ferret (talk) 12:07, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

• Delete I rejected it from article requests due to non-notability. Looks like someone created it anyway... still not notable._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 04:46, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:31, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

For Allah, then for history (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails both WP:BK and WP:GNG. Analysis of book's significance may be a case of WP:OR. The two sources referenced in this article are two non-RS blogs. A search of Google News, newspapers.com, and JSTOR failed to find the phrase "For Allah, then for history." A search of Google Books found the phrase invoked twice: once in a footnote in a self-published book from vanity publisher iUniverse, the second time in a one-sentence mention in a RS-published book. Chetsford (talk) 21:36, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

• KEEPI don't think it fails WP:BK. It is mentioned in at least two books (the source just added and in the book mentioned within the article) and in an online article which are cited as sources here.Kuching7102 (talk) 22:56, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Has it won a major literary award like the Nobel Prize or the Booker Award? Has it been the subject of two major works such as TV documentaries or bestseller lists? Has it been adapted into a major motion picture? Is it written by an historically significant author? Is it the subject of instruction at two or more accredited universities? If your answer to all of these questions is "no" then it fails WP:BK. If not, please tell us which way it passes BK. Chetsford (talk) 00:47, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:09, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:09, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

It meets the first requirement of WP:BK, and you will note that only ONE of that list is necessary for it to meet notability. It does not have to meet more than one or all 5. The first criteria: The book has been the subject of two or more non-trivial published works appearing in sources that are independent of the book itself. A published work can mean a book (which is one of the sources here) or a website/review etc (which is another of the four sources here). It clearly meets notabilityKuching7102 (talk) 03:41, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Mention in a footnote in a self-published book from iUniverse combined with a mention on shiaweb.org does not qualify as dedicated study by "two or more non-trivial published works". A documentary on PBS, a contemplative study published by Oxford University Press, a journal article analyzing the work in Journal of Islamic Studies - those would all pass muster. A footnote in a book from a vanity publisher and a mention on shiaweb don't. Sorry. Chetsford (talk) 04:14, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. I was unable to find any RS that cover this topic. Would be happy to change this if sources are found though. ---- Patar knight - /_{contributions} 05:39, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
• Deleteno need to expand on nominator's reasoning - it says it all. No WP:RS to establish WP:N. Sources cited are insufficient to show anything other than that a book exists. Regards from the UK, Nick Moyes (talk) 08:38, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
• Delete - I agree with Patar knight, and am surprised basic details such as a publication date (or estimation of it) are not available. Smmurphy 17:22, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:06, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Ghostemane (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable musician. All the sourcing available is either primary sourcing or not credible reliable independent sourcing, thus failing the general guideline found in WP:N. No evidence of meeting WP:NMUSIC either. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:53, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 06:05, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 06:05, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 06:05, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

• Weak delete. Some coverage exists (, , ) but unless anyone can add to this, I don't think there's enough to establish notability. --Michig (talk) 06:14, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

• Weak delete. I could not find sources better than the ones cited above; perhaps WP:TOOSOON to meet WP:MUSICBIO.  gongshow  talk  17:42, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:06, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Holistic Moms Network (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Any significant coverage in reliable sources? MrBill3 (talk) 17:27, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 20:32, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 20:32, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:03, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:03, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

• Delete with REFUND if more details emerge. I don't see any secondary coverage, and I'm not entirely sure if this is just a website/web community or something else. power~enwiki (π, ν) 00:56, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No consensus on a redirect, but the argument for redirecting here equally justifies deleting seems like. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:32, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Invocational media (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to be a theory invented by one author which has not gained widespread traction to the point that it would be notable. CapitalSasha ~ talk 03:36, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. - CHAMPION 04:19, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. - CHAMPION 04:19, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

• Weak Redirect to Digital computer. I agree there has been no significant or widespread traction of this term, proposed by Chesher in his PhD thesis. The term has been referred to in a small number of specialized books, like this, this and this and this. However I don't quite think this is sufficient to meet WP:GNG. Too much of this article draws on the PhD thesis and, as such, is WP:OR. A redirect seems appropriate because, In Chesher's own words: The term 'digital computer' is no longer useful or appropriate. I will offer instead what I think is a better concept for these devices: invocational media. So that's where it should point to. Nick Moyes (talk) 00:24, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
• Delete: Term invented and used by a single person to refer to something that has long existed and requires no name. I cannot find any evidence that anyone in the mentioned fields has ever used this term. Clearly fails NOTE. As to the possibility of a redirect, I would oppose even that. No one who would be searching for this term are actually looking for generic articles on computers, they would be looking for the original articles which would be the #1 hits on Google. Even having the redir leads to lower quality results for the people who might look this up, although I can't imagine who that might be. Maury Markowitz (talk) 15:07, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:06, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Chhingkhual Lanu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article appears to fail WP:NFILM as it is an orphan (de facto given the only links to the article are from userspaces or the production company which is itself also listed for deletion) with not enough notable content to be a viable Knowledge (XXG) article. A Google search also provides very little information. Vasemmistolainen (talk) 01:29, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

• Delete not verifiable; no references at all (not even IMDb) and no outbound links to people associated with the film. It's on Youtube so it's not a complete hoax, but that's all I can say for it. power~enwiki (π, ν) 00:49, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was deleted by DGG as WP:CSD#G5. Jenks24 (talk) 07:10, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Paul Maric (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An advertorially toned BLP that lacks sources that discusses the subject directly and in detail. Significant RS coverage not found. What comes up is mostly the show's web site and pieces by the subject. The article is cited to interviews, YouTube, and other sources otherwise not suitable for notability. Co-hosts a nn show; does not meet WP:ENT. WP:TOOSOON per review of available sources. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:55, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

• Keep I think he passes notability easily and a lot of internal links have been made to his article.NoMoreHate (talk) 11:03, 26 October 2017 (UTC)Struck due to sockpuppetry, note Knowledge (XXG):Sockpuppet_investigations/Susana_Hodge. power~enwiki (π, ν) 21:12, 2 November 2017 (UTC)